A View From Here -- Deb Weiss
A VIEW FROM HERE
by deb weiss


Peter Singer's The Hell Curve
September 9, 1999


In 1994, sociologist Charles Murray and the late Richard Herrnstein published "The Bell Curve," a provocative study of race and IQ.

It was an instant outrage. You'd have had to spend the next few months holed up in a bunker to miss the incendiary headlines and radioactive sound-bites.

Murray and Herrnstein drew fire on several fronts. Even the book's defenders admitted that its conclusions were marred by weird statistical leaps. Besides, Murray -- a libertarian provocateur -- was already on the establishment hit-list, mostly for his work on welfare reform.

EMAIL: DEB WEISS
Rejecting the conventional wisdom, Murray and Herrnstein claimed IQ itself was a critical predictor of success. They raised hackles with their take on 'nature-versus-nurture,' declaring that intelligence is genetically determined, with 60% of measurable IQ innate and fixed.

Their most explosive claims, though, were those linking IQ and race. Using questionable techniques, they concluded that on average, 'black' IQ was about 15 points lower than 'white' IQ. What's more, they insisted, the difference was immutable.

This was a staggering polemic. Even if their methods had not been flawed, they wildly overstated the significance of 'race' (generally considered too vague a concept to be scientifically useful).

Yet despite its defects, their study raised serious and interesting questions about some of our most fundamental assumptions. It deserved a hearing.

It didn't get one, though. Instead, the left's efficient smear machine kicked in.

Since Herrnstein had died before the book came out, Murray took the hit alone. They savaged him for everything from methodology to ideology, then gleefully dredged up ugly whispers about his personal life.

Above all, Murray was assailed for the sin of 'racism.' It did him no good whatever to deny this toxic charge: he was tarred, feathered, run out of town on a rail, hung and buried -- then dragged back into the public square so the mob could do it all over again.

**********


Flash forward to the summer of 1999, and the appointment of Peter Singer as Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University.

Dr. Singer, philosopher, activist and animal rights guru, exists to push the envelope on issues of life, death, and what's for dinner.

In his view, it's immoral to eat a steak, but eminently moral to abort a baby (especially a 'defective' one) or euthanize an Alzheimer's sufferer -- though not, interestingly, his own mother, profoundly disabled by Alzheimer's. According to a recent, reverent New Yorker profile by Michael Specter, Singer, like many a good son, spends a small fortune to ensure that she's tenderly provided for.

Perhaps he feels it's other people's mothers who should be put to sleep.

As Specter notes, Singer believes it's more ethical to perform laboratory research on "hopelessly disabled, unconscious orphans than on perfectly healthy rats." He regards animals as potential 'persons' with claims equal to those of humans, saying, "The notion that human life is sacred just because it's human life is medieval."

You can't escape the sense that Singer is Jack Kevorkian in pedants' clothing -- upscale, polished, minus the visible madness: even rather charming, bracketing his eerie rants in pieties about suffering, justice, and income redistribution. This doubtless accounts for his friendly reception by the establishment press.

Mind you, his appointment sparked considerable outrage -- just nothing quite as public as the furor produced by "The Bell Curve." His critics include pro-lifers, advocates for the disabled, theologians -- easily marginalized as 'right-wingers' or 'religious nuts', or simply 'nuts.' Their views are rarely permitted uncensored into the public forum.

Dr. Singer is well-protected from the vulgar herd.

His appointment delights progressives, who celebrate at least partly -- you can't help thinking -- because it's such a wickedly delicious way to stick a needle in the eye of the right.

Or maybe, in the dark recesses of their progressive souls, they count on Singer to produce a moral justification for euthanizing conservatives.

Either way, they applaud his appointment, starchily insisting that even controversial views deserve a public hearing.

Yes. Indeed. These are the very people who moved heaven and earth to silence Dr. Murray ("no free speech for fascists!"): but never mind. It's quite a point of view.

Still, even progressives must concede that controversy shouldn't automatically be rewarded with prestigious and handsomely-paid tenured appointments at America's great universities -- especially when the controversy involves a man who once said, without apology: "Killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Very often it is not wrong at all."

This notion may not be 'racism,' but surely it deserves at least a shadowy niche in the chamber of horrors, instead of an endowed chair and worldly honors at Princeton University.



A VIEW FROM HERE archive


Pat And The Poor Old Elephant -- September 6, 1999

Some Kind of Heroes: Mumia, Soliah, Et Al -- September 2, 1999

Being Janet Reno -- August 30, 1999

The Ghost At Our Banquet -- August 26, 1999

Solving Maleness -- August 23, 1999

The Media: A Nose Like a Vacuum Cleaner -- August 19, 1999

A Voter's Guide To The 21st Century -- August 16, 1999

A Good Town -- August 12, 1999

Singing The Praises Of Government News -- August 9, 1999

The First Couple's Chamber Pot -- August 5, 1999

Lifetime's Woman of the Year -- August 2, 1999

Thinking Over This Tax Cut Thing -- July 29, 1999

The John John Show -- July 26, 1999

America's One China, Two Alka Seltzer Policy -- July 22, 1999

The Politics of Speaking Ill of the Dead -- July 19, 1999

The Nasty Legacy -- July 15, 1999

All in a Slow News Week... -- July 12, 1999

Traps For The Young -- July 8, 1999

Remembering Michael Dukakis -- July 5, 1999

R.I.P., O.I.C. -- July 1, 1999

Mr. Clinton's Post-War Vengeance -- June 28, 1999

Guns, Cuisinarts and the Bill of Rights -- June 24, 1999

Attack of the Concerned Advocates -- June 21, 1999

FTC Nation -- June 17, 1999

The Very, Very Coincidental World of Bill and Hillary Clinton -- June 14, 1999

Water-boiling in Our Time -- June 10, 1999

Crisis and Peace -- June 7, 1999

Reinventing God -- June 3, 1999

On This Memorial Day -- May 31, 1999

The Un-McCarthy Era -- May 27, 1999

Unspeakable Spin -- May 25, 1999