The deployment diagram
OpenStack Neat is a project intended to provide an extension to OpenStack implementing dynamic consolidation of Virtual Machines (VMs) using live migration. The major objective of dynamic VM consolidation is to improve the utilization of physical resources and reduce energy consumption by re-allocating VMs using live migration according to their real-time resource demand and switching idle hosts to the sleep mode. For example, assume that two VMs are placed on two different hosts, but the combined resource capacity required by the VMs to serve the current load can be provided by just one of the hosts. Then, one of the VMs can be migrated to the host serving the other VM, and the idle host can be switched to a low power mode to save energy.
Apart from consolidating VMs, the system should be able to react to increases in the resource demand and deconsolidate VMs when necessary to avoid performance degradation. In general, the problem of dynamic VM consolidation can be split into 4 sub-problems:
This work is conducted within the Cloud Computing and Distributed Systems (CLOUDS) Laboratory at the University of Melbourne. The problem of dynamic VM consolidation considering Quality of Service (QoS) constraints has been studied from the theoretical perspective and algorithms addressing the sub-problems listed above have been proposed [1], [2]. The algorithms have been evaluated using CloudSim and real-world workload traces collected from more than a thousand PlanetLab VMs hosted on servers located in more than 500 places around the world.
The aim of the OpenStack Neat project is to provide an extensible framework for dynamic consolidation of VMs based on the OpenStack platform. The framework should provide an infrastructure enabling the interaction of components implementing the 4 decision-making algorithms listed above. The framework should allow configuration-driven switching of different implementations of the decision-making algorithms. The implementation of the framework will include the algorithms proposed in our previous works [1], [2].
The functionality covered by this project will be implemented in the form of services separate from the core OpenStack services. The services of this project will interact with the core OpenStack services using their public APIs. It will be required to create a new Keystone user within the service tenant. The project will also require a new MySQL database for storing historical data on the resource usage by VMs. The project will provide a script for automated initialization of the database. The services provided by the project will need to be run on the management as well as compute hosts.
The problem of data center operation is high energy consumption, which has risen by 56% from 2005 to 2010, and in 2010 accounted to be between 1.1% and 1.5% of the global electricity use [3]. Apart from high operating costs, this results in substantial carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which are estimated to be 2% of the global emissions [4]. The problem has been partially addressed by improvements in the physical infrastructure of modern data centers. As reported by the Open Compute Project, Facebook’s Oregon data center achieves a Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) of 1.08, which means that approximately 93% of the data center’s energy consumption are consumed by the computing resources. Therefore, now it is important to focus on the resource management aspect, i.e. ensuring that the computing resources are efficiently utilized to serve applications.
Dynamic consolidation of VMs has been shown to be efficient in improving the utilization of data center resources and reducing energy consumption, as demonstrated by numerous studies [5–16]. In this project, we aim to implement an extensible framework for dynamic VM consolidation specifically targeted at the OpenStack platform.
The deployment diagram
The system is composed of a number of components and data stores, some of which are deployed on the compute hosts, and some on the management host (Figure 1). In the following sections, we discuss the design and interaction of the components, as well as the specification of the data stores, and available configuration options.
As shown in Figure 1, the system is composed of three main components:
The global manager: a sequence diagram
The global manager is deployed on the management host and is responsible for making VM placement decisions and initiating VM migrations. It exposes a REST web service, which accepts requests from local managers. The global manager processes only one type of requests – reallocation of a set of VM instances. As shown in Figure 2, once a request is received, the global manager invokes a VM placement algorithm to determine destination hosts to migrate the VMs to. Once a VM placement is determined, the global manager submits a request to the Nova API to migrate the VMs. The global manager is also responsible for switching idle hosts to the sleep mode, as well as re-activating hosts when necessary.
The global manager is agnostic of a particular implementation of the VM placement algorithm in use. The VM placement algorithm to use can be specified in the configuration file described later using the algorithm_vm_placement option. A VM placement algorithm can call the Nova API to obtain the information about host characteristics and current VM placement. If necessary, it can also query the central database to obtain the historical information about the resource usage by the VMs.
