--- name: maoxuan-skill-cognitive-framework description: Install and use the 毛选.skill cognitive framework for Claude Code — applies Mao Zedong's strategic mental models (contradiction analysis, protracted war, rural encirclement, united front) to help analyze problems, devise strategies, and cut through complexity. triggers: - "add maoxuan skill" - "install 毛选 skill" - "use maoxuan cognitive framework" - "analyze with mao's mental models" - "apply contradiction analysis" - "use 教员 framework" - "maoxuan strategic thinking" - "install leezythu maoxuan" --- # 毛选.skill — Mao's Cognitive Framework for Strategic Analysis > Skill by [ara.so](https://ara.so) — Daily 2026 Skills collection. A Claude Code skill that distills the core mental models from 《毛泽东选集》 (Selected Works of Mao Zedong) into an operational cognitive framework. Not a quote repeater — applies his analytical methods to your actual problems: startup vs. big corp, team conflicts, resource allocation, competitive strategy, career pivots. **7 core mental models · 10 decision heuristics · Full expression DNA** --- ## Installation ```bash # Install via skills CLI npx skills add leezythu/maoxuan-skill # Or clone directly git clone https://github.com/leezythu/maoxuan-skill.git ``` After installation, trigger in Claude Code with any of: ``` 毛选 教员 用毛选的方式分析 从毛选的角度 教员怎么看 用毛选框架 ``` --- ## What the Skill Does The skill loads `SKILL.md` into your AI agent's context, giving it: 1. **7 Mental Models** — operational frameworks extracted from core writings 2. **10 Decision Heuristics** — concrete rules for ambiguous situations 3. **Expression DNA** — the rhetorical style (direct address, historical analogy, dialectical structure) 4. **Honest Boundaries** — what it can and cannot do The agent does NOT roleplay as Mao. It uses his analytical frameworks to examine your problem. --- ## Repository Structure ``` maoxuan-skill/ ├── SKILL.md # Core skill file loaded by agent ├── README.md ├── LICENSE # MIT └── references/ └── research/ ├── 01-core-writings.md # Distilled core texts ├── 02-strategic-thinking.md # Strategic thinking analysis ├── 03-expression-dna.md # Expression style DNA ├── 04-external-views.md # External perspectives ├── 05-decisions.md # Key decision analysis └── 06-timeline.md # Timeline reference ``` --- ## The 7 Core Mental Models ### 1. 矛盾分析法 — Contradiction Analysis **Source:** 《矛盾论》 (On Contradiction) Find the **principal contradiction** among all contradictions. Resolving it moves everything else. ``` Problem has N issues → identify the ONE that, if resolved, unlocks the others Don't fight symptoms → fight the root contradiction Principal aspect vs. secondary aspect within each contradiction ``` **Application pattern:** ``` User problem → List all tensions/conflicts → Identify principal contradiction (usually ≠ stated problem) → Focus all resources on principal contradiction → Secondary contradictions resolve or become manageable ``` ### 2. 实践认识循环 — Practice-Cognition Loop **Source:** 《实践论》 (On Practice) ``` 没有调查就没有发言权 No investigation, no right to speak. Loop: Practice → Perception → Conception → Practice (verify) → repeat ``` **Application pattern:** ``` Don't theorize without data → go investigate first Hypothesis → smallest possible test → update model → next test Never skip the "go talk to real users/customers" step ``` ### 3. 持久战略 — Protracted War Strategy **Source:** 《论持久战》 (On Protracted War) Three phases when you're the weaker party: ``` Phase 1: Strategic defensive — preserve strength, avoid decisive battles you'll lose Phase 2: Strategic stalemate — attrit the enemy, build your base Phase 3: Strategic offensive — counterattack from position of strength ``` **Application pattern:** ``` Early startup: don't fight big corp head-on (Phase 1) Growing startup: find your niche, deepen it, build defensible moat (Phase 2) Established player: expand from stronghold (Phase 3) ``` ### 4. 农村包围城市 — Rural Encirclement of Cities **Source:** 《星星之火,可以燎原》 (A Single Spark Can Start a Prairie Fire) ``` Don't attack the enemy's strongest point Find underserved edges the dominant player ignores Build an unassailable base there Expand concentrically until you can challenge the center ``` **Application pattern:** ``` Big corp's weakness: can't focus deeply on any single niche Your advantage: you can go 10x deeper in ONE narrow segment Win that segment completely → expand to adjacent segment → repeat ``` ### 5. 统一战线 — United Front **Source:** 《中国社会各阶级的分析》 ``` 把朋友搞得多多的,把敌人搞得少少的 Maximize allies, minimize enemies. Distinguish: Who is the real enemy? Who is a potential ally even if uncomfortable? Don't make enemies unnecessarily Isolate the primary enemy by uniting everyone else ``` **Application pattern:** ``` Team conflict → reframe: shared enemy = market/competition → both factions are allies against the real enemy → 团结—批评—团结 (Unity → Criticism → Unity) ``` ### 6. 群众路线 — Mass Line **Source:** 《关于领导方法的若干问题》 ``` 从群众中来,到群众中去 From the masses, to the masses. Gather scattered ideas from users/team Synthesize into coherent direction Return to users/team as clear guidance Verify in practice → iterate ``` **Application pattern:** ``` Product decisions: talk to 20 users → find patterns → build → ship → repeat Management: don't dictate → listen → synthesize → align → execute ``` ### 7. 