slug: slash provider: Slash generated_by: planning/capability-mapping/scripts/classify_capabilities.py model: claude-opus-5 frame: - Banking & Capital Markets min_confidence: 0.7 capability_model: source: https://github.com/vincentmakes/turbo-ea-capabilities license: CC-BY-4.0 attribution: Turbo EA Capabilities by Vincent Verdet — Turbo EA, https://github.com/vincentmakes/turbo-ea-capabilities, CC BY 4.0 notice: NOTICE edge_count: 7 edges: - tag: Developer Application spec_file: slash-developer-application-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-4270.40 capability_id_l1: BC-4270 capability_name: Developer Identity & Credential Management confidence: 0.85 evidence: POST /developer-application/{developerApplicationId}/secret — "Create or regenerate a DeveloperApplication's OAuthClientSecret" reason: Lifecycle of developer applications and OAuth client secrets is squarely developer identity and credential management. - tag: Invoice spec_file: slash-invoice-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-200.30 capability_id_l1: BC-200 capability_name: Accounts Receivable Management confidence: 0.8 evidence: POST /invoice; POST /invoice/{invoiceId}/void; POST /invoice/{invoiceId}/reconcile; POST /invoice/{invoiceId}/send-reminder reason: Customer invoice issuance, reminders, reconciliation and payment-method configuration is accounts receivable / customer invoicing. - tag: Developer Account spec_file: slash-developer-account-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-4270.40 capability_id_l1: BC-4270 capability_name: Developer Identity & Credential Management confidence: 0.78 evidence: POST /developer-account/{developerAccountId}/application — "Create a DeveloperApplication"; schema DeveloperApplication.PermissionKeyTypes.PermissionPolicyKey reason: Registers developer applications with permission policies — developer credential/identity administration for the API ecosystem, not a banking business capability. - tag: Card Group spec_file: slash-card-group-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-1340 capability_id_l1: BC-1340 capability_name: Payments & Card Management confidence: 0.75 evidence: POST /card-group; PUT /card-group/{cardGroupId}/spending-constraint; schemas SpendingConstraint, CardGroupUtilization reason: Operations create and administer groups of corporate cards with spending constraints and utilisation views — card programme administration within Payments & Card Management. Evidence does not clearly single out issuance vs transaction processing, so only the L1 is asserted. - tag: Transaction spec_file: slash-transaction-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-1340.70 capability_id_l1: BC-1340 capability_name: Card Transaction Processing Management confidence: 0.75 evidence: GET /transaction/{transactionId}/fee-details; schemas TransactionMerchant, TransactionCashbackInfo, Card, CardStatus, TransactionFxFeeInfo, TransactionDetailedStatus reason: Operations expose card transaction records with merchant, card, status, fee and FX-fee detail on a corporate card issuer's platform, i.e. card transaction processing/servicing. Some ambiguity as the surface is read-oriented (could be viewed as account transaction reporting), hence 0.75. - tag: Account spec_file: slash-account-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-1330.10 capability_id_l1: BC-1330 capability_name: Deposit Account Management confidence: 0.7 evidence: GET /account/{accountId}/balance; schemas "Account", "Balance", "Money" reason: Vendor provides business checking accounts; the tag exposes account retrieval and balance enquiry, which is demand-deposit/current-account information. Mapped to Deposit Account Management, with some ambiguity as part of the surface (authorization-webhook) is integration plumbing. - tag: Card spec_file: slash-card-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-1340.60 capability_id_l1: BC-1340 capability_name: Card Issuance Management confidence: 0.7 evidence: POST /card; "GET /card/{cardId}/utilization"; schemas "Card", "CardStatus", "SpendingConstraint" reason: Creates and manages virtual/physical corporate cards including status and spending constraints — card issuance and in-life card control, matching Card Issuance Management. Not transaction switching/authorisation, so .70 is a weaker fit; some ambiguity remains between the two sub-capabilities.