The global manager exposes a REST web service (REST API) for accepting VM migration requests from local managers. The service URL is defined according to configuration options defined in /etc/neat/neat.conf, which is discussed further in the paper. The two relevant options are:
global_manager_host – the name of the host running the global manager;global_manager_port – the port of the REST web service exposed by the global manager.The service URL is composed as follows:
http://<global_manager_host>:<global_manager_port>/Since the global manager processes only a single type of requests, it exposes only one resource: /. The resource is accessed using the PUT method, which initiates a VM reallocation process. This service requires the following parameters:
admin_tenant_name – the admin tenant name of Neat’s admin user registered in Keystone. In this context, this parameter is not used to authenticate in any OpenStack service, rather it is used to authenticate the client making a request as being allowed to access the web service.admin_user – the admin user name of Neat’s admin user registered in Keystone. In this context, this parameter is not used to authenticate in any OpenStack service, rather it is used to authenticate the client making a request as being allowed to access the web service.admin_password – the admin password of Neat’s admin user registered in Keystone. In this context, this parameter is not used to authenticate in any OpenStack service, rather it is used to authenticate the client making a request as being allowed to access the web service.vm_uuids – a coma-separated list of UUIDs of the VMs required to be migrated.reason – an integer specifying the resource for migration: 0 – underload, 1 – overload.If the provided credentials are correct and the vm_uuids parameter includes a list of UUIDs of existing VMs in the correct format, the service responses with the HTTP status code 200 OK.
The service uses standard HTTP error codes to response in cases of errors detected. The following error codes are used:
400 – bad input parameter: incorrect or missing parameters;401 – unauthorized: user credentials are missing;403 – forbidden: user credentials do not much the ones specified in the configuration file;405 – method not allowed: the request is made with a method other than the only supported PUT;422 – unprocessable entity: one or more VMs could not be found using the list of UUIDs specified in the vm_uuids parameter.One of the main features required to be supported by the hardware in order to take advantage of dynamic VM consolidation to save energy is Wake-on-LAN. This technology allows a computer being in the sleep (Suspend to RAM) mode to be re-activated by sending a special packet over network. This technology has been introduced in 1997 by the Advanced Manageability Alliance (AMA) formed by Intel and IBM, and is currently supported by most of the modern hardware.
Once the required VM migrations are completed, the global manager connects to the source host and switches into in the Suspend to RAM mode. Switching to the Suspend to RAM mode can be done, for example, using programs included in the pm-utils package. To check whether the Suspend to RAM mode is supported, the following command can be used:
pm-is-supported --suspendThe Suspend to RAM mode is supported if the command returns 0, otherwise it is not supported. In this case, the Suspend to RAM mode can be replaced with the Standby or Suspend to Disk (Hibernate) modes. The following command can be used to switch the host into the Suspend to RAM mode:
pm-suspendTo re-activate a host using the Wake-on-LAN technology, it is necessary to send a special packet, called the magic packet. This can be done using the ether-wake program as follows:
ether-wake <mac address>Where <mac address> is replaced with the actual MAC address of the host.
The local manager: an activity diagram
The local manager component is deployed on every compute host and is invoked periodically to determine when it necessary to reallocate VM instances from the host. A high-level view of the workflow performed by the local manager is shown in Figure 3. First of all, it reads from the local storage the historical data on the resource usage by VMs stored by the data collector described in the next section. Then, the local manager invokes the specified in the configuration underload detection algorithm to determine whether the host is underloaded. If the host is underloaded, the local manager sends a request to the global manager’s REST API to migrate all the VMs from the host and switch the host to the sleep mode.
If the host is not underloaded, the local manager proceeds to invoking the specified in the configuration overload detection algorithm. If the host is overloaded, the local manager invokes the configured VM selection algorithm to select the VMs to migrate from the host. Once the VMs to migrate from the host are selected, the local manager sends a request to the global manager’s REST API to migrate the selected VMs from the host.
