--- name: biomarker-pathway-analysis description: Use when a researcher needs to analyze biological pathways for biomarker discovery, map disease mechanisms to druggable targets using Reactome/KEGG, identify pathway enrichment from gene sets, or understand mechanism-of-action for candidate biomarkers. --- # Biomarker Pathway Analysis ## When to use this skill - Researcher asks which pathways a gene/biomarker belongs to - Identify druggable targets within a disease pathway - Map metagene clusters to biological mechanisms - Understand mechanism-of-action for candidate biomarkers - Perform pathway enrichment analysis on a gene set ## MCP Server: `biomni-research` Pathway analysis uses the `biomni-research` MCP server. Tools are discovered automatically — ask your question naturally and Claude will find the right tool. ## Workflow: Pathway-Based Biomarker Discovery ### Step 1: Identify the gene set of interest Sources for gene sets: - Output from `biomarker-database-analysis` (top genes by p-value) - Known cancer driver genes (e.g., EGFR, KRAS, TP53, BRCA1/2) - Metagene clusters from expression analysis - Differentially expressed genes from cohort comparison ### Step 2: Query pathway databases Use the `biomni-research` server with natural language queries: | Goal | Query approach | |------|---------------| | Find pathways for a gene | "EGFR signaling pathways in Reactome" | | Find disease pathways | "pathways involved in non-small cell lung cancer" | | Get pathway interactions | "protein interaction network for CDK4" via STRING | | Validate drug targets | "CDK4 drug target tractability" via Open Targets | | Cross-reference function | "CDK4 molecular function and biological process" via UniProt | ### Step 3: Map pathway hierarchy Reactome organizes pathways hierarchically. Navigate from broad to specific: ``` Top-level: Signal Transduction -> RAS signaling -> KRAS activation -> Downstream effectors (RAF, MEK, ERK) ``` Decision tree for pathway depth: - **Broad overview needed** -> Query top-level pathways only - **Mechanism-of-action** -> Drill into sub-pathways with specific reactions - **Drug target identification** -> Find terminal nodes with known inhibitors ### Step 4: Identify druggable targets in pathway For each pathway hit, assess druggability: 1. Query Open Targets for tractability assessment: - Small molecule tractable - Antibody tractable - Other modalities (PROTAC, gene therapy) 2. Check existing drugs: - Approved drugs targeting this pathway node - Clinical trial compounds (Phase I-III) - Tool compounds for validation 3. Prioritize by: - Distance from disease-associated node (closer = better) - Number of approved drugs (validated target) - Safety profile of existing modulators ### Step 5: Build pathway-to-biomarker rationale Connect pathway findings back to biomarker candidates: ``` Gene (biomarker candidate) -> Pathway membership (Reactome) -> Disease relevance (pathway implicated in condition) -> Mechanistic explanation (how gene contributes to disease) -> Clinical utility (can measure this to stratify patients) ``` ## Pathway Analysis Patterns **EGFR pathway in NSCLC:** - Query: EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, HER2, RET - Pathways: RTK signaling, RAS-MAPK, PI3K-AKT-mTOR - Biomarker implication: Mutation status predicts TKI response **Metagene cluster interpretation:** - Cluster of co-expressed genes -> query each for pathway membership - Identify shared pathways -> that pathway drives the co-expression - Example: GDF15, POSTN, VCAN cluster -> TGF-beta / extracellular matrix remodeling **Survival-associated pathway enrichment:** 1. Take top 10 genes by Cox regression p-value 2. Query Reactome for each gene 3. Count pathway overlaps (enrichment) 4. Pathways with 3+ genes = significantly enriched ## Decision Framework: When to Use Pathway Analysis | Scenario | Recommended approach | |----------|---------------------| | Single gene of interest | Query Reactome + UniProt for function context | | Gene panel (5-20 genes) | Pathway enrichment: find shared pathways | | Drug target validation | Open Targets tractability + existing drugs | | Mechanism explanation | Full pathway walk: gene -> pathway -> disease | | Novel biomarker discovery | Combine pathway + expression + survival data | ## Conventions - Always report pathway evidence level (curated vs. inferred) - Include Reactome stable IDs (R-HSA-xxxxx) for reproducibility - For STRING interactions, use confidence threshold >= 0.7 (high confidence) - When multiple pathways match, rank by: disease relevance > gene count > evidence level - Cross-reference pathway findings with literature (PubMed) for validation