--- name: "ops-negotiation" description: "Apply principled negotiation using BATNA, ZOPA, and the Harvard method to prepare for and conduct negotiations. Use this skill when the user needs to prepare for a negotiation, evaluate their bargaining position, design win-win solutions, or handle difficult negotiation situations — even if they say 'how do I negotiate this deal', 'what's my leverage', 'they won't budge on price', or 'help me prepare for this meeting'." metadata: category: "WP-21 設計/資訊/傳播/公衛" tags: ["negotiation", "batna", "conflict-resolution"] --- # Negotiation (Harvard Method) ## Framework ``` IRON LAW: Know Your BATNA Before Entering Any Negotiation BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) is your walkaway power. If you don't know your BATNA, you don't know when to walk away — and you'll either accept a bad deal or reject a good one. Calculate your BATNA and the other side's BATNA before the negotiation starts. ``` ### Core Concepts | Concept | Definition | |---------|-----------| | **BATNA** | Your best option if negotiation fails — your walkaway point | | **ZOPA** | Zone of Possible Agreement — overlap between both parties' acceptable ranges | | **Reservation price** | The worst deal you'd accept (set by your BATNA) | | **Aspiration price** | The best deal you realistically hope for | ### Harvard Principled Negotiation (4 Principles) 1. **Separate people from the problem**: Address emotions and relationship separately from substantive issues. Be hard on the problem, soft on the person. 2. **Focus on interests, not positions**: Positions are what people SAY they want. Interests are WHY they want it. "I want $100K salary" (position) vs "I need financial security and recognition of my expertise" (interests). 3. **Invent options for mutual gain**: Expand the pie before dividing it. Brainstorm solutions that satisfy both parties' interests. 4. **Use objective criteria**: Base agreements on fair standards (market rates, precedent, expert opinion) rather than who has more power. ### Negotiation Preparation Checklist 1. **Your BATNA**: What's your best alternative if this fails? 2. **Their BATNA**: What's their best alternative? (weakens as their BATNA worsens) 3. **Your interests**: Why do you want what you want? (list all, prioritize) 4. **Their interests**: Why do they want what they want? (estimate, research) 5. **ZOPA**: Is there overlap? If not, no deal is possible — focus on improving BATNA. 6. **Options**: What creative solutions could satisfy both parties' interests? 7. **Objective criteria**: What external standards can anchor the discussion? 8. **First offer strategy**: Anchor high (if you speak first) or counter-anchor (if they go first) ### Tactics for Difficult Situations | Situation | Tactic | |-----------|--------| | They won't move | Ask "why" to uncover underlying interests | | They use threats | Acknowledge the threat without reacting; redirect to interests | | They anchor extremely | Counter-anchor with your own extreme (but justifiable) number | | Deadlock | Take a break, change the negotiator, or introduce a mediator | | They say "take it or leave it" | Test it — they usually don't mean it. Offer a concession and ask for one back | ## Output Format ```markdown # Negotiation Prep: {Situation} ## Position Analysis | Element | You | Other Party | |---------|-----|-------------| | BATNA | {your alternative} | {their alternative, estimated} | | Reservation price | {your walkaway} | {their walkaway, estimated} | | Aspiration price | {your ideal} | {their ideal, estimated} | | ZOPA | {overlap range, if any} | ## Interests (not positions) | Your Interests (priority) | Their Interests (estimated) | |--------------------------|---------------------------| | 1. {interest} | 1. {interest} | | 2. ... | 2. ... | ## Creative Options 1. {option that satisfies both parties' top interests} 2. {option} ## Objective Criteria - {market benchmark, precedent, or standard that supports your position} ## Strategy - Opening: {first move} - Concessions: {what you're willing to give and in what order} - Walkaway signal: {when to leave the table} ``` ## Gotchas - **Anchoring is powerful**: The first number spoken heavily influences the final outcome. If you can anchor first with a justified extreme, do so. - **Interests are often compatible**: Two parties fighting over one orange may both be satisfied if one wants the peel (for baking) and the other wants the juice. Ask "why" before assuming zero-sum. - **BATNA improves with preparation**: Your BATNA isn't fixed. Before negotiating, improve it — get competing offers, develop alternatives, reduce switching costs. - **Concessions should be reciprocal**: Never give a concession without asking for something in return. Unilateral concessions signal weakness. - **Cultural negotiation styles vary**: Direct (US, Israel) vs indirect (Japan, Taiwan) vs relationship-first (Middle East). Match your approach to the cultural context. ## References - For multi-party negotiation tactics, see `references/multi-party.md`