generated: '2026-08-26' method: searched source: https://rxredefined.com/ note: >- Rx Redefined publishes no machine-readable contract, so nothing here is derived from a spec. Every entry below is a compliance/regulatory claim made by Rx Redefined on its own public marketing site, recorded verbatim with the page it was read from. Standards conformance (OAuth2/OIDC/FHIR/RFC 9457/etc.) is unassessable for this provider — there is no API surface to assess. standards: - id: hipaa name: HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) conforms: true evidence: url: https://rxredefined.com/ quote: >- "Our platform is managed under an ISO 27001 certified infrastructure and goes above and beyond to meet all required and addressable HIPAA regulations." kind: provider-claim note: >- Self-asserted on the marketing homepage. No BAA, audit report or trust center is published; no third-party attestation was found. - id: iso-27001 name: ISO/IEC 27001 conforms: partial evidence: url: https://rxredefined.com/ quote: >- "Our platform is managed under an ISO 27001 certified infrastructure" kind: provider-claim note: >- Read carefully, the claim is about the HOSTING INFRASTRUCTURE being ISO 27001 certified, not about Rx Redefined itself holding the certificate. The application host app.rxredefined.com resolves to elb-rxredefined-127261.aptible.in (Aptible, a HIPAA/ISO-certified PaaS), which is consistent with an inherited-infrastructure claim. Recorded as partial for that reason. - id: cms-dmepos-supplier-standards name: CMS DMEPOS Supplier Standards conforms: true evidence: url: https://rxredefined.com/platform/full-service quote: >- Product pages map each platform capability (Licensing, Educate/Prescribe/Order, Personal Performance Documentation, Supply Chain Services, Demographic Verification) to "DMEPOS Supplier Standards" and "Additional Regulatory Requirements". kind: provider-claim note: >- The domain standard for this market is the CMS DMEPOS Supplier Standards / Medicare enrollment regime, and the in-office ancillary services exception under the Stark Law. Rx Redefined markets the platform explicitly against those requirements. It is a prose claim on a marketing page, NOT a declaration inside a machine-readable contract, so it does not satisfy `domain_standard_conformance`, which reads the contract. domain_standard: applicable: true standard: CMS DMEPOS Supplier Standards (42 CFR 424.57) / in-office ancillary services exception declared_in_contract: false note: >- No contract exists to declare it in. Recorded so a future round does not re-litigate whether this market has a standard — it does; the provider simply publishes no contract.