{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The base and counterfactual contexts preserve the same ordered rubric, publication rule, request scope, listing entity, evidence paths, and relevant times. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the packing-sheet assertion from exclusion to inclusion of the charger, which is coherent with the unchanged listing claim and creates no duplicate contradictory measurement or assertion. Neither audited context embeds a gold answer, answer code, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"timeline\":[\"At 15:50 UTC on 8 September 2026, an intake audit recorded that every required non-customer-facing catalog field was populated.\",\"At 16:00 UTC, the reviewer confirmed that the submitted listing contained no safety or regulatory claims.\",\"At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package did not include a USB-C wall charger.\",\"At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["timeline", "3"], "text": "At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger."}, {"path": ["timeline", "2"], "text": "At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package did not include a USB-C wall charger."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger.", "negative_left": "At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger.", "negative_right": "At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package included one USB-C wall charger.", "right": "At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package did not include a USB-C wall charger."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-007-001", "id": "scale-diverse-007-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.", "timeline": ["At 15:50 UTC on 8 September 2026, an intake audit recorded that every required non-customer-facing catalog field was populated.", "At 16:00 UTC, the reviewer confirmed that the submitted listing contained no safety or regulatory claims.", "At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package did not include a USB-C wall charger.", "At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The base and counterfactual contexts preserve the same ordered rubric, publication rule, request scope, listing entity, evidence paths, and relevant times. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the packing-sheet assertion from exclusion to inclusion of the charger, which is coherent with the unchanged listing claim and creates no duplicate contradictory measurement or assertion. Neither audited context embeds a gold answer, answer code, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"timeline\":[\"At 15:50 UTC on 8 September 2026, an intake audit recorded that every required non-customer-facing catalog field was populated.\",\"At 16:00 UTC, the reviewer confirmed that the submitted listing contained no safety or regulatory claims.\",\"At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package did not include a USB-C wall charger.\",\"At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["timeline", "3"], "text": "At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger."}, {"path": ["timeline", "2"], "text": "At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package did not include a USB-C wall charger."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger.", "negative_left": "At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger.", "negative_right": "At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package included one USB-C wall charger.", "right": "At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package did not include a USB-C wall charger."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-007-001", "id": "scale-diverse-007-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.", "timeline": ["At 15:50 UTC on 8 September 2026, an intake audit recorded that every required non-customer-facing catalog field was populated.", "At 16:00 UTC, the reviewer confirmed that the submitted listing contained no safety or regulatory claims.", "At 16:10 UTC on 8 September 2026, the complete seller documentation for that listing consisted solely of a signed packing sheet stating that the package included one USB-C wall charger.", "At 16:42 UTC on 8 September 2026, the only customer-facing package-contents claim anywhere in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing stated that the package included one USB-C wall charger."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing rubric and request, while the unchanged questions object preserves the full choice criteria and instructions. The same listing submission, evidence paths, timestamp, and requested decision dimensions are maintained across the pair. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes only the packing sheet’s mounting-plate declaration, removing the contents contradiction without conflicting with the unchanged field note or listing assertion. Neither context contains an answer code, explicit classification, label rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"field_note\":\"The listing contains no safety or regulatory claims. The catalog completeness check confirms that every required non-customer-facing field is populated.\",\"evidence\":[\"In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.\",\"For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and no magnetic mounting plate.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and no magnetic mounting plate."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.", "negative_left": "In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.", "negative_right": "For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.", "right": "For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and no magnetic mounting plate."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-007-004", "id": "scale-diverse-007-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.", "For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and no magnetic mounting plate."], "field_note": "The listing contains no safety or regulatory claims. The catalog completeness check confirms that every required non-customer-facing field is populated.", "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing rubric and request, while the unchanged questions object preserves the full choice criteria and instructions. The same listing submission, evidence paths, timestamp, and requested decision dimensions are maintained across the pair. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes only the packing sheet’s mounting-plate declaration, removing the contents contradiction without conflicting with the unchanged field note or listing assertion. Neither context contains an answer code, explicit classification, label rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"field_note\":\"The listing contains no safety or regulatory claims. The catalog completeness check confirms that every required non-customer-facing field is populated.\",\"evidence\":[\"In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.\",\"For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and no magnetic mounting plate.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and no magnetic mounting plate."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.", "negative_left": "In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.", "negative_right": "For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.", "right": "For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and no magnetic mounting plate."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-007-004", "id": "scale-diverse-007-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["In submission CDL-4005 at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing's entire customer-facing package-contents section consists solely of one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate.", "For submission CDL-4005, the seller documentation available at 2026-09-12T10:15:00Z consists solely of packing sheet PS-731, whose complete contents declaration specifies one lamp, one USB-C cable, and one magnetic mounting plate."], "field_note": "The listing contains no safety or regulatory claims. The catalog completeness check confirms that every required non-customer-facing field is populated.", "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing rubric and request, while the unchanged questions object preserves all decision instructions and criteria. The listing identity, evidence paths, and timestamps remain fixed; only the packing-sheet observation changes. Each context contains exactly two complete factual evidence sentences. The counterfactual packing-sheet contents are internally consistent with the listing claim and do not conflict with any unchanged fact. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, rule table, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field.\",\"At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, no USB-C cable, and no other item.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, no USB-C cable, and no other item."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field.", "negative_right": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item.", "right": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, no USB-C cable, and no other item."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-007-005", "id": "scale-diverse-007-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field.", "At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, no USB-C cable, and no other item."], "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing rubric and request, while the unchanged questions object preserves all decision instructions and criteria. The listing identity, evidence paths, and timestamps remain fixed; only the packing-sheet observation changes. Each context contains exactly two complete factual evidence sentences. The counterfactual packing-sheet contents are internally consistent with the listing claim and do not conflict with any unchanged fact. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, rule table, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field.\",\"At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, no USB-C cable, and no other item.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, no USB-C cable, and no other item."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field.", "negative_right": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item.", "right": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, no USB-C cable, and no other item."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-007-005", "id": "scale-diverse-007-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["At 09:10 UTC on 14 May 2026, the seller submitted cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581, whose complete set of customer-facing package-contents claims stated that the sealed package contained one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item; the submission also contained every required non-customer-facing catalog field.", "At 09:25 UTC on 14 May 2026, the reviewer verified that every safety and regulatory claim in cordless desk-lamp listing CDL-581 exactly matched its seller documentation, while the seller's complete packing sheet for that listing recorded one desk lamp, one USB-C cable, and no other item."], "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original ordered triage policy, request scope, and bindings to the current Northstar Soup Maker listing’s Capacity field. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences reporting the handoff and its listing-specific provenance. The counterfactual changes only the seller’s authorization status, coherently making the definition-matching value unapproved without conflicting with the unresolved definition, candidate values, or other observations. Neither context contains a gold decision, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Catalog intake reviewer\",\"text\":\"Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, and its current entry is conflicting.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Document examiner\",\"text\":\"The supplied manufacturer documentation supports two distinct candidate Capacity values: rated vessel volume of 1.7 L and recommended working fill of 1.5 L. The applicable category definition remains unresolved as to which measure governs Capacity.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Operational handoff recorder\",\"text\":\"At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Once the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is approved for entry.”\"},{\"speaker\":\"Audit custodian\",\"text\":\"Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Evidence controller\",\"text\":\"For every field other than Capacity in this listing, the supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Compliance reviewer\",\"text\":\"The supplied documentation does not directly disprove any safety or regulatory claim for this listing; all reviewed safety and regulatory claims are consistent with it.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Once the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is approved for entry.”"}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Once the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is approved for entry.”", "negative_left": "At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Even after the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is not approved for entry.”", "negative_right": "Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values.", "right": "Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-008-003", "id": "scale-diverse-008-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Catalog intake reviewer", "text": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, and its current entry is conflicting."}, {"speaker": "Document examiner", "text": "The supplied manufacturer documentation supports two distinct candidate Capacity values: rated vessel volume of 1.7 L and recommended working fill of 1.5 L. The applicable category definition remains unresolved as to which measure governs Capacity."}, {"speaker": "Operational handoff recorder", "text": "At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Once the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is approved for entry.”"}, {"speaker": "Audit custodian", "text": "Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values."}, {"speaker": "Evidence controller", "text": "For every field other than Capacity in this listing, the supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}, {"speaker": "Compliance reviewer", "text": "The supplied documentation does not directly disprove any safety or regulatory claim for this listing; all reviewed safety and regulatory claims are consistent with it."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_specialist_review_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original ordered triage policy, request scope, and bindings to the current Northstar Soup Maker listing’s Capacity field. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences reporting the handoff and its listing-specific provenance. The counterfactual changes only the seller’s authorization status, coherently making the definition-matching value unapproved without conflicting with the unresolved definition, candidate values, or other observations. Neither context contains a gold decision, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Catalog intake reviewer\",\"text\":\"Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, and its current entry is conflicting.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Document examiner\",\"text\":\"The supplied manufacturer documentation supports two distinct candidate Capacity values: rated vessel volume of 1.7 L and recommended working fill of 1.5 L. The applicable category definition remains unresolved as to which measure governs Capacity.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Operational handoff recorder\",\"text\":\"At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Once the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is approved for entry.”\"},{\"speaker\":\"Audit custodian\",\"text\":\"Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Evidence controller\",\"text\":\"For every field other than Capacity in this listing, the supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Compliance reviewer\",\"text\":\"The supplied documentation does not directly disprove any safety or regulatory claim for this listing; all reviewed safety and regulatory claims are consistent with it.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Once the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is approved for entry.”"}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Once the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is approved for entry.”", "negative_left": "At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Even after the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is not approved for entry.”", "negative_right": "Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values.", "right": "Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-008-003", "id": "scale-diverse-008-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Catalog intake reviewer", "text": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, and its current entry is conflicting."}, {"speaker": "Document examiner", "text": "The supplied manufacturer documentation supports two distinct candidate Capacity values: rated vessel volume of 1.7 L and recommended working fill of 1.5 L. The applicable category definition remains unresolved as to which measure governs Capacity."}, {"speaker": "Operational handoff recorder", "text": "At 14:20 UTC on 8 September 2026, Mara Vale signed operational handoff H-731 stating, “Even after the applicable category definition identifies which candidate Capacity value fits, that value is not approved for entry.”"}, {"speaker": "Audit custodian", "text": "Audit record N-408 identifies Mara Vale as the seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing and states that operational handoff H-731 applies exclusively to that listing’s candidate Capacity values."}, {"speaker": "Evidence controller", "text": "For every field other than Capacity in this listing, the supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}, {"speaker": "Compliance reviewer", "text": "The supplied documentation does not directly disprove any safety or regulatory claim for this listing; all reviewed safety and regulatory claims are consistent with it."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full governing rubric, and neither context alters or omits any additional governing policy from the original state. Both contexts retain the same listing, Capacity field, seller, and relevant timestamps; the two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the seller’s conditional authorization to withholding authorization, which is coherent with the unresolved category definition and dual documentary support. Neither context contains an answer choice, output instruction, rule table, proposition ID, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Intake record\",\"text\":\"At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog intake\",\"text\":\"Capacity is a required core field for the current listing.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Document review\",\"text\":\"The manufacturer sheet supports two distinct Capacity candidates—rated vessel volume at 1.7 L and recommended working fill at 1.5 L—so the current Capacity field is conflicting.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Category review\",\"text\":\"The supplied category materials leave unresolved whether Capacity means rated vessel volume or recommended working fill.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Compliance review\",\"text\":\"A comparison of the listing with the supplied documentation found that the documentation does not disprove any safety or regulatory claim.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Declaration archive\",\"text\":\"At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration authorizing whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition if that definition resolves the choice.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Final evidence check\",\"text\":\"For every field other than Capacity, the supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller."}, {"path": ["5", "text"], "text": "At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration authorizing whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition if that definition resolves the choice."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller.", "negative_left": "At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller.", "negative_right": "At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration withholding authorization from whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition even if that definition resolves the choice.", "right": "At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration authorizing whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition if that definition resolves the choice."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-008-005", "id": "scale-diverse-008-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Intake record", "text": "At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller."}, {"speaker": "Catalog intake", "text": "Capacity is a required core field for the current listing."}, {"speaker": "Document review", "text": "The manufacturer sheet supports two distinct Capacity candidates—rated vessel volume at 1.7 L and recommended working fill at 1.5 L—so the current Capacity field is conflicting."}, {"speaker": "Category review", "text": "The supplied category materials leave unresolved whether Capacity means rated vessel volume or recommended working fill."}, {"speaker": "Compliance review", "text": "A comparison of the listing with the supplied documentation found that the documentation does not disprove any safety or regulatory claim."}, {"speaker": "Declaration archive", "text": "At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration authorizing whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition if that definition resolves the choice."}, {"speaker": "Final evidence check", "text": "For every field other than Capacity, the supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_specialist_review_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full governing rubric, and neither context alters or omits any additional governing policy from the original state. Both contexts retain the same listing, Capacity field, seller, and relevant timestamps; the two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the seller’s conditional authorization to withholding authorization, which is coherent with the unresolved category definition and dual documentary support. Neither context contains an answer choice, output instruction, rule table, proposition ID, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Intake record\",\"text\":\"At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog intake\",\"text\":\"Capacity is a required core field for the current listing.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Document review\",\"text\":\"The manufacturer sheet supports two distinct Capacity candidates—rated vessel volume at 1.7 L and recommended working fill at 1.5 L—so the current Capacity field is conflicting.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Category review\",\"text\":\"The supplied category materials leave unresolved whether Capacity means rated vessel volume or recommended working fill.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Compliance review\",\"text\":\"A comparison of the listing with the supplied documentation found that the documentation does not disprove any safety or regulatory claim.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Declaration archive\",\"text\":\"At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration authorizing whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition if that definition resolves the choice.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Final evidence check\",\"text\":\"For every field other than Capacity, the supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller."}, {"path": ["5", "text"], "text": "At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration authorizing whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition if that definition resolves the choice."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller.", "negative_left": "At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller.", "negative_right": "At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration withholding authorization from whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition even if that definition resolves the choice.", "right": "At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration authorizing whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition if that definition resolves the choice."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-008-005", "id": "scale-diverse-008-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Intake record", "text": "At 09:14 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing as its seller."}, {"speaker": "Catalog intake", "text": "Capacity is a required core field for the current listing."}, {"speaker": "Document review", "text": "The manufacturer sheet supports two distinct Capacity candidates—rated vessel volume at 1.7 L and recommended working fill at 1.5 L—so the current Capacity field is conflicting."}, {"speaker": "Category review", "text": "The supplied category materials leave unresolved whether Capacity means rated vessel volume or recommended working fill."}, {"speaker": "Compliance review", "text": "A comparison of the listing with the supplied documentation found that the documentation does not disprove any safety or regulatory claim."}, {"speaker": "Declaration archive", "text": "At 11:42 UTC on 16 September 2026, Elena Voss signed a declaration withholding authorization from whichever candidate Capacity value matches the applicable category definition even if that definition resolves the choice."}, {"speaker": "Final evidence check", "text": "For every field other than Capacity, the supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy, publication-readiness scope, insulated-bottle entity, latest-attachment evidence path, and Wednesday review timing. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the latest attachment’s final dimension from 25.8 to 24.8 centimeters, creating a coherent inconsistency with the unchanged listing rather than a contradictory duplicate assertion. Neither context includes a gold answer, output instruction, answer code, proposition ID, rule table, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"The seller uploaded a replacement attachment on Tuesday, and the catalog reviewer confirmed that it was the latest seller documentation available when conducting Wednesday’s review. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters. As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters.", "negative_left": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters.", "negative_right": "As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 24.8 centimeters.", "right": "As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-009-001", "id": "scale-diverse-009-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "The seller uploaded a replacement attachment on Tuesday, and the catalog reviewer confirmed that it was the latest seller documentation available when conducting Wednesday’s review. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters. As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy, publication-readiness scope, insulated-bottle entity, latest-attachment evidence path, and Wednesday review timing. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the latest attachment’s final dimension from 25.8 to 24.8 centimeters, creating a coherent inconsistency with the unchanged listing rather than a contradictory duplicate assertion. Neither context includes a gold answer, output instruction, answer code, proposition ID, rule table, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"The seller uploaded a replacement attachment on Tuesday, and the catalog reviewer confirmed that it was the latest seller documentation available when conducting Wednesday’s review. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters. As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters.", "negative_left": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters.", "negative_right": "As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 24.8 centimeters.", "right": "As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-009-001", "id": "scale-diverse-009-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "The seller uploaded a replacement attachment on Tuesday, and the catalog reviewer confirmed that it was the latest seller documentation available when conducting Wednesday’s review. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing displayed a capacity of 710 milliliters, a material of 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions of 7.4 × 7.4 × 25.8 centimeters. As of Wednesday, 16 September 2026, at 14:00 UTC, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer displayed the insulated bottle's capacity as 710 milliliters, material as 18/8 stainless steel, and dimensions as 7.4 × 7.4 × 24.8 centimeters. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original supersession, publication, severity, and routing policies without adding exceptions or defaults. They preserve the insulated-bottle listing, latest-attachment comparison, Wednesday review timing, required fields, and publication-readiness scope. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the latest attachment’s dimension measurement, creating a coherent mismatch with the unchanged listing rather than a contradictory duplicate assertion. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, rule table, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"Catalog operations prepared the insulated-bottle record for its scheduled Wednesday review after the seller completed a documentation update. The marketplace listing and the seller’s latest attachment available to the reviewer both identify the capacity as 740 milliliters and the material as 18/8 stainless steel. No identity, prohibited-item, or typographical issue was observed during the handoff. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters.", "negative_left": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters.", "negative_right": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 29.1 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters.", "right": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-009-003", "id": "scale-diverse-009-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Catalog operations prepared the insulated-bottle record for its scheduled Wednesday review after the seller completed a documentation update. The marketplace listing and the seller’s latest attachment available to the reviewer both identify the capacity as 740 milliliters and the material as 18/8 stainless steel. No identity, prohibited-item, or typographical issue was observed during the handoff. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original supersession, publication, severity, and routing policies without adding exceptions or defaults. They preserve the insulated-bottle listing, latest-attachment comparison, Wednesday review timing, required fields, and publication-readiness scope. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the latest attachment’s dimension measurement, creating a coherent mismatch with the unchanged listing rather than a contradictory duplicate assertion. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, rule table, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"Catalog operations prepared the insulated-bottle record for its scheduled Wednesday review after the seller completed a documentation update. The marketplace listing and the seller’s latest attachment available to the reviewer both identify the capacity as 740 milliliters and the material as 18/8 stainless steel. No identity, prohibited-item, or typographical issue was observed during the handoff. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters.", "negative_left": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters.", "negative_right": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 29.1 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters.", "right": "At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-009-003", "id": "scale-diverse-009-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Catalog operations prepared the insulated-bottle record for its scheduled Wednesday review after the seller completed a documentation update. The marketplace listing and the seller’s latest attachment available to the reviewer both identify the capacity as 740 milliliters and the material as 18/8 stainless steel. No identity, prohibited-item, or typographical issue was observed during the handoff. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing showed dimensions of 27.4 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters. At the catalog review on Wednesday, 16 September 2026, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer was file IB-74-revC, which showed the insulated bottle's dimensions as 29.1 by 7.6 by 7.6 centimeters. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original voltage-conflict policy, defect ranking, specialist-routing requirement, and publication consequence without adding exceptions or defaults. The request remains bound to the Voltara VT-K7 listing and the same specialist-routing/publication-blocking decision. Each context contains two complete factual evidence sentences. The counterfactual changes only M-84’s voltage range so that it matches Q-31; this is coherent with the statement that the evidence contains no reconciliation of any voltage difference, because that statement does not assert that a difference exists. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; A3 is a permissible universal claim over the explicit set of other applicable requirements. A1 is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only A1 changing. The policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating rules concerning unresolved voltage conflicts, unsupported seller statements, specialist routing, and publication blocking; the unchanged questions object automatically preserves the decision instructions and outcome criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails conflicting voltage specifications among seller documents, while refuted A2 entails that the supplied evidence does not establish reconciliation. This is an unresolved voltage conflict, which the policy expressly makes a publication-blocking Blocker requiring specialist routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuted A1 excludes disagreement among the supplied seller documents about voltage, and supported A3 establishes satisfaction of every other applicable listing requirement. Together they exclude both the specified voltage-conflict trigger and any other unmet requirement, so the negative outcome is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Among all seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, at least two specify different voltage ranges for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At least one item of supplied evidence establishes a reconciliation of a voltage difference among the seller documents for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "Every marketplace listing requirement applicable to the Voltara VT-K7 listing other than agreement among seller documents about voltage is satisfied."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A catalog reviewer examined the supplied materials in chronological order before deciding whether the fictional listing could proceed. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied.\",\"At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 210–250 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7.\"],\"request\":\"Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 210–250 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Blockers prevent publication."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}], "rules": [{"justification": "A voltage difference exists among the supplied seller documents, and the supplied evidence does not establish a reconciliation. The conflict is therefore unresolved; the policy classifies it as a Blocker requiring category-specialist routing and preventing publication.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "No two supplied seller documents disagree about voltage, and every other applicable listing requirement is satisfied. Thus there is neither an unresolved seller-document voltage conflict nor another unmet requirement requiring specialist review or blocking publication.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied.", "negative_left": "At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied.", "negative_right": "At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7.", "right": "At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 210–250 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-010-001", "id": "scale-diverse-010-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not require specialist review; treat the listing as ready or eligible for ordinary correction.", "true": "Yes — route the listing to a category specialist and block publication pending resolution."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated triage policy to the supplied evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "A catalog reviewer examined the supplied materials in chronological order before deciding whether the fictional listing could proceed. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.", "evidence": ["At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied.", "At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 210–250 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7."], "request": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-010", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "05d88156f46298a27351272f508360cbdc7108bb28cfd12a25195bd9e3311442", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original voltage-conflict policy, defect ranking, specialist-routing requirement, and publication consequence without adding exceptions or defaults. The request remains bound to the Voltara VT-K7 listing and the same specialist-routing/publication-blocking decision. Each context contains two complete factual evidence sentences. The counterfactual changes only M-84’s voltage range so that it matches Q-31; this is coherent with the statement that the evidence contains no reconciliation of any voltage difference, because that statement does not assert that a difference exists. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; A3 is a permissible universal claim over the explicit set of other applicable requirements. A1 is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only A1 changing. The policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating rules concerning unresolved voltage conflicts, unsupported seller statements, specialist routing, and publication blocking; the unchanged questions object automatically preserves the decision instructions and outcome criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails conflicting voltage specifications among seller documents, while refuted A2 entails that the supplied evidence does not establish reconciliation. This is an unresolved voltage conflict, which the policy expressly makes a publication-blocking Blocker requiring specialist routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuted A1 excludes disagreement among the supplied seller documents about voltage, and supported A3 establishes satisfaction of every other applicable listing requirement. Together they exclude both the specified voltage-conflict trigger and any other unmet requirement, so the negative outcome is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Among all seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, at least two specify different voltage ranges for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At least one item of supplied evidence establishes a reconciliation of a voltage difference among the seller documents for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "Every marketplace listing requirement applicable to the Voltara VT-K7 listing other than agreement among seller documents about voltage is satisfied."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A catalog reviewer examined the supplied materials in chronological order before deciding whether the fictional listing could proceed. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied.\",\"At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 210–250 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7.\"],\"request\":\"Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 210–250 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Blockers prevent publication."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}], "rules": [{"justification": "A voltage difference exists among the supplied seller documents, and the supplied evidence does not establish a reconciliation. The conflict is therefore unresolved; the policy classifies it as a Blocker requiring category-specialist routing and preventing publication.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "No two supplied seller documents disagree about voltage, and every other applicable listing requirement is satisfied. Thus there is neither an unresolved seller-document voltage conflict nor another unmet requirement requiring specialist review or blocking publication.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied.", "negative_left": "At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied.", "negative_right": "At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7.", "right": "At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 210–250 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-010-001", "id": "scale-diverse-010-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not require specialist review; treat the listing as ready or eligible for ordinary correction.", "true": "Yes — route the listing to a category specialist and block publication pending resolution."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated triage policy to the supplied evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "A catalog reviewer examined the supplied materials in chronological order before deciding whether the fictional listing could proceed. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.", "evidence": ["At 09:05 UTC on 16 September 2026, the first of exactly two seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document Q-31, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7; the supplied evidence contained no reconciliation of any voltage difference, and every other applicable marketplace listing requirement was satisfied.", "At 09:12 UTC on 16 September 2026, the second and final seller document supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, document M-84, specified 108–132 volts as its sole voltage range for model VT-K7."], "request": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-010", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "05d88156f46298a27351272f508360cbdc7108bb28cfd12a25195bd9e3311442", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing triage policy and preserve the same Voltara VT-K7 specialist-routing request. Each evidence set consists of two complete factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes IS-82’s voltage to match SB-47 without contradicting the unchanged record, and neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; A3 is a permissible universal claim over the explicit set of other applicable requirements. A1 is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only A1 changing. The policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating rules concerning unresolved voltage conflicts, unsupported seller statements, specialist routing, and publication blocking; the unchanged questions object automatically preserves the decision instructions and outcome criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails conflicting voltage specifications among seller documents, while refuted A2 entails that the supplied evidence does not establish reconciliation. This is an unresolved voltage conflict, which the policy expressly makes a publication-blocking Blocker requiring specialist routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuted A1 excludes disagreement among the supplied seller documents about voltage, and supported A3 establishes satisfaction of every other applicable listing requirement. Together they exclude both the specified voltage-conflict trigger and any other unmet requirement, so the negative outcome is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Among all seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, at least two specify different voltage ranges for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At least one item of supplied evidence establishes a reconciliation of a voltage difference among the seller documents for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "Every marketplace listing requirement applicable to the Voltara VT-K7 listing other than agreement among seller documents about voltage is satisfied."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Field note for the catalog reviewer handling the fictional Voltara travel-kettle submission. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied.\",\"Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 V for model VT-K7.\"],\"request\":\"Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 V for model VT-K7."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Blockers prevent publication."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}], "rules": [{"justification": "A voltage difference exists among the supplied seller documents, and the supplied evidence does not establish a reconciliation. The conflict is therefore unresolved; the policy classifies it as a Blocker requiring category-specialist routing and preventing publication.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "No two supplied seller documents disagree about voltage, and every other applicable listing requirement is satisfied. Thus there is neither an unresolved seller-document voltage conflict nor another unmet requirement requiring specialist review or blocking publication.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied.", "negative_left": "At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied.", "negative_right": "Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 100–120 V for model VT-K7.", "right": "Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 V for model VT-K7."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-010-004", "id": "scale-diverse-010-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not require specialist review; treat the listing as ready or eligible for ordinary correction.", "true": "Yes — route the listing to a category specialist and block publication pending resolution."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated triage policy to the supplied evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Field note for the catalog reviewer handling the fictional Voltara travel-kettle submission. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.", "evidence": ["At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied.", "Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 V for model VT-K7."], "request": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-010", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "05d88156f46298a27351272f508360cbdc7108bb28cfd12a25195bd9e3311442", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing triage policy and preserve the same Voltara VT-K7 specialist-routing request. Each evidence set consists of two complete factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes IS-82’s voltage to match SB-47 without contradicting the unchanged record, and neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; A3 is a permissible universal claim over the explicit set of other applicable requirements. A1 is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only A1 changing. The policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating rules concerning unresolved voltage conflicts, unsupported seller statements, specialist routing, and publication blocking; the unchanged questions object automatically preserves the decision instructions and outcome criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails conflicting voltage specifications among seller documents, while refuted A2 entails that the supplied evidence does not establish reconciliation. This is an unresolved voltage conflict, which the policy expressly makes a publication-blocking Blocker requiring specialist routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuted A1 excludes disagreement among the supplied seller documents about voltage, and supported A3 establishes satisfaction of every other applicable listing requirement. Together they exclude both the specified voltage-conflict trigger and any other unmet requirement, so the negative outcome is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Among all seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, at least two specify different voltage ranges for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At least one item of supplied evidence establishes a reconciliation of a voltage difference among the seller documents for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "Every marketplace listing requirement applicable to the Voltara VT-K7 listing other than agreement among seller documents about voltage is satisfied."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Field note for the catalog reviewer handling the fictional Voltara travel-kettle submission. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied.\",\"Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 V for model VT-K7.\"],\"request\":\"Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 V for model VT-K7."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Blockers prevent publication."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}], "rules": [{"justification": "A voltage difference exists among the supplied seller documents, and the supplied evidence does not establish a reconciliation. The conflict is therefore unresolved; the policy classifies it as a Blocker requiring category-specialist routing and preventing publication.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "No two supplied seller documents disagree about voltage, and every other applicable listing requirement is satisfied. Thus there is neither an unresolved seller-document voltage conflict nor another unmet requirement requiring specialist review or blocking publication.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied.", "negative_left": "At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied.", "negative_right": "Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 100–120 V for model VT-K7.", "right": "Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 V for model VT-K7."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-010-004", "id": "scale-diverse-010-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not require specialist review; treat the listing as ready or eligible for ordinary correction.", "true": "Yes — route the listing to a category specialist and block publication pending resolution."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated triage policy to the supplied evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Field note for the catalog reviewer handling the fictional Voltara travel-kettle submission. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.", "evidence": ["At 10:15 UTC on 16 September 2026, the complete review record for the Voltara VT-K7 listing identified brochure SB-47 and installation sheet IS-82 as the only supplied seller documents, recorded SB-47's VT-K7 voltage range as 100–120 V, contained no reconciliation evidence concerning their voltage specifications, and marked every other applicable marketplace listing requirement as satisfied.", "Installation sheet IS-82 specifies a voltage range of 100–120 V for model VT-K7."], "request": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-010", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "05d88156f46298a27351272f508360cbdc7108bb28cfd12a25195bd9e3311442", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full scoring rubric and instructions, while both contexts retain the relevant category-specific policy that care instructions are optional and identify model code as required. The request remains about the same decision type for listing L at the stated review time. The focus evidence consists of exactly two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes the listing’s model code from ZX-418 to ZX-419 while the supplied documents remain ZX-418; the statement that the files agree in every non-model-code respect expressly accommodates that discrepancy. Neither context contains a score, publication verdict, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "refuted", "a16": "refuted", "a17": "refuted", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "refuted", "a16": "refuted", "a17": "refuted", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "refuted", "a16": "refuted", "a17": "refuted", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; quantified completeness and consistency atoms remain atomic rather than bundling unrelated conclusions. The focus atom concerns whether documented model-code values match the listing, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that match relation changing: the remaining documentation-consistency atom expressly excludes model-code values. Policy evidence correctly preserves the needed state-originated Drinkware rule that care instructions are optional; decision criteria and priority instructions remain automatically available from the unchanged questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish a blank optional merchandising field, while all required identity, offer, category, and specification information is populated and supported. Documentation is consistent, and all specialist-level grounds are excluded. Therefore level 1 is the highest applicable severity.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With at least one documented model code and the universal match proposition refuted, at least one documented code conflicts with the entered code. Because model code is stipulated to be required identity information, this makes required non-safety information unsupported. Specialist-level grounds are excluded, so level 2 is the highest applicable severity.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Listing L is categorized in the Drinkware category."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The care-instructions field in listing L is blank."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The model-code field in listing L is a required product-identity field."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Every required product-identity field in listing L other than the model-code field is populated."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Every required product-identity field in listing L other than the model-code field is supported by the supplied documentation."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every required offer field in listing L is populated."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Every required offer field in listing L is supported by the supplied documentation."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every required category field in listing L is populated."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Every required category field in listing L is supported by the supplied documentation."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Every required product-specification field in listing L is populated."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Every required product-specification field in listing L is supported by the supplied documentation."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Every supplied document is consistent with listing L in every respect other than its model-code value."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "At least one supplied document displays a model-code value for listing L."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "Every model-code value displayed in the supplied documentation for listing L equals the model-code value entered in listing L."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "Missing information for listing L concerns safety."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "Missing information for listing L concerns regulatory compliance."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "Listing L has an unresolved restricted-product status."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The category identity of listing L is unresolved."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Documentation custodian\",\"text\":\"At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog auditor\",\"text\":\"At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-418.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Category reviewer\",\"text\":\"Listing L is assigned to Drinkware, and its category identity is resolved. In the Drinkware category, care instructions are an optional merchandising field; that field is blank in L.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Completeness reviewer\",\"text\":\"Model code is a required product-identity field. Every other required identity field, every required offer field, every required category field, and every required product-specification field is populated and supported by Q7 and V4. Both files are consistent with L in every non-model-code respect.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Compliance reviewer\",\"text\":\"The only omitted information is care instructions. No safety or regulatory-compliance information is missing, and the restricted-product review is closed with no unresolved status.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Marketplace support agent\",\"text\":\"Please determine the listing’s completeness severity and whether it may be published under the stated rubric.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-418."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "In the Drinkware category, care instructions are an optional merchandising field;"}], "rules": [{"justification": "The blank care-instructions field is optional in Drinkware, every required field is populated and supported, and every supplied document is consistent with the listing, including every documented model-code value. No specialist-level issue applies.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "At least one supplied document displays a model code that differs from the entered model code. Because the model-code field is required product-identity information, the conflict leaves required non-safety identity information unsupported; no specialist-level issue applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively.", "negative_left": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively.", "negative_right": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-419.", "right": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-418."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-011-004", "id": "scale-diverse-011-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Complete: No required or optional listing information is missing, and all supplied documentation is consistent with the listing. Publication ready: yes.", "1 — Minor incomplete: One or more optional merchandising fields are missing, but all required identity, offer, category, and product-specification fields are present and consistent. Route for routine correction without blocking publication. Publication ready: yes.", "2 — Major incomplete: At least one required non-safety field is missing or unsupported, such as package quantity, material, dimensions, price, or product identity. Route to the seller for correction before publication. Publication ready: no.", "3 — Specialist-required incomplete: Missing information concerns safety, regulatory compliance, restricted-product status, or unresolved category identity and cannot be resolved from seller documentation. Route to a category specialist. Publication ready: no."], "instructions": "Choose the single highest applicable completeness-severity level. Treat unsupported information as missing rather than inferring it. Apply the publication-readiness judgment included in each level.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Documentation custodian", "text": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively."}, {"speaker": "Catalog auditor", "text": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-418."}, {"speaker": "Category reviewer", "text": "Listing L is assigned to Drinkware, and its category identity is resolved. In the Drinkware category, care instructions are an optional merchandising field; that field is blank in L."}, {"speaker": "Completeness reviewer", "text": "Model code is a required product-identity field. Every other required identity field, every required offer field, every required category field, and every required product-specification field is populated and supported by Q7 and V4. Both files are consistent with L in every non-model-code respect."}, {"speaker": "Compliance reviewer", "text": "The only omitted information is care instructions. No safety or regulatory-compliance information is missing, and the restricted-product review is closed with no unresolved status."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace support agent", "text": "Please determine the listing’s completeness severity and whether it may be published under the stated rubric."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-011", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "593296c7b8c1094f2976ed61fd7d36100d4a71383f7e7a4073c1c6c09b20cf6e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full scoring rubric and instructions, while both contexts retain the relevant category-specific policy that care instructions are optional and identify model code as required. The request remains about the same decision type for listing L at the stated review time. The focus evidence consists of exactly two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes the listing’s model code from ZX-418 to ZX-419 while the supplied documents remain ZX-418; the statement that the files agree in every non-model-code respect expressly accommodates that discrepancy. Neither context contains a score, publication verdict, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "refuted", "a16": "refuted", "a17": "refuted", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "refuted", "a16": "refuted", "a17": "refuted", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "refuted", "a16": "refuted", "a17": "refuted", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; quantified completeness and consistency atoms remain atomic rather than bundling unrelated conclusions. The focus atom concerns whether documented model-code values match the listing, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that match relation changing: the remaining documentation-consistency atom expressly excludes model-code values. Policy evidence correctly preserves the needed state-originated Drinkware rule that care instructions are optional; decision criteria and priority instructions remain automatically available from the unchanged questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish a blank optional merchandising field, while all required identity, offer, category, and specification information is populated and supported. Documentation is consistent, and all specialist-level grounds are excluded. Therefore level 1 is the highest applicable severity.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With at least one documented model code and the universal match proposition refuted, at least one documented code conflicts with the entered code. Because model code is stipulated to be required identity information, this makes required non-safety information unsupported. Specialist-level grounds are excluded, so level 2 is the highest applicable severity.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Listing L is categorized in the Drinkware category."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The care-instructions field in listing L is blank."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The model-code field in listing L is a required product-identity field."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Every required product-identity field in listing L other than the model-code field is populated."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Every required product-identity field in listing L other than the model-code field is supported by the supplied documentation."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every required offer field in listing L is populated."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Every required offer field in listing L is supported by the supplied documentation."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every required category field in listing L is populated."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Every required category field in listing L is supported by the supplied documentation."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Every required product-specification field in listing L is populated."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Every required product-specification field in listing L is supported by the supplied documentation."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Every supplied document is consistent with listing L in every respect other than its model-code value."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "At least one supplied document displays a model-code value for listing L."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "Every model-code value displayed in the supplied documentation for listing L equals the model-code value entered in listing L."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "Missing information for listing L concerns safety."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "Missing information for listing L concerns regulatory compliance."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "Listing L has an unresolved restricted-product status."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The category identity of listing L is unresolved."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Documentation custodian\",\"text\":\"At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog auditor\",\"text\":\"At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-418.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Category reviewer\",\"text\":\"Listing L is assigned to Drinkware, and its category identity is resolved. In the Drinkware category, care instructions are an optional merchandising field; that field is blank in L.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Completeness reviewer\",\"text\":\"Model code is a required product-identity field. Every other required identity field, every required offer field, every required category field, and every required product-specification field is populated and supported by Q7 and V4. Both files are consistent with L in every non-model-code respect.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Compliance reviewer\",\"text\":\"The only omitted information is care instructions. No safety or regulatory-compliance information is missing, and the restricted-product review is closed with no unresolved status.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Marketplace support agent\",\"text\":\"Please determine the listing’s completeness severity and whether it may be published under the stated rubric.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-418."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "In the Drinkware category, care instructions are an optional merchandising field;"}], "rules": [{"justification": "The blank care-instructions field is optional in Drinkware, every required field is populated and supported, and every supplied document is consistent with the listing, including every documented model-code value. No specialist-level issue applies.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "At least one supplied document displays a model code that differs from the entered model code. Because the model-code field is required product-identity information, the conflict leaves required non-safety identity information unsupported; no specialist-level issue applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively.", "negative_left": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively.", "negative_right": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-419.", "right": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-418."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-011-004", "id": "scale-diverse-011-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Complete: No required or optional listing information is missing, and all supplied documentation is consistent with the listing. Publication ready: yes.", "1 — Minor incomplete: One or more optional merchandising fields are missing, but all required identity, offer, category, and product-specification fields are present and consistent. Route for routine correction without blocking publication. Publication ready: yes.", "2 — Major incomplete: At least one required non-safety field is missing or unsupported, such as package quantity, material, dimensions, price, or product identity. Route to the seller for correction before publication. Publication ready: no.", "3 — Specialist-required incomplete: Missing information concerns safety, regulatory compliance, restricted-product status, or unresolved category identity and cannot be resolved from seller documentation. Route to a category specialist. Publication ready: no."], "instructions": "Choose the single highest applicable completeness-severity level. Treat unsupported information as missing rather than inferring it. Apply the publication-readiness judgment included in each level.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Documentation custodian", "text": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the complete supplied documentation for listing L consisted of files Q7 and V4, whose only displayed model-code values were ZX-418 and ZX-418, respectively."}, {"speaker": "Catalog auditor", "text": "At the 2026-09-17 review, the model-code value entered in listing L was ZX-419."}, {"speaker": "Category reviewer", "text": "Listing L is assigned to Drinkware, and its category identity is resolved. In the Drinkware category, care instructions are an optional merchandising field; that field is blank in L."}, {"speaker": "Completeness reviewer", "text": "Model code is a required product-identity field. Every other required identity field, every required offer field, every required category field, and every required product-specification field is populated and supported by Q7 and V4. Both files are consistent with L in every non-model-code respect."}, {"speaker": "Compliance reviewer", "text": "The only omitted information is care instructions. No safety or regulatory-compliance information is missing, and the restricted-product review is closed with no unresolved status."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace support agent", "text": "Please determine the listing’s completeness severity and whether it may be published under the stated rubric."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-011", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "593296c7b8c1094f2976ed61fd7d36100d4a71383f7e7a4073c1c6c09b20cf6e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both constructed contexts retain the original lesson requirements, latest-report rule, readiness rubric, routing policy, request scope, and 09:00/item bindings. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only R-C’s timestamp, making R-D the latest camera report; its remaining routine setup is consistent with the task audit, which excludes only unrelated or non-routine setup. Neither constructed context embeds a gold outcome, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"The latest timestamped checks available before 09:00 record 24 desks, a successful startup test for the required projector, and an unobstructed exit.\",\"The report register identifies R-D and R-C as the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00. Both concern the document camera required for the lesson.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026.\",\"R-D records that the required camera is present and passed its operational test, but that routine setup remains.\",\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41:09 on 17 September 2026.\",\"R-C records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and has its routine setup complete.\",\"The pre-lesson task audit finds no remaining equipment repair, room or safety work, setup unrelated to the required camera, or non-routine setup for that camera.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41:09 on 17 September 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 07:53:46 on 17 September 2026.", "right": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41:09 on 17 September 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-079-001", "id": "scale-diverse-079-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["The latest timestamped checks available before 09:00 record 24 desks, a successful startup test for the required projector, and an unobstructed exit.", "The report register identifies R-D and R-C as the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00. Both concern the document camera required for the lesson.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026.", "R-D records that the required camera is present and passed its operational test, but that routine setup remains.", "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41:09 on 17 September 2026.", "R-C records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and has its routine setup complete.", "The pre-lesson task audit finds no remaining equipment repair, room or safety work, setup unrelated to the required camera, or non-routine setup for that camera."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both constructed contexts retain the original lesson requirements, latest-report rule, readiness rubric, routing policy, request scope, and 09:00/item bindings. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only R-C’s timestamp, making R-D the latest camera report; its remaining routine setup is consistent with the task audit, which excludes only unrelated or non-routine setup. Neither constructed context embeds a gold outcome, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"The latest timestamped checks available before 09:00 record 24 desks, a successful startup test for the required projector, and an unobstructed exit.\",\"The report register identifies R-D and R-C as the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00. Both concern the document camera required for the lesson.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026.\",\"R-D records that the required camera is present and passed its operational test, but that routine setup remains.\",\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41:09 on 17 September 2026.\",\"R-C records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and has its routine setup complete.\",\"The pre-lesson task audit finds no remaining equipment repair, room or safety work, setup unrelated to the required camera, or non-routine setup for that camera.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41:09 on 17 September 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 07:53:46 on 17 September 2026.", "right": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41:09 on 17 September 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-079-001", "id": "scale-diverse-079-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["The latest timestamped checks available before 09:00 record 24 desks, a successful startup test for the required projector, and an unobstructed exit.", "The report register identifies R-D and R-C as the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00. Both concern the document camera required for the lesson.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:14:22 on 17 September 2026.", "R-D records that the required camera is present and passed its operational test, but that routine setup remains.", "Report R-C bears the timestamp 07:53:46 on 17 September 2026.", "R-C records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and has its routine setup complete.", "The pre-lesson task audit finds no remaining equipment repair, room or safety work, setup unrelated to the required camera, or non-routine setup for that camera."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The governing policy, request, question criteria, lesson entity, required items, routing rules, and 09:00 time binding are unchanged. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. Changing R-C from 08:47 to 08:16 makes R-D at 08:31 the latest camera report, and its remaining routine setup is consistent with the closeout statement, which excludes other or non-routine tasks but does not deny routine camera setup. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, or extraneous output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"questions\":{\"decision\":{\"criteria\":{\"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities\":\"Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.\",\"Hold — Unverified; request updated reports\":\"Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.\",\"Proceed — High; no remaining routing\":\"Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.\",\"Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant\":\"Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains.\"},\"instructions\":\"Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.\",\"type\":\"choice\"}},\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:47 UTC.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC.\",\"The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 is R-C and R-D, and both concern the document camera required for the lesson.\",\"R-C records the required camera as present, operationally tested and passed, with routine setup complete.\",\"R-D records the required camera as present, operationally tested and passed, with routine setup still remaining.\",\"The latest pre-09:00 reports separately record that the required projector passed its startup test, the room has 24 desks, and the exit is unobstructed.\",\"The pre-lesson closeout records no remaining equipment repair or room or safety task, no setup task unrelated to the required camera, and no non-routine camera setup task.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:47 UTC."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:47 UTC.", "negative_left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:16 UTC.", "negative_right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC.", "right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-079-002", "id": "scale-diverse-079-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:47 UTC.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC.", "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 is R-C and R-D, and both concern the document camera required for the lesson.", "R-C records the required camera as present, operationally tested and passed, with routine setup complete.", "R-D records the required camera as present, operationally tested and passed, with routine setup still remaining.", "The latest pre-09:00 reports separately record that the required projector passed its startup test, the room has 24 desks, and the exit is unobstructed.", "The pre-lesson closeout records no remaining equipment repair or room or safety task, no setup task unrelated to the required camera, and no non-routine camera setup task."], "questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The governing policy, request, question criteria, lesson entity, required items, routing rules, and 09:00 time binding are unchanged. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. Changing R-C from 08:47 to 08:16 makes R-D at 08:31 the latest camera report, and its remaining routine setup is consistent with the closeout statement, which excludes other or non-routine tasks but does not deny routine camera setup. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, or extraneous output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"questions\":{\"decision\":{\"criteria\":{\"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities\":\"Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.\",\"Hold — Unverified; request updated reports\":\"Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.\",\"Proceed — High; no remaining routing\":\"Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.\",\"Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant\":\"Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains.\"},\"instructions\":\"Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.\",\"type\":\"choice\"}},\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:47 UTC.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC.\",\"The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 is R-C and R-D, and both concern the document camera required for the lesson.\",\"R-C records the required camera as present, operationally tested and passed, with routine setup complete.\",\"R-D records the required camera as present, operationally tested and passed, with routine setup still remaining.\",\"The latest pre-09:00 reports separately record that the required projector passed its startup test, the room has 24 desks, and the exit is unobstructed.\",\"The pre-lesson closeout records no remaining equipment repair or room or safety task, no setup task unrelated to the required camera, and no non-routine camera setup task.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:47 UTC."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:47 UTC.", "negative_left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:16 UTC.", "negative_right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC.", "right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-079-002", "id": "scale-diverse-079-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["Report R-C bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:16 UTC.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 2026-04-14 08:31 UTC.", "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 is R-C and R-D, and both concern the document camera required for the lesson.", "R-C records the required camera as present, operationally tested and passed, with routine setup complete.", "R-D records the required camera as present, operationally tested and passed, with routine setup still remaining.", "The latest pre-09:00 reports separately record that the required projector passed its startup test, the room has 24 desks, and the exit is unobstructed.", "The pre-lesson closeout records no remaining equipment repair or room or safety task, no setup task unrelated to the required camera, and no non-routine camera setup task."], "questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same 09:00 microscopy-lesson requirements, latest-report rule, readiness rubric, routing policy, and request scope. The two focus spans are complete factual timestamp sentences. Moving R-D from 08:39:05 to 08:52:31 coherently makes it the latest camera report; its routine-setup status is allowed by the unchanged evidence, and the differing time-indexed reports are not irreconcilable duplicate measurements. Neither context states a selected outcome, answer code, proposition identifier, or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"R-C and R-D are the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, and both concern the document camera required for the lesson.\",\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:39:05 UTC on 18 September 2026.\",\"R-C records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and has its routine setup complete.\",\"R-D records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and still requires routine setup.\",\"The latest timestamped reports available before 09:00 record that the required projector passed its startup test, that 24 desks are available, and that the exit is unobstructed.\",\"Before 09:00, no equipment repair task, room or safety task, setup task unrelated to the required document camera, or non-routine setup task for that camera remains for the lesson.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:39:05 UTC on 18 September 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:52:31 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:39:05 UTC on 18 September 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-079-003", "id": "scale-diverse-079-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["R-C and R-D are the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, and both concern the document camera required for the lesson.", "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:39:05 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "R-C records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and has its routine setup complete.", "R-D records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and still requires routine setup.", "The latest timestamped reports available before 09:00 record that the required projector passed its startup test, that 24 desks are available, and that the exit is unobstructed.", "Before 09:00, no equipment repair task, room or safety task, setup task unrelated to the required document camera, or non-routine setup task for that camera remains for the lesson."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same 09:00 microscopy-lesson requirements, latest-report rule, readiness rubric, routing policy, and request scope. The two focus spans are complete factual timestamp sentences. Moving R-D from 08:39:05 to 08:52:31 coherently makes it the latest camera report; its routine-setup status is allowed by the unchanged evidence, and the differing time-indexed reports are not irreconcilable duplicate measurements. Neither context states a selected outcome, answer code, proposition identifier, or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"R-C and R-D are the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, and both concern the document camera required for the lesson.\",\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:39:05 UTC on 18 September 2026.\",\"R-C records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and has its routine setup complete.\",\"R-D records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and still requires routine setup.\",\"The latest timestamped reports available before 09:00 record that the required projector passed its startup test, that 24 desks are available, and that the exit is unobstructed.\",\"Before 09:00, no equipment repair task, room or safety task, setup task unrelated to the required document camera, or non-routine setup task for that camera remains for the lesson.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:39:05 UTC on 18 September 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:52:31 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:39:05 UTC on 18 September 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-079-003", "id": "scale-diverse-079-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["R-C and R-D are the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, and both concern the document camera required for the lesson.", "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:47:12 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:52:31 UTC on 18 September 2026.", "R-C records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and has its routine setup complete.", "R-D records that the required camera is present, passed its operational test, and still requires routine setup.", "The latest timestamped reports available before 09:00 record that the required projector passed its startup test, that 24 desks are available, and that the exit is unobstructed.", "Before 09:00, no equipment repair task, room or safety task, setup task unrelated to the required document camera, or non-routine setup task for that camera remains for the lesson."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The counterfactual changes only Q-73’s delivery-completion time from 09:47 to 10:03 while preserving the 10:00 session, B214, L-1, equipment requirements, release condition, and all governing readiness criteria. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences, the pre-session count of 23 is compatible with a later delivery, and neither context includes an answer code, gold label, rule table, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a9": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a9": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a9": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a9": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a9": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a9": "supported"}, "right": {"a9": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a factual requirement, status, timing, availability, release condition, or room-use condition rather than a final classification. The focus atom a9 is a factual temporal relation. The base and counter differ only on whether the loaner's delivery completion precedes the start time, and both are realizable: delivery may be scheduled before start or at/after start while all other facts remain unchanged. The policy evidence correctly cites only original-state material and preserves the state-originating lesson-equipment scope and no-sharing requirement needed to interpret the unchanged question; the governing classification rubrics already remain in original_input.questions and need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes a requirement for 24 tablets, exactly 23 currently eligible tablets, working display and HDMI, a tagged and verified sole replacement delivered before start, release held through Instructional Technology delivery and confirmation, and exclusions for both safety conditions and formal closure. This is sufficient for Conditional rather than High, Medium, Low, or Closed.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a9 entails that the sole available candidate replacement is not delivered before the session. With 24 tablets required, exactly 23 currently eligible, and no other candidate replacement, there is no verified pre-start remedy. Safety and formal-closure exclusions prevent the competing Closed outcome, so Low is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The 10:00 digital-mapping session in room B214 requires 24 individually assigned student tablets."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The 10:00 digital-mapping session in room B214 requires an instructor display."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The 10:00 digital-mapping session in room B214 requires HDMI input."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "At the current pre-session setup check, exactly 23 tablets in room B214 are verified serviceable and eligible to satisfy the individually assigned tablet requirement."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor display in room B214 is currently verified serviceable for the 10:00 digital-mapping session."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The HDMI input in room B214 is currently verified serviceable for the 10:00 digital-mapping session."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Tagged loaner tablet L-1 is the only candidate replacement available for the 10:00 digital-mapping session in room B214."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Tagged loaner tablet L-1 is currently verified serviceable."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The recorded delivery-completion time for tagged loaner tablet L-1 in room B214 is before the recorded 10:00 start time of the digital-mapping session."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Release of the 10:00 digital-mapping session is held until Instructional Technology delivers tagged loaner tablet L-1 to room B214."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Release of the 10:00 digital-mapping session is held until Instructional Technology confirms tagged loaner tablet L-1 after delivery."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "No safety condition prevents use of room B214 for the 10:00 digital-mapping session."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "No formal room closure prevents use of room B214 for the 10:00 digital-mapping session."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Classroom instructor\",\"text\":\"The 10:00 digital-mapping lesson requires 24 individually assigned tablets, the instructor display, and HDMI input. The plan permits no tablet sharing because each of the 24 enrolled students must submit an individual map.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Handoff recorder\",\"text\":\"Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Handoff recorder\",\"text\":\"Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 09:47 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Instructional Technology\",\"text\":\"L-1 is the only candidate replacement available for this session and is currently verified serviceable. Release remains held until our team delivers L-1 to B214 and confirms it after delivery.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Setup checker\",\"text\":\"At the current pre-session check, exactly 23 tablets in B214 are serviceable and eligible for individual assignment. The instructor display and its HDMI input are both currently verified serviceable for the session.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Facilities coordinator\",\"text\":\"No safety condition or formal room closure prevents use of B214 for the 10:00 session.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a9", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 09:47 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "The 10:00 digital-mapping lesson requires 24 individually assigned tablets, the instructor display, and HDMI input. The plan permits no tablet sharing because each of the 24 enrolled students must submit an individual map."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Exactly one of the 24 required individually assigned tablets is unavailable, while the other critical equipment is verified. The only candidate replacement is tagged, verified serviceable, and recorded to arrive before the 10:00 start. Release remains held until Instructional Technology delivers and confirms it, and neither a safety condition nor a formal closure supplies the competing Closed outcome.", "target": "D — Conditional; hold release; dispatch Instructional Technology", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Exactly one required tablet is unavailable, and L-1 is the only candidate replacement. Because its recorded delivery-completion time is explicitly not before the 10:00 start, no verified replacement can arrive before the session. Neither a safety condition nor a formal closure supplies the competing Closed outcome.", "target": "C — Low; do not proceed; escalate unresolved equipment shortage", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1.", "negative_left": "Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1.", "negative_right": "Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 10:03 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day.", "right": "Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 09:47 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-080-003", "id": "scale-diverse-080-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"A — High; proceed now; no dispatch": "Use only when all critical lesson equipment is already verified serviceable and no setup or repair task is needed.", "B — Medium; proceed; route to Facilities": "Use when every critical requirement is met, only a noncritical room, furniture, or power issue remains, and Facilities owns the task.", "C — Low; do not proceed; escalate unresolved equipment shortage": "Use when critical equipment is short by more than one unit or no verified replacement can arrive before the session.", "D — Conditional; hold release; dispatch Instructional Technology": "Use when exactly one critical unit is unavailable, a verified replacement can arrive before start, and the session proceeds only after the technology team delivers and confirms it.", "E — Closed; cancel room use; route to Facilities": "Use only when a safety condition or formal room closure prevents use regardless of equipment availability."}, "instructions": "Determine operational readiness, whether the planned session may be released to proceed, and the correct task route. Evidence policy: current equipment status and setup checks override inventory totals, and untagged equipment cannot satisfy a requirement. Apply these rubrics exactly: High means every critical requirement is currently verified; Medium means all critical requirements are verified but a noncritical issue remains; Conditional means exactly one critical unit is missing, a verified replacement is available before start, and release is held until delivery; Low means a critical shortage has no verified pre-start remedy or exceeds one unit; Closed means a safety or room closure bars use regardless of equipment.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Classroom instructor", "text": "The 10:00 digital-mapping lesson requires 24 individually assigned tablets, the instructor display, and HDMI input. The plan permits no tablet sharing because each of the 24 enrolled students must submit an individual map."}, {"speaker": "Handoff recorder", "text": "Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1."}, {"speaker": "Handoff recorder", "text": "Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 09:47 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day."}, {"speaker": "Instructional Technology", "text": "L-1 is the only candidate replacement available for this session and is currently verified serviceable. Release remains held until our team delivers L-1 to B214 and confirms it after delivery."}, {"speaker": "Setup checker", "text": "At the current pre-session check, exactly 23 tablets in B214 are serviceable and eligible for individual assignment. The instructor display and its HDMI input are both currently verified serviceable for the session."}, {"speaker": "Facilities coordinator", "text": "No safety condition or formal room closure prevents use of B214 for the 10:00 session."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-080", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "145227bb8d4b688d08bc6336278544fd5ab81d9c2b8cf6681c387c5320849007", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "D — Conditional; hold release; dispatch Instructional Technology"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The counterfactual changes only Q-73’s delivery-completion time from 09:47 to 10:03 while preserving the 10:00 session, B214, L-1, equipment requirements, release condition, and all governing readiness criteria. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences, the pre-session count of 23 is compatible with a later delivery, and neither context includes an answer code, gold label, rule table, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a9": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a9": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a9": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a9": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a9": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a9": "supported"}, "right": {"a9": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a factual requirement, status, timing, availability, release condition, or room-use condition rather than a final classification. The focus atom a9 is a factual temporal relation. The base and counter differ only on whether the loaner's delivery completion precedes the start time, and both are realizable: delivery may be scheduled before start or at/after start while all other facts remain unchanged. The policy evidence correctly cites only original-state material and preserves the state-originating lesson-equipment scope and no-sharing requirement needed to interpret the unchanged question; the governing classification rubrics already remain in original_input.questions and need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes a requirement for 24 tablets, exactly 23 currently eligible tablets, working display and HDMI, a tagged and verified sole replacement delivered before start, release held through Instructional Technology delivery and confirmation, and exclusions for both safety conditions and formal closure. This is sufficient for Conditional rather than High, Medium, Low, or Closed.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a9 entails that the sole available candidate replacement is not delivered before the session. With 24 tablets required, exactly 23 currently eligible, and no other candidate replacement, there is no verified pre-start remedy. Safety and formal-closure exclusions prevent the competing Closed outcome, so Low is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The 10:00 digital-mapping session in room B214 requires 24 individually assigned student tablets."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The 10:00 digital-mapping session in room B214 requires an instructor display."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The 10:00 digital-mapping session in room B214 requires HDMI input."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "At the current pre-session setup check, exactly 23 tablets in room B214 are verified serviceable and eligible to satisfy the individually assigned tablet requirement."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor display in room B214 is currently verified serviceable for the 10:00 digital-mapping session."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The HDMI input in room B214 is currently verified serviceable for the 10:00 digital-mapping session."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Tagged loaner tablet L-1 is the only candidate replacement available for the 10:00 digital-mapping session in room B214."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Tagged loaner tablet L-1 is currently verified serviceable."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The recorded delivery-completion time for tagged loaner tablet L-1 in room B214 is before the recorded 10:00 start time of the digital-mapping session."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Release of the 10:00 digital-mapping session is held until Instructional Technology delivers tagged loaner tablet L-1 to room B214."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Release of the 10:00 digital-mapping session is held until Instructional Technology confirms tagged loaner tablet L-1 after delivery."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "No safety condition prevents use of room B214 for the 10:00 digital-mapping session."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "No formal room closure prevents use of room B214 for the 10:00 digital-mapping session."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Classroom instructor\",\"text\":\"The 10:00 digital-mapping lesson requires 24 individually assigned tablets, the instructor display, and HDMI input. The plan permits no tablet sharing because each of the 24 enrolled students must submit an individual map.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Handoff recorder\",\"text\":\"Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Handoff recorder\",\"text\":\"Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 09:47 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Instructional Technology\",\"text\":\"L-1 is the only candidate replacement available for this session and is currently verified serviceable. Release remains held until our team delivers L-1 to B214 and confirms it after delivery.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Setup checker\",\"text\":\"At the current pre-session check, exactly 23 tablets in B214 are serviceable and eligible for individual assignment. The instructor display and its HDMI input are both currently verified serviceable for the session.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Facilities coordinator\",\"text\":\"No safety condition or formal room closure prevents use of B214 for the 10:00 session.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a9", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 09:47 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "The 10:00 digital-mapping lesson requires 24 individually assigned tablets, the instructor display, and HDMI input. The plan permits no tablet sharing because each of the 24 enrolled students must submit an individual map."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Exactly one of the 24 required individually assigned tablets is unavailable, while the other critical equipment is verified. The only candidate replacement is tagged, verified serviceable, and recorded to arrive before the 10:00 start. Release remains held until Instructional Technology delivers and confirms it, and neither a safety condition nor a formal closure supplies the competing Closed outcome.", "target": "D — Conditional; hold release; dispatch Instructional Technology", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Exactly one required tablet is unavailable, and L-1 is the only candidate replacement. Because its recorded delivery-completion time is explicitly not before the 10:00 start, no verified replacement can arrive before the session. Neither a safety condition nor a formal closure supplies the competing Closed outcome.", "target": "C — Low; do not proceed; escalate unresolved equipment shortage", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1.", "negative_left": "Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1.", "negative_right": "Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 10:03 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day.", "right": "Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 09:47 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-080-003", "id": "scale-diverse-080-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"A — High; proceed now; no dispatch": "Use only when all critical lesson equipment is already verified serviceable and no setup or repair task is needed.", "B — Medium; proceed; route to Facilities": "Use when every critical requirement is met, only a noncritical room, furniture, or power issue remains, and Facilities owns the task.", "C — Low; do not proceed; escalate unresolved equipment shortage": "Use when critical equipment is short by more than one unit or no verified replacement can arrive before the session.", "D — Conditional; hold release; dispatch Instructional Technology": "Use when exactly one critical unit is unavailable, a verified replacement can arrive before start, and the session proceeds only after the technology team delivers and confirms it.", "E — Closed; cancel room use; route to Facilities": "Use only when a safety condition or formal room closure prevents use regardless of equipment availability."}, "instructions": "Determine operational readiness, whether the planned session may be released to proceed, and the correct task route. Evidence policy: current equipment status and setup checks override inventory totals, and untagged equipment cannot satisfy a requirement. Apply these rubrics exactly: High means every critical requirement is currently verified; Medium means all critical requirements are verified but a noncritical issue remains; Conditional means exactly one critical unit is missing, a verified replacement is available before start, and release is held until delivery; Low means a critical shortage has no verified pre-start remedy or exceeds one unit; Closed means a safety or room closure bars use regardless of equipment.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Classroom instructor", "text": "The 10:00 digital-mapping lesson requires 24 individually assigned tablets, the instructor display, and HDMI input. The plan permits no tablet sharing because each of the 24 enrolled students must submit an individual map."}, {"speaker": "Handoff recorder", "text": "Room B214's operational handoff log identifies event Q-73 as the recorded delivery completion of tagged loaner tablet L-1."}, {"speaker": "Handoff recorder", "text": "Room B214's operational handoff log timestamps event Q-73 at 10:03 and the digital-mapping session's start at 10:00 on the same day."}, {"speaker": "Instructional Technology", "text": "L-1 is the only candidate replacement available for this session and is currently verified serviceable. Release remains held until our team delivers L-1 to B214 and confirms it after delivery."}, {"speaker": "Setup checker", "text": "At the current pre-session check, exactly 23 tablets in B214 are serviceable and eligible for individual assignment. The instructor display and its HDMI input are both currently verified serviceable for the session."}, {"speaker": "Facilities coordinator", "text": "No safety condition or formal room closure prevents use of B214 for the 10:00 session."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-080", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "145227bb8d4b688d08bc6336278544fd5ab81d9c2b8cf6681c387c5320849007", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "C — Low; do not proceed; escalate unresolved equipment shortage"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full governing readiness and routing policy, while both contexts retain the same Mara/session/Room C12/date-time and required-equipment bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes only DC-47’s documentation status and does not conflict with any unchanged assertion. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12. The plan, prepared for 24 students, also required 12 powered microscopes and video conferencing; those were its only requirements. At 9:10 a.m., the session inventory listed exactly 12 powered microscopes, DC-47 as its single document camera, and video-conferencing system VC-3. At 9:15 a.m., the testing log individually identified all 12 required powered microscopes and recorded each as having passed testing that morning. At 9:18 a.m., the technology report recorded VC-3 as operational. At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained a signed record stating that DC-47 had passed an operational test that morning.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained a signed record stating that DC-47 had passed an operational test that morning."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12.", "negative_left": "At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12.", "negative_right": "At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained no record identifying DC-47 as operational or tested.", "right": "At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained a signed record stating that DC-47 had passed an operational test that morning."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-081-005", "id": "scale-diverse-081-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12. The plan, prepared for 24 students, also required 12 powered microscopes and video conferencing; those were its only requirements. At 9:10 a.m., the session inventory listed exactly 12 powered microscopes, DC-47 as its single document camera, and video-conferencing system VC-3. At 9:15 a.m., the testing log individually identified all 12 required powered microscopes and recorded each as having passed testing that morning. At 9:18 a.m., the technology report recorded VC-3 as operational. At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained a signed record stating that DC-47 had passed an operational test that morning."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full governing readiness and routing policy, while both contexts retain the same Mara/session/Room C12/date-time and required-equipment bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes only DC-47’s documentation status and does not conflict with any unchanged assertion. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12. The plan, prepared for 24 students, also required 12 powered microscopes and video conferencing; those were its only requirements. At 9:10 a.m., the session inventory listed exactly 12 powered microscopes, DC-47 as its single document camera, and video-conferencing system VC-3. At 9:15 a.m., the testing log individually identified all 12 required powered microscopes and recorded each as having passed testing that morning. At 9:18 a.m., the technology report recorded VC-3 as operational. At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained a signed record stating that DC-47 had passed an operational test that morning.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained a signed record stating that DC-47 had passed an operational test that morning."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12.", "negative_left": "At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12.", "negative_right": "At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained no record identifying DC-47 as operational or tested.", "right": "At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained a signed record stating that DC-47 had passed an operational test that morning."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-081-005", "id": "scale-diverse-081-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At 9:05 a.m. on October 14, 2026, Mara’s signed lesson plan designated asset DC-47 as the one document camera required for her 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12. The plan, prepared for 24 students, also required 12 powered microscopes and video conferencing; those were its only requirements. At 9:10 a.m., the session inventory listed exactly 12 powered microscopes, DC-47 as its single document camera, and video-conferencing system VC-3. At 9:15 a.m., the testing log individually identified all 12 required powered microscopes and recorded each as having passed testing that morning. At 9:18 a.m., the technology report recorded VC-3 as operational. At 9:20 a.m. on October 14, 2026, the complete set of equipment documentation for asset DC-47 contained no record identifying DC-47 as operational or tested."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original scope, substitution, routing, readiness, and proceedability policies, while the unchanged questions object preserves the decision criteria and instructions. The request and lesson, room, personnel-routing, and readiness bindings remain unchanged. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes the approved-spare register so that CP-684 is absent; this does not contradict CP-684 being selected or being the only physically available spare, since approval and availability are distinct. Neither context embeds an answer, answer code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a7": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a7": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a7": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a7": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a7": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a7": "supported"}, "right": {"a7": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship, and the focus atom concerns the factual approval status of the selected spare rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that status and are both realizable: policy permits an approved spare as a valid replacement but does not make installation of an unapproved spare physically impossible. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating requirement, scope, substitution, routing, and readiness rules needed to interpret the unchanged question; inventory details can be supplied through synthetic factual observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish that the only documented in-scope requirements are met: four tables are arranged, and the failed required projector is replaced by an installed, working, approved spare. The optional document camera is excluded for the non-assessed lesson. This yields medium readiness, and both projector tasks are routed to Instructional Technology as required.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The selected working spare is explicitly unapproved and is the only available spare, while the required ceiling projector has failed. It therefore cannot serve as the approved replacement required for medium readiness, leaving an in-scope projector requirement unmet and making the requested conjunctive decision false, regardless of the otherwise correct routing.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara's planned collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar is non-assessed."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has a room-dependent requirement for one projector."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has a room-dependent requirement for four movable group tables."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "A document camera is optional for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The ceiling projector designated for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has failed."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar is working."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar is listed as an approved spare."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The selected spare projector is installed in Room Cedar for Mara's planned lesson."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Four movable group tables are arranged in Room Cedar for Mara's planned lesson."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The selected spare projector is the only spare projector available for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "The proposed setup plan routes spare-projector installation for Mara's planned lesson to Instructional Technology."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The proposed setup plan routes repair of the failed ceiling projector for Mara's planned lesson to Instructional Technology."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Field note for Mara’s planned non-assessed collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar, following the room inspection and setup review.\",\"evidence\":[\"The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional.\",\"At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684.\",\"At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-684 and CP-917.\",\"The designated ceiling projector had failed. The selected unit was working, installed in Room Cedar for the lesson, and was the only spare projector available. Four movable group tables were arranged in the room.\",\"Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment.\",\"The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant.\",\"The proposed setup plan sends both installation of the selected spare and repair of the failed ceiling projector to Instructional Technology.\",\"Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed.\"],\"request\":\"Should the lesson proceed at medium readiness, with projector installation and repair routed to Instructional Technology?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a7", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-684 and CP-917."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The optional document camera is out of scope because the lesson is non-assessed. The four required tables are arranged, and the failed required projector is replaced by the installed, working, approved spare, so every in-scope requirement is met using an approved substitute and readiness is medium. Both proposed projector-task routes match the checklist.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The optional document camera remains out of scope and the table requirement is met, but the failed required projector has no approved replacement because the only available spare is explicitly not approved. A required in-scope item therefore remains unmet, producing low rather than medium readiness, even though both projector-task routes match the checklist.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684.", "negative_left": "At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684.", "negative_right": "At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-531 and CP-917.", "right": "At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-684 and CP-917."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-082-004", "id": "scale-diverse-082-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the session cannot proceed at medium readiness or the proposed projector routing is incorrect.", "true": "Yes — the session may proceed at medium readiness, and the projector tasks should be routed to Instructional Technology."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated scope, exception, routing, and readiness rules to the documented lesson requirements.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Field note for Mara’s planned non-assessed collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar, following the room inspection and setup review.", "evidence": ["The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional.", "At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684.", "At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-684 and CP-917.", "The designated ceiling projector had failed. The selected unit was working, installed in Room Cedar for the lesson, and was the only spare projector available. Four movable group tables were arranged in the room.", "Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment.", "The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant.", "The proposed setup plan sends both installation of the selected spare and repair of the failed ceiling projector to Instructional Technology.", "Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed."], "request": "Should the lesson proceed at medium readiness, with projector installation and repair routed to Instructional Technology?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-082", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "24df64f969ed79e3b01d4b398ff4af3c6698fb6761e9c9c6c6eb55135a86e60d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original scope, substitution, routing, readiness, and proceedability policies, while the unchanged questions object preserves the decision criteria and instructions. The request and lesson, room, personnel-routing, and readiness bindings remain unchanged. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes the approved-spare register so that CP-684 is absent; this does not contradict CP-684 being selected or being the only physically available spare, since approval and availability are distinct. Neither context embeds an answer, answer code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a7": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a7": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a7": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a7": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a7": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a7": "supported"}, "right": {"a7": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship, and the focus atom concerns the factual approval status of the selected spare rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that status and are both realizable: policy permits an approved spare as a valid replacement but does not make installation of an unapproved spare physically impossible. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating requirement, scope, substitution, routing, and readiness rules needed to interpret the unchanged question; inventory details can be supplied through synthetic factual observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish that the only documented in-scope requirements are met: four tables are arranged, and the failed required projector is replaced by an installed, working, approved spare. The optional document camera is excluded for the non-assessed lesson. This yields medium readiness, and both projector tasks are routed to Instructional Technology as required.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The selected working spare is explicitly unapproved and is the only available spare, while the required ceiling projector has failed. It therefore cannot serve as the approved replacement required for medium readiness, leaving an in-scope projector requirement unmet and making the requested conjunctive decision false, regardless of the otherwise correct routing.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara's planned collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar is non-assessed."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has a room-dependent requirement for one projector."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has a room-dependent requirement for four movable group tables."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "A document camera is optional for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The ceiling projector designated for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has failed."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar is working."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar is listed as an approved spare."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The selected spare projector is installed in Room Cedar for Mara's planned lesson."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Four movable group tables are arranged in Room Cedar for Mara's planned lesson."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The selected spare projector is the only spare projector available for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "The proposed setup plan routes spare-projector installation for Mara's planned lesson to Instructional Technology."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The proposed setup plan routes repair of the failed ceiling projector for Mara's planned lesson to Instructional Technology."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Field note for Mara’s planned non-assessed collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar, following the room inspection and setup review.\",\"evidence\":[\"The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional.\",\"At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684.\",\"At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-684 and CP-917.\",\"The designated ceiling projector had failed. The selected unit was working, installed in Room Cedar for the lesson, and was the only spare projector available. Four movable group tables were arranged in the room.\",\"Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment.\",\"The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant.\",\"The proposed setup plan sends both installation of the selected spare and repair of the failed ceiling projector to Instructional Technology.\",\"Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed.