generated: '2026-08-28'
method: probed
source: https://x.com/.well-known/security.txt
description: >-
  X operates a public vulnerability disclosure programme through HackerOne, advertised in a
  PGP-signed RFC 9116 security.txt served from the x.com root.
program:
  type: bug-bounty
  platform: HackerOne
  url: https://hackerone.com/twitter
  public: true
security_txt:
  url: https://x.com/.well-known/security.txt
  http_status: 200
  content_type: text/plain
  file: ../well-known/x-security.txt
  signed: true
  signature: OpenPGP clearsigned (SHA512)
  fields:
    Contact: https://hackerone.com/twitter
    Encryption: https://twitter.com/security/pgp-key.txt
    Canonical: https://twitter.com/.well-known/security.txt
    Expires: '2024-01-01T06:00:00.000Z'
    Hiring: https://careers.twitter.com
  policy_url: null
findings:
- severity: note
  finding: >-
    The served security.txt is past its own stated Expires date (2024-01-01). RFC 9116 says a
    researcher should not trust an expired document, so the file X serves today formally
    disclaims itself even though the HackerOne programme behind it is live.
- severity: note
  finding: >-
    Canonical, Encryption and Hiring all still point at twitter.com / careers.twitter.com
    rather than x.com — the document predates the rebrand.
- severity: note
  finding: >-
    No security.txt is served on the API or documentation hosts. api.x.com,
    developer.x.com and docs.x.com all 404 on /.well-known/security.txt, so a researcher
    starting from the API surface finds nothing.
- severity: note
  finding: 'No Policy: field is present, so there is no linked disclosure policy document.'
probes:
- url: https://x.com/.well-known/security.txt
  status: 200
- url: https://api.x.com/.well-known/security.txt
  status: 404
- url: https://developer.x.com/.well-known/security.txt
  status: 404
- url: https://docs.x.com/.well-known/security.txt
  status: 404