Similarly to the global manager, the local manager can be configured to use specific underload detection, overload detection, and VM selection algorithm using the configuration file discussed further in the paper.
Underload detection is done by a specified in the configuration underload detection algorithm (algorithm_underload_detection). The algorithm has a pre-defined interface, which allows substituting different implementations of the algorithm. The configured algorithm is invoked by the local manager and accepts historical data on the resource usage by VMs running on the host as an input. An underload detection algorithm returns a decision of whether the host is underloaded.
Overload detection is done by a specified in the configuration overload detection algorithm (algorithm_overload_detection). Similarly to underload detection, all overload detection algorithms implement a pre-defined interface to enable configuration-driven substitution of difference implementations. The configured algorithm is invoked by the local manager and accepts historical data on the resource usage by VMs running on the host as an input. An overload detection algorithm returns a decision of whether the host is overloaded.
If a host is overloaded, it is necessary to select VMs to migrate from the host to avoid performance degradation. This is done by a specified in the configuration VM selection algorithm (algorithm_vm_selection). Similarly to underload and overload detection algorithms, different VM selection algorithm can by plugged in according to the configuration. A VM selection algorithm accepts historical data on the resource usage by VMs running on the host and returns a set of VMs to migrate from the host.
The data collector is deployed on every compute host and is executed periodically to collect the CPU utilization data for each VM running on the host and stores the data in the local file-based data store. The data is stored as the average number of MHz consumed by a VM during the last measurement interval. The CPU usage data are stored as integers. This data format is portable: the stored values can be converted to the CPU utilization for any host or VM type, supporting heterogeneous hosts and VMs.
The actual data is obtained from Libvirt in the form of the CPU time consumed by a VM to date. Using the CPU time collected at the previous time frame, the CPU time for the past time interval is calculated. According to the CPU frequency of the host and the length of the time interval, the CPU time is converted into the required average MHz consumed by the VM over the last time interval. The collected data are stored both locally and submitted to the central database. The number of the latest data values stored locally and passed to the underload / overload detection and VM selection algorithms is defined using the data_collector_data_length option in the configuration file.
At the beginning of every execution, the data collector obtains the set of VMs currently running on the host using the Nova API and compares them to the VMs running on the host at the previous time step. If new VMs have been found, the data collector fetches the historical data about them from the central database and stores the data in the local file-based data store. If some VMs have been removed, the data collector removes the data about these VMs from the local data store.
As shown in Figure 1, the system contains two types of data stores:
The details about the data stores are given in the following subsections.
The central database is used for storing historical data on the resource usage by VMs running on all the compute hosts. The database is populated by data collectors deployed on the compute hosts. The data are consumed by VM placement algorithms. The database contains two tables: vms and vm_resource_usage.
The vms table is used for storing the mapping between UUIDs of VMs and the internal database IDs:
CREATE TABLE vms (
# the internal ID of a VM
id BIGINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
# the UUID of the VM
uuid CHAR(36) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
) ENGINE=MyISAM;The vm_resource_usage table is used for storing the data about the resource usage by VMs:
CREATE TABLE vm_resource_usage (
# the ID of the record
id BIGINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
# the id of the corresponding VM
vm_id BIGINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
# the time of the data collection
timestamp TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
# the average CPU usage in MHz
cpu_mhz MEDIUMINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
) ENGINE=MyISAM;The data collector stores the resource usage information locally in files in the <local_data_directory>/vm directory, where <local_data_directory> is defined in the configuration file using the local_data_directory option. The data for each VM are stored in a separate file named according to the UUID of the corresponding VM. The format of the files is a new line separated list of integers representing the average CPU consumption by the VMs in MHz during the last measurement interval.