\"],\"request\":\"Should the lesson proceed at medium readiness, with projector installation and repair routed to Instructional Technology?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a7", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-684 and CP-917."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The optional document camera is out of scope because the lesson is non-assessed. The four required tables are arranged, and the failed required projector is replaced by the installed, working, approved spare, so every in-scope requirement is met using an approved substitute and readiness is medium. Both proposed projector-task routes match the checklist.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The optional document camera remains out of scope and the table requirement is met, but the failed required projector has no approved replacement because the only available spare is explicitly not approved. A required in-scope item therefore remains unmet, producing low rather than medium readiness, even though both projector-task routes match the checklist.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684.", "negative_left": "At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684.", "negative_right": "At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-531 and CP-917.", "right": "At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-684 and CP-917."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-082-004", "id": "scale-diverse-082-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the session cannot proceed at medium readiness or the proposed projector routing is incorrect.", "true": "Yes — the session may proceed at medium readiness, and the projector tasks should be routed to Instructional Technology."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated scope, exception, routing, and readiness rules to the documented lesson requirements.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Field note for Mara’s planned non-assessed collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar, following the room inspection and setup review.", "evidence": ["The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional.", "At 07:40 on 22 October 2026, the spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar bore asset tag CP-684.", "At 07:45 on 22 October 2026, the complete approved-spare register for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar contained exactly asset tags CP-531 and CP-917.", "The designated ceiling projector had failed. The selected unit was working, installed in Room Cedar for the lesson, and was the only spare projector available. Four movable group tables were arranged in the room.", "Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment.", "The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant.", "The proposed setup plan sends both installation of the selected spare and repair of the failed ceiling projector to Instructional Technology.", "Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed."], "request": "Should the lesson proceed at medium readiness, with projector installation and repair routed to Instructional Technology?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-082", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "24df64f969ed79e3b01d4b398ff4af3c6698fb6761e9c9c6c6eb55135a86e60d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing readiness criteria and routing rules, while both contexts retain the same lesson, room, date, required resources, fallback authorization, and preparation facts. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only slot F-6 from active to inactive; prepared print sets can coherently exist even when their fallback slot is inactive, and no unchanged assertion says the slot is active. Neither context contains a score, gold answer, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a3": "supported"}, "right": {"a3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; universally quantified atoms such as readiness of all other required resources or routing of all tasks remain atomic. The focus atom concerns the factual applicability of a particular fallback, not a policy classification. The base and counter assignments differ only on that focus and are realizable: the authorization can exist while either applying or not applying as the fallback, and the absence of any other fallback is consistent in both cases. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing readiness criteria, routing rules, and fallback policy are already preserved in the unchanged questions object; no additional substantive policy originates in the state.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes an unavailable required document camera, an applicable and prepared documented fallback, readiness of every other required resource, absence of an unresolved room-safety issue, and proper routing of all setup or repair tasks. Because a required resource remains unavailable, levels 2 and 3 are excluded, while the prepared fallback satisfies level 1.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction establishes that a required resource is unavailable, the identified print-set authorization does not apply as its documented fallback, and no other documented fallback exists. Therefore the unavailable required resource lacks a documented fallback, which is sufficient for level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The document camera is a required resource for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The document camera is unavailable for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The lesson plan’s authorization of 24 labeled print sets applies as a documented fallback for the unavailable document camera in tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "All 24 labeled print sets authorized by the lesson plan are prepared for use in tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "No documented fallback other than the lesson plan’s authorization of 24 labeled print sets exists for the document camera in tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every required resource other than the document camera is available for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Every required resource other than the document camera is operational for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every required resource other than the document camera is safely set up for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "An unresolved room-safety problem exists in B214 for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Every repair or setup task for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214 is routed to the responsible team specified by the readiness instructions."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Instructor\",\"text\":\"Field note for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214: the document camera and ceiling projector are the only required resources.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Records clerk\",\"text\":\"The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Readiness clerk\",\"text\":\"The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as active.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Teaching assistant\",\"text\":\"All 24 authorized print sets are complete, labeled, and prepared at the student tables for tomorrow’s use.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Readiness coordinator\",\"text\":\"No other documented fallback is recorded. The ceiling projector is available, operational, securely mounted, and safely set up. Inspection confirms clear exits, sound furniture, working outlets, and no unresolved room-safety problem. Every repair or setup task has been routed according to the readiness instructions: the camera repair to Instructional Technology and packet placement to the teaching assistant; no Facilities task remains.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as active."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The unavailable document camera is required, its sole documented fallback applies and is prepared, every other required resource is available, operational, and safely set up, no unresolved room-safety problem exists, and every repair or setup task is routed to the responsible team.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required document camera is unavailable, the plan’s 24-set authorization does not apply as its documented fallback, and no other documented fallback exists; therefore, an unavailable required resource lacks a documented fallback.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6.", "negative_left": "The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6.", "negative_right": "The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as inactive.", "right": "The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as active."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-083-004", "id": "scale-diverse-083-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Not ready: The session cannot proceed because a required resource is unavailable without a documented fallback, or an unresolved room-safety problem exists.", "1 — Conditionally ready: The session may proceed only by using a documented fallback for an unavailable required resource; the fallback is prepared and any repair or setup task is routed to the responsible team.", "2 — Ready with minor work: Every required resource is available, operational, and safely set up; only an optional or non-session-blocking task remains.", "3 — Fully ready: Every required resource and preferred enhancement is operational and correctly placed, all checklist items are complete, and no setup or repair task remains."], "instructions": "Rate the session’s operational readiness using the four levels. Resolve coreferences when interpreting equipment status. A documented fallback permits the session to proceed conditionally. AV equipment repair belongs to Instructional Technology; furniture, outlets, and room-safety issues belong to Facilities; packet placement belongs to the teaching assistant.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Instructor", "text": "Field note for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214: the document camera and ceiling projector are the only required resources."}, {"speaker": "Records clerk", "text": "The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6."}, {"speaker": "Readiness clerk", "text": "The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as active."}, {"speaker": "Teaching assistant", "text": "All 24 authorized print sets are complete, labeled, and prepared at the student tables for tomorrow’s use."}, {"speaker": "Readiness coordinator", "text": "No other documented fallback is recorded. The ceiling projector is available, operational, securely mounted, and safely set up. Inspection confirms clear exits, sound furniture, working outlets, and no unresolved room-safety problem. Every repair or setup task has been routed according to the readiness instructions: the camera repair to Instructional Technology and packet placement to the teaching assistant; no Facilities task remains."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-083", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "2e11a3a488935548c32b5df8e94e7d5305f2e363ee90fccc7631daffc644335a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing readiness criteria and routing rules, while both contexts retain the same lesson, room, date, required resources, fallback authorization, and preparation facts. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only slot F-6 from active to inactive; prepared print sets can coherently exist even when their fallback slot is inactive, and no unchanged assertion says the slot is active. Neither context contains a score, gold answer, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a3": "supported"}, "right": {"a3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; universally quantified atoms such as readiness of all other required resources or routing of all tasks remain atomic. The focus atom concerns the factual applicability of a particular fallback, not a policy classification. The base and counter assignments differ only on that focus and are realizable: the authorization can exist while either applying or not applying as the fallback, and the absence of any other fallback is consistent in both cases. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing readiness criteria, routing rules, and fallback policy are already preserved in the unchanged questions object; no additional substantive policy originates in the state.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes an unavailable required document camera, an applicable and prepared documented fallback, readiness of every other required resource, absence of an unresolved room-safety issue, and proper routing of all setup or repair tasks. Because a required resource remains unavailable, levels 2 and 3 are excluded, while the prepared fallback satisfies level 1.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction establishes that a required resource is unavailable, the identified print-set authorization does not apply as its documented fallback, and no other documented fallback exists. Therefore the unavailable required resource lacks a documented fallback, which is sufficient for level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The document camera is a required resource for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The document camera is unavailable for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The lesson plan’s authorization of 24 labeled print sets applies as a documented fallback for the unavailable document camera in tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "All 24 labeled print sets authorized by the lesson plan are prepared for use in tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "No documented fallback other than the lesson plan’s authorization of 24 labeled print sets exists for the document camera in tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every required resource other than the document camera is available for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Every required resource other than the document camera is operational for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every required resource other than the document camera is safely set up for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "An unresolved room-safety problem exists in B214 for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Every repair or setup task for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214 is routed to the responsible team specified by the readiness instructions."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Instructor\",\"text\":\"Field note for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214: the document camera and ceiling projector are the only required resources.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Records clerk\",\"text\":\"The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Readiness clerk\",\"text\":\"The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as active.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Teaching assistant\",\"text\":\"All 24 authorized print sets are complete, labeled, and prepared at the student tables for tomorrow’s use.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Readiness coordinator\",\"text\":\"No other documented fallback is recorded. The ceiling projector is available, operational, securely mounted, and safely set up. Inspection confirms clear exits, sound furniture, working outlets, and no unresolved room-safety problem. Every repair or setup task has been routed according to the readiness instructions: the camera repair to Instructional Technology and packet placement to the teaching assistant; no Facilities task remains.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as active."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The unavailable document camera is required, its sole documented fallback applies and is prepared, every other required resource is available, operational, and safely set up, no unresolved room-safety problem exists, and every repair or setup task is routed to the responsible team.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required document camera is unavailable, the plan’s 24-set authorization does not apply as its documented fallback, and no other documented fallback exists; therefore, an unavailable required resource lacks a documented fallback.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6.", "negative_left": "The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6.", "negative_right": "The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as inactive.", "right": "The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as active."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-083-004", "id": "scale-diverse-083-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Not ready: The session cannot proceed because a required resource is unavailable without a documented fallback, or an unresolved room-safety problem exists.", "1 — Conditionally ready: The session may proceed only by using a documented fallback for an unavailable required resource; the fallback is prepared and any repair or setup task is routed to the responsible team.", "2 — Ready with minor work: Every required resource is available, operational, and safely set up; only an optional or non-session-blocking task remains.", "3 — Fully ready: Every required resource and preferred enhancement is operational and correctly placed, all checklist items are complete, and no setup or repair task remains."], "instructions": "Rate the session’s operational readiness using the four levels. Resolve coreferences when interpreting equipment status. A documented fallback permits the session to proceed conditionally. AV equipment repair belongs to Instructional Technology; furniture, outlets, and room-safety issues belong to Facilities; packet placement belongs to the teaching assistant.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Instructor", "text": "Field note for tomorrow’s source-analysis lesson in B214: the document camera and ceiling projector are the only required resources."}, {"speaker": "Records clerk", "text": "The signed lesson plan for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 places its authorization of 24 labeled print sets exclusively in documented-fallback slot F-6."}, {"speaker": "Readiness clerk", "text": "The 07:35 readiness record for the source-analysis lesson in B214 on 18 September 2026 records the document camera as unavailable and slot F-6 as inactive."}, {"speaker": "Teaching assistant", "text": "All 24 authorized print sets are complete, labeled, and prepared at the student tables for tomorrow’s use."}, {"speaker": "Readiness coordinator", "text": "No other documented fallback is recorded. The ceiling projector is available, operational, securely mounted, and safely set up. Inspection confirms clear exits, sound furniture, working outlets, and no unresolved room-safety problem. Every repair or setup task has been routed according to the readiness instructions: the camera repair to Instructional Technology and packet placement to the teaching assistant; no Facilities task remains."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-083", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "2e11a3a488935548c32b5df8e94e7d5305f2e363ee90fccc7631daffc644335a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original readiness rubric’s governing distinctions and preserve the Room B12, 10:00 lesson, documented-requirement, routing, and timing bindings. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences rather than policy text or instructions. The counterfactual coherently changes the contemporaneous technician roster so that Leon Pike is the sole instructional technology technician while Mara Voss remains the assigned delivery worker; stating that they are distinct avoids identity ambiguity, and an assignment to a non-technician is not itself contradictory. Neither context contains a score, gold answer, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a6 is an allowable universally quantified scope fact rather than a bundled outcome classification. The focus atom a14 is factual. Base and counter assignments differ only on a14 and are jointly realizable because a different delivery worker can still have a confirmed pre-class delivery time. Empty policy_evidence is correct because all governing rubric, routing, scope, and priority rules originate in the retained questions object, while the original state supplies case observations rather than additional policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction exhaustively identifies the documented requirements and establishes that all present items are adequate. The two open gaps are routed to the policy-designated teams with functional completion confirmed before class, while the incomplete checklist excludes level 3. This is sufficient for conditional readiness, level 2.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The required adapter is absent and its assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician. Thus the documented gap is not confirmed as routed to the correct responsible team, satisfying level 1 despite confirmed timely delivery and functionality. The remaining conditions exclude unrelated deficiencies and establish no unavoidable start-time failure requiring level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson specifies six groups of four as the required arrangement of the 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for one working display."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for an HDMI adapter."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 microscope worksheets."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every documented requirement for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is one of the chair-count, chair-arrangement, working-display, HDMI-adapter, or microscope-worksheet requirements."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Room B12’s movable chairs are currently arranged in the specified six groups of four."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The task of arranging Room B12’s chairs in six groups of four is assigned to the facilities coordinator."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The facilities coordinator’s confirmed completion time for arranging Room B12’s chairs is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Room B12 contains the display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is functional."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "The required HDMI adapter is currently present in Room B12."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "The worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is the instructional technology technician."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The assigned HDMI-adapter delivery worker’s confirmed delivery time is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The HDMI adapter assigned for delivery to Room B12 has passed a functionality test."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The number of microscope worksheets available for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is 24."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The setup checklist for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is complete."}], "base_state_json": "\"Evidence reconciliation for Room B12: The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists exactly these requirements: 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, an HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets. The room contains all 24 movable chairs, but they remain in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to regroup them and confirms completion by 9:20. The display intended for the lesson is in the room and passed its functionality test. The required adapter is currently absent. At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Mara Voss as the instructional technology technician for Room B12. The delivery is confirmed for 9:15, and that adapter has passed a functionality test. Twenty-four microscope worksheets are available. The setup checklist remains incomplete.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"path": [], "text": "The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Mara Voss as the instructional technology technician for Room B12."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "All documented requirements are enumerated. The display, chair count, worksheet count, and incoming adapter functionality are established. The two remaining gaps—chair arrangement and adapter presence—are assigned to the policy-designated teams with completion confirmed before 10:00. Because the checklist is not yet complete, conditional readiness rather than high readiness applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The documented adapter requirement remains unresolved because the adapter is absent. Although a functional adapter has a confirmed pre-class delivery time, the assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician required by the routing policy. The correct responsible team is therefore not confirmed, which is sufficient for limited readiness and requires the session to remain on hold.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.", "negative_left": "At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.", "negative_right": "The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Leon Pike as Room B12's sole instructional technology technician and records Leon Pike and Mara Voss as distinct people.", "right": "The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Mara Voss as the instructional technology technician for Room B12."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-084-002", "id": "scale-diverse-084-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Low readiness: The session cannot proceed because at least one documented critical requirement will be unavailable or nonfunctional at the start time, even after feasible routing.", "1 — Limited readiness: A documented requirement is unresolved, and either the correct responsible team or completion before the start time is not confirmed; the session must remain on hold.", "2 — Conditional readiness: Requirements are documented, and any remaining required setup or equipment gaps have been routed to the correct teams with confirmed completion before class; proceed only after the setup checklist confirms completion.", "3 — High readiness: Every documented requirement is already present, functional, and arranged as specified, with the setup checklist complete and no required tasks open."], "instructions": "Rate operational readiness using the ordered rubric. Consider only documented lesson requirements; unrelated room defects and unused backup equipment are distractors. Route technology or adapter work to the instructional technology technician, furniture arrangement to the facilities coordinator, and learning-material preparation to the teaching assistant. Select the single best level index.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Evidence reconciliation for Room B12: The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists exactly these requirements: 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, an HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets. The room contains all 24 movable chairs, but they remain in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to regroup them and confirms completion by 9:20. The display intended for the lesson is in the room and passed its functionality test. The required adapter is currently absent. At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Mara Voss as the instructional technology technician for Room B12. The delivery is confirmed for 9:15, and that adapter has passed a functionality test. Twenty-four microscope worksheets are available. The setup checklist remains incomplete."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-084", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "5f733b452b38156ea6a86432f9524e3bf6c0d9bcb4fbc4d38bc8439a9a038542", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original readiness rubric’s governing distinctions and preserve the Room B12, 10:00 lesson, documented-requirement, routing, and timing bindings. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences rather than policy text or instructions. The counterfactual coherently changes the contemporaneous technician roster so that Leon Pike is the sole instructional technology technician while Mara Voss remains the assigned delivery worker; stating that they are distinct avoids identity ambiguity, and an assignment to a non-technician is not itself contradictory. Neither context contains a score, gold answer, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a6 is an allowable universally quantified scope fact rather than a bundled outcome classification. The focus atom a14 is factual. Base and counter assignments differ only on a14 and are jointly realizable because a different delivery worker can still have a confirmed pre-class delivery time. Empty policy_evidence is correct because all governing rubric, routing, scope, and priority rules originate in the retained questions object, while the original state supplies case observations rather than additional policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction exhaustively identifies the documented requirements and establishes that all present items are adequate. The two open gaps are routed to the policy-designated teams with functional completion confirmed before class, while the incomplete checklist excludes level 3. This is sufficient for conditional readiness, level 2.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The required adapter is absent and its assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician. Thus the documented gap is not confirmed as routed to the correct responsible team, satisfying level 1 despite confirmed timely delivery and functionality. The remaining conditions exclude unrelated deficiencies and establish no unavoidable start-time failure requiring level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson specifies six groups of four as the required arrangement of the 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for one working display."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for an HDMI adapter."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 microscope worksheets."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every documented requirement for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is one of the chair-count, chair-arrangement, working-display, HDMI-adapter, or microscope-worksheet requirements."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Room B12’s movable chairs are currently arranged in the specified six groups of four."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The task of arranging Room B12’s chairs in six groups of four is assigned to the facilities coordinator."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The facilities coordinator’s confirmed completion time for arranging Room B12’s chairs is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Room B12 contains the display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is functional."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "The required HDMI adapter is currently present in Room B12."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "The worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is the instructional technology technician."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The assigned HDMI-adapter delivery worker’s confirmed delivery time is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The HDMI adapter assigned for delivery to Room B12 has passed a functionality test."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The number of microscope worksheets available for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is 24."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The setup checklist for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is complete."}], "base_state_json": "\"Evidence reconciliation for Room B12: The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists exactly these requirements: 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, an HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets. The room contains all 24 movable chairs, but they remain in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to regroup them and confirms completion by 9:20. The display intended for the lesson is in the room and passed its functionality test. The required adapter is currently absent. At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Mara Voss as the instructional technology technician for Room B12. The delivery is confirmed for 9:15, and that adapter has passed a functionality test. Twenty-four microscope worksheets are available. The setup checklist remains incomplete.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"path": [], "text": "The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Mara Voss as the instructional technology technician for Room B12."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "All documented requirements are enumerated. The display, chair count, worksheet count, and incoming adapter functionality are established. The two remaining gaps—chair arrangement and adapter presence—are assigned to the policy-designated teams with completion confirmed before 10:00. Because the checklist is not yet complete, conditional readiness rather than high readiness applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The documented adapter requirement remains unresolved because the adapter is absent. Although a functional adapter has a confirmed pre-class delivery time, the assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician required by the routing policy. The correct responsible team is therefore not confirmed, which is sufficient for limited readiness and requires the session to remain on hold.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.", "negative_left": "At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.", "negative_right": "The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Leon Pike as Room B12's sole instructional technology technician and records Leon Pike and Mara Voss as distinct people.", "right": "The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Mara Voss as the instructional technology technician for Room B12."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-084-002", "id": "scale-diverse-084-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Low readiness: The session cannot proceed because at least one documented critical requirement will be unavailable or nonfunctional at the start time, even after feasible routing.", "1 — Limited readiness: A documented requirement is unresolved, and either the correct responsible team or completion before the start time is not confirmed; the session must remain on hold.", "2 — Conditional readiness: Requirements are documented, and any remaining required setup or equipment gaps have been routed to the correct teams with confirmed completion before class; proceed only after the setup checklist confirms completion.", "3 — High readiness: Every documented requirement is already present, functional, and arranged as specified, with the setup checklist complete and no required tasks open."], "instructions": "Rate operational readiness using the ordered rubric. Consider only documented lesson requirements; unrelated room defects and unused backup equipment are distractors. Route technology or adapter work to the instructional technology technician, furniture arrangement to the facilities coordinator, and learning-material preparation to the teaching assistant. Select the single best level index.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Evidence reconciliation for Room B12: The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists exactly these requirements: 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, an HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets. The room contains all 24 movable chairs, but they remain in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to regroup them and confirms completion by 9:20. The display intended for the lesson is in the room and passed its functionality test. The required adapter is currently absent. At 09:12 on the lesson date, Room B12's delivery assignment record names Mara Voss as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. The personnel roster effective at 09:12 on the lesson date lists Leon Pike as Room B12's sole instructional technology technician and records Leon Pike and Mara Voss as distinct people. The delivery is confirmed for 9:15, and that adapter has passed a functionality test. Twenty-four microscope worksheets are available. The setup checklist remains incomplete."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-084", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "5f733b452b38156ea6a86432f9524e3bf6c0d9bcb4fbc4d38bc8439a9a038542", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original readiness rubric’s governing scope, responsible-team policy, 10:00 lesson, Room B12, and documented requirement bindings while changing only case observations. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual’s statement that H-731 is not the instructional technology technician is coherent with H-731 nevertheless being assigned the delivery; it makes the routing potentially improper but does not create a factual contradiction. Neither context embeds a score, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a6 is an allowable universally quantified scope fact rather than a bundled outcome classification. The focus atom a14 is factual. Base and counter assignments differ only on a14 and are jointly realizable because a different delivery worker can still have a confirmed pre-class delivery time. Empty policy_evidence is correct because all governing rubric, routing, scope, and priority rules originate in the retained questions object, while the original state supplies case observations rather than additional policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction exhaustively identifies the documented requirements and establishes that all present items are adequate. The two open gaps are routed to the policy-designated teams with functional completion confirmed before class, while the incomplete checklist excludes level 3. This is sufficient for conditional readiness, level 2.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The required adapter is absent and its assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician. Thus the documented gap is not confirmed as routed to the correct responsible team, satisfying level 1 despite confirmed timely delivery and functionality. The remaining conditions exclude unrelated deficiencies and establish no unavoidable start-time failure requiring level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson specifies six groups of four as the required arrangement of the 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for one working display."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for an HDMI adapter."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 microscope worksheets."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every documented requirement for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is one of the chair-count, chair-arrangement, working-display, HDMI-adapter, or microscope-worksheet requirements."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Room B12’s movable chairs are currently arranged in the specified six groups of four."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The task of arranging Room B12’s chairs in six groups of four is assigned to the facilities coordinator."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The facilities coordinator’s confirmed completion time for arranging Room B12’s chairs is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Room B12 contains the display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is functional."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "The required HDMI adapter is currently present in Room B12."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "The worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is the instructional technology technician."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The assigned HDMI-adapter delivery worker’s confirmed delivery time is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The HDMI adapter assigned for delivery to Room B12 has passed a functionality test."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The number of microscope worksheets available for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is 24."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The setup checklist for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is complete."}], "base_state_json": "\"The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists exactly five requirements: 24 movable chairs; six groups of four as their arrangement; one working display; an HDMI adapter; and 24 microscope worksheets. Room B12 contains all 24 movable chairs, but they are still in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to form the required groups and confirms completion at 09:40. The lesson’s intended display is in B12 and passed its functionality test. No HDMI adapter is currently in the room. The adapter designated for delivery passed a functionality test, and the handoff records its confirmed arrival at 09:35. The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12. At 09:20, employee H-731 is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. A verified count shows 24 microscope worksheets available. With the chair arrangement and adapter delivery still outstanding, the setup checklist remains incomplete.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 09:20, employee H-731 is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "All documented requirements are enumerated. The display, chair count, worksheet count, and incoming adapter functionality are established. The two remaining gaps—chair arrangement and adapter presence—are assigned to the policy-designated teams with completion confirmed before 10:00. Because the checklist is not yet complete, conditional readiness rather than high readiness applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The documented adapter requirement remains unresolved because the adapter is absent. Although a functional adapter has a confirmed pre-class delivery time, the assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician required by the routing policy. The correct responsible team is therefore not confirmed, which is sufficient for limited readiness and requires the session to remain on hold.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12.", "negative_left": "The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12.", "negative_right": "At 09:20, employee H-731 is not the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.", "right": "At 09:20, employee H-731 is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-084-003", "id": "scale-diverse-084-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Low readiness: The session cannot proceed because at least one documented critical requirement will be unavailable or nonfunctional at the start time, even after feasible routing.", "1 — Limited readiness: A documented requirement is unresolved, and either the correct responsible team or completion before the start time is not confirmed; the session must remain on hold.", "2 — Conditional readiness: Requirements are documented, and any remaining required setup or equipment gaps have been routed to the correct teams with confirmed completion before class; proceed only after the setup checklist confirms completion.", "3 — High readiness: Every documented requirement is already present, functional, and arranged as specified, with the setup checklist complete and no required tasks open."], "instructions": "Rate operational readiness using the ordered rubric. Consider only documented lesson requirements; unrelated room defects and unused backup equipment are distractors. Route technology or adapter work to the instructional technology technician, furniture arrangement to the facilities coordinator, and learning-material preparation to the teaching assistant. Select the single best level index.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists exactly five requirements: 24 movable chairs; six groups of four as their arrangement; one working display; an HDMI adapter; and 24 microscope worksheets. Room B12 contains all 24 movable chairs, but they are still in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to form the required groups and confirms completion at 09:40. The lesson’s intended display is in B12 and passed its functionality test. No HDMI adapter is currently in the room. The adapter designated for delivery passed a functionality test, and the handoff records its confirmed arrival at 09:35. The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12. At 09:20, employee H-731 is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. A verified count shows 24 microscope worksheets available. With the chair arrangement and adapter delivery still outstanding, the setup checklist remains incomplete."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-084", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "5f733b452b38156ea6a86432f9524e3bf6c0d9bcb4fbc4d38bc8439a9a038542", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original readiness rubric’s governing scope, responsible-team policy, 10:00 lesson, Room B12, and documented requirement bindings while changing only case observations. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual’s statement that H-731 is not the instructional technology technician is coherent with H-731 nevertheless being assigned the delivery; it makes the routing potentially improper but does not create a factual contradiction. Neither context embeds a score, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a6 is an allowable universally quantified scope fact rather than a bundled outcome classification. The focus atom a14 is factual. Base and counter assignments differ only on a14 and are jointly realizable because a different delivery worker can still have a confirmed pre-class delivery time. Empty policy_evidence is correct because all governing rubric, routing, scope, and priority rules originate in the retained questions object, while the original state supplies case observations rather than additional policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction exhaustively identifies the documented requirements and establishes that all present items are adequate. The two open gaps are routed to the policy-designated teams with functional completion confirmed before class, while the incomplete checklist excludes level 3. This is sufficient for conditional readiness, level 2.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The required adapter is absent and its assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician. Thus the documented gap is not confirmed as routed to the correct responsible team, satisfying level 1 despite confirmed timely delivery and functionality. The remaining conditions exclude unrelated deficiencies and establish no unavoidable start-time failure requiring level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson specifies six groups of four as the required arrangement of the 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for one working display."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for an HDMI adapter."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 microscope worksheets."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every documented requirement for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is one of the chair-count, chair-arrangement, working-display, HDMI-adapter, or microscope-worksheet requirements."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Room B12’s movable chairs are currently arranged in the specified six groups of four."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The task of arranging Room B12’s chairs in six groups of four is assigned to the facilities coordinator."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The facilities coordinator’s confirmed completion time for arranging Room B12’s chairs is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Room B12 contains the display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is functional."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "The required HDMI adapter is currently present in Room B12."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "The worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is the instructional technology technician."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The assigned HDMI-adapter delivery worker’s confirmed delivery time is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The HDMI adapter assigned for delivery to Room B12 has passed a functionality test."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The number of microscope worksheets available for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is 24."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The setup checklist for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is complete."}], "base_state_json": "\"The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists exactly five requirements: 24 movable chairs; six groups of four as their arrangement; one working display; an HDMI adapter; and 24 microscope worksheets. Room B12 contains all 24 movable chairs, but they are still in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to form the required groups and confirms completion at 09:40. The lesson’s intended display is in B12 and passed its functionality test. No HDMI adapter is currently in the room. The adapter designated for delivery passed a functionality test, and the handoff records its confirmed arrival at 09:35. The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12. At 09:20, employee H-731 is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. A verified count shows 24 microscope worksheets available. With the chair arrangement and adapter delivery still outstanding, the setup checklist remains incomplete.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 09:20, employee H-731 is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "All documented requirements are enumerated. The display, chair count, worksheet count, and incoming adapter functionality are established. The two remaining gaps—chair arrangement and adapter presence—are assigned to the policy-designated teams with completion confirmed before 10:00. Because the checklist is not yet complete, conditional readiness rather than high readiness applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The documented adapter requirement remains unresolved because the adapter is absent. Although a functional adapter has a confirmed pre-class delivery time, the assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician required by the routing policy. The correct responsible team is therefore not confirmed, which is sufficient for limited readiness and requires the session to remain on hold.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12.", "negative_left": "The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12.", "negative_right": "At 09:20, employee H-731 is not the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.", "right": "At 09:20, employee H-731 is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-084-003", "id": "scale-diverse-084-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Low readiness: The session cannot proceed because at least one documented critical requirement will be unavailable or nonfunctional at the start time, even after feasible routing.", "1 — Limited readiness: A documented requirement is unresolved, and either the correct responsible team or completion before the start time is not confirmed; the session must remain on hold.", "2 — Conditional readiness: Requirements are documented, and any remaining required setup or equipment gaps have been routed to the correct teams with confirmed completion before class; proceed only after the setup checklist confirms completion.", "3 — High readiness: Every documented requirement is already present, functional, and arranged as specified, with the setup checklist complete and no required tasks open."], "instructions": "Rate operational readiness using the ordered rubric. Consider only documented lesson requirements; unrelated room defects and unused backup equipment are distractors. Route technology or adapter work to the instructional technology technician, furniture arrangement to the facilities coordinator, and learning-material preparation to the teaching assistant. Select the single best level index.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists exactly five requirements: 24 movable chairs; six groups of four as their arrangement; one working display; an HDMI adapter; and 24 microscope worksheets. Room B12 contains all 24 movable chairs, but they are still in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to form the required groups and confirms completion at 09:40. The lesson’s intended display is in B12 and passed its functionality test. No HDMI adapter is currently in the room. The adapter designated for delivery passed a functionality test, and the handoff records its confirmed arrival at 09:35. The 09:20 operational handoff for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson assigns employee H-731 to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12. At 09:20, employee H-731 is not the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. A verified count shows 24 microscope worksheets available. With the chair arrangement and adapter delivery still outstanding, the setup checklist remains incomplete."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-084", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "5f733b452b38156ea6a86432f9524e3bf6c0d9bcb4fbc4d38bc8439a9a038542", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the complete readiness rubric and routing policy, while both contexts retain the same lesson, room, requirements, start time, and decision scope. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only Mara Venn’s technician-role status; this remains coherent with the dispatch and confirmed delivery facts, although it changes whether the assignment is routed to the policy-specified role. Neither context includes a score, gold answer, rule table, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a6 is an allowable universally quantified scope fact rather than a bundled outcome classification. The focus atom a14 is factual. Base and counter assignments differ only on a14 and are jointly realizable because a different delivery worker can still have a confirmed pre-class delivery time. Empty policy_evidence is correct because all governing rubric, routing, scope, and priority rules originate in the retained questions object, while the original state supplies case observations rather than additional policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction exhaustively identifies the documented requirements and establishes that all present items are adequate. The two open gaps are routed to the policy-designated teams with functional completion confirmed before class, while the incomplete checklist excludes level 3. This is sufficient for conditional readiness, level 2.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The required adapter is absent and its assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician. Thus the documented gap is not confirmed as routed to the correct responsible team, satisfying level 1 despite confirmed timely delivery and functionality. The remaining conditions exclude unrelated deficiencies and establish no unavoidable start-time failure requiring level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson specifies six groups of four as the required arrangement of the 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for one working display."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for an HDMI adapter."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 microscope worksheets."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every documented requirement for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is one of the chair-count, chair-arrangement, working-display, HDMI-adapter, or microscope-worksheet requirements."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Room B12’s movable chairs are currently arranged in the specified six groups of four."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The task of arranging Room B12’s chairs in six groups of four is assigned to the facilities coordinator."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The facilities coordinator’s confirmed completion time for arranging Room B12’s chairs is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Room B12 contains the display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is functional."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "The required HDMI adapter is currently present in Room B12."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "The worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is the instructional technology technician."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The assigned HDMI-adapter delivery worker’s confirmed delivery time is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The HDMI adapter assigned for delivery to Room B12 has passed a functionality test."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The number of microscope worksheets available for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is 24."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The setup checklist for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is complete."}], "base_state_json": "\"09:25 field note — The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson requires 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, one HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets; it lists no other requirements. Room B12 contains all 24 movable chairs, but they remain in rows. Chair grouping is assigned to the facilities coordinator, who confirms completion by 09:40. The display intended for the lesson is in B12 and passed its functional check. The required HDMI adapter is not currently in the room. The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12. Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who holds the instructional technology technician position. The assigned adapter passed testing, and delivery is confirmed for 09:35. Exactly 24 microscope worksheets are available. With the chair arrangement and adapter delivery still open, the lesson setup checklist remains incomplete.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12."}, {"path": [], "text": "Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who holds the instructional technology technician position."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "All documented requirements are enumerated. The display, chair count, worksheet count, and incoming adapter functionality are established. The two remaining gaps—chair arrangement and adapter presence—are assigned to the policy-designated teams with completion confirmed before 10:00. Because the checklist is not yet complete, conditional readiness rather than high readiness applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The documented adapter requirement remains unresolved because the adapter is absent. Although a functional adapter has a confirmed pre-class delivery time, the assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician required by the routing policy. The correct responsible team is therefore not confirmed, which is sufficient for limited readiness and requires the session to remain on hold.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12.", "negative_left": "The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12.", "negative_right": "Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who does not hold the instructional technology technician position.", "right": "Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who holds the instructional technology technician position."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-084-004", "id": "scale-diverse-084-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Low readiness: The session cannot proceed because at least one documented critical requirement will be unavailable or nonfunctional at the start time, even after feasible routing.", "1 — Limited readiness: A documented requirement is unresolved, and either the correct responsible team or completion before the start time is not confirmed; the session must remain on hold.", "2 — Conditional readiness: Requirements are documented, and any remaining required setup or equipment gaps have been routed to the correct teams with confirmed completion before class; proceed only after the setup checklist confirms completion.", "3 — High readiness: Every documented requirement is already present, functional, and arranged as specified, with the setup checklist complete and no required tasks open."], "instructions": "Rate operational readiness using the ordered rubric. Consider only documented lesson requirements; unrelated room defects and unused backup equipment are distractors. Route technology or adapter work to the instructional technology technician, furniture arrangement to the facilities coordinator, and learning-material preparation to the teaching assistant. Select the single best level index.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "09:25 field note — The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson requires 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, one HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets; it lists no other requirements. Room B12 contains all 24 movable chairs, but they remain in rows. Chair grouping is assigned to the facilities coordinator, who confirms completion by 09:40. The display intended for the lesson is in B12 and passed its functional check. The required HDMI adapter is not currently in the room. The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12. Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who holds the instructional technology technician position. The assigned adapter passed testing, and delivery is confirmed for 09:35. Exactly 24 microscope worksheets are available. With the chair arrangement and adapter delivery still open, the lesson setup checklist remains incomplete."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-084", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "5f733b452b38156ea6a86432f9524e3bf6c0d9bcb4fbc4d38bc8439a9a038542", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the complete readiness rubric and routing policy, while both contexts retain the same lesson, room, requirements, start time, and decision scope. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only Mara Venn’s technician-role status; this remains coherent with the dispatch and confirmed delivery facts, although it changes whether the assignment is routed to the policy-specified role. Neither context includes a score, gold answer, rule table, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a6 is an allowable universally quantified scope fact rather than a bundled outcome classification. The focus atom a14 is factual. Base and counter assignments differ only on a14 and are jointly realizable because a different delivery worker can still have a confirmed pre-class delivery time. Empty policy_evidence is correct because all governing rubric, routing, scope, and priority rules originate in the retained questions object, while the original state supplies case observations rather than additional policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction exhaustively identifies the documented requirements and establishes that all present items are adequate. The two open gaps are routed to the policy-designated teams with functional completion confirmed before class, while the incomplete checklist excludes level 3. This is sufficient for conditional readiness, level 2.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The required adapter is absent and its assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician. Thus the documented gap is not confirmed as routed to the correct responsible team, satisfying level 1 despite confirmed timely delivery and functionality. The remaining conditions exclude unrelated deficiencies and establish no unavoidable start-time failure requiring level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson specifies six groups of four as the required arrangement of the 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for one working display."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for an HDMI adapter."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 microscope worksheets."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every documented requirement for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is one of the chair-count, chair-arrangement, working-display, HDMI-adapter, or microscope-worksheet requirements."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Room B12’s movable chairs are currently arranged in the specified six groups of four."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The task of arranging Room B12’s chairs in six groups of four is assigned to the facilities coordinator."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The facilities coordinator’s confirmed completion time for arranging Room B12’s chairs is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Room B12 contains the display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is functional."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "The required HDMI adapter is currently present in Room B12."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "The worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is the instructional technology technician."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The assigned HDMI-adapter delivery worker’s confirmed delivery time is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The HDMI adapter assigned for delivery to Room B12 has passed a functionality test."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The number of microscope worksheets available for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is 24."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The setup checklist for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is complete."}], "base_state_json": "\"09:25 field note — The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson requires 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, one HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets; it lists no other requirements. Room B12 contains all 24 movable chairs, but they remain in rows. Chair grouping is assigned to the facilities coordinator, who confirms completion by 09:40. The display intended for the lesson is in B12 and passed its functional check. The required HDMI adapter is not currently in the room. The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12. Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who holds the instructional technology technician position. The assigned adapter passed testing, and delivery is confirmed for 09:35. Exactly 24 microscope worksheets are available. With the chair arrangement and adapter delivery still open, the lesson setup checklist remains incomplete.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12."}, {"path": [], "text": "Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who holds the instructional technology technician position."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "All documented requirements are enumerated. The display, chair count, worksheet count, and incoming adapter functionality are established. The two remaining gaps—chair arrangement and adapter presence—are assigned to the policy-designated teams with completion confirmed before 10:00. Because the checklist is not yet complete, conditional readiness rather than high readiness applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The documented adapter requirement remains unresolved because the adapter is absent. Although a functional adapter has a confirmed pre-class delivery time, the assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician required by the routing policy. The correct responsible team is therefore not confirmed, which is sufficient for limited readiness and requires the session to remain on hold.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12.", "negative_left": "The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12.", "negative_right": "Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who does not hold the instructional technology technician position.", "right": "Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who holds the instructional technology technician position."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-084-004", "id": "scale-diverse-084-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Low readiness: The session cannot proceed because at least one documented critical requirement will be unavailable or nonfunctional at the start time, even after feasible routing.", "1 — Limited readiness: A documented requirement is unresolved, and either the correct responsible team or completion before the start time is not confirmed; the session must remain on hold.", "2 — Conditional readiness: Requirements are documented, and any remaining required setup or equipment gaps have been routed to the correct teams with confirmed completion before class; proceed only after the setup checklist confirms completion.", "3 — High readiness: Every documented requirement is already present, functional, and arranged as specified, with the setup checklist complete and no required tasks open."], "instructions": "Rate operational readiness using the ordered rubric. Consider only documented lesson requirements; unrelated room defects and unused backup equipment are distractors. Route technology or adapter work to the instructional technology technician, furniture arrangement to the facilities coordinator, and learning-material preparation to the teaching assistant. Select the single best level index.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "09:25 field note — The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson requires 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, one HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets; it lists no other requirements. Room B12 contains all 24 movable chairs, but they remain in rows. Chair grouping is assigned to the facilities coordinator, who confirms completion by 09:40. The display intended for the lesson is in B12 and passed its functional check. The required HDMI adapter is not currently in the room. The signed 09:12 dispatch record for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson identifies employee badge QX-731 as the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12. Employee badge QX-731 has exactly one holder, Mara Venn, who does not hold the instructional technology technician position. The assigned adapter passed testing, and delivery is confirmed for 09:35. Exactly 24 microscope worksheets are available. With the chair arrangement and adapter delivery still open, the lesson setup checklist remains incomplete."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-084", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "5f733b452b38156ea6a86432f9524e3bf6c0d9bcb4fbc4d38bc8439a9a038542", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same governing policy, request, hotel, guest, rooms, feature criteria, and immediate-assignment timing. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual changes only JX-53’s room number from 420 to 214. Linking CV-7 to room 214 is compatible with the unchanged statement that room 214’s shower is documented; the validation may be redundant but is not contradictory. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, proposition label, rule table, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "refuted", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a12": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a12": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a12": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a12": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a12": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a12": "supported"}, "right": {"a12": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual relationship; the exact-set and universal atoms remain atomic despite quantification. The focus, whether CV-7 identifies room 420, is factual rather than policy. Base and counter assignments can both occur with only that identification relation changing and without violating the original policy. Policy evidence cites the original state and preserves the hard-feature scope, coordinator exception, housekeeping limitation, ranking priority, and relevant reservation requirements; rules already contained in the unchanged questions need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that CV-7 is a timely coordinator-issued roll-in-shower validation applying to room 420. The stated exception therefore resolves 420’s pending feature. With two beds and quiet status, 420 outranks verified but non-quiet 214; 318 remains conflicting because its register lacks a documented roll-in shower and housekeeping cannot override it.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction establishes that the sole timely coordinator roll-in-shower validation does not apply to room 420, so 420 remains pending. Room 214 has both hard requirements documented and must rank first; policy places pending 420 above conflicting 318, while the unresolved claims are routed as specified by the corresponding choice.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of rooms available for Mara Venn’s immediate assignment at Harbor Lantern Hotel consists exactly of rooms 214, 420, and 318."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 214 has two double beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The current accessibility register documents a roll-in shower for room 214 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Room 214 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Room 420 has two queen beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Room 420 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The current accessibility register marks room 420’s roll-in-shower status as pending post-renovation validation at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 was issued by the Harbor Lantern Hotel property accessibility coordinator."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 validates a roll-in-shower feature."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 was completed no later than Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Every property-accessibility-coordinator roll-in-shower validation completed no later than Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time is recorded as CV-7."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 identifies room 420 as the room to which its validation applies."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "Room 318 has two queen beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "Room 318 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The current accessibility register lists a tub for room 318 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The current accessibility register does not document a roll-in shower for room 318 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The housekeeping supervisor verbally claims at the immediate-assignment decision time that room 318 has a roll-in shower."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required.\",\"timing\":\"All room observations and records below were checked at Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time.\",\"evidence\":[\"The rooms available for immediate assignment are exactly 214, 420, and 318.\",\"In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53.\",\"Reference card JX-53 displays room number 420 as its sole room number.\",\"Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms.\",\"Room 214 has two double beds, and the current accessibility register documents its roll-in shower. It does not fulfill Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference.\",\"Room 420 has two queen beds and fulfills the quiet-location preference. Its roll-in-shower status remains marked pending post-renovation validation in the current accessibility register.\",\"CV-7 was issued by the hotel’s property accessibility coordinator, validates a roll-in-shower feature, and was completed by the decision time. Every property-accessibility-coordinator roll-in-shower validation completed by then is recorded as CV-7.\",\"Room 318 has two queen beds and fulfills the quiet-location preference. The current register lists a tub and does not document a roll-in shower. The housekeeping supervisor nevertheless verbally claims that it has one.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a12", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Reference card JX-53 displays room number 420 as its sole room number."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims."}], "rules": [{"justification": "CV-7 is a timely roll-in-shower validation issued by the authorized coordinator, and it applies to room 420. Thus the exception verifies 420’s pending shower feature. Room 420 has two queens and fulfills the quiet preference, so it ranks above verified but non-quiet room 214. Room 318 remains conflicting because its register does not document a roll-in shower and the housekeeping claim cannot override that record.", "target": "assign_420_as_best_fit", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "CV-7 is the sole timely coordinator roll-in-shower validation, but it does not apply to room 420. Therefore 420 remains pending. Room 214 has both hard requirements documented and ranks first; policy places pending room 420 above conflicting room 318. Room 420’s pending feature and room 318’s register-conflicting housekeeping claim require routing to the property accessibility coordinator.", "target": "assign_214_and_route_exceptions", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53.", "negative_left": "In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53.", "negative_right": "Reference card JX-53 displays room number 214 as its sole room number.", "right": "Reference card JX-53 displays room number 420 as its sole room number."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-097-002", "id": "scale-diverse-097-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"assign_214_and_route_exceptions": "Assign 214; judge its two-bed and roll-in-shower requirements fulfilled and its quiet preference unfulfilled. Rank 214 > 420 > 318. Route 420’s pending feature and 318’s conflicting shower claim to the property accessibility coordinator.", "assign_318_on_housekeeping_authority": "Assign 318 based on the housekeeping supervisor’s statement; judge all requirements and the quiet preference fulfilled, rank 318 > 420 > 214, and route only 420 to the housekeeping supervisor.", "assign_420_as_best_fit": "Assign 420 because it is quiet and has two queens; judge both hard requirements fulfilled, rank 420 > 214 > 318, and do not seek coordinator review."}, "instructions": "Select exactly one option. Apply the documented-feature scope and its coordinator-validation exception before considering the quiet-room preference.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required.", "evidence": ["The rooms available for immediate assignment are exactly 214, 420, and 318.", "In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53.", "Reference card JX-53 displays room number 420 as its sole room number.", "Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms.", "Room 214 has two double beds, and the current accessibility register documents its roll-in shower. It does not fulfill Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference.", "Room 420 has two queen beds and fulfills the quiet-location preference. Its roll-in-shower status remains marked pending post-renovation validation in the current accessibility register.", "CV-7 was issued by the hotel’s property accessibility coordinator, validates a roll-in-shower feature, and was completed by the decision time. Every property-accessibility-coordinator roll-in-shower validation completed by then is recorded as CV-7.", "Room 318 has two queen beds and fulfills the quiet-location preference. The current register lists a tub and does not document a roll-in shower. The housekeeping supervisor nevertheless verbally claims that it has one."], "request": "Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims.", "timing": "All room observations and records below were checked at Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-097", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "0d82a6d8203d5a4979dbe77ba5afba2aabb74ec994a2ed22710bf83ce7628ec5", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "assign_420_as_best_fit"}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same governing policy, request, hotel, guest, rooms, feature criteria, and immediate-assignment timing. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual changes only JX-53’s room number from 420 to 214. Linking CV-7 to room 214 is compatible with the unchanged statement that room 214’s shower is documented; the validation may be redundant but is not contradictory. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, proposition label, rule table, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "refuted", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "refuted", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a12": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a12": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a12": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a12": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a12": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a12": "supported"}, "right": {"a12": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual relationship; the exact-set and universal atoms remain atomic despite quantification. The focus, whether CV-7 identifies room 420, is factual rather than policy. Base and counter assignments can both occur with only that identification relation changing and without violating the original policy. Policy evidence cites the original state and preserves the hard-feature scope, coordinator exception, housekeeping limitation, ranking priority, and relevant reservation requirements; rules already contained in the unchanged questions need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that CV-7 is a timely coordinator-issued roll-in-shower validation applying to room 420. The stated exception therefore resolves 420’s pending feature. With two beds and quiet status, 420 outranks verified but non-quiet 214; 318 remains conflicting because its register lacks a documented roll-in shower and housekeeping cannot override it.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction establishes that the sole timely coordinator roll-in-shower validation does not apply to room 420, so 420 remains pending. Room 214 has both hard requirements documented and must rank first; policy places pending 420 above conflicting 318, while the unresolved claims are routed as specified by the corresponding choice.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of rooms available for Mara Venn’s immediate assignment at Harbor Lantern Hotel consists exactly of rooms 214, 420, and 318."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 214 has two double beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The current accessibility register documents a roll-in shower for room 214 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Room 214 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Room 420 has two queen beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Room 420 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The current accessibility register marks room 420’s roll-in-shower status as pending post-renovation validation at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 was issued by the Harbor Lantern Hotel property accessibility coordinator."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 validates a roll-in-shower feature."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 was completed no later than Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Every property-accessibility-coordinator roll-in-shower validation completed no later than Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time is recorded as CV-7."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 identifies room 420 as the room to which its validation applies."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "Room 318 has two queen beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "Room 318 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The current accessibility register lists a tub for room 318 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The current accessibility register does not document a roll-in shower for room 318 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The housekeeping supervisor verbally claims at the immediate-assignment decision time that room 318 has a roll-in shower."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required.\",\"timing\":\"All room observations and records below were checked at Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time.\",\"evidence\":[\"The rooms available for immediate assignment are exactly 214, 420, and 318.\",\"In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53.\",\"Reference card JX-53 displays room number 420 as its sole room number.\",\"Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms.\",\"Room 214 has two double beds, and the current accessibility register documents its roll-in shower. It does not fulfill Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference.\",\"Room 420 has two queen beds and fulfills the quiet-location preference. Its roll-in-shower status remains marked pending post-renovation validation in the current accessibility register.\",\"CV-7 was issued by the hotel’s property accessibility coordinator, validates a roll-in-shower feature, and was completed by the decision time. Every property-accessibility-coordinator roll-in-shower validation completed by then is recorded as CV-7.\",\"Room 318 has two queen beds and fulfills the quiet-location preference. The current register lists a tub and does not document a roll-in shower. The housekeeping supervisor nevertheless verbally claims that it has one.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a12", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Reference card JX-53 displays room number 420 as its sole room number."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims."}], "rules": [{"justification": "CV-7 is a timely roll-in-shower validation issued by the authorized coordinator, and it applies to room 420. Thus the exception verifies 420’s pending shower feature. Room 420 has two queens and fulfills the quiet preference, so it ranks above verified but non-quiet room 214. Room 318 remains conflicting because its register does not document a roll-in shower and the housekeeping claim cannot override that record.", "target": "assign_420_as_best_fit", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "CV-7 is the sole timely coordinator roll-in-shower validation, but it does not apply to room 420. Therefore 420 remains pending. Room 214 has both hard requirements documented and ranks first; policy places pending room 420 above conflicting room 318. Room 420’s pending feature and room 318’s register-conflicting housekeeping claim require routing to the property accessibility coordinator.", "target": "assign_214_and_route_exceptions", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53.", "negative_left": "In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53.", "negative_right": "Reference card JX-53 displays room number 214 as its sole room number.", "right": "Reference card JX-53 displays room number 420 as its sole room number."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-097-002", "id": "scale-diverse-097-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"assign_214_and_route_exceptions": "Assign 214; judge its two-bed and roll-in-shower requirements fulfilled and its quiet preference unfulfilled. Rank 214 > 420 > 318. Route 420’s pending feature and 318’s conflicting shower claim to the property accessibility coordinator.", "assign_318_on_housekeeping_authority": "Assign 318 based on the housekeeping supervisor’s statement; judge all requirements and the quiet preference fulfilled, rank 318 > 420 > 214, and route only 420 to the housekeeping supervisor.", "assign_420_as_best_fit": "Assign 420 because it is quiet and has two queens; judge both hard requirements fulfilled, rank 420 > 214 > 318, and do not seek coordinator review."}, "instructions": "Select exactly one option. Apply the documented-feature scope and its coordinator-validation exception before considering the quiet-room preference.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required.", "evidence": ["The rooms available for immediate assignment are exactly 214, 420, and 318.", "In the completed coordinator validation record CV-7, the sole room-number field contains exactly the number printed on reference card JX-53.", "Reference card JX-53 displays room number 214 as its sole room number.", "Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms.", "Room 214 has two double beds, and the current accessibility register documents its roll-in shower. It does not fulfill Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference.", "Room 420 has two queen beds and fulfills the quiet-location preference. Its roll-in-shower status remains marked pending post-renovation validation in the current accessibility register.", "CV-7 was issued by the hotel’s property accessibility coordinator, validates a roll-in-shower feature, and was completed by the decision time. Every property-accessibility-coordinator roll-in-shower validation completed by then is recorded as CV-7.", "Room 318 has two queen beds and fulfills the quiet-location preference. The current register lists a tub and does not document a roll-in shower. The housekeeping supervisor nevertheless verbally claims that it has one."], "request": "Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims.", "timing": "All room observations and records below were checked at Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-097", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "0d82a6d8203d5a4979dbe77ba5afba2aabb74ec994a2ed22710bf83ce7628ec5", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "assign_214_and_route_exceptions"}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy and unchanged questions, request, guest, decision time, available-room set, and feature-assessment path. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual changes only the assignment-log room from 420 to 318; the dependent CV-7 sentence remains coherent because it refers to whichever room was the sole log entry. A coordinator validation concerning room 318 can coexist factually with a register that does not document its roll-in shower, even though the policy limits how that validation may be used in the decision. Neither context states the correct option, an answer code, a rule table, proposition IDs, label rationale, or an output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "refuted", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a12": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a12": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a12": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a12": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a12": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a12": "supported"}, "right": {"a12": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual relationship; the exact-set and universal atoms remain atomic despite quantification. The focus, whether CV-7 identifies room 420, is factual rather than policy. Base and counter assignments can both occur with only that identification relation changing and without violating the original policy. Policy evidence cites the original state and preserves the hard-feature scope, coordinator exception, housekeeping limitation, ranking priority, and relevant reservation requirements; rules already contained in the unchanged questions need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that CV-7 is a timely coordinator-issued roll-in-shower validation applying to room 420. The stated exception therefore resolves 420’s pending feature. With two beds and quiet status, 420 outranks verified but non-quiet 214; 318 remains conflicting because its register lacks a documented roll-in shower and housekeeping cannot override it.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction establishes that the sole timely coordinator roll-in-shower validation does not apply to room 420, so 420 remains pending. Room 214 has both hard requirements documented and must rank first; policy places pending 420 above conflicting 318, while the unresolved claims are routed as specified by the corresponding choice.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of rooms available for Mara Venn’s immediate assignment at Harbor Lantern Hotel consists exactly of rooms 214, 420, and 318."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 214 has two double beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The current accessibility register documents a roll-in shower for room 214 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Room 214 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Room 420 has two queen beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Room 420 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The current accessibility register marks room 420’s roll-in-shower status as pending post-renovation validation at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 was issued by the Harbor Lantern Hotel property accessibility coordinator."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 validates a roll-in-shower feature."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 was completed no later than Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Every property-accessibility-coordinator roll-in-shower validation completed no later than Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time is recorded as CV-7."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 identifies room 420 as the room to which its validation applies."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "Room 318 has two queen beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "Room 318 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The current accessibility register lists a tub for room 318 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The current accessibility register does not document a roll-in shower for room 318 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The housekeeping supervisor verbally claims at the immediate-assignment decision time that room 318 has a roll-in shower."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required.\",\"evidence\":[\"The immediate-assignment decision occurred at 14:15 on 12 June 2026; only rooms 214, 420, and 318 were available.\",\"At that time, room 214 had two double beds and a registered roll-in shower, but was street-facing and did not fulfill Mara Venn’s quiet preference.\",\"Room 420 had two queen beds, fulfilled the quiet preference, and had roll-in-shower status pending post-renovation validation in the current accessibility register.\",\"Room 318 had two queen beds and fulfilled the quiet preference; the register listed a tub and did not document a roll-in shower, although the housekeeping supervisor verbally claimed one.\",\"By the decision time, CV-7 had been issued by the property accessibility coordinator and completed as a roll-in-shower validation. Every such coordinator validation completed by then was recorded as CV-7.\",\"At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 420.\",\"At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day.\",\"Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a12", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 420."}, {"path": ["evidence", "6"], "text": "At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims."}], "rules": [{"justification": "CV-7 is a timely roll-in-shower validation issued by the authorized coordinator, and it applies to room 420. Thus the exception verifies 420’s pending shower feature. Room 420 has two queens and fulfills the quiet preference, so it ranks above verified but non-quiet room 214. Room 318 remains conflicting because its register does not document a roll-in shower and the housekeeping claim cannot override that record.", "target": "assign_420_as_best_fit", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "CV-7 is the sole timely coordinator roll-in-shower validation, but it does not apply to room 420. Therefore 420 remains pending. Room 214 has both hard requirements documented and ranks first; policy places pending room 420 above conflicting room 318. Room 420’s pending feature and room 318’s register-conflicting housekeeping claim require routing to the property accessibility coordinator.", "target": "assign_214_and_route_exceptions", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 420.", "negative_left": "At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 318.", "negative_right": "At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day.", "right": "At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-097-005", "id": "scale-diverse-097-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"assign_214_and_route_exceptions": "Assign 214; judge its two-bed and roll-in-shower requirements fulfilled and its quiet preference unfulfilled. Rank 214 > 420 > 318. Route 420’s pending feature and 318’s conflicting shower claim to the property accessibility coordinator.", "assign_318_on_housekeeping_authority": "Assign 318 based on the housekeeping supervisor’s statement; judge all requirements and the quiet preference fulfilled, rank 318 > 420 > 214, and route only 420 to the housekeeping supervisor.", "assign_420_as_best_fit": "Assign 420 because it is quiet and has two queens; judge both hard requirements fulfilled, rank 420 > 214 > 318, and do not seek coordinator review."}, "instructions": "Select exactly one option. Apply the documented-feature scope and its coordinator-validation exception before considering the quiet-room preference.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required.", "evidence": ["The immediate-assignment decision occurred at 14:15 on 12 June 2026; only rooms 214, 420, and 318 were available.", "At that time, room 214 had two double beds and a registered roll-in shower, but was street-facing and did not fulfill Mara Venn’s quiet preference.", "Room 420 had two queen beds, fulfilled the quiet preference, and had roll-in-shower status pending post-renovation validation in the current accessibility register.", "Room 318 had two queen beds and fulfilled the quiet preference; the register listed a tub and did not document a roll-in shower, although the housekeeping supervisor verbally claimed one.", "By the decision time, CV-7 had been issued by the property accessibility coordinator and completed as a roll-in-shower validation. Every such coordinator validation completed by then was recorded as CV-7.", "At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 420.", "At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day.", "Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms."], "request": "Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-097", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "0d82a6d8203d5a4979dbe77ba5afba2aabb74ec994a2ed22710bf83ce7628ec5", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "assign_420_as_best_fit"}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy and unchanged questions, request, guest, decision time, available-room set, and feature-assessment path. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual changes only the assignment-log room from 420 to 318; the dependent CV-7 sentence remains coherent because it refers to whichever room was the sole log entry. A coordinator validation concerning room 318 can coexist factually with a register that does not document its roll-in shower, even though the policy limits how that validation may be used in the decision. Neither context states the correct option, an answer code, a rule table, proposition IDs, label rationale, or an output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "refuted", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "refuted", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a12": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a12": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a12": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a12": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a12": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a12": "supported"}, "right": {"a12": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual relationship; the exact-set and universal atoms remain atomic despite quantification. The focus, whether CV-7 identifies room 420, is factual rather than policy. Base and counter assignments can both occur with only that identification relation changing and without violating the original policy. Policy evidence cites the original state and preserves the hard-feature scope, coordinator exception, housekeeping limitation, ranking priority, and relevant reservation requirements; rules already contained in the unchanged questions need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that CV-7 is a timely coordinator-issued roll-in-shower validation applying to room 420. The stated exception therefore resolves 420’s pending feature. With two beds and quiet status, 420 outranks verified but non-quiet 214; 318 remains conflicting because its register lacks a documented roll-in shower and housekeeping cannot override it.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction establishes that the sole timely coordinator roll-in-shower validation does not apply to room 420, so 420 remains pending. Room 214 has both hard requirements documented and must rank first; policy places pending 420 above conflicting 318, while the unresolved claims are routed as specified by the corresponding choice.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of rooms available for Mara Venn’s immediate assignment at Harbor Lantern Hotel consists exactly of rooms 214, 420, and 318."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 214 has two double beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The current accessibility register documents a roll-in shower for room 214 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Room 214 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Room 420 has two queen beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Room 420 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The current accessibility register marks room 420’s roll-in-shower status as pending post-renovation validation at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 was issued by the Harbor Lantern Hotel property accessibility coordinator."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 validates a roll-in-shower feature."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 was completed no later than Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Every property-accessibility-coordinator roll-in-shower validation completed no later than Mara Venn’s immediate-assignment decision time is recorded as CV-7."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Coordinator validation record CV-7 identifies room 420 as the room to which its validation applies."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "Room 318 has two queen beds at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "Room 318 fulfills Mara Venn’s quiet-location preference at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The current accessibility register lists a tub for room 318 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The current accessibility register does not document a roll-in shower for room 318 at the immediate-assignment decision time."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The housekeeping supervisor verbally claims at the immediate-assignment decision time that room 318 has a roll-in shower."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required.\",\"evidence\":[\"The immediate-assignment decision occurred at 14:15 on 12 June 2026; only rooms 214, 420, and 318 were available.\",\"At that time, room 214 had two double beds and a registered roll-in shower, but was street-facing and did not fulfill Mara Venn’s quiet preference.\",\"Room 420 had two queen beds, fulfilled the quiet preference, and had roll-in-shower status pending post-renovation validation in the current accessibility register.\",\"Room 318 had two queen beds and fulfilled the quiet preference; the register listed a tub and did not document a roll-in shower, although the housekeeping supervisor verbally claimed one.\",\"By the decision time, CV-7 had been issued by the property accessibility coordinator and completed as a roll-in-shower validation. Every such coordinator validation completed by then was recorded as CV-7.\",\"At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 420.\",\"At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day.\",\"Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a12", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 420."}, {"path": ["evidence", "6"], "text": "At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims."}], "rules": [{"justification": "CV-7 is a timely roll-in-shower validation issued by the authorized coordinator, and it applies to room 420. Thus the exception verifies 420’s pending shower feature. Room 420 has two queens and fulfills the quiet preference, so it ranks above verified but non-quiet room 214. Room 318 remains conflicting because its register does not document a roll-in shower and the housekeeping claim cannot override that record.", "target": "assign_420_as_best_fit", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "CV-7 is the sole timely coordinator roll-in-shower validation, but it does not apply to room 420. Therefore 420 remains pending. Room 214 has both hard requirements documented and ranks first; policy places pending room 420 above conflicting room 318. Room 420’s pending feature and room 318’s register-conflicting housekeeping claim require routing to the property accessibility coordinator.", "target": "assign_214_and_route_exceptions", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 420.", "negative_left": "At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 318.", "negative_right": "At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day.", "right": "At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-097-005", "id": "scale-diverse-097-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"assign_214_and_route_exceptions": "Assign 214; judge its two-bed and roll-in-shower requirements fulfilled and its quiet preference unfulfilled. Rank 214 > 420 > 318. Route 420’s pending feature and 318’s conflicting shower claim to the property accessibility coordinator.", "assign_318_on_housekeeping_authority": "Assign 318 based on the housekeeping supervisor’s statement; judge all requirements and the quiet preference fulfilled, rank 318 > 420 > 214, and route only 420 to the housekeeping supervisor.", "assign_420_as_best_fit": "Assign 420 because it is quiet and has two queens; judge both hard requirements fulfilled, rank 420 > 214 > 318, and do not seek coordinator review."}, "instructions": "Select exactly one option. Apply the documented-feature scope and its coordinator-validation exception before considering the quiet-room preference.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "At fictional Harbor Lantern Hotel, guest Mara Venn asks the front desk agent to assign a room meeting her reservation’s hard requirements: two separate beds and a roll-in shower. A quiet location is preferred, not required.", "evidence": ["The immediate-assignment decision occurred at 14:15 on 12 June 2026; only rooms 214, 420, and 318 were available.", "At that time, room 214 had two double beds and a registered roll-in shower, but was street-facing and did not fulfill Mara Venn’s quiet preference.", "Room 420 had two queen beds, fulfilled the quiet preference, and had roll-in-shower status pending post-renovation validation in the current accessibility register.", "Room 318 had two queen beds and fulfilled the quiet preference; the register listed a tub and did not document a roll-in shower, although the housekeeping supervisor verbally claimed one.", "By the decision time, CV-7 had been issued by the property accessibility coordinator and completed as a roll-in-shower validation. Every such coordinator validation completed by then was recorded as CV-7.", "At 14:05 on 12 June 2026, Harbor Lantern Hotel's assignment log HL-83 contained exactly one room entry for Mara Venn, and that entry was room 318.", "At 14:10 on 12 June 2026, coordinator validation record CV-7 identified exactly one room as the room to which its validation applied, namely the sole room entered for Mara Venn in assignment log HL-83 at 14:05 that day.", "Policy scope: for immediate assignment, all hard features must appear in the current register. Exception: the property accessibility coordinator may validate a pending feature; housekeeping claims cannot override the register. Rank verified hard requirements first, then preferences; place pending rooms above conflicting rooms."], "request": "Choose the correct assignment, yes/no fulfillment judgments, ranking of available rooms, and routing of unresolved feature claims."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-097", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "0d82a6d8203d5a4979dbe77ba5afba2aabb74ec994a2ed22710bf83ce7628ec5", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "assign_214_and_route_exceptions"}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy, booking decision scope, guest and room entities, and relevant dated inventory path. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes the documented roll-in status from “yes” to “no” without creating a duplicate contradictory measurement or conflicting with the unchanged no-dispute assertion. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. At 08:45 on 16 September 2026, the hotel finalized its released-room inventory, listing exactly Rooms 214 and 408. At 08:52, housekeeping marked Room 408 clean. At 09:00, Juniper Quay Hotel room records documented two beds in Room 408. At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408. At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “yes.” At 09:25, hotel records documented that Room 214 lacked a roll-in shower. At 09:30, the booking audit recorded that no accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking was disputed. The front desk then proposed assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “yes.”"}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408.", "negative_left": "At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408.", "negative_right": "At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “no.”", "right": "At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “yes.”"}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-099-001", "id": "scale-diverse-099-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. At 08:45 on 16 September 2026, the hotel finalized its released-room inventory, listing exactly Rooms 214 and 408. At 08:52, housekeeping marked Room 408 clean. At 09:00, Juniper Quay Hotel room records documented two beds in Room 408. At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408. At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “yes.” At 09:25, hotel records documented that Room 214 lacked a roll-in shower. At 09:30, the booking audit recorded that no accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking was disputed. The front desk then proposed assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy, booking decision scope, guest and room entities, and relevant dated inventory path. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes the documented roll-in status from “yes” to “no” without creating a duplicate contradictory measurement or conflicting with the unchanged no-dispute assertion. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. At 08:45 on 16 September 2026, the hotel finalized its released-room inventory, listing exactly Rooms 214 and 408. At 08:52, housekeeping marked Room 408 clean. At 09:00, Juniper Quay Hotel room records documented two beds in Room 408. At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408. At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “yes.” At 09:25, hotel records documented that Room 214 lacked a roll-in shower. At 09:30, the booking audit recorded that no accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking was disputed. The front desk then proposed assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “yes.”"}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408.", "negative_left": "At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408.", "negative_right": "At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “no.”", "right": "At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “yes.”"}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-099-001", "id": "scale-diverse-099-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. At 08:45 on 16 September 2026, the hotel finalized its released-room inventory, listing exactly Rooms 214 and 408. At 08:52, housekeeping marked Room 408 clean. At 09:00, Juniper Quay Hotel room records documented two beds in Room 408. At 09:12 on 16 September 2026, the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility inventory identified fixture QX-731 as the sole shower installed in Room 408. At 09:18 on 16 September 2026, the same inventory classified fixture QX-731 with roll-in status “no.” At 09:25, hotel records documented that Room 214 lacked a roll-in shower. At 09:30, the booking audit recorded that no accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking was disputed. The front desk then proposed assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy and continue to concern Mara Venn’s proposed assignment to Room 408 and its ranking over Room 214. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes Room 408’s sole fixture-status code from RS-17 to NS-42, which the unchanged legend defines as recording absence of a roll-in shower, without creating a duplicate or contradictory measurement. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. The released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Housekeeping marks Room 408 clean, and the hotel’s room records document two beds there. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists RS-17 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408. The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence. For Room 214, the hotel’s accessibility records document that a roll-in shower is absent. Staff found no disputed accessibility feature for any room considered for Mara’s booking. The front desk proposes assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists RS-17 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408."}, {"path": [], "text": "The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists RS-17 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408.", "negative_left": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists NS-42 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408.", "negative_right": "The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence.", "right": "The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-099-002", "id": "scale-diverse-099-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. The released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Housekeeping marks Room 408 clean, and the hotel’s room records document two beds there. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists RS-17 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408. The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence. For Room 214, the hotel’s accessibility records document that a roll-in shower is absent. Staff found no disputed accessibility feature for any room considered for Mara’s booking. The front desk proposes assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy and continue to concern Mara Venn’s proposed assignment to Room 408 and its ranking over Room 214. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes Room 408’s sole fixture-status code from RS-17 to NS-42, which the unchanged legend defines as recording absence of a roll-in shower, without creating a duplicate or contradictory measurement. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. The released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Housekeeping marks Room 408 clean, and the hotel’s room records document two beds there. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists RS-17 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408. The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence. For Room 214, the hotel’s accessibility records document that a roll-in shower is absent. Staff found no disputed accessibility feature for any room considered for Mara’s booking. The front desk proposes assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists RS-17 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408."}, {"path": [], "text": "The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists RS-17 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408.", "negative_left": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists NS-42 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408.", "negative_right": "The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence.", "right": "The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-099-002", "id": "scale-diverse-099-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. The released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Housekeeping marks Room 408 clean, and the hotel’s room records document two beds there. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 lists NS-42 as the sole fixture-status code for Room 408. The legend within the Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-record snapshot dated 14 August 2026 states that RS-17 records the presence of a roll-in shower and NS-42 records its absence. For Room 214, the hotel’s accessibility records document that a roll-in shower is absent. Staff found no disputed accessibility feature for any room considered for Mara’s booking. The front desk proposes assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original governing policy, booking decision scope, hotel, guest, room entities, and proposed assignment/ranking. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the contemporaneous meaning of QX-27, making Room 408’s sole bathing feature a non-roll-in shower; this remains coherent with the unchanged facts and creates no duplicate contradictory measurement or assertion. QX-27 is an in-world accessibility code rather than an answer code, and neither context states a gold label, output instruction, rule table, proposition ID, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a roll-in shower. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. The released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Housekeeping marks Room 408 clean. The hotel lodging record documents two beds in Room 408. Room 214’s accessibility record states that it lacks a roll-in shower. For Mara’s booking, staff considered those two rooms, and no accessibility feature of either room is disputed. The front desk proposes assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27."}, {"path": [], "text": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a roll-in shower."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27.", "negative_left": "At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27.", "negative_right": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a fixed-threshold shower with no roll-in shower.", "right": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a roll-in shower."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-099-003", "id": "scale-diverse-099-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a roll-in shower. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. The released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Housekeeping marks Room 408 clean. The hotel lodging record documents two beds in Room 408. Room 214’s accessibility record states that it lacks a roll-in shower. For Mara’s booking, staff considered those two rooms, and no accessibility feature of either room is disputed. The front desk proposes assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original governing policy, booking decision scope, hotel, guest, room entities, and proposed assignment/ranking. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the contemporaneous meaning of QX-27, making Room 408’s sole bathing feature a non-roll-in shower; this remains coherent with the unchanged facts and creates no duplicate contradictory measurement or assertion. QX-27 is an in-world accessibility code rather than an answer code, and neither context states a gold label, output instruction, rule table, proposition ID, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a roll-in shower. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. The released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Housekeeping marks Room 408 clean. The hotel lodging record documents two beds in Room 408. Room 214’s accessibility record states that it lacks a roll-in shower. For Mara’s booking, staff considered those two rooms, and no accessibility feature of either room is disputed. The front desk proposes assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27."}, {"path": [], "text": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a roll-in shower."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27.", "negative_left": "At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27.", "negative_right": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a fixed-threshold shower with no roll-in shower.", "right": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a roll-in shower."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-099-003", "id": "scale-diverse-099-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At the Juniper Quay Hotel operational handoff at 14:35 on 12 September 2026, the complete accessibility record for Room 408 contained a sole bathing-feature entry coded QX-27. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility-code legend in force at 14:35 on 12 September 2026 defined QX-27 as a fixed-threshold shower with no roll-in shower. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. The released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Housekeeping marks Room 408 clean. The hotel lodging record documents two beds in Room 408. Room 214’s accessibility record states that it lacks a roll-in shower. For Mara’s booking, staff considered those two rooms, and no accessibility feature of either room is disputed. The front desk proposes assigning Room 408 and ranking it above Room 214. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original decision rubric, routing policy, request scope, Mara/T-884 entities, and question structure. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the intake serial-patch value, creating a coherent material mismatch without contradicting the separate assertion that all details apart from the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons agree. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, proposition ID, label rationale, or classifier-output instruction beyond the governing rubric itself.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"questions\":{\"decision\":{\"criteria\":{\"deny_low\":\"Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.\",\"hold_medium\":\"Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.\",\"release_high\":\"Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict.\"},\"instructions\":\"Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.\",\"type\":\"choice\"}},\"state\":{\"context\":\"Earlier on 22 August 2026, backpack T-884 was found aboard Route 18 bus 604. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it and handed it directly to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it to custodian Arun Vale. The custody log accounts for the entire interval from sealing through Vale’s receipt, with no gap, and records that the seal remained unbroken. At intake, the serial-patch field was designated as the backpack’s unique identifier.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \\\"NV-4726-K\\\" for backpack T-884.\",\"At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \\\"NV-4726-K\\\".\",\"The intake record contained a hidden-feature detail that had not been publicly disclosed before Mara supplied it; her detail was identical to the recorded one.\",\"Apart from the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons, every material item, date, time, location, and identifier detail Mara supplied agrees with the intake record for T-884.\",\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["state", "evidence", "0"], "text": "At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\" for backpack T-884."}, {"path": ["state", "evidence", "1"], "text": "At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\"."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\" for backpack T-884.", "negative_left": "At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\" for backpack T-884.", "negative_right": "At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \"NV-4728-K\".", "right": "At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\"."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-169-001", "id": "scale-diverse-169-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Earlier on 22 August 2026, backpack T-884 was found aboard Route 18 bus 604. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it and handed it directly to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it to custodian Arun Vale. The custody log accounts for the entire interval from sealing through Vale’s receipt, with no gap, and records that the seal remained unbroken. At intake, the serial-patch field was designated as the backpack’s unique identifier.", "evidence": ["At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\" for backpack T-884.", "At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\".", "The intake record contained a hidden-feature detail that had not been publicly disclosed before Mara supplied it; her detail was identical to the recorded one.", "Apart from the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons, every material item, date, time, location, and identifier detail Mara supplied agrees with the intake record for T-884.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original decision rubric, routing policy, request scope, Mara/T-884 entities, and question structure. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the intake serial-patch value, creating a coherent material mismatch without contradicting the separate assertion that all details apart from the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons agree. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, proposition ID, label rationale, or classifier-output instruction beyond the governing rubric itself.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"questions\":{\"decision\":{\"criteria\":{\"deny_low\":\"Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.\",\"hold_medium\":\"Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.\",\"release_high\":\"Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict.\"},\"instructions\":\"Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.\",\"type\":\"choice\"}},\"state\":{\"context\":\"Earlier on 22 August 2026, backpack T-884 was found aboard Route 18 bus 604. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it and handed it directly to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it to custodian Arun Vale. The custody log accounts for the entire interval from sealing through Vale’s receipt, with no gap, and records that the seal remained unbroken. At intake, the serial-patch field was designated as the backpack’s unique identifier.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \\\"NV-4726-K\\\" for backpack T-884.\",\"At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \\\"NV-4726-K\\\".\",\"The intake record contained a hidden-feature detail that had not been publicly disclosed before Mara supplied it; her detail was identical to the recorded one.\",\"Apart from the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons, every material item, date, time, location, and identifier detail Mara supplied agrees with the intake record for T-884.\",\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["state", "evidence", "0"], "text": "At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\" for backpack T-884."}, {"path": ["state", "evidence", "1"], "text": "At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\"."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\" for backpack T-884.", "negative_left": "At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\" for backpack T-884.", "negative_right": "At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \"NV-4728-K\".", "right": "At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\"."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-169-001", "id": "scale-diverse-169-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Earlier on 22 August 2026, backpack T-884 was found aboard Route 18 bus 604. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it and handed it directly to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it to custodian Arun Vale. The custody log accounts for the entire interval from sealing through Vale’s receipt, with no gap, and records that the seal remained unbroken. At intake, the serial-patch field was designated as the backpack’s unique identifier.", "evidence": ["At 09:14 UTC on 22 August 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value \"NV-4726-K\" for backpack T-884.", "At 09:19 UTC on 22 August 2026, the intake record for backpack T-884 displayed the recorded serial-patch value \"NV-4728-K\".", "The intake record contained a hidden-feature detail that had not been publicly disclosed before Mara supplied it; her detail was identical to the recorded one.", "Apart from the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons, every material item, date, time, location, and identifier detail Mara supplied agrees with the intake record for T-884.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the transit-property routing policy and the unchanged request concerning Mara, backpack T-884, routing, and release confidence. The two designated focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the intake serial-patch value; it remains coherent because the reconciliation note expressly excludes the separately compared serial-patch entry from its general agreement assertion. Neither context includes a gold answer, output instruction, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Evidence reconciliation note: The backpack sealed as T-884 was recovered from Route 18 bus 604. Imani Cole sealed it, delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, and the receptionist transferred it directly to Arun Vale; the custody log shows no intervening gap, and Arun recorded the seal as unbroken on receipt. For T-884, the serial-patch field is designated as a unique backpack identifier. The intake record also contains a concealed-feature detail that Mara independently supplied exactly; that detail had not been publicly disclosed before her report. Apart from the separately compared serial-patch and concealed-feature entries, every material item, date, time, location, and identifier Mara supplied agrees with the intake record.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.\",\"The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.\",\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "negative_left": "At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "negative_right": "The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7391” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "right": "The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-169-002", "id": "scale-diverse-169-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Evidence reconciliation note: The backpack sealed as T-884 was recovered from Route 18 bus 604. Imani Cole sealed it, delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, and the receptionist transferred it directly to Arun Vale; the custody log shows no intervening gap, and Arun recorded the seal as unbroken on receipt. For T-884, the serial-patch field is designated as a unique backpack identifier. The intake record also contains a concealed-feature detail that Mara independently supplied exactly; that detail had not been publicly disclosed before her report. Apart from the separately compared serial-patch and concealed-feature entries, every material item, date, time, location, and identifier Mara supplied agrees with the intake record.", "evidence": ["At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the transit-property routing policy and the unchanged request concerning Mara, backpack T-884, routing, and release confidence. The two designated focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the intake serial-patch value; it remains coherent because the reconciliation note expressly excludes the separately compared serial-patch entry from its general agreement assertion. Neither context includes a gold answer, output instruction, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Evidence reconciliation note: The backpack sealed as T-884 was recovered from Route 18 bus 604. Imani Cole sealed it, delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, and the receptionist transferred it directly to Arun Vale; the custody log shows no intervening gap, and Arun recorded the seal as unbroken on receipt. For T-884, the serial-patch field is designated as a unique backpack identifier. The intake record also contains a concealed-feature detail that Mara independently supplied exactly; that detail had not been publicly disclosed before her report. Apart from the separately compared serial-patch and concealed-feature entries, every material item, date, time, location, and identifier Mara supplied agrees with the intake record.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.\",\"The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.\",\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "negative_left": "At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "negative_right": "The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7391” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "right": "The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-169-002", "id": "scale-diverse-169-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Evidence reconciliation note: The backpack sealed as T-884 was recovered from Route 18 bus 604. Imani Cole sealed it, delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, and the receptionist transferred it directly to Arun Vale; the custody log shows no intervening gap, and Arun recorded the seal as unbroken on receipt. For T-884, the serial-patch field is designated as a unique backpack identifier. The intake record also contains a concealed-feature detail that Mara independently supplied exactly; that detail had not been publicly disclosed before her report. Apart from the separately compared serial-patch and concealed-feature entries, every material item, date, time, location, and identifier Mara supplied agrees with the intake record.", "evidence": ["At 14:22 UTC on 6 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied “QX-7314” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "The intake record finalized at 09:08 UTC on 6 May 2026 records “QX-7391” as the serial-patch value for backpack T-884.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full confidence rubric, and the transit-routing policy from the original state is retained verbatim in both contexts. The request remains bound to Mara, backpack T-884, the proper route, and release confidence; the two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the intake-record serial value, creating a material mismatch rather than a contradictory duplicate, and the statement that all other details agree expressly excludes that comparison. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Field note: Transit records show that backpack T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604. Imani Cole sealed it and personally delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, whose log records an immediate transfer to Arun Vale. The custody ledger has no missing interval between sealing and Arun’s receipt, and Arun accepted the same seal unbroken.\",\"evidence\":[\"The serial patch is assigned only to backpack T-884 and is its unique identifier.\",\"At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884.\",\"The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7314.\",\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\",\"Before Mara’s interview, the hidden-feature entry in the intake record had not been publicly disclosed; during the interview, she supplied a detail identical to that entry.\",\"Comparison with the intake record confirms that every other material item, date, time, location, and identifier detail Mara supplied agrees with it, excluding the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7314."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884.", "negative_left": "At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884.", "negative_right": "The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7391.", "right": "The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7314."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-169-004", "id": "scale-diverse-169-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Field note: Transit records show that backpack T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604. Imani Cole sealed it and personally delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, whose log records an immediate transfer to Arun Vale. The custody ledger has no missing interval between sealing and Arun’s receipt, and Arun accepted the same seal unbroken.", "evidence": ["The serial patch is assigned only to backpack T-884 and is its unique identifier.", "At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884.", "The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7314.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.", "Before Mara’s interview, the hidden-feature entry in the intake record had not been publicly disclosed; during the interview, she supplied a detail identical to that entry.", "Comparison with the intake record confirms that every other material item, date, time, location, and identifier detail Mara supplied agrees with it, excluding the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full confidence rubric, and the transit-routing policy from the original state is retained verbatim in both contexts. The request remains bound to Mara, backpack T-884, the proper route, and release confidence; the two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the intake-record serial value, creating a material mismatch rather than a contradictory duplicate, and the statement that all other details agree expressly excludes that comparison. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Field note: Transit records show that backpack T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604. Imani Cole sealed it and personally delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, whose log records an immediate transfer to Arun Vale. The custody ledger has no missing interval between sealing and Arun’s receipt, and Arun accepted the same seal unbroken.\",\"evidence\":[\"The serial patch is assigned only to backpack T-884 and is its unique identifier.\",\"At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884.\",\"The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7314.\",\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\",\"Before Mara’s interview, the hidden-feature entry in the intake record had not been publicly disclosed; during the interview, she supplied a detail identical to that entry.\",\"Comparison with the intake record confirms that every other material item, date, time, location, and identifier detail Mara supplied agrees with it, excluding the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7314."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884.", "negative_left": "At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884.", "negative_right": "The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7391.", "right": "The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7314."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-169-004", "id": "scale-diverse-169-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Field note: Transit records show that backpack T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604. Imani Cole sealed it and personally delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, whose log records an immediate transfer to Arun Vale. The custody ledger has no missing interval between sealing and Arun’s receipt, and Arun accepted the same seal unbroken.", "evidence": ["The serial patch is assigned only to backpack T-884 and is its unique identifier.", "At 14:20 on 8 May 2026, Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value QX-7314 for backpack T-884.", "The 8 May 2026 intake record for backpack T-884 lists its serial-patch value as QX-7391.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.", "Before Mara’s interview, the hidden-feature entry in the intake record had not been publicly disclosed; during the interview, she supplied a detail identical to that entry.", "Comparison with the intake record confirms that every other material item, date, time, location, and identifier detail Mara supplied agrees with it, excluding the serial-patch and hidden-feature comparisons."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original matching scale and High-confidence release requirement, and they retain the decision about whether the custodian should release the phone to Ivo. The focus evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the receipt’s serial identifier, creating a coherent conflict with the custodian-recorded identifier rather than a contradictory duplicate measurement. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, proposition ID, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Mara reported that the item she handed to transit staff was a black Solis A5 phone recovered from bus 42 on 14 September 2026. At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day. Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt. When filing his claim, Ivo described his missing item as a black Solis A5 phone and said he had lost it on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. The custodian retained Mara's intake record, Ivo's claim, and the original receipt for review. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day.", "negative_left": "At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4892-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-171-001", "id": "scale-diverse-171-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Mara reported that the item she handed to transit staff was a black Solis A5 phone recovered from bus 42 on 14 September 2026. At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day. Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt. When filing his claim, Ivo described his missing item as a black Solis A5 phone and said he had lost it on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. The custodian retained Mara's intake record, Ivo's claim, and the original receipt for review. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original matching scale and High-confidence release requirement, and they retain the decision about whether the custodian should release the phone to Ivo. The focus evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the receipt’s serial identifier, creating a coherent conflict with the custodian-recorded identifier rather than a contradictory duplicate measurement. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, proposition ID, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Mara reported that the item she handed to transit staff was a black Solis A5 phone recovered from bus 42 on 14 September 2026. At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day. Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt. When filing his claim, Ivo described his missing item as a black Solis A5 phone and said he had lost it on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. The custodian retained Mara's intake record, Ivo's claim, and the original receipt for review. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day.", "negative_left": "At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4892-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-171-001", "id": "scale-diverse-171-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Mara reported that the item she handed to transit staff was a black Solis A5 phone recovered from bus 42 on 14 September 2026. At 18:20 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded serial identifier QN7-4826-LP for the phone Mara had found on bus 42 that day. Ivo's purchase receipt, issued at 10:15 on 3 August 2026, lists serial identifier QN7-4892-LP for the phone purchased on that receipt. When filing his claim, Ivo described his missing item as a black Solis A5 phone and said he had lost it on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. The custodian retained Mara's intake record, Ivo's claim, and the original receipt for review. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original matching scale and High-confidence release requirement without adding exceptions or defaults. They preserve the decision about whether the lost-property custodian should release the phone to Ivo, along with the bus 42 and 14 September 2026 bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the recovered phone’s serial identifier, creating a coherent conflict with Ivo’s receipt without duplicating or contradicting another recovered-item serial assertion. Neither context embeds an answer, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, rule table, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"During evidence reconciliation, Mara’s signed recovery report described the recovered item as a blue Orin QN7 phone found on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. Ivo’s signed claim described his missing item as a blue Orin QN7 phone lost on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. The custodian compared the contemporaneous recovery record with Ivo’s original purchase documentation. Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP. At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4186-ZP. Both records were available for the custodian’s review. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4186-ZP."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP.", "negative_left": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP.", "negative_right": "At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4198-ZP.", "right": "At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4186-ZP."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-171-002", "id": "scale-diverse-171-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "During evidence reconciliation, Mara’s signed recovery report described the recovered item as a blue Orin QN7 phone found on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. Ivo’s signed claim described his missing item as a blue Orin QN7 phone lost on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. The custodian compared the contemporaneous recovery record with Ivo’s original purchase documentation. Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP. At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4186-ZP. Both records were available for the custodian’s review. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original matching scale and High-confidence release requirement without adding exceptions or defaults. They preserve the decision about whether the lost-property custodian should release the phone to Ivo, along with the bus 42 and 14 September 2026 bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the recovered phone’s serial identifier, creating a coherent conflict with Ivo’s receipt without duplicating or contradicting another recovered-item serial assertion. Neither context embeds an answer, answer code, proposition identifier, label rationale, rule table, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"During evidence reconciliation, Mara’s signed recovery report described the recovered item as a blue Orin QN7 phone found on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. Ivo’s signed claim described his missing item as a blue Orin QN7 phone lost on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. The custodian compared the contemporaneous recovery record with Ivo’s original purchase documentation. Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP. At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4186-ZP. Both records were available for the custodian’s review. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4186-ZP."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP.", "negative_left": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP.", "negative_right": "At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4198-ZP.", "right": "At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4186-ZP."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-171-002", "id": "scale-diverse-171-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "During evidence reconciliation, Mara’s signed recovery report described the recovered item as a blue Orin QN7 phone found on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. Ivo’s signed claim described his missing item as a blue Orin QN7 phone lost on bus 42 on 14 September 2026. The custodian compared the contemporaneous recovery record with Ivo’s original purchase documentation. Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the purchased phone's exact serial identifier as QN7-4186-ZP. At 18:10 on 14 September 2026, the lost-property custodian recorded the exact serial identifier of the phone Mara found on bus 42 that day as QN7-4198-ZP. Both records were available for the custodian’s review. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the controlling conditional-intent framework without adding exceptions, priorities, or missing-evidence defaults, and they preserve the decision scope around claimant intent and sealed item T-884 on 16 September 2026. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The sole counterfactual change—from a blue to a red zipper-repair thread measurement at 09:40 UTC—is coherent with the unchanged records and creates no duplicate contradictory measurement. Neither context contains a gold answer, output instruction, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"F": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"F": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"F": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"F": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"F": "supported"}, "right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The focus atom F states a factual comparison between the inspected thread color and the claimant’s specified color, not a policy classification. The atoms each express a single factual status or relationship; broad match and no-other-contradiction atoms remain single bounded relations. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only the inspected thread comparison changing: in the base the repair is non-red, and in the counter it is red, while the report, custody, identifier, intent, and verification facts remain fixed. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing release policy is entirely contained in the automatically retained questions object; the original state adds case observations but no additional substantive policy rule needed to interpret the question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "F supported entails that the inspected repair thread is not red, so the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition is false. The policy makes a false explicit intent condition independently sufficient for No release, regardless of other matches.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "F refuted establishes that the thread does not differ from the required red thread; A2 makes this the only explicit condition, while A1 establishes active intent. A3–A6 establish a custody-record match with a matching, distinguishing, nonpublic identifier. A7 establishes an incomplete required verification step, excluding Release authorized, and A8 excludes another observed contradiction. These conditions are sufficient for Hold—strong match.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The claimant’s intent to claim sealed item T-884 is active."}, {"id": "F", "statement": "The inspected zipper-repair thread color on sealed item T-884 differs from the red thread specified by the claimant as a condition of claiming that same item."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The red-thread condition is the claimant’s only explicit condition on claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The description in the claimant’s 16 September report matches sealed item T-884 in the custody record."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap of sealed item T-884 match the initials and location stated by the claimant."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap are a distinguishing identifier of sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap were not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported them."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "At least one required verification step for sealed item T-884 remains incomplete."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "No observed detail of sealed item T-884 other than the zipper-thread comparison represented by F contradicts the claimant’s description."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Custody log\",\"text\":\"On 15 September 2026, sealed item T-884 entered North Depot custody. The claimant’s 16 September report matches the item documented in that custody record.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Claim record\",\"text\":\"At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Claims officer\",\"text\":\"The claimant’s intent to claim T-884 remains active, and the recorded thread requirement is the claimant’s only explicit condition.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Inspection record\",\"text\":\"At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded blue as its zipper-repair thread color.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verification note\",\"text\":\"Initials LM were found under the flap, matching the initials and location in the claimant’s report. This is a distinguishing identifier of T-884 and was not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported it. Apart from the zipper-thread comparison established by the two timed records, no observed detail contradicts the claimant’s description. A required verification call remains incomplete.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "F", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded blue as its zipper-repair thread color."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "A supported mismatch makes the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition false, which is independently sufficient for No release regardless of descriptive matches.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The sole explicit condition is not false, intent is active, the report matches the custody record, a matching identifier is both distinguishing and nonpublic, no other observed contradiction exists, and a required verification step remains; these facts are sufficient for Hold—strong match and exclude both No release and Release authorized.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884.", "negative_right": "At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded red as its zipper-repair thread color.", "right": "At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded blue as its zipper-repair thread color."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-173-001", "id": "scale-diverse-173-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["No release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.", "Hold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.", "Hold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.", "Release authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction."], "instructions": "Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Custody log", "text": "On 15 September 2026, sealed item T-884 entered North Depot custody. The claimant’s 16 September report matches the item documented in that custody record."}, {"speaker": "Claim record", "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"speaker": "Claims officer", "text": "The claimant’s intent to claim T-884 remains active, and the recorded thread requirement is the claimant’s only explicit condition."}, {"speaker": "Inspection record", "text": "At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded blue as its zipper-repair thread color."}, {"speaker": "Verification note", "text": "Initials LM were found under the flap, matching the initials and location in the claimant’s report. This is a distinguishing identifier of T-884 and was not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported it. Apart from the zipper-thread comparison established by the two timed records, no observed detail contradicts the claimant’s description. A required verification call remains incomplete."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-173", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6d42f938924ac710e25e811643a9c9487d64ece1c2ced6c495d87cdfa22a9eac", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the controlling conditional-intent framework without adding exceptions, priorities, or missing-evidence defaults, and they preserve the decision scope around claimant intent and sealed item T-884 on 16 September 2026. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The sole counterfactual change—from a blue to a red zipper-repair thread measurement at 09:40 UTC—is coherent with the unchanged records and creates no duplicate contradictory measurement. Neither context contains a gold answer, output instruction, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"F": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"F": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"F": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"F": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"F": "supported"}, "right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The focus atom F states a factual comparison between the inspected thread color and the claimant’s specified color, not a policy classification. The atoms each express a single factual status or relationship; broad match and no-other-contradiction atoms remain single bounded relations. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only the inspected thread comparison changing: in the base the repair is non-red, and in the counter it is red, while the report, custody, identifier, intent, and verification facts remain fixed. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing release policy is entirely contained in the automatically retained questions object; the original state adds case observations but no additional substantive policy rule needed to interpret the question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "F supported entails that the inspected repair thread is not red, so the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition is false. The policy makes a false explicit intent condition independently sufficient for No release, regardless of other matches.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "F refuted establishes that the thread does not differ from the required red thread; A2 makes this the only explicit condition, while A1 establishes active intent. A3–A6 establish a custody-record match with a matching, distinguishing, nonpublic identifier. A7 establishes an incomplete required verification step, excluding Release authorized, and A8 excludes another observed contradiction. These conditions are sufficient for Hold—strong match.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The claimant’s intent to claim sealed item T-884 is active."}, {"id": "F", "statement": "The inspected zipper-repair thread color on sealed item T-884 differs from the red thread specified by the claimant as a condition of claiming that same item."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The red-thread condition is the claimant’s only explicit condition on claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The description in the claimant’s 16 September report matches sealed item T-884 in the custody record."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap of sealed item T-884 match the initials and location stated by the claimant."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap are a distinguishing identifier of sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap were not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported them."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "At least one required verification step for sealed item T-884 remains incomplete."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "No observed detail of sealed item T-884 other than the zipper-thread comparison represented by F contradicts the claimant’s description."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Custody log\",\"text\":\"On 15 September 2026, sealed item T-884 entered North Depot custody. The claimant’s 16 September report matches the item documented in that custody record.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Claim record\",\"text\":\"At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Claims officer\",\"text\":\"The claimant’s intent to claim T-884 remains active, and the recorded thread requirement is the claimant’s only explicit condition.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Inspection record\",\"text\":\"At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded blue as its zipper-repair thread color.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verification note\",\"text\":\"Initials LM were found under the flap, matching the initials and location in the claimant’s report. This is a distinguishing identifier of T-884 and was not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported it. Apart from the zipper-thread comparison established by the two timed records, no observed detail contradicts the claimant’s description. A required verification call remains incomplete.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "F", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded blue as its zipper-repair thread color."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "A supported mismatch makes the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition false, which is independently sufficient for No release regardless of descriptive matches.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The sole explicit condition is not false, intent is active, the report matches the custody record, a matching identifier is both distinguishing and nonpublic, no other observed contradiction exists, and a required verification step remains; these facts are sufficient for Hold—strong match and exclude both No release and Release authorized.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884.", "negative_right": "At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded red as its zipper-repair thread color.", "right": "At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded blue as its zipper-repair thread color."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-173-001", "id": "scale-diverse-173-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["No release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.", "Hold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.", "Hold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.", "Release authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction."], "instructions": "Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Custody log", "text": "On 15 September 2026, sealed item T-884 entered North Depot custody. The claimant’s 16 September report matches the item documented in that custody record."}, {"speaker": "Claim record", "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the claimant recorded red as the required zipper-repair thread color for claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"speaker": "Claims officer", "text": "The claimant’s intent to claim T-884 remains active, and the recorded thread requirement is the claimant’s only explicit condition."}, {"speaker": "Inspection record", "text": "At 09:40 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded red as its zipper-repair thread color."}, {"speaker": "Verification note", "text": "Initials LM were found under the flap, matching the initials and location in the claimant’s report. This is a distinguishing identifier of T-884 and was not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported it. Apart from the zipper-thread comparison established by the two timed records, no observed detail contradicts the claimant’s description. A required verification call remains incomplete."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-173", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6d42f938924ac710e25e811643a9c9487d64ece1c2ced6c495d87cdfa22a9eac", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the release-readiness policy and the decision’s binding to claimant intent, sealed item T-884, and the relevant claim/inspection timeline. The focus evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the inspection result from blue thread to red thread, without conflicting with any unchanged assertion. Neither context supplies a decision label, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit gold-answer rationale; terms such as “distinguishing identifier” and “required” verification are permissible natural policy terminology.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"F": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"F": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"F": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"F": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"F": "supported"}, "right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The focus atom F states a factual comparison between the inspected thread color and the claimant’s specified color, not a policy classification. The atoms each express a single factual status or relationship; broad match and no-other-contradiction atoms remain single bounded relations. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only the inspected thread comparison changing: in the base the repair is non-red, and in the counter it is red, while the report, custody, identifier, intent, and verification facts remain fixed. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing release policy is entirely contained in the automatically retained questions object; the original state adds case observations but no additional substantive policy rule needed to interpret the question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "F supported entails that the inspected repair thread is not red, so the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition is false. The policy makes a false explicit intent condition independently sufficient for No release, regardless of other matches.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "F refuted establishes that the thread does not differ from the required red thread; A2 makes this the only explicit condition, while A1 establishes active intent. A3–A6 establish a custody-record match with a matching, distinguishing, nonpublic identifier. A7 establishes an incomplete required verification step, excluding Release authorized, and A8 excludes another observed contradiction. These conditions are sufficient for Hold—strong match.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The claimant’s intent to claim sealed item T-884 is active."}, {"id": "F", "statement": "The inspected zipper-repair thread color on sealed item T-884 differs from the red thread specified by the claimant as a condition of claiming that same item."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The red-thread condition is the claimant’s only explicit condition on claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The description in the claimant’s 16 September report matches sealed item T-884 in the custody record."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap of sealed item T-884 match the initials and location stated by the claimant."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap are a distinguishing identifier of sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap were not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported them."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "At least one required verification step for sealed item T-884 remains incomplete."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "No observed detail of sealed item T-884 other than the zipper-thread comparison represented by F contradicts the claimant’s description."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Claim record\",\"text\":\"In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Inspection record\",\"text\":\"At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as blue.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Intake reviewer\",\"text\":\"The claim remains active and has not been withdrawn. Review of the signed statement confirms that it contains only one explicit condition for claiming T-884.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Records reconciler\",\"text\":\"The claimant’s 16 September report describes the same navy canvas tool roll, six carving tools, repaired zipper, and custody-compatible recovery details recorded for sealed item T-884.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Identifier reviewer\",\"text\":\"The initials LM appear under T-884’s flap, exactly as the claimant reported. That placement is a distinguishing identifier, and neither the initials nor their location had been publicly disclosed before the report.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verification lead\",\"text\":\"The custody record remains intact, but the required seal-integrity cross-check is still incomplete. Apart from the zipper-thread comparison documented in the inspection, no observed detail of T-884 contradicts the claimant’s description.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "F", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as blue."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "A supported mismatch makes the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition false, which is independently sufficient for No release regardless of descriptive matches.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The sole explicit condition is not false, intent is active, the report matches the custody record, a matching identifier is both distinguishing and nonpublic, no other observed contradiction exists, and a required verification step remains; these facts are sufficient for Hold—strong match and exclude both No release and Release authorized.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread.", "negative_left": "In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread.", "negative_right": "At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as red.", "right": "At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as blue."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-173-002", "id": "scale-diverse-173-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["No release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.", "Hold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.", "Hold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.", "Release authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction."], "instructions": "Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Claim record", "text": "In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread."}, {"speaker": "Inspection record", "text": "At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as blue."}, {"speaker": "Intake reviewer", "text": "The claim remains active and has not been withdrawn. Review of the signed statement confirms that it contains only one explicit condition for claiming T-884."}, {"speaker": "Records reconciler", "text": "The claimant’s 16 September report describes the same navy canvas tool roll, six carving tools, repaired zipper, and custody-compatible recovery details recorded for sealed item T-884."}, {"speaker": "Identifier reviewer", "text": "The initials LM appear under T-884’s flap, exactly as the claimant reported. That placement is a distinguishing identifier, and neither the initials nor their location had been publicly disclosed before the report."}, {"speaker": "Verification lead", "text": "The custody record remains intact, but the required seal-integrity cross-check is still incomplete. Apart from the zipper-thread comparison documented in the inspection, no observed detail of T-884 contradicts the claimant’s description."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-173", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6d42f938924ac710e25e811643a9c9487d64ece1c2ced6c495d87cdfa22a9eac", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the release-readiness policy and the decision’s binding to claimant intent, sealed item T-884, and the relevant claim/inspection timeline. The focus evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the inspection result from blue thread to red thread, without conflicting with any unchanged assertion. Neither context supplies a decision label, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit gold-answer rationale; terms such as “distinguishing identifier” and “required” verification are permissible natural policy terminology.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"F": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"F": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"F": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"F": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"F": "supported"}, "right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The focus atom F states a factual comparison between the inspected thread color and the claimant’s specified color, not a policy classification. The atoms each express a single factual status or relationship; broad match and no-other-contradiction atoms remain single bounded relations. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only the inspected thread comparison changing: in the base the repair is non-red, and in the counter it is red, while the report, custody, identifier, intent, and verification facts remain fixed. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing release policy is entirely contained in the automatically retained questions object; the original state adds case observations but no additional substantive policy rule needed to interpret the question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "F supported entails that the inspected repair thread is not red, so the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition is false. The policy makes a false explicit intent condition independently sufficient for No release, regardless of other matches.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "F refuted establishes that the thread does not differ from the required red thread; A2 makes this the only explicit condition, while A1 establishes active intent. A3–A6 establish a custody-record match with a matching, distinguishing, nonpublic identifier. A7 establishes an incomplete required verification step, excluding Release authorized, and A8 excludes another observed contradiction. These conditions are sufficient for Hold—strong match.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The claimant’s intent to claim sealed item T-884 is active."}, {"id": "F", "statement": "The inspected zipper-repair thread color on sealed item T-884 differs from the red thread specified by the claimant as a condition of claiming that same item."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The red-thread condition is the claimant’s only explicit condition on claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The description in the claimant’s 16 September report matches sealed item T-884 in the custody record."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap of sealed item T-884 match the initials and location stated by the claimant."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap are a distinguishing identifier of sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap were not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported them."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "At least one required verification step for sealed item T-884 remains incomplete."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "No observed detail of sealed item T-884 other than the zipper-thread comparison represented by F contradicts the claimant’s description."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Claim record\",\"text\":\"In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Inspection record\",\"text\":\"At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as blue.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Intake reviewer\",\"text\":\"The claim remains active and has not been withdrawn. Review of the signed statement confirms that it contains only one explicit condition for claiming T-884.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Records reconciler\",\"text\":\"The claimant’s 16 September report describes the same navy canvas tool roll, six carving tools, repaired zipper, and custody-compatible recovery details recorded for sealed item T-884.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Identifier reviewer\",\"text\":\"The initials LM appear under T-884’s flap, exactly as the claimant reported. That placement is a distinguishing identifier, and neither the initials nor their location had been publicly disclosed before the report.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verification lead\",\"text\":\"The custody record remains intact, but the required seal-integrity cross-check is still incomplete. Apart from the zipper-thread comparison documented in the inspection, no observed detail of T-884 contradicts the claimant’s description.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "F", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as blue."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "A supported mismatch makes the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition false, which is independently sufficient for No release regardless of descriptive matches.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The sole explicit condition is not false, intent is active, the report matches the custody record, a matching identifier is both distinguishing and nonpublic, no other observed contradiction exists, and a required verification step remains; these facts are sufficient for Hold—strong match and exclude both No release and Release authorized.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread.", "negative_left": "In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread.", "negative_right": "At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as red.", "right": "At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as blue."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-173-002", "id": "scale-diverse-173-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["No release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.", "Hold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.", "Hold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.", "Release authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction."], "instructions": "Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Claim record", "text": "In the claimant's signed 16 September 2026 claim statement, the claimant made claiming sealed item T-884 conditional on the zipper repair having red thread."}, {"speaker": "Inspection record", "text": "At 14:32 UTC on 17 September 2026, an inspection of sealed item T-884 recorded the zipper-repair thread color as red."}, {"speaker": "Intake reviewer", "text": "The claim remains active and has not been withdrawn. Review of the signed statement confirms that it contains only one explicit condition for claiming T-884."}, {"speaker": "Records reconciler", "text": "The claimant’s 16 September report describes the same navy canvas tool roll, six carving tools, repaired zipper, and custody-compatible recovery details recorded for sealed item T-884."}, {"speaker": "Identifier reviewer", "text": "The initials LM appear under T-884’s flap, exactly as the claimant reported. That placement is a distinguishing identifier, and neither the initials nor their location had been publicly disclosed before the report."}, {"speaker": "Verification lead", "text": "The custody record remains intact, but the required seal-integrity cross-check is still incomplete. Apart from the zipper-thread comparison documented in the inspection, no observed detail of T-884 contradicts the claimant’s description."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-173", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6d42f938924ac710e25e811643a9c9487d64ece1c2ced6c495d87cdfa22a9eac", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both full contexts preserve the unchanged release-readiness policy and remain bound to the claim for sealed item T-884 and the relevant September 2026 custody timeline. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes the inspected stitch color from blue to red without creating a duplicate or contradictory measurement, and it remains coherent with the statement that no other observed detail conflicts and that seal-number verification is incomplete. Neither context embeds a gold answer, output instruction, answer code, proposition ID, rule table, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"F": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"F": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"F": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"F": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"F": "supported"}, "right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The focus atom F states a factual comparison between the inspected thread color and the claimant’s specified color, not a policy classification. The atoms each express a single factual status or relationship; broad match and no-other-contradiction atoms remain single bounded relations. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only the inspected thread comparison changing: in the base the repair is non-red, and in the counter it is red, while the report, custody, identifier, intent, and verification facts remain fixed. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing release policy is entirely contained in the automatically retained questions object; the original state adds case observations but no additional substantive policy rule needed to interpret the question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "F supported entails that the inspected repair thread is not red, so the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition is false. The policy makes a false explicit intent condition independently sufficient for No release, regardless of other matches.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "F refuted establishes that the thread does not differ from the required red thread; A2 makes this the only explicit condition, while A1 establishes active intent. A3–A6 establish a custody-record match with a matching, distinguishing, nonpublic identifier. A7 establishes an incomplete required verification step, excluding Release authorized, and A8 excludes another observed contradiction. These conditions are sufficient for Hold—strong match.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The claimant’s intent to claim sealed item T-884 is active."}, {"id": "F", "statement": "The inspected zipper-repair thread color on sealed item T-884 differs from the red thread specified by the claimant as a condition of claiming that same item."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The red-thread condition is the claimant’s only explicit condition on claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The description in the claimant’s 16 September report matches sealed item T-884 in the custody record."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap of sealed item T-884 match the initials and location stated by the claimant."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap are a distinguishing identifier of sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap were not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported them."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "At least one required verification step for sealed item T-884 remains incomplete."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "No observed detail of sealed item T-884 other than the zipper-thread comparison represented by F contradicts the claimant’s description."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Release policy\",\"text\":\"Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.\\nNo release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.\\nHold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.\\nHold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.\\nRelease authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Field officer\",\"text\":\"The claim for sealed item T-884 remains active, and the signed claim form contains no other explicit condition. The claimant’s 16 September report matches the custody record’s navy canvas tool roll, six carving tools, repaired zipper, recovery from bus 418 after the 15 September final run, and North Depot storage.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Evidence registrar\",\"text\":\"The report places initials LM under the flap, matching inspection. The registry classifies those initials in that location as a distinguishing identifier, and disclosure logs confirm they were not public before the report.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Custody analyst\",\"text\":\"At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Inspection officer\",\"text\":\"At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as blue, which the calibrated colorimeter distinguishes from red.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verification officer\",\"text\":\"Apart from the comparison documented above, no observed detail conflicts with the claimant’s description. The required independent seal-number verification remains incomplete.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "F", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47."}, {"path": ["4", "text"], "text": "At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as blue, which the calibrated colorimeter distinguishes from red."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "A supported mismatch makes the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition false, which is independently sufficient for No release regardless of descriptive matches.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The sole explicit condition is not false, intent is active, the report matches the custody record, a matching identifier is both distinguishing and nonpublic, no other observed contradiction exists, and a required verification step remains; these facts are sufficient for Hold—strong match and exclude both No release and Release authorized.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47.", "negative_right": "At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as red, which the calibrated colorimeter classifies as the same color as red.", "right": "At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as blue, which the calibrated colorimeter distinguishes from red."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-173-004", "id": "scale-diverse-173-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["No release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.", "Hold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.", "Hold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.", "Release authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction."], "instructions": "Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Release policy", "text": "Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.\nNo release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.\nHold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.\nHold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.\nRelease authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction."}, {"speaker": "Field officer", "text": "The claim for sealed item T-884 remains active, and the signed claim form contains no other explicit condition. The claimant’s 16 September report matches the custody record’s navy canvas tool roll, six carving tools, repaired zipper, recovery from bus 418 after the 15 September final run, and North Depot storage."}, {"speaker": "Evidence registrar", "text": "The report places initials LM under the flap, matching inspection. The registry classifies those initials in that location as a distinguishing identifier, and disclosure logs confirm they were not public before the report."}, {"speaker": "Custody analyst", "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47."}, {"speaker": "Inspection officer", "text": "At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as blue, which the calibrated colorimeter distinguishes from red."}, {"speaker": "Verification officer", "text": "Apart from the comparison documented above, no observed detail conflicts with the claimant’s description. The required independent seal-number verification remains incomplete."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-173", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6d42f938924ac710e25e811643a9c9487d64ece1c2ced6c495d87cdfa22a9eac", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both full contexts preserve the unchanged release-readiness policy and remain bound to the claim for sealed item T-884 and the relevant September 2026 custody timeline. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes the inspected stitch color from blue to red without creating a duplicate or contradictory measurement, and it remains coherent with the statement that no other observed detail conflicts and that seal-number verification is incomplete. Neither context embeds a gold answer, output instruction, answer code, proposition ID, rule table, or label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "F": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"F": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"F": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"F": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"F": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"F": "supported"}, "right": {"F": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The focus atom F states a factual comparison between the inspected thread color and the claimant’s specified color, not a policy classification. The atoms each express a single factual status or relationship; broad match and no-other-contradiction atoms remain single bounded relations. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only the inspected thread comparison changing: in the base the repair is non-red, and in the counter it is red, while the report, custody, identifier, intent, and verification facts remain fixed. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing release policy is entirely contained in the automatically retained questions object; the original state adds case observations but no additional substantive policy rule needed to interpret the question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "F supported entails that the inspected repair thread is not red, so the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition is false. The policy makes a false explicit intent condition independently sufficient for No release, regardless of other matches.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "F refuted establishes that the thread does not differ from the required red thread; A2 makes this the only explicit condition, while A1 establishes active intent. A3–A6 establish a custody-record match with a matching, distinguishing, nonpublic identifier. A7 establishes an incomplete required verification step, excluding Release authorized, and A8 excludes another observed contradiction. These conditions are sufficient for Hold—strong match.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The claimant’s intent to claim sealed item T-884 is active."}, {"id": "F", "statement": "The inspected zipper-repair thread color on sealed item T-884 differs from the red thread specified by the claimant as a condition of claiming that same item."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The red-thread condition is the claimant’s only explicit condition on claiming sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The description in the claimant’s 16 September report matches sealed item T-884 in the custody record."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap of sealed item T-884 match the initials and location stated by the claimant."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap are a distinguishing identifier of sealed item T-884."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The initials LM under the flap were not publicly disclosed before the claimant reported them."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "At least one required verification step for sealed item T-884 remains incomplete."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "No observed detail of sealed item T-884 other than the zipper-thread comparison represented by F contradicts the claimant’s description."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Release policy\",\"text\":\"Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.\\nNo release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.\\nHold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.\\nHold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.\\nRelease authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Field officer\",\"text\":\"The claim for sealed item T-884 remains active, and the signed claim form contains no other explicit condition. The claimant’s 16 September report matches the custody record’s navy canvas tool roll, six carving tools, repaired zipper, recovery from bus 418 after the 15 September final run, and North Depot storage.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Evidence registrar\",\"text\":\"The report places initials LM under the flap, matching inspection. The registry classifies those initials in that location as a distinguishing identifier, and disclosure logs confirm they were not public before the report.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Custody analyst\",\"text\":\"At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Inspection officer\",\"text\":\"At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as blue, which the calibrated colorimeter distinguishes from red.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verification officer\",\"text\":\"Apart from the comparison documented above, no observed detail conflicts with the claimant’s description. The required independent seal-number verification remains incomplete.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "F", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47."}, {"path": ["4", "text"], "text": "At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as blue, which the calibrated colorimeter distinguishes from red."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "A supported mismatch makes the claimant’s explicit red-thread condition false, which is independently sufficient for No release regardless of descriptive matches.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The sole explicit condition is not false, intent is active, the report matches the custody record, a matching identifier is both distinguishing and nonpublic, no other observed contradiction exists, and a required verification step remains; these facts are sufficient for Hold—strong match and exclude both No release and Release authorized.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "F", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47.", "negative_right": "At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as red, which the calibrated colorimeter classifies as the same color as red.", "right": "At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as blue, which the calibrated colorimeter distinguishes from red."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-173-004", "id": "scale-diverse-173-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["No release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.", "Hold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.", "Hold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.", "Release authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction."], "instructions": "Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.", "type": "score"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Release policy", "text": "Assign the release-readiness level under this policy: a claimant’s explicit conditional intent controls even when item details otherwise match. If the stated condition is false, do not release. Otherwise, assess specificity and custody consistency using the ordered levels below.\nNo release: the claimant has withdrawn the claim or an explicit condition of the claimant’s intent is false, regardless of descriptive matches.\nHold—weak match: intent to claim is active, but evidence consists only of generic features or lacks a custody-compatible date, location, or distinguishing detail.\nHold—strong match: intent is active and the description matches the custody record plus at least one nonpublic distinguishing identifier, but a required verification step remains.\nRelease authorized: intent is active, custody is consistent, all required checks are complete, and at least two specific identifying details—including one nonpublic detail—match without contradiction."}, {"speaker": "Field officer", "text": "The claim for sealed item T-884 remains active, and the signed claim form contains no other explicit condition. The claimant’s 16 September report matches the custody record’s navy canvas tool roll, six carving tools, repaired zipper, recovery from bus 418 after the 15 September final run, and North Depot storage."}, {"speaker": "Evidence registrar", "text": "The report places initials LM under the flap, matching inspection. The registry classifies those initials in that location as a distinguishing identifier, and disclosure logs confirm they were not public before the report."}, {"speaker": "Custody analyst", "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 16 September 2026, the custody map for sealed item T-884 identifies stitch run 47 as the zipper-repair thread, and the claimant's signed condition specifies red for stitch run 47."}, {"speaker": "Inspection officer", "text": "At 09:35 UTC on 16 September 2026, inspection of sealed item T-884 records stitch run 47 as red, which the calibrated colorimeter classifies as the same color as red."}, {"speaker": "Verification officer", "text": "Apart from the comparison documented above, no observed detail conflicts with the claimant’s description. The required independent seal-number verification remains incomplete."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-173", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6d42f938924ac710e25e811643a9c9487d64ece1c2ced6c495d87cdfa22a9eac", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy requiring the latest verified custody update, while the unchanged questions preserve the full scoring rubric and instructions. They keep the same claimant-to-item decision scope and relevant entity, record, and decision-time bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the stored item's latest verified lining code, creating a coherent distinctive-detail conflict without contradicting the stated agreement of the three circumstance comparisons. Neither context contains a score, gold answer, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Operational handoff for Lena Mora’s claim: On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and issued a verified custody update. No later custody entry was available when the release claim was decided, so this update postdates every other available custody entry. The complete decision record, after applying that update, contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons. Three are circumstance comparisons—item type, recovery date, and recovery location—and every one agrees. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison and relates the lining code Lena reported to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 update.\\n\\nBefore Lena made her report, the stored item’s lining code had not been disclosed to her. Custody staff classify that code as a distinctive identifying detail. The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \\\"VX-314-C\\\" at 14:26 on May 11. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \\\"VX-314-C\\\".\\n\\nPolicy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \"VX-314-C\" at 14:26 on May 11."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \"VX-314-C\"."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \"VX-314-C\" at 14:26 on May 11.", "negative_left": "The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \"VX-314-C\" at 14:26 on May 11.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \"VX-341-C\".", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \"VX-314-C\"."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-174-003", "id": "scale-diverse-174-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Operational handoff for Lena Mora’s claim: On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and issued a verified custody update. No later custody entry was available when the release claim was decided, so this update postdates every other available custody entry. The complete decision record, after applying that update, contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons. Three are circumstance comparisons—item type, recovery date, and recovery location—and every one agrees. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison and relates the lining code Lena reported to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 update.\n\nBefore Lena made her report, the stored item’s lining code had not been disclosed to her. Custody staff classify that code as a distinctive identifying detail. The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \"VX-314-C\" at 14:26 on May 11. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \"VX-314-C\".\n\nPolicy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy requiring the latest verified custody update, while the unchanged questions preserve the full scoring rubric and instructions. They keep the same claimant-to-item decision scope and relevant entity, record, and decision-time bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the stored item's latest verified lining code, creating a coherent distinctive-detail conflict without contradicting the stated agreement of the three circumstance comparisons. Neither context contains a score, gold answer, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Operational handoff for Lena Mora’s claim: On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and issued a verified custody update. No later custody entry was available when the release claim was decided, so this update postdates every other available custody entry. The complete decision record, after applying that update, contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons. Three are circumstance comparisons—item type, recovery date, and recovery location—and every one agrees. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison and relates the lining code Lena reported to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 update.\\n\\nBefore Lena made her report, the stored item’s lining code had not been disclosed to her. Custody staff classify that code as a distinctive identifying detail. The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \\\"VX-314-C\\\" at 14:26 on May 11. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \\\"VX-314-C\\\".\\n\\nPolicy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \"VX-314-C\" at 14:26 on May 11."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \"VX-314-C\"."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \"VX-314-C\" at 14:26 on May 11.", "negative_left": "The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \"VX-314-C\" at 14:26 on May 11.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \"VX-341-C\".", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \"VX-314-C\"."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-174-003", "id": "scale-diverse-174-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Operational handoff for Lena Mora’s claim: On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and issued a verified custody update. No later custody entry was available when the release claim was decided, so this update postdates every other available custody entry. The complete decision record, after applying that update, contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons. Three are circumstance comparisons—item type, recovery date, and recovery location—and every one agrees. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison and relates the lining code Lena reported to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 update.\n\nBefore Lena made her report, the stored item’s lining code had not been disclosed to her. Custody staff classify that code as a distinctive identifying detail. The operational handoff log states that Lena Mora reported the lining code \"VX-314-C\" at 14:26 on May 11. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as \"VX-341-C\".\n\nPolicy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing latest-verified-update policy, while the unchanged questions preserve the full scoring rubric and release instructions. They preserve Lena Mora, the claimant-to-stored-item decision, and the relevant May 12–13, 2026 timeline. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the inspected lining code from Q7M-482 to Q7N-482; this creates a detail conflict without contradicting the statement that only the three circumstance comparisons agree. Neither context contains a score, gold answer, output instruction, rule table, proposition identifier, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Field note — Lena Mora release review. The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update. When the release claim is decided, it postdates every other available custody entry for the item. Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482. The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7M-482. Before Lena submitted her report, the stored item's lining code had not been disclosed to her; custodial practice classifies it as a distinctive identifying detail. After applying the May 13 update, the complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons. Exactly three are circumstance comparisons—item type, recovery date, and recovery location—and all three agree. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison and compares Lena's reported lining code with the code recorded in that physical inspection. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482."}, {"path": [], "text": "The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7M-482."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482.", "negative_right": "The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7N-482.", "right": "The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7M-482."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-174-004", "id": "scale-diverse-174-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Field note — Lena Mora release review. The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update. When the release claim is decided, it postdates every other available custody entry for the item. Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482. The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7M-482. Before Lena submitted her report, the stored item's lining code had not been disclosed to her; custodial practice classifies it as a distinctive identifying detail. After applying the May 13 update, the complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons. Exactly three are circumstance comparisons—item type, recovery date, and recovery location—and all three agree. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison and compares Lena's reported lining code with the code recorded in that physical inspection. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing latest-verified-update policy, while the unchanged questions preserve the full scoring rubric and release instructions. They preserve Lena Mora, the claimant-to-stored-item decision, and the relevant May 12–13, 2026 timeline. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the inspected lining code from Q7M-482 to Q7N-482; this creates a detail conflict without contradicting the statement that only the three circumstance comparisons agree. Neither context contains a score, gold answer, output instruction, rule table, proposition identifier, or explicit label rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Field note — Lena Mora release review. The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update. When the release claim is decided, it postdates every other available custody entry for the item. Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482. The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7M-482. Before Lena submitted her report, the stored item's lining code had not been disclosed to her; custodial practice classifies it as a distinctive identifying detail. After applying the May 13 update, the complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons. Exactly three are circumstance comparisons—item type, recovery date, and recovery location—and all three agree. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison and compares Lena's reported lining code with the code recorded in that physical inspection. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482."}, {"path": [], "text": "The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7M-482."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482.", "negative_right": "The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7N-482.", "right": "The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7M-482."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-174-004", "id": "scale-diverse-174-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Field note — Lena Mora release review. The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update. When the release claim is decided, it postdates every other available custody entry for the item. Lena Mora's claimant field note, submitted at 09:20 UTC on May 12, 2026, reports the lining code as Q7M-482. The stored item's physical-inspection update, completed at 16:45 UTC on May 13, 2026, records the lining code as Q7N-482. Before Lena submitted her report, the stored item's lining code had not been disclosed to her; custodial practice classifies it as a distinctive identifying detail. After applying the May 13 update, the complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons. Exactly three are circumstance comparisons—item type, recovery date, and recovery location—and all three agree. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison and compares Lena's reported lining code with the code recorded in that physical inspection. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original managing-editor policy, while the unchanged questions preserve the request and scoring criteria. The same pitch, intake date, decision scope, and relevant entities remain bound throughout. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes only S-63’s status from on record to background only, without conflicting with the exhaustive two-person roster or other unchanged observations. Neither context states the correct choice or instructs the classifier what to output; the readiness and routing language is governing policy rather than answer leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship or thresholded fact, and A4 is a factual submission-property rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are both feasible under the policy. The cited state passage preserves the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement rules; question-originated criteria need not be duplicated in policy_evidence. Both rules include sufficient routing and support-status conditions for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 establishes a municipal-policy central subject, which routes to City. A2–A4 satisfy the outline, clips, and source requirements, while A5 refutes accessibility of the primary record. Thus exactly one support requirement is missing, giving R3 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A1 establishes City routing. A2 and A3 satisfy the outline and clips requirements, while refuted A4 and A5 establish failure of both the source and primary-record requirements. Therefore at least two required supports are missing, giving R2 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At intake, the central subject of “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible outline."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains at least two accessible published clips."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” has at least two named on-record sources."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible primary record."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Intake reviewer\",\"text\":\"The intake review for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” logged a 1,500-word investigation whose central subject is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Roster check\",\"text\":\"At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Status check\",\"text\":\"At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked both S-14 and S-63 as on record.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Attachment check\",\"text\":\"The attached outline opened successfully. Exactly two linked published clips were also accessible and readable during the check.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Record check\",\"text\":\"The primary-record slot contained only a clerk-release notice with no working ledger link. No primary record was attached or reachable at intake.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Managing editor\",\"text\":\"Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked both S-14 and S-63 as on record."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline, two clips, and two named on-record sources satisfy those support requirements, while the inaccessible or absent primary record leaves exactly one required supporting item missing. That is R3, which does not advance.", "target": "city_no_r3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline and two clips are present, but both the two-named-on-record-sources requirement and the accessible-primary-record requirement are unsatisfied. At least two required supporting items are therefore missing, yielding R2 and no advancement.", "target": "city_no_r2", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell.", "negative_left": "At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell.", "negative_right": "At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked S-14 as on record and S-63 as background only.", "right": "At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked both S-14 and S-63 as on record."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-211-004", "id": "scale-diverse-211-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"business_no_r3": "Route to Business, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_no_r2": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R2 because at least two required supporting items are missing.", "city_no_r3": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_yes_r4": "Route to City, advance, and rate R4 because all required supporting material is present.", "none_of_above": "Choose only if none of the listed desk, advancement, and readiness combinations matches the rubric.", "science_no_r3": "Route to Science, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing."}, "instructions": "Select the single option that correctly routes the pitch, makes the yes/no advancement decision, and assigns readiness under the stated rubric.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Intake reviewer", "text": "The intake review for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” logged a 1,500-word investigation whose central subject is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"speaker": "Roster check", "text": "At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell."}, {"speaker": "Status check", "text": "At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked both S-14 and S-63 as on record."}, {"speaker": "Attachment check", "text": "The attached outline opened successfully. Exactly two linked published clips were also accessible and readable during the check."}, {"speaker": "Record check", "text": "The primary-record slot contained only a clerk-release notice with no working ledger link. No primary record was attached or reachable at intake."}, {"speaker": "Managing editor", "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-211", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "cbc6df5790624cfa72896fc4a6eb60ea90eca64b7a733760d9524c63ea357a4d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "city_no_r3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original managing-editor policy, while the unchanged questions preserve the request and scoring criteria. The same pitch, intake date, decision scope, and relevant entities remain bound throughout. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes only S-63’s status from on record to background only, without conflicting with the exhaustive two-person roster or other unchanged observations. Neither context states the correct choice or instructs the classifier what to output; the readiness and routing language is governing policy rather than answer leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship or thresholded fact, and A4 is a factual submission-property rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are both feasible under the policy. The cited state passage preserves the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement rules; question-originated criteria need not be duplicated in policy_evidence. Both rules include sufficient routing and support-status conditions for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 establishes a municipal-policy central subject, which routes to City. A2–A4 satisfy the outline, clips, and source requirements, while A5 refutes accessibility of the primary record. Thus exactly one support requirement is missing, giving R3 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A1 establishes City routing. A2 and A3 satisfy the outline and clips requirements, while refuted A4 and A5 establish failure of both the source and primary-record requirements. Therefore at least two required supports are missing, giving R2 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At intake, the central subject of “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible outline."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains at least two accessible published clips."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” has at least two named on-record sources."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible primary record."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Intake reviewer\",\"text\":\"The intake review for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” logged a 1,500-word investigation whose central subject is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Roster check\",\"text\":\"At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Status check\",\"text\":\"At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked both S-14 and S-63 as on record.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Attachment check\",\"text\":\"The attached outline opened successfully. Exactly two linked published clips were also accessible and readable during the check.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Record check\",\"text\":\"The primary-record slot contained only a clerk-release notice with no working ledger link. No primary record was attached or reachable at intake.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Managing editor\",\"text\":\"Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked both S-14 and S-63 as on record."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline, two clips, and two named on-record sources satisfy those support requirements, while the inaccessible or absent primary record leaves exactly one required supporting item missing. That is R3, which does not advance.", "target": "city_no_r3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline and two clips are present, but both the two-named-on-record-sources requirement and the accessible-primary-record requirement are unsatisfied. At least two required supporting items are therefore missing, yielding R2 and no advancement.", "target": "city_no_r2", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell.", "negative_left": "At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell.", "negative_right": "At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked S-14 as on record and S-63 as background only.", "right": "At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked both S-14 and S-63 as on record."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-211-004", "id": "scale-diverse-211-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"business_no_r3": "Route to Business, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_no_r2": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R2 because at least two required supporting items are missing.", "city_no_r3": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_yes_r4": "Route to City, advance, and rate R4 because all required supporting material is present.", "none_of_above": "Choose only if none of the listed desk, advancement, and readiness combinations matches the rubric.", "science_no_r3": "Route to Science, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing."}, "instructions": "Select the single option that correctly routes the pitch, makes the yes/no advancement decision, and assigns readiness under the stated rubric.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Intake reviewer", "text": "The intake review for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” logged a 1,500-word investigation whose central subject is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"speaker": "Roster check", "text": "At intake on 14 May 2026, the exhaustive source roster in the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” consisted only of entry S-14, naming Lina Voss, and entry S-63, naming Dario Pell."}, {"speaker": "Status check", "text": "At that intake, the submission’s source-status fields marked S-14 as on record and S-63 as background only."}, {"speaker": "Attachment check", "text": "The attached outline opened successfully. Exactly two linked published clips were also accessible and readable during the check."}, {"speaker": "Record check", "text": "The primary-record slot contained only a clerk-release notice with no working ledger link. No primary record was attached or reachable at intake."}, {"speaker": "Managing editor", "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-211", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "cbc6df5790624cfa72896fc4a6eb60ea90eca64b7a733760d9524c63ea357a4d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "city_no_r2"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement policy, while the unchanged questions preserve the choice criteria. The submission identity, title, timestamp, and decision scope remain fixed. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the named on-record source count from exactly two to exactly one and does not conflict with any other counterfactual assertion. Neither context embeds a choice code, gold answer, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship or thresholded fact, and A4 is a factual submission-property rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are both feasible under the policy. The cited state passage preserves the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement rules; question-originated criteria need not be duplicated in policy_evidence. Both rules include sufficient routing and support-status conditions for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 establishes a municipal-policy central subject, which routes to City. A2–A4 satisfy the outline, clips, and source requirements, while A5 refutes accessibility of the primary record. Thus exactly one support requirement is missing, giving R3 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A1 establishes City routing. A2 and A3 satisfy the outline and clips requirements, while refuted A4 and A5 establish failure of both the source and primary-record requirements. Therefore at least two required supports are missing, giving R2 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At intake, the central subject of “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible outline."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains at least two accessible published clips."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” has at least two named on-record sources."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible primary record."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Records clerk\",\"text\":\"At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Evidence register\",\"text\":\"At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly two sources identified by name whose statements were designated on the record.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Intake reviewer\",\"text\":\"The intake review describes the work’s central subject as policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office, rather than its spreadsheet-based reporting method.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Attachment checker\",\"text\":\"The supplied outline opened successfully, as did two separately published clips. The primary-record field led only to a restricted-release notice; no primary record was accessible for opening, viewing, or download at intake.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Managing editor\",\"text\":\"Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly two sources identified by name whose statements were designated on the record."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline, two clips, and two named on-record sources satisfy those support requirements, while the inaccessible or absent primary record leaves exactly one required supporting item missing. That is R3, which does not advance.", "target": "city_no_r3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline and two clips are present, but both the two-named-on-record-sources requirement and the accessible-primary-record requirement are unsatisfied. At least two required supporting items are therefore missing, yielding R2 and no advancement.", "target": "city_no_r2", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”.", "negative_left": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”.", "negative_right": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly one source identified by name whose statements were designated on the record.", "right": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly two sources identified by name whose statements were designated on the record."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-211-006", "id": "scale-diverse-211-006-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"business_no_r3": "Route to Business, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_no_r2": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R2 because at least two required supporting items are missing.", "city_no_r3": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_yes_r4": "Route to City, advance, and rate R4 because all required supporting material is present.", "none_of_above": "Choose only if none of the listed desk, advancement, and readiness combinations matches the rubric.", "science_no_r3": "Route to Science, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing."}, "instructions": "Select the single option that correctly routes the pitch, makes the yes/no advancement decision, and assigns readiness under the stated rubric.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Records clerk", "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”."}, {"speaker": "Evidence register", "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly two sources identified by name whose statements were designated on the record."}, {"speaker": "Intake reviewer", "text": "The intake review describes the work’s central subject as policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office, rather than its spreadsheet-based reporting method."}, {"speaker": "Attachment checker", "text": "The supplied outline opened successfully, as did two separately published clips. The primary-record field led only to a restricted-release notice; no primary record was accessible for opening, viewing, or download at intake."}, {"speaker": "Managing editor", "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-211", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "cbc6df5790624cfa72896fc4a6eb60ea90eca64b7a733760d9524c63ea357a4d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "city_no_r3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement policy, while the unchanged questions preserve the choice criteria. The submission identity, title, timestamp, and decision scope remain fixed. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the named on-record source count from exactly two to exactly one and does not conflict with any other counterfactual assertion. Neither context embeds a choice code, gold answer, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship or thresholded fact, and A4 is a factual submission-property rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are both feasible under the policy. The cited state passage preserves the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement rules; question-originated criteria need not be duplicated in policy_evidence. Both rules include sufficient routing and support-status conditions for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 establishes a municipal-policy central subject, which routes to City. A2–A4 satisfy the outline, clips, and source requirements, while A5 refutes accessibility of the primary record. Thus exactly one support requirement is missing, giving R3 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A1 establishes City routing. A2 and A3 satisfy the outline and clips requirements, while refuted A4 and A5 establish failure of both the source and primary-record requirements. Therefore at least two required supports are missing, giving R2 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At intake, the central subject of “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible outline."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains at least two accessible published clips."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” has at least two named on-record sources."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible primary record."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Records clerk\",\"text\":\"At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Evidence register\",\"text\":\"At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly two sources identified by name whose statements were designated on the record.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Intake reviewer\",\"text\":\"The intake review describes the work’s central subject as policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office, rather than its spreadsheet-based reporting method.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Attachment checker\",\"text\":\"The supplied outline opened successfully, as did two separately published clips. The primary-record field led only to a restricted-release notice; no primary record was accessible for opening, viewing, or download at intake.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Managing editor\",\"text\":\"Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly two sources identified by name whose statements were designated on the record."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline, two clips, and two named on-record sources satisfy those support requirements, while the inaccessible or absent primary record leaves exactly one required supporting item missing. That is R3, which does not advance.", "target": "city_no_r3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline and two clips are present, but both the two-named-on-record-sources requirement and the accessible-primary-record requirement are unsatisfied. At least two required supporting items are therefore missing, yielding R2 and no advancement.", "target": "city_no_r2", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”.", "negative_left": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”.", "negative_right": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly one source identified by name whose statements were designated on the record.", "right": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly two sources identified by name whose statements were designated on the record."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-211-006", "id": "scale-diverse-211-006-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"business_no_r3": "Route to Business, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_no_r2": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R2 because at least two required supporting items are missing.", "city_no_r3": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_yes_r4": "Route to City, advance, and rate R4 because all required supporting material is present.", "none_of_above": "Choose only if none of the listed desk, advancement, and readiness combinations matches the rubric.", "science_no_r3": "Route to Science, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing."}, "instructions": "Select the single option that correctly routes the pitch, makes the yes/no advancement decision, and assigns readiness under the stated rubric.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Records clerk", "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the intake clerk assigned identifier BLH-731 exclusively to the submission titled “The Last Rent-Control Ledger”."}, {"speaker": "Evidence register", "text": "At 09:12 UTC on 14 March 2026, the submission assigned identifier BLH-731 contained exactly one source identified by name whose statements were designated on the record."}, {"speaker": "Intake reviewer", "text": "The intake review describes the work’s central subject as policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office, rather than its spreadsheet-based reporting method."}, {"speaker": "Attachment checker", "text": "The supplied outline opened successfully, as did two separately published clips. The primary-record field led only to a restricted-release notice; no primary record was accessible for opening, viewing, or download at intake."}, {"speaker": "Managing editor", "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-211", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "cbc6df5790624cfa72896fc4a6eb60ea90eca64b7a733760d9524c63ea357a4d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "city_no_r2"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts reproduce the governing routing, readiness, and required-material policies without additions or exceptions, and they retain the same pitch, desk, readiness-level request, intake package, and timestamps. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes the complete inventory by removing the interview transcript while leaving the other facts unchanged, with no conflicting duplicate inventory. Neither context contains a gold label, answer code, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit answer rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A5 is an acceptable universal fact over the submitted photographs. A4 is factual rather than policy-based. The policy evidence correctly preserves the governing routing, readiness, and required-material rules from the original state, while rules already retained in the questions need not be duplicated. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are realizable: all required materials can be present with no clarification needed, or the transcript alone can be absent without creating a contradiction with A6 being refuted.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion, presence of every required item, and absence of a need for editorial clarification. This is sufficient for the requested Urban Affairs/readiness-3 outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion while explicitly refuting attachment of the required interview transcript. Thus required material is missing, which mandates readiness level 1 and makes the requested readiness-3 outcome false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” is centered on housing policy."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "A draft is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "A source list is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "An interview transcript is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every photograph submitted with Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake has an attached permission."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” needs editorial clarification before section review."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47.\",\"The commissioning summary describes the pitch as an investigation centered on housing policy.\",\"The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, one interview transcript, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form.\",\"At 09:30 UTC, the intake editor recorded that the pitch’s scope and presentation needed no editorial clarification before section review.\"],\"request\":\"Should the pitch advance to Urban Affairs at readiness level 3?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, one interview transcript, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, every required supporting item is attached, and no editorial clarification is needed before section review, so readiness level 3 applies.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, but its required interview transcript is not attached, so required material is missing and readiness level 1 applies rather than level 3.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47.", "negative_left": "At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47.", "negative_right": "The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form.", "right": "The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, one interview transcript, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-213-001", "id": "scale-diverse-213-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — although Urban Affairs is the correct desk, do not advance it at level 3 because at least one required supporting item is missing; assign readiness level 1.", "true": "Yes — route the pitch to Urban Affairs and advance it as readiness level 3 because every required supporting item is present."}, "instructions": "Resolve the coreferences in Leo’s statement, apply the routing and readiness rubric, and answer the yes/no request.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs.", "evidence": ["At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47.", "The commissioning summary describes the pitch as an investigation centered on housing policy.", "The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, one interview transcript, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form.", "At 09:30 UTC, the intake editor recorded that the pitch’s scope and presentation needed no editorial clarification before section review."], "request": "Should the pitch advance to Urban Affairs at readiness level 3?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-213", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "eebed6fab380a9cf21780ea4b72f53bdd0f128f73c5771bba42efcc9a21f6764", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts reproduce the governing routing, readiness, and required-material policies without additions or exceptions, and they retain the same pitch, desk, readiness-level request, intake package, and timestamps. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes the complete inventory by removing the interview transcript while leaving the other facts unchanged, with no conflicting duplicate inventory. Neither context contains a gold label, answer code, proposition identifier, output instruction, or explicit answer rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A5 is an acceptable universal fact over the submitted photographs. A4 is factual rather than policy-based. The policy evidence correctly preserves the governing routing, readiness, and required-material rules from the original state, while rules already retained in the questions need not be duplicated. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are realizable: all required materials can be present with no clarification needed, or the transcript alone can be absent without creating a contradiction with A6 being refuted.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion, presence of every required item, and absence of a need for editorial clarification. This is sufficient for the requested Urban Affairs/readiness-3 outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion while explicitly refuting attachment of the required interview transcript. Thus required material is missing, which mandates readiness level 1 and makes the requested readiness-3 outcome false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” is centered on housing policy."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "A draft is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "A source list is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "An interview transcript is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every photograph submitted with Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake has an attached permission."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” needs editorial clarification before section review."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47.\",\"The commissioning summary describes the pitch as an investigation centered on housing policy.\",\"The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, one interview transcript, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form.\",\"At 09:30 UTC, the intake editor recorded that the pitch’s scope and presentation needed no editorial clarification before section review.\"],\"request\":\"Should the pitch advance to Urban Affairs at readiness level 3?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, one interview transcript, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, every required supporting item is attached, and no editorial clarification is needed before section review, so readiness level 3 applies.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, but its required interview transcript is not attached, so required material is missing and readiness level 1 applies rather than level 3.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47.", "negative_left": "At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47.", "negative_right": "The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form.", "right": "The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, one interview transcript, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-213-001", "id": "scale-diverse-213-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — although Urban Affairs is the correct desk, do not advance it at level 3 because at least one required supporting item is missing; assign readiness level 1.", "true": "Yes — route the pitch to Urban Affairs and advance it as readiness level 3 because every required supporting item is present."}, "instructions": "Resolve the coreferences in Leo’s statement, apply the routing and readiness rubric, and answer the yes/no request.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs.", "evidence": ["At 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026, Leo submitted the pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” under intake package IC-47.", "The commissioning summary describes the pitch as an investigation centered on housing policy.", "The complete item-by-item inventory recorded for intake package IC-47 at 09:14 UTC on 12 March 2026 lists exactly one draft, one source list, and six photographs, each paired with a permission form.", "At 09:30 UTC, the intake editor recorded that the pitch’s scope and presentation needed no editorial clarification before section review."], "request": "Should the pitch advance to Urban Affairs at readiness level 3?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-213", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "eebed6fab380a9cf21780ea4b72f53bdd0f128f73c5771bba42efcc9a21f6764", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same routing and readiness rubric, request, pitch, desk, and intake-time bindings. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes only the registry classification of HC-68 from an interview transcript to an editorial memo, making the required transcript absent without contradicting the exclusive file list or unchanged evidence. Neither context includes a gold answer, output code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A5 is an acceptable universal fact over the submitted photographs. A4 is factual rather than policy-based. The policy evidence correctly preserves the governing routing, readiness, and required-material rules from the original state, while rules already retained in the questions need not be duplicated. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are realizable: all required materials can be present with no clarification needed, or the transcript alone can be absent without creating a contradiction with A6 being refuted.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion, presence of every required item, and absence of a need for editorial clarification. This is sufficient for the requested Urban Affairs/readiness-3 outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion while explicitly refuting attachment of the required interview transcript. Thus required material is missing, which mandates readiness level 1 and makes the requested readiness-3 outcome false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” is centered on housing policy."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "A draft is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "A source list is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "An interview transcript is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every photograph submitted with Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake has an attached permission."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” needs editorial clarification before section review."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs.\",\"evidence\":[\"Priya’s handoff note describes Leo’s pitch as an investigation centered on housing policy and confirms that he submitted it through intake.\",\"At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79.\",\"The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, interview transcript, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively.\",\"The photo manifest lists six submitted courtyard portraits, and its permissions check marks every listed photograph as covered by the attached permission bundle.\",\"Marta’s completed screening note reports no editorial question requiring clarification before section review.\"],\"request\":\"Should the pitch advance to Urban Affairs at readiness level 3?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, interview transcript, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, every required supporting item is attached, and no editorial clarification is needed before section review, so readiness level 3 applies.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, but its required interview transcript is not attached, so required material is missing and readiness level 1 applies rather than level 3.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79.", "negative_left": "At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79.", "negative_right": "The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, editorial memo, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively.", "right": "The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, interview transcript, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-213-003", "id": "scale-diverse-213-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — although Urban Affairs is the correct desk, do not advance it at level 3 because at least one required supporting item is missing; assign readiness level 1.", "true": "Yes — route the pitch to Urban Affairs and advance it as readiness level 3 because every required supporting item is present."}, "instructions": "Resolve the coreferences in Leo’s statement, apply the routing and readiness rubric, and answer the yes/no request.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs.", "evidence": ["Priya’s handoff note describes Leo’s pitch as an investigation centered on housing policy and confirms that he submitted it through intake.", "At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79.", "The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, interview transcript, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively.", "The photo manifest lists six submitted courtyard portraits, and its permissions check marks every listed photograph as covered by the attached permission bundle.", "Marta’s completed screening note reports no editorial question requiring clarification before section review."], "request": "Should the pitch advance to Urban Affairs at readiness level 3?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-213", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "eebed6fab380a9cf21780ea4b72f53bdd0f128f73c5771bba42efcc9a21f6764", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same routing and readiness rubric, request, pitch, desk, and intake-time bindings. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes only the registry classification of HC-68 from an interview transcript to an editorial memo, making the required transcript absent without contradicting the exclusive file list or unchanged evidence. Neither context includes a gold answer, output code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A5 is an acceptable universal fact over the submitted photographs. A4 is factual rather than policy-based. The policy evidence correctly preserves the governing routing, readiness, and required-material rules from the original state, while rules already retained in the questions need not be duplicated. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are realizable: all required materials can be present with no clarification needed, or the transcript alone can be absent without creating a contradiction with A6 being refuted.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion, presence of every required item, and absence of a need for editorial clarification. This is sufficient for the requested Urban Affairs/readiness-3 outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion while explicitly refuting attachment of the required interview transcript. Thus required material is missing, which mandates readiness level 1 and makes the requested readiness-3 outcome false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” is centered on housing policy."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "A draft is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "A source list is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "An interview transcript is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every photograph submitted with Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake has an attached permission."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” needs editorial clarification before section review."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs.\",\"evidence\":[\"Priya’s handoff note describes Leo’s pitch as an investigation centered on housing policy and confirms that he submitted it through intake.\",\"At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79.\",\"The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, interview transcript, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively.\",\"The photo manifest lists six submitted courtyard portraits, and its permissions check marks every listed photograph as covered by the attached permission bundle.\",\"Marta’s completed screening note reports no editorial question requiring clarification before section review.\"],\"request\":\"Should the pitch advance to Urban Affairs at readiness level 3?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, interview transcript, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, every required supporting item is attached, and no editorial clarification is needed before section review, so readiness level 3 applies.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, but its required interview transcript is not attached, so required material is missing and readiness level 1 applies rather than level 3.