generated: '2026-08-27' method: searched source: >- https://docs.segmind.com/docs/get-started/authentication, https://docs.segmind.com/docs/serverless-api, https://docs.segmind.com/docs/serverless-api/async-inference, https://www.segmind.com/pricing, https://docs.segmind.com/docs/serverless-api/logging, openapi/ in this repo summary: >- Segmind's gateway is a bespoke job API. It conforms to no cross-cutting HTTP API standard beyond plain REST-over-JSON, and its market — hosted generative-model inference — has no ratified domain standard to conform to, so the domain slot is genuinely empty rather than unmet. conformance: - id: oauth2 conforms: partial evidence: >- OAuth 2.0 authorization-code social login through Google, Microsoft and Discord is documented, with a standard token response ({access_token, refresh_token, expires_in}). Segmind additionally announced its own OAuth 2.1 authorization server on 2026-06-16 with endpoints under /oauth/. Marked partial because neither surface publishes RFC 8414 authorization-server metadata, a scope reference, or a registration flow — probed 2026-08-27, all /.well-known/oauth-* paths 404. source: https://docs.segmind.com/docs/get-started/authentication - id: oidc conforms: false evidence: >- No /.well-known/openid-configuration on any host (www, platform, api, docs — all 404), no JWKS endpoint, no id_token. JWTs are issued but as a proprietary session token with claims jti/exp/iat/nbf/identity. - id: rfc9457 conforms: false evidence: >- Errors are {"error": ""} with content-type application/json, not application/problem+json. No type/title/detail/instance members. 405 returns HTML. - id: rfc9116 conforms: false evidence: >- No /.well-known/security.txt on www.segmind.com, api.segmind.com, workflows-api.segmind.com, docs.segmind.com or platform.segmind.com — all probed 2026-08-27. - id: rfc8594 conforms: false evidence: >- No Sunset or Deprecation response headers are documented. Deprecation is announced in prose; retired models fail with 410 Gone at call time. - id: idempotency conforms: false evidence: >- Explicitly not supported. "Each POST /v2/{slug} creates a NEW request_id ... Never retry by re-POSTing after a successful submit — that starts a second billable job." No Idempotency-Key header, no client token, no dedupe window. source: https://docs.segmind.com/docs/serverless-api/async-inference#idempotency - id: pagination conforms: false evidence: >- No paginated collection is documented anywhere on the gateway. The API is job-shaped, not collection-shaped. - id: 'json:api' conforms: false evidence: Plain JSON objects; no JSON:API document structure, media type or links members. - id: odata conforms: false evidence: No $metadata surface and no OData query options. - id: scim conforms: false evidence: >- Teams and members are managed in the console only. No SCIM schema URN (urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:*) and no /scim/v2 surface appears in the docs. - id: webhooks conforms: partial evidence: >- Two live PixelFlow event types (NODE_RUN, GRAPH_RUN) are published, but with no payload schema, no signing secret, no retry policy and no AsyncAPI document. There is no webhook at all for plain gateway inference. See asyncapi/segmind-webhooks.yml. - id: openapi conforms: partial evidence: >- Segmind publishes no OpenAPI document of its own. Probed 2026-08-27: api.segmind.com/openapi.json, /openapi.yaml, /swagger.json, /api-docs, /docs and /redoc all return the gateway's 400 default; workflows-api.segmind.com/openapi.json returns 404; docs.segmind.com/openapi.json and www.segmind.com/openapi.json return 404 HTML shells. The specs under openapi/ in this repo were authored by API Evangelist from the published documentation, not harvested from the provider. - id: mcp conforms: false evidence: >- No MCP server. Segmind's OAuth 2.1 announcement names MCP clients as a target, but no endpoint, package or tools/list surface exists. See mcp/segmind-mcp.yml. - id: a2a conforms: false evidence: >- No agent card. /.well-known/agent-card.json and /.well-known/agent.json probed on www, api, workflows-api, docs, platform, cloud and api.spotprod — all 404, 400 or a 307 to a login. - id: llmstxt conforms: true evidence: >- Two distinct llms.txt documents are served, both HTTP 200 and both real markdown: https://www.segmind.com/llms.txt (136,909 bytes — the full model directory with per-model slug, modality, average cost and average latency, plus a per-model llms.txt convention at /models/{slug}/llms.txt) and https://docs.segmind.com/llms.txt (16,214 bytes — the documentation index), with https://docs.segmind.com/llms-full.txt (364,903 bytes) alongside it. This is the strongest agent-facing surface Segmind ships. domain_standard: applicable: false market: Hosted generative-model inference (image, video, audio, LLM) evidence: >- No ratified domain standard governs this market. The nearest de facto convention is an OpenAI-compatible /v1/chat/completions surface for LLM providers; Segmind does not declare one — its LLM models are called through the same POST /v1/{model} and POST /v2/{model} routes as its image and video models, with a documented {"prompt": "..."} shorthand rather than an OpenAI-shaped messages envelope. Recorded as not-applicable, not as a failure. compliance: published: true certifications: - name: SOC 2 status: claimed scope: Enterprise plan evidence: >- "SOC 2 compliance" is listed as a bullet on the Enterprise plan card of https://www.segmind.com/pricing. report_available: not stated trust_center: none note: >- A single-line marketing claim on a pricing card. There is no trust centre, no subprocessor list, no report request flow, and no attestation date or auditor named. trust.segmind.com does not resolve. Recorded as claimed, not verified. privacy: - name: Data handling evidence: >- The logging page states that input images, videos and audio are NOT stored, that prompts and configuration parameters ARE stored for caching, and that outputs are deleted after 7 days. source: https://docs.segmind.com/docs/serverless-api/logging gaps: - No trust centre or security page (www.segmind.com/security returns 404). - No ISO 27001, PCI, HIPAA, GDPR or FedRAMP claim published. - No vulnerability-disclosure policy, security.txt or bug-bounty programme found. - No DPA or subprocessor list linked from the public site. maintainers: - FN: Kin Lane email: kin@apievangelist.com