The configuration of OpenStack Neat is stored in /etc/neat/neat.conf in the standard INI format using the # character for denoting comments. The configuration includes the following options:
sql_connection – the host name and credentials for connecting to the MySQL database specified in the format supported by SQLAlchemy;admin_tenant_name – the admin tenant name for authentication with Nova using Keystone;admin_user – the admin user name for authentication with Nova using Keystone;admin_password – the admin password for authentication with Nova using Keystone;global_manager_host – the name of the host running the global manager;global_manager_port – the port of the REST web service exposed by the global manager;local_data_directory – the directory used by the data collector to store the data on the resource usage by the VMs running on the host (the default value is /var/lib/neat);local_manager_interval – the time interval between subsequent invocations of the local manager in seconds;data_collector_interval – the time interval between subsequent invocations of the data collector in seconds;data_collector_data_length – the number of the latest data values stored locally by the data collector and passed to the underload / overload detection and VM placement algorithms;compute_user – the user name for connecting to the compute hosts to switch them into the sleep mode;compute_password – the password of the user account used for connecting to the compute hosts to switch them into the sleep mode;sleep_command – a shell command used to switch a host into the sleep mode, the compute_user must have permissions to execute this command (the default value is pm-suspend);algorithm_underload_detection – the fully qualified name of a Python function to use as an underload detection algorithm;algorithm_overload_detection – the fully qualified name of a Python function to use as an overload detection algorithm;algorithm_vm_selection – the fully qualified name of a Python function to use as a VM selection algorithm;algorithm_vm_placement – the fully qualified name of a Python function to use as a VM placement algorithm.This section describes a plan of how the components described above are going to be implemented.
The following third party libraries are planned to be used to implement the required components:
The global manager component will provide a REST web service implemented using the Bottle framework. The authentication is going to be done using the admin credentials specified in the configuration file. Upon receiving a request from a local manager, the following steps will be performed:
vm_uuids parameter and transform it into a list of UUIDs of the VMs to migrate.algorithm_vm_placement configuration option and pass the UUIDs of the VMs to migrate and the current VM placement as arguments.algorithm_vm_placement algorithm.When a host needs to be switched to the sleep mode, the global manager will use the account credentials from the compute_user and compute_password configuration options to open an SSH connection with the target host and then invoke the command specified in the sleep_command, which defaults to pm-suspend.
When a host needs to be re-activated from the sleep mode, the global manager will leverage the Wake-on-LAN technology and send a magic packet to the target host using the ether-wake program and passing the corresponding MAC address as an argument. The mapping between the IP addresses of the hosts and their MAC addresses is initialized in the beginning of the global manager’s execution.
The local manager will be implemented as a Linux daemon running in the background and every local_manager_interval seconds checking whether some VMs should be migrated from the host. Every time interval, the local manager performs the following steps:
<local_data_directory>/vm directory.algorithm_underload_detection configuration option and pass the data on the resource usage by the VMs, as well as the frequency of the CPU as arguments.vm_uuids parameter, as well as the reason for migration as being 0.algorithm_overload_detection configuration option and pass the data on the resource usage by the VMs, as well as the frequency of the host’s CPU as arguments.algorithm_vm_selection configuration option and pass the data on the resource usage by the VMs, as well as the frequency of the host’s CPU as argumentsvm_uuids parameter, as well as the reason for migration as being 1.local_manager_interval seconds.The data collector will be implemented as a Linux daemon running in the background and collecting data on the resource usage by VMs every data_collector_interval seconds. When the data collection phase is invoked, the component performs the following steps:
<local_data_directory>/vm directory to determine the list of VMs running on the host at the last data collection.<local_data_directory>/vm directory corresponding to the VMs that have been removed from the host.data_collector_data_length data values from the central database for each newly added VM using the database connection information specified in the sql_connection option and save the data in the <local_data_directory>/vm directory.<local_data_directory>/vm directory in separate files for each VM, and submit the data to the central database.data_collector_interval seconds.This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta.
This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved.
Use this section to take notes during the BoF; if you keep it in the approved spec, use it for summarising what was discussed and note any options that were rejected.
[1] A. Beloglazov and R. Buyya, “Optimal online deterministic algorithms and adaptive heuristics for energy and performance efficient dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in Cloud data centers,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE), vol. 24, pp. 1397–1420, 2012.