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79.", "negative_left": "At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79.", "negative_right": "The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, editorial memo, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively.", "right": "The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, interview transcript, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-213-003", "id": "scale-diverse-213-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — although Urban Affairs is the correct desk, do not advance it at level 3 because at least one required supporting item is missing; assign readiness level 1.", "true": "Yes — route the pitch to Urban Affairs and advance it as readiness level 3 because every required supporting item is present."}, "instructions": "Resolve the coreferences in Leo’s statement, apply the routing and readiness rubric, and answer the yes/no request.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs.", "evidence": ["Priya’s handoff note describes Leo’s pitch as an investigation centered on housing policy and confirms that he submitted it through intake.", "At the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake handoff, the only files attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” bore identifiers HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79.", "The registry for the 2026-09-14 09:40 UTC intake records the complete and exclusive document-type classifications of files HC-47, HC-52, HC-68, and HC-79 as draft, source list, editorial memo, and photograph-permission bundle, respectively.", "The photo manifest lists six submitted courtyard portraits, and its permissions check marks every listed photograph as covered by the attached permission bundle.", "Marta’s completed screening note reports no editorial question requiring clarification before section review."], "request": "Should the pitch advance to Urban Affairs at readiness level 3?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-213", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "eebed6fab380a9cf21780ea4b72f53bdd0f128f73c5771bba42efcc9a21f6764", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts leave the Civic-routing and four-item readiness rubric unchanged and concern the same pitch, submission, and decision. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the audit’s distinct-person assertion; it does not contradict the personnel register because one human can coherently be recorded under two names or credentials. Neither context states the decision, readiness result, answer code, rule table, proposition identifiers, label rationale, or an output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "refuted", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A10": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A10": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A10": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A10": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A10": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A10": "supported"}, "right": {"A10": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; universally quantified photograph/interviewee atoms remain atomic. A10 is a factual identity/distinctness relation rather than policy. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A10 changing: the two names can denote distinct people in the base case and aliases for one person in the counter case, consistently with the remaining atoms. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is entirely in the retained questions object; no substantive state-originating rule is additionally needed.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction sufficiently establishes Civic routing and all four required items. A1–A2 establish primary examination of a municipal rule’s effects on residents; A3 establishes the synopsis; A4–A5 establish an excerpt of at least 800 words; A6–A10 establish confirmations from two distinct named interviewees; and A12–A15 establish a visual plan whose designated photographs are owned and authorized for publication.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A10 refuted, Mara Venn and Luis Ortega are the same person, while A11 excludes any other confirmed named interviewee. Thus the submission has confirmation from only one distinct named interviewee and fails the at-least-two requirement. The other three required items and Civic routing are established, so readiness is 3 rather than 4 and the requested decision is false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The pitch primarily examines the effects of permit P on apartment residents."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Permit P is a municipal rule."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The submission includes a synopsis."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The submission includes a reported excerpt."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The reported excerpt in the submission contains at least 800 words."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The submission includes written confirmation from Mara Venn."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Mara Venn is a named interviewee for the pitch."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The submission includes written confirmation from Luis Ortega."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Luis Ortega is a named interviewee for the pitch."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Mara Venn and Luis Ortega are distinct people."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Every named interviewee whose written confirmation is included in the submission is either Mara Venn or Luis Ortega."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "The submission includes a visual plan."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "The visual plan designates the six hive photographs in the submission."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "The submitting writer owns every photograph designated by the visual plan."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "Every photograph designated by the visual plan is authorized for publication."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Handoff editor\",\"text\":\"The pitch primarily examines the effects of permit P on apartment residents, and permit P is a municipal rule; incidental food material does not change that focus.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Intake coordinator\",\"text\":\"The submission includes a synopsis and a reported excerpt containing 846 words. Written confirmations from Mara Venn and Luis Ortega are included, and each is a named interviewee for the pitch. Every named interviewee whose written confirmation is included is either Mara Venn or Luis Ortega.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Records liaison\",\"text\":\"At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Audit liaison\",\"text\":\"The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as two different human beings.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Visuals coordinator\",\"text\":\"The submission includes a visual plan designating its six hive photographs. The submitting writer owns every photograph designated by the plan, and every designated photograph is authorized for publication.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A10", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as two different human beings."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at the Civic desk, and the two distinct named interviewees make the confirmations count as two; all four required items are present and readiness is 4.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at the Civic desk, but the two names identify one person and no other confirmed named interviewee exists; only three required items are present, so readiness is 3 rather than 4.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906.", "negative_left": "At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906.", "negative_right": "The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as the same human being.", "right": "The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as two different human beings."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-214-003", "id": "scale-diverse-214-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not advance it to the Civic desk at readiness level 4.", "true": "Yes — advance the pitch to the Civic desk and assign readiness level 4."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric. Route pitches primarily examining municipal rules and their effects on residents to the Civic desk, even if they contain food material. Advance only if the submission includes all four required items: a synopsis, a reported excerpt of at least 800 words, written confirmation from at least two named interviewees, and a rights-cleared visual plan. Readiness is ordered by the number of required items present: 1 = zero or one, 2 = two, 3 = three, 4 = all four. Question: Should this pitch advance to the Civic desk with readiness level 4?", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Handoff editor", "text": "The pitch primarily examines the effects of permit P on apartment residents, and permit P is a municipal rule; incidental food material does not change that focus."}, {"speaker": "Intake coordinator", "text": "The submission includes a synopsis and a reported excerpt containing 846 words. Written confirmations from Mara Venn and Luis Ortega are included, and each is a named interviewee for the pitch. Every named interviewee whose written confirmation is included is either Mara Venn or Luis Ortega."}, {"speaker": "Records liaison", "text": "At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906."}, {"speaker": "Audit liaison", "text": "The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as two different human beings."}, {"speaker": "Visuals coordinator", "text": "The submission includes a visual plan designating its six hive photographs. The submitting writer owns every photograph designated by the plan, and every designated photograph is authorized for publication."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-214", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "22e24dc5261979b1c7f6c8223a55681d569347dafd0ec8ce90ab6aa368e2da7b", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts leave the Civic-routing and four-item readiness rubric unchanged and concern the same pitch, submission, and decision. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the audit’s distinct-person assertion; it does not contradict the personnel register because one human can coherently be recorded under two names or credentials. Neither context states the decision, readiness result, answer code, rule table, proposition identifiers, label rationale, or an output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "refuted", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "refuted", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A10": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A10": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A10": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A10": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A10": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A10": "supported"}, "right": {"A10": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; universally quantified photograph/interviewee atoms remain atomic. A10 is a factual identity/distinctness relation rather than policy. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A10 changing: the two names can denote distinct people in the base case and aliases for one person in the counter case, consistently with the remaining atoms. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is entirely in the retained questions object; no substantive state-originating rule is additionally needed.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction sufficiently establishes Civic routing and all four required items. A1–A2 establish primary examination of a municipal rule’s effects on residents; A3 establishes the synopsis; A4–A5 establish an excerpt of at least 800 words; A6–A10 establish confirmations from two distinct named interviewees; and A12–A15 establish a visual plan whose designated photographs are owned and authorized for publication.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A10 refuted, Mara Venn and Luis Ortega are the same person, while A11 excludes any other confirmed named interviewee. Thus the submission has confirmation from only one distinct named interviewee and fails the at-least-two requirement. The other three required items and Civic routing are established, so readiness is 3 rather than 4 and the requested decision is false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The pitch primarily examines the effects of permit P on apartment residents."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Permit P is a municipal rule."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The submission includes a synopsis."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The submission includes a reported excerpt."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The reported excerpt in the submission contains at least 800 words."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The submission includes written confirmation from Mara Venn."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Mara Venn is a named interviewee for the pitch."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The submission includes written confirmation from Luis Ortega."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Luis Ortega is a named interviewee for the pitch."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Mara Venn and Luis Ortega are distinct people."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Every named interviewee whose written confirmation is included in the submission is either Mara Venn or Luis Ortega."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "The submission includes a visual plan."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "The visual plan designates the six hive photographs in the submission."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "The submitting writer owns every photograph designated by the visual plan."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "Every photograph designated by the visual plan is authorized for publication."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Handoff editor\",\"text\":\"The pitch primarily examines the effects of permit P on apartment residents, and permit P is a municipal rule; incidental food material does not change that focus.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Intake coordinator\",\"text\":\"The submission includes a synopsis and a reported excerpt containing 846 words. Written confirmations from Mara Venn and Luis Ortega are included, and each is a named interviewee for the pitch. Every named interviewee whose written confirmation is included is either Mara Venn or Luis Ortega.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Records liaison\",\"text\":\"At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Audit liaison\",\"text\":\"The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as two different human beings.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Visuals coordinator\",\"text\":\"The submission includes a visual plan designating its six hive photographs. The submitting writer owns every photograph designated by the plan, and every designated photograph is authorized for publication.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A10", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as two different human beings."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at the Civic desk, and the two distinct named interviewees make the confirmations count as two; all four required items are present and readiness is 4.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at the Civic desk, but the two names identify one person and no other confirmed named interviewee exists; only three required items are present, so readiness is 3 rather than 4.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906.", "negative_left": "At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906.", "negative_right": "The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as the same human being.", "right": "The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as two different human beings."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-214-003", "id": "scale-diverse-214-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not advance it to the Civic desk at readiness level 4.", "true": "Yes — advance the pitch to the Civic desk and assign readiness level 4."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric. Route pitches primarily examining municipal rules and their effects on residents to the Civic desk, even if they contain food material. Advance only if the submission includes all four required items: a synopsis, a reported excerpt of at least 800 words, written confirmation from at least two named interviewees, and a rights-cleared visual plan. Readiness is ordered by the number of required items present: 1 = zero or one, 2 = two, 3 = three, 4 = all four. Question: Should this pitch advance to the Civic desk with readiness level 4?", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Handoff editor", "text": "The pitch primarily examines the effects of permit P on apartment residents, and permit P is a municipal rule; incidental food material does not change that focus."}, {"speaker": "Intake coordinator", "text": "The submission includes a synopsis and a reported excerpt containing 846 words. Written confirmations from Mara Venn and Luis Ortega are included, and each is a named interviewee for the pitch. Every named interviewee whose written confirmation is included is either Mara Venn or Luis Ortega."}, {"speaker": "Records liaison", "text": "At the 14:20 operational handoff on 17 September 2026, the verified personnel register identifies Mara Venn as the holder of credential C-417 and Luis Ortega as the holder of credential C-906."}, {"speaker": "Audit liaison", "text": "The credential audit completed at 14:18 on 17 September 2026 records the holders of credentials C-417 and C-906 as the same human being."}, {"speaker": "Visuals coordinator", "text": "The submission includes a visual plan designating its six hive photographs. The submitting writer owns every photograph designated by the plan, and every designated photograph is authorized for publication."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-214", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "22e24dc5261979b1c7f6c8223a55681d569347dafd0ec8ce90ab6aa368e2da7b", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the desk-routing and advancement policies, along with the pitch, writer, subject, and requested readiness-decision scope. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences; the counterfactual changes only R-9031’s evidence classification and remains consistent with the sole-item manifest, zero named contacts, and absence of recordings or linked public records. Neither context contains a readiness answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the focus atom concerns the evidence type of E-17 rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on whether E-17 is an interview transcript and are jointly realizable: in the counterfactual it can be some nonqualifying item. The policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive routing, advancement, accepted-evidence, and paraphrase rules originating in the original state. The readiness criteria and instructions remain automatically available through the unchanged questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and one submitted item that is an interview transcript, hence a qualifying attachment. That excludes level 0, while the missing source contacts exclude levels 2–4, making level 1 sufficient.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and exactly one candidate-evidence item that is neither a transcript, recording, nor linked public record. Thus there is no qualifying supporting material, which is sufficient for level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Pitch P is a reported pitch."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Pitch P is a neighborhood culture story."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Pitch P is routed to the City Life desk."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Pitch P contains zero named source contacts."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The submission manifest for pitch P contains exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type interview transcript."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type recording."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type linked public record."}], "base_state_json": "\"Operational handoff: Pitch P is Lena Ortiz’s reported feature about apartment residents’ food-growing project in Cedar Square and is categorized as a neighborhood culture story. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material. The routing log places pitch P with the City Life desk. Intake staff verified that the pitch and all submission materials contain zero named source contacts. At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031. At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 assigned it exactly one evidence type: interview transcript. Repository and intake checks found no recording and no linked public record anywhere in the submission.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 assigned it exactly one evidence type: interview transcript."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk."}, {"path": [], "text": "To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The correct desk is identified and the sole submitted evidence item is an interview transcript, so at least one qualifying attachment is supplied. Because the pitch has zero named source contacts, both required source contacts are still missing and the pitch must be held for major additions.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The desk is identifiable, but the pitch has zero named source contacts and its sole candidate-evidence item is neither an interview transcript, a recording, nor a linked public record. It therefore has no qualifying supporting material and cannot advance.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031.", "negative_left": "At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031.", "negative_right": "At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 classified it exclusively as a paraphrased recollection, not as an interview transcript, recording, or linked public record.", "right": "At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 assigned it exactly one evidence type: interview transcript."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-215-003", "id": "scale-diverse-215-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Decline at intake: the desk can be identified, but the pitch has no qualifying supporting material and therefore cannot advance.", "1 — Hold for major additions: at least one identifiable source or qualifying attachment is supplied, but both required source contacts or an acceptable evidence type are still missing.", "2 — Conditionally advance: two named source contacts and one qualifying evidence type are present, but the reporting plan or article angle needs substantial clarification.", "3 — Advance to section review: all required support is present, the desk is appropriate, and only minor editorial questions remain.", "4 — Priority advance: all requirements are present, the desk fit is strong, and the pitch includes unusually complete, immediately usable reporting and a polished angle."], "instructions": "Route the pitch under the stated policy, verify its supporting material, decide whether it advances, and select the single readiness level that applies. Treat the writer’s paraphrase according to the explicit evidence rule.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Operational handoff: Pitch P is Lena Ortiz’s reported feature about apartment residents’ food-growing project in Cedar Square and is categorized as a neighborhood culture story. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material. The routing log places pitch P with the City Life desk. Intake staff verified that the pitch and all submission materials contain zero named source contacts. At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031. At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 assigned it exactly one evidence type: interview transcript. Repository and intake checks found no recording and no linked public record anywhere in the submission."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-215", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "532d99fb15debec3012555c7b5e1afe9f95ef6908cd4c88d9fccdb633bbef86c", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the desk-routing and advancement policies, along with the pitch, writer, subject, and requested readiness-decision scope. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences; the counterfactual changes only R-9031’s evidence classification and remains consistent with the sole-item manifest, zero named contacts, and absence of recordings or linked public records. Neither context contains a readiness answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the focus atom concerns the evidence type of E-17 rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on whether E-17 is an interview transcript and are jointly realizable: in the counterfactual it can be some nonqualifying item. The policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive routing, advancement, accepted-evidence, and paraphrase rules originating in the original state. The readiness criteria and instructions remain automatically available through the unchanged questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and one submitted item that is an interview transcript, hence a qualifying attachment. That excludes level 0, while the missing source contacts exclude levels 2–4, making level 1 sufficient.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and exactly one candidate-evidence item that is neither a transcript, recording, nor linked public record. Thus there is no qualifying supporting material, which is sufficient for level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Pitch P is a reported pitch."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Pitch P is a neighborhood culture story."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Pitch P is routed to the City Life desk."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Pitch P contains zero named source contacts."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The submission manifest for pitch P contains exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type interview transcript."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type recording."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type linked public record."}], "base_state_json": "\"Operational handoff: Pitch P is Lena Ortiz’s reported feature about apartment residents’ food-growing project in Cedar Square and is categorized as a neighborhood culture story. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material. The routing log places pitch P with the City Life desk. Intake staff verified that the pitch and all submission materials contain zero named source contacts. At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031. At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 assigned it exactly one evidence type: interview transcript. Repository and intake checks found no recording and no linked public record anywhere in the submission.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 assigned it exactly one evidence type: interview transcript."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk."}, {"path": [], "text": "To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The correct desk is identified and the sole submitted evidence item is an interview transcript, so at least one qualifying attachment is supplied. Because the pitch has zero named source contacts, both required source contacts are still missing and the pitch must be held for major additions.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The desk is identifiable, but the pitch has zero named source contacts and its sole candidate-evidence item is neither an interview transcript, a recording, nor a linked public record. It therefore has no qualifying supporting material and cannot advance.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031.", "negative_left": "At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031.", "negative_right": "At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 classified it exclusively as a paraphrased recollection, not as an interview transcript, recording, or linked public record.", "right": "At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 assigned it exactly one evidence type: interview transcript."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-215-003", "id": "scale-diverse-215-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Decline at intake: the desk can be identified, but the pitch has no qualifying supporting material and therefore cannot advance.", "1 — Hold for major additions: at least one identifiable source or qualifying attachment is supplied, but both required source contacts or an acceptable evidence type are still missing.", "2 — Conditionally advance: two named source contacts and one qualifying evidence type are present, but the reporting plan or article angle needs substantial clarification.", "3 — Advance to section review: all required support is present, the desk is appropriate, and only minor editorial questions remain.", "4 — Priority advance: all requirements are present, the desk fit is strong, and the pitch includes unusually complete, immediately usable reporting and a polished angle."], "instructions": "Route the pitch under the stated policy, verify its supporting material, decide whether it advances, and select the single readiness level that applies. Treat the writer’s paraphrase according to the explicit evidence rule.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Operational handoff: Pitch P is Lena Ortiz’s reported feature about apartment residents’ food-growing project in Cedar Square and is categorized as a neighborhood culture story. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material. The routing log places pitch P with the City Life desk. Intake staff verified that the pitch and all submission materials contain zero named source contacts. At 14:26 UTC on 8 March 2026, pitch P's submission handoff manifest listed E-17 as its sole candidate-evidence item and identified E-17 as repository object R-9031. At 14:25 UTC on 8 March 2026, the repository record for object R-9031 classified it exclusively as a paraphrased recollection, not as an interview transcript, recording, or linked public record. Repository and intake checks found no recording and no linked public record anywhere in the submission."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-215", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "532d99fb15debec3012555c7b5e1afe9f95ef6908cd4c88d9fccdb633bbef86c", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing desk-routing and advancement policies, while the unchanged questions preserve the scoring criteria and request scope. The pitch, evidence-item relationships, ledger timestamp, and comparison path remain fixed across contexts; only Q-42’s evidence type changes in one complete factual sentence, coherently changing E-17’s inferred matching type without conflicting with the other facts. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences, and neither context includes an answer, score code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the focus atom concerns the evidence type of E-17 rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on whether E-17 is an interview transcript and are jointly realizable: in the counterfactual it can be some nonqualifying item. The policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive routing, advancement, accepted-evidence, and paraphrase rules originating in the original state. The readiness criteria and instructions remain automatically available through the unchanged questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and one submitted item that is an interview transcript, hence a qualifying attachment. That excludes level 0, while the missing source contacts exclude levels 2–4, making level 1 sufficient.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and exactly one candidate-evidence item that is neither a transcript, recording, nor linked public record. Thus there is no qualifying supporting material, which is sufficient for level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Pitch P is a reported pitch."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Pitch P is a neighborhood culture story."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Pitch P is routed to the City Life desk."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Pitch P contains zero named source contacts."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The submission manifest for pitch P contains exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type interview transcript."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type recording."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type linked public record."}], "base_state_json": "\"Field note: Pitch P is a reported pitch concerning neighborhood culture. The intake routing record assigns it to the City Life desk. Its submission manifest lists exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17, and identifies Q-42 only as a comparison item outside the submission. No named source contacts appear anywhere in the pitch or manifest. The final ledger marks E-17 as neither a recording nor a linked public record. In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type. In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is interview transcript. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type."}, {"path": [], "text": "In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is interview transcript."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk."}, {"path": [], "text": "To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The correct desk is identified and the sole submitted evidence item is an interview transcript, so at least one qualifying attachment is supplied. Because the pitch has zero named source contacts, both required source contacts are still missing and the pitch must be held for major additions.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The desk is identifiable, but the pitch has zero named source contacts and its sole candidate-evidence item is neither an interview transcript, a recording, nor a linked public record. It therefore has no qualifying supporting material and cannot advance.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type.", "negative_left": "In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type.", "negative_right": "In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is paraphrased recollection.", "right": "In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is interview transcript."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-215-004", "id": "scale-diverse-215-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Decline at intake: the desk can be identified, but the pitch has no qualifying supporting material and therefore cannot advance.", "1 — Hold for major additions: at least one identifiable source or qualifying attachment is supplied, but both required source contacts or an acceptable evidence type are still missing.", "2 — Conditionally advance: two named source contacts and one qualifying evidence type are present, but the reporting plan or article angle needs substantial clarification.", "3 — Advance to section review: all required support is present, the desk is appropriate, and only minor editorial questions remain.", "4 — Priority advance: all requirements are present, the desk fit is strong, and the pitch includes unusually complete, immediately usable reporting and a polished angle."], "instructions": "Route the pitch under the stated policy, verify its supporting material, decide whether it advances, and select the single readiness level that applies. Treat the writer’s paraphrase according to the explicit evidence rule.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Field note: Pitch P is a reported pitch concerning neighborhood culture. The intake routing record assigns it to the City Life desk. Its submission manifest lists exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17, and identifies Q-42 only as a comparison item outside the submission. No named source contacts appear anywhere in the pitch or manifest. The final ledger marks E-17 as neither a recording nor a linked public record. In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type. In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is interview transcript. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-215", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "532d99fb15debec3012555c7b5e1afe9f95ef6908cd4c88d9fccdb633bbef86c", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing desk-routing and advancement policies, while the unchanged questions preserve the scoring criteria and request scope. The pitch, evidence-item relationships, ledger timestamp, and comparison path remain fixed across contexts; only Q-42’s evidence type changes in one complete factual sentence, coherently changing E-17’s inferred matching type without conflicting with the other facts. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences, and neither context includes an answer, score code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the focus atom concerns the evidence type of E-17 rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on whether E-17 is an interview transcript and are jointly realizable: in the counterfactual it can be some nonqualifying item. The policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive routing, advancement, accepted-evidence, and paraphrase rules originating in the original state. The readiness criteria and instructions remain automatically available through the unchanged questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and one submitted item that is an interview transcript, hence a qualifying attachment. That excludes level 0, while the missing source contacts exclude levels 2–4, making level 1 sufficient.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and exactly one candidate-evidence item that is neither a transcript, recording, nor linked public record. Thus there is no qualifying supporting material, which is sufficient for level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Pitch P is a reported pitch."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Pitch P is a neighborhood culture story."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Pitch P is routed to the City Life desk."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Pitch P contains zero named source contacts."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The submission manifest for pitch P contains exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type interview transcript."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type recording."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type linked public record."}], "base_state_json": "\"Field note: Pitch P is a reported pitch concerning neighborhood culture. The intake routing record assigns it to the City Life desk. Its submission manifest lists exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17, and identifies Q-42 only as a comparison item outside the submission. No named source contacts appear anywhere in the pitch or manifest. The final ledger marks E-17 as neither a recording nor a linked public record. In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type. In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is interview transcript. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type."}, {"path": [], "text": "In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is interview transcript."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk."}, {"path": [], "text": "To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The correct desk is identified and the sole submitted evidence item is an interview transcript, so at least one qualifying attachment is supplied. Because the pitch has zero named source contacts, both required source contacts are still missing and the pitch must be held for major additions.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The desk is identifiable, but the pitch has zero named source contacts and its sole candidate-evidence item is neither an interview transcript, a recording, nor a linked public record. It therefore has no qualifying supporting material and cannot advance.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type.", "negative_left": "In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type.", "negative_right": "In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is paraphrased recollection.", "right": "In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is interview transcript."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-215-004", "id": "scale-diverse-215-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Decline at intake: the desk can be identified, but the pitch has no qualifying supporting material and therefore cannot advance.", "1 — Hold for major additions: at least one identifiable source or qualifying attachment is supplied, but both required source contacts or an acceptable evidence type are still missing.", "2 — Conditionally advance: two named source contacts and one qualifying evidence type are present, but the reporting plan or article angle needs substantial clarification.", "3 — Advance to section review: all required support is present, the desk is appropriate, and only minor editorial questions remain.", "4 — Priority advance: all requirements are present, the desk fit is strong, and the pitch includes unusually complete, immediately usable reporting and a polished angle."], "instructions": "Route the pitch under the stated policy, verify its supporting material, decide whether it advances, and select the single readiness level that applies. Treat the writer’s paraphrase according to the explicit evidence rule.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Field note: Pitch P is a reported pitch concerning neighborhood culture. The intake routing record assigns it to the City Life desk. Its submission manifest lists exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17, and identifies Q-42 only as a comparison item outside the submission. No named source contacts appear anywhere in the pitch or manifest. The final ledger marks E-17 as neither a recording nor a linked public record. In pitch P's final submission ledger timestamped 2026-09-16 14:20 UTC, candidate-evidence item E-17 and comparison item Q-42 are assigned the same single evidence type. In that ledger, comparison item Q-42's single evidence type is paraphrased recollection. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-215", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "532d99fb15debec3012555c7b5e1afe9f95ef6908cd4c88d9fccdb633bbef86c", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy, request scope, and relevant pitch/entity bindings, while the unchanged questions preserve the full scoring rubric. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently replaces the coded-contact assertion with the factual claim that Tomas Rhee received no code, without conflicting with the unchanged source count, identities, or role information. Neither context contains an explicit readiness score, gold label, classifier instruction, proposition identifier, or answer key; the source-map codes are ordinary case facts rather than answer codes.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "refuted", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A8": "supported"}, "right": {"A8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the universally quantified source-map atoms remain atomic. A8 is a factual property of the submitted source map rather than a policy proposition. The base and counter assignments can coexist with all unchanged atoms: the same attached map can list all sources and their roles while differing only in whether every listed source has a valid attribution-status code. The state-derived routing, material, source-map, and non-advancement rules are preserved in policy_evidence. The extra state request citation is unnecessary but does not make the policy incomplete; question-originated rubric details need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes the Investigations routing, all generally required materials, every Investigations source-map requirement, and the level-3 editorial showing. Refutation of unusually strong documentation necessarily excludes level 4 because that quality is a required conjunct of level 4.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A8 establishes that the source map fails to provide an allowed attribution status for at least one listed source. Because the map lists every identified source and the pitch is otherwise routeable, this is an applicable missing administrative requirement, making level 1 mandatory and barring advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, the subject matter of Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is an allegation of systemic wrongdoing."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is assigned to the Investigations desk."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, the outline submitted with Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch contains between 250 and 400 words inclusive."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch includes at least two relevant published clips."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 is attached to Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Source map SM-1 lists every source identified in Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch at Northline Magazine intake."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Source map SM-1 identifies a role for every source it lists."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "For every source listed in source map SM-1, SM-1 assigns a code that its legend maps to on-record, background, or confidential contact."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch has a plausible premise."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch identifies a sourcing path."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch includes relevant evidence."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch demonstrates unusually strong documentation."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 08:45 on 14 May 2026, intake classified Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch as alleging systemic wrongdoing and assigned it to the Investigations desk.\",\"At 08:50, staff logged a 330-word outline, two relevant published clips, and attached source map SM-1.\",\"At 09:00, the pitch named exactly Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano as sources and identified interviews and contract records as its sourcing path.\",\"At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano.\",\"At 09:12, the auditor confirmed that SM-1 identified Calder as a procurement officer, Rhee as a contractor, and Solano as a procurement analyst.\",\"At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned codes C-17, B-42, and R-68 to Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano respectively, and that the SM-1 legend mapped those codes respectively to confidential, background, and on-record contact.\",\"At 09:20, the editor found the premise plausible and the attached contract-award spreadsheet relevant evidence, but judged the documentation adequate rather than unusually strong.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned codes C-17, B-42, and R-68 to Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano respectively, and that the SM-1 legend mapped those codes respectively to confidential, background, and on-record contact."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch is correctly routed to Investigations, satisfies every applicable administrative requirement, and has a plausible premise, an identified sourcing path, and relevant evidence. Refutation of unusually strong documentation excludes level 4, which requires that quality in addition to level 3.", "target": "3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The systemic-wrongdoing subject makes the Investigations desk clear, but the submitted source map fails the Investigations requirement to state whether contact with every source is on-record, background, or confidential. The ordered rubric therefore requires return for completion and no advancement despite the otherwise sufficient editorial showing.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano.", "negative_right": "At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned no code to Tomas Rhee.", "right": "At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned codes C-17, B-42, and R-68 to Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano respectively, and that the SM-1 legend mapped those codes respectively to confidential, background, and on-record contact."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-216-005", "id": "scale-diverse-216-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Unrouteable or out of scope: the pitch lacks a discernible magazine subject or cannot be assigned to any desk; do not advance.", "1 — Routeable but administratively incomplete: the appropriate desk is clear, but at least one required supporting item is missing; return for completion and do not advance.", "2 — Administratively complete but editorially weak: all required materials are present, yet the premise, sourcing plan, or evidence is too thin for section-editor review; decline or request redevelopment.", "3 — Ready for section review: correctly routed, administratively complete, and supported by a plausible premise, identified sourcing path, and relevant evidence; advance to the section editor.", "4 — Commission-ready priority: meets level 3 and also demonstrates unusually strong documentation, timely significance, clear access, and a distinctive or exclusive angle; escalate to the managing editor for prompt commissioning consideration."], "instructions": "Apply the ordered rubric exactly. Desk assignment follows the subject matter, not the writer’s requested desk. Select one level and include its routing and advancement consequence.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong.", "evidence": ["At 08:45 on 14 May 2026, intake classified Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch as alleging systemic wrongdoing and assigned it to the Investigations desk.", "At 08:50, staff logged a 330-word outline, two relevant published clips, and attached source map SM-1.", "At 09:00, the pitch named exactly Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano as sources and identified interviews and contract records as its sourcing path.", "At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano.", "At 09:12, the auditor confirmed that SM-1 identified Calder as a procurement officer, Rhee as a contractor, and Solano as a procurement analyst.", "At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned codes C-17, B-42, and R-68 to Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano respectively, and that the SM-1 legend mapped those codes respectively to confidential, background, and on-record contact.", "At 09:20, the editor found the premise plausible and the attached contract-award spreadsheet relevant evidence, but judged the documentation adequate rather than unusually strong."], "request": "Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-216", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "115ca52b48fc3e00e029fe3e36be6adc7e0aeac5dc5492fb9dfb8c73b79ac0f2", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 3}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy, request scope, and relevant pitch/entity bindings, while the unchanged questions preserve the full scoring rubric. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently replaces the coded-contact assertion with the factual claim that Tomas Rhee received no code, without conflicting with the unchanged source count, identities, or role information. Neither context contains an explicit readiness score, gold label, classifier instruction, proposition identifier, or answer key; the source-map codes are ordinary case facts rather than answer codes.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "refuted", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "refuted", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A8": "supported"}, "right": {"A8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the universally quantified source-map atoms remain atomic. A8 is a factual property of the submitted source map rather than a policy proposition. The base and counter assignments can coexist with all unchanged atoms: the same attached map can list all sources and their roles while differing only in whether every listed source has a valid attribution-status code. The state-derived routing, material, source-map, and non-advancement rules are preserved in policy_evidence. The extra state request citation is unnecessary but does not make the policy incomplete; question-originated rubric details need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes the Investigations routing, all generally required materials, every Investigations source-map requirement, and the level-3 editorial showing. Refutation of unusually strong documentation necessarily excludes level 4 because that quality is a required conjunct of level 4.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A8 establishes that the source map fails to provide an allowed attribution status for at least one listed source. Because the map lists every identified source and the pitch is otherwise routeable, this is an applicable missing administrative requirement, making level 1 mandatory and barring advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, the subject matter of Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is an allegation of systemic wrongdoing."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is assigned to the Investigations desk."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, the outline submitted with Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch contains between 250 and 400 words inclusive."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch includes at least two relevant published clips."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 is attached to Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Source map SM-1 lists every source identified in Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch at Northline Magazine intake."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Source map SM-1 identifies a role for every source it lists."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "For every source listed in source map SM-1, SM-1 assigns a code that its legend maps to on-record, background, or confidential contact."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch has a plausible premise."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch identifies a sourcing path."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch includes relevant evidence."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch demonstrates unusually strong documentation."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong.\",\"evidence\":[\"At 08:45 on 14 May 2026, intake classified Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch as alleging systemic wrongdoing and assigned it to the Investigations desk.\",\"At 08:50, staff logged a 330-word outline, two relevant published clips, and attached source map SM-1.\",\"At 09:00, the pitch named exactly Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano as sources and identified interviews and contract records as its sourcing path.\",\"At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano.\",\"At 09:12, the auditor confirmed that SM-1 identified Calder as a procurement officer, Rhee as a contractor, and Solano as a procurement analyst.\",\"At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned codes C-17, B-42, and R-68 to Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano respectively, and that the SM-1 legend mapped those codes respectively to confidential, background, and on-record contact.\",\"At 09:20, the editor found the premise plausible and the attached contract-award spreadsheet relevant evidence, but judged the documentation adequate rather than unusually strong.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned codes C-17, B-42, and R-68 to Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano respectively, and that the SM-1 legend mapped those codes respectively to confidential, background, and on-record contact."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch is correctly routed to Investigations, satisfies every applicable administrative requirement, and has a plausible premise, an identified sourcing path, and relevant evidence. Refutation of unusually strong documentation excludes level 4, which requires that quality in addition to level 3.", "target": "3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The systemic-wrongdoing subject makes the Investigations desk clear, but the submitted source map fails the Investigations requirement to state whether contact with every source is on-record, background, or confidential. The ordered rubric therefore requires return for completion and no advancement despite the otherwise sufficient editorial showing.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano.", "negative_right": "At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned no code to Tomas Rhee.", "right": "At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned codes C-17, B-42, and R-68 to Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano respectively, and that the SM-1 legend mapped those codes respectively to confidential, background, and on-record contact."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-216-005", "id": "scale-diverse-216-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Unrouteable or out of scope: the pitch lacks a discernible magazine subject or cannot be assigned to any desk; do not advance.", "1 — Routeable but administratively incomplete: the appropriate desk is clear, but at least one required supporting item is missing; return for completion and do not advance.", "2 — Administratively complete but editorially weak: all required materials are present, yet the premise, sourcing plan, or evidence is too thin for section-editor review; decline or request redevelopment.", "3 — Ready for section review: correctly routed, administratively complete, and supported by a plausible premise, identified sourcing path, and relevant evidence; advance to the section editor.", "4 — Commission-ready priority: meets level 3 and also demonstrates unusually strong documentation, timely significance, clear access, and a distinctive or exclusive angle; escalate to the managing editor for prompt commissioning consideration."], "instructions": "Apply the ordered rubric exactly. Desk assignment follows the subject matter, not the writer’s requested desk. Select one level and include its routing and advancement consequence.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong.", "evidence": ["At 08:45 on 14 May 2026, intake classified Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch as alleging systemic wrongdoing and assigned it to the Investigations desk.", "At 08:50, staff logged a 330-word outline, two relevant published clips, and attached source map SM-1.", "At 09:00, the pitch named exactly Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano as sources and identified interviews and contract records as its sourcing path.", "At 09:10 on 14 May 2026, Northline Magazine's intake auditor recorded that source map SM-1 listed exactly three sources: Inez Calder, Tomas Rhee, and Petra Solano.", "At 09:12, the auditor confirmed that SM-1 identified Calder as a procurement officer, Rhee as a contractor, and Solano as a procurement analyst.", "At 09:14 on 14 May 2026, the intake auditor recorded that SM-1 assigned no code to Tomas Rhee.", "At 09:20, the editor found the premise plausible and the attached contract-award spreadsheet relevant evidence, but judged the documentation adequate rather than unusually strong."], "request": "Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-216", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "115ca52b48fc3e00e029fe3e36be6adc7e0aeac5dc5492fb9dfb8c73b79ac0f2", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original price, lead-time, capacity, certification, document-attachment, technical-match, boundary-value, and clarification policies without adding exceptions or defaults. They preserve the PR-482 supplier-bid approval question and its current-evaluation scope. The focus evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences. The sole counterfactual change—from quoted capacity of 740/month to 480/month—is coherent with the unchanged 600/month requirement and does not create a duplicate contradictory measurement. Neither context contains an explicit answer, answer code, proposition ID, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A3": "supported"}, "right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship rather than a final policy classification. A3 is a factual capacity comparison and is an appropriate focus. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A3 changing: a supplier can meet or fail the capacity minimum while all other facts remain satisfied. The state-derived policy evidence preserves the thresholds, inclusive boundaries, current attachment requirement, non-waiver rule, and clarification consequence needed in addition to the automatically retained question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current-document requirement. It therefore sufficiently entails the true outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A3 entails that quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's required minimum. Since any unsatisfied stated requirement requires the false outcome, this conjunction is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The total price quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than $12,000."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The lead time quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than 30 calendar days."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The monthly gasket capacity stated in the supplier quotation for PR-482 is greater than or equal to the minimum monthly gasket capacity stated in PR-482."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current at the time the PR-482 package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The supplier's current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The required material certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "The drawing submitted for PR-482 bears the required signature at the time the package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The signed drawing is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matches the technical specification in PR-482."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Procurement policy record\",\"text\":\"Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Request log\",\"text\":\"At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Quotation log\",\"text\":\"At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 740 gaskets.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Commercial review\",\"text\":\"The same quotation listed a total price of $11,850 and a lead time of 28 calendar days.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Certification review\",\"text\":\"At evaluation, the supplier’s ISO 9001 certification was current, and its current certificate was attached to the PR-482 package.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Document review\",\"text\":\"The required material certificate was attached. The submitted drawing bore the required signature, and that signed drawing was attached to the package at evaluation.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical review\",\"text\":\"The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matched the technical specification in PR-482.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical policy record\",\"text\":\"technical match does not waive the attachment requirements.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Approval policy record\",\"text\":\"Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 740 gaskets."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, including the permitted boundary values.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's minimum monthly capacity, so at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.", "negative_right": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 480 gaskets.", "right": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 740 gaskets."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-273-001", "id": "scale-diverse-273-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now, so do not route for approval; route for supplier clarification.", "true": "Yes — every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, so route for approval."}, "instructions": "Is the supplier bid ready to route for approval now under the stated rubric? Resolve pronouns using their nearest coherent antecedent.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Procurement policy record", "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"speaker": "Request log", "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}, {"speaker": "Quotation log", "text": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 740 gaskets."}, {"speaker": "Commercial review", "text": "The same quotation listed a total price of $11,850 and a lead time of 28 calendar days."}, {"speaker": "Certification review", "text": "At evaluation, the supplier’s ISO 9001 certification was current, and its current certificate was attached to the PR-482 package."}, {"speaker": "Document review", "text": "The required material certificate was attached. The submitted drawing bore the required signature, and that signed drawing was attached to the package at evaluation."}, {"speaker": "Technical review", "text": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matched the technical specification in PR-482."}, {"speaker": "Technical policy record", "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"speaker": "Approval policy record", "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-273", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "705cd3052bdf64748b8250949b9404bf1efac894ae897e1c1a0f25374b6c3b6f", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original price, lead-time, capacity, certification, document-attachment, technical-match, boundary-value, and clarification policies without adding exceptions or defaults. They preserve the PR-482 supplier-bid approval question and its current-evaluation scope. The focus evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences. The sole counterfactual change—from quoted capacity of 740/month to 480/month—is coherent with the unchanged 600/month requirement and does not create a duplicate contradictory measurement. Neither context contains an explicit answer, answer code, proposition ID, rule table, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A3": "supported"}, "right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship rather than a final policy classification. A3 is a factual capacity comparison and is an appropriate focus. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A3 changing: a supplier can meet or fail the capacity minimum while all other facts remain satisfied. The state-derived policy evidence preserves the thresholds, inclusive boundaries, current attachment requirement, non-waiver rule, and clarification consequence needed in addition to the automatically retained question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current-document requirement. It therefore sufficiently entails the true outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A3 entails that quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's required minimum. Since any unsatisfied stated requirement requires the false outcome, this conjunction is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The total price quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than $12,000."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The lead time quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than 30 calendar days."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The monthly gasket capacity stated in the supplier quotation for PR-482 is greater than or equal to the minimum monthly gasket capacity stated in PR-482."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current at the time the PR-482 package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The supplier's current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The required material certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "The drawing submitted for PR-482 bears the required signature at the time the package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The signed drawing is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matches the technical specification in PR-482."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Procurement policy record\",\"text\":\"Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Request log\",\"text\":\"At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Quotation log\",\"text\":\"At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 740 gaskets.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Commercial review\",\"text\":\"The same quotation listed a total price of $11,850 and a lead time of 28 calendar days.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Certification review\",\"text\":\"At evaluation, the supplier’s ISO 9001 certification was current, and its current certificate was attached to the PR-482 package.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Document review\",\"text\":\"The required material certificate was attached. The submitted drawing bore the required signature, and that signed drawing was attached to the package at evaluation.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical review\",\"text\":\"The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matched the technical specification in PR-482.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical policy record\",\"text\":\"technical match does not waive the attachment requirements.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Approval policy record\",\"text\":\"Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 740 gaskets."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, including the permitted boundary values.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's minimum monthly capacity, so at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.", "negative_left": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.", "negative_right": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 480 gaskets.", "right": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 740 gaskets."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-273-001", "id": "scale-diverse-273-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now, so do not route for approval; route for supplier clarification.", "true": "Yes — every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, so route for approval."}, "instructions": "Is the supplier bid ready to route for approval now under the stated rubric? Resolve pronouns using their nearest coherent antecedent.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Procurement policy record", "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"speaker": "Request log", "text": "At 09:10 UTC on 14 August 2026, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}, {"speaker": "Quotation log", "text": "At 09:25 UTC on 14 August 2026, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 480 gaskets."}, {"speaker": "Commercial review", "text": "The same quotation listed a total price of $11,850 and a lead time of 28 calendar days."}, {"speaker": "Certification review", "text": "At evaluation, the supplier’s ISO 9001 certification was current, and its current certificate was attached to the PR-482 package."}, {"speaker": "Document review", "text": "The required material certificate was attached. The submitted drawing bore the required signature, and that signed drawing was attached to the package at evaluation."}, {"speaker": "Technical review", "text": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matched the technical specification in PR-482."}, {"speaker": "Technical policy record", "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"speaker": "Approval policy record", "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-273", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "705cd3052bdf64748b8250949b9404bf1efac894ae897e1c1a0f25374b6c3b6f", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original approval thresholds, attachment timing requirement, boundary-value treatment, and clarification route without adding exceptions or defaults. The PR-482 approval decision and current 2026-09-17 handoff framing remain fixed. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the quoted monthly capacity from 640 to 580; the separate 600 figure is the request's minimum threshold, so the figures are not contradictory duplicates. Neither context contains an answer code, explicit gold decision, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A3": "supported"}, "right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship rather than a final policy classification. A3 is a factual capacity comparison and is an appropriate focus. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A3 changing: a supplier can meet or fail the capacity minimum while all other facts remain satisfied. The state-derived policy evidence preserves the thresholds, inclusive boundaries, current attachment requirement, non-waiver rule, and clarification consequence needed in addition to the automatically retained question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current-document requirement. It therefore sufficiently entails the true outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A3 entails that quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's required minimum. Since any unsatisfied stated requirement requires the false outcome, this conjunction is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The total price quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than $12,000."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The lead time quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than 30 calendar days."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The monthly gasket capacity stated in the supplier quotation for PR-482 is greater than or equal to the minimum monthly gasket capacity stated in PR-482."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current at the time the PR-482 package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The supplier's current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The required material certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "The drawing submitted for PR-482 bears the required signature at the time the package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The signed drawing is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matches the technical specification in PR-482."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Handoff coordinator\",\"text\":\"The PR-482 package was evaluated at the 2026-09-17 operational handoff using the quotation and documents then attached.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Commercial reviewer\",\"text\":\"The supplier quoted a total price of $11,850 and a lead time of 28 calendar days for PR-482.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Quotation reviewer\",\"text\":\"At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 640 gaskets.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Request reviewer\",\"text\":\"At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Certification reviewer\",\"text\":\"The supplier's ISO 9001 certification was current when the package was evaluated, and its current certificate was attached to the PR-482 package at that time.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Document reviewer\",\"text\":\"The required material certificate was attached to the PR-482 package when evaluated. The submitted drawing bore the required signature and was also attached then.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical reviewer\",\"text\":\"The gasket specification in the supplier quotation matches the technical specification in PR-482.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical specification owner\",\"text\":\"technical match does not waive the attachment requirements.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 640 gaskets."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, including the permitted boundary values.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's minimum monthly capacity, so at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 640 gaskets.", "negative_left": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 580 gaskets.", "negative_right": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.", "right": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-273-003", "id": "scale-diverse-273-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now, so do not route for approval; route for supplier clarification.", "true": "Yes — every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, so route for approval."}, "instructions": "Is the supplier bid ready to route for approval now under the stated rubric? Resolve pronouns using their nearest coherent antecedent.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Handoff coordinator", "text": "The PR-482 package was evaluated at the 2026-09-17 operational handoff using the quotation and documents then attached."}, {"speaker": "Commercial reviewer", "text": "The supplier quoted a total price of $11,850 and a lead time of 28 calendar days for PR-482."}, {"speaker": "Quotation reviewer", "text": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 640 gaskets."}, {"speaker": "Request reviewer", "text": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}, {"speaker": "Certification reviewer", "text": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification was current when the package was evaluated, and its current certificate was attached to the PR-482 package at that time."}, {"speaker": "Document reviewer", "text": "The required material certificate was attached to the PR-482 package when evaluated. The submitted drawing bore the required signature and was also attached then."}, {"speaker": "Technical reviewer", "text": "The gasket specification in the supplier quotation matches the technical specification in PR-482."}, {"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"speaker": "Technical specification owner", "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-273", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "705cd3052bdf64748b8250949b9404bf1efac894ae897e1c1a0f25374b6c3b6f", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original approval thresholds, attachment timing requirement, boundary-value treatment, and clarification route without adding exceptions or defaults. The PR-482 approval decision and current 2026-09-17 handoff framing remain fixed. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the quoted monthly capacity from 640 to 580; the separate 600 figure is the request's minimum threshold, so the figures are not contradictory duplicates. Neither context contains an answer code, explicit gold decision, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A3": "supported"}, "right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship rather than a final policy classification. A3 is a factual capacity comparison and is an appropriate focus. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A3 changing: a supplier can meet or fail the capacity minimum while all other facts remain satisfied. The state-derived policy evidence preserves the thresholds, inclusive boundaries, current attachment requirement, non-waiver rule, and clarification consequence needed in addition to the automatically retained question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current-document requirement. It therefore sufficiently entails the true outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A3 entails that quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's required minimum. Since any unsatisfied stated requirement requires the false outcome, this conjunction is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The total price quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than $12,000."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The lead time quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than 30 calendar days."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The monthly gasket capacity stated in the supplier quotation for PR-482 is greater than or equal to the minimum monthly gasket capacity stated in PR-482."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current at the time the PR-482 package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The supplier's current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The required material certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "The drawing submitted for PR-482 bears the required signature at the time the package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The signed drawing is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matches the technical specification in PR-482."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Handoff coordinator\",\"text\":\"The PR-482 package was evaluated at the 2026-09-17 operational handoff using the quotation and documents then attached.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Commercial reviewer\",\"text\":\"The supplier quoted a total price of $11,850 and a lead time of 28 calendar days for PR-482.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Quotation reviewer\",\"text\":\"At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 640 gaskets.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Request reviewer\",\"text\":\"At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Certification reviewer\",\"text\":\"The supplier's ISO 9001 certification was current when the package was evaluated, and its current certificate was attached to the PR-482 package at that time.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Document reviewer\",\"text\":\"The required material certificate was attached to the PR-482 package when evaluated. The submitted drawing bore the required signature and was also attached then.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical reviewer\",\"text\":\"The gasket specification in the supplier quotation matches the technical specification in PR-482.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical specification owner\",\"text\":\"technical match does not waive the attachment requirements.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 640 gaskets."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, including the permitted boundary values.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's minimum monthly capacity, so at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 640 gaskets.", "negative_left": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 580 gaskets.", "negative_right": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets.", "right": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-273-003", "id": "scale-diverse-273-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now, so do not route for approval; route for supplier clarification.", "true": "Yes — every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, so route for approval."}, "instructions": "Is the supplier bid ready to route for approval now under the stated rubric? Resolve pronouns using their nearest coherent antecedent.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Handoff coordinator", "text": "The PR-482 package was evaluated at the 2026-09-17 operational handoff using the quotation and documents then attached."}, {"speaker": "Commercial reviewer", "text": "The supplier quoted a total price of $11,850 and a lead time of 28 calendar days for PR-482."}, {"speaker": "Quotation reviewer", "text": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, the supplier quotation for PR-482 stated a monthly gasket capacity of 580 gaskets."}, {"speaker": "Request reviewer", "text": "At the 2026-09-17 operational handoff, PR-482 stated a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 600 gaskets."}, {"speaker": "Certification reviewer", "text": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification was current when the package was evaluated, and its current certificate was attached to the PR-482 package at that time."}, {"speaker": "Document reviewer", "text": "The required material certificate was attached to the PR-482 package when evaluated. The submitted drawing bore the required signature and was also attached then."}, {"speaker": "Technical reviewer", "text": "The gasket specification in the supplier quotation matches the technical specification in PR-482."}, {"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"speaker": "Technical specification owner", "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-273", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "705cd3052bdf64748b8250949b9404bf1efac894ae897e1c1a0f25374b6c3b6f", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the procurement terms and routing rule, while the unchanged questions object preserves the original decision criteria and instructions. The request remains bound to deciding whether Meridian should be approved for the same 800 stainless valve brackets and the same three-bid triage set. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes only AX-58's classification from an ISO 9001 certification document to a supplier profile; this does not conflict with Apex holding ISO 9001 certification, because organizational certification and attachment of certification evidence are distinct facts. Neither context states the decision, answer code, intended label, proposition identifier, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation, including the exact-bid-set atom. The focus atom concerns whether a certification document is attached to Apex's bid, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that attachment and are jointly coherent: Apex may hold ISO 9001 certification while either attaching or not attaching its certification document. The policy evidence preserves the substantive procurement rules originating in the original state; question-level instructions and outcome criteria need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish a complete three-bid set; Meridian satisfies every mandatory threshold and document requirement; Apex also satisfies every requirement and, at $11.50, is cheaper than Meridian at $12.00. Therefore Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish that Apex lacks the required attached certification document, so it cannot be approved; Meridian satisfies every mandatory term and has all required documents; Harbor costs $12.40 versus Meridian's $12.00; and the three bids are the complete set. Therefore Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of bids Lena is triaging for the purchase of 800 stainless valve brackets consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Meridian's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.00."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Meridian's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 24 days."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Meridian's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 1,000 units."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Meridian holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Apex's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $11.50."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Apex's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 20 days."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Apex's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 900 units."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Apex holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "Harbor's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.40."}], "base_state_json": "\"Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets. Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\\n\\nThe triage set consists exactly of bids from Meridian, Apex, and Harbor. Meridian quoted $12.00 per unit, promised delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Its bid has an attached quotation, ISO 9001 certification document, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Apex quoted $11.50 per unit, promised delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73. In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as an ISO 9001 certification document, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment. Harbor quoted $12.40 per unit.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73."}, {"path": [], "text": "In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as an ISO 9001 certification document, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"path": [], "text": "Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment."}, {"path": [], "text": "Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Apex meets every mandatory threshold and documentation requirement and has a lower unit price than Meridian. Because the three named bids are the complete bid set, Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Apex lacks the required attached certification document and therefore routes to clarification rather than approval. Meridian meets every mandatory threshold, has all required documents attached, and is cheaper than Harbor; because these are the only bids, Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73.", "negative_left": "At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73.", "negative_right": "In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as a supplier profile, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment.", "right": "In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as an ISO 9001 certification document, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-274-004", "id": "scale-diverse-274-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not route Meridian for approval; instead route it elsewhere or select another bid.", "true": "Yes — route Meridian for approval as the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid."}, "instructions": "Decide whether Meridian should be routed for approval under the stated triage rule. Ignore facts not included in the mandatory terms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets. Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\n\nThe triage set consists exactly of bids from Meridian, Apex, and Harbor. Meridian quoted $12.00 per unit, promised delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Its bid has an attached quotation, ISO 9001 certification document, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Apex quoted $11.50 per unit, promised delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73. In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as an ISO 9001 certification document, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment. Harbor quoted $12.40 per unit."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-274", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "16f63ae79d58448e7f5b039303369a24eb8c00ec7f7d27803be448bf5450b652", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the procurement terms and routing rule, while the unchanged questions object preserves the original decision criteria and instructions. The request remains bound to deciding whether Meridian should be approved for the same 800 stainless valve brackets and the same three-bid triage set. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes only AX-58's classification from an ISO 9001 certification document to a supplier profile; this does not conflict with Apex holding ISO 9001 certification, because organizational certification and attachment of certification evidence are distinct facts. Neither context states the decision, answer code, intended label, proposition identifier, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation, including the exact-bid-set atom. The focus atom concerns whether a certification document is attached to Apex's bid, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that attachment and are jointly coherent: Apex may hold ISO 9001 certification while either attaching or not attaching its certification document. The policy evidence preserves the substantive procurement rules originating in the original state; question-level instructions and outcome criteria need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish a complete three-bid set; Meridian satisfies every mandatory threshold and document requirement; Apex also satisfies every requirement and, at $11.50, is cheaper than Meridian at $12.00. Therefore Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish that Apex lacks the required attached certification document, so it cannot be approved; Meridian satisfies every mandatory term and has all required documents; Harbor costs $12.40 versus Meridian's $12.00; and the three bids are the complete set. Therefore Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of bids Lena is triaging for the purchase of 800 stainless valve brackets consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Meridian's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.00."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Meridian's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 24 days."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Meridian's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 1,000 units."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Meridian holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Apex's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $11.50."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Apex's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 20 days."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Apex's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 900 units."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Apex holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "Harbor's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.40."}], "base_state_json": "\"Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets. Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\\n\\nThe triage set consists exactly of bids from Meridian, Apex, and Harbor. Meridian quoted $12.00 per unit, promised delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Its bid has an attached quotation, ISO 9001 certification document, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Apex quoted $11.50 per unit, promised delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73. In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as an ISO 9001 certification document, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment. Harbor quoted $12.40 per unit.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73."}, {"path": [], "text": "In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as an ISO 9001 certification document, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"path": [], "text": "Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment."}, {"path": [], "text": "Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Apex meets every mandatory threshold and documentation requirement and has a lower unit price than Meridian. Because the three named bids are the complete bid set, Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Apex lacks the required attached certification document and therefore routes to clarification rather than approval. Meridian meets every mandatory threshold, has all required documents attached, and is cheaper than Harbor; because these are the only bids, Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73.", "negative_left": "At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73.", "negative_right": "In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as a supplier profile, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment.", "right": "In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as an ISO 9001 certification document, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-274-004", "id": "scale-diverse-274-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not route Meridian for approval; instead route it elsewhere or select another bid.", "true": "Yes — route Meridian for approval as the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid."}, "instructions": "Decide whether Meridian should be routed for approval under the stated triage rule. Ignore facts not included in the mandatory terms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets. Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\n\nThe triage set consists exactly of bids from Meridian, Apex, and Harbor. Meridian quoted $12.00 per unit, promised delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Its bid has an attached quotation, ISO 9001 certification document, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Apex quoted $11.50 per unit, promised delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. At 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, Apex's bid packet for the 800 stainless valve brackets had exactly three attached files, identified as AX-41, AX-58, and AX-73. In Apex's document register at 09:00 UTC on 14 May 2026, AX-41 was classified solely as a quotation, AX-58 solely as a supplier profile, and AX-73 solely as a signed drawing acknowledgment. Harbor quoted $12.40 per unit."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-274", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "16f63ae79d58448e7f5b039303369a24eb8c00ec7f7d27803be448bf5450b652", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original approval policy, request, PR-482 entity, requirements, and routing scope. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes only the ASTM B117 measurement from 544 hours to 462 hours, with no conflicting duplicate measurement, and neither context embeds an answer or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.\",\"evidence\":[\"Reconciliation of the quotation against the intake sheet confirms that Northstar’s offered line is 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and stated production capacity of 1,200 units per week.\",\"Northstar’s supplier record shows its ISO 9001 certification is current, and the corresponding current certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission.\",\"Document control also confirms that the PR-482 submission includes a signed quotation.\",\"Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731.\",\"The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 544 hours, which is at least 500 hours.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 544 hours, which is at least 500 hours."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731.", "negative_left": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731.", "negative_right": "The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 462 hours, which is less than 500 hours.", "right": "The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 544 hours, which is at least 500 hours."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-275-002", "id": "scale-diverse-275-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.", "evidence": ["Reconciliation of the quotation against the intake sheet confirms that Northstar’s offered line is 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and stated production capacity of 1,200 units per week.", "Northstar’s supplier record shows its ISO 9001 certification is current, and the corresponding current certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission.", "Document control also confirms that the PR-482 submission includes a signed quotation.", "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731.", "The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 544 hours, which is at least 500 hours."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original approval policy, request, PR-482 entity, requirements, and routing scope. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes only the ASTM B117 measurement from 544 hours to 462 hours, with no conflicting duplicate measurement, and neither context embeds an answer or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.\",\"evidence\":[\"Reconciliation of the quotation against the intake sheet confirms that Northstar’s offered line is 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and stated production capacity of 1,200 units per week.\",\"Northstar’s supplier record shows its ISO 9001 certification is current, and the corresponding current certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission.\",\"Document control also confirms that the PR-482 submission includes a signed quotation.\",\"Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731.\",\"The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 544 hours, which is at least 500 hours.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 544 hours, which is at least 500 hours."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731.", "negative_left": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731.", "negative_right": "The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 462 hours, which is less than 500 hours.", "right": "The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 544 hours, which is at least 500 hours."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-275-002", "id": "scale-diverse-275-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.", "evidence": ["Reconciliation of the quotation against the intake sheet confirms that Northstar’s offered line is 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and stated production capacity of 1,200 units per week.", "Northstar’s supplier record shows its ISO 9001 certification is current, and the corresponding current certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission.", "Document control also confirms that the PR-482 submission includes a signed quotation.", "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered by Northstar Components for PR-482 is coated exclusively with coating batch CX-731.", "The ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of coating batch CX-731 was measured on 12 August 2026 as 462 hours, which is less than 500 hours."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original procurement requirements, decision scope, supplier, requisition, product, and relevant timing bindings without altering the governing policy. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences linking the offered brackets to coating lot CL-731 and that lot to an ASTM B117 result. The counterfactual coherently changes only the test endurance from 536 to 463 hours, with no conflicting duplicate measurement elsewhere. Neither context includes a gold label, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.\",\"evidence\":[\"The operational handoff identifies Northstar Components’ offer as 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and documented production capacity of 1,200 units per week.\",\"Northstar Components currently holds ISO 9001 certification. Its current ISO 9001 certificate and the signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission.\",\"As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731.\",\"The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 536 hours.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 536 hours."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731.", "negative_left": "As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731.", "negative_right": "The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 463 hours.", "right": "The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 536 hours."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-275-003", "id": "scale-diverse-275-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.", "evidence": ["The operational handoff identifies Northstar Components’ offer as 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and documented production capacity of 1,200 units per week.", "Northstar Components currently holds ISO 9001 certification. Its current ISO 9001 certificate and the signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission.", "As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731.", "The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 536 hours."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original procurement requirements, decision scope, supplier, requisition, product, and relevant timing bindings without altering the governing policy. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences linking the offered brackets to coating lot CL-731 and that lot to an ASTM B117 result. The counterfactual coherently changes only the test endurance from 536 to 463 hours, with no conflicting duplicate measurement elsewhere. Neither context includes a gold label, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.\",\"evidence\":[\"The operational handoff identifies Northstar Components’ offer as 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and documented production capacity of 1,200 units per week.\",\"Northstar Components currently holds ISO 9001 certification. Its current ISO 9001 certificate and the signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission.\",\"As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731.\",\"The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 536 hours.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 536 hours."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731.", "negative_left": "As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731.", "negative_right": "The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 463 hours.", "right": "The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 536 hours."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-275-003", "id": "scale-diverse-275-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.", "evidence": ["The operational handoff identifies Northstar Components’ offer as 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and documented production capacity of 1,200 units per week.", "Northstar Components currently holds ISO 9001 certification. Its current ISO 9001 certificate and the signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission.", "As documented in Northstar Components’ signed PR-482 production handoff dated 2026-08-14, the coating on every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coating lot CL-731.", "The completed ASTM B117 salt-spray test record dated 2026-08-12 gives coating lot CL-731 an endurance of exactly 463 hours."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy and unchanged question scope, entity, procurement request, and timing/threshold bindings. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual coherently changes the ASTM B117 measurement from 537 to 463 hours without creating duplicate or contradictory measurements within either context. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or classifier-output directive.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.\",\"evidence\":[\"The attached, signed quotation offers 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets for $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and stated production capacity of 1,200 units per week.\",\"Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification, and its current certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission.\",\"Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731.\",\"ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 537 hours.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 537 hours."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731.", "negative_left": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731.", "negative_right": "ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 463 hours.", "right": "ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 537 hours."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-275-004", "id": "scale-diverse-275-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.", "evidence": ["The attached, signed quotation offers 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets for $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and stated production capacity of 1,200 units per week.", "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification, and its current certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission.", "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731.", "ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 537 hours."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original governing policy and unchanged question scope, entity, procurement request, and timing/threshold bindings. The two focus-evidence spans are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual coherently changes the ASTM B117 measurement from 537 to 463 hours without creating duplicate or contradictory measurements within either context. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, proposition identifier, rule table, label rationale, or classifier-output directive.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.\",\"evidence\":[\"The attached, signed quotation offers 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets for $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and stated production capacity of 1,200 units per week.\",\"Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification, and its current certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission.\",\"Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731.\",\"ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 537 hours.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 537 hours."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731.", "negative_left": "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731.", "negative_right": "ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 463 hours.", "right": "ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 537 hours."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-275-004", "id": "scale-diverse-275-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.", "evidence": ["The attached, signed quotation offers 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets for $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and stated production capacity of 1,200 units per week.", "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification, and its current certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission.", "Every outdoor control-box bracket offered for PR-482 is coated exclusively with Northstar Components coating batch CB-731.", "ASTM B117 test report TR-926 records the salt-spray endurance of Northstar Components coating batch CB-731 as exactly 463 hours."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both inputs preserve the questions object verbatim and retain the original governing procurement requirements and routing policy. The same PR-482 bid, supplier, products, requirements, request, evidence paths, and relevant dates remain bound to the question. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the reported ASTM B117 failure time from 527 to 463 elapsed hours, which is coherent with the unchanged panel and coating evidence and creates no contradictory duplicate measurement. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"questions\":{\"decision\":{\"criteria\":[\"Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.\",\"Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.\",\"Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval.\"],\"instructions\":\"Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.\",\"type\":\"score\"}},\"state\":{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.\",\"evidence\":[\"On 7 April 2026, Northstar’s signed quotation offered 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets for PR-482 at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and production capacity of 1,200 units weekly.\",\"On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482.\",\"On 9 April 2026, the submission checklist confirmed that Northstar’s current ISO 9001 certificate and the signed quotation were attached to the PR-482 submission.\",\"On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 527 elapsed hours.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["state", "evidence", "1"], "text": "On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482."}, {"path": ["state", "evidence", "3"], "text": "On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 527 elapsed hours."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482.", "negative_left": "On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482.", "negative_right": "On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 463 elapsed hours.", "right": "On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 527 elapsed hours."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-275-005", "id": "scale-diverse-275-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.", "evidence": ["On 7 April 2026, Northstar’s signed quotation offered 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets for PR-482 at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and production capacity of 1,200 units weekly.", "On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482.", "On 9 April 2026, the submission checklist confirmed that Northstar’s current ISO 9001 certificate and the signed quotation were attached to the PR-482 submission.", "On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 527 elapsed hours."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both inputs preserve the questions object verbatim and retain the original governing procurement requirements and routing policy. The same PR-482 bid, supplier, products, requirements, request, evidence paths, and relevant dates remain bound to the question. The two focus spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the reported ASTM B117 failure time from 527 to 463 elapsed hours, which is coherent with the unchanged panel and coating evidence and creates no contradictory duplicate measurement. Neither context includes a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"questions\":{\"decision\":{\"criteria\":[\"Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.\",\"Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.\",\"Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval.\"],\"instructions\":\"Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.\",\"type\":\"score\"}},\"state\":{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.\",\"evidence\":[\"On 7 April 2026, Northstar’s signed quotation offered 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets for PR-482 at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and production capacity of 1,200 units weekly.\",\"On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482.\",\"On 9 April 2026, the submission checklist confirmed that Northstar’s current ISO 9001 certificate and the signed quotation were attached to the PR-482 submission.\",\"On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 527 elapsed hours.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["state", "evidence", "1"], "text": "On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482."}, {"path": ["state", "evidence", "3"], "text": "On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 527 elapsed hours."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482.", "negative_left": "On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482.", "negative_right": "On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 463 elapsed hours.", "right": "On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 527 elapsed hours."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "scale-diverse-275-005", "id": "scale-diverse-275-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner.", "evidence": ["On 7 April 2026, Northstar’s signed quotation offered 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets for PR-482 at $13.60 per unit, with delivery in five weeks and production capacity of 1,200 units weekly.", "On 8 April 2026 at 09:15 UTC, Northstar Components recorded that test panel NX-73 received the same coating in the same application run as the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482.", "On 9 April 2026, the submission checklist confirmed that Northstar’s current ISO 9001 certificate and the signed quotation were attached to the PR-482 submission.", "On 30 April 2026 at 14:40 UTC, the completed ASTM B117 exposure record for test panel NX-73 documented the first coating failure after 463 elapsed hours."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both full contexts preserve the unchanged questions, rubric, request, listing DL-482, and time bindings; the two focus spans are complete factual sentences—“On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.” and “On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable.”—and the counterfactual coherently changes only the documentation observation without contradictory duplicates or answer leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.\",\"On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable.\",\"The compliance attachment for DL-482 confirms the lamp's battery certification and contains no conflicting safety or regulatory claim.\",\"The catalog audit marked every required non-customer-facing field for DL-482 as populated.\",\"The listing remains under review pending the cataloger's severity and routing decision.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "right": "On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable.", "The compliance attachment for DL-482 confirms the lamp's battery certification and contains no conflicting safety or regulatory claim.", "The catalog audit marked every required non-customer-facing field for DL-482 as populated.", "The listing remains under review pending the cataloger's severity and routing decision."], "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both full contexts preserve the unchanged questions, rubric, request, listing DL-482, and time bindings; the two focus spans are complete factual sentences—“On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.” and “On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable.”—and the counterfactual coherently changes only the documentation observation without contradictory duplicates or answer leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.\",\"On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable.\",\"The compliance attachment for DL-482 confirms the lamp's battery certification and contains no conflicting safety or regulatory claim.\",\"The catalog audit marked every required non-customer-facing field for DL-482 as populated.\",\"The listing remains under review pending the cataloger's severity and routing decision.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "right": "On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included no USB-C charging cable."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["On 14 March 2026, the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing DL-482 had exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim: its carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "On 13 March 2026, seller documentation for listing DL-482, packing sheet PS-771, recorded that the carton included one USB-C charging cable.", "The compliance attachment for DL-482 confirms the lamp's battery certification and contains no conflicting safety or regulatory claim.", "The catalog audit marked every required non-customer-facing field for DL-482 as populated.", "The listing remains under review pending the cataloger's severity and routing decision."], "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the policy and bindings, use complete factual evidence, remain coherent despite the changed package record, and contain no embedded answer or classification instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A catalog reviewer examined the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing against the seller’s attachments. The compliance file confirms the battery certification and contains no conflicting safety or regulatory statement. The catalog audit also shows that every required non-customer-facing field has been completed, including the lamp’s battery type, operating duration, and dimensions. The package description and the packing documentation were compared as separate records. The reviewer retained the exact relevant statements below for the package review. No other safety, regulatory, or catalog-field discrepancy was found during this check.\\n\\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter.\",\"The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as excluded from the package.\",\"The compliance attachment confirms the lamp’s battery certification without contradiction.\",\"The catalog audit records every required non-customer-facing field as completed.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as excluded from the package."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter.", "negative_left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter.", "negative_right": "The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as included in the package.", "right": "The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as excluded from the package."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-005", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A catalog reviewer examined the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing against the seller’s attachments. The compliance file confirms the battery certification and contains no conflicting safety or regulatory statement. The catalog audit also shows that every required non-customer-facing field has been completed, including the lamp’s battery type, operating duration, and dimensions. The package description and the packing documentation were compared as separate records. The reviewer retained the exact relevant statements below for the package review. No other safety, regulatory, or catalog-field discrepancy was found during this check.\n\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter.", "The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as excluded from the package.", "The compliance attachment confirms the lamp’s battery certification without contradiction.", "The catalog audit records every required non-customer-facing field as completed."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the policy and bindings, use complete factual evidence, remain coherent despite the changed package record, and contain no embedded answer or classification instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A catalog reviewer examined the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing against the seller’s attachments. The compliance file confirms the battery certification and contains no conflicting safety or regulatory statement. The catalog audit also shows that every required non-customer-facing field has been completed, including the lamp’s battery type, operating duration, and dimensions. The package description and the packing documentation were compared as separate records. The reviewer retained the exact relevant statements below for the package review. No other safety, regulatory, or catalog-field discrepancy was found during this check.\\n\\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter.\",\"The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as excluded from the package.\",\"The compliance attachment confirms the lamp’s battery certification without contradiction.\",\"The catalog audit records every required non-customer-facing field as completed.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as excluded from the package."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter.", "negative_left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter.", "negative_right": "The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as included in the package.", "right": "The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as excluded from the package."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-005", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A catalog reviewer examined the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing against the seller’s attachments. The compliance file confirms the battery certification and contains no conflicting safety or regulatory statement. The catalog audit also shows that every required non-customer-facing field has been completed, including the lamp’s battery type, operating duration, and dimensions. The package description and the packing documentation were compared as separate records. The reviewer retained the exact relevant statements below for the package review. No other safety, regulatory, or catalog-field discrepancy was found during this check.\n\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes a 30-watt USB adapter.", "The seller documentation for that listing records the 30-watt USB adapter as included in the package.", "The compliance attachment confirms the lamp’s battery certification without contradiction.", "The catalog audit records every required non-customer-facing field as completed."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the policy, bindings, complete factual evidence, and coherent changed package-count evidence without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable.\",\"The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains zero USB-C charging cables.\",\"The compliance attachment for the lamp confirms the applicable battery certification, with no safety or regulatory claim conflicting with the seller documentation.\",\"The catalog audit shows that every required non-customer-facing field is populated, including battery type, charging interface, dimensions, and weight.\",\"The seller documentation is signed and dated, and the listing, attachments, and catalog audit refer to the same cordless desk-lamp model.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains zero USB-C charging cables."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains one USB-C charging cable.", "right": "The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains zero USB-C charging cables."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-006", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-006-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains zero USB-C charging cables.", "The compliance attachment for the lamp confirms the applicable battery certification, with no safety or regulatory claim conflicting with the seller documentation.", "The catalog audit shows that every required non-customer-facing field is populated, including battery type, charging interface, dimensions, and weight.", "The seller documentation is signed and dated, and the listing, attachments, and catalog audit refer to the same cordless desk-lamp model."