Backgrounder: Rural EZ/EC Program
Round I Designations
The Community Empowerment Program was enacted into law in August 1993. In January 1994, President Clinton announced the opening of competition for Round I designations. To be eligible, communities had to have high rates of poverty. Their applications consisted of comprehensive strategic plans that were developed with the active participation of low-income community residents.
In December 1994, three rural Empowerment Zones (EZ) and 30 rural Enterprise Communities (EC) were named. Urban EZs and ECs were named at the same time. Rural EZs received grants of $40 million and rural ECs received special EZ/EC grants of just under $3 million from the Social Services Block Grants (SSBG) program administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. Urban EZs received $100 million; urban ECs received the same amount as rural ECs.
Round I Accomplishments
Round I rural EZs and ECs have made considerable progress in implementing their 10-year strategic plans since December 1994. Using a Web-based information system, rural communities established performance benchmarks against which their progress is measured and report on their progress. By 1998, already their record of achievement was impressive, including almost 10,000 jobs created or saved, 14,000 workers trained, 25,000 youth served, and 102 water or waste treatment systems under construction. A progress report detailing these accomplishments is available on the EZ/EC Web site at http://www.ezec.gov/Communit/progress98.pdf.
Even those communities that could not be designated in Round I were winners, as a result of USDA’s Champion Communities program. Many Champions continued to implement their strategic plans with the assistance of USDA, which provided project-specific funding, technical assistance, and information to support their efforts. Since 1994, USDA Rural Development has funded nearly $260 million in specific projects in Champion Communities for such things as water and waste disposal systems, other essential community facilities, business development, and housing.
Round II
Round II was enacted into law by the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. That act established 15 new urban and 5 new rural Empowerment Zones. The eligibility requirements for Round II were somewhat changed from Round I. A simpler method of determining poverty was adopted. Indian reservation lands were made eligible for Round II (they had been excluded by statute from Round I), and one new rural Zone could be designated based on population "emigration." The act did not appropriate grant funds as had been available to Round I EZs and ECs, but did make available a package of tax benefits that was somewhat less generous than the Round I package. The Administration sought full funding for the Round II Zones at the same level as Round I. Based on that proposal, competition for Round II designations was announced on April 16, 1998, with an application deadline of October 9. In October, Congress appropriated first year grants of $2 million to each of the 5 rural Zones and authorized an additional 20 rural Enterprise Communities and provided them with $250,000 in first year funding.
USDA received 169 applications prior to the October 9 deadline. Of these, 9 were declared ineligible. The remaining 160 applications were reviewed by an inter-departmental team of experts. The reviews considered the openness of the strategic planning process, the comprehensiveness of the strategic plan, the effectiveness of the performance benchmarks, the extent to which community residents will be an active part of plan implementation, and the geographic diversity of the applicants. On the whole, the strategic plans received were of exceptionally high quality. The applicants included 19 Round I Enterprise Communities that sought to be upgraded to Empowerment Zone status. In addition, they included 58 Round I Champion Communities and at least 28 communities that included Indian reservation lands either wholly or partially.
The statute authorizing Round II ECs was not specific regarding the date or process by which they were to be designated. However, because of the great expense to communities and the government of conducting another national competition when a large number of high quality strategic plans were already on hand, Secretary Glickman decided to name all 25 Round II EZs and ECs at this time, rather than delay implementation of their strategic plans for another 9-12 months.
The five new rural EZs have a combined total of 83,849 residents. The average poverty rate in the four poverty-based EZs is over 37 percent. Shannon County, SD, which is included in the Oglala Sioux Empowerment Zone, is the poorest county in the United States. Lake Aggasiz, ND, qualified on the basis of population "emigration," which was approximately 25 percent during 1980-95. The five rural EZs range in area from 449 square miles (Southernmost Illinois Empowerment Zone) to 1,000 square miles (Oglala Sioux Empowerment Zone). By comparison, the state of Rhode Island has an area of 1,054 square miles. Their population ranges from 3,396 (Lake Aggasiz Empowerment Zone) to 23,900 (Southwest Georgia United Empowerment Zone).
Altogether, the 25 Round II EZs and ECs have an average poverty rate of just under 35 percent. They average 15,349 residents, with Metlakatla, AK, being the smallest (1,469 residents) and Middle Rio Grande, TX, the most populous (29,724). The 25 communities average 560 square miles in size, with 8 having more than 900 square miles. The smallest is Lewiston, ME, which has 1 square mile. In addition to the Lake Aggasiz Empowerment Zone, one EC (Wichita County, KS) based its eligibility on emigration rather than poverty.
One Round I Enterprise Community (Southwest Georgia United Empowerment Zone) was upgraded to Round II Empowerment Zone status. Two of the new rural EZs and 9 of the new ECs were Round I Champion Communities. Two of the new EZs (Oglala Sioux Empowerment Zone, SD, and Desert Community Empowerment Zone, CA) include Indian reservation lands. Eight of the new ECs also include reservation lands.
Round II EZ/EC grants will be administered by USDA Rural Development and will be available to the winning communities later in 1999, as soon as implementing regulations are published.
USDA will also offer Champion Community status to all Round II applicant communities who agree to enter into an agreement with USDA to implement their strategic plans in accord with the principles of the Community Empowerment program and report regularly on progress in achieving their performance benchmarks.
USDA EZ/EC Team at 202-619-7980 or 1-800-645-4712
Reporters Bldg., Room 701
300 7th St., SW.
Washington, D.C. 20024
E-mail: ocd@ocdx.usda.govWebsite: http://www.ezec.gov
The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information should contact the USDA Office of Communications at (202) 720-7807 (TDD). To file a complaint, write: Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250, or call (202) 720-7327 (voice) or (202) 720- 1127 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer.
January 11, 1999
About this Initiative . . . Feedback . . . EZ/EC Home Page