[2] A. Beloglazov and R. Buyya, “Managing Overloaded Hosts for Dynamic Consolidation of Virtual Machines in Cloud Data Centers Under Quality of Service Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS), 2012 (in press, accepted on August 2, 2012).
[3] J. Koomey, Growth in data center electricity use 2005 to 2010. Oakland, CA: Analytics Press, 2011.
[4] Gartner Inc., Gartner estimates ICT industry accounts for 2 percent of global CO2 emissions. Gartner Press Release (April 2007).
[5] R. Nathuji and K. Schwan, “VirtualPower: Coordinated power management in virtualized enterprise systems,” ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 41, pp. 265–278, 2007.
[6] A. Verma, P. Ahuja, and A. Neogi, “pMapper: Power and migration cost aware application placement in virtualized systems,” in Proc. of the 9th ACM/IFIP/USENIX Intl. Conf. on Middleware, 2008, pp. 243–264.
[7] X. Zhu, D. Young, B. J. Watson, Z. Wang, J. Rolia, S. Singhal, B. McKee, C. Hyser, and others, “1000 Islands: Integrated capacity and workload management for the next generation data center,” in Proc. of the 5th Intl. Conf. on Autonomic Computing (ICAC), 2008, pp. 172–181.
[8] D. Gmach, J. Rolia, L. Cherkasova, G. Belrose, T. Turicchi, and A. Kemper, “An integrated approach to resource pool management: Policies, efficiency and quality metrics,” in Proc. of the 38th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), 2008, pp. 326–335.
[9] D. Gmach, J. Rolia, L. Cherkasova, and A. Kemper, “Resource pool management: Reactive versus proactive or lets be friends,” Computer Networks, vol. 53, pp. 2905–2922, 2009.
[10] VMware Inc., “VMware Distributed Power Management Concepts and Use,” Information Guide, 2010.
[11] G. Jung, M. A. Hiltunen, K. R. Joshi, R. D. Schlichting, and C. Pu, “Mistral: Dynamically Managing Power, Performance, and Adaptation Cost in Cloud Infrastructures,” in Proc. of the 30th Intl. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), 2010, pp. 62–73.
[12] W. Zheng, R. Bianchini, G. J. Janakiraman, J. R. Santos, and Y. Turner, “JustRunIt: Experiment-based management of virtualized data centers,” in Proc. of the 2009 USENIX Annual Technical Conf., 2009, pp. 18–33.
[13] S. Kumar, V. Talwar, V. Kumar, P. Ranganathan, and K. Schwan, “vManage: Loosely coupled platform and virtualization management in data centers,” in Proc. of the 6th Intl. Conf. on Autonomic Computing (ICAC), 2009, pp. 127–136.
[14] B. Guenter, N. Jain, and C. Williams, “Managing Cost, Performance, and Reliability Tradeoffs for Energy-Aware Server Provisioning,” in Proc. of the 30st Annual IEEE Intl. Conf. on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), 2011, pp. 1332–1340.
[15] N. Bobroff, A. Kochut, and K. Beaty, “Dynamic placement of virtual machines for managing SLA violations,” in Proc. of the 10th IFIP/IEEE Intl. Symp. on Integrated Network Management (IM), 2007, pp. 119–128.
[16] A. Beloglazov, R. Buyya, Y. C. Lee, and A. Zomaya, “A Taxonomy and Survey of Energy-Efficient Data Centers and Cloud Computing Systems,” Advances in Computers, M. Zelkowitz (ed.), vol. 82, pp. 47–111, 2011.
[17] A. Beloglazov, S. F. Piraghaj, M. Alrokayan, and R. Buyya, “Deploying OpenStack on CentOS Using the KVM Hypervisor and GlusterFS Distributed File System,” Technical Report CLOUDS-TR-2012-3, Cloud Computing and Distributed Systems Laboratory, The University of Melbourne, Aug. 2012.