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the policy, bindings, complete factual evidence, and coherent changed package-count evidence without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable.\",\"The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains zero USB-C charging cables.\",\"The compliance attachment for the lamp confirms the applicable battery certification, with no safety or regulatory claim conflicting with the seller documentation.\",\"The catalog audit shows that every required non-customer-facing field is populated, including battery type, charging interface, dimensions, and weight.\",\"The seller documentation is signed and dated, and the listing, attachments, and catalog audit refer to the same cordless desk-lamp model.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains zero USB-C charging cables."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains one USB-C charging cable.", "right": "The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains zero USB-C charging cables."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-006", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-006-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contains exactly one customer-facing package-contents claim, stating that the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "The seller documentation for that listing states in its complete package-contents record that the package contains one USB-C charging cable.", "The compliance attachment for the lamp confirms the applicable battery certification, with no safety or regulatory claim conflicting with the seller documentation.", "The catalog audit shows that every required non-customer-facing field is populated, including battery type, charging interface, dimensions, and weight.", "The seller documentation is signed and dated, and the listing, attachments, and catalog audit refer to the same cordless desk-lamp model."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the policy and bindings, the counterfactual coherently changes the documentation observation without contradiction, and the evidence consists of the complete factual sentences “The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable.” and “The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable.”", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A catalog reviewer examined a seller submission for a cordless desk lamp. The review used the policy below and checked the dated listing against the seller’s signed documentation. The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable. The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable. The compliance attachment confirms that the lamp’s battery certification matches the submitted safety documentation, so no safety or regulatory contradiction was found. The catalog audit also shows that every required non-customer-facing field is populated. A publication decision and routing determination are required.\\n\\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable.", "negative_left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable.", "negative_right": "The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable.", "right": "The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-009", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-009-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A catalog reviewer examined a seller submission for a cordless desk lamp. The review used the policy below and checked the dated listing against the seller’s signed documentation. The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable. The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable. The compliance attachment confirms that the lamp’s battery certification matches the submitted safety documentation, so no safety or regulatory contradiction was found. The catalog audit also shows that every required non-customer-facing field is populated. A publication decision and routing determination are required.\n\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the policy and bindings, the counterfactual coherently changes the documentation observation without contradiction, and the evidence consists of the complete factual sentences “The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable.” and “The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable.”", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A catalog reviewer examined a seller submission for a cordless desk lamp. The review used the policy below and checked the dated listing against the seller’s signed documentation. The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable. The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable. The compliance attachment confirms that the lamp’s battery certification matches the submitted safety documentation, so no safety or regulatory contradiction was found. The catalog audit also shows that every required non-customer-facing field is populated. A publication decision and routing determination are required.\\n\\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable.", "negative_left": "The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable.", "negative_right": "The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable.", "right": "The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and no USB charging cable."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-009", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-009-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A catalog reviewer examined a seller submission for a cordless desk lamp. The review used the policy below and checked the dated listing against the seller’s signed documentation. The submitted cordless desk-lamp listing dated 14 August 2026 states that the complete customer-facing package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable. The seller's signed documentation for that listing, dated 14 August 2026, records that the complete package contents are one lamp and one USB charging cable. The compliance attachment confirms that the lamp’s battery certification matches the submitted safety documentation, so no safety or regulatory contradiction was found. The catalog audit also shows that every required non-customer-facing field is populated. A publication decision and routing determination are required.\n\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing rubric and unchanged question bindings. Each evidence list contains two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual consistently changes only the packing-sheet quantity from none to one cable. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Case note dated 2026-09-17: The marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing for review. The compliance attachment and seller documentation agree on the lamp's battery certification, so no safety or regulatory discrepancy is recorded. The catalog audit confirms that every required non-customer-facing field is populated. The dated listing entry and packing sheet below are the controlling records for the package information.\\n\\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.\",\"In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains no USB-C charging cable.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains no USB-C charging cable."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.", "right": "In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains no USB-C charging cable."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-010", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-010-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Case note dated 2026-09-17: The marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing for review. The compliance attachment and seller documentation agree on the lamp's battery certification, so no safety or regulatory discrepancy is recorded. The catalog audit confirms that every required non-customer-facing field is populated. The dated listing entry and packing sheet below are the controlling records for the package information.\n\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.", "In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains no USB-C charging cable."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing rubric and unchanged question bindings. Each evidence list contains two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual consistently changes only the packing-sheet quantity from none to one cable. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Case note dated 2026-09-17: The marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing for review. The compliance attachment and seller documentation agree on the lamp's battery certification, so no safety or regulatory discrepancy is recorded. The catalog audit confirms that every required non-customer-facing field is populated. The dated listing entry and packing sheet below are the controlling records for the package information.\\n\\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.\",\"In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains no USB-C charging cable.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains no USB-C charging cable."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.", "right": "In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains no USB-C charging cable."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-007-010", "id": "fast-41-diverse-007-010-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Case note dated 2026-09-17: The marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing for review. The compliance attachment and seller documentation agree on the lamp's battery certification, so no safety or regulatory discrepancy is recorded. The catalog audit confirms that every required non-customer-facing field is populated. The dated listing entry and packing sheet below are the controlling records for the package information.\n\nA marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["In the submitted 2026-09-17 cordless desk-lamp listing, the customer-facing package-contents field states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable.", "In the seller's documentation for that same listing, the 2026-09-16 packing sheet states that the box contains one USB-C charging cable."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the complete governing rubric, while both contexts retain the same listing, field, and current-state bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences and preserve the required exact quotes. Atlas submitting the listing and Meridian alone providing conditional authorization are compatible changed observations. Neither context states a gold result, code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Case note\",\"text\":\"The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted by seller Meridian Foods.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Case note\",\"text\":\"Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"Capacity is a required core field for this listing and is used by search filters.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"The manufacturer documentation supports two distinct Capacity candidates: rated vessel volume of 1.7 L and recommended working fill of 1.5 L.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"The Capacity field is conflicting because the category guide does not resolve whether Capacity means rated vessel volume or recommended working fill.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Compliance reviewer\",\"text\":\"The supplied documentation does not directly disprove any safety or regulatory claim.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"For every field other than Capacity in the current listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Case note\",\"text\":\"The listing remains unpublished pending controlled-field interpretation.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted by seller Meridian Foods."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted by seller Meridian Foods.", "negative_left": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted solely by seller Atlas Foods.", "negative_right": "Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition.", "right": "Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-008-009", "id": "fast-41-diverse-008-009-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Case note", "text": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted by seller Meridian Foods."}, {"speaker": "Case note", "text": "Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "Capacity is a required core field for this listing and is used by search filters."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "The manufacturer documentation supports two distinct Capacity candidates: rated vessel volume of 1.7 L and recommended working fill of 1.5 L."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "The Capacity field is conflicting because the category guide does not resolve whether Capacity means rated vessel volume or recommended working fill."}, {"speaker": "Compliance reviewer", "text": "The supplied documentation does not directly disprove any safety or regulatory claim."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "For every field other than Capacity in the current listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}, {"speaker": "Case note", "text": "The listing remains unpublished pending controlled-field interpretation."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_specialist_review_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the complete governing rubric, while both contexts retain the same listing, field, and current-state bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences and preserve the required exact quotes. Atlas submitting the listing and Meridian alone providing conditional authorization are compatible changed observations. Neither context states a gold result, code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Case note\",\"text\":\"The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted by seller Meridian Foods.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Case note\",\"text\":\"Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"Capacity is a required core field for this listing and is used by search filters.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"The manufacturer documentation supports two distinct Capacity candidates: rated vessel volume of 1.7 L and recommended working fill of 1.5 L.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"The Capacity field is conflicting because the category guide does not resolve whether Capacity means rated vessel volume or recommended working fill.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Compliance reviewer\",\"text\":\"The supplied documentation does not directly disprove any safety or regulatory claim.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"For every field other than Capacity in the current listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Case note\",\"text\":\"The listing remains unpublished pending controlled-field interpretation.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted by seller Meridian Foods."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted by seller Meridian Foods.", "negative_left": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted solely by seller Atlas Foods.", "negative_right": "Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition.", "right": "Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-008-009", "id": "fast-41-diverse-008-009-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Case note", "text": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing was submitted solely by seller Atlas Foods."}, {"speaker": "Case note", "text": "Meridian Foods is the only seller that conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value matching the applicable category definition."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "Capacity is a required core field for this listing and is used by search filters."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "The manufacturer documentation supports two distinct Capacity candidates: rated vessel volume of 1.7 L and recommended working fill of 1.5 L."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "The Capacity field is conflicting because the category guide does not resolve whether Capacity means rated vessel volume or recommended working fill."}, {"speaker": "Compliance reviewer", "text": "The supplied documentation does not directly disprove any safety or regulatory claim."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "For every field other than Capacity in the current listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}, {"speaker": "Case note", "text": "The listing remains unpublished pending controlled-field interpretation."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy, and both contexts retain the Northstar Soup Maker and Capacity bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences: “The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value.” and “The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate.” The counterfactual changes only the seller’s authorization and remains consistent with the assessment that 4 liters matches the category definition. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"The current Northstar Soup Maker listing has no supplied documentation that directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"Capacity is a required core field for this listing and is used in filtering. The field is conflicting because the submitted materials support two distinct candidate values, 4 liters and 7 liters.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"The category guide does not settle whether Capacity means the rated vessel measurement or the applicable working measurement, so the category definition remains unresolved. Every other field has evidence supporting at most one candidate value.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Marketplace seller\",\"text\":\"The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Category assessment record\",\"text\":\"The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Marketplace support agent\",\"text\":\"The listing remains unpublished while the controlled Capacity interpretation is reviewed by a category specialist.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value."}, {"path": ["4", "text"], "text": "The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value.", "negative_left": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes only the 7-liter candidate Capacity value.", "negative_right": "The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate.", "right": "The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-008-011", "id": "fast-41-diverse-008-011-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing has no supplied documentation that directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "Capacity is a required core field for this listing and is used in filtering. The field is conflicting because the submitted materials support two distinct candidate values, 4 liters and 7 liters."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "The category guide does not settle whether Capacity means the rated vessel measurement or the applicable working measurement, so the category definition remains unresolved. Every other field has evidence supporting at most one candidate value."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace seller", "text": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value."}, {"speaker": "Category assessment record", "text": "The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace support agent", "text": "The listing remains unpublished while the controlled Capacity interpretation is reviewed by a category specialist."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_specialist_review_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy, and both contexts retain the Northstar Soup Maker and Capacity bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences: “The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value.” and “The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate.” The counterfactual changes only the seller’s authorization and remains consistent with the assessment that 4 liters matches the category definition. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"The current Northstar Soup Maker listing has no supplied documentation that directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"Capacity is a required core field for this listing and is used in filtering. The field is conflicting because the submitted materials support two distinct candidate values, 4 liters and 7 liters.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Catalog reviewer\",\"text\":\"The category guide does not settle whether Capacity means the rated vessel measurement or the applicable working measurement, so the category definition remains unresolved. Every other field has evidence supporting at most one candidate value.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Marketplace seller\",\"text\":\"The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Category assessment record\",\"text\":\"The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Marketplace support agent\",\"text\":\"The listing remains unpublished while the controlled Capacity interpretation is reviewed by a category specialist.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value."}, {"path": ["4", "text"], "text": "The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the 4-liter candidate Capacity value.", "negative_left": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes only the 7-liter candidate Capacity value.", "negative_right": "The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate.", "right": "The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-008-011", "id": "fast-41-diverse-008-011-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "The current Northstar Soup Maker listing has no supplied documentation that directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "Capacity is a required core field for this listing and is used in filtering. The field is conflicting because the submitted materials support two distinct candidate values, 4 liters and 7 liters."}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "The category guide does not settle whether Capacity means the rated vessel measurement or the applicable working measurement, so the category definition remains unresolved. Every other field has evidence supporting at most one candidate value."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace seller", "text": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes only the 7-liter candidate Capacity value."}, {"speaker": "Category assessment record", "text": "The applicable category definition identifies 4 liters as the matching candidate Capacity value, and the listing contains a distinct 7-liter candidate."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace support agent", "text": "The listing remains unpublished while the controlled Capacity interpretation is reviewed by a category specialist."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved because the unchanged questions and both contexts retain it. Question bindings remain tied to the insulated-bottle listing, latest attachment, Wednesday review, and publication decision. Evidence spans are complete factual sentences: \"At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" and \"At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" The counterfactual coherently changes only the attachment dimensions to 24 by 8 centimeters, creating a source inconsistency without contradictory duplicate assertions. Neither context embeds an answer or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"Wednesday catalog review case note: The marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing identifies a capacity of 750 mL and stainless-steel material. The seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer identifies the same capacity and material. The reviewer treats that attachment as the current documentation for this review. At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The listing and attachment concern the same insulated-bottle product, and no identity or prohibited-item concern is recorded. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_left": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_right": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 8 centimeters.", "right": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Wednesday catalog review case note: The marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing identifies a capacity of 750 mL and stainless-steel material. The seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer identifies the same capacity and material. The reviewer treats that attachment as the current documentation for this review. At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The listing and attachment concern the same insulated-bottle product, and no identity or prohibited-item concern is recorded. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved because the unchanged questions and both contexts retain it. Question bindings remain tied to the insulated-bottle listing, latest attachment, Wednesday review, and publication decision. Evidence spans are complete factual sentences: \"At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" and \"At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" The counterfactual coherently changes only the attachment dimensions to 24 by 8 centimeters, creating a source inconsistency without contradictory duplicate assertions. Neither context embeds an answer or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"Wednesday catalog review case note: The marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing identifies a capacity of 750 mL and stainless-steel material. The seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer identifies the same capacity and material. The reviewer treats that attachment as the current documentation for this review. At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The listing and attachment concern the same insulated-bottle product, and no identity or prohibited-item concern is recorded. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_left": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_right": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 8 centimeters.", "right": "At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Wednesday catalog review case note: The marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing identifies a capacity of 750 mL and stainless-steel material. The seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer identifies the same capacity and material. The reviewer treats that attachment as the current documentation for this review. At the Wednesday catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing gives its dimensions as 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. At the Wednesday catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer gives the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24 centimeters by 8 centimeters. The listing and attachment concern the same insulated-bottle product, and no identity or prohibited-item concern is recorded. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The evidence quotes are \"At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm.\" and \"At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm.\"; both are complete factual sentences, and the contexts preserve the policy, bindings, and coherent measurements without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: On Wednesday, a catalog reviewer examined the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest available attachment. The listing identified capacity as 750 mL and material as stainless steel. The latest attachment also identified capacity as 750 mL and material as stainless steel. At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm. At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm. The reviewer treated the attachment available that day as the current seller documentation. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm."}, {"path": [], "text": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm.", "negative_left": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm.", "negative_right": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.4 cm.", "right": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-002", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case note: On Wednesday, a catalog reviewer examined the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest available attachment. The listing identified capacity as 750 mL and material as stainless steel. The latest attachment also identified capacity as 750 mL and material as stainless steel. At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm. At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm. The reviewer treated the attachment available that day as the current seller documentation. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The evidence quotes are \"At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm.\" and \"At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm.\"; both are complete factual sentences, and the contexts preserve the policy, bindings, and coherent measurements without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: On Wednesday, a catalog reviewer examined the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest available attachment. The listing identified capacity as 750 mL and material as stainless steel. The latest attachment also identified capacity as 750 mL and material as stainless steel. At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm. At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm. The reviewer treated the attachment available that day as the current seller documentation. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm."}, {"path": [], "text": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm.", "negative_left": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm.", "negative_right": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.4 cm.", "right": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-002", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case note: On Wednesday, a catalog reviewer examined the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest available attachment. The listing identified capacity as 750 mL and material as stainless steel. The latest attachment also identified capacity as 750 mL and material as stainless steel. At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.6 cm by 7.1 cm. At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded the insulated bottle's dimensions as 24.6 cm by 7.4 cm. The reviewer treated the attachment available that day as the current seller documentation. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions object preserves the governing policy and decision criteria. Both contexts retain the insulated-bottle listing, Wednesday review, and latest-attachment bindings. Both evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the latest attachment’s dimensions without creating contradictory duplicate claims. Neither context embeds a gold answer, label code, rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"On Wednesday, a catalog reviewer examined a marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest available attachment. The listing specified 750 mL capacity and stainless-steel material; the latest attachment specified 750 mL and stainless-steel material as well. The earlier attachment had been superseded by a signed datasheet received Tuesday. At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm. At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm."}, {"path": [], "text": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm.", "negative_left": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm.", "negative_right": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 8.1 cm.", "right": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "On Wednesday, a catalog reviewer examined a marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest available attachment. The listing specified 750 mL capacity and stainless-steel material; the latest attachment specified 750 mL and stainless-steel material as well. The earlier attachment had been superseded by a signed datasheet received Tuesday. At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm. At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions object preserves the governing policy and decision criteria. Both contexts retain the insulated-bottle listing, Wednesday review, and latest-attachment bindings. Both evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the latest attachment’s dimensions without creating contradictory duplicate claims. Neither context embeds a gold answer, label code, rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"On Wednesday, a catalog reviewer examined a marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest available attachment. The listing specified 750 mL capacity and stainless-steel material; the latest attachment specified 750 mL and stainless-steel material as well. The earlier attachment had been superseded by a signed datasheet received Tuesday. At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm. At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm."}, {"path": [], "text": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm.", "negative_left": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm.", "negative_right": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 8.1 cm.", "right": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "On Wednesday, a catalog reviewer examined a marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest available attachment. The listing specified 750 mL capacity and stainless-steel material; the latest attachment specified 750 mL and stainless-steel material as well. The earlier attachment had been superseded by a signed datasheet received Tuesday. At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 7.5 cm. At Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer recorded dimensions of 24.0 cm by 8.1 cm. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy and decision criteria, and both contexts retain that policy. The listing, latest-attachment, Wednesday-review, and publication-readiness bindings remain unchanged. The evidence consists of exactly two complete factual sentences: \"As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" \"As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" The counterfactual coherently changes only the latest attachment's dimensions from 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters to 28 centimeters by 7 centimeters. No contradictory duplicate measurement appears because the differing dimensions describe separate records. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"The Wednesday catalog review concerns a marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer. The reviewer treats the latest attachment as the controlling record and does not use superseded submissions. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The review covers the required catalog fields for publication, and the seller and product identity are unchanged between the two records. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 28 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-004", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "The Wednesday catalog review concerns a marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer. The reviewer treats the latest attachment as the controlling record and does not use superseded submissions. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The review covers the required catalog fields for publication, and the seller and product identity are unchanged between the two records. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy and decision criteria, and both contexts retain that policy. The listing, latest-attachment, Wednesday-review, and publication-readiness bindings remain unchanged. The evidence consists of exactly two complete factual sentences: \"As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" \"As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" The counterfactual coherently changes only the latest attachment's dimensions from 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters to 28 centimeters by 7 centimeters. No contradictory duplicate measurement appears because the differing dimensions describe separate records. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"The Wednesday catalog review concerns a marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer. The reviewer treats the latest attachment as the controlling record and does not use superseded submissions. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The review covers the required catalog fields for publication, and the seller and product identity are unchanged between the two records. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 28 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-004", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "The Wednesday catalog review concerns a marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer. The reviewer treats the latest attachment as the controlling record and does not use superseded submissions. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows a capacity of 740 milliliters, a material of stainless steel, and dimensions of 28 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The review covers the required catalog fields for publication, and the seller and product identity are unchanged between the two records. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy and decision criteria. Both contexts retain the marketplace seller, insulated-bottle listing, Wednesday review, and latest-attachment bindings. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: \"As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter.\" \"As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter.\" The counterfactual coherently changes only the attachment dimensions, creating a required-field inconsistency without contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and latest available attachment were compared. The capacity entries agree, and the material entries agree; the latest attachment is signed and available to the reviewer. No identity or prohibited-item concern was recorded, and no typographical issue was found in the capacity or material entries. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter.", "negative_left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter.", "negative_right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 31 centimeters in height and 8 centimeters in diameter.", "right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-005", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and latest available attachment were compared. The capacity entries agree, and the material entries agree; the latest attachment is signed and available to the reviewer. No identity or prohibited-item concern was recorded, and no typographical issue was found in the capacity or material entries. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy and decision criteria. Both contexts retain the marketplace seller, insulated-bottle listing, Wednesday review, and latest-attachment bindings. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: \"As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter.\" \"As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter.\" The counterfactual coherently changes only the attachment dimensions, creating a required-field inconsistency without contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and latest available attachment were compared. The capacity entries agree, and the material entries agree; the latest attachment is signed and available to the reviewer. No identity or prohibited-item concern was recorded, and no typographical issue was found in the capacity or material entries. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter.", "negative_left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter.", "negative_right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 31 centimeters in height and 8 centimeters in diameter.", "right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-005", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing and latest available attachment were compared. The capacity entries agree, and the material entries agree; the latest attachment is signed and available to the reviewer. No identity or prohibited-item concern was recorded, and no typographical issue was found in the capacity or material entries. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters in height and 7 centimeters in diameter. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows the insulated bottle as 31 centimeters in height and 8 centimeters in diameter. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The evidence consists of the exact factual sentences “As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.” and “As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.”; the counterfactual coherently changes only the latest documented dimensions, creating a source inconsistency without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"The catalog reviewer assessed a marketplace seller’s insulated-bottle listing on Wednesday using the seller’s latest available attachment as controlling documentation. The listing states a capacity of 750 mL and stainless-steel material, and the latest signed datasheet gives the same capacity and material. An earlier specification sheet had shown a different capacity, but it is not controlling. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The listing is being assessed for publication after the Wednesday review. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 33 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-007", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-007-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "The catalog reviewer assessed a marketplace seller’s insulated-bottle listing on Wednesday using the seller’s latest available attachment as controlling documentation. The listing states a capacity of 750 mL and stainless-steel material, and the latest signed datasheet gives the same capacity and material. An earlier specification sheet had shown a different capacity, but it is not controlling. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The listing is being assessed for publication after the Wednesday review. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The evidence consists of the exact factual sentences “As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.” and “As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.”; the counterfactual coherently changes only the latest documented dimensions, creating a source inconsistency without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"The catalog reviewer assessed a marketplace seller’s insulated-bottle listing on Wednesday using the seller’s latest available attachment as controlling documentation. The listing states a capacity of 750 mL and stainless-steel material, and the latest signed datasheet gives the same capacity and material. An earlier specification sheet had shown a different capacity, but it is not controlling. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The listing is being assessed for publication after the Wednesday review. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_left": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 33 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "right": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-007", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-007-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "The catalog reviewer assessed a marketplace seller’s insulated-bottle listing on Wednesday using the seller’s latest available attachment as controlling documentation. The listing states a capacity of 750 mL and stainless-steel material, and the latest signed datasheet gives the same capacity and material. An earlier specification sheet had shown a different capacity, but it is not controlling. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 32 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer lists the insulated-bottle dimensions as 33 centimeters by 9 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The listing is being assessed for publication after the Wednesday review. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged policy, listing scope, latest-documentation rule, and Wednesday review binding. The evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences: \"As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" and \"As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" The counterfactual changes only the latest attachment's dimensions and creates one required-field mismatch without contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"Wednesday catalog review: The marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing identifies a 750 mL capacity and stainless-steel construction. The seller's latest signed datasheet, received Tuesday and available to the catalog reviewer, identifies 750 mL and stainless steel. As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The reviewer uses the latest available attachment rather than the earlier specification sheet. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_left": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_right": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "right": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-008", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-008-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Wednesday catalog review: The marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing identifies a 750 mL capacity and stainless-steel construction. The seller's latest signed datasheet, received Tuesday and available to the catalog reviewer, identifies 750 mL and stainless steel. As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The reviewer uses the latest available attachment rather than the earlier specification sheet. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged policy, listing scope, latest-documentation rule, and Wednesday review binding. The evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences: \"As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" and \"As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.\" The counterfactual changes only the latest attachment's dimensions and creates one required-field mismatch without contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "supported", "material_match": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"capacity_match": "supported", "dimensions_match": "refuted", "material_match": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"dimensions_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"dimensions_match": "supported"}, "right": {"dimensions_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses one factual field-to-document match relationship. The focus is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable and differ only in the dimensions match. The policy evidence preserves the state-originating rules needed to interpret the unchanged question, including latest-attachment precedence and the set of required fields. Both rules are sufficient for their targets, and uncovered assignments may validly abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that every required field—capacity, material, and dimensions—matches the latest attachment, which is sufficient for publication-readiness.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A refuted dimensions-match atom establishes a conflict in a required field with the latest attachment. That alone is sufficient for the false outcome, while the other supported atoms exclude conflicts in the remaining required fields.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "capacity_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the capacity shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the capacity shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "material_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the material shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing matches the material shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}, {"id": "dimensions_match", "statement": "As of the catalog review on Wednesday, the dimensions shown in the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing match the dimensions shown in the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer."}], "base_state_json": "\"Wednesday catalog review: The marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing identifies a 750 mL capacity and stainless-steel construction. The seller's latest signed datasheet, received Tuesday and available to the catalog reviewer, identifies 750 mL and stainless steel. As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The reviewer uses the latest available attachment rather than the earlier specification sheet. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "dimensions_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, {"path": [], "text": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All three required listing fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—match the latest seller attachment controlling at the Wednesday review.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The required dimensions field conflicts with the latest seller attachment, so the listing is not publication-ready even though capacity and material match.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "capacity_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "material_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "dimensions_match", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_left": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "negative_right": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters.", "right": "As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-009-008", "id": "fast-41-diverse-009-008-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required listing field conflicts with the latest seller documentation, so correction or specialist review is required.", "true": "Yes — all required listing fields match the latest seller documentation, so the listing is publication-ready."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the listing is publication-ready under the supplied policy, using the latest attachment as the controlling evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Wednesday catalog review: The marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing identifies a 750 mL capacity and stainless-steel construction. The seller's latest signed datasheet, received Tuesday and available to the catalog reviewer, identifies 750 mL and stainless steel. As of Wednesday's catalog review, the marketplace seller's insulated-bottle listing shows dimensions of 24 centimeters by 7 centimeters. As of Wednesday's catalog review, the seller's latest attachment available to the catalog reviewer shows dimensions of 26 centimeters by 7 centimeters. The reviewer uses the latest available attachment rather than the earlier specification sheet. Policy says the latest attachment supersedes earlier versions. Publication requires all required fields—capacity, material, and dimensions—to match the latest documentation. Severity ranks: critical for identity or prohibited-item issues, major for a required-field inconsistency, minor for typos, and none for no defect. Major defects route to seller correction; critical defects route to a category specialist."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-009", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "6fea51ef88defaed1d017d55cfab25e836929d1515f5dea0c961a5fef0fabbee", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved because the unchanged original questions and both contexts retain the governing triage rules. Entity, request, and date bindings remain consistent for the Voltara VT-K7 listing and specialist-routing question. Base evidence consists of the exact factual sentences \"As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.\" and \"As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7.\" Counterfactual evidence consists of the exact factual sentences \"As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.\" and \"As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.\" The counterfactual removes the voltage conflict without creating contradictory duplicate assertions, and neither context embeds a gold answer or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; A3 is a permissible universal claim over the explicit set of other applicable requirements. A1 is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only A1 changing. The policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating rules concerning unresolved voltage conflicts, unsupported seller statements, specialist routing, and publication blocking; the unchanged questions object automatically preserves the decision instructions and outcome criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails conflicting voltage specifications among seller documents, while refuted A2 entails that the supplied evidence does not establish reconciliation. This is an unresolved voltage conflict, which the policy expressly makes a publication-blocking Blocker requiring specialist routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuted A1 excludes disagreement among the supplied seller documents about voltage, and supported A3 establishes satisfaction of every other applicable listing requirement. Together they exclude both the specified voltage-conflict trigger and any other unmet requirement, so the negative outcome is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Among all seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, at least two specify different voltage ranges for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At least one item of supplied evidence establishes a reconciliation of a voltage difference among the seller documents for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "Every marketplace listing requirement applicable to the Voltara VT-K7 listing other than agreement among seller documents about voltage is satisfied."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Case note for the Voltara VT-K7 marketplace listing, reviewed 2026-09-17. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication. The document-review log contains no reconciliation record for the voltage entries. The intake checklist marks every applicable listing requirement other than agreement among seller documents about voltage as satisfied. Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?\",\"evidence\":[\"As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.\",\"As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Blockers prevent publication."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}], "rules": [{"justification": "A voltage difference exists among the supplied seller documents, and the supplied evidence does not establish a reconciliation. The conflict is therefore unresolved; the policy classifies it as a Blocker requiring category-specialist routing and preventing publication.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "No two supplied seller documents disagree about voltage, and every other applicable listing requirement is satisfied. Thus there is neither an unresolved seller-document voltage conflict nor another unmet requirement requiring specialist review or blocking publication.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.", "negative_left": "As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.", "negative_right": "As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.", "right": "As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-010-004", "id": "fast-41-diverse-010-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not require specialist review; treat the listing as ready or eligible for ordinary correction.", "true": "Yes — route the listing to a category specialist and block publication pending resolution."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated triage policy to the supplied evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Case note for the Voltara VT-K7 marketplace listing, reviewed 2026-09-17. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication. The document-review log contains no reconciliation record for the voltage entries. The intake checklist marks every applicable listing requirement other than agreement among seller documents about voltage as satisfied. Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?", "evidence": ["As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.", "As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-010", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "05d88156f46298a27351272f508360cbdc7108bb28cfd12a25195bd9e3311442", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved because the unchanged original questions and both contexts retain the governing triage rules. Entity, request, and date bindings remain consistent for the Voltara VT-K7 listing and specialist-routing question. Base evidence consists of the exact factual sentences \"As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.\" and \"As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7.\" Counterfactual evidence consists of the exact factual sentences \"As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.\" and \"As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.\" The counterfactual removes the voltage conflict without creating contradictory duplicate assertions, and neither context embeds a gold answer or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; A3 is a permissible universal claim over the explicit set of other applicable requirements. A1 is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only A1 changing. The policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating rules concerning unresolved voltage conflicts, unsupported seller statements, specialist routing, and publication blocking; the unchanged questions object automatically preserves the decision instructions and outcome criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails conflicting voltage specifications among seller documents, while refuted A2 entails that the supplied evidence does not establish reconciliation. This is an unresolved voltage conflict, which the policy expressly makes a publication-blocking Blocker requiring specialist routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuted A1 excludes disagreement among the supplied seller documents about voltage, and supported A3 establishes satisfaction of every other applicable listing requirement. Together they exclude both the specified voltage-conflict trigger and any other unmet requirement, so the negative outcome is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Among all seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, at least two specify different voltage ranges for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At least one item of supplied evidence establishes a reconciliation of a voltage difference among the seller documents for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "Every marketplace listing requirement applicable to the Voltara VT-K7 listing other than agreement among seller documents about voltage is satisfied."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Case note for the Voltara VT-K7 marketplace listing, reviewed 2026-09-17. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication. The document-review log contains no reconciliation record for the voltage entries. The intake checklist marks every applicable listing requirement other than agreement among seller documents about voltage as satisfied. Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?\",\"evidence\":[\"As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.\",\"As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Blockers prevent publication."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}], "rules": [{"justification": "A voltage difference exists among the supplied seller documents, and the supplied evidence does not establish a reconciliation. The conflict is therefore unresolved; the policy classifies it as a Blocker requiring category-specialist routing and preventing publication.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "No two supplied seller documents disagree about voltage, and every other applicable listing requirement is satisfied. Thus there is neither an unresolved seller-document voltage conflict nor another unmet requirement requiring specialist review or blocking publication.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.", "negative_left": "As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.", "negative_right": "As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.", "right": "As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 220–240 volts for model VT-K7."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-010-004", "id": "fast-41-diverse-010-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not require specialist review; treat the listing as ready or eligible for ordinary correction.", "true": "Yes — route the listing to a category specialist and block publication pending resolution."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated triage policy to the supplied evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Case note for the Voltara VT-K7 marketplace listing, reviewed 2026-09-17. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication. The document-review log contains no reconciliation record for the voltage entries. The intake checklist marks every applicable listing requirement other than agreement among seller documents about voltage as satisfied. Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?", "evidence": ["As of 2026-09-17, the complete set of seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing consists exactly of documents SD-14 and SD-27, and SD-14 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7.", "As of 2026-09-17, seller document SD-27 specifies a voltage range of 110–120 volts for model VT-K7."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-010", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "05d88156f46298a27351272f508360cbdc7108bb28cfd12a25195bd9e3311442", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The timestamps remain coherent and preserve the required evidence: “Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.” and “Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026.”", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"The latest pre-09:00 projector report records that the projector passed its startup test.\",\"The latest pre-09:00 desk report records 24 desks.\",\"The latest pre-09:00 exit report records an unobstructed exit.\",\"The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists of R-C and R-D, and both concern the required camera.\",\"Report R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.\",\"Report R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.\",\"The two camera-report timestamps are unequal.\",\"Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.\",\"Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026.\",\"No equipment repair task, room or safety task, or unrelated setup task remains before 09:00. No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before the lesson.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "7"], "text": "Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "8"], "text": "Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was timestamped after 08:45 and before 09:00 on 17 September 2026.", "right": "Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-079-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-079-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["The latest pre-09:00 projector report records that the projector passed its startup test.", "The latest pre-09:00 desk report records 24 desks.", "The latest pre-09:00 exit report records an unobstructed exit.", "The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists of R-C and R-D, and both concern the required camera.", "Report R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.", "Report R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.", "The two camera-report timestamps are unequal.", "Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.", "Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026.", "No equipment repair task, room or safety task, or unrelated setup task remains before 09:00. No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before the lesson."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The timestamps remain coherent and preserve the required evidence: “Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.” and “Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026.”", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"The latest pre-09:00 projector report records that the projector passed its startup test.\",\"The latest pre-09:00 desk report records 24 desks.\",\"The latest pre-09:00 exit report records an unobstructed exit.\",\"The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists of R-C and R-D, and both concern the required camera.\",\"Report R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.\",\"Report R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.\",\"The two camera-report timestamps are unequal.\",\"Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.\",\"Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026.\",\"No equipment repair task, room or safety task, or unrelated setup task remains before 09:00. No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before the lesson.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "7"], "text": "Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "8"], "text": "Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was timestamped after 08:45 and before 09:00 on 17 September 2026.", "right": "Report R-D was timestamped before 08:00 on 17 September 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-079-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-079-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["The latest pre-09:00 projector report records that the projector passed its startup test.", "The latest pre-09:00 desk report records 24 desks.", "The latest pre-09:00 exit report records an unobstructed exit.", "The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists of R-C and R-D, and both concern the required camera.", "Report R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.", "Report R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.", "The two camera-report timestamps are unequal.", "Report R-C was timestamped after 08:30 and before 08:40 on 17 September 2026.", "Report R-D was timestamped after 08:45 and before 09:00 on 17 September 2026.", "No equipment repair task, room or safety task, or unrelated setup task remains before 09:00. No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before the lesson."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged policy and bindings; each focus contains the exact factual sentences “Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.” and “Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026.” or “Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:35 on 17 September 2026.”; the changed timestamp coherently changes which report is latest without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"The latest pre-09:00 projector report records a successful startup test, the latest desk report records 24 desks, and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.\",\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026.\",\"The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists only of R-C and R-D, and both reports concern the camera required for the lesson.\",\"R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.\",\"R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.\",\"Before 09:00, no equipment repair, room or safety task, unrelated setup task, or non-routine camera setup task remains.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:35 on 17 September 2026.", "right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-079-011", "id": "fast-41-diverse-079-011-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["The latest pre-09:00 projector report records a successful startup test, the latest desk report records 24 desks, and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.", "Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026.", "The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists only of R-C and R-D, and both reports concern the camera required for the lesson.", "R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.", "R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.", "Before 09:00, no equipment repair, room or safety task, unrelated setup task, or non-routine camera setup task remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged policy and bindings; each focus contains the exact factual sentences “Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.” and “Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026.” or “Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:35 on 17 September 2026.”; the changed timestamp coherently changes which report is latest without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"The latest pre-09:00 projector report records a successful startup test, the latest desk report records 24 desks, and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.\",\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026.\",\"The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists only of R-C and R-D, and both reports concern the camera required for the lesson.\",\"R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.\",\"R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.\",\"Before 09:00, no equipment repair, room or safety task, unrelated setup task, or non-routine camera setup task remains.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:35 on 17 September 2026.", "right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:27 on 17 September 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-079-011", "id": "fast-41-diverse-079-011-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["The latest pre-09:00 projector report records a successful startup test, the latest desk report records 24 desks, and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.", "Report R-C bears the timestamp 14:32 on 17 September 2026.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 14:35 on 17 September 2026.", "The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists only of R-C and R-D, and both reports concern the camera required for the lesson.", "R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.", "R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.", "Before 09:00, no equipment repair, room or safety task, unrelated setup task, or non-routine camera setup task remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing policy, question bindings, complete factual evidence, and unchanged request; the counterfactual changes only R-C’s timestamp, leaving R-D as the latest report without contradictory duplicate assertions or embedded answer guidance.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"The latest projector report before 09:00 records that the required projector passed its startup test.\",\"The latest desk report before 09:00 records 24 desks, and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.\",\"The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists of R-C and R-D, and both reports concern the camera required for the lesson.\",\"Report R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.\",\"Report R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.\",\"On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC.\",\"On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:52 UTC.\",\"No equipment repair, room, or safety task remains before 09:00. No setup task unrelated to the camera remains, and no non-routine camera setup task remains.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC."}, {"path": ["evidence", "6"], "text": "On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:52 UTC."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC.", "negative_left": "On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC.", "negative_right": "On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:42 UTC.", "right": "On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:52 UTC."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-079-012", "id": "fast-41-diverse-079-012-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["The latest projector report before 09:00 records that the required projector passed its startup test.", "The latest desk report before 09:00 records 24 desks, and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.", "The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists of R-C and R-D, and both reports concern the camera required for the lesson.", "Report R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.", "Report R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.", "On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC.", "On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:52 UTC.", "No equipment repair, room, or safety task remains before 09:00. No setup task unrelated to the camera remains, and no non-routine camera setup task remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing policy, question bindings, complete factual evidence, and unchanged request; the counterfactual changes only R-C’s timestamp, leaving R-D as the latest report without contradictory duplicate assertions or embedded answer guidance.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"The latest projector report before 09:00 records that the required projector passed its startup test.\",\"The latest desk report before 09:00 records 24 desks, and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.\",\"The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists of R-C and R-D, and both reports concern the camera required for the lesson.\",\"Report R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.\",\"Report R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.\",\"On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC.\",\"On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:52 UTC.\",\"No equipment repair, room, or safety task remains before 09:00. No setup task unrelated to the camera remains, and no non-routine camera setup task remains.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC."}, {"path": ["evidence", "6"], "text": "On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:52 UTC."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC.", "negative_left": "On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC.", "negative_right": "On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:42 UTC.", "right": "On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:52 UTC."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-079-012", "id": "fast-41-diverse-079-012-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["The latest projector report before 09:00 records that the required projector passed its startup test.", "The latest desk report before 09:00 records 24 desks, and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.", "The complete pre-09:00 document-camera report set consists of R-C and R-D, and both reports concern the camera required for the lesson.", "Report R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup.", "Report R-D records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.", "On 17 September 2026, report R-D for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:47 UTC.", "On 17 September 2026, report R-C for the 09:00 microscopy lesson bears the timestamp 08:42 UTC.", "No equipment repair, room, or safety task remains before 09:00. No setup task unrelated to the camera remains, and no non-routine camera setup task remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy and question bindings remain unchanged in both full inputs. The base context coherently makes R-C the latest report, while the counterfactual coherently makes R-D the latest report. The focus evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences: \"Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.\" and \"Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026.\" The counterfactual changes only R-D's timestamp and creates no contradictory duplicate measurement or assertion. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rule table, rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026.\",\"R-C and R-D are the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera. R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup. R-D records that it is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.\",\"The latest pre-09:00 projector report records a passed startup test; the latest desk report records 24 desks; and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.\",\"Before 09:00, no equipment repair, room or safety task, unrelated setup task, or non-routine setup task for the lesson remains.\"] ,\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:52 on 17 May 2026.", "right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-079-015", "id": "fast-41-diverse-079-015-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026.", "R-C and R-D are the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera. R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup. R-D records that it is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.", "The latest pre-09:00 projector report records a passed startup test; the latest desk report records 24 desks; and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.", "Before 09:00, no equipment repair, room or safety task, unrelated setup task, or non-routine setup task for the lesson remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy and question bindings remain unchanged in both full inputs. The base context coherently makes R-C the latest report, while the counterfactual coherently makes R-D the latest report. The focus evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences: \"Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.\" and \"Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026.\" The counterfactual changes only R-D's timestamp and creates no contradictory duplicate measurement or assertion. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rule table, rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.\",\"Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026.\",\"R-C and R-D are the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera. R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup. R-D records that it is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.\",\"The latest pre-09:00 projector report records a passed startup test; the latest desk report records 24 desks; and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.\",\"Before 09:00, no equipment repair, room or safety task, unrelated setup task, or non-routine setup task for the lesson remains.\"] ,\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.", "negative_left": "Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.", "negative_right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:52 on 17 May 2026.", "right": "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:17 on 17 May 2026."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-079-015", "id": "fast-41-diverse-079-015-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["Report R-C bears the timestamp 08:41 on 17 May 2026.", "Report R-D bears the timestamp 08:52 on 17 May 2026.", "R-C and R-D are the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera. R-C records that the camera is present, passed its operational test, and has completed routine setup. R-D records that it is present, passed its operational test, and still has routine setup remaining.", "The latest pre-09:00 projector report records a passed startup test; the latest desk report records 24 desks; and the latest exit report records an unobstructed exit.", "Before 09:00, no equipment repair, room or safety task, unrelated setup task, or non-routine setup task for the lesson remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The original questions are verbatim, and both contexts preserve the governing scope, substitution, routing, and readiness policies. Mara, the lesson, Room Cedar, the request scope, and the relevant bindings remain unchanged. The focus spans are two complete factual sentences: \"For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.\" and \"In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register.\" The counterfactual coherently changes the spare’s register status to unapproved without contradicting other context. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a7": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a7": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a7": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a7": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a7": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a7": "supported"}, "right": {"a7": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship, and the focus atom concerns the factual approval status of the selected spare rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that status and are both realizable: policy permits an approved spare as a valid replacement but does not make installation of an unapproved spare physically impossible. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating requirement, scope, substitution, routing, and readiness rules needed to interpret the unchanged question; inventory details can be supplied through synthetic factual observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish that the only documented in-scope requirements are met: four tables are arranged, and the failed required projector is replaced by an installed, working, approved spare. The optional document camera is excluded for the non-assessed lesson. This yields medium readiness, and both projector tasks are routed to Instructional Technology as required.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The selected working spare is explicitly unapproved and is the only available spare, while the required ceiling projector has failed. It therefore cannot serve as the approved replacement required for medium readiness, leaving an in-scope projector requirement unmet and making the requested conjunctive decision false, regardless of the otherwise correct routing.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara's planned collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar is non-assessed."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has a room-dependent requirement for one projector."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has a room-dependent requirement for four movable group tables."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "A document camera is optional for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The ceiling projector designated for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has failed."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar is working."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar is listed as an approved spare."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The selected spare projector is installed in Room Cedar for Mara's planned lesson."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Four movable group tables are arranged in Room Cedar for Mara's planned lesson."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The selected spare projector is the only spare projector available for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "The proposed setup plan routes spare-projector installation for Mara's planned lesson to Instructional Technology."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The proposed setup plan routes repair of the failed ceiling projector for Mara's planned lesson to Instructional Technology."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Instructor Mara is preparing a collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar. The lesson is non-assessed. Its room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables, while a document camera is optional. The ceiling projector has failed; the selected spare is working and installed in Cedar, and four movable tables are arranged. That spare is the only spare available. The setup plan routes spare-projector installation and repair of the failed ceiling projector to Instructional Technology. The equipment record is dated 2026-09-17.\",\"evidence\":[\"The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional.\",\"Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment.\",\"The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant.\",\"Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed.\",\"For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.\",\"In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a7", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The optional document camera is out of scope because the lesson is non-assessed. The four required tables are arranged, and the failed required projector is replaced by the installed, working, approved spare, so every in-scope requirement is met using an approved substitute and readiness is medium. Both proposed projector-task routes match the checklist.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The optional document camera remains out of scope and the table requirement is met, but the failed required projector has no approved replacement because the only available spare is explicitly not approved. A required in-scope item therefore remains unmet, producing low rather than medium readiness, even though both projector-task routes match the checklist.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.", "negative_left": "For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.", "negative_right": "In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the unapproved-equipment register.", "right": "In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-082-006", "id": "fast-41-diverse-082-006-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the session cannot proceed at medium readiness or the proposed projector routing is incorrect.", "true": "Yes — the session may proceed at medium readiness, and the projector tasks should be routed to Instructional Technology."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated scope, exception, routing, and readiness rules to the documented lesson requirements.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Instructor Mara is preparing a collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar. The lesson is non-assessed. Its room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables, while a document camera is optional. The ceiling projector has failed; the selected spare is working and installed in Cedar, and four movable tables are arranged. That spare is the only spare available. The setup plan routes spare-projector installation and repair of the failed ceiling projector to Instructional Technology. The equipment record is dated 2026-09-17.", "evidence": ["The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional.", "Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment.", "The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant.", "Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed.", "For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.", "In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-082", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "24df64f969ed79e3b01d4b398ff4af3c6698fb6761e9c9c6c6eb55135a86e60d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The original questions are verbatim, and both contexts preserve the governing scope, substitution, routing, and readiness policies. Mara, the lesson, Room Cedar, the request scope, and the relevant bindings remain unchanged. The focus spans are two complete factual sentences: \"For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.\" and \"In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register.\" The counterfactual coherently changes the spare’s register status to unapproved without contradicting other context. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a7": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a7": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a7": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a7": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a7": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a7": "supported"}, "right": {"a7": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship, and the focus atom concerns the factual approval status of the selected spare rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that status and are both realizable: policy permits an approved spare as a valid replacement but does not make installation of an unapproved spare physically impossible. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating requirement, scope, substitution, routing, and readiness rules needed to interpret the unchanged question; inventory details can be supplied through synthetic factual observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish that the only documented in-scope requirements are met: four tables are arranged, and the failed required projector is replaced by an installed, working, approved spare. The optional document camera is excluded for the non-assessed lesson. This yields medium readiness, and both projector tasks are routed to Instructional Technology as required.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The selected working spare is explicitly unapproved and is the only available spare, while the required ceiling projector has failed. It therefore cannot serve as the approved replacement required for medium readiness, leaving an in-scope projector requirement unmet and making the requested conjunctive decision false, regardless of the otherwise correct routing.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara's planned collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar is non-assessed."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has a room-dependent requirement for one projector."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has a room-dependent requirement for four movable group tables."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "A document camera is optional for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The ceiling projector designated for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar has failed."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar is working."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The spare projector selected for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar is listed as an approved spare."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The selected spare projector is installed in Room Cedar for Mara's planned lesson."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Four movable group tables are arranged in Room Cedar for Mara's planned lesson."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The selected spare projector is the only spare projector available for Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "The proposed setup plan routes spare-projector installation for Mara's planned lesson to Instructional Technology."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The proposed setup plan routes repair of the failed ceiling projector for Mara's planned lesson to Instructional Technology."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Instructor Mara is preparing a collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar. The lesson is non-assessed. Its room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables, while a document camera is optional. The ceiling projector has failed; the selected spare is working and installed in Cedar, and four movable tables are arranged. That spare is the only spare available. The setup plan routes spare-projector installation and repair of the failed ceiling projector to Instructional Technology. The equipment record is dated 2026-09-17.\",\"evidence\":[\"The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional.\",\"Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment.\",\"The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant.\",\"Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed.\",\"For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.\",\"In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a7", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The optional document camera is out of scope because the lesson is non-assessed. The four required tables are arranged, and the failed required projector is replaced by the installed, working, approved spare, so every in-scope requirement is met using an approved substitute and readiness is medium. Both proposed projector-task routes match the checklist.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The optional document camera remains out of scope and the table requirement is met, but the failed required projector has no approved replacement because the only available spare is explicitly not approved. A required in-scope item therefore remains unmet, producing low rather than medium readiness, even though both projector-task routes match the checklist.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.", "negative_left": "For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.", "negative_right": "In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the unapproved-equipment register.", "right": "In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the approved-spares register."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-082-006", "id": "fast-41-diverse-082-006-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the session cannot proceed at medium readiness or the proposed projector routing is incorrect.", "true": "Yes — the session may proceed at medium readiness, and the projector tasks should be routed to Instructional Technology."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated scope, exception, routing, and readiness rules to the documented lesson requirements.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Instructor Mara is preparing a collaborative mapping lesson in Room Cedar. The lesson is non-assessed. Its room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables, while a document camera is optional. The ceiling projector has failed; the selected spare is working and installed in Cedar, and four movable tables are arranged. That spare is the only spare available. The setup plan routes spare-projector installation and repair of the failed ceiling projector to Instructional Technology. The equipment record is dated 2026-09-17.", "evidence": ["The lesson’s documented room-dependent requirements are one projector and four movable group tables; a document camera is marked optional.", "Scope policy: optional equipment is out of scope for non-assessed lessons. An approved spare may replace failed required equipment.", "The checklist assigns spare-projector installation and projector repair to Instructional Technology, table arrangement to Facilities, and cable taping to the teaching assistant.", "Readiness is high with no substitutions, medium when all in-scope requirements are met using an approved substitute, and low if any remain unmet. Medium or high may proceed.", "For Mara's planned lesson in Room Cedar, the selected spare projector is asset S-17.", "In the 2026-09-17 equipment inventory for Room Cedar, asset S-17 is listed in the unapproved-equipment register."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-082", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "24df64f969ed79e3b01d4b398ff4af3c6698fb6761e9c9c6c6eb55135a86e60d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full governing rubric and instructions, while neither context invents an exception or policy priority. Both contexts retain the lesson, room, requirements, and relevant time bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences: “At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee.” and “At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.” The counterfactual changes Jordan’s role without creating contradictory measurements, counts, or assertions. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a6 is an allowable universally quantified scope fact rather than a bundled outcome classification. The focus atom a14 is factual. Base and counter assignments differ only on a14 and are jointly realizable because a different delivery worker can still have a confirmed pre-class delivery time. Empty policy_evidence is correct because all governing rubric, routing, scope, and priority rules originate in the retained questions object, while the original state supplies case observations rather than additional policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction exhaustively identifies the documented requirements and establishes that all present items are adequate. The two open gaps are routed to the policy-designated teams with functional completion confirmed before class, while the incomplete checklist excludes level 3. This is sufficient for conditional readiness, level 2.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The required adapter is absent and its assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician. Thus the documented gap is not confirmed as routed to the correct responsible team, satisfying level 1 despite confirmed timely delivery and functionality. The remaining conditions exclude unrelated deficiencies and establish no unavoidable start-time failure requiring level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson specifies six groups of four as the required arrangement of the 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for one working display."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for an HDMI adapter."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 microscope worksheets."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every documented requirement for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is one of the chair-count, chair-arrangement, working-display, HDMI-adapter, or microscope-worksheet requirements."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Room B12’s movable chairs are currently arranged in the specified six groups of four."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The task of arranging Room B12’s chairs in six groups of four is assigned to the facilities coordinator."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The facilities coordinator’s confirmed completion time for arranging Room B12’s chairs is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Room B12 contains the display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is functional."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "The required HDMI adapter is currently present in Room B12."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "The worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is the instructional technology technician."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The assigned HDMI-adapter delivery worker’s confirmed delivery time is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The HDMI adapter assigned for delivery to Room B12 has passed a functionality test."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The number of microscope worksheets available for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is 24."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The setup checklist for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is complete."}], "base_state_json": "\"At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, an HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets; these are the complete documented requirements. Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs, but they are still in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to arrange them in six groups of four and has confirmed completion before the 10:00 start. Room B12 contains the intended functional display. The required HDMI adapter is absent from the room, although the assigned worker has confirmed delivery before class and the adapter has passed a functionality test. At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee. At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. Twenty-four microscope worksheets are available. The setup checklist remains incomplete.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "All documented requirements are enumerated. The display, chair count, worksheet count, and incoming adapter functionality are established. The two remaining gaps—chair arrangement and adapter presence—are assigned to the policy-designated teams with completion confirmed before 10:00. Because the checklist is not yet complete, conditional readiness rather than high readiness applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The documented adapter requirement remains unresolved because the adapter is absent. Although a functional adapter has a confirmed pre-class delivery time, the assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician required by the routing policy. The correct responsible team is therefore not confirmed, which is sufficient for limited readiness and requires the session to remain on hold.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee.", "negative_left": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee.", "negative_right": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is not the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.", "right": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-084-006", "id": "fast-41-diverse-084-006-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Low readiness: The session cannot proceed because at least one documented critical requirement will be unavailable or nonfunctional at the start time, even after feasible routing.", "1 — Limited readiness: A documented requirement is unresolved, and either the correct responsible team or completion before the start time is not confirmed; the session must remain on hold.", "2 — Conditional readiness: Requirements are documented, and any remaining required setup or equipment gaps have been routed to the correct teams with confirmed completion before class; proceed only after the setup checklist confirms completion.", "3 — High readiness: Every documented requirement is already present, functional, and arranged as specified, with the setup checklist complete and no required tasks open."], "instructions": "Rate operational readiness using the ordered rubric. Consider only documented lesson requirements; unrelated room defects and unused backup equipment are distractors. Route technology or adapter work to the instructional technology technician, furniture arrangement to the facilities coordinator, and learning-material preparation to the teaching assistant. Select the single best level index.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, an HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets; these are the complete documented requirements. Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs, but they are still in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to arrange them in six groups of four and has confirmed completion before the 10:00 start. Room B12 contains the intended functional display. The required HDMI adapter is absent from the room, although the assigned worker has confirmed delivery before class and the adapter has passed a functionality test. At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee. At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. Twenty-four microscope worksheets are available. The setup checklist remains incomplete."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-084", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "5f733b452b38156ea6a86432f9524e3bf6c0d9bcb4fbc4d38bc8439a9a038542", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the full governing rubric and instructions, while neither context invents an exception or policy priority. Both contexts retain the lesson, room, requirements, and relevant time bindings. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences: “At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee.” and “At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.” The counterfactual changes Jordan’s role without creating contradictory measurements, counts, or assertions. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition identifier, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "refuted", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a17": "supported", "a18": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a6 is an allowable universally quantified scope fact rather than a bundled outcome classification. The focus atom a14 is factual. Base and counter assignments differ only on a14 and are jointly realizable because a different delivery worker can still have a confirmed pre-class delivery time. Empty policy_evidence is correct because all governing rubric, routing, scope, and priority rules originate in the retained questions object, while the original state supplies case observations rather than additional policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction exhaustively identifies the documented requirements and establishes that all present items are adequate. The two open gaps are routed to the policy-designated teams with functional completion confirmed before class, while the incomplete checklist excludes level 3. This is sufficient for conditional readiness, level 2.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The required adapter is absent and its assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician. Thus the documented gap is not confirmed as routed to the correct responsible team, satisfying level 1 despite confirmed timely delivery and functionality. The remaining conditions exclude unrelated deficiencies and establish no unavoidable start-time failure requiring level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson specifies six groups of four as the required arrangement of the 24 movable chairs."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for one working display."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for an HDMI adapter."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson documents a requirement for 24 microscope worksheets."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every documented requirement for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is one of the chair-count, chair-arrangement, working-display, HDMI-adapter, or microscope-worksheet requirements."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Room B12’s movable chairs are currently arranged in the specified six groups of four."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "The task of arranging Room B12’s chairs in six groups of four is assigned to the facilities coordinator."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "The facilities coordinator’s confirmed completion time for arranging Room B12’s chairs is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Room B12 contains the display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "The display intended for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is functional."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "The required HDMI adapter is currently present in Room B12."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "The worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is the instructional technology technician."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "The assigned HDMI-adapter delivery worker’s confirmed delivery time is earlier than the 10:00 lesson start time."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "The HDMI adapter assigned for delivery to Room B12 has passed a functionality test."}, {"id": "a17", "statement": "The number of microscope worksheets available for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is 24."}, {"id": "a18", "statement": "The setup checklist for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson is complete."}], "base_state_json": "\"At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, an HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets; these are the complete documented requirements. Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs, but they are still in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to arrange them in six groups of four and has confirmed completion before the 10:00 start. Room B12 contains the intended functional display. The required HDMI adapter is absent from the room, although the assigned worker has confirmed delivery before class and the adapter has passed a functionality test. At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee. At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. Twenty-four microscope worksheets are available. The setup checklist remains incomplete.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee."}, {"path": [], "text": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "All documented requirements are enumerated. The display, chair count, worksheet count, and incoming adapter functionality are established. The two remaining gaps—chair arrangement and adapter presence—are assigned to the policy-designated teams with completion confirmed before 10:00. Because the checklist is not yet complete, conditional readiness rather than high readiness applies.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The documented adapter requirement remains unresolved because the adapter is absent. Although a functional adapter has a confirmed pre-class delivery time, the assigned delivery worker is explicitly not the instructional technology technician required by the routing policy. The correct responsible team is therefore not confirmed, which is sufficient for limited readiness and requires the session to remain on hold.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a17", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a18", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee.", "negative_left": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee.", "negative_right": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is not the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson.", "right": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-084-006", "id": "fast-41-diverse-084-006-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Low readiness: The session cannot proceed because at least one documented critical requirement will be unavailable or nonfunctional at the start time, even after feasible routing.", "1 — Limited readiness: A documented requirement is unresolved, and either the correct responsible team or completion before the start time is not confirmed; the session must remain on hold.", "2 — Conditional readiness: Requirements are documented, and any remaining required setup or equipment gaps have been routed to the correct teams with confirmed completion before class; proceed only after the setup checklist confirms completion.", "3 — High readiness: Every documented requirement is already present, functional, and arranged as specified, with the setup checklist complete and no required tasks open."], "instructions": "Rate operational readiness using the ordered rubric. Consider only documented lesson requirements; unrelated room defects and unused backup equipment are distractors. Route technology or adapter work to the instructional technology technician, furniture arrangement to the facilities coordinator, and learning-material preparation to the teaching assistant. Select the single best level index.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the instructor’s plan for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson lists 24 movable chairs arranged in six groups of four, one working display, an HDMI adapter, and 24 microscope worksheets; these are the complete documented requirements. Room B12 contains 24 movable chairs, but they are still in rows. The facilities coordinator is assigned to arrange them in six groups of four and has confirmed completion before the 10:00 start. Room B12 contains the intended functional display. The required HDMI adapter is absent from the room, although the assigned worker has confirmed delivery before class and the adapter has passed a functionality test. At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, the worker assigned to deliver the required HDMI adapter to Room B12 is Jordan Lee. At 09:00 on 17 September 2026, Jordan Lee is not the instructional technology technician for the 10:00 fictional biology lesson. Twenty-four microscope worksheets are available. The setup checklist remains incomplete."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-084", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "5f733b452b38156ea6a86432f9524e3bf6c0d9bcb4fbc4d38bc8439a9a038542", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the unchanged questions and the original policy. Entity, room, booking, and requirement bindings remain unchanged while observations vary. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: \"The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408.\" \"Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature.\" The counterfactual changes that record to exclude a roll-in shower without creating contradictory duplicate assertions. Neither context states a gold answer, label, rationale, rule table, identifier scheme, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"Booking note for Mara Venn: Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean, and Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds. Room 214 is also released and clean, has two beds, and Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower. The booking requires two beds and a documented roll-in shower; a quiet courtyard is only a preference. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Room 310 is not released because housekeeping has not cleared it. The front desk proposes Room 408 over Room 214. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408. Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408."}, {"path": [], "text": "Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408.", "negative_left": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408.", "negative_right": "Accessibility record AQ-17 lists no roll-in shower as its recorded feature.", "right": "Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-099-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-099-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Booking note for Mara Venn: Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean, and Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds. Room 214 is also released and clean, has two beds, and Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower. The booking requires two beds and a documented roll-in shower; a quiet courtyard is only a preference. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Room 310 is not released because housekeeping has not cleared it. The front desk proposes Room 408 over Room 214. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408. Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the unchanged questions and the original policy. Entity, room, booking, and requirement bindings remain unchanged while observations vary. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: \"The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408.\" \"Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature.\" The counterfactual changes that record to exclude a roll-in shower without creating contradictory duplicate assertions. Neither context states a gold answer, label, rationale, rule table, identifier scheme, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"Booking note for Mara Venn: Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean, and Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds. Room 214 is also released and clean, has two beds, and Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower. The booking requires two beds and a documented roll-in shower; a quiet courtyard is only a preference. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Room 310 is not released because housekeeping has not cleared it. The front desk proposes Room 408 over Room 214. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408. Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408."}, {"path": [], "text": "Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408.", "negative_left": "The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408.", "negative_right": "Accessibility record AQ-17 lists no roll-in shower as its recorded feature.", "right": "Accessibility record AQ-17 lists a roll-in shower as its recorded feature."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-099-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-099-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Booking note for Mara Venn: Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean, and Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds. Room 214 is also released and clean, has two beds, and Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower. The booking requires two beds and a documented roll-in shower; a quiet courtyard is only a preference. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Room 310 is not released because housekeeping has not cleared it. The front desk proposes Room 408 over Room 214. The Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record identified by code AQ-17 is assigned to Room 408. Accessibility record AQ-17 lists no roll-in shower as its recorded feature. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved because the original questions object is included verbatim and both contexts retain the stated policy. Question bindings remain Mara Venn, Room 408, the two hard requirements, and the relevant released-room comparison. Evidence contains two complete factual sentences: \"Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17.\" and \"Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower.\" The base context is coherent because AQ-17 identifies Room 408 and documents its roll-in shower. The counterfactual is coherent because only that documented accessibility fact changes to a documented lack of a roll-in shower. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"At Juniper Quay Hotel, Mara Venn’s booking requires two beds and a documented roll-in shower, while a quiet courtyard is only a preference. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor. The released-room inventory contains exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean and its hotel records document two beds. Room 214’s records document that it lacks a roll-in shower. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17. Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower. No other room is released for comparison, and Room 408 therefore remains the only released room with a complete documented record for review.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17."}, {"path": [], "text": "Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17.", "negative_left": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17.", "negative_right": "Entry AQ-17 states that the described room lacks a roll-in shower.", "right": "Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-099-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-099-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At Juniper Quay Hotel, Mara Venn’s booking requires two beds and a documented roll-in shower, while a quiet courtyard is only a preference. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor. The released-room inventory contains exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean and its hotel records document two beds. Room 214’s records document that it lacks a roll-in shower. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17. Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower. No other room is released for comparison, and Room 408 therefore remains the only released room with a complete documented record for review."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved because the original questions object is included verbatim and both contexts retain the stated policy. Question bindings remain Mara Venn, Room 408, the two hard requirements, and the relevant released-room comparison. Evidence contains two complete factual sentences: \"Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17.\" and \"Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower.\" The base context is coherent because AQ-17 identifies Room 408 and documents its roll-in shower. The counterfactual is coherent because only that documented accessibility fact changes to a documented lack of a roll-in shower. Neither context contains a gold answer, answer code, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"At Juniper Quay Hotel, Mara Venn’s booking requires two beds and a documented roll-in shower, while a quiet courtyard is only a preference. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor. The released-room inventory contains exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean and its hotel records document two beds. Room 214’s records document that it lacks a roll-in shower. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17. Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower. No other room is released for comparison, and Room 408 therefore remains the only released room with a complete documented record for review.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17."}, {"path": [], "text": "Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17.", "negative_left": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17.", "negative_right": "Entry AQ-17 states that the described room lacks a roll-in shower.", "right": "Entry AQ-17 states that the described room has a roll-in shower."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-099-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-099-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At Juniper Quay Hotel, Mara Venn’s booking requires two beds and a documented roll-in shower, while a quiet courtyard is only a preference. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor. The released-room inventory contains exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean and its hotel records document two beds. Room 214’s records document that it lacks a roll-in shower. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility record AQ-17 identifies Room 408 as the room described by entry AQ-17. Entry AQ-17 states that the described room lacks a roll-in shower. No other room is released for comparison, and Room 408 therefore remains the only released room with a complete documented record for review."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing policy, booking entities, proposed Room 408 assignment, and relevant room/release scope. The two retained evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes Room 408’s accessibility code consistently without contradictory duplicate claims. Neither context contains a gold answer, label code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean, and hotel records document two beds there. Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.” Those records assign code R1 to Room 408. Room 214’s records document two beds and no roll-in shower. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Mara’s quiet-courtyard preference is secondary to the reserved requirements. Room 310 has not been released by housekeeping. The front desk’s proposed assignment concerns Room 408, while the property record, rather than a guest photo, is the controlling documentation. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "Those records assign code R1 to Room 408."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.”", "negative_left": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.”", "negative_right": "Those records assign code N0 to Room 408.", "right": "Those records assign code R1 to Room 408."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-099-008", "id": "fast-41-diverse-099-008-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean, and hotel records document two beds there. Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.” Those records assign code R1 to Room 408. Room 214’s records document two beds and no roll-in shower. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Mara’s quiet-courtyard preference is secondary to the reserved requirements. Room 310 has not been released by housekeeping. The front desk’s proposed assignment concerns Room 408, while the property record, rather than a guest photo, is the controlling documentation. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "travel", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing policy, booking entities, proposed Room 408 assignment, and relevant room/release scope. The two retained evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes Room 408’s accessibility code consistently without contradictory duplicate claims. Neither context contains a gold answer, label code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "refuted", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a4": "supported"}, "right": {"a4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; a1 and a6 are permissible set-wide or universally quantified facts rather than bundles. The focus a4 is factual, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on a4 and are jointly realizable: lack of registry documentation need not itself mean that an accessibility feature is disputed. Policy evidence preserves the state-originating booking bindings, hard-requirement priority, and escalation rules needed alongside the unchanged question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes that Room 408 is clean and released, has record-documented fulfillment of both hard requirements, and that the only other released room, Room 214, is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower. Thus there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that could be a better fit. The no-dispute condition also excludes the specified accessibility-routing issue.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of a4 entails that hotel accessibility records do not document a roll-in shower for Room 408. Because a documented roll-in shower is a hard requirement, this alone is sufficient for the false outcome, irrespective of competitor ranking.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Room 408 is clean."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 408 has two beds."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records document a roll-in shower for Room 408."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Juniper Quay Hotel records document that Room 214 lacks a roll-in shower."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed."}], "base_state_json": "\"Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean, and hotel records document two beds there. Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.” Those records assign code R1 to Room 408. Room 214’s records document two beds and no roll-in shower. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Mara’s quiet-courtyard preference is secondary to the reserved requirements. Room 310 has not been released by housekeeping. The front desk’s proposed assignment concerns Room 408, while the property record, rather than a guest photo, is the controlling documentation. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "Those records assign code R1 to Room 408."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference."}, {"path": [], "text": "Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Room 408 is clean and released and has hotel-record documentation for both hard requirements. The exact released-room inventory excludes all rooms except 214 and 408, and Room 214 is documented as lacking the required roll-in shower, so there is no other clean, released, qualifying room that can outrank Room 408. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Room 408 lacks hotel-record documentation of the required roll-in shower, so it lacks documented fulfillment of a hard requirement regardless of the competing-room ranking. No accessibility feature under consideration is disputed, so no coordinator-routing issue alters this conclusion.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.”", "negative_left": "Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.”", "negative_right": "Those records assign code N0 to Room 408.", "right": "Those records assign code R1 to Room 408."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-099-008", "id": "fast-41-diverse-099-008-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "Room 408 lacks documented fulfillment of at least one hard requirement, or another clean, released room is a better fit; any disputed accessibility feature must be routed to the property accessibility coordinator.", "true": "Room 408 has documented fulfillment of both hard requirements and is a better overall fit than every other clean, released, qualifying room."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the proposed assignment and ranking fulfill the booking requirements. Answer yes only if Room 408 satisfies every hard requirement using documented hotel records and properly ranks above other clean, released, qualifying rooms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Juniper Quay Hotel’s released-room inventory lists exactly Rooms 214 and 408. Room 408 is clean, and hotel records document two beds there. Juniper Quay Hotel accessibility records define code R1 as “roll-in shower documented” and code N0 as “no roll-in shower documented.” Those records assign code N0 to Room 408. Room 214’s records document two beds and no roll-in shower. No accessibility feature of any room considered for Mara Venn’s booking is disputed. Mara’s quiet-courtyard preference is secondary to the reserved requirements. Room 310 has not been released by housekeeping. The front desk’s proposed assignment concerns Room 408, while the property record, rather than a guest photo, is the controlling documentation. At the fictional Juniper Quay Hotel, guest Mara Venn reserved two beds and a documented roll-in shower as hard requirements; a quiet courtyard room is a preference. Policy: hard requirements outrank preferences; undocumented accessibility claims go to the property accessibility coordinator, while release questions go to the housekeeping supervisor."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-099", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "9d5366becf5623f38fc196edc088880b1ee387955284d785575f2ec8643ed19e", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "travel-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the matching scale, release requirement, claimant, phone, bus, and date bindings. The evidence consists of complete factual sentences, including “The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM.” and “Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM.” The counterfactual coherently changes only Ivo’s identifier to ZX-4817-QN, creating no contradictory duplicate assertion. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition ID, or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"On 14 September 2026, Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 and recorded the find in the transit operator’s intake log. Ivo’s claim describes a black Solis A5 phone lost on bus 42 on 14 September 2026, matching the found phone’s type, date, and location. The sealed bag was accepted by a civic facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM. Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM. The custodian logged receipt of the bag. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM.", "negative_left": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QN.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 and recorded the find in the transit operator’s intake log. Ivo’s claim describes a black Solis A5 phone lost on bus 42 on 14 September 2026, matching the found phone’s type, date, and location. The sealed bag was accepted by a civic facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM. Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM. The custodian logged receipt of the bag. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the matching scale, release requirement, claimant, phone, bus, and date bindings. The evidence consists of complete factual sentences, including “The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM.” and “Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM.” The counterfactual coherently changes only Ivo’s identifier to ZX-4817-QN, creating no contradictory duplicate assertion. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition ID, or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"On 14 September 2026, Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 and recorded the find in the transit operator’s intake log. Ivo’s claim describes a black Solis A5 phone lost on bus 42 on 14 September 2026, matching the found phone’s type, date, and location. The sealed bag was accepted by a civic facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM. Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM. The custodian logged receipt of the bag. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM.", "negative_left": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QN.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QM."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 and recorded the find in the transit operator’s intake log. Ivo’s claim describes a black Solis A5 phone lost on bus 42 on 14 September 2026, matching the found phone’s type, date, and location. The sealed bag was accepted by a civic facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September 2026 is ZX-4817-QM. Ivo's purchase receipt dated 3 August 2026 lists the exact serial identifier for his phone as ZX-4817-QN. The custodian logged receipt of the bag. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the release question, matching policy, scope, and phone-to-Ivo bindings. The evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences: \"On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189.\" and \"Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189.\" The counterfactual changes the receipt identifier to Q7M4-2190 without creating contradictory duplicate assertions. Neither context embeds an answer, label, rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189. The found device is a black Solis A5, and Ivo's claim describes a black Solis A5 phone. His account places the loss on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the discovery details. The civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The custodian must decide whether to release the phone to Ivo using only these records.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189.", "negative_left": "On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2190.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case note: On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189. The found device is a black Solis A5, and Ivo's claim describes a black Solis A5 phone. His account places the loss on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the discovery details. The civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The custodian must decide whether to release the phone to Ivo using only these records."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the release question, matching policy, scope, and phone-to-Ivo bindings. The evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences: \"On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189.\" and \"Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189.\" The counterfactual changes the receipt identifier to Q7M4-2190 without creating contradictory duplicate assertions. Neither context embeds an answer, label, rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189. The found device is a black Solis A5, and Ivo's claim describes a black Solis A5 phone. His account places the loss on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the discovery details. The civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The custodian must decide whether to release the phone to Ivo using only these records.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189.", "negative_left": "On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2190.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2189."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-003", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case note: On 14 September, Mara found a phone on bus 42 whose recorded serial identifier was Q7M4-2189. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as Q7M4-2190. The found device is a black Solis A5, and Ivo's claim describes a black Solis A5 phone. His account places the loss on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the discovery details. The civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The custodian must decide whether to release the phone to Ivo using only these records."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy and release criteria in both full inputs. The phone, Ivo, custodian, bus 42, and 14 September bindings remain intact. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences: \"Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482.\" \"Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482.\" The counterfactual coherently changes only the receipt identifier to Q7M-483, creating the stated identifier conflict without contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds a gold answer, label rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"At the transit depot, Mara’s sealed find was logged after she discovered a phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item record identifies it as phone type T-17, while Ivo’s loss report identifies his missing phone as the same type. The two reports independently name 14 September and bus 42 as the relevant date and location. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian, the required storage location for transit finds. Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482. Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482.", "negative_left": "Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482.", "negative_right": "Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-483.", "right": "Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-004", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At the transit depot, Mara’s sealed find was logged after she discovered a phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item record identifies it as phone type T-17, while Ivo’s loss report identifies his missing phone as the same type. The two reports independently name 14 September and bus 42 as the relevant date and location. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian, the required storage location for transit finds. Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482. Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy and release criteria in both full inputs. The phone, Ivo, custodian, bus 42, and 14 September bindings remain intact. The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences: \"Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482.\" \"Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482.\" The counterfactual coherently changes only the receipt identifier to Q7M-483, creating the stated identifier conflict without contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds a gold answer, label rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"At the transit depot, Mara’s sealed find was logged after she discovered a phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item record identifies it as phone type T-17, while Ivo’s loss report identifies his missing phone as the same type. The two reports independently name 14 September and bus 42 as the relevant date and location. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian, the required storage location for transit finds. Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482. Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482.", "negative_left": "Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482.", "negative_right": "Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-483.", "right": "Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-482."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-004", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "At the transit depot, Mara’s sealed find was logged after she discovered a phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item record identifies it as phone type T-17, while Ivo’s loss report identifies his missing phone as the same type. The two reports independently name 14 September and bus 42 as the relevant date and location. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian, the required storage location for transit finds. Mara's incident record states that on 14 September she found phone type T-17 at bus 42, location L-3, with serial identifier Q7M-482. Ivo's loss report states that he lost phone type T-17 on 14 September at location L-3, and his purchase receipt lists serial identifier Q7M-483. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged question and stated matching and release policy without additions. The phone, Ivo, bus 42, 14 September 2026, custody path, and release scope remain bound. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: “On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day.” and “Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172.” The counterfactual coherently changes the receipt identifier to QL-9038, creating the stated identifier conflict without duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds a gold answer, code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day. Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172. The intake log identifies Mara's find and Ivo's reported loss as the same item type, and records bus 42 as the discovery and claimed-loss location. It also records the same calendar date for the discovery and reported loss. After a civic facility receptionist sealed the phone in a bag, it was transferred unopened to the transit-depot lost-property custodian, the required storage location for a bus find. No competing claimant or other phone is listed. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day.", "negative_left": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier QL-9038.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-006", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-006-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day. Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172. The intake log identifies Mara's find and Ivo's reported loss as the same item type, and records bus 42 as the discovery and claimed-loss location. It also records the same calendar date for the discovery and reported loss. After a civic facility receptionist sealed the phone in a bag, it was transferred unopened to the transit-depot lost-property custodian, the required storage location for a bus find. No competing claimant or other phone is listed. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged question and stated matching and release policy without additions. The phone, Ivo, bus 42, 14 September 2026, custody path, and release scope remain bound. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: “On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day.” and “Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172.” The counterfactual coherently changes the receipt identifier to QL-9038, creating the stated identifier conflict without duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds a gold answer, code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day. Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172. The intake log identifies Mara's find and Ivo's reported loss as the same item type, and records bus 42 as the discovery and claimed-loss location. It also records the same calendar date for the discovery and reported loss. After a civic facility receptionist sealed the phone in a bag, it was transferred unopened to the transit-depot lost-property custodian, the required storage location for a bus find. No competing claimant or other phone is listed. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day.", "negative_left": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier QL-9038.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier ZX-4172."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-006", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-006-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "On 14 September 2026, Mara found a smartphone with serial identifier ZX-4172 on bus 42, and Ivo's loss report states that he lost a smartphone on bus 42 that day. Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost smartphone lists serial identifier QL-9038. The intake log identifies Mara's find and Ivo's reported loss as the same item type, and records bus 42 as the discovery and claimed-loss location. It also records the same calendar date for the discovery and reported loss. After a civic facility receptionist sealed the phone in a bag, it was transferred unopened to the transit-depot lost-property custodian, the required storage location for a bus find. No competing claimant or other phone is listed. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the question, policy, entities, paths, and time bindings; the two quoted spans are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual changes the receipt identifier consistently without contradictory duplicates or answer leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: On 14 September, Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42. Ivo reported losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on that date, so the item's type, date, and location correspond. The phone was placed in a sealed bag by a civic-facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the transit depot's lost-property custodian, the required storage site for bus finds. The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM. Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4817-QM. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4817-QM."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM.", "negative_left": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4818-QM.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4817-QM."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-007", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-007-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case note: On 14 September, Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42. Ivo reported losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on that date, so the item's type, date, and location correspond. The phone was placed in a sealed bag by a civic-facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the transit depot's lost-property custodian, the required storage site for bus finds. The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM. Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4817-QM. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the question, policy, entities, paths, and time bindings; the two quoted spans are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual changes the receipt identifier consistently without contradictory duplicates or answer leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: On 14 September, Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42. Ivo reported losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on that date, so the item's type, date, and location correspond. The phone was placed in a sealed bag by a civic-facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the transit depot's lost-property custodian, the required storage site for bus finds. The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM. Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4817-QM. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4817-QM."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM.", "negative_left": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4818-QM.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4817-QM."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-007", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-007-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case note: On 14 September, Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42. Ivo reported losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on that date, so the item's type, date, and location correspond. The phone was placed in a sealed bag by a civic-facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the transit depot's lost-property custodian, the required storage site for bus finds. The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September has recorded serial identifier ZX-4817-QM. Ivo's purchase receipt for his lost phone lists serial identifier ZX-4818-QM. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged question, policy, scope, bindings, and exact factual evidence quotes without embedding an answer or contradictory assertions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"On 14 September, Mara recovered a black Solis A5 phone from bus 42 and recorded the recovery in the transit operator's log. Ivo reported losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item's type, the reported date, and the reported location. The civic facility receptionist accepted Mara's sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q. Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier ZX-4817-Q for his phone. The custodian will assess the claim using the recorded details. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier ZX-4817-Q for his phone."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q.", "negative_left": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier LM-9032-R for his phone.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier ZX-4817-Q for his phone."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-008", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-008-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "On 14 September, Mara recovered a black Solis A5 phone from bus 42 and recorded the recovery in the transit operator's log. Ivo reported losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item's type, the reported date, and the reported location. The civic facility receptionist accepted Mara's sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q. Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier ZX-4817-Q for his phone. The custodian will assess the claim using the recorded details. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged question, policy, scope, bindings, and exact factual evidence quotes without embedding an answer or contradictory assertions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"On 14 September, Mara recovered a black Solis A5 phone from bus 42 and recorded the recovery in the transit operator's log. Ivo reported losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item's type, the reported date, and the reported location. The civic facility receptionist accepted Mara's sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q. Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier ZX-4817-Q for his phone. The custodian will assess the claim using the recorded details. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier ZX-4817-Q for his phone."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q.", "negative_left": "The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier LM-9032-R for his phone.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier ZX-4817-Q for his phone."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-171-008", "id": "fast-41-diverse-171-008-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "On 14 September, Mara recovered a black Solis A5 phone from bus 42 and recorded the recovery in the transit operator's log. Ivo reported losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item's type, the reported date, and the reported location. The civic facility receptionist accepted Mara's sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. The phone Mara found on bus 42 on 14 September bears serial identifier ZX-4817-Q. Ivo's purchase receipt lists serial identifier LM-9032-R for his phone. The custodian will assess the claim using the recorded details. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions and both contexts preserve the latest-verified-update policy. Lena Mora, the stored item, the release request, and the relevant dates remain bound. The evidence consists of exactly two complete factual sentences: “Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item.” and “The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47.” The counterfactual coherently changes the verified inspection code to LC-52 without duplicating contradictory measurements. Neither context includes an answer code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"The case note concerns Lena Mora's release claim for a stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update was verified and was later than every other custody entry available when the claim was decided. Once that update was applied, the complete decision record contained exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: exactly three concerned circumstances, and all three agreed. Exactly one concerned an identifying detail, specifically the lining code reported by Lena Mora and the lining code recorded in the May 13 physical-inspection update. The stored item's lining code had not been disclosed to Lena before she reported a lining code, and that code is a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item. The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item."}, {"path": [], "text": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item.", "negative_right": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-52.", "right": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-174-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-174-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "The case note concerns Lena Mora's release claim for a stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update was verified and was later than every other custody entry available when the claim was decided. Once that update was applied, the complete decision record contained exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: exactly three concerned circumstances, and all three agreed. Exactly one concerned an identifying detail, specifically the lining code reported by Lena Mora and the lining code recorded in the May 13 physical-inspection update. The stored item's lining code had not been disclosed to Lena before she reported a lining code, and that code is a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item. The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions and both contexts preserve the latest-verified-update policy. Lena Mora, the stored item, the release request, and the relevant dates remain bound. The evidence consists of exactly two complete factual sentences: “Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item.” and “The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47.” The counterfactual coherently changes the verified inspection code to LC-52 without duplicating contradictory measurements. Neither context includes an answer code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"The case note concerns Lena Mora's release claim for a stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update was verified and was later than every other custody entry available when the claim was decided. Once that update was applied, the complete decision record contained exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: exactly three concerned circumstances, and all three agreed. Exactly one concerned an identifying detail, specifically the lining code reported by Lena Mora and the lining code recorded in the May 13 physical-inspection update. The stored item's lining code had not been disclosed to Lena before she reported a lining code, and that code is a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item. The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item."}, {"path": [], "text": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item.", "negative_right": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-52.", "right": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-47."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-174-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-174-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "The case note concerns Lena Mora's release claim for a stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update was verified and was later than every other custody entry available when the claim was decided. Once that update was applied, the complete decision record contained exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: exactly three concerned circumstances, and all three agreed. Exactly one concerned an identifying detail, specifically the lining code reported by Lena Mora and the lining code recorded in the May 13 physical-inspection update. The stored item's lining code had not been disclosed to Lena before she reported a lining code, and that code is a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora's 14 May 2026 claim record reports lining code LC-47 for the stored item. The verified May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item records lining code LC-52. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the claimant, item, May 13 timing, release scope, and latest-verified-update policy; the evidence consists of exactly two factual sentences: “Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item.” and “The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item.” The counterfactual coherently changes only the recorded code to LC-48, creating a single detail conflict without contradictory duplicate measurements, and neither context embeds an answer or classification instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Lena Mora’s claim concerns one stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update was verified and is later than every other custody entry available when the claim is decided. After that update, the complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: exactly three are circumstance comparisons, and all three agree; exactly one is an identifying-detail comparison. That sole detail comparison concerns the lining code Lena reported and the lining code recorded in the May 13 inspection. The stored item’s lining code had not been disclosed to Lena before she reported a code, and the stored code is a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-48 for the stored item.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-174-005", "id": "fast-41-diverse-174-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Lena Mora’s claim concerns one stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update was verified and is later than every other custody entry available when the claim is decided. After that update, the complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: exactly three are circumstance comparisons, and all three agree; exactly one is an identifying-detail comparison. That sole detail comparison concerns the lining code Lena reported and the lining code recorded in the May 13 inspection. The stored item’s lining code had not been disclosed to Lena before she reported a code, and the stored code is a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the claimant, item, May 13 timing, release scope, and latest-verified-update policy; the evidence consists of exactly two factual sentences: “Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item.” and “The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item.” The counterfactual coherently changes only the recorded code to LC-48, creating a single detail conflict without contradictory duplicate measurements, and neither context embeds an answer or classification instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Lena Mora’s claim concerns one stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update was verified and is later than every other custody entry available when the claim is decided. After that update, the complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: exactly three are circumstance comparisons, and all three agree; exactly one is an identifying-detail comparison. That sole detail comparison concerns the lining code Lena reported and the lining code recorded in the May 13 inspection. The stored item’s lining code had not been disclosed to Lena before she reported a code, and the stored code is a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-48 for the stored item.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-47 for the stored item."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-174-005", "id": "fast-41-diverse-174-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Lena Mora’s claim concerns one stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update was verified and is later than every other custody entry available when the claim is decided. After that update, the complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: exactly three are circumstance comparisons, and all three agree; exactly one is an identifying-detail comparison. That sole detail comparison concerns the lining code Lena reported and the lining code recorded in the May 13 inspection. The stored item’s lining code had not been disclosed to Lena before she reported a code, and the stored code is a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora reported lining code LC-47 for the stored item. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded lining code LC-48 for the stored item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the governing policy, Lena Mora, the single stored item, the May 13 latest-update binding, and the release-decision scope. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: “In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829.” and “The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829.” The counterfactual coherently changes the inspected code to L-4830 without creating contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: Lena Mora's claim concerns one stored item. A May 13 physical inspection produced a verified custody update, and it is later than every other custody entry available when the release decision is made. Applying that update leaves exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons in the complete decision record: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. The identifying-detail comparison concerns the lining code reported by Lena and the code recorded during the May 13 inspection. The stored item's code was not disclosed to Lena before she reported a code, and the stored code is a distinctive identifying detail. In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829. The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829. No additional claimant-to-item comparisons were made. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829."}, {"path": [], "text": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829.", "negative_left": "In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829.", "negative_right": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4830.", "right": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-174-007", "id": "fast-41-diverse-174-007-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Case note: Lena Mora's claim concerns one stored item. A May 13 physical inspection produced a verified custody update, and it is later than every other custody entry available when the release decision is made. Applying that update leaves exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons in the complete decision record: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. The identifying-detail comparison concerns the lining code reported by Lena and the code recorded during the May 13 inspection. The stored item's code was not disclosed to Lena before she reported a code, and the stored code is a distinctive identifying detail. In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829. The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829. No additional claimant-to-item comparisons were made. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the governing policy, Lena Mora, the single stored item, the May 13 latest-update binding, and the release-decision scope. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: “In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829.” and “The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829.” The counterfactual coherently changes the inspected code to L-4830 without creating contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: Lena Mora's claim concerns one stored item. A May 13 physical inspection produced a verified custody update, and it is later than every other custody entry available when the release decision is made. Applying that update leaves exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons in the complete decision record: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. The identifying-detail comparison concerns the lining code reported by Lena and the code recorded during the May 13 inspection. The stored item's code was not disclosed to Lena before she reported a code, and the stored code is a distinctive identifying detail. In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829. The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829. No additional claimant-to-item comparisons were made. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829."}, {"path": [], "text": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829.", "negative_left": "In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829.", "negative_right": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4830.", "right": "The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4829."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-174-007", "id": "fast-41-diverse-174-007-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Case note: Lena Mora's claim concerns one stored item. A May 13 physical inspection produced a verified custody update, and it is later than every other custody entry available when the release decision is made. Applying that update leaves exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons in the complete decision record: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. The identifying-detail comparison concerns the lining code reported by Lena and the code recorded during the May 13 inspection. The stored item's code was not disclosed to Lena before she reported a code, and the stored code is a distinctive identifying detail. In her release claim, Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as L-4829. The verified May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as L-4830. No additional claimant-to-item comparisons were made. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions and both full contexts preserve the governing policy. The title, subject, routing scope, advancement decision, and readiness bindings remain unchanged. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: “At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source.” and “At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source.” The counterfactual coherently changes the source count to one without contradictory duplicate assertions. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship or thresholded fact, and A4 is a factual submission-property rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are both feasible under the policy. The cited state passage preserves the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement rules; question-originated criteria need not be duplicated in policy_evidence. Both rules include sufficient routing and support-status conditions for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 establishes a municipal-policy central subject, which routes to City. A2–A4 satisfy the outline, clips, and source requirements, while A5 refutes accessibility of the primary record. Thus exactly one support requirement is missing, giving R3 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A1 establishes City routing. A2 and A3 satisfy the outline and clips requirements, while refuted A4 and A5 establish failure of both the source and primary-record requirements. Therefore at least two required supports are missing, giving R2 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At intake, the central subject of “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible outline."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains at least two accessible published clips."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” has at least two named on-record sources."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible primary record."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Intake note\",\"text\":\"The submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” concerns policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office. Its outline is accessible, and two published clips open from the intake packet. The ledger itself remains unavailable because the clerk has not released the primary record. The package is being assessed under the desk’s stated routing and readiness policy.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verified intake evidence\",\"text\":\"At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verified intake evidence\",\"text\":\"At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Managing editor\",\"text\":\"Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Intake note\",\"text\":\"The editor confirms that the submission is not a private-company, technical-research, or arts proposal. No additional attachment changes the unavailable-record status, and the intake packet remains otherwise accessible for review.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline, two clips, and two named on-record sources satisfy those support requirements, while the inaccessible or absent primary record leaves exactly one required supporting item missing. That is R3, which does not advance.", "target": "city_no_r3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline and two clips are present, but both the two-named-on-record-sources requirement and the accessible-primary-record requirement are unsatisfied. At least two required supporting items are therefore missing, yielding R2 and no advancement.", "target": "city_no_r2", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source.", "negative_left": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source.", "negative_right": "At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it names no other on-record source.", "right": "At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-211-018", "id": "fast-41-diverse-211-018-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"business_no_r3": "Route to Business, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_no_r2": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R2 because at least two required supporting items are missing.", "city_no_r3": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_yes_r4": "Route to City, advance, and rate R4 because all required supporting material is present.", "none_of_above": "Choose only if none of the listed desk, advancement, and readiness combinations matches the rubric.", "science_no_r3": "Route to Science, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing."}, "instructions": "Select the single option that correctly routes the pitch, makes the yes/no advancement decision, and assigns readiness under the stated rubric.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Intake note", "text": "The submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” concerns policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office. Its outline is accessible, and two published clips open from the intake packet. The ledger itself remains unavailable because the clerk has not released the primary record. The package is being assessed under the desk’s stated routing and readiness policy."}, {"speaker": "Verified intake evidence", "text": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source."}, {"speaker": "Verified intake evidence", "text": "At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source."}, {"speaker": "Managing editor", "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}, {"speaker": "Intake note", "text": "The editor confirms that the submission is not a private-company, technical-research, or arts proposal. No additional attachment changes the unavailable-record status, and the intake packet remains otherwise accessible for review."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-211", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "cbc6df5790624cfa72896fc4a6eb60ea90eca64b7a733760d9524c63ea357a4d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "city_no_r3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions and both full contexts preserve the governing policy. The title, subject, routing scope, advancement decision, and readiness bindings remain unchanged. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: “At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source.” and “At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source.” The counterfactual coherently changes the source count to one without contradictory duplicate assertions. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship or thresholded fact, and A4 is a factual submission-property rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are both feasible under the policy. The cited state passage preserves the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement rules; question-originated criteria need not be duplicated in policy_evidence. Both rules include sufficient routing and support-status conditions for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 establishes a municipal-policy central subject, which routes to City. A2–A4 satisfy the outline, clips, and source requirements, while A5 refutes accessibility of the primary record. Thus exactly one support requirement is missing, giving R3 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A1 establishes City routing. A2 and A3 satisfy the outline and clips requirements, while refuted A4 and A5 establish failure of both the source and primary-record requirements. Therefore at least two required supports are missing, giving R2 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At intake, the central subject of “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible outline."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains at least two accessible published clips."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” has at least two named on-record sources."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible primary record."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Intake note\",\"text\":\"The submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” concerns policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office. Its outline is accessible, and two published clips open from the intake packet. The ledger itself remains unavailable because the clerk has not released the primary record. The package is being assessed under the desk’s stated routing and readiness policy.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verified intake evidence\",\"text\":\"At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Verified intake evidence\",\"text\":\"At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Managing editor\",\"text\":\"Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Intake note\",\"text\":\"The editor confirms that the submission is not a private-company, technical-research, or arts proposal. No additional attachment changes the unavailable-record status, and the intake packet remains otherwise accessible for review.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline, two clips, and two named on-record sources satisfy those support requirements, while the inaccessible or absent primary record leaves exactly one required supporting item missing. That is R3, which does not advance.", "target": "city_no_r3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline and two clips are present, but both the two-named-on-record-sources requirement and the accessible-primary-record requirement are unsatisfied. At least two required supporting items are therefore missing, yielding R2 and no advancement.", "target": "city_no_r2", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source.", "negative_left": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source.", "negative_right": "At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it names no other on-record source.", "right": "At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it also names Tomas Vale as an on-record source."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-211-018", "id": "fast-41-diverse-211-018-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"business_no_r3": "Route to Business, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_no_r2": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R2 because at least two required supporting items are missing.", "city_no_r3": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_yes_r4": "Route to City, advance, and rate R4 because all required supporting material is present.", "none_of_above": "Choose only if none of the listed desk, advancement, and readiness combinations matches the rubric.", "science_no_r3": "Route to Science, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing."}, "instructions": "Select the single option that correctly routes the pitch, makes the yes/no advancement decision, and assigns readiness under the stated rubric.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Intake note", "text": "The submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” concerns policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office. Its outline is accessible, and two published clips open from the intake packet. The ledger itself remains unavailable because the clerk has not released the primary record. The package is being assessed under the desk’s stated routing and readiness policy."}, {"speaker": "Verified intake evidence", "text": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen as an on-record source."}, {"speaker": "Verified intake evidence", "text": "At intake, if the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” names Mira Chen, it names no other on-record source."}, {"speaker": "Managing editor", "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}, {"speaker": "Intake note", "text": "The editor confirms that the submission is not a private-company, technical-research, or arts proposal. No additional attachment changes the unavailable-record status, and the intake packet remains otherwise accessible for review."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-211", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "cbc6df5790624cfa72896fc4a6eb60ea90eca64b7a733760d9524c63ea357a4d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "city_no_r2"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy and bindings, provide two complete factual evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently changes only the second source observation without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship or thresholded fact, and A4 is a factual submission-property rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are both feasible under the policy. The cited state passage preserves the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement rules; question-originated criteria need not be duplicated in policy_evidence. Both rules include sufficient routing and support-status conditions for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 establishes a municipal-policy central subject, which routes to City. A2–A4 satisfy the outline, clips, and source requirements, while A5 refutes accessibility of the primary record. Thus exactly one support requirement is missing, giving R3 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A1 establishes City routing. A2 and A3 satisfy the outline and clips requirements, while refuted A4 and A5 establish failure of both the source and primary-record requirements. Therefore at least two required supports are missing, giving R2 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At intake, the central subject of “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible outline."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains at least two accessible published clips."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” has at least two named on-record sources."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible primary record."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Intake editor\",\"text\":\"The submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” concerns policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office. Its outline opens successfully, and two published clips are accessible.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Records clerk\",\"text\":\"The promised ledger remains unreleased, so no accessible primary record is available at intake.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Managing editor\",\"text\":\"Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Source registrar\",\"text\":\"The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Source registrar\",\"text\":\"The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records archivist Leon Quill in the second slot.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot."}, {"path": ["4", "text"], "text": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records archivist Leon Quill in the second slot."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline, two clips, and two named on-record sources satisfy those support requirements, while the inaccessible or absent primary record leaves exactly one required supporting item missing. That is R3, which does not advance.", "target": "city_no_r3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline and two clips are present, but both the two-named-on-record-sources requirement and the accessible-primary-record requirement are unsatisfied. At least two required supporting items are therefore missing, yielding R2 and no advancement.", "target": "city_no_r2", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot.", "negative_left": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot.", "negative_right": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records no occupant in the second slot.", "right": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records archivist Leon Quill in the second slot."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-211-020", "id": "fast-41-diverse-211-020-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"business_no_r3": "Route to Business, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_no_r2": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R2 because at least two required supporting items are missing.", "city_no_r3": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_yes_r4": "Route to City, advance, and rate R4 because all required supporting material is present.", "none_of_above": "Choose only if none of the listed desk, advancement, and readiness combinations matches the rubric.", "science_no_r3": "Route to Science, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing."}, "instructions": "Select the single option that correctly routes the pitch, makes the yes/no advancement decision, and assigns readiness under the stated rubric.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Intake editor", "text": "The submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” concerns policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office. Its outline opens successfully, and two published clips are accessible."}, {"speaker": "Records clerk", "text": "The promised ledger remains unreleased, so no accessible primary record is available at intake."}, {"speaker": "Managing editor", "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}, {"speaker": "Source registrar", "text": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot."}, {"speaker": "Source registrar", "text": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records archivist Leon Quill in the second slot."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-211", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "cbc6df5790624cfa72896fc4a6eb60ea90eca64b7a733760d9524c63ea357a4d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "city_no_r3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy and bindings, provide two complete factual evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently changes only the second source observation without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship or thresholded fact, and A4 is a factual submission-property rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are both feasible under the policy. The cited state passage preserves the governing routing, support, readiness, and advancement rules; question-originated criteria need not be duplicated in policy_evidence. Both rules include sufficient routing and support-status conditions for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 establishes a municipal-policy central subject, which routes to City. A2–A4 satisfy the outline, clips, and source requirements, while A5 refutes accessibility of the primary record. Thus exactly one support requirement is missing, giving R3 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A1 establishes City routing. A2 and A3 satisfy the outline and clips requirements, while refuted A4 and A5 establish failure of both the source and primary-record requirements. Therefore at least two required supports are missing, giving R2 and no advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At intake, the central subject of “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” is policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible outline."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains at least two accessible published clips."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” has at least two named on-record sources."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At intake, the submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” contains an accessible primary record."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Intake editor\",\"text\":\"The submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” concerns policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office. Its outline opens successfully, and two published clips are accessible.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Records clerk\",\"text\":\"The promised ledger remains unreleased, so no accessible primary record is available at intake.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Managing editor\",\"text\":\"Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Source registrar\",\"text\":\"The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Source registrar\",\"text\":\"The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records archivist Leon Quill in the second slot.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot."}, {"path": ["4", "text"], "text": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records archivist Leon Quill in the second slot."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline, two clips, and two named on-record sources satisfy those support requirements, while the inaccessible or absent primary record leaves exactly one required supporting item missing. That is R3, which does not advance.", "target": "city_no_r3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The municipal-policy subject routes to City. The outline and two clips are present, but both the two-named-on-record-sources requirement and the accessible-primary-record requirement are unsatisfied. At least two required supporting items are therefore missing, yielding R2 and no advancement.", "target": "city_no_r2", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot.", "negative_left": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot.", "negative_right": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records no occupant in the second slot.", "right": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records archivist Leon Quill in the second slot."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-211-020", "id": "fast-41-diverse-211-020-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"business_no_r3": "Route to Business, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_no_r2": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R2 because at least two required supporting items are missing.", "city_no_r3": "Route to City, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing.", "city_yes_r4": "Route to City, advance, and rate R4 because all required supporting material is present.", "none_of_above": "Choose only if none of the listed desk, advancement, and readiness combinations matches the rubric.", "science_no_r3": "Route to Science, do not advance, and rate R3 because exactly one required supporting item is missing."}, "instructions": "Select the single option that correctly routes the pitch, makes the yes/no advancement decision, and assigns readiness under the stated rubric.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Intake editor", "text": "The submission for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” concerns policy and accountability within the fictional Bellweather municipal housing office. Its outline opens successfully, and two published clips are accessible."}, {"speaker": "Records clerk", "text": "The promised ledger remains unreleased, so no accessible primary record is available at intake."}, {"speaker": "Managing editor", "text": "Route municipal policy to City, private-company coverage to Business, technical research to Science, and arts to Culture. Required support is an outline, two clips, two named on-record sources, and an accessible primary record; a promised record is missing. Readiness: R5 commissioned-ready, R4 complete, R3 exactly one item missing, R2 two or more missing, R1 outside remit. Advance only R4–R5."}, {"speaker": "Source registrar", "text": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” defines exactly two named on-record source slots and records journalist Mara Venn in the first slot."}, {"speaker": "Source registrar", "text": "The intake record for “The Last Rent-Control Ledger” records no occupant in the second slot."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-211", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "cbc6df5790624cfa72896fc4a6eb60ea90eca64b7a733760d9524c63ea357a4d", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "city_no_r2"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged policy, submission identity, title, and routing scope; the two evidence quotes are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual cleanly negates only the allegation while retaining all other facts.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. At intake, the pitch is classified as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission includes a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In the designated counterfactual review, all non-allegation records and classifications remain unchanged while the allegation entry is treated according to that counterfactual.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as not having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-023", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-023-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. At intake, the pitch is classified as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission includes a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In the designated counterfactual review, all non-allegation records and classifications remain unchanged while the allegation entry is treated according to that counterfactual."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "none_of_above"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the unchanged policy, submission identity, title, and routing scope; the two evidence quotes are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual cleanly negates only the allegation while retaining all other facts.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. At intake, the pitch is classified as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission includes a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In the designated counterfactual review, all non-allegation records and classifications remain unchanged while the allegation entry is treated according to that counterfactual.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as not having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-023", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-023-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-2049 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-2049 is recorded as not having an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. At intake, the pitch is classified as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission includes a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In the designated counterfactual review, all non-allegation records and classifications remain unchanged while the allegation entry is treated according to that counterfactual."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "travel_advance_3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy, and both contexts restate it without added exceptions. Mara Venn, submission CL-5831, and “The Free Weekend” remain bound correctly. The evidence spans are complete factual sentences, including “CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.”” The counterfactual coherently removes the misconduct allegation while keeping all other observations unchanged. Neither context states a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. Intake classification labels the pitch an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records, including booking documentation and interview notes. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual review, the non-allegation records and classifications remain unchanged while the allegation entry is treated differently.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as lacking an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-028", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-028-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. Intake classification labels the pitch an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records, including booking documentation and interview notes. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual review, the non-allegation records and classifications remain unchanged while the allegation entry is treated differently."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "none_of_above"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy, and both contexts restate it without added exceptions. Mara Venn, submission CL-5831, and “The Free Weekend” remain bound correctly. The evidence spans are complete factual sentences, including “CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.”” The counterfactual coherently removes the misconduct allegation while keeping all other observations unchanged. Neither context states a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. Intake classification labels the pitch an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records, including booking documentation and interview notes. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual review, the non-allegation records and classifications remain unchanged while the allegation entry is treated differently.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as lacking an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-028", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-028-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-5831 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-5831 is recorded as lacking an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. Intake classification labels the pitch an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records, including booking documentation and interview notes. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual review, the non-allegation records and classifications remain unchanged while the allegation entry is treated differently."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "travel_advance_3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy, and both contexts repeat it without exceptions or altered defaults. The submission, writer, title, allegation subject, and packet bindings remain fixed. The evidence contains the complete factual sentence “CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and the complete factual sentence “CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.”” The counterfactual coherently removes only the indexed allegation while retaining the classification and packet contents. Neither context states a gold answer, answer code, rationale, or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The same index lists no other commercial-misconduct allegation for this submission. Intake notes classify the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records, including booking documentation. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For the designated counterfactual review, the classification and packet contents remain unchanged while the indexed allegation is treated as absent.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as lacking an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-032", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-032-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The same index lists no other commercial-misconduct allegation for this submission. Intake notes classify the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records, including booking documentation. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For the designated counterfactual review, the classification and packet contents remain unchanged while the indexed allegation is treated as absent."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "none_of_above"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy, and both contexts repeat it without exceptions or altered defaults. The submission, writer, title, allegation subject, and packet bindings remain fixed. The evidence contains the complete factual sentence “CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and the complete factual sentence “CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.”” The counterfactual coherently removes only the indexed allegation while retaining the classification and packet contents. Neither context states a gold answer, answer code, rationale, or classifier instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The same index lists no other commercial-misconduct allegation for this submission. Intake notes classify the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records, including booking documentation. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For the designated counterfactual review, the classification and packet contents remain unchanged while the indexed allegation is treated as absent.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as lacking an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as containing an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-032", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-032-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s archive register links submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s signed allegation index records submission CL-7316 as lacking an allegation that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The same index lists no other commercial-misconduct allegation for this submission. Intake notes classify the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records, including booking documentation. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For the designated counterfactual review, the classification and packet contents remain unchanged while the indexed allegation is treated as absent."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "travel_advance_3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved verbatim in both contexts, including routing, exception, evidence, advancement, and scoring rules. Entity bindings remain Mara Venn, submission CL-731, and “The Free Weekend.” The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences: “CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.” The counterfactual coherently removes the allegation while keeping the classification and packet contents unchanged. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The register lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for the submission. Intake notes classify the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The packet contains a source memo citing interviews and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations and correspondence. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For the counterfactual review, classification and packet contents remain unchanged while the relevant allegation-register entry is treated as absent.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing no allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-034", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-034-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The register lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for the submission. Intake notes classify the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The packet contains a source memo citing interviews and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations and correspondence. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For the counterfactual review, classification and packet contents remain unchanged while the relevant allegation-register entry is treated as absent."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "none_of_above"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved verbatim in both contexts, including routing, exception, evidence, advancement, and scoring rules. Entity bindings remain Mara Venn, submission CL-731, and “The Free Weekend.” The two evidence spans are complete factual sentences: “CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.” The counterfactual coherently removes the allegation while keeping the classification and packet contents unchanged. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The register lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for the submission. Intake notes classify the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The packet contains a source memo citing interviews and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations and correspondence. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For the counterfactual review, classification and packet contents remain unchanged while the relevant allegation-register entry is treated as absent.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing no allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-034", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-034-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission ID CL-731 is recorded as containing no allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The register lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for the submission. Intake notes classify the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The packet contains a source memo citing interviews and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations and correspondence. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For the counterfactual review, classification and packet contents remain unchanged while the relevant allegation-register entry is treated as absent."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "travel_advance_3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing policy, scope, and question bindings. The evidence spans are complete factual sentences: “CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.” The counterfactual changes only the designated allegation entry and remains internally consistent. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The register contains no other commercial-misconduct allegation for this submission. Intake classification describes the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The packet includes a source memo, interview notes, and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual audit, only the designated allegation entry changes; the classification, packet, and policy records remain fixed.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as not alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-037", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-037-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The register contains no other commercial-misconduct allegation for this submission. Intake classification describes the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The packet includes a source memo, interview notes, and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual audit, only the designated allegation entry changes; the classification, packet, and policy records remain fixed."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "none_of_above"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing policy, scope, and question bindings. The evidence spans are complete factual sentences: “CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.” The counterfactual changes only the designated allegation entry and remains internally consistent. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The register contains no other commercial-misconduct allegation for this submission. Intake classification describes the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The packet includes a source memo, interview notes, and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual audit, only the designated allegation entry changes; the classification, packet, and policy records remain fixed.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as not alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-037", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-037-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” The CityLine allegation register records submission ID CL-731 as not alleging that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The register contains no other commercial-misconduct allegation for this submission. Intake classification describes the pitch as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The packet includes a source memo, interview notes, and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual audit, only the designated allegation entry changes; the classification, packet, and policy records remain fixed."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "travel_advance_3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy and bindings, the two evidence quotes are complete factual sentences, the allegation change is coherent, and neither context embeds an answer or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The accompanying review sheet lists no other commercial-misconduct allegation for the submission. At intake, the editor classifies the pitch as an ordinary destination guide and not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet includes a source memo naming two hotel employees and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For a separate counterfactual audit, the non-allegation records and intake classifications remain unchanged while the indexed allegation entry is treated differently.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as lacking an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-042", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-042-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The accompanying review sheet lists no other commercial-misconduct allegation for the submission. At intake, the editor classifies the pitch as an ordinary destination guide and not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet includes a source memo naming two hotel employees and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For a separate counterfactual audit, the non-allegation records and intake classifications remain unchanged while the indexed allegation entry is treated differently."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "none_of_above"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy and bindings, the two evidence quotes are complete factual sentences, the allegation change is coherent, and neither context embeds an answer or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The accompanying review sheet lists no other commercial-misconduct allegation for the submission. At intake, the editor classifies the pitch as an ordinary destination guide and not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet includes a source memo naming two hotel employees and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For a separate counterfactual audit, the non-allegation records and intake classifications remain unchanged while the indexed allegation entry is treated differently.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as lacking an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-042", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-042-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-731 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s allegation index records submission CL-731 as lacking an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The accompanying review sheet lists no other commercial-misconduct allegation for the submission. At intake, the editor classifies the pitch as an ordinary destination guide and not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet includes a source memo naming two hotel employees and documentary records consisting of booking confirmations. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. For a separate counterfactual audit, the non-allegation records and intake classifications remain unchanged while the indexed allegation entry is treated differently."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "travel_advance_3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the governing routing, exception, evidence, completeness, scoring, and review policies, while the unchanged questions preserve the full policy contract. The submission ID, writer, title, arrangement code, and relevant scope remain bound consistently. The required evidence is “CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.” Both evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the indexed allegation and remains consistent with the fixed guide classification and supporting materials. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. At intake, the pitch is classified as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission includes a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual review, all other records and classifications remain fixed while the indexed entry is treated differently.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing no allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-045", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-045-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. At intake, the pitch is classified as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission includes a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual review, all other records and classifications remain fixed while the indexed entry is treated differently."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "none_of_above"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the governing routing, exception, evidence, completeness, scoring, and review policies, while the unchanged questions preserve the full policy contract. The submission ID, writer, title, arrangement code, and relevant scope remain bound consistently. The required evidence is “CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.” Both evidence spans are complete factual sentences. The counterfactual changes only the indexed allegation and remains consistent with the fixed guide classification and supporting materials. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. At intake, the pitch is classified as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission includes a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual review, all other records and classifications remain fixed while the indexed entry is treated differently.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing no allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing an allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-045", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-045-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "CityLine’s intake ledger assigns submission ID CL-3187 to Mara Venn’s pitch titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation index, submission CL-3187 is recorded as containing no allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The index lists no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. At intake, the pitch is classified as an ordinary destination guide, not an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission includes a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. In a counterfactual review, all other records and classifications remain fixed while the indexed entry is treated differently."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "travel_advance_3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original policy and bindings, and the two evidence quotes are complete factual sentences: “CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.” The counterfactual changes only the allegation’s favorable/unfavorable detail without creating a contradiction or embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"At CityLine, intake register entry CL-8842 identifies Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The allegation register contains no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. Intake classification marks the pitch as an ordinary destination guide and not as an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. A counterfactual audit changes only the designated allegation entry and leaves the classification, packet contents, and register structure unchanged.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on unfavorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-059", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-059-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "At CityLine, intake register entry CL-8842 identifies Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The allegation register contains no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. Intake classification marks the pitch as an ordinary destination guide and not as an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. A counterfactual audit changes only the designated allegation entry and leaves the classification, packet contents, and register structure unchanged."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "none_of_above"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original policy and bindings, and the two evidence quotes are complete factual sentences: “CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.”” and “In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage.” The counterfactual changes only the allegation’s favorable/unfavorable detail without creating a contradiction or embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A2 is an allowed universal exhaustiveness fact rather than a bundled classification. A1 is factual rather than policy. The base and counter differ only on A1 and are jointly realizable with A2: in the counter, A2 can remain true vacuously because there are no commercial-misconduct allegations. The policy evidence preserves the substantive routing exception, completeness, advancement, and scoring rules from the original state; the unchanged questions automatically preserve the choice criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails a commercial-misconduct allegation. The explicit routing exception therefore sends the pitch to Investigations despite A3. A5 and A6 make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3. Because Investigations/advance/3 is neither listed substantive option, none_of_above follows.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A2 makes A1 exhaustive of all commercial-misconduct allegations, and refuting A1 therefore excludes any such allegation. With A3 supported, A4 refuted, and both A5 and A6 supported, the ordinary destination pitch routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "In Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend,” the pitch alleges that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "Every commercial-misconduct allegation in Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” is the allegation that the hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary destination guide."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At CityLine intake, Mara Venn’s submitted pitch “The Free Weekend” is an ordinary restaurant or dining review."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes a source memo."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Mara Venn’s CityLine submission of “The Free Weekend” includes documentary records."}], "base_state_json": "\"At CityLine, intake register entry CL-8842 identifies Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage. The allegation register contains no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. Intake classification marks the pitch as an ordinary destination guide and not as an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. A counterfactual audit changes only the designated allegation entry and leaves the classification, packet contents, and register structure unchanged.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.”"}, {"path": [], "text": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food."}, {"path": [], "text": "However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing."}, {"path": [], "text": "Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined."}, {"path": [], "text": "The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both."}, {"path": [], "text": "The managing editor reviews advanced assignments."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The alleged conditioning of hotel stays on favorable coverage is a commercial-misconduct allegation, so the explicit exception routes the pitch to Investigations despite its destination framing. The source memo and documentary records make it complete, advanced, and readiness 3, but Investigations/advance/3 is neither substantive option.", "target": "none_of_above", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Because every possible commercial-misconduct allegation is limited to A1 and A1 is explicitly refuted, no overriding misconduct allegation remains. The pitch is an ordinary destination guide rather than a restaurant review, and it has both supporting items, so it routes to Travel, advances, and receives readiness 3.", "target": "travel_advance_3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_left": "CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.”", "negative_right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on unfavorable dining coverage.", "right": "In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on favorable dining coverage."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-212-059", "id": "fast-41-diverse-212-059-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"food_advance_3": "Route to Food, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary restaurant or dining review with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation.", "none_of_above": "Choose when the policy-supported combination of desk, advance decision, and readiness score is neither substantive option, including when an explicit desk-routing exception applies.", "travel_advance_3": "Route to Travel, advance the pitch, and assign readiness 3. Choose only for an ordinary destination pitch with both supporting items and no overriding misconduct allegation."}, "instructions": "Choose the option that correctly states the editorial desk, advance decision, and ordered readiness score under the stated scope, exception, and supporting-material rules.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": "At CityLine, intake register entry CL-8842 identifies Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.” CityLine’s intake register assigns submission ID CL-7316 to Mara Venn’s submission titled “The Free Weekend.” In CityLine’s signed allegation register, submission CL-7316 is recorded as alleging that hotel stays identified by arrangement code FV-7 were conditioned on unfavorable dining coverage. The allegation register contains no other commercial-misconduct entry for this submission. Intake classification marks the pitch as an ordinary destination guide and not as an ordinary restaurant or dining review. The submission packet contains a source memo and documentary records. CityLine’s intake policy routes ordinary destination guides to Travel and restaurant reviews to Food. However, any pitch alleging commercial misconduct goes to Investigations, regardless of its travel or food framing. Investigations requires both a source memo and documentary records; complete pitches advance to the section editor, while incomplete ones are declined. The intake editor assigns a readiness score: 1 = neither item, 2 = exactly one, 3 = both. The managing editor reviews advanced assignments. A counterfactual audit changes only the designated allegation entry and leaves the classification, packet contents, and register structure unchanged."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-212", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "b3c0e6bd1574c6e30683fad1248e95c37bb302da9a10ed08d4fde4ec4d1730a3", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "travel_advance_3"}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the policy and Leo-related bindings, use two complete factual evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently distinguishes designation from attachment absence without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A5 is an acceptable universal fact over the submitted photographs. A4 is factual rather than policy-based. The policy evidence correctly preserves the governing routing, readiness, and required-material rules from the original state, while rules already retained in the questions need not be duplicated. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are realizable: all required materials can be present with no clarification needed, or the transcript alone can be absent without creating a contradiction with A6 being refuted.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion, presence of every required item, and absence of a need for editorial clarification. This is sufficient for the requested Urban Affairs/readiness-3 outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion while explicitly refuting attachment of the required interview transcript. Thus required material is missing, which mandates readiness level 1 and makes the requested readiness-3 outcome false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” is centered on housing policy."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "A draft is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "A source list is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "An interview transcript is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every photograph submitted with Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake has an attached permission."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” needs editorial clarification before section review."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs. Intake records identify Leo’s submission as “Who Owns the Courtyard?” and classify its subject as housing policy. The packet contains a draft, source list, and a permissions record covering every photograph submitted with the pitch. The review log says no editorial clarification is needed before section review. The intake receipt and document register state the following:\",\"evidence\":[\"For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript.\",\"The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 among the received materials.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 among the received materials."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, every required supporting item is attached, and no editorial clarification is needed before section review, so readiness level 3 applies.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, but its required interview transcript is not attached, so required material is missing and readiness level 1 applies rather than level 3.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript.", "negative_left": "For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript.", "negative_right": "The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 absent from the received materials.", "right": "The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 among the received materials."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-213-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-213-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — although Urban Affairs is the correct desk, do not advance it at level 3 because at least one required supporting item is missing; assign readiness level 1.", "true": "Yes — route the pitch to Urban Affairs and advance it as readiness level 3 because every required supporting item is present."}, "instructions": "Resolve the coreferences in Leo’s statement, apply the routing and readiness rubric, and answer the yes/no request.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs. Intake records identify Leo’s submission as “Who Owns the Courtyard?” and classify its subject as housing policy. The packet contains a draft, source list, and a permissions record covering every photograph submitted with the pitch. The review log says no editorial clarification is needed before section review. The intake receipt and document register state the following:", "evidence": ["For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript.", "The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 among the received materials."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-213", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "eebed6fab380a9cf21780ea4b72f53bdd0f128f73c5771bba42efcc9a21f6764", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the policy and Leo-related bindings, use two complete factual evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently distinguishes designation from attachment absence without embedding an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A5 is an acceptable universal fact over the submitted photographs. A4 is factual rather than policy-based. The policy evidence correctly preserves the governing routing, readiness, and required-material rules from the original state, while rules already retained in the questions need not be duplicated. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are realizable: all required materials can be present with no clarification needed, or the transcript alone can be absent without creating a contradiction with A6 being refuted.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion, presence of every required item, and absence of a need for editorial clarification. This is sufficient for the requested Urban Affairs/readiness-3 outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion while explicitly refuting attachment of the required interview transcript. Thus required material is missing, which mandates readiness level 1 and makes the requested readiness-3 outcome false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” is centered on housing policy."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "A draft is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "A source list is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "An interview transcript is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every photograph submitted with Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake has an attached permission."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” needs editorial clarification before section review."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs. Intake records identify Leo’s submission as “Who Owns the Courtyard?” and classify its subject as housing policy. The packet contains a draft, source list, and a permissions record covering every photograph submitted with the pitch. The review log says no editorial clarification is needed before section review. The intake receipt and document register state the following:\",\"evidence\":[\"For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript.\",\"The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 among the received materials.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 among the received materials."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, every required supporting item is attached, and no editorial clarification is needed before section review, so readiness level 3 applies.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, but its required interview transcript is not attached, so required material is missing and readiness level 1 applies rather than level 3.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript.", "negative_left": "For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript.", "negative_right": "The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 absent from the received materials.", "right": "The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 among the received materials."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-213-001", "id": "fast-41-diverse-213-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — although Urban Affairs is the correct desk, do not advance it at level 3 because at least one required supporting item is missing; assign readiness level 1.", "true": "Yes — route the pitch to Urban Affairs and advance it as readiness level 3 because every required supporting item is present."}, "instructions": "Resolve the coreferences in Leo’s statement, apply the routing and readiness rubric, and answer the yes/no request.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs. Intake records identify Leo’s submission as “Who Owns the Courtyard?” and classify its subject as housing policy. The packet contains a draft, source list, and a permissions record covering every photograph submitted with the pitch. The review log says no editorial clarification is needed before section review. The intake receipt and document register state the following:", "evidence": ["For Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at the 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake, interview transcript IT-17 is the document designated as its interview transcript.", "The 14 March 2026, 09:10 intake receipt for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” records attachment ID IT-17 absent from the received materials."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-213", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "eebed6fab380a9cf21780ea4b72f53bdd0f128f73c5771bba42efcc9a21f6764", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions object preserves the governing policy and request bindings. Base evidence: “The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.” “At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”.” Counterfactual evidence: “The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.” “At intake, document T-17 is absent from Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”.” Each evidence list has two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes attachment status without contradictory duplicates. Neither context contains answer metadata, label rationale, or output instructions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A5 is an acceptable universal fact over the submitted photographs. A4 is factual rather than policy-based. The policy evidence correctly preserves the governing routing, readiness, and required-material rules from the original state, while rules already retained in the questions need not be duplicated. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are realizable: all required materials can be present with no clarification needed, or the transcript alone can be absent without creating a contradiction with A6 being refuted.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion, presence of every required item, and absence of a need for editorial clarification. This is sufficient for the requested Urban Affairs/readiness-3 outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion while explicitly refuting attachment of the required interview transcript. Thus required material is missing, which mandates readiness level 1 and makes the requested readiness-3 outcome false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” is centered on housing policy."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "A draft is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "A source list is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "An interview transcript is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every photograph submitted with Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake has an attached permission."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” needs editorial clarification before section review."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs. Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” concerns housing policy. Intake records show that its draft and source list are attached, and every submitted photograph has an attached permission. The checklist says the pitch does not need editorial clarification before section review. The following inventory entries identify the relevant file and its intake status.\",\"evidence\":[\"The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.\",\"At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, every required supporting item is attached, and no editorial clarification is needed before section review, so readiness level 3 applies.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, but its required interview transcript is not attached, so required material is missing and readiness level 1 applies rather than level 3.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.", "negative_left": "The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.", "negative_right": "At intake, document T-17 is absent from Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”.", "right": "At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-213-016", "id": "fast-41-diverse-213-016-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — although Urban Affairs is the correct desk, do not advance it at level 3 because at least one required supporting item is missing; assign readiness level 1.", "true": "Yes — route the pitch to Urban Affairs and advance it as readiness level 3 because every required supporting item is present."}, "instructions": "Resolve the coreferences in Leo’s statement, apply the routing and readiness rubric, and answer the yes/no request.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs. Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” concerns housing policy. Intake records show that its draft and source list are attached, and every submitted photograph has an attached permission. The checklist says the pitch does not need editorial clarification before section review. The following inventory entries identify the relevant file and its intake status.", "evidence": ["The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.", "At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-213", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "eebed6fab380a9cf21780ea4b72f53bdd0f128f73c5771bba42efcc9a21f6764", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions object preserves the governing policy and request bindings. Base evidence: “The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.” “At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”.” Counterfactual evidence: “The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.” “At intake, document T-17 is absent from Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”.” Each evidence list has two complete factual sentences. The counterfactual coherently changes attachment status without contradictory duplicates. Neither context contains answer metadata, label rationale, or output instructions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted", "A5": "supported", "A6": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; A5 is an acceptable universal fact over the submitted photographs. A4 is factual rather than policy-based. The policy evidence correctly preserves the governing routing, readiness, and required-material rules from the original state, while rules already retained in the questions need not be duplicated. The base and counter assignments differ only on A4 and are realizable: all required materials can be present with no clarification needed, or the transcript alone can be absent without creating a contradiction with A6 being refuted.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion, presence of every required item, and absence of a need for editorial clarification. This is sufficient for the requested Urban Affairs/readiness-3 outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish the Urban Affairs routing criterion while explicitly refuting attachment of the required interview transcript. Thus required material is missing, which mandates readiness level 1 and makes the requested readiness-3 outcome false.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” is centered on housing policy."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "A draft is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "A source list is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "An interview transcript is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every photograph submitted with Leo’s pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” at intake has an attached permission."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” needs editorial clarification before section review."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs. Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” concerns housing policy. Intake records show that its draft and source list are attached, and every submitted photograph has an attached permission. The checklist says the pitch does not need editorial clarification before section review. The following inventory entries identify the relevant file and its intake status.\",\"evidence\":[\"The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.\",\"At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, every required supporting item is attached, and no editorial clarification is needed before section review, so readiness level 3 applies.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The pitch belongs at Urban Affairs, but its required interview transcript is not attached, so required material is missing and readiness level 1 applies rather than level 3.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.", "negative_left": "The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.", "negative_right": "At intake, document T-17 is absent from Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”.", "right": "At intake, document T-17 is attached to Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-213-016", "id": "fast-41-diverse-213-016-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — although Urban Affairs is the correct desk, do not advance it at level 3 because at least one required supporting item is missing; assign readiness level 1.", "true": "Yes — route the pitch to Urban Affairs and advance it as readiness level 3 because every required supporting item is present."}, "instructions": "Resolve the coreferences in Leo’s statement, apply the routing and readiness rubric, and answer the yes/no request.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "Managing editor Imani’s rubric routes pitches centered on housing policy to the Urban Affairs desk. Readiness is ordered: 1 = missing required material; 2 = all required material present but needing editorial clarification; 3 = ready for section review. Urban Affairs requires a draft, source list, interview transcript, and permissions for submitted photographs. Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” concerns housing policy. Intake records show that its draft and source list are attached, and every submitted photograph has an attached permission. The checklist says the pitch does not need editorial clarification before section review. The following inventory entries identify the relevant file and its intake status.", "evidence": ["The intake inventory for Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?” labels document T-17 as an interview transcript.", "At intake, document T-17 is absent from Leo’s submitted pitch “Who Owns the Courtyard?”."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-213", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "eebed6fab380a9cf21780ea4b72f53bdd0f128f73c5771bba42efcc9a21f6764", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions object preserves the governing rubric and both contexts retain the same policy. Both contexts preserve Mara Venn, the Bellweather transit-authority pitch, Northline intake, and the requested routing and advancement scope. Every evidence item is a complete factual sentence rather than a policy definition or instruction. The counterfactual coherently changes only Cedar’s contact classification, making that status unclassified without contradicting another assertion: \"At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.\" \"In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to unclassified contact and M8 to confidential contact.\" Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "refuted", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A8": "supported"}, "right": {"A8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the universally quantified source-map atoms remain atomic. A8 is a factual property of the submitted source map rather than a policy proposition. The base and counter assignments can coexist with all unchanged atoms: the same attached map can list all sources and their roles while differing only in whether every listed source has a valid attribution-status code. The state-derived routing, material, source-map, and non-advancement rules are preserved in policy_evidence. The extra state request citation is unnecessary but does not make the policy incomplete; question-originated rubric details need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes the Investigations routing, all generally required materials, every Investigations source-map requirement, and the level-3 editorial showing. Refutation of unusually strong documentation necessarily excludes level 4 because that quality is a required conjunct of level 4.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A8 establishes that the source map fails to provide an allowed attribution status for at least one listed source. Because the map lists every identified source and the pitch is otherwise routeable, this is an applicable missing administrative requirement, making level 1 mandatory and barring advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, the subject matter of Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is an allegation of systemic wrongdoing."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is assigned to the Investigations desk."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, the outline submitted with Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch contains between 250 and 400 words inclusive."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch includes at least two relevant published clips."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 is attached to Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Source map SM-1 lists every source identified in Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch at Northline Magazine intake."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Source map SM-1 identifies a role for every source it lists."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "For every source listed in source map SM-1, SM-1 assigns a code that its legend maps to on-record, background, or confidential contact."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch has a plausible premise."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch identifies a sourcing path."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch includes relevant evidence."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch demonstrates unusually strong documentation."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong.\",\"evidence\":[\"At Northline Magazine intake, the subject matter of Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is an allegation of systemic wrongdoing.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is assigned to the Investigations desk.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, the outline submitted with Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch contains 330 words, and the pitch includes two relevant published clips.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 is attached to Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 lists every source identified in Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch and identifies a role for every source it lists.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.\",\"In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to on-record contact and M8 to confidential contact.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch has a plausible premise, identifies a sourcing path, and includes relevant evidence from procurement records.\",\"An editorial review found the documentation adequate for section review but not unusually strong because the material lacked distinctive exclusivity and additional corroboration.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8."}, {"path": ["evidence", "6"], "text": "In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to on-record contact and M8 to confidential contact."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch is correctly routed to Investigations, satisfies every applicable administrative requirement, and has a plausible premise, an identified sourcing path, and relevant evidence. Refutation of unusually strong documentation excludes level 4, which requires that quality in addition to level 3.", "target": "3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The systemic-wrongdoing subject makes the Investigations desk clear, but the submitted source map fails the Investigations requirement to state whether contact with every source is on-record, background, or confidential. The ordered rubric therefore requires return for completion and no advancement despite the otherwise sufficient editorial showing.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.", "negative_left": "At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.", "negative_right": "In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to unclassified contact and M8 to confidential contact.", "right": "In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to on-record contact and M8 to confidential contact."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-216-009", "id": "fast-41-diverse-216-009-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Unrouteable or out of scope: the pitch lacks a discernible magazine subject or cannot be assigned to any desk; do not advance.", "1 — Routeable but administratively incomplete: the appropriate desk is clear, but at least one required supporting item is missing; return for completion and do not advance.", "2 — Administratively complete but editorially weak: all required materials are present, yet the premise, sourcing plan, or evidence is too thin for section-editor review; decline or request redevelopment.", "3 — Ready for section review: correctly routed, administratively complete, and supported by a plausible premise, identified sourcing path, and relevant evidence; advance to the section editor.", "4 — Commission-ready priority: meets level 3 and also demonstrates unusually strong documentation, timely significance, clear access, and a distinctive or exclusive angle; escalate to the managing editor for prompt commissioning consideration."], "instructions": "Apply the ordered rubric exactly. Desk assignment follows the subject matter, not the writer’s requested desk. Select one level and include its routing and advancement consequence.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong.", "evidence": ["At Northline Magazine intake, the subject matter of Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is an allegation of systemic wrongdoing.", "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is assigned to the Investigations desk.", "At Northline Magazine intake, the outline submitted with Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch contains 330 words, and the pitch includes two relevant published clips.", "At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 is attached to Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch.", "At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 lists every source identified in Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch and identifies a role for every source it lists.", "At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.", "In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to on-record contact and M8 to confidential contact.", "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch has a plausible premise, identifies a sourcing path, and includes relevant evidence from procurement records.", "An editorial review found the documentation adequate for section review but not unusually strong because the material lacked distinctive exclusivity and additional corroboration."], "request": "Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-216", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "115ca52b48fc3e00e029fe3e36be6adc7e0aeac5dc5492fb9dfb8c73b79ac0f2", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 3}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions object preserves the governing rubric and both contexts retain the same policy. Both contexts preserve Mara Venn, the Bellweather transit-authority pitch, Northline intake, and the requested routing and advancement scope. Every evidence item is a complete factual sentence rather than a policy definition or instruction. The counterfactual coherently changes only Cedar’s contact classification, making that status unclassified without contradicting another assertion: \"At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.\" \"In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to unclassified contact and M8 to confidential contact.\" Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rule table, proposition ID, label rationale, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "refuted", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "refuted", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "refuted", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A8": "supported"}, "right": {"A8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the universally quantified source-map atoms remain atomic. A8 is a factual property of the submitted source map rather than a policy proposition. The base and counter assignments can coexist with all unchanged atoms: the same attached map can list all sources and their roles while differing only in whether every listed source has a valid attribution-status code. The state-derived routing, material, source-map, and non-advancement rules are preserved in policy_evidence. The extra state request citation is unnecessary but does not make the policy incomplete; question-originated rubric details need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction establishes the Investigations routing, all generally required materials, every Investigations source-map requirement, and the level-3 editorial showing. Refutation of unusually strong documentation necessarily excludes level 4 because that quality is a required conjunct of level 4.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A8 establishes that the source map fails to provide an allowed attribution status for at least one listed source. Because the map lists every identified source and the pitch is otherwise routeable, this is an applicable missing administrative requirement, making level 1 mandatory and barring advancement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, the subject matter of Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is an allegation of systemic wrongdoing."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is assigned to the Investigations desk."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, the outline submitted with Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch contains between 250 and 400 words inclusive."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch includes at least two relevant published clips."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 is attached to Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Source map SM-1 lists every source identified in Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch at Northline Magazine intake."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Source map SM-1 identifies a role for every source it lists."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "For every source listed in source map SM-1, SM-1 assigns a code that its legend maps to on-record, background, or confidential contact."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch has a plausible premise."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch identifies a sourcing path."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch includes relevant evidence."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch demonstrates unusually strong documentation."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong.\",\"evidence\":[\"At Northline Magazine intake, the subject matter of Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is an allegation of systemic wrongdoing.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is assigned to the Investigations desk.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, the outline submitted with Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch contains 330 words, and the pitch includes two relevant published clips.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 is attached to Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 lists every source identified in Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch and identifies a role for every source it lists.