generated: '2026-09-02' method: searched source: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ docs: - https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ - https://warego.co/customer-support/connections-and-integrations/ note: >- WareGo publishes NO machine-readable contract (no OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, GraphQL, gRPC or WSDL was found on any host — see x-coverage in apis.yml). Every entry below is therefore a PROSE CLAIM made on WareGo's own marketing pages, recorded verbatim with the URL that states it. None of it could be verified against a contract, because there is no contract to read. `conforms` is set true only for claims WareGo states plainly about itself as a shipped, audited property; `conforms: false` marks claims that name a standard the platform is said to speak but which no published artifact confirms. conformance: - id: soc2-type-ii conforms: true claim: "SOC 2 Type II — Annually audited" evidence: url: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ status: 200 quote: "SOC 2 Type II / Annually audited" basis: provider-published claim; no attestation letter, trust center or report portal found - id: gdpr conforms: true claim: "GDPR-Ready — EU data compliant" evidence: url: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ status: 200 quote: "GDPR-Ready / EU data compliant" basis: provider-published claim on the 3PL WMS page; privacy policy at https://warego.co/privacy-policy/ (200) - id: tls13 conforms: true claim: "TLS 1.3 / AES-256 — in transit & at rest" evidence: url: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ status: 200 quote: "TLS 1.3 / AES-256 / In transit & at rest" basis: >- Independently corroborated for the web tier — the live TLS probe in security/warego-domain-security.yml negotiated TLSv1.3 on warego.co. At-rest encryption is a claim only. - id: saml-sso conforms: true claim: "SSO (SAML/OAuth) — Enterprise auth" evidence: url: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ status: 200 quote: "SSO (SAML/OAuth) / Enterprise auth" basis: >- Product-login claim, not an API auth model. No OAuth authorization-server metadata is served (/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server 404) and no scopes or token endpoints are documented, so scopes/ and authentication/ artifacts are deliberately NOT written. - id: rbac conforms: true claim: "Role-Based Access — Granular permissions" evidence: url: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ status: 200 quote: "Role-Based Access / Granular permissions" - id: audit-trail conforms: true claim: "Full Audit Trails — every change recorded" evidence: url: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ status: 200 quote: "Full Audit Trails" - id: rest conforms: false claim: "REST API" evidence: url: https://warego.co/customer-support/connections-and-integrations/ status: 200 quote: "WareGo provides Open APIs for smooth connectivity. Access API documentation to understand endpoints, authentication, and request structures." basis: >- Claimed but unverifiable. The support guide tells integrators to "access API documentation" and "set up API keys" but links to no reference, and step 3 routes the integrator to WareGo's product team instead. No endpoint, base URL, auth scheme or spec is published anywhere. - id: webhooks conforms: false claim: "Webhooks" evidence: url: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ status: 200 quote: "EDI & API ... REST API / Webhooks" basis: >- Named as a capability tile in an integration grid. No event catalog, payload schema, subscription endpoint or retry/signature policy is published, so no Webhooks pointer and no asyncapi/ artifact is emitted — a tile is not a documented event surface. - id: rfc9457 conforms: false claim: null evidence: basis: No error envelope is published; no problem+json media type observed. errors/ not written. domain_standards: - id: ansi-x12-edi name: ANSI ASC X12 EDI (supply-chain transaction sets) conforms: false claim: "EDI 850 PO, EDI 856 ASN, EDI 810 Invoice, EDI 940/944" transaction_sets: - code: '850' name: Purchase Order - code: '856' name: Advance Ship Notice (ASN) - code: '810' name: Invoice - code: '940' name: Warehouse Shipping Order - code: '944' name: Warehouse Stock Transfer Receipt Advice evidence: url: https://warego.co/industries/3pl-wms-software/ status: 200 quote: "EDI & API: EDI 850 PO, EDI 856 ASN, EDI 810 Inv, EDI 940/944, REST API, Webhooks" basis: >- This is the domain standard that matters in WMS/3PL — a buyer who already speaks X12 850/856/810/ 940/944 integrates with no bespoke connector. WareGo names the exact transaction sets, which is a stronger signal than a generic "EDI supported" badge. BUT `domain_standard_conformance` reads the CONTRACT, not a marketing page, and WareGo publishes no contract in which the declaration can be located. Recorded as claimed-but-unverified (conforms: false) rather than credited. Re-check this entry the moment WareGo publishes a spec. - id: sps-commerce-edi name: SPS Commerce EDI network conforms: false claim: SPS Commerce listed as a named integration evidence: url: https://warego.co/integrations/sps-commerce-integration/ status: 200 basis: >- Integration landing page exists; corroborates the X12 claim above as a delivery channel but is still a partner listing, not a conformance artifact.