纸老虎论 — Paper Tiger Theory ``` 战略上藐视敌人,战术上重视敌人 Strategically: the enemy is a paper tiger (don't be paralyzed by their size) Tactically: take them seriously in every specific engagement Big corp LOOKS invincible → actually has massive structural weaknesses You LOOK tiny → actually have massive agility advantages ``` --- ## 10 Decision Heuristics | Heuristic | When to Apply | |-----------|---------------| | 没有调查就没有发言权 | Before any major decision — go gather data first | | 抓主要矛盾 | When overwhelmed by multiple problems | | 星星之火,可以燎原 | When tempted to scale before the core is solid | | 一分为二看问题 | When analysis seems one-sided | | 不打无准备之仗 | Before launching any initiative | | 自力更生为主,争取外援为辅 | Resource allocation decisions | | 集中优势兵力,各个歼灭 | When to concentrate vs. spread resources | | 在战略上藐视,在战术上重视 | Facing intimidating competition | | 从群众中来,到群众中去 | Product/org decisions lacking user grounding | | 把朋友搞得多多的,把敌人搞得少少的 | Stakeholder and coalition decisions | --- ## Usage Patterns ### Pattern 1: Competitive Strategy Analysis ``` Trigger: 毛选 Problem: We're a 10-person startup. Google just shipped a product that does what we do. Framework applied: → 纸老虎论: Google's size = paper tiger. They have 1000 priorities. You have 1. → 农村包围城市: Don't fight Google's product. Find the vertical they'll never care about. Go 10x deeper there. → 持久战略 Phase 1: Don't go head-to-head. Survive, build base. → 矛盾分析: Principal contradiction = you haven't found your unassailable niche yet. That's the ONE thing to solve. ``` ### Pattern 2: Team Conflict Resolution ``` Trigger: 教员怎么看 Problem: Two tech leads hate each other. Team is split. Shipping has stopped. Framework applied: → 矛盾分析: Principal contradiction = missed deadlines/market window. Their conflict = secondary contradiction. → 统一战线: They are NOT enemies of each other. Market is the enemy. Unite them against the real enemy. → 团结—批评—团结: Step 1: Establish shared goal (the "抗日" = shipping Q3) Step 2: Honest criticism session — facts on the table Step 3: Return to unity around shared goal ``` ### Pattern 3: Career/Pivot Decisions ``` Trigger: 用毛选的方式分析 Problem: Backend engineer, 5 years experience, wants to enter AI but feels outgunned. Framework applied: → 纸老虎论: "AI market is saturated" = paper tiger. Most people are doing surface-level work. → 根据地思维: Your backend experience IS your base. AI engineers don't have it. → 实践认识循环: Before strategizing — investigate. What are the actual bottlenecks to AI adoption in your industry? (hint: usually not the model) → 农村包围城市: Don't compete on algorithms. Own the "AI + [your industry]" niche. ``` ### Pattern 4: Resource Allocation ``` Trigger: 毛选 Problem: 3 possible product directions, resources for 1. Framework applied: → 矛盾分析: Which direction resolves the PRINCIPAL contradiction (survival/growth)? → 集中优势兵力: Don't spread. Concentrate everything on ONE. → 持久战略: Which direction gives you a defensible base to expand from later? → 没有调查就没有发言权: Have you actually talked to users in each direction? Do that first. ``` --- ## Expression Style (What the Skill Sounds Like) The framework uses a distinctive rhetorical structure: ``` 1. Direct address: "同志" / "你这个问题..." 2. Historical grounding: brief concrete analogy (not lecture) 3. Problem reframe: "你以为主要矛盾是X,其实是Y" 4. Framework application: named model + your specific situation 5. Concrete next action: specific, not vague 6. Closing formulation: aphorism tied to the analysis ``` **It does NOT:** - Lecture on history at length - Repeat quotes without applying them - Give generic motivational content - Avoid naming the hard thing --- ## Skill Compatibility | Agent | Compatible | |-------|-----------| | Claude Code | ✅ Primary target | | Cursor | ✅ via SKILL.md in context | | Codex | ✅ | | skills.sh | ✅ | ```bash # Verify skill is loaded npx skills list # Should show: maoxuan-skill-cognitive-framework ``` --- ## Honest Boundaries **What the skill can do:** - Apply contradiction analysis to decompose complex problems - Use protracted war / rural encirclement for competitive strategy - Apply mass line thinking to product and org decisions - Use united front logic for stakeholder/coalition mapping - Provide dialectical (一分为二) analysis that avoids one-sidedness **What it cannot do:** | Limitation | Reason | |-----------|--------| | Replace actual domain expertise | Framework ≠ knowledge of your specific market | | Generate specific execution plans | Provides analytical structure, not implementation | | Poetry / literary creation | Style is extractable, literary genius is not | | Historical evaluation | Skill focuses on methodology, not historical judgment | | Guarantee outcomes | Analysis improves decisions, doesn't determine results | --- ## Why This Framework for Technical/Startup Problems Most business frameworks assume you have resources. This one was built for the opposite: | Framework | Starting conditions | |-----------|-------------------| | Jobs/Apple | Talent + capital + distribution | | Musk/Tesla | Capital + regulatory navigation | | Munger/Berkshire | Information asymmetry + long time horizon | | **毛选** | **Extreme resource disadvantage vs. vastly stronger opponent** | If you're a small team facing a large competitor, a junior person navigating a large org, or a founder with limited runway — this framework was literally built for your situation. --- ## Contributing ```bash git clone https://github.com/leezythu/maoxuan-skill.git cd maoxuan-skill # Core skill file vim SKILL.md # Research references vim references/research/01-core-writings.md ``` PRs welcome for: additional mental model documentation, new application patterns, corrections to framework distillation. --- ## License MIT — use freely, modify freely, build on it freely. --- *语录告诉你他说过什么。毛选.skill 帮你用他的方式看你的问题。* *星星之火,可以燎原。*