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.\",\"In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to on-record contact and M8 to confidential contact.\",\"At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch has a plausible premise, identifies a sourcing path, and includes relevant evidence from procurement records.\",\"An editorial review found the documentation adequate for section review but not unusually strong because the material lacked distinctive exclusivity and additional corroboration.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8."}, {"path": ["evidence", "6"], "text": "In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to on-record contact and M8 to confidential contact."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The pitch is correctly routed to Investigations, satisfies every applicable administrative requirement, and has a plausible premise, an identified sourcing path, and relevant evidence. Refutation of unusually strong documentation excludes level 4, which requires that quality in addition to level 3.", "target": "3", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The systemic-wrongdoing subject makes the Investigations desk clear, but the submitted source map fails the Investigations requirement to state whether contact with every source is on-record, background, or confidential. The ordered rubric therefore requires return for completion and no advancement despite the otherwise sufficient editorial showing.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.", "negative_left": "At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.", "negative_right": "In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to unclassified contact and M8 to confidential contact.", "right": "In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to on-record contact and M8 to confidential contact."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-216-009", "id": "fast-41-diverse-216-009-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Unrouteable or out of scope: the pitch lacks a discernible magazine subject or cannot be assigned to any desk; do not advance.", "1 — Routeable but administratively incomplete: the appropriate desk is clear, but at least one required supporting item is missing; return for completion and do not advance.", "2 — Administratively complete but editorially weak: all required materials are present, yet the premise, sourcing plan, or evidence is too thin for section-editor review; decline or request redevelopment.", "3 — Ready for section review: correctly routed, administratively complete, and supported by a plausible premise, identified sourcing path, and relevant evidence; advance to the section editor.", "4 — Commission-ready priority: meets level 3 and also demonstrates unusually strong documentation, timely significance, clear access, and a distinctive or exclusive angle; escalate to the managing editor for prompt commissioning consideration."], "instructions": "Apply the ordered rubric exactly. Desk assignment follows the subject matter, not the writer’s requested desk. Select one level and include its routing and advancement consequence.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "Northline Magazine routes allegations of systemic wrongdoing to the Investigations desk; ordinary municipal-service stories go to the City desk. Every pitch requires a 250–400-word outline and two relevant published clips. Investigations pitches also require a source map identifying each source’s role and whether contact is on-record, background, or confidential. Intake may not advance an administratively incomplete pitch, even when its premise is strong.", "evidence": ["At Northline Magazine intake, the subject matter of Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is an allegation of systemic wrongdoing.", "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch is assigned to the Investigations desk.", "At Northline Magazine intake, the outline submitted with Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch contains 330 words, and the pitch includes two relevant published clips.", "At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 is attached to Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch.", "At Northline Magazine intake, source map SM-1 lists every source identified in Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch and identifies a role for every source it lists.", "At Northline Magazine intake on 14 May 2026, source map SM-1 lists exactly two sources—source Cedar and source Flint—and assigns Cedar code Q4 and Flint code M8.", "In source map SM-1 at that intake, the legend maps Q4 to unclassified contact and M8 to confidential contact.", "At Northline Magazine intake, Mara Venn’s Bellweather transit-authority pitch has a plausible premise, identifies a sourcing path, and includes relevant evidence from procurement records.", "An editorial review found the documentation adequate for section review but not unusually strong because the material lacked distinctive exclusivity and additional corroboration."], "request": "Choose the readiness level, route the pitch to the correct desk, verify required materials, and state whether the intake editor should advance it to the section editor."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-216", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "115ca52b48fc3e00e029fe3e36be6adc7e0aeac5dc5492fb9dfb8c73b79ac0f2", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the verbatim questions and all governing policy. Both preserve the PR-482 supplier-bid scope and relevant entity and timing bindings. The evidence contains two complete factual sentences: \"The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.\" and \"PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units.\" The counterfactual coherently changes the stated minimum to 760 while retaining the quoted capacity of 720. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition ID, rule table, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A3": "supported"}, "right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship rather than a final policy classification. A3 is a factual capacity comparison and is an appropriate focus. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A3 changing: a supplier can meet or fail the capacity minimum while all other facts remain satisfied. The state-derived policy evidence preserves the thresholds, inclusive boundaries, current attachment requirement, non-waiver rule, and clarification consequence needed in addition to the automatically retained question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current-document requirement. It therefore sufficiently entails the true outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A3 entails that quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's required minimum. Since any unsatisfied stated requirement requires the false outcome, this conjunction is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The total price quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than $12,000."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The lead time quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than 30 calendar days."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The monthly gasket capacity stated in the supplier quotation for PR-482 is greater than or equal to the minimum monthly gasket capacity stated in PR-482."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current at the time the PR-482 package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The supplier's current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The required material certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "The drawing submitted for PR-482 bears the required signature at the time the package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The signed drawing is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matches the technical specification in PR-482."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"PR-482 requires a supplier total of no more than $12,000, delivery within 30 calendar days, the stated monthly capacity threshold, current ISO 9001 certification, a material certificate, a signed drawing, and a gasket specification matching the technical specification.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Supplier account representative\",\"text\":\"The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units. PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units. The quoted total is $12,000, and the lead time is 30 calendar days. The quoted gasket specification matches PR-482's technical specification.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current during evaluation, and its current certificate is attached. The required material certificate is attached. The submitted drawing bears the required signature, and the signed drawing is attached.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"technical match does not waive the attachment requirements.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, including the permitted boundary values.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's minimum monthly capacity, so at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.", "negative_left": "The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.", "negative_right": "PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 760 units.", "right": "PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-273-007", "id": "fast-41-diverse-273-007-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now, so do not route for approval; route for supplier clarification.", "true": "Yes — every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, so route for approval."}, "instructions": "Is the supplier bid ready to route for approval now under the stated rubric? Resolve pronouns using their nearest coherent antecedent.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "PR-482 requires a supplier total of no more than $12,000, delivery within 30 calendar days, the stated monthly capacity threshold, current ISO 9001 certification, a material certificate, a signed drawing, and a gasket specification matching the technical specification."}, {"speaker": "Supplier account representative", "text": "The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units. PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units. The quoted total is $12,000, and the lead time is 30 calendar days. The quoted gasket specification matches PR-482's technical specification."}, {"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current during evaluation, and its current certificate is attached. The required material certificate is attached. The submitted drawing bears the required signature, and the signed drawing is attached."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-273", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "705cd3052bdf64748b8250949b9404bf1efac894ae897e1c1a0f25374b6c3b6f", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the verbatim questions and all governing policy. Both preserve the PR-482 supplier-bid scope and relevant entity and timing bindings. The evidence contains two complete factual sentences: \"The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.\" and \"PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units.\" The counterfactual coherently changes the stated minimum to 760 while retaining the quoted capacity of 720. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, proposition ID, rule table, or classifier-output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A3": "supported"}, "right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship rather than a final policy classification. A3 is a factual capacity comparison and is an appropriate focus. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A3 changing: a supplier can meet or fail the capacity minimum while all other facts remain satisfied. The state-derived policy evidence preserves the thresholds, inclusive boundaries, current attachment requirement, non-waiver rule, and clarification consequence needed in addition to the automatically retained question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current-document requirement. It therefore sufficiently entails the true outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A3 entails that quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's required minimum. Since any unsatisfied stated requirement requires the false outcome, this conjunction is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The total price quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than $12,000."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The lead time quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than 30 calendar days."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The monthly gasket capacity stated in the supplier quotation for PR-482 is greater than or equal to the minimum monthly gasket capacity stated in PR-482."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current at the time the PR-482 package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The supplier's current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The required material certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "The drawing submitted for PR-482 bears the required signature at the time the package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The signed drawing is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matches the technical specification in PR-482."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"PR-482 requires a supplier total of no more than $12,000, delivery within 30 calendar days, the stated monthly capacity threshold, current ISO 9001 certification, a material certificate, a signed drawing, and a gasket specification matching the technical specification.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Supplier account representative\",\"text\":\"The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units. PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units. The quoted total is $12,000, and the lead time is 30 calendar days. The quoted gasket specification matches PR-482's technical specification.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current during evaluation, and its current certificate is attached. The required material certificate is attached. The submitted drawing bears the required signature, and the signed drawing is attached.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"technical match does not waive the attachment requirements.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, including the permitted boundary values.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's minimum monthly capacity, so at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.", "negative_left": "The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.", "negative_right": "PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 760 units.", "right": "PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-273-007", "id": "fast-41-diverse-273-007-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now, so do not route for approval; route for supplier clarification.", "true": "Yes — every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, so route for approval."}, "instructions": "Is the supplier bid ready to route for approval now under the stated rubric? Resolve pronouns using their nearest coherent antecedent.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "PR-482 requires a supplier total of no more than $12,000, delivery within 30 calendar days, the stated monthly capacity threshold, current ISO 9001 certification, a material certificate, a signed drawing, and a gasket specification matching the technical specification."}, {"speaker": "Supplier account representative", "text": "The supplier quotation for PR-482 states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units. PR-482 states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 760 units. The quoted total is $12,000, and the lead time is 30 calendar days. The quoted gasket specification matches PR-482's technical specification."}, {"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current during evaluation, and its current certificate is attached. The required material certificate is attached. The submitted drawing bears the required signature, and the signed drawing is attached."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-273", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "705cd3052bdf64748b8250949b9404bf1efac894ae897e1c1a0f25374b6c3b6f", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved because the original questions are verbatim and both contexts retain the governing approval rules. Question bindings are preserved through PR-482, gasket capacity, and the 17 September 2026 evaluation. Evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences: \"The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.\" and \"PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units.\" The counterfactual coherently changes capacity to 640 units without creating contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A3": "supported"}, "right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship rather than a final policy classification. A3 is a factual capacity comparison and is an appropriate focus. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A3 changing: a supplier can meet or fail the capacity minimum while all other facts remain satisfied. The state-derived policy evidence preserves the thresholds, inclusive boundaries, current attachment requirement, non-waiver rule, and clarification consequence needed in addition to the automatically retained question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current-document requirement. It therefore sufficiently entails the true outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A3 entails that quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's required minimum. Since any unsatisfied stated requirement requires the false outcome, this conjunction is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The total price quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than $12,000."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The lead time quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than 30 calendar days."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The monthly gasket capacity stated in the supplier quotation for PR-482 is greater than or equal to the minimum monthly gasket capacity stated in PR-482."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current at the time the PR-482 package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The supplier's current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The required material certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "The drawing submitted for PR-482 bears the required signature at the time the package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The signed drawing is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matches the technical specification in PR-482."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Specification owner\",\"text\":\"PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"The quoted total price is $12,000, and the quoted lead time is 30 calendar days. The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current, and its current certificate is attached to the package. The required material certificate is also attached.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical reviewer\",\"text\":\"The submitted drawing bears the required signature and the signed drawing is attached to the package. The quoted gasket specification matches PR-482's technical specification.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now. technical match does not waive the attachment requirements. Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, including the permitted boundary values.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's minimum monthly capacity, so at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.", "negative_left": "The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 640 units.", "negative_right": "PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units.", "right": "PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-273-008", "id": "fast-41-diverse-273-008-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now, so do not route for approval; route for supplier clarification.", "true": "Yes — every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, so route for approval."}, "instructions": "Is the supplier bid ready to route for approval now under the stated rubric? Resolve pronouns using their nearest coherent antecedent.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units."}, {"speaker": "Specification owner", "text": "PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}, {"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "The quoted total price is $12,000, and the quoted lead time is 30 calendar days. The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current, and its current certificate is attached to the package. The required material certificate is also attached."}, {"speaker": "Technical reviewer", "text": "The submitted drawing bears the required signature and the signed drawing is attached to the package. The quoted gasket specification matches PR-482's technical specification."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now. technical match does not waive the attachment requirements. Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-273", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "705cd3052bdf64748b8250949b9404bf1efac894ae897e1c1a0f25374b6c3b6f", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy is preserved because the original questions are verbatim and both contexts retain the governing approval rules. Question bindings are preserved through PR-482, gasket capacity, and the 17 September 2026 evaluation. Evidence contains exactly two complete factual sentences: \"The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.\" and \"PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units.\" The counterfactual coherently changes capacity to 640 units without creating contradictory duplicate measurements. Neither context embeds a gold answer, answer code, rationale, proposition identifier, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "refuted", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A3": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A3": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A3": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A3": "supported"}, "right": {"A3": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship rather than a final policy classification. A3 is a factual capacity comparison and is an appropriate focus. The base and counter assignments are realizable with only A3 changing: a supplier can meet or fail the capacity minimum while all other facts remain satisfied. The state-derived policy evidence preserves the thresholds, inclusive boundaries, current attachment requirement, non-waiver rule, and clarification consequence needed in addition to the automatically retained question.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current-document requirement. It therefore sufficiently entails the true outcome.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refutation of A3 entails that quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's required minimum. Since any unsatisfied stated requirement requires the false outcome, this conjunction is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The total price quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than $12,000."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The lead time quoted by the supplier for PR-482 is no more than 30 calendar days."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The monthly gasket capacity stated in the supplier quotation for PR-482 is greater than or equal to the minimum monthly gasket capacity stated in PR-482."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current at the time the PR-482 package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "The supplier's current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "The required material certificate is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "The drawing submitted for PR-482 bears the required signature at the time the package is evaluated."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "The signed drawing is attached to the PR-482 package at the time it is evaluated."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "The gasket specification quoted by the supplier matches the technical specification in PR-482."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Specification owner\",\"text\":\"PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Procurement specialist\",\"text\":\"The quoted total price is $12,000, and the quoted lead time is 30 calendar days. The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current, and its current certificate is attached to the package. The required material certificate is also attached.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Technical reviewer\",\"text\":\"The submitted drawing bears the required signature and the signed drawing is attached to the package. The quoted gasket specification matches PR-482's technical specification.\"},{\"speaker\":\"Purchasing approver\",\"text\":\"Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now. technical match does not waive the attachment requirements. Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A3", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units."}, {"path": ["1", "text"], "text": "PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["0", "text"], "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now."}, {"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "technical match does not waive the attachment requirements."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, including the permitted boundary values.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The quoted monthly capacity is below PR-482's minimum monthly capacity, so at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 720 units.", "negative_left": "The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 640 units.", "negative_right": "PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units.", "right": "PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-273-008", "id": "fast-41-diverse-273-008-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one stated requirement is unsatisfied now, so do not route for approval; route for supplier clarification.", "true": "Yes — every commercial, capacity, certification, technical, and current attachment requirement is satisfied, so route for approval."}, "instructions": "Is the supplier bid ready to route for approval now under the stated rubric? Resolve pronouns using their nearest coherent antecedent.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "The supplier quotation for PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a monthly gasket capacity of 640 units."}, {"speaker": "Specification owner", "text": "PR-482, evaluated on 17 September 2026, states a minimum monthly gasket capacity of 680 units."}, {"speaker": "Procurement specialist", "text": "The quoted total price is $12,000, and the quoted lead time is 30 calendar days. The supplier's ISO 9001 certification is current, and its current certificate is attached to the package. The required material certificate is also attached."}, {"speaker": "Technical reviewer", "text": "The submitted drawing bears the required signature and the signed drawing is attached to the package. The quoted gasket specification matches PR-482's technical specification."}, {"speaker": "Purchasing approver", "text": "Approval requires price no more than $12,000, lead time no more than 30 calendar days, capacity at least 600/month, current ISO 9001, a material certificate, and a signed drawing—all documents attached now. technical match does not waive the attachment requirements. Packages meeting every threshold, including boundary values, may be approved. If any required document is not attached now, route the package for supplier clarification."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-273", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "705cd3052bdf64748b8250949b9404bf1efac894ae897e1c1a0f25374b6c3b6f", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy and scope. The 800 stainless valve brackets, Meridian, and approval decision bindings remain unchanged. The evidence quotes are complete factual sentences: “Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.” and “Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.” The counterfactual coherently changes only the attachment status while retaining Apex's certification. Neither context embeds an answer, label rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation, including the exact-bid-set atom. The focus atom concerns whether a certification document is attached to Apex's bid, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that attachment and are jointly coherent: Apex may hold ISO 9001 certification while either attaching or not attaching its certification document. The policy evidence preserves the substantive procurement rules originating in the original state; question-level instructions and outcome criteria need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish a complete three-bid set; Meridian satisfies every mandatory threshold and document requirement; Apex also satisfies every requirement and, at $11.50, is cheaper than Meridian at $12.00. Therefore Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish that Apex lacks the required attached certification document, so it cannot be approved; Meridian satisfies every mandatory term and has all required documents; Harbor costs $12.40 versus Meridian's $12.00; and the three bids are the complete set. Therefore Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of bids Lena is triaging for the purchase of 800 stainless valve brackets consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Meridian's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.00."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Meridian's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 24 days."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Meridian's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 1,000 units."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Meridian holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Apex's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $11.50."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Apex's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 20 days."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Apex's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 900 units."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Apex holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "Harbor's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.40."}], "base_state_json": "\"Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets.\\n\\nMandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment.\\n\\nApproval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\\n\\nThe complete bid set consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid. Meridian quotes $12.00, promises delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, holds ISO 9001 certification, and has attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment documents. Apex quotes $11.50, promises delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets. Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets. Apex also has attached quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment documents. Harbor's quoted unit price is $12.40.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"path": [], "text": "Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"path": [], "text": "Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment."}, {"path": [], "text": "Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Apex meets every mandatory threshold and documentation requirement and has a lower unit price than Meridian. Because the three named bids are the complete bid set, Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Apex lacks the required attached certification document and therefore routes to clarification rather than approval. Meridian meets every mandatory threshold, has all required documents attached, and is cheaper than Harbor; because these are the only bids, Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.", "negative_left": "Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.", "negative_right": "Document C-417 is not attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.", "right": "Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-274-002", "id": "fast-41-diverse-274-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not route Meridian for approval; instead route it elsewhere or select another bid.", "true": "Yes — route Meridian for approval as the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid."}, "instructions": "Decide whether Meridian should be routed for approval under the stated triage rule. Ignore facts not included in the mandatory terms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets.\n\nMandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment.\n\nApproval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\n\nThe complete bid set consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid. Meridian quotes $12.00, promises delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, holds ISO 9001 certification, and has attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment documents. Apex quotes $11.50, promises delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets. Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets. Apex also has attached quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment documents. Harbor's quoted unit price is $12.40."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-274", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "16f63ae79d58448e7f5b039303369a24eb8c00ec7f7d27803be448bf5450b652", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy and scope. The 800 stainless valve brackets, Meridian, and approval decision bindings remain unchanged. The evidence quotes are complete factual sentences: “Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.” and “Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.” The counterfactual coherently changes only the attachment status while retaining Apex's certification. Neither context embeds an answer, label rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation, including the exact-bid-set atom. The focus atom concerns whether a certification document is attached to Apex's bid, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that attachment and are jointly coherent: Apex may hold ISO 9001 certification while either attaching or not attaching its certification document. The policy evidence preserves the substantive procurement rules originating in the original state; question-level instructions and outcome criteria need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish a complete three-bid set; Meridian satisfies every mandatory threshold and document requirement; Apex also satisfies every requirement and, at $11.50, is cheaper than Meridian at $12.00. Therefore Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish that Apex lacks the required attached certification document, so it cannot be approved; Meridian satisfies every mandatory term and has all required documents; Harbor costs $12.40 versus Meridian's $12.00; and the three bids are the complete set. Therefore Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of bids Lena is triaging for the purchase of 800 stainless valve brackets consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Meridian's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.00."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Meridian's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 24 days."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Meridian's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 1,000 units."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Meridian holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Apex's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $11.50."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Apex's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 20 days."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Apex's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 900 units."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Apex holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "Harbor's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.40."}], "base_state_json": "\"Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets.\\n\\nMandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment.\\n\\nApproval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\\n\\nThe complete bid set consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid. Meridian quotes $12.00, promises delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, holds ISO 9001 certification, and has attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment documents. Apex quotes $11.50, promises delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets. Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets. Apex also has attached quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment documents. Harbor's quoted unit price is $12.40.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"path": [], "text": "Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"path": [], "text": "Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment."}, {"path": [], "text": "Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Apex meets every mandatory threshold and documentation requirement and has a lower unit price than Meridian. Because the three named bids are the complete bid set, Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Apex lacks the required attached certification document and therefore routes to clarification rather than approval. Meridian meets every mandatory threshold, has all required documents attached, and is cheaper than Harbor; because these are the only bids, Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.", "negative_left": "Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.", "negative_right": "Document C-417 is not attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets.", "right": "Document C-417 is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-274-002", "id": "fast-41-diverse-274-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not route Meridian for approval; instead route it elsewhere or select another bid.", "true": "Yes — route Meridian for approval as the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid."}, "instructions": "Decide whether Meridian should be routed for approval under the stated triage rule. Ignore facts not included in the mandatory terms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets.\n\nMandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment.\n\nApproval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\n\nThe complete bid set consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid. Meridian quotes $12.00, promises delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, holds ISO 9001 certification, and has attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment documents. Apex quotes $11.50, promises delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Document C-417 is the ISO 9001 certification document issued for Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets. Document C-417 is not attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets. Apex also has attached quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment documents. Harbor's quoted unit price is $12.40."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-274", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "16f63ae79d58448e7f5b039303369a24eb8c00ec7f7d27803be448bf5450b652", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy, and both contexts retain the same request, entity, path, quantity, and date bindings. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: “At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47.” and “Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 9001 certification\" in Apex's bid file.” The counterfactual coherently changes the document title to ISO 14001 while leaving Apex's separate certification claim unchanged. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation, including the exact-bid-set atom. The focus atom concerns whether a certification document is attached to Apex's bid, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that attachment and are jointly coherent: Apex may hold ISO 9001 certification while either attaching or not attaching its certification document. The policy evidence preserves the substantive procurement rules originating in the original state; question-level instructions and outcome criteria need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish a complete three-bid set; Meridian satisfies every mandatory threshold and document requirement; Apex also satisfies every requirement and, at $11.50, is cheaper than Meridian at $12.00. Therefore Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish that Apex lacks the required attached certification document, so it cannot be approved; Meridian satisfies every mandatory term and has all required documents; Harbor costs $12.40 versus Meridian's $12.00; and the three bids are the complete set. Therefore Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of bids Lena is triaging for the purchase of 800 stainless valve brackets consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Meridian's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.00."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Meridian's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 24 days."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Meridian's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 1,000 units."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Meridian holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Apex's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $11.50."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Apex's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 20 days."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Apex's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 900 units."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Apex holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "Harbor's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.40."}], "base_state_json": "\"Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets.\\n\\nMandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment.\\n\\nApproval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\\n\\nLena's complete bid set consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid. Meridian quotes $12.00, promises delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, holds ISO 9001 certification, and has an attached bid packet containing its quotation, ISO 9001 certification document, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Apex quotes $11.50, promises delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Its attached bid packet contains the quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment. At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47. Document C-47 is titled \\\"ISO 9001 certification\\\" in Apex's bid file. The quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment are included within that attached packet. Harbor quotes $12.40 for the brackets.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47."}, {"path": [], "text": "Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 9001 certification\" in Apex's bid file."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"path": [], "text": "Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment."}, {"path": [], "text": "Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Apex meets every mandatory threshold and documentation requirement and has a lower unit price than Meridian. Because the three named bids are the complete bid set, Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Apex lacks the required attached certification document and therefore routes to clarification rather than approval. Meridian meets every mandatory threshold, has all required documents attached, and is cheaper than Harbor; because these are the only bids, Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47.", "negative_left": "At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47.", "negative_right": "Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 14001 certification\" in Apex's bid file.", "right": "Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 9001 certification\" in Apex's bid file."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-274-004", "id": "fast-41-diverse-274-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not route Meridian for approval; instead route it elsewhere or select another bid.", "true": "Yes — route Meridian for approval as the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid."}, "instructions": "Decide whether Meridian should be routed for approval under the stated triage rule. Ignore facts not included in the mandatory terms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets.\n\nMandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment.\n\nApproval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\n\nLena's complete bid set consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid. Meridian quotes $12.00, promises delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, holds ISO 9001 certification, and has an attached bid packet containing its quotation, ISO 9001 certification document, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Apex quotes $11.50, promises delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Its attached bid packet contains the quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment. At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47. Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 9001 certification\" in Apex's bid file. The quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment are included within that attached packet. Harbor quotes $12.40 for the brackets."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-274", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "16f63ae79d58448e7f5b039303369a24eb8c00ec7f7d27803be448bf5450b652", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "The unchanged questions preserve the governing policy, and both contexts retain the same request, entity, path, quantity, and date bindings. The evidence consists of two complete factual sentences: “At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47.” and “Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 9001 certification\" in Apex's bid file.” The counterfactual coherently changes the document title to ISO 14001 while leaving Apex's separate certification claim unchanged. Neither context embeds an answer, code, rationale, rule table, proposition ID, or output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "supported", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a11": "supported", "a12": "supported", "a13": "supported", "a14": "refuted", "a15": "supported", "a16": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a14": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a14": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a14": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a14": "supported"}, "right": {"a14": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation, including the exact-bid-set atom. The focus atom concerns whether a certification document is attached to Apex's bid, not a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that attachment and are jointly coherent: Apex may hold ISO 9001 certification while either attaching or not attaching its certification document. The policy evidence preserves the substantive procurement rules originating in the original state; question-level instructions and outcome criteria need not be repeated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish a complete three-bid set; Meridian satisfies every mandatory threshold and document requirement; Apex also satisfies every requirement and, at $11.50, is cheaper than Meridian at $12.00. Therefore Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish that Apex lacks the required attached certification document, so it cannot be approved; Meridian satisfies every mandatory term and has all required documents; Harbor costs $12.40 versus Meridian's $12.00; and the three bids are the complete set. Therefore Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The set of bids Lena is triaging for the purchase of 800 stainless valve brackets consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Meridian's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.00."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Meridian's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 24 days."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Meridian's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 1,000 units."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "Meridian holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Meridian's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Apex's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $11.50."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Apex's promised delivery time for the 800 stainless valve brackets is 20 days."}, {"id": "a11", "statement": "Apex's monthly production capacity for stainless valve brackets is 900 units."}, {"id": "a12", "statement": "Apex holds ISO 9001 certification at the time of Lena's triage."}, {"id": "a13", "statement": "A quotation document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a14", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certification document is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a15", "statement": "A signed drawing acknowledgment is attached to Apex's bid for the 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"id": "a16", "statement": "Harbor's quoted unit price for the 800 stainless valve brackets is $12.40."}], "base_state_json": "\"Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets.\\n\\nMandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment.\\n\\nApproval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\\n\\nLena's complete bid set consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid. Meridian quotes $12.00, promises delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, holds ISO 9001 certification, and has an attached bid packet containing its quotation, ISO 9001 certification document, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Apex quotes $11.50, promises delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Its attached bid packet contains the quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment. At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47. Document C-47 is titled \\\"ISO 9001 certification\\\" in Apex's bid file. The quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment are included within that attached packet. Harbor quotes $12.40 for the brackets.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a14", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47."}, {"path": [], "text": "Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 9001 certification\" in Apex's bid file."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets."}, {"path": [], "text": "Mandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment."}, {"path": [], "text": "Approval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Apex meets every mandatory threshold and documentation requirement and has a lower unit price than Meridian. Because the three named bids are the complete bid set, Meridian is not the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Apex lacks the required attached certification document and therefore routes to clarification rather than approval. Meridian meets every mandatory threshold, has all required documents attached, and is cheaper than Harbor; because these are the only bids, Meridian is the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a14", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a16", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47.", "negative_left": "At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47.", "negative_right": "Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 14001 certification\" in Apex's bid file.", "right": "Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 9001 certification\" in Apex's bid file."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-274-004", "id": "fast-41-diverse-274-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not route Meridian for approval; instead route it elsewhere or select another bid.", "true": "Yes — route Meridian for approval as the lowest-priced fully compliant, fully documented bid."}, "instructions": "Decide whether Meridian should be routed for approval under the stated triage rule. Ignore facts not included in the mandatory terms.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Procurement specialist Lena is triaging quotations for 800 stainless valve brackets.\n\nMandatory terms are: unit price at or below $13, delivery within 30 days, monthly capacity of at least 800, ISO 9001 certification, and attached quotation, certification, and signed drawing acknowledgment.\n\nApproval goes to the lowest-priced bid meeting every term with all documents attached; missing evidence routes to clarification.\n\nLena's complete bid set consists exactly of Meridian's bid, Apex's bid, and Harbor's bid. Meridian quotes $12.00, promises delivery in 24 days, has monthly capacity of 1,000, holds ISO 9001 certification, and has an attached bid packet containing its quotation, ISO 9001 certification document, and signed drawing acknowledgment. Apex quotes $11.50, promises delivery in 20 days, has monthly capacity of 900, and holds ISO 9001 certification. Its attached bid packet contains the quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment. At Lena's 2026-09-17 triage, Apex's bid for 800 stainless valve brackets contains exactly one attached document, identified as Document C-47. Document C-47 is titled \"ISO 14001 certification\" in Apex's bid file. The quotation and signed drawing acknowledgment are included within that attached packet. Harbor quotes $12.40 for the brackets."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-274", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "16f63ae79d58448e7f5b039303369a24eb8c00ec7f7d27803be448bf5450b652", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the policy and bindings; the focus spans are complete factual sentences, including “The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.” and “Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482.”; the 420-hour counterfactual is coherent and neither context leaks an answer or label.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner. The quotation identifies Northstar Components as the supplier and lists 2,000 units at $13.60 each, five-week delivery, and weekly production capacity of 1,200 units. Northstar holds current ISO 9001 certification, and both its certificate and signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission. The laboratory record identifies sample C-731 and reports its measured endurance. Procurement is assessing the submission under the stated requirements.\",\"evidence\":[\"Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets.\",\"Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units at $13.60 each, with five-week delivery and weekly production capacity of 1,200 units.\",\"The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.\",\"Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482.\",\"Northstar Components holds current ISO 9001 certification, and its certificate and signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.", "negative_left": "The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 420 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.", "negative_right": "Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482.", "right": "Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-275-013", "id": "fast-41-diverse-275-013-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner. The quotation identifies Northstar Components as the supplier and lists 2,000 units at $13.60 each, five-week delivery, and weekly production capacity of 1,200 units. Northstar holds current ISO 9001 certification, and both its certificate and signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission. The laboratory record identifies sample C-731 and reports its measured endurance. Procurement is assessing the submission under the stated requirements.", "evidence": ["Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets.", "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units at $13.60 each, with five-week delivery and weekly production capacity of 1,200 units.", "The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.", "Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482.", "Northstar Components holds current ISO 9001 certification, and its certificate and signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the policy and bindings; the focus spans are complete factual sentences, including “The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.” and “Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482.”; the 420-hour counterfactual is coherent and neither context leaks an answer or label.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "supported", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity": "supported", "a_coating_test": "refuted", "a_delivery": "supported", "a_iso_attachment": "supported", "a_iso_status": "supported", "a_product": "supported", "a_quantity": "supported", "a_signed_quote": "supported", "a_unit_price": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_coating_test": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_coating_test": "supported"}, "right": {"a_coating_test": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship, and the focus atom is the factual ASTM B117 endurance relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with identical evidence on all other requirements while changing only whether the coating explicitly meets or fails the 500-hour threshold. Policy evidence appropriately preserves the substantive procurement requirements and explicit-support rule originating in the state; rules from the unchanged questions object need not be duplicated. Omission of a rule for target 1 is permissible because partial rule tables may abstain.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "With every other stated requirement supported and the ASTM B117 500-hour requirement refuted, a technical requirement is contradicted. The first suitability level and routing to the technical specification owner necessarily apply.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conjunction supports every stated product, quantity, price, delivery, capacity, certification, document, and coating-threshold requirement. This is sufficient for the approval-ready level; no additional unstated requirement or competing outcome remains.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_product", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets."}, {"id": "a_quantity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units."}, {"id": "a_unit_price", "statement": "The quoted unit price for PR-482 is no more than $14."}, {"id": "a_delivery", "statement": "The quoted delivery time for PR-482 is no more than six weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity", "statement": "Northstar Components’ quoted production capacity for PR-482 is at least 1,000 units weekly."}, {"id": "a_iso_status", "statement": "Northstar Components holds a current ISO 9001 certification."}, {"id": "a_iso_attachment", "statement": "Northstar Components’ current ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_signed_quote", "statement": "A signed quotation is attached to the PR-482 submission."}, {"id": "a_coating_test", "statement": "The coating on the outdoor control-box brackets offered for PR-482 has ASTM B117 salt-spray endurance of at least 500 hours."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner. The quotation identifies Northstar Components as the supplier and lists 2,000 units at $13.60 each, five-week delivery, and weekly production capacity of 1,200 units. Northstar holds current ISO 9001 certification, and both its certificate and signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission. The laboratory record identifies sample C-731 and reports its measured endurance. Procurement is assessing the submission under the stated requirements.\",\"evidence\":[\"Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets.\",\"Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units at $13.60 each, with five-week delivery and weekly production capacity of 1,200 units.\",\"The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.\",\"Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482.\",\"Northstar Components holds current ISO 9001 certification, and its certificate and signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_coating_test", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "2"], "text": "The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}], "rules": [{"justification": "All non-coating requirements are explicitly satisfied, but the required ASTM B117 endurance threshold is contradicted, so the bid is not approval-ready and must be routed to the technical specification owner.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "Every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied, so the bid is approval-ready for the purchasing approver.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_product", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_quantity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_unit_price", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_status", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_attachment", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_signed_quote", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_coating_test", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 500 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.", "negative_left": "The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 420 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.", "negative_right": "Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482.", "right": "Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-41-diverse-275-013", "id": "fast-41-diverse-275-013-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["Not approval-ready: one or more technical requirements are unsupported, ambiguous, or contradicted; route to the technical specification owner for clarification or review.", "Technically supported but not approval-ready: all technical requirements are explicit, while pricing, terms, capacity, certification, or document completeness needs commercial review or clarification.", "Approval-ready: every stated technical, commercial, capacity, certification, lead-time, and attachment requirement is explicitly satisfied; route to the purchasing approver for approval."], "instructions": "Apply the levels in ascending order. Judge only the supplied evidence. A paraphrase counts as compliance only when it unambiguously confirms the named requirement and threshold; otherwise technical verification is required.", "type": "score"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482: 2,000 outdoor control-box brackets at no more than $14 each, delivery within six weeks, capacity of 1,000 units weekly, ISO 9001 certification, and coating compliant with ASTM B117 for 500 hours. Approval requires every requirement to be explicitly supported; paraphrased technical claims that do not clearly affirm the specified test must go to the technical specification owner. The quotation identifies Northstar Components as the supplier and lists 2,000 units at $13.60 each, five-week delivery, and weekly production capacity of 1,200 units. Northstar holds current ISO 9001 certification, and both its certificate and signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission. The laboratory record identifies sample C-731 and reports its measured endurance. Procurement is assessing the submission under the stated requirements.", "evidence": ["Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers outdoor control-box brackets.", "Northstar Components’ quotation for PR-482 offers 2,000 units at $13.60 each, with five-week delivery and weekly production capacity of 1,200 units.", "The ASTM B117 laboratory report dated 14 March 2026 records 420 hours of salt-spray endurance for coating sample C-731.", "Sample C-731 is the coating applied to the outdoor control-box brackets offered by Northstar Components for PR-482.", "Northstar Components holds current ISO 9001 certification, and its certificate and signed quotation are attached to the PR-482 submission."], "request": "Choose the bid’s current suitability level and route for the purchasing approver."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-275", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "978b0ac1c0c7fceda5aef353a0d79d1284ae7bb19333f040140beacf137be3c4", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full ordered rubric and same request/entity bindings, the flagged evidence pair are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual's single change (packing sheet now confirms inclusion) removes the contradiction coherently without duplicating or contradicting other evidence, with no embedded answers or rules.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable.\",\"The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does not include a USB-C charging cable.\",\"The compliance attachment confirms the lamp's battery certification matches all listed safety and regulatory claims, with no discrepancies noted.\",\"Every required non-customer-facing catalog field, including SKU, warehouse code, and hazard classification, is populated on the submission.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does not include a USB-C charging cable."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does include a USB-C charging cable.", "right": "The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does not include a USB-C charging cable."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-007-002", "id": "fast-43-diverse-007-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable.", "The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does not include a USB-C charging cable.", "The compliance attachment confirms the lamp's battery certification matches all listed safety and regulatory claims, with no discrepancies noted.", "Every required non-customer-facing catalog field, including SKU, warehouse code, and hazard classification, is populated on the submission."], "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full ordered rubric and same request/entity bindings, the flagged evidence pair are complete factual sentences, and the counterfactual's single change (packing sheet now confirms inclusion) removes the contradiction coherently without duplicating or contradicting other evidence, with no embedded answers or rules.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\",\"evidence\":[\"The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable.\",\"The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does not include a USB-C charging cable.\",\"The compliance attachment confirms the lamp's battery certification matches all listed safety and regulatory claims, with no discrepancies noted.\",\"Every required non-customer-facing catalog field, including SKU, warehouse code, and hazard classification, is populated on the submission.\"],\"request\":\"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does not include a USB-C charging cable."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does include a USB-C charging cable.", "right": "The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does not include a USB-C charging cable."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-007-002", "id": "fast-43-diverse-007-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["The listing titled 'Cordless Desk Lamp Model CX-410' states the package includes a USB-C charging cable.", "The seller's packing sheet for Model CX-410 states the package does include a USB-C charging cable.", "The compliance attachment confirms the lamp's battery certification matches all listed safety and regulatory claims, with no discrepancies noted.", "Every required non-customer-facing catalog field, including SKU, warehouse code, and hazard classification, is populated on the submission."], "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical rubric and request, preserve the DL-880 entity/time binding, and the focus evidence pair are complete factual sentences with the counterfactual’s documentation line altered to agree with the listing (no cable/no-cable), avoiding contradiction while flipping the underlying fact; neither context states or implies the rubric outcome or any label/code.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\", \"evidence\": [\"The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable.\", \"The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states no charging cable is included in the package.\", \"Compliance attachment confirms the lamp's battery certification is consistent with the listing's stated voltage and wattage claims.\", \"Every required non-customer-facing catalog field, including SKU, weight, and warehouse code, is fully populated.\"], \"request\": \"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states no charging cable is included in the package."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states one USB-C charging cable is included in the package.", "right": "The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states no charging cable is included in the package."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-007-012", "id": "fast-43-diverse-007-012-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states no charging cable is included in the package.", "Compliance attachment confirms the lamp's battery certification is consistent with the listing's stated voltage and wattage claims.", "Every required non-customer-facing catalog field, including SKU, weight, and warehouse code, is fully populated."], "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical rubric and request, preserve the DL-880 entity/time binding, and the focus evidence pair are complete factual sentences with the counterfactual’s documentation line altered to agree with the listing (no cable/no-cable), avoiding contradiction while flipping the underlying fact; neither context states or implies the rubric outcome or any label/code.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "refuted", "a3": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a2": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a2": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a2": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a2": "supported"}, "right": {"a2": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship. The focus atom a2 is factual rather than a policy conclusion, and the base and counter assignments are realizable with only the package-contents contradiction changing. The policy evidence correctly preserves the ordered rubric originating in the original state; instructions and criteria from the questions object need not be duplicated. Both partial-table rules are sufficient for their targets.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Refuting a1 excludes the Critical condition, while supporting a2 establishes the customer-facing package-contents contradiction required for Major. Any state of a3 cannot change the outcome because Major outranks Minor.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuting a1, a2, and a3 excludes the stated Critical, Major, and Minor defect conditions, respectively, so Ready to publish is entailed.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "At least one safety or regulatory claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "At least one customer-facing package-contents claim in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing contradicts the seller documentation for that listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "At least one required non-customer-facing catalog field in the submitted cordless desk-lamp listing is missing."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.\", \"evidence\": [\"The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable.\", \"The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states no charging cable is included in the package.\", \"Compliance attachment confirms the lamp's battery certification is consistent with the listing's stated voltage and wattage claims.\", \"Every required non-customer-facing catalog field, including SKU, weight, and warehouse code, is fully populated.\"], \"request\": \"Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a2", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states no charging cable is included in the package."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published."}], "rules": [{"justification": "With no Critical contradiction and a customer-facing package-contents contradiction, the ordered rubric assigns Major and routes the listing to the marketplace seller, regardless of whether a lower-severity missing-field issue also exists.", "target": "major_seller_correction_not_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The absence of Critical, Major, and Minor defects satisfies the Ready criterion.", "target": "ready_publish", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_left": "The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "negative_right": "The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states one USB-C charging cable is included in the package.", "right": "The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states no charging cable is included in the package."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-007-012", "id": "fast-43-diverse-007-012-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_specialist_not_ready": "Not ready; Critical defect; route to the category specialist because a safety or regulatory claim contradicts documentation.", "major_seller_correction_not_ready": "Not ready; Major defect; route to the marketplace seller for correction because no Critical defect exists and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation.", "minor_support_not_ready": "Not ready; Minor defect; route to marketplace support because no Critical or Major defect exists, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing.", "ready_publish": "Ready to publish; no Critical, Major, or Minor defect is present."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one option. Apply the ordered rubric to the supplied listing fields and seller attachments, treating explicit negation in the packing sheet as decisive evidence about package contents.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace seller submitted a cordless desk-lamp listing. The catalog reviewer must assign the highest applicable severity and route. Ordered rubric: Critical—safety/regulatory contradiction, route to category specialist; Major—no Critical issue and a customer-facing package-contents claim contradicts seller documentation, route to seller correction; Minor—neither higher defect applies, but a required non-customer-facing field is missing, route to marketplace support; Ready—no defect. Only Ready listings may be published.", "evidence": ["The submitted listing for cordless desk-lamp model DL-880 states the package includes one USB-C charging cable.", "The seller documentation packing sheet for model DL-880 explicitly states one USB-C charging cable is included in the package.", "Compliance attachment confirms the lamp's battery certification is consistent with the listing's stated voltage and wattage claims.", "Every required non-customer-facing catalog field, including SKU, weight, and warehouse code, is fully populated."], "request": "Determine publication readiness, highest defect severity, and the correct route under the rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-007", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "800be01f41a36de5133a65b4ad1e1e10699dc4908e81ae3bcd55766c8a13d2b0", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "ready_publish"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same entity, category rubric, and required fields, and the single altered sentence in the counterfactual (seller's conditional authorization now tied to \"lid open\" instead of \"lid closed\") creates a non‑contradictory mismatch with the unchanged definition, not a factual contradiction; the two focus evidence spans are complete factual sentences (not rubric text) and no answer, code, or instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\": \"Marketplace seller\", \"text\": \"I submitted the Northstar Soup Maker with Capacity = 1.7 L. The attached manufacturer sheet states \\u201crated vessel volume: 1.7 L\\u201d and \\u201crecommended working fill: 1.5 L.\\u201d\"}, {\"speaker\": \"Catalog reviewer\", \"text\": \"All other required fields match the sheet and each has a single supported value. Capacity is a required core attribute used in search filters, but the category guide supplied here does not say whether capacity means rated vessel volume or working fill, so the field is conflicting and the definition is unresolved. No safety or regulatory claim in the documentation is disproved.\"}, {\"speaker\": \"Marketplace seller\", \"text\": \"Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed.\"}, {\"speaker\": \"Marketplace seller\", \"text\": \"The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid closed, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing.\"}, {\"speaker\": \"Marketplace support agent\", \"text\": \"A category specialist can determine which capacity definition applies. The listing remains unpublished while that controlled-field interpretation is pending.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid closed, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed.", "negative_left": "Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed.", "negative_right": "The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid open, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing.", "right": "The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid closed, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-008-010", "id": "fast-43-diverse-008-010-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Marketplace seller", "text": "I submitted the Northstar Soup Maker with Capacity = 1.7 L. The attached manufacturer sheet states “rated vessel volume: 1.7 L” and “recommended working fill: 1.5 L.”"}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "All other required fields match the sheet and each has a single supported value. Capacity is a required core attribute used in search filters, but the category guide supplied here does not say whether capacity means rated vessel volume or working fill, so the field is conflicting and the definition is unresolved. No safety or regulatory claim in the documentation is disproved."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace seller", "text": "Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace seller", "text": "The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid closed, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace support agent", "text": "A category specialist can determine which capacity definition applies. The listing remains unpublished while that controlled-field interpretation is pending."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_specialist_review_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same entity, category rubric, and required fields, and the single altered sentence in the counterfactual (seller's conditional authorization now tied to \"lid open\" instead of \"lid closed\") creates a non‑contradictory mismatch with the unchanged definition, not a factual contradiction; the two focus evidence spans are complete factual sentences (not rubric text) and no answer, code, or instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "refuted", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; a7 is a single universally quantified relationship over the explicit set of non-Capacity fields. The focus atom concerns the seller's factual authorization, not a policy classification. Base and counter assignments can be realized while changing only that authorization. Empty policy_evidence is correct because the governing rubric is wholly contained in the retained questions object, and no additional substantive state-originating rule is needed to interpret it.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The rule excludes the higher-priority critical outcome and establishes every specialist-review condition: two documentary-supported Capacity values, an unresolved applicable definition, and seller authorization of whichever value matches that definition.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The rule excludes a critical block, establishes a conflicting required core field, and refutes the authorization needed for specialist review. The restriction on all non-Capacity fields also prevents another field from independently satisfying the two-supported-values specialist condition. Major seller correction therefore follows under the ordered rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "For the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Capacity is a required core field for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The Capacity field in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is conflicting."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Supplied documentation for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing supports two distinct candidate Capacity values."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The category definition applicable to Capacity for the current Northstar Soup Maker listing is unresolved."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The seller who submitted the current Northstar Soup Maker listing conditionally authorizes the candidate Capacity value that matches the applicable category definition."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "For every field other than Capacity in the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, supplied evidence supports at most one candidate value."}], "base_state_json": "[{\"speaker\": \"Marketplace seller\", \"text\": \"I submitted the Northstar Soup Maker with Capacity = 1.7 L. The attached manufacturer sheet states \\u201crated vessel volume: 1.7 L\\u201d and \\u201crecommended working fill: 1.5 L.\\u201d\"}, {\"speaker\": \"Catalog reviewer\", \"text\": \"All other required fields match the sheet and each has a single supported value. Capacity is a required core attribute used in search filters, but the category guide supplied here does not say whether capacity means rated vessel volume or working fill, so the field is conflicting and the definition is unresolved. No safety or regulatory claim in the documentation is disproved.\"}, {\"speaker\": \"Marketplace seller\", \"text\": \"Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed.\"}, {\"speaker\": \"Marketplace seller\", \"text\": \"The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid closed, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing.\"}, {\"speaker\": \"Marketplace support agent\", \"text\": \"A category specialist can determine which capacity definition applies. The listing remains unpublished while that controlled-field interpretation is pending.\"}]", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["2", "text"], "text": "Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed."}, {"path": ["3", "text"], "text": "The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid closed, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "The higher-priority critical condition is explicitly excluded. Supplied evidence supports two Capacity values, the applicable Capacity definition is unresolved, and the submitting seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value, so the specialist-review condition is satisfied.", "target": "major_specialist_review_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The critical condition is explicitly excluded. Capacity is a conflicting required core field, but explicit refutation of authorization excludes specialist review for Capacity. Every other field has at most one evidence-supported candidate value, excluding any separate field from satisfying the specialist-review requirement of two supported candidate values. Seller correction therefore applies.", "target": "major_seller_correction_no", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed.", "negative_left": "Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed.", "negative_right": "The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid open, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing.", "right": "The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid closed, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-008-010", "id": "fast-43-diverse-008-010-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"critical_block_no": "Not publication-ready; critical severity and blocked because a safety or regulatory claim is directly disproved by documentation.", "major_seller_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and returned to the seller because a required core field is missing or conflicting without qualifying category ambiguity and conditional authorization.", "major_specialist_review_no": "Not publication-ready; major severity and routed to a category specialist because both values have documentary support, the category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the definition-matching value.", "minor_correction_no": "Not publication-ready; minor severity and routed for correction because the only defect is cosmetic and does not affect meaning or filtering.", "ready_publish_yes": "Publication-ready with no defect because all required fields are complete, consistent, and require no further interpretation."}, "instructions": "Choose the single triage result using this ordered rubric: (1) Critical block—documentation directly disproves a safety or regulatory claim. (2) Major specialist review—not publication-ready when supplied evidence supports two candidate values because a category definition is unresolved, and the seller conditionally authorizes the value matching that definition. (3) Major seller correction—not publication-ready when a required core field is missing or conflicting and the specialist-review condition is not met. (4) Minor correction—not publication-ready for cosmetic defects that do not change meaning or filtering. (5) Ready—every required field is complete, consistent, and needs no review.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": [{"speaker": "Marketplace seller", "text": "I submitted the Northstar Soup Maker with Capacity = 1.7 L. The attached manufacturer sheet states “rated vessel volume: 1.7 L” and “recommended working fill: 1.5 L.”"}, {"speaker": "Catalog reviewer", "text": "All other required fields match the sheet and each has a single supported value. Capacity is a required core attribute used in search filters, but the category guide supplied here does not say whether capacity means rated vessel volume or working fill, so the field is conflicting and the definition is unresolved. No safety or regulatory claim in the documentation is disproved."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace seller", "text": "Regarding the current Northstar Soup Maker listing, the applicable category definition designates Capacity as the volume measured with the lid closed."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace seller", "text": "The seller submitted a note stating that if Capacity is defined as the volume measured with the lid open, the seller authorizes that candidate Capacity value for the listing."}, {"speaker": "Marketplace support agent", "text": "A category specialist can determine which capacity definition applies. The listing remains unpublished while that controlled-field interpretation is pending."}]}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-008", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "7e2b2dbce09f280c6ab31810d8e70170dfa9825a59e1c5698440cb8bbac2a299", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "major_seller_correction_no"}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical policy paragraph and the same VT-K7/voltage-conflict request bindings; the focus evidence pair 'Seller Document A... 100-127V.' and 'Seller Document B... 220-240V./100-127V.' are complete factual sentences with no embedded rules; the counterfactual coherently removes the conflict by aligning both documents' voltage without contradicting other unchanged facts; no gold answer, code, or rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; A3 is a permissible universal claim over the explicit set of other applicable requirements. A1 is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only A1 changing. The policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating rules concerning unresolved voltage conflicts, unsupported seller statements, specialist routing, and publication blocking; the unchanged questions object automatically preserves the decision instructions and outcome criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails conflicting voltage specifications among seller documents, while refuted A2 entails that the supplied evidence does not establish reconciliation. This is an unresolved voltage conflict, which the policy expressly makes a publication-blocking Blocker requiring specialist routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuted A1 excludes disagreement among the supplied seller documents about voltage, and supported A3 establishes satisfaction of every other applicable listing requirement. Together they exclude both the specified voltage-conflict trigger and any other unmet requirement, so the negative outcome is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Among all seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, at least two specify different voltage ranges for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At least one item of supplied evidence establishes a reconciliation of a voltage difference among the seller documents for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "Every marketplace listing requirement applicable to the Voltara VT-K7 listing other than agreement among seller documents about voltage is satisfied."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A marketplace support agent asks a catalog reviewer to triage a fictional Voltara travel kettle listing. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller\\u2019s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.\", \"evidence\": [\"Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.\", \"Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 220-240V.\", \"The marketplace seller says one of the documents is outdated, but supplies no replacement certificate or revision history.\", \"All other required listing fields are complete and consistent.\"], \"request\": \"Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 220-240V."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Blockers prevent publication."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}], "rules": [{"justification": "A voltage difference exists among the supplied seller documents, and the supplied evidence does not establish a reconciliation. The conflict is therefore unresolved; the policy classifies it as a Blocker requiring category-specialist routing and preventing publication.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "No two supplied seller documents disagree about voltage, and every other applicable listing requirement is satisfied. Thus there is neither an unresolved seller-document voltage conflict nor another unmet requirement requiring specialist review or blocking publication.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "negative_left": "Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "negative_right": "Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "right": "Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 220-240V."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-010-001", "id": "fast-43-diverse-010-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not require specialist review; treat the listing as ready or eligible for ordinary correction.", "true": "Yes — route the listing to a category specialist and block publication pending resolution."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated triage policy to the supplied evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace support agent asks a catalog reviewer to triage a fictional Voltara travel kettle listing. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.", "evidence": ["Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 220-240V.", "The marketplace seller says one of the documents is outdated, but supplies no replacement certificate or revision history.", "All other required listing fields are complete and consistent."], "request": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-010", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "05d88156f46298a27351272f508360cbdc7108bb28cfd12a25195bd9e3311442", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "commerce", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical policy paragraph and the same VT-K7/voltage-conflict request bindings; the focus evidence pair 'Seller Document A... 100-127V.' and 'Seller Document B... 220-240V./100-127V.' are complete factual sentences with no embedded rules; the counterfactual coherently removes the conflict by aligning both documents' voltage without contradicting other unchanged facts; no gold answer, code, or rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "refuted", "A2": "refuted", "A3": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A1": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A1": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A1": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A1": "supported"}, "right": {"A1": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual relationship; A3 is a permissible universal claim over the explicit set of other applicable requirements. A1 is factual rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments can be realized with only A1 changing. The policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating rules concerning unresolved voltage conflicts, unsupported seller statements, specialist routing, and publication blocking; the unchanged questions object automatically preserves the decision instructions and outcome criteria.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A1 entails conflicting voltage specifications among seller documents, while refuted A2 entails that the supplied evidence does not establish reconciliation. This is an unresolved voltage conflict, which the policy expressly makes a publication-blocking Blocker requiring specialist routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Refuted A1 excludes disagreement among the supplied seller documents about voltage, and supported A3 establishes satisfaction of every other applicable listing requirement. Together they exclude both the specified voltage-conflict trigger and any other unmet requirement, so the negative outcome is sufficient.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "Among all seller documents supplied for the Voltara VT-K7 listing, at least two specify different voltage ranges for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "At least one item of supplied evidence establishes a reconciliation of a voltage difference among the seller documents for model VT-K7."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "Every marketplace listing requirement applicable to the Voltara VT-K7 listing other than agreement among seller documents about voltage is satisfied."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A marketplace support agent asks a catalog reviewer to triage a fictional Voltara travel kettle listing. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller\\u2019s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.\", \"evidence\": [\"Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.\", \"Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 220-240V.\", \"The marketplace seller says one of the documents is outdated, but supplies no replacement certificate or revision history.\", \"All other required listing fields are complete and consistent.\"], \"request\": \"Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A1", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 220-240V."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Blockers prevent publication."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}], "rules": [{"justification": "A voltage difference exists among the supplied seller documents, and the supplied evidence does not establish a reconciliation. The conflict is therefore unresolved; the policy classifies it as a Blocker requiring category-specialist routing and preventing publication.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "No two supplied seller documents disagree about voltage, and every other applicable listing requirement is satisfied. Thus there is neither an unresolved seller-document voltage conflict nor another unmet requirement requiring specialist review or blocking publication.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "negative_left": "Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "negative_right": "Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "right": "Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 220-240V."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-010-001", "id": "fast-43-diverse-010-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — do not require specialist review; treat the listing as ready or eligible for ordinary correction.", "true": "Yes — route the listing to a category specialist and block publication pending resolution."}, "instructions": "Answer yes or no by applying the stated triage policy to the supplied evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": {"context": "A marketplace support agent asks a catalog reviewer to triage a fictional Voltara travel kettle listing. Policy ranks defects Blocker > Major > Minor. Any unresolved conflict between seller documents about voltage is a Blocker and must be routed to a category specialist; a seller’s unsupported statement does not resolve it. Blockers prevent publication.", "evidence": ["Seller Document A for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "Seller Document B for the Voltara VT-K7 listing specifies a voltage range of 100-127V.", "The marketplace seller says one of the documents is outdated, but supplies no replacement certificate or revision history.", "All other required listing fields are complete and consistent."], "request": "Should the reviewer route the listing to a category specialist as a publication-blocking defect?"}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-010", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "05d88156f46298a27351272f508360cbdc7108bb28cfd12a25195bd9e3311442", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "commerce-02", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full policy text and question bindings unchanged, differing only in R-C's timestamp (08:42 vs 08:22), which is still later than R-D's 08:30, so the latest-report logic (R-C, setup complete) remains consistent in both versions; each evidence item is a factual sentence with no embedded rules, gold answers, or instructions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test; this is the only projector report before 09:00.\",\"08:15 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\",\"08:45 facilities update: exit cleared of obstruction and verified clear; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\",\"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required camera.\",\"Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the lesson.\",\"Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson.\",\"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\",\"Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.\",\"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\",\"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:22 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-003", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test; this is the only projector report before 09:00.", "08:15 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:45 facilities update: exit cleared of obstruction and verified clear; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full policy text and question bindings unchanged, differing only in R-C's timestamp (08:42 vs 08:22), which is still later than R-D's 08:30, so the latest-report logic (R-C, setup complete) remains consistent in both versions; each evidence item is a factual sentence with no embedded rules, gold answers, or instructions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test; this is the only projector report before 09:00.\",\"08:15 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\",\"08:45 facilities update: exit cleared of obstruction and verified clear; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\",\"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required camera.\",\"Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the lesson.\",\"Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson.\",\"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\",\"Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.\",\"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\",\"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:22 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-003", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test; this is the only projector report before 09:00.", "08:15 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:45 facilities update: exit cleared of obstruction and verified clear; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:22 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full original policy and question bindings; only the R-C timestamp changes (08:42 to 08:30), flipping which report is latest without creating contradictory duplicate facts, and no evidence sentence states or implies the final answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:00 inventory: 24 desks confirmed present for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\", \"08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test.\", \"08:45 facilities update: exit verified clear of obstructions.\", \"Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:42 on the day of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the document camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the document camera present and operational, with routine setup remaining.\", \"No other reports on the document camera exist before 09:00, and both reports concern the same required camera.\", \"No repair, room, safety, or unrelated setup tasks remain before 09:00, and no non-routine document-camera setup remains.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:42 on the day of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:42 on the day of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:30 on the day of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-015", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-015-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:00 inventory: 24 desks confirmed present for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test.", "08:45 facilities update: exit verified clear of obstructions.", "Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:42 on the day of the lesson.", "Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the document camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the document camera present and operational, with routine setup remaining.", "No other reports on the document camera exist before 09:00, and both reports concern the same required camera.", "No repair, room, safety, or unrelated setup tasks remain before 09:00, and no non-routine document-camera setup remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full original policy and question bindings; only the R-C timestamp changes (08:42 to 08:30), flipping which report is latest without creating contradictory duplicate facts, and no evidence sentence states or implies the final answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:00 inventory: 24 desks confirmed present for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\", \"08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test.\", \"08:45 facilities update: exit verified clear of obstructions.\", \"Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:42 on the day of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the document camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the document camera present and operational, with routine setup remaining.\", \"No other reports on the document camera exist before 09:00, and both reports concern the same required camera.\", \"No repair, room, safety, or unrelated setup tasks remain before 09:00, and no non-routine document-camera setup remains.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:42 on the day of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:42 on the day of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:30 on the day of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-015", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-015-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:00 inventory: 24 desks confirmed present for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test.", "08:45 facilities update: exit verified clear of obstructions.", "Report R-C for the document camera was logged at 08:30 on the day of the lesson.", "Report R-D for the document camera was logged at 08:37 on the day of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the document camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the document camera present and operational, with routine setup remaining.", "No other reports on the document camera exist before 09:00, and both reports concern the same required camera.", "No repair, room, safety, or unrelated setup tasks remain before 09:00, and no non-routine document-camera setup remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full policy and question bindings; the two focus evidence sentences are factual timestamped statements, the counterfactual coherently swaps R-C's timestamp to 08:32 making R-D the latest report without contradicting other evidence, and no gold answer or rule table is embedded.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"08:00 inventory: 24 desks confirmed for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed its startup test before 09:00.\",\"08:45 facilities update: exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson verified clear and unobstructed.\",\"Report R-C and report R-D constitute the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, both concerning the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"Report R-C: the required document camera is present, passed its operational test, and routine setup is complete.\",\"Report R-D: the required document camera is present, passed its operational test, but routine setup remains.\",\"Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"No equipment repair, room, or safety task remains before 09:00, and no setup task unrelated to the document camera remains.\",\"No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "6"], "text": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "7"], "text": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:32 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-019", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-019-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:00 inventory: 24 desks confirmed for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed its startup test before 09:00.", "08:45 facilities update: exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson verified clear and unobstructed.", "Report R-C and report R-D constitute the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, both concerning the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-C: the required document camera is present, passed its operational test, and routine setup is complete.", "Report R-D: the required document camera is present, passed its operational test, but routine setup remains.", "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "No equipment repair, room, or safety task remains before 09:00, and no setup task unrelated to the document camera remains.", "No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full policy and question bindings; the two focus evidence sentences are factual timestamped statements, the counterfactual coherently swaps R-C's timestamp to 08:32 making R-D the latest report without contradicting other evidence, and no gold answer or rule table is embedded.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"08:00 inventory: 24 desks confirmed for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed its startup test before 09:00.\",\"08:45 facilities update: exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson verified clear and unobstructed.\",\"Report R-C and report R-D constitute the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, both concerning the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"Report R-C: the required document camera is present, passed its operational test, and routine setup is complete.\",\"Report R-D: the required document camera is present, passed its operational test, but routine setup remains.\",\"Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"No equipment repair, room, or safety task remains before 09:00, and no setup task unrelated to the document camera remains.\",\"No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "6"], "text": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "7"], "text": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:32 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-019", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-019-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:00 inventory: 24 desks confirmed for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "08:35 technician update: projector repaired and passed its startup test before 09:00.", "08:45 facilities update: exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson verified clear and unobstructed.", "Report R-C and report R-D constitute the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00, both concerning the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-C: the required document camera is present, passed its operational test, and routine setup is complete.", "Report R-D: the required document camera is present, passed its operational test, but routine setup remains.", "Report R-C was logged at 08:32 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "No equipment repair, room, or safety task remains before 09:00, and no setup task unrelated to the document camera remains.", "No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full governing policy and lesson/time bindings; the counterfactual only changes R-D's timestamp from 08:30 to 08:55, a coherent single-fact edit that flips which report is 'latest' without contradicting other evidence; all evidence items are complete factual sentences, not policy text or rules; no gold label, code, or instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:05 report: projector passed its startup test.\", \"08:15 report: 24 desks confirmed present for the lesson.\", \"08:20 report: exit route confirmed unobstructed.\", \"Two document-camera reports exist before 09:00, R-C and R-D, both concerning the required document camera and no other equipment.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\", \"Report R-C: camera present, passed operational test, routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D: camera present, passed operational test, routine setup remains.\", \"No repair tasks, room or safety tasks, or unrelated setup tasks remain before 09:00, and no non-routine camera setup remains.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-022", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-022-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:05 report: projector passed its startup test.", "08:15 report: 24 desks confirmed present for the lesson.", "08:20 report: exit route confirmed unobstructed.", "Two document-camera reports exist before 09:00, R-C and R-D, both concerning the required document camera and no other equipment.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-C: camera present, passed operational test, routine setup complete.", "Report R-D: camera present, passed operational test, routine setup remains.", "No repair tasks, room or safety tasks, or unrelated setup tasks remain before 09:00, and no non-routine camera setup remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full governing policy and lesson/time bindings; the counterfactual only changes R-D's timestamp from 08:30 to 08:55, a coherent single-fact edit that flips which report is 'latest' without contradicting other evidence; all evidence items are complete factual sentences, not policy text or rules; no gold label, code, or instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:05 report: projector passed its startup test.\", \"08:15 report: 24 desks confirmed present for the lesson.\", \"08:20 report: exit route confirmed unobstructed.\", \"Two document-camera reports exist before 09:00, R-C and R-D, both concerning the required document camera and no other equipment.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\", \"Report R-C: camera present, passed operational test, routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D: camera present, passed operational test, routine setup remains.\", \"No repair tasks, room or safety tasks, or unrelated setup tasks remain before 09:00, and no non-routine camera setup remains.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-022", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-022-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:05 report: projector passed its startup test.", "08:15 report: 24 desks confirmed present for the lesson.", "08:20 report: exit route confirmed unobstructed.", "Two document-camera reports exist before 09:00, R-C and R-D, both concerning the required document camera and no other equipment.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-C: camera present, passed operational test, routine setup complete.", "Report R-D: camera present, passed operational test, routine setup remains.", "No repair tasks, room or safety tasks, or unrelated setup tasks remain before 09:00, and no non-routine camera setup remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical governing policy and the original question set is unchanged, preserving all bindings; the two focus evidence spans are verbatim factual timestamp sentences, not policy or instructions; the counterfactual only changes R-D's timestamp to 08:47:30, making it the later report, which is a coherent observational change (no duplicate/contradictory measurements) that shifts which report is 'latest' without altering policy or embedding any answer, rule table, or rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"Pre-09:00 readiness check for the microscopy lesson. Projector: the latest report before 09:00 confirms it passed its startup test. Desks: the latest report before 09:00 confirms 24 desks present. Exit: the latest report before 09:00 confirms the exit is unobstructed. Document camera: two timestamped reports exist before 09:00, R-C and R-D, both concerning the required document camera. Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson. Report R-D is timestamped 08:41:55 on the morning of the lesson. Report R-C records the camera present, operationally tested, and routine setup complete. Report R-D records the camera present, operationally tested, but routine setup not yet complete. No equipment repair task remains before 09:00. No room or safety task remains before 09:00. No setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before the lesson. No non-routine document-camera setup task remains before the lesson.\", \"policy\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:41:55 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:47:30 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:41:55 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-023", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-023-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Pre-09:00 readiness check for the microscopy lesson. Projector: the latest report before 09:00 confirms it passed its startup test. Desks: the latest report before 09:00 confirms 24 desks present. Exit: the latest report before 09:00 confirms the exit is unobstructed. Document camera: two timestamped reports exist before 09:00, R-C and R-D, both concerning the required document camera. Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson. Report R-D is timestamped 08:41:55 on the morning of the lesson. Report R-C records the camera present, operationally tested, and routine setup complete. Report R-D records the camera present, operationally tested, but routine setup not yet complete. No equipment repair task remains before 09:00. No room or safety task remains before 09:00. No setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before the lesson. No non-routine document-camera setup task remains before the lesson.", "policy": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical governing policy and the original question set is unchanged, preserving all bindings; the two focus evidence spans are verbatim factual timestamp sentences, not policy or instructions; the counterfactual only changes R-D's timestamp to 08:47:30, making it the later report, which is a coherent observational change (no duplicate/contradictory measurements) that shifts which report is 'latest' without altering policy or embedding any answer, rule table, or rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"Pre-09:00 readiness check for the microscopy lesson. Projector: the latest report before 09:00 confirms it passed its startup test. Desks: the latest report before 09:00 confirms 24 desks present. Exit: the latest report before 09:00 confirms the exit is unobstructed. Document camera: two timestamped reports exist before 09:00, R-C and R-D, both concerning the required document camera. Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson. Report R-D is timestamped 08:41:55 on the morning of the lesson. Report R-C records the camera present, operationally tested, and routine setup complete. Report R-D records the camera present, operationally tested, but routine setup not yet complete. No equipment repair task remains before 09:00. No room or safety task remains before 09:00. No setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before the lesson. No non-routine document-camera setup task remains before the lesson.\", \"policy\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["context"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:41:55 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:47:30 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:41:55 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-023", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-023-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "Pre-09:00 readiness check for the microscopy lesson. Projector: the latest report before 09:00 confirms it passed its startup test. Desks: the latest report before 09:00 confirms 24 desks present. Exit: the latest report before 09:00 confirms the exit is unobstructed. Document camera: two timestamped reports exist before 09:00, R-C and R-D, both concerning the required document camera. Report R-C is timestamped 08:42:10 on the morning of the lesson. Report R-D is timestamped 08:47:30 on the morning of the lesson. Report R-C records the camera present, operationally tested, and routine setup complete. Report R-D records the camera present, operationally tested, but routine setup not yet complete. No equipment repair task remains before 09:00. No room or safety task remains before 09:00. No setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before the lesson. No non-routine document-camera setup task remains before the lesson.", "policy": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain identical policy and requirement definitions, and the original questions object is unchanged, so entity/path/time bindings and criteria are preserved; the only altered fact is the R-D timestamp (08:39:55\\u219208:50:30), a single coherent factual change that flips which report is 'latest' without contradicting other evidence; both focus spans are complete factual sentences with timestamps and no policy or answer text; neither context states or implies the readiness label, routing choice, or any rule/answer code, avoiding leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:00 inventory: 24 desks present, projector present, document camera present.\", \"08:05 projector diagnostic: startup test passed.\", \"08:15 desk count reconfirmed at 24 for the microscopy lesson.\", \"08:20 exit inspection: pathway unobstructed and confirmed clear.\", \"Document camera reports: Report R-C and Report R-D are the only two timestamped document-camera reports on file before 09:00, and both concern the camera required for this lesson. Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson. Report R-C states the camera is present, passed its operational test, and routine setup is complete. Report R-D was logged at 08:39:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson. Report R-D states the camera is present, passed its operational test, but routine setup remains.\", \"No repair tickets, room tasks, or safety tasks remain open for this lesson.\", \"No setup task unrelated to the document camera remains, and no non-routine camera setup task remains.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-D was logged at 08:39:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:50:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:39:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-037", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-037-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:00 inventory: 24 desks present, projector present, document camera present.", "08:05 projector diagnostic: startup test passed.", "08:15 desk count reconfirmed at 24 for the microscopy lesson.", "08:20 exit inspection: pathway unobstructed and confirmed clear.", "Document camera reports: Report R-C and Report R-D are the only two timestamped document-camera reports on file before 09:00, and both concern the camera required for this lesson. Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson. Report R-C states the camera is present, passed its operational test, and routine setup is complete. Report R-D was logged at 08:39:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson. Report R-D states the camera is present, passed its operational test, but routine setup remains.", "No repair tickets, room tasks, or safety tasks remain open for this lesson.", "No setup task unrelated to the document camera remains, and no non-routine camera setup task remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain identical policy and requirement definitions, and the original questions object is unchanged, so entity/path/time bindings and criteria are preserved; the only altered fact is the R-D timestamp (08:39:55\\u219208:50:30), a single coherent factual change that flips which report is 'latest' without contradicting other evidence; both focus spans are complete factual sentences with timestamps and no policy or answer text; neither context states or implies the readiness label, routing choice, or any rule/answer code, avoiding leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:00 inventory: 24 desks present, projector present, document camera present.\", \"08:05 projector diagnostic: startup test passed.\", \"08:15 desk count reconfirmed at 24 for the microscopy lesson.\", \"08:20 exit inspection: pathway unobstructed and confirmed clear.\", \"Document camera reports: Report R-C and Report R-D are the only two timestamped document-camera reports on file before 09:00, and both concern the camera required for this lesson. Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson. Report R-C states the camera is present, passed its operational test, and routine setup is complete. Report R-D was logged at 08:39:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson. Report R-D states the camera is present, passed its operational test, but routine setup remains.\", \"No repair tickets, room tasks, or safety tasks remain open for this lesson.\", \"No setup task unrelated to the document camera remains, and no non-routine camera setup task remains.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-D was logged at 08:39:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:50:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:39:55 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-037", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-037-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:00 inventory: 24 desks present, projector present, document camera present.", "08:05 projector diagnostic: startup test passed.", "08:15 desk count reconfirmed at 24 for the microscopy lesson.", "08:20 exit inspection: pathway unobstructed and confirmed clear.", "Document camera reports: Report R-C and Report R-D are the only two timestamped document-camera reports on file before 09:00, and both concern the camera required for this lesson. Report R-C was logged at 08:42:10 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson. Report R-C states the camera is present, passed its operational test, and routine setup is complete. Report R-D was logged at 08:50:30 on the morning of the 09:00 microscopy lesson. Report R-D states the camera is present, passed its operational test, but routine setup remains.", "No repair tickets, room tasks, or safety tasks remain open for this lesson.", "No setup task unrelated to the document camera remains, and no non-routine camera setup task remains."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical governing policy and request scope; the counterfactual only changes R-D's timestamp from 08:37 to 08:55, making R-D the latest camera report instead of R-C, which is a coherent single-fact change consistent with the 'latest timestamped report' rule without contradicting other observations; the focus evidence sentences are plain factual timestamp statements, not policy or answer text; neither context states a readiness level, routing decision, or gold label.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"observations\":[\"The latest projector report before 09:00 records that the projector passed its startup test.\",\"The latest desk report before 09:00 records 24 desks present.\",\"The latest exit report before 09:00 records the exit unobstructed.\",\"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, exist before 09:00, both concerning the required document camera.\",\"Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"Report R-D was timestamped at 08:37 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\",\"Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup remaining.\",\"No repair task, room or safety task, or unrelated setup task remains before 09:00.\",\"No non-routine camera setup task remains before 09:00.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["observations", "4"], "text": "Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"path": ["observations", "5"], "text": "Report R-D was timestamped at 08:37 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was timestamped at 08:55 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "right": "Report R-D was timestamped at 08:37 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-045", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-045-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "observations": ["The latest projector report before 09:00 records that the projector passed its startup test.", "The latest desk report before 09:00 records 24 desks present.", "The latest exit report before 09:00 records the exit unobstructed.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, exist before 09:00, both concerning the required document camera.", "Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-D was timestamped at 08:37 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or unrelated setup task remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine camera setup task remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical governing policy and request scope; the counterfactual only changes R-D's timestamp from 08:37 to 08:55, making R-D the latest camera report instead of R-C, which is a coherent single-fact change consistent with the 'latest timestamped report' rule without contradicting other observations; the focus evidence sentences are plain factual timestamp statements, not policy or answer text; neither context states a readiness level, routing decision, or gold label.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"observations\":[\"The latest projector report before 09:00 records that the projector passed its startup test.\",\"The latest desk report before 09:00 records 24 desks present.\",\"The latest exit report before 09:00 records the exit unobstructed.\",\"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, exist before 09:00, both concerning the required document camera.\",\"Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"Report R-D was timestamped at 08:37 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.\",\"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\",\"Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup remaining.\",\"No repair task, room or safety task, or unrelated setup task remains before 09:00.\",\"No non-routine camera setup task remains before 09:00.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["observations", "4"], "text": "Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"path": ["observations", "5"], "text": "Report R-D was timestamped at 08:37 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was timestamped at 08:55 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "right": "Report R-D was timestamped at 08:37 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-045", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-045-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "observations": ["The latest projector report before 09:00 records that the projector passed its startup test.", "The latest desk report before 09:00 records 24 desks present.", "The latest exit report before 09:00 records the exit unobstructed.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, exist before 09:00, both concerning the required document camera.", "Report R-C was timestamped at 08:42 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-D was timestamped at 08:55 on the day of the 09:00 microscopy lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or unrelated setup task remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine camera setup task remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same policy, rubric, and routing rules, and the original question is unchanged; the counterfactual only swaps R-C's timestamp from 08:42 to 08:31, making R-D the later report instead of R-C, which is a coherent single-fact change with no duplicate or contradictory measurements; the two focus evidence lines are plain factual timestamp statements, not policy text; neither context reveals the answer, a rule table, or rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:00 inventory confirms 24 desks present and exit unobstructed at the latest check.\", \"08:35 technician update confirms the projector passed its startup test after an earlier repair, and this is the latest projector report before 09:00.\", \"Two timestamped document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the complete set available before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the same day.\", \"Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and its routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00, and no non-routine camera setup task remains either.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the same day."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the same day.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:31 on the same day.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day.", "right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-046", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-046-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:00 inventory confirms 24 desks present and exit unobstructed at the latest check.", "08:35 technician update confirms the projector passed its startup test after an earlier repair, and this is the latest projector report before 09:00.", "Two timestamped document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the complete set available before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the same day.", "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and its routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00, and no non-routine camera setup task remains either."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same policy, rubric, and routing rules, and the original question is unchanged; the counterfactual only swaps R-C's timestamp from 08:42 to 08:31, making R-D the later report instead of R-C, which is a coherent single-fact change with no duplicate or contradictory measurements; the two focus evidence lines are plain factual timestamp statements, not policy text; neither context reveals the answer, a rule table, or rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:00 inventory confirms 24 desks present and exit unobstructed at the latest check.\", \"08:35 technician update confirms the projector passed its startup test after an earlier repair, and this is the latest projector report before 09:00.\", \"Two timestamped document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the complete set available before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the same day.\", \"Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and its routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00, and no non-routine camera setup task remains either.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the same day."}, {"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:42 on the same day.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was logged at 08:31 on the same day.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day.", "right": "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-046", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-046-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:00 inventory confirms 24 desks present and exit unobstructed at the latest check.", "08:35 technician update confirms the projector passed its startup test after an earlier repair, and this is the latest projector report before 09:00.", "Two timestamped document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the complete set available before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C was logged at 08:31 on the same day.", "Report R-D was logged at 08:37 on the same day.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and its routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00, and no non-routine camera setup task remains either."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy text and question object are unchanged verbatim in both contexts; the only edit is R-D's timestamp shifting from 08:37 to 08:52, which flips which report is 'latest' without contradicting any other stated fact, yielding a coherent single-sentence counterfactual; both focus_evidence spans are complete factual sentences quoting exact timestamps; neither context states or hints at the intended readiness label, routing, or proceed/hold decision, only raw facts.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"log\":\"08:00 inventory confirmed 24 desks, projector, and document camera present. 08:10 status noted the projector failed its startup test; 08:35 technician update recorded it repaired and passing startup test. 08:30 exit check found the exit unobstructed. Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, together form the complete pre-09:00 record for the camera, each confirming the camera is present and passed its operational test, though R-C notes routine setup complete while R-D notes routine setup still remains. Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson. Report R-D was timestamped 08:37 on the day of the lesson. No repair, room, safety, or unrelated setup tasks remain outstanding for this lesson.\",\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["log"], "text": "Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson."}, {"path": ["log"], "text": "Report R-D was timestamped 08:37 on the day of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was timestamped 08:52 on the day of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D was timestamped 08:37 on the day of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-054", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-054-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "log": "08:00 inventory confirmed 24 desks, projector, and document camera present. 08:10 status noted the projector failed its startup test; 08:35 technician update recorded it repaired and passing startup test. 08:30 exit check found the exit unobstructed. Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, together form the complete pre-09:00 record for the camera, each confirming the camera is present and passed its operational test, though R-C notes routine setup complete while R-D notes routine setup still remains. Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson. Report R-D was timestamped 08:37 on the day of the lesson. No repair, room, safety, or unrelated setup tasks remain outstanding for this lesson.", "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Policy text and question object are unchanged verbatim in both contexts; the only edit is R-D's timestamp shifting from 08:37 to 08:52, which flips which report is 'latest' without contradicting any other stated fact, yielding a coherent single-sentence counterfactual; both focus_evidence spans are complete factual sentences quoting exact timestamps; neither context states or hints at the intended readiness label, routing, or proceed/hold decision, only raw facts.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"log\":\"08:00 inventory confirmed 24 desks, projector, and document camera present. 08:10 status noted the projector failed its startup test; 08:35 technician update recorded it repaired and passing startup test. 08:30 exit check found the exit unobstructed. Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, together form the complete pre-09:00 record for the camera, each confirming the camera is present and passed its operational test, though R-C notes routine setup complete while R-D notes routine setup still remains. Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson. Report R-D was timestamped 08:37 on the day of the lesson. No repair, room, safety, or unrelated setup tasks remain outstanding for this lesson.\",\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["log"], "text": "Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson."}, {"path": ["log"], "text": "Report R-D was timestamped 08:37 on the day of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D was timestamped 08:52 on the day of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D was timestamped 08:37 on the day of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-054", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-054-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "log": "08:00 inventory confirmed 24 desks, projector, and document camera present. 08:10 status noted the projector failed its startup test; 08:35 technician update recorded it repaired and passing startup test. 08:30 exit check found the exit unobstructed. Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, together form the complete pre-09:00 record for the camera, each confirming the camera is present and passed its operational test, though R-C notes routine setup complete while R-D notes routine setup still remains. Report R-C was timestamped 08:41 on the day of the lesson. Report R-D was timestamped 08:52 on the day of the lesson. No repair, room, safety, or unrelated setup tasks remain outstanding for this lesson.", "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain identical policy and question bindings; the counterfactual only changes R-C's timestamp from 08:47 to 08:19, making R-D the latest report and shifting which camera outcome applies, a coherent single-fact change without contradictions or leaked answers.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"08:50 technician log: projector passed startup test; no later projector report exists before 09:00.\",\"08:05 room count: 24 desks confirmed present for the microscopy lesson; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\",\"08:55 facilities note: exit path checked and found unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\",\"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, form the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\",\"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\",\"Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.\",\"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\",\"Report R-D records the camera present, operational, with routine setup still remaining.\",\"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\",\"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:19 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-055", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-055-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:50 technician log: projector passed startup test; no later projector report exists before 09:00.", "08:05 room count: 24 desks confirmed present for the microscopy lesson; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:55 facilities note: exit path checked and found unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, form the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present, operational, with routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain identical policy and question bindings; the counterfactual only changes R-C's timestamp from 08:47 to 08:19, making R-D the latest report and shifting which camera outcome applies, a coherent single-fact change without contradictions or leaked answers.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\",\"evidence\":[\"08:50 technician log: projector passed startup test; no later projector report exists before 09:00.\",\"08:05 room count: 24 desks confirmed present for the microscopy lesson; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\",\"08:55 facilities note: exit path checked and found unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\",\"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, form the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\",\"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\",\"Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.\",\"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\",\"Report R-D records the camera present, operational, with routine setup still remaining.\",\"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\",\"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"],\"request\":\"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:19 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-055", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-055-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:50 technician log: projector passed startup test; no later projector report exists before 09:00.", "08:05 room count: 24 desks confirmed present for the microscopy lesson; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:55 facilities note: exit path checked and found unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, form the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:19 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present, operational, with routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain identical policy text and the original question object is unchanged, preserving all governing rules and bindings; the two focus evidence sentences are factual timestamp statements, not policy or instructions; the counterfactual only shifts R-C's timestamp from 08:47 to 08:33, making R-D (08:39) the latest report, a coherent single-fact change that does not contradict other evidence; no gold answer, rule table, or output instructions are embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:28 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.\", \"08:12 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:50 facilities update: exit cleared of boxes and verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the document camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the document camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-056", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-056-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:28 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.", "08:12 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:50 facilities update: exit cleared of boxes and verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the document camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the document camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain identical policy text and the original question object is unchanged, preserving all governing rules and bindings; the two focus evidence sentences are factual timestamp statements, not policy or instructions; the counterfactual only shifts R-C's timestamp from 08:47 to 08:33, making R-D (08:39) the latest report, a coherent single-fact change that does not contradict other evidence; no gold answer, rule table, or output instructions are embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:28 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.\", \"08:12 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:50 facilities update: exit cleared of boxes and verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the document camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the document camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-056", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-056-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:28 technician update: projector repaired and passed startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.", "08:12 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:50 facilities update: exit cleared of boxes and verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the document camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the document camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical policy text and request scope, only the R-C timestamp changes (08:47→08:31), which coherently swaps which document-camera report is 'latest' without contradicting the fixed R-D timestamp or any other evidence, and neither context states a readiness level, routing choice, or instructs the classifier.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:20 technician update: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.\", \"08:05 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:50 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, form the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:31 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-057", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-057-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:20 technician update: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.", "08:05 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:50 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, form the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the identical policy text and request scope, only the R-C timestamp changes (08:47→08:31), which coherently swaps which document-camera report is 'latest' without contradicting the fixed R-D timestamp or any other evidence, and neither context states a readiness level, routing choice, or instructs the classifier.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:20 technician update: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.\", \"08:05 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:50 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, form the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:31 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-057", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-057-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:20 technician update: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.", "08:05 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:50 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, form the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:31 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the document camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the document camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain identical governing policy and question bindings; only the R-C timestamp changes (08:47→08:29), flipping which camera report is latest without contradicting other measurements; all evidence sentences are complete factual statements with no embedded answers or rule tables.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:20 technician log: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.\", \"08:05 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:50 facilities note: exit found unobstructed and verified clear; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the camera required for this lesson.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:29 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-058", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-058-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:20 technician log: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.", "08:05 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:50 facilities note: exit found unobstructed and verified clear; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the camera required for this lesson.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain identical governing policy and question bindings; only the R-C timestamp changes (08:47→08:29), flipping which camera report is latest without contradicting other measurements; all evidence sentences are complete factual statements with no embedded answers or rule tables.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:20 technician log: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.\", \"08:05 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:50 facilities note: exit found unobstructed and verified clear; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the camera required for this lesson.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:29 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-058", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-058-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:20 technician log: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report filed before 09:00.", "08:05 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:50 facilities note: exit found unobstructed and verified clear; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the complete set of camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the camera required for this lesson.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:29 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:35 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full policy and question bindings; the counterfactual changes only R-C's timestamp from 08:47 to 08:31, making R-D the later report and flipping the readiness outcome without contradicting other evidence or leaking an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:20 technician update: projector passed startup test; no later projector report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:10 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:50 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:31 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-059", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-059-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:20 technician update: projector passed startup test; no later projector report exists before 09:00.", "08:10 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:50 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full policy and question bindings; the counterfactual changes only R-C's timestamp from 08:47 to 08:31, making R-D the later report and flipping the readiness outcome without contradicting other evidence or leaking an answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:20 technician update: projector passed startup test; no later projector report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:10 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:50 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:31 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-059", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-059-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:20 technician update: projector passed startup test; no later projector report exists before 09:00.", "08:10 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:50 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:31 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:39 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present, operational, but routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy statement and rubric verbatim, and the unchanged questions object preserves all criteria; entities, times, and requirement path bindings match the original. The two focus evidence sentences are plain factual timestamp statements, not policy or rule text. The counterfactual changes only R-C's timestamp from 08:47 to 08:29, a single coherent factual edit that flips which camera report is 'latest' without contradicting any other evidence. Neither context contains a gold label, rule table, or instruction revealing the intended output.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:50 technician update: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report before 09:00.\", \"08:20 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:52 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:29 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-060", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-060-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:50 technician update: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report before 09:00.", "08:20 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:52 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy statement and rubric verbatim, and the unchanged questions object preserves all criteria; entities, times, and requirement path bindings match the original. The two focus evidence sentences are plain factual timestamp statements, not policy or rule text. The counterfactual changes only R-C's timestamp from 08:47 to 08:29, a single coherent factual edit that flips which camera report is 'latest' without contradicting any other evidence. Neither context contains a gold label, rule table, or instruction revealing the intended output.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "supported", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A10": "supported", "A11": "supported", "A12": "supported", "A13": "supported", "A14": "supported", "A15": "supported", "A16": "refuted", "A17": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported", "A5": "supported", "A6": "supported", "A7": "supported", "A8": "supported", "A9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A16": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A16": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A16": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A16": "supported"}, "right": {"A16": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relation; set identity, universal report scope, and no-task propositions remain atomic under the stated standard. A16 is a factual timestamp-order relation rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on A16 and are realizable: in the base R-C is later, while in the counter R-D is later; the differing report contents can reflect a later completion or a later recurrence of routine setup. Policy evidence preserves the substantive state-originating requirements, timestamp rule, readiness definitions, and routing rules. The unchanged questions automatically preserve their own criteria and instructions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "A4–A5 establish that R-C and R-D are all relevant pre-09:00 camera reports, and supported A16 makes R-C the latest. R-C verifies camera presence, operation, and completed routine setup. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, while A12–A14 and A17 exclude remaining repair, safety/room, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera tasks. These conditions sufficiently exclude the Low, Medium, and Unverified outcomes and entail High readiness with no routing.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With A15 supported and A16 refuted, R-C and R-D have unequal timestamps and R-C is not later, so R-D is the latest. R-D verifies camera presence and operation while recording that routine camera setup remains. A1–A3 verify the other requirements, and A12–A14 plus A17 exclude safety, core-equipment, repair, unrelated setup, and non-routine camera gaps. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which entails Medium readiness and routing to the teaching assistant.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The latest timestamped projector report available before 09:00 records that the projector required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson passed its startup test."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The latest timestamped desk report available before 09:00 records 24 desks for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The latest timestamped exit report available before 09:00 records that the exit for the 09:00 microscopy lesson is unobstructed."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 consists of report R-C and report R-D."}, {"id": "A5", "statement": "Every report in the complete set of timestamped document-camera reports available before 09:00 concerns the document camera required for the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A6", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A7", "statement": "Report R-C records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A8", "statement": "Report R-C records that routine setup of the required document camera is complete."}, {"id": "A9", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera is present."}, {"id": "A10", "statement": "Report R-D records that the required document camera passed its operational test."}, {"id": "A11", "statement": "Report R-D records that routine setup of the required document camera remains."}, {"id": "A12", "statement": "No equipment repair task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A13", "statement": "No room or safety task for the 09:00 microscopy lesson remains before 09:00."}, {"id": "A14", "statement": "No setup task unrelated to the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}, {"id": "A15", "statement": "The timestamps of report R-C and report R-D are unequal."}, {"id": "A16", "statement": "Report R-C has a later timestamp than report R-D."}, {"id": "A17", "statement": "No non-routine setup task for the required document camera remains before the 09:00 microscopy lesson."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.\", \"evidence\": [\"08:50 technician update: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report before 09:00.\", \"08:20 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.\", \"08:52 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.\", \"Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.\", \"Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.\", \"Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.\", \"Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.\", \"No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.\", \"No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00.\"], \"request\": \"Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "A16", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "4"], "text": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson."}, {"path": ["evidence", "5"], "text": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant."}, {"path": ["request"], "text": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}], "rules": [{"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 report set for the required document camera, and R-C is later. The latest camera report therefore verifies the camera's presence, operation, and completed routine setup. The latest reports also verify the working projector, 24 desks, and unobstructed exit. No repair or room or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Therefore every requirement is verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "target": "Proceed — High; no remaining routing", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "R-C and R-D are the complete pre-09:00 camera-report set. Their timestamps are unequal, and R-C is not later than R-D, so R-D is the latest camera report. R-D verifies that the camera is present and operational but that its routine setup remains. The projector, desk count, and exit are verified; no repair, room, or safety task remains; no setup task unrelated to the camera remains; and no non-routine camera setup remains. Thus only routine document-camera setup remains, which routes to the teaching assistant and yields Medium readiness.", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A10", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A11", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A12", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A13", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A14", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A15", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A16", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "A17", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:47 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_left": "Report R-C is timestamped 08:29 on the morning of the lesson.", "negative_right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "right": "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-079-060", "id": "fast-43-diverse-079-060-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"Hold — Low; route technology and facilities": "Choose only if a core equipment failure and a safety obstruction remain unresolved at the latest timestamps.", "Hold — Unverified; request updated reports": "Choose only if the available evidence lacks timestamped verification for one or more required items, preventing a defensible readiness rating.", "Proceed — High; no remaining routing": "Choose only if all lesson requirements are verified complete before 09:00 and no setup, repair, or safety task remains.", "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant": "Choose only if all safety and core-equipment issues are resolved but routine document-camera setup still remains."}, "instructions": "Apply the stated timestamp rule and readiness rubric. Select exactly one outcome whose proceed/hold decision, remaining-task routing, and readiness rating all match the evidence.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "For a 09:00 microscopy lesson, the classroom instructor requires a working projector, document camera, 24 desks, and an unobstructed exit. Use the latest timestamped report for each item. Readiness is High if every requirement is verified by 09:00; Medium if only routine setup remains with no safety or core-equipment gap; Low if core equipment or safety remains unresolved. Equipment repairs route to the instructional technology technician, room or safety work to the facilities coordinator, and routine connections to the teaching assistant.", "evidence": ["08:50 technician update: projector passed its startup test; this is the only projector report before 09:00.", "08:20 facilities count: 24 desks confirmed present for the room; no later desk report exists before 09:00.", "08:52 facilities update: exit verified unobstructed; no later exit report exists before 09:00.", "Two document-camera reports, R-C and R-D, are the only camera reports filed before 09:00, and both concern the required document camera.", "Report R-C is timestamped 08:29 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-D is timestamped 08:33 on the morning of the lesson.", "Report R-C records the camera present, operational, and routine setup complete.", "Report R-D records the camera present and operational, with routine setup still remaining.", "No repair task, room or safety task, or setup task unrelated to the camera remains before 09:00.", "No non-routine setup task for the camera remains before 09:00."], "request": "Decide whether the session can proceed, identify any remaining task routing, and assign the readiness level."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-079", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "3e5a29772f7d0ce97a110def6365c704fe5bca408c103f36f35024327384506a", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "Proceed — Medium; route camera setup to teaching assistant"}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the readiness policy via the unchanged question and add only factual equipment/status details without embedding rules or answers; the counterfactual coherently changes DC-7's status to 'awaiting inspection' without contradicting other unchanged facts; evidence spans are two complete factual sentences about the equipment log and maintenance status.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students, requiring 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other requirements listed. The room inventory confirms 12 microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing equipment present. The teaching assistant's checklist confirms all microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing operational. The equipment log for Mara\\u2019s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7. Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \\\"tested.\\\" Facilities confirms desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The equipment log for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7."}, {"path": [], "text": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \"tested.\""}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The equipment log for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7.", "negative_left": "The equipment log for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7.", "negative_right": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \"awaiting inspection.\"", "right": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \"tested.\""}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-081-014", "id": "fast-43-diverse-081-014-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students, requiring 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other requirements listed. The room inventory confirms 12 microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing equipment present. The teaching assistant's checklist confirms all microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing operational. The equipment log for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7. Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \"tested.\" Facilities confirms desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the readiness policy via the unchanged question and add only factual equipment/status details without embedding rules or answers; the counterfactual coherently changes DC-7's status to 'awaiting inspection' without contradicting other unchanged facts; evidence spans are two complete factual sentences about the equipment log and maintenance status.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students, requiring 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other requirements listed. The room inventory confirms 12 microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing equipment present. The teaching assistant's checklist confirms all microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing operational. The equipment log for Mara\\u2019s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7. Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \\\"tested.\\\" Facilities confirms desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The equipment log for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7."}, {"path": [], "text": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \"tested.\""}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The equipment log for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7.", "negative_left": "The equipment log for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7.", "negative_right": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \"awaiting inspection.\"", "right": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \"tested.\""}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-081-014", "id": "fast-43-diverse-081-014-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students, requiring 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other requirements listed. The room inventory confirms 12 microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing equipment present. The teaching assistant's checklist confirms all microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing operational. The equipment log for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 lists a document camera identified as unit DC-7. Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status field as \"awaiting inspection.\" Facilities confirms desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same entities, time, and room while preserving the rubric via the unchanged question; the two evidence sentences are plain factual statements; the counterfactual swaps the camera's status coherently without contradicting other facts; no gold answer or rule text is embedded.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. The session requires 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other equipment listed. The room inventory confirms 12 microscopes, one document camera, and active video conferencing capability. The teaching assistant's checklist certifies that all 12 microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing as operational. The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451. The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as tested and functional. Facilities confirms desks, outlets, and lighting are ready for the session.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451."}, {"path": [], "text": "The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as tested and functional."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451.", "negative_left": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451.", "negative_right": "The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as awaiting repair, not tested or operational.", "right": "The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as tested and functional."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-081-016", "id": "fast-43-diverse-081-016-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. The session requires 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other equipment listed. The room inventory confirms 12 microscopes, one document camera, and active video conferencing capability. The teaching assistant's checklist certifies that all 12 microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing as operational. The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451. The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as tested and functional. Facilities confirms desks, outlets, and lighting are ready for the session."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same entities, time, and room while preserving the rubric via the unchanged question; the two evidence sentences are plain factual statements; the counterfactual swaps the camera's status coherently without contradicting other facts; no gold answer or rule text is embedded.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. The session requires 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other equipment listed. The room inventory confirms 12 microscopes, one document camera, and active video conferencing capability. The teaching assistant's checklist certifies that all 12 microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing as operational. The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451. The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as tested and functional. Facilities confirms desks, outlets, and lighting are ready for the session.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451."}, {"path": [], "text": "The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as tested and functional."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451.", "negative_left": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451.", "negative_right": "The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as awaiting repair, not tested or operational.", "right": "The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as tested and functional."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-081-016", "id": "fast-43-diverse-081-016-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. The session requires 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other equipment listed. The room inventory confirms 12 microscopes, one document camera, and active video conferencing capability. The teaching assistant's checklist certifies that all 12 microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing as operational. The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 is logged under asset tag DC-451. The maintenance log for asset tag DC-451 dated this morning records its status as awaiting repair, not tested or operational. Facilities confirms desks, outlets, and lighting are ready for the session."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original rubric via the unchanged questions object and add only factual equipment-log/maintenance details, not policy text; the two focus sentences are complete factual statements, not instructions; the counterfactual merely swaps 'operational' to 'awaiting repair' for Unit DC-7 without contradicting other stated facts (microscopes, video conferencing, facilities); no gold answer, rule table, or output instruction is embedded in either context; entity, room, time, and requirement bindings match the original question.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. It requires 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other requirements. The room inventory lists all 12 microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing capability. The teaching assistant's checklist confirms all microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing as operational. Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7. Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as operational. The facilities coordinator confirms desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7."}, {"path": [], "text": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as operational."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7.", "negative_left": "Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7.", "negative_right": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as awaiting repair.", "right": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as operational."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-081-019", "id": "fast-43-diverse-081-019-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. It requires 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other requirements. The room inventory lists all 12 microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing capability. The teaching assistant's checklist confirms all microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing as operational. Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7. Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as operational. The facilities coordinator confirms desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original rubric via the unchanged questions object and add only factual equipment-log/maintenance details, not policy text; the two focus sentences are complete factual statements, not instructions; the counterfactual merely swaps 'operational' to 'awaiting repair' for Unit DC-7 without contradicting other stated facts (microscopes, video conferencing, facilities); no gold answer, rule table, or output instruction is embedded in either context; entity, room, time, and requirement bindings match the original question.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. It requires 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other requirements. The room inventory lists all 12 microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing capability. The teaching assistant's checklist confirms all microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing as operational. Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7. Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as operational. The facilities coordinator confirms desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7."}, {"path": [], "text": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as operational."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7.", "negative_left": "Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7.", "negative_right": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as awaiting repair.", "right": "Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as operational."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-081-019", "id": "fast-43-diverse-081-019-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. It requires 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing, with no other requirements. The room inventory lists all 12 microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing capability. The teaching assistant's checklist confirms all microscopes were placed and tested. The technology report marks video conferencing as operational. Room C12's equipment log for Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session lists a document camera identified as Unit DC-7. Unit DC-7's maintenance record, dated this morning, marks its status as awaiting repair. The facilities coordinator confirms desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the lesson-plan requirements and readiness policy from the original question without adding exceptions; the counterfactual coherently changes DC-77's status to awaiting repair, consistent with the rest of the unchanged context; evidence spans are two complete factual sentences, not policy text; no gold answer, rule table, or instructional leakage appears in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. The lesson plan requires exactly three items: 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing capability, with no other requirements listed. The room inventory confirms 12 powered microscopes are present, and the teaching assistant's checklist documents that every one of them was tested and is in working order. The technology report marks video conferencing as present in inventory and operational. Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session. The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as operational. Facilities has confirmed desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready for the session.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session."}, {"path": [], "text": "The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as operational."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session.", "negative_left": "Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session.", "negative_right": "The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as awaiting repair.", "right": "The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as operational."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-081-022", "id": "fast-43-diverse-081-022-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. The lesson plan requires exactly three items: 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing capability, with no other requirements listed. The room inventory confirms 12 powered microscopes are present, and the teaching assistant's checklist documents that every one of them was tested and is in working order. The technology report marks video conferencing as present in inventory and operational. Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session. The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as operational. Facilities has confirmed desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready for the session."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "education", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the lesson-plan requirements and readiness policy from the original question without adding exceptions; the counterfactual coherently changes DC-77's status to awaiting repair, consistent with the rest of the unchanged context; evidence spans are two complete factual sentences, not policy text; no gold answer, rule table, or instructional leakage appears in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported", "a9": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a10": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "refuted", "a9": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a8": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a8": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a8": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a8": "supported"}, "right": {"a8": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a single factual relationship; the universal and zero-count propositions remain atomic. The focus concerns the document camera’s documented status, not policy. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable with only that status changing. Empty policy evidence is correct because all governing readiness and routing rules occur in the automatically retained questions, while the original state contributes only case observations.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction identifies the complete requirement set and establishes inventory plus qualifying operational/test documentation for every required item. It therefore suffices for high readiness and proceeding without additional action.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "A required document camera together with explicit refutation of qualifying operational/test documentation establishes that at least one required item lacks required documentation. This suffices for the false outcome; the question’s retained policy supplies the applicable technology routing requirement.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires one document camera."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students requires video conferencing."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The number of lesson-plan requirements for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 other than 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing is zero."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains 12 powered microscopes."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Every powered microscope required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as tested."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The inventory for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 contains one document camera."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "The document camera required for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational or tested."}, {"id": "a9", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 appears in inventory."}, {"id": "a10", "statement": "Video conferencing for Mara’s 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 has documentation recording it as operational."}], "base_state_json": "\"Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. The lesson plan requires exactly three items: 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing capability, with no other requirements listed. The room inventory confirms 12 powered microscopes are present, and the teaching assistant's checklist documents that every one of them was tested and is in working order. The technology report marks video conferencing as present in inventory and operational. Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session. The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as operational. Facilities has confirmed desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready for the session.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a8", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session."}, {"path": [], "text": "The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as operational."}], "policy_evidence": [], "rules": [{"justification": "These conditions establish the complete lesson-plan requirement set and establish that every requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a9", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a10", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "The document camera is required, and explicit refutation of a qualifying documented status establishes that at least one required item lacks operational or tested documentation.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session.", "negative_left": "Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session.", "negative_right": "The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as awaiting repair.", "right": "The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as operational."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-081-022", "id": "fast-43-diverse-081-022-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — at least one required item lacks inventory or operational/setup documentation, so readiness is not high and the relevant task must be routed before proceeding.", "true": "Yes — every required item is inventoried and documented as operational or tested, so readiness is high and the session may proceed without additional action."}, "instructions": "Decide whether the session has high operational readiness and may proceed without additional action. Under the school rubric, readiness is high only when every lesson-plan requirement appears in inventory and has documented operational or tested status. Missing status or setup information makes the answer no. Equipment setup or diagnosis must be routed to the instructional technology technician; room, power, lighting, or furniture issues go to the facilities coordinator.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Instructor Mara's lesson plan schedules a 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session in Room C12 for 24 students. The lesson plan requires exactly three items: 12 powered microscopes, one document camera, and video conferencing capability, with no other requirements listed. The room inventory confirms 12 powered microscopes are present, and the teaching assistant's checklist documents that every one of them was tested and is in working order. The technology report marks video conferencing as present in inventory and operational. Room C12's equipment log lists one document camera, serial DC-77, assigned to Mara's 10:00 a.m. hybrid anatomy session. The technician's inspection sheet for serial DC-77 dated this morning marks its status as awaiting repair. Facilities has confirmed desks, power outlets, and lighting are ready for the session."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-081", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "974c3964d4c289bc4725bbdd7c41556c7a6f0f1c26acedb5c8b3649cb8b77fed", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "education-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the same entities, times, route and custody chain matching the question; the routing policy sentence is retained as narrative fact rather than a new rule; the two focus evidence sentences are plain factual statements about serial-patch values; the counterfactual coherently swaps only Mara's stated serial-patch value without contradicting other unchanged facts; no rubric labels, codes, or instructions are embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-7742-K.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-7742-K."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-9013-R.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-7742-K."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-012", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-012-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-7742-K.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the same entities, times, route and custody chain matching the question; the routing policy sentence is retained as narrative fact rather than a new rule; the two focus evidence sentences are plain factual statements about serial-patch values; the counterfactual coherently swaps only Mara's stated serial-patch value without contradicting other unchanged facts; no rubric labels, codes, or instructions are embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-7742-K.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-7742-K."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-9013-R.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-7742-K."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-012", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-012-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7742-K.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-9013-R.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the transit-vault routing policy and preserve entity, location, and time bindings; the counterfactual's mismatched serial-patch value creates a plausible material conflict without contradicting other unchanged facts, and no answer, rule table, or rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale without any gap in custody. The seal remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of the backpack. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket, a detail never disclosed publicly, and Mara Venn independently described this same hidden key when filing her claim. Every other material detail Mara supplied\\u2014item description, date, time, and location\\u2014matches the intake record exactly. The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is treated as a unique identifier for that specific backpack. Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K.\", \"Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7729-K when describing her backpack.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7729-K when describing her backpack."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-4412-Q when describing her backpack.", "right": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7729-K when describing her backpack."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-020", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-020-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale without any gap in custody. The seal remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of the backpack. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket, a detail never disclosed publicly, and Mara Venn independently described this same hidden key when filing her claim. Every other material detail Mara supplied—item description, date, time, and location—matches the intake record exactly. The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is treated as a unique identifier for that specific backpack. Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K.", "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7729-K when describing her backpack.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the transit-vault routing policy and preserve entity, location, and time bindings; the counterfactual's mismatched serial-patch value creates a plausible material conflict without contradicting other unchanged facts, and no answer, rule table, or rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale without any gap in custody. The seal remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of the backpack. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket, a detail never disclosed publicly, and Mara Venn independently described this same hidden key when filing her claim. Every other material detail Mara supplied\\u2014item description, date, time, and location\\u2014matches the intake record exactly. The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is treated as a unique identifier for that specific backpack. Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K.\", \"Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7729-K when describing her backpack.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"]}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7729-K when describing her backpack."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-4412-Q when describing her backpack.", "right": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7729-K when describing her backpack."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-020", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-020-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale without any gap in custody. The seal remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of the backpack. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket, a detail never disclosed publicly, and Mara Venn independently described this same hidden key when filing her claim. Every other material detail Mara supplied—item description, date, time, and location—matches the intake record exactly. The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is treated as a unique identifier for that specific backpack. Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-7729-K.", "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-4412-Q when describing her backpack.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."]}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the transit-vault policy verbatim and the same entities/path/time bindings; the two focus facts are plain factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes only the claimant-supplied serial value to create a mismatch without contradicting other unchanged facts; no gold answer, rubric, or rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale without any gap in custody.\",\"facts\":[\"The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604.\",\"The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist.\",\"The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it.\",\"The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack.\",\"The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742.\",\"Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7742 when she filed her claim.\",\"The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884, a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket, was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it.\",\"Mara Venn supplied a matching brass-key hidden-feature detail.\",\"All other material items, dates, times, locations, and identifiers Mara Venn supplied agree with the intake record.\"],\"policy\":\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["facts", "4"], "text": "The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742."}, {"path": ["facts", "5"], "text": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7742 when she filed her claim."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742.", "negative_left": "The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-9981 when she filed her claim.", "right": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7742 when she filed her claim."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-023", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-023-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale without any gap in custody.", "facts": ["The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604.", "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist.", "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it.", "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack.", "The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742.", "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7742 when she filed her claim.", "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884, a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket, was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it.", "Mara Venn supplied a matching brass-key hidden-feature detail.", "All other material items, dates, times, locations, and identifiers Mara Venn supplied agree with the intake record."], "policy": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the transit-vault policy verbatim and the same entities/path/time bindings; the two focus facts are plain factual sentences; the counterfactual coherently changes only the claimant-supplied serial value to create a mismatch without contradicting other unchanged facts; no gold answer, rubric, or rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale without any gap in custody.\",\"facts\":[\"The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604.\",\"The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist.\",\"The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it.\",\"The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack.\",\"The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742.\",\"Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7742 when she filed her claim.\",\"The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884, a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket, was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it.\",\"Mara Venn supplied a matching brass-key hidden-feature detail.\",\"All other material items, dates, times, locations, and identifiers Mara Venn supplied agree with the intake record.\"],\"policy\":\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["facts", "4"], "text": "The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742."}, {"path": ["facts", "5"], "text": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7742 when she filed her claim."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742.", "negative_left": "The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-9981 when she filed her claim.", "right": "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-7742 when she filed her claim."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-023", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-023-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale without any gap in custody.", "facts": ["The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604.", "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist.", "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it.", "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack.", "The serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884 in the intake log is SP-7742.", "Mara Venn supplied the serial-patch value SP-9981 when she filed her claim.", "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884, a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket, was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it.", "Mara Venn supplied a matching brass-key hidden-feature detail.", "All other material items, dates, times, locations, and identifiers Mara Venn supplied agree with the intake record."], "policy": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the rubric via the unchanged questions object, preserve entity T-884, claimant Mara Venn, and all time/location bindings, and each evidence item is a complete factual statement rather than a rule or answer; the counterfactual's altered serial-patch value creates a plausible, non-duplicative material conflict without leaking the intended label.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it with no gap in custody to lost-property custodian Arun Vale, who received it with the seal still unbroken. The intake record identifies the serial patch as a unique identifier for T-884. The intake record also lists a hidden-feature detail that was never publicly disclosed before being supplied by any claimant.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \\\"SP-7734-XR.\\\"\", \"Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \\\"SP-7734-XR.\\\"\", \"Claimant Mara Venn also separately described the hidden-feature detail, which matches the intake record's hidden-feature entry exactly. All other material items, dates, times, locations, and identifiers she supplied agree with the intake record.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \"SP-7734-XR.\""}, {"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \"SP-7734-XR.\""}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \"SP-7734-XR.\"", "negative_left": "Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \"SP-7734-XR.\"", "negative_right": "The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \"SP-9021-QT.\"", "right": "The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \"SP-7734-XR.\""}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-024", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-024-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it with no gap in custody to lost-property custodian Arun Vale, who received it with the seal still unbroken. The intake record identifies the serial patch as a unique identifier for T-884. The intake record also lists a hidden-feature detail that was never publicly disclosed before being supplied by any claimant.", "evidence": ["The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \"SP-7734-XR.\"", "Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \"SP-7734-XR.\"", "Claimant Mara Venn also separately described the hidden-feature detail, which matches the intake record's hidden-feature entry exactly. All other material items, dates, times, locations, and identifiers she supplied agree with the intake record.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the rubric via the unchanged questions object, preserve entity T-884, claimant Mara Venn, and all time/location bindings, and each evidence item is a complete factual statement rather than a rule or answer; the counterfactual's altered serial-patch value creates a plausible, non-duplicative material conflict without leaking the intended label.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it with no gap in custody to lost-property custodian Arun Vale, who received it with the seal still unbroken. The intake record identifies the serial patch as a unique identifier for T-884. The intake record also lists a hidden-feature detail that was never publicly disclosed before being supplied by any claimant.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \\\"SP-7734-XR.\\\"\", \"Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \\\"SP-7734-XR.\\\"\", \"Claimant Mara Venn also separately described the hidden-feature detail, which matches the intake record's hidden-feature entry exactly. All other material items, dates, times, locations, and identifiers she supplied agree with the intake record.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \"SP-7734-XR.\""}, {"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \"SP-7734-XR.\""}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \"SP-7734-XR.\"", "negative_left": "Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \"SP-7734-XR.\"", "negative_right": "The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \"SP-9021-QT.\"", "right": "The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \"SP-7734-XR.\""}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-024", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-024-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it with no gap in custody to lost-property custodian Arun Vale, who received it with the seal still unbroken. The intake record identifies the serial patch as a unique identifier for T-884. The intake record also lists a hidden-feature detail that was never publicly disclosed before being supplied by any claimant.", "evidence": ["The intake record for backpack T-884 lists its recorded serial-patch value as \"SP-9021-QT.\"", "Mara Venn stated that the serial patch on her backpack reads \"SP-7734-XR.\"", "Claimant Mara Venn also separately described the hidden-feature detail, which matches the intake record's hidden-feature entry exactly. All other material items, dates, times, locations, and identifiers she supplied agree with the intake record.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the routing policy, custody chain, and identical question rubric, changing only Mara's serial-patch value to create a plausible material conflict without contradicting other facts or leaking any answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it directly to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it with the seal still unbroken to lost-property custodian Arun Vale, leaving no gap in the custody chain.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K.\", \"The intake record also notes a brass key hidden inside a torn inner-lining pocket, a detail never publicly disclosed before the claim.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing the backpack on Route 18 around 18:00 and described the same hidden brass key in the torn lining.\", \"Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-7742-K when describing the backpack.\", \"All other details Mara gave, including the bus route, approximate time, and backpack color, match the intake record exactly; the serial-patch value is treated as the sole unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-7742-K when describing the backpack."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-8801-M when describing the backpack.", "right": "Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-7742-K when describing the backpack."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-053", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-053-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it directly to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it with the seal still unbroken to lost-property custodian Arun Vale, leaving no gap in the custody chain.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K.", "The intake record also notes a brass key hidden inside a torn inner-lining pocket, a detail never publicly disclosed before the claim.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing the backpack on Route 18 around 18:00 and described the same hidden brass key in the torn lining.", "Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-7742-K when describing the backpack.", "All other details Mara gave, including the bus route, approximate time, and backpack color, match the intake record exactly; the serial-patch value is treated as the sole unique identifier for the backpack.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the routing policy, custody chain, and identical question rubric, changing only Mara's serial-patch value to create a plausible material conflict without contradicting other facts or leaking any answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it directly to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it with the seal still unbroken to lost-property custodian Arun Vale, leaving no gap in the custody chain.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K.\", \"The intake record also notes a brass key hidden inside a torn inner-lining pocket, a detail never publicly disclosed before the claim.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing the backpack on Route 18 around 18:00 and described the same hidden brass key in the torn lining.\", \"Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-7742-K when describing the backpack.\", \"All other details Mara gave, including the bus route, approximate time, and backpack color, match the intake record exactly; the serial-patch value is treated as the sole unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K."}, {"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-7742-K when describing the backpack."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-8801-M when describing the backpack.", "right": "Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-7742-K when describing the backpack."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-053", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-053-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it directly to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred it with the seal still unbroken to lost-property custodian Arun Vale, leaving no gap in the custody chain.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists the serial-patch value for backpack T-884 as SP-7742-K.", "The intake record also notes a brass key hidden inside a torn inner-lining pocket, a detail never publicly disclosed before the claim.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing the backpack on Route 18 around 18:00 and described the same hidden brass key in the torn lining.", "Mara Venn supplied a serial-patch value of SP-8801-M when describing the backpack.", "All other details Mara gave, including the bus route, approximate time, and backpack color, match the intake record exactly; the serial-patch value is treated as the sole unique identifier for the backpack.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the transit-vault routing policy and intact custody chain matching the unchanged question rubric; entities, time, location and request remain bound to Mara Venn's Route 18 claim; the two focus evidence spans are plain factual statements about serial-patch values, not rules or instructions; the counterfactual coherently swaps only the serial-patch digit to create a material mismatch without duplicating or contradicting other fixed facts; and no context contains gold labels, rule tables, or output-directing text.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for the backpack.\",\"evidence\":[\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.\",\"Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q. She also correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed before she mentioned it.\",\"Mara also recalled that the bus was crowded and said the receptionist wore glasses; the custody record does not mention crowding or eyewear. All other material details Mara supplied—time, location, color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\",\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-064", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-064-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q. She also correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed before she mentioned it.", "Mara also recalled that the bus was crowded and said the receptionist wore glasses; the custody record does not mention crowding or eyewear. All other material details Mara supplied—time, location, color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the transit-vault routing policy and intact custody chain matching the unchanged question rubric; entities, time, location and request remain bound to Mara Venn's Route 18 claim; the two focus evidence spans are plain factual statements about serial-patch values, not rules or instructions; the counterfactual coherently swaps only the serial-patch digit to create a material mismatch without duplicating or contradicting other fixed facts; and no context contains gold labels, rule tables, or output-directing text.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for the backpack.\",\"evidence\":[\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.\",\"Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q. She also correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed before she mentioned it.\",\"Mara also recalled that the bus was crowded and said the receptionist wore glasses; the custody record does not mention crowding or eyewear. All other material details Mara supplied—time, location, color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\",\"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"],\"request\":\"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-064", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-064-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J. She also correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed before she mentioned it.", "Mara also recalled that the bus was crowded and said the receptionist wore glasses; the custody record does not mention crowding or eyewear. All other material details Mara supplied—time, location, color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the transit-vehicle routing policy and intact custody chain, preserve the original entity/route/time bindings, and the focus evidence pair consists of two complete factual sentences rather than policy text; the counterfactual only swaps Mara's stated serial-patch digits (SP-4419-Q to SP-6620-Z), which creates the intended identifier mismatch without contradicting the surviving 'all other details match' sentence or any other unchanged fact, and neither context states or hints at the rubric outcome.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4419-Q.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4419-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Z.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4419-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-065", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-065-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4419-Q.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the transit-vehicle routing policy and intact custody chain, preserve the original entity/route/time bindings, and the focus evidence pair consists of two complete factual sentences rather than policy text; the counterfactual only swaps Mara's stated serial-patch digits (SP-4419-Q to SP-6620-Z), which creates the intended identifier mismatch without contradicting the surviving 'all other details match' sentence or any other unchanged fact, and neither context states or hints at the rubric outcome.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4419-Q.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4419-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Z.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4419-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-065", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-065-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4419-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Z.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the Transit Depot Vault routing rule and unchanged claimant/route/date bindings; the counterfactual only swaps the claimant-stated serial value (SP-4471-Q to SP-6620-J), producing a plausible material mismatch without duplicate contradictory measurements; evidence lines are plain factual statements with no embedded rubric labels or answers.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody and the seal intact throughout. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature that was never publicly released, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, backpack color, and strap wear—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-066", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-066-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody and the seal intact throughout. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature that was never publicly released, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, backpack color, and strap wear—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the Transit Depot Vault routing rule and unchanged claimant/route/date bindings; the counterfactual only swaps the claimant-stated serial value (SP-4471-Q to SP-6620-J), producing a plausible material mismatch without duplicate contradictory measurements; evidence lines are plain factual statements with no embedded rubric labels or answers.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody and the seal intact throughout. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature that was never publicly released, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, backpack color, and strap wear—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-066", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-066-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody and the seal intact throughout. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature that was never publicly released, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, backpack color, and strap wear—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the transit-vehicle routing policy and rubric via the unchanged questions object, keep the same entities, route, and time bindings, and the two focus evidence spans are plain factual statements about the serial-patch values without embedding rules or answers; the counterfactual's altered serial-patch value only conflicts with the intake record's serial number while the separate 'other details' sentence explicitly excludes serial patch, so no contradictory duplicate assertion arises.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-5561-M.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-5561-M."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-2249-Q.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-5561-M."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-068", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-068-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-5561-M.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the transit-vehicle routing policy and rubric via the unchanged questions object, keep the same entities, route, and time bindings, and the two focus evidence spans are plain factual statements about the serial-patch values without embedding rules or answers; the counterfactual's altered serial-patch value only conflicts with the intake record's serial number while the separate 'other details' sentence explicitly excludes serial patch, so no contradictory duplicate assertion arises.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-5561-M.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-5561-M."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-2249-Q.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-5561-M."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-068", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-068-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-5561-M.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-2249-Q.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original transit-vehicle routing policy and custody-chain facts, and the unchanged questions object carries the full rubric so no policy is lost; entity/path/time bindings (T-884, Mara Venn, Route 18, 12 May 18:20/18:00) are unchanged. The focus evidence spans are complete factual statements ('The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.' and 'Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.'), not policy definitions or instructions. The counterfactual only substitutes Mara's claimed serial-patch value (SP-6650-Q) creating a plausible material mismatch scenario rather than a contradictory duplicate measurement, remaining coherent with the unchanged custody and route facts. Neither context contains a gold answer, rule table, or explicit output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6650-Q.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-070", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-070-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original transit-vehicle routing policy and custody-chain facts, and the unchanged questions object carries the full rubric so no policy is lost; entity/path/time bindings (T-884, Mara Venn, Route 18, 12 May 18:20/18:00) are unchanged. The focus evidence spans are complete factual statements ('The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.' and 'Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.'), not policy definitions or instructions. The counterfactual only substitutes Mara's claimed serial-patch value (SP-6650-Q) creating a plausible material mismatch scenario rather than a contradictory duplicate measurement, remaining coherent with the unchanged custody and route facts. Neither context contains a gold answer, rule table, or explicit output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6650-Q.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-070", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-070-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6650-Q.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain custody chain, transit-vault routing policy, and unchanged question rubric; only the serial-patch value differs, creating a coherent material conflict for the counterfactual without duplicate contradictory measurements or leaked answers, and the two focus evidence lines are plain factual statements rather than policy or instructions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a small silver whistle sewn into a false bottom panel as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for backpack T-884.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.\", \"Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing the backpack on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden whistle in the false bottom panel, a detail never publicly disclosed. All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, strap color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-8820-M.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-071", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-071-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a small silver whistle sewn into a false bottom panel as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for backpack T-884.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing the backpack on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden whistle in the false bottom panel, a detail never publicly disclosed. All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, strap color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain custody chain, transit-vault routing policy, and unchanged question rubric; only the serial-patch value differs, creating a coherent material conflict for the counterfactual without duplicate contradictory measurements or leaked answers, and the two focus evidence lines are plain factual statements rather than policy or instructions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a small silver whistle sewn into a false bottom panel as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for backpack T-884.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.\", \"Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing the backpack on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden whistle in the false bottom panel, a detail never publicly disclosed. All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, strap color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-8820-M.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-071", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-071-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a small silver whistle sewn into a false bottom panel as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for backpack T-884.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-8820-M.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing the backpack on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden whistle in the false bottom panel, a detail never publicly disclosed. All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, strap color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the same entities, route, custody chain and rubric-governing policy; the two focus sentences are plain factual statements about the serial-patch value; the counterfactual's mismatched serial patch (SP-6620-Q vs SP-4471-M) is a coherent single-fact change consistent with the rest of the unchanged evidence; no gold answer, rule table, or output instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature that was never publicly disclosed, and the serial patch is recorded as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.\", \"Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, matching the intake record exactly.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, canvas color, and strap wear—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Q.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-085", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-085-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature that was never publicly disclosed, and the serial patch is recorded as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, matching the intake record exactly.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, canvas color, and strap wear—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the same entities, route, custody chain and rubric-governing policy; the two focus sentences are plain factual statements about the serial-patch value; the counterfactual's mismatched serial patch (SP-6620-Q vs SP-4471-M) is a coherent single-fact change consistent with the rest of the unchanged evidence; no gold answer, rule table, or output instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature that was never publicly disclosed, and the serial patch is recorded as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.\", \"Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, matching the intake record exactly.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, canvas color, and strap wear—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Q.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-085", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-085-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature that was never publicly disclosed, and the serial patch is recorded as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, matching the intake record exactly.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, canvas color, and strap wear—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the same governing policy (transit-vehicle routing, unbroken custody, rubric untouched) and identical question bindings; the two focus evidence sentences are plain factual statements, the counterfactual coherently swaps only Mara's stated serial-patch value to create a material mismatch without duplicating or contradicting other facts, and no gold labels, rule tables or instructions are embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly, aside from an incidental remark about rainy weather and the receptionist's scarf color, which the custody record does not address.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-087", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-087-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly, aside from an incidental remark about rainy weather and the receptionist's scarf color, which the custody record does not address.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the same governing policy (transit-vehicle routing, unbroken custody, rubric untouched) and identical question bindings; the two focus evidence sentences are plain factual statements, the counterfactual coherently swaps only Mara's stated serial-patch value to create a material mismatch without duplicating or contradicting other facts, and no gold labels, rule tables or instructions are embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly, aside from an incidental remark about rainy weather and the receptionist's scarf color, which the custody record does not address.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-087", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-087-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, and the serial patch is treated as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-J.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, appearance, and container description—match the intake record exactly, aside from an incidental remark about rainy weather and the receptionist's scarf color, which the custody record does not address.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the transit-vehicle routing policy and unbroken custody chain from the original state, only altering the serial-patch value as a permissible case observation; the counterfactual's mismatched value 'SP-6688-J' versus the intake's 'SP-4021-Q' is a coherent factual conflict rather than a contradictory duplicate; evidence spans are complete factual statements with no embedded rubric labels or answer hints.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4021-Q.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, backpack color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4021-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6688-J.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4021-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-097", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-097-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4021-Q.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, backpack color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the transit-vehicle routing policy and unbroken custody chain from the original state, only altering the serial-patch value as a permissible case observation; the counterfactual's mismatched value 'SP-6688-J' versus the intake's 'SP-4021-Q' is a coherent factual conflict rather than a contradictory duplicate; evidence spans are complete factual statements with no embedded rubric labels or answer hints.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4021-Q.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, backpack color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4021-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6688-J.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4021-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-097", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-097-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4021-Q.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail, which was never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6688-J.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, backpack color, and container description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the same custody, routing and rubric bindings from the unchanged questions object, with only the claimant's stated serial-patch value altered in the counterfactual to create a material identifier conflict, which is internally consistent and free of gold-answer leakage or duplicate contradictory facts.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail inside the torn inner-lining pocket, a fact never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, canvas color, and strap description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Q.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-099", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-099-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail inside the torn inner-lining pocket, a fact never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, canvas color, and strap description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "release_high"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the same custody, routing and rubric bindings from the unchanged questions object, with only the claimant's stated serial-patch value altered in the counterfactual to create a material identifier conflict, which is internally consistent and free of gold-answer leakage or duplicate contradictory facts.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "refuted", "a6": "supported", "a7": "supported", "a8": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a5": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a5": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a5": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a5": "supported"}, "right": {"a5": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "The atoms each state a factual relationship; a8 is a permissible universally quantified agreement relation rather than a bundle or outcome classification. The focus a5 is factual. The base and counter assignments can differ only on a5: a8 expressly excludes the serial comparison governed by a5, so it can remain supported when a5 is refuted. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive transit-routing rule originating in the original state, while the unchanged questions automatically preserve the confidence rubric and its exceptions.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction is sufficient for release_high. a1 plus the preserved transit-routing policy establishes the Transit Depot Vault route; a2 and a3 establish intact custody; a4 and a5 establish a matching unique identifier; a6 and a7 establish a matching undisclosed feature; and a8 excludes other material conflicts.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "With a4 supported, the recorded serial patch is a unique identifier. Refuting a5 means Mara's supplied serial-patch value does not match that recorded identifier, which is a material identifier conflict and is independently sufficient for deny_low under the rubric.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "The backpack sealed as T-884 was found in the transit vehicle Route 18 bus 604."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "The custody chain for backpack T-884 has no gap between Imani Cole sealing it and Arun Vale receiving it from the civic hall receptionist."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "The seal on backpack T-884 remained unbroken through Arun Vale's receipt of it."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "The serial patch recorded for backpack T-884 is a unique identifier for that backpack."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The serial-patch value supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the serial-patch value recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail supplied by Mara Venn is identical to the hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "The hidden-feature detail recorded for backpack T-884 was not publicly disclosed before Mara Venn supplied it."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Every material item, date, time, location, or identifier detail supplied by Mara Venn, other than the serial-patch value compared in a5 and the hidden-feature detail compared in a6, agrees with the intake record for backpack T-884."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.\", \"evidence\": [\"The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.\", \"Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail inside the torn inner-lining pocket, a fact never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M.\", \"All other details Mara supplied—time, location, canvas color, and strap description—match the intake record exactly.\", \"Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in.\"], \"request\": \"Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}], "focus_atom": "a5", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "3"], "text": "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The transit-vehicle routing policy requires the Transit Depot Vault; custody has no gap and the seal remained unbroken; Mara's unique serial identifier and undisclosed feature both match; and every other material detail agrees with the intake record.", "target": "release_high", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Mara's supplied serial-patch value explicitly differs from the backpack's recorded unique identifier, creating a material identifier conflict that requires LOW confidence and no release.", "target": "deny_low", "when": [{"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_left": "The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "negative_right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Q.", "right": "Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-4471-M."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-169-099", "id": "fast-43-diverse-169-099-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"deny_low": "Do not release: LOW confidence because the route is incorrect or material facts conflict with the intake record.", "hold_medium": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault but hold the backpack: MEDIUM confidence because an identifying requirement is missing or custody is incomplete.", "release_high": "Send to the Transit Depot Vault and release to Mara: HIGH confidence because custody is intact and both required identifying elements match without material conflict."}, "instructions": "Apply this rubric: HIGH—route is correct, custody is intact, and the claimant supplies both a unique identifier and one undisclosed feature without a material conflict; release is permitted. MEDIUM—route is correct and the claim is plausible, but either required identifying element is missing or custody has a gap; hold for more evidence. LOW—route is wrong or a material item, date, location, or identifier conflicts; do not release. Weather, staff clothing, and similar incidental observations are distractors, not material conflicts.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A navy canvas backpack was found on Route 18 bus 604 at 18:20 on 12 May. Transit operator Imani Cole sealed it as T-884 and delivered it to the civic hall receptionist, who transferred the unbroken seal to lost-property custodian Arun Vale with no gap in custody. The intake record lists a brass key inside a torn inner-lining pocket as an undisclosed hidden feature, along with the serial patch as a unique identifier for the backpack.", "evidence": ["The intake record lists backpack T-884's serial-patch value as SP-4471-M.", "Claimant Mara Venn reported losing it on Route 18 around 18:00 and correctly described the hidden brass key detail inside the torn inner-lining pocket, a fact never publicly disclosed. Mara Venn stated that the serial-patch value on her backpack reads SP-6620-Q.", "All other details Mara supplied—time, location, canvas color, and strap description—match the intake record exactly.", "Policy routes property found in transit vehicles to the Transit Depot Vault, regardless of where it was handed in."], "request": "Choose the proper route and determine whether Mara's evidence permits release under the confidence rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-169", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "f66ed37c9ac78e8f95726fee9c7682cb364129e23967503b388668e0d32caf33", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "deny_low"}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the full matching/release policy verbatim and retain the same item, claimant, date, and location bindings; the two evidence spans are factual serial-record statements, not policy text; the counterfactual coherently swaps only Ivo's receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier without contradicting other facts; neither context states or hints at the final decision.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case Note – Lost Property File #LP-2291\\n\\nItem: Black Solis A5 mobile phone.\\nFound by: Transit operator Mara, bus route 42, 14 September.\\nHandling: A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds.\\n\\nClaimant: Ivo. He states he lost a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September — the item type, date, and location he describes match the item type, date, and location Mara recorded when she found the phone.\\n\\nSerial records: Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-77291-Q.\\n\\nGoverning policy: Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\\n\\nThe custodian is now reviewing the file to decide whether to release the phone to Ivo.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-77291-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q.", "negative_left": "Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-84410-X.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-77291-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-001", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case Note – Lost Property File #LP-2291\n\nItem: Black Solis A5 mobile phone.\nFound by: Transit operator Mara, bus route 42, 14 September.\nHandling: A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds.\n\nClaimant: Ivo. He states he lost a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September — the item type, date, and location he describes match the item type, date, and location Mara recorded when she found the phone.\n\nSerial records: Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-77291-Q.\n\nGoverning policy: Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\n\nThe custodian is now reviewing the file to decide whether to release the phone to Ivo."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the full matching/release policy verbatim and retain the same item, claimant, date, and location bindings; the two evidence spans are factual serial-record statements, not policy text; the counterfactual coherently swaps only Ivo's receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier without contradicting other facts; neither context states or hints at the final decision.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case Note – Lost Property File #LP-2291\\n\\nItem: Black Solis A5 mobile phone.\\nFound by: Transit operator Mara, bus route 42, 14 September.\\nHandling: A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds.\\n\\nClaimant: Ivo. He states he lost a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September — the item type, date, and location he describes match the item type, date, and location Mara recorded when she found the phone.\\n\\nSerial records: Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-77291-Q.\\n\\nGoverning policy: Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\\n\\nThe custodian is now reviewing the file to decide whether to release the phone to Ivo.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-77291-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q.", "negative_left": "Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-84410-X.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-77291-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-001", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case Note – Lost Property File #LP-2291\n\nItem: Black Solis A5 mobile phone.\nFound by: Transit operator Mara, bus route 42, 14 September.\nHandling: A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds.\n\nClaimant: Ivo. He states he lost a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September — the item type, date, and location he describes match the item type, date, and location Mara recorded when she found the phone.\n\nSerial records: Mara recorded the phone found on bus 42 as having serial identifier ENG-77291-Q. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier for his lost phone as ENG-84410-X.\n\nGoverning policy: Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\n\nThe custodian is now reviewing the file to decide whether to release the phone to Ivo."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching/release policy verbatim, preserve the Solis A5/bus 42/14 September/Ivo/Mara bindings, supply two factual non-policy evidence sentences about the serial identifiers, differ coherently only in Ivo's receipt serial (exact match vs conflicting), and contain no gold labels, rule tables, or output instructions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. She sealed it in a bag and handed it to a civic facility receptionist, who transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September. Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-7734-2201. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-7734-2201."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201.", "negative_left": "Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-8890-5567.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-7734-2201."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-002", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-002-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. She sealed it in a bag and handed it to a civic facility receptionist, who transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September. Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-7734-2201. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching/release policy verbatim, preserve the Solis A5/bus 42/14 September/Ivo/Mara bindings, supply two factual non-policy evidence sentences about the serial identifiers, differ coherently only in Ivo's receipt serial (exact match vs conflicting), and contain no gold labels, rule tables, or output instructions.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. She sealed it in a bag and handed it to a civic facility receptionist, who transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September. Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-7734-2201. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-7734-2201."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201.", "negative_left": "Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-8890-5567.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-7734-2201."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-002", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-002-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. She sealed it in a bag and handed it to a civic facility receptionist, who transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September. Mara logged the phone she found on bus 42 with serial identifier IMEI-7734-2201. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as IMEI-8890-5567. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching-scale and release policy verbatim alongside the unchanged question, preserve the item/date/location/bus bindings, cite two factual (non-policy) evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently swaps only the receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier without duplicating or contradicting other measurements or leaking any answer/label.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: Lost Property Match Review. Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September. His claim's item type, date, and location match Mara's find report exactly. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-77531-Q. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-77531-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-84420-T.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-77531-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-003", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-003-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case note: Lost Property Match Review. Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September. His claim's item type, date, and location match Mara's find report exactly. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-77531-Q. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching-scale and release policy verbatim alongside the unchanged question, preserve the item/date/location/bus bindings, cite two factual (non-policy) evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently swaps only the receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier without duplicating or contradicting other measurements or leaking any answer/label.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: Lost Property Match Review. Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September. His claim's item type, date, and location match Mara's find report exactly. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-77531-Q. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-77531-Q."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-84420-T.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-77531-Q."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-003", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-003-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Case note: Lost Property Match Review. Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September. His claim's item type, date, and location match Mara's find report exactly. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier ENV-77531-Q recorded in the found-property log. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as ENV-84420-T. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching-scale and release policy, keep item/date/location/claimant bindings unchanged, and use two factual sentences (log serial and receipt serial) as evidence without embedding rule tables or answers; the counterfactual coherently swaps only the receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier, consistent with the rest of the unchanged context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Lost Property Case #221: Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-77841-QZ for his phone.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-77841-QZ for his phone."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-90213-KX for his phone.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-77841-QZ for his phone."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-004", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Lost Property Case #221: Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-77841-QZ for his phone."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching-scale and release policy, keep item/date/location/claimant bindings unchanged, and use two factual sentences (log serial and receipt serial) as evidence without embedding rule tables or answers; the counterfactual coherently swaps only the receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier, consistent with the rest of the unchanged context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Lost Property Case #221: Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-77841-QZ for his phone.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-77841-QZ for his phone."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-90213-KX for his phone.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-77841-QZ for his phone."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-004", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Lost Property Case #221: Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has serial identifier SN-77841-QZ recorded in the lost-property log. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier SN-90213-KX for his phone."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original policy scale and release requirement verbatim alongside the unchanged question; the counterfactual changes only the receipt's serial number to create a conflicting identifier, remaining internally coherent; the two focus evidence spans are complete factual sentences about recorded serials, not policy text; no gold answer, rule table, or label rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and recorded it in the case file. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag, then transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. Ivo has also provided a purchase receipt listing a serial number for verification. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-77284-XT.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-77284-XT."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-90931-QZ.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-77284-XT."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-006", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-006-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and recorded it in the case file. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag, then transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. Ivo has also provided a purchase receipt listing a serial number for verification. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-77284-XT."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the original policy scale and release requirement verbatim alongside the unchanged question; the counterfactual changes only the receipt's serial number to create a conflicting identifier, remaining internally coherent; the two focus evidence spans are complete factual sentences about recorded serials, not policy text; no gold answer, rule table, or label rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and recorded it in the case file. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag, then transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. Ivo has also provided a purchase receipt listing a serial number for verification. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-77284-XT.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-77284-XT."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-90931-QZ.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-77284-XT."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-006", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-006-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and recorded it in the case file. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag, then transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. Ivo has also provided a purchase receipt listing a serial number for verification. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of SN-77284-XT. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-90931-QZ."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching-scale and release policy verbatim, preserve the original question's entity/path/time bindings, use two complete factual sentences as evidence, and the counterfactual coherently alters only the found phone's serial to create a conflicting identifier without contradicting other facts or leaking the answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location claimed by Ivo, who says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 that same day. The bag was sealed by a civic facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, per standard procedure for bus finds. Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7734X21 in the bus depot's lost-property register. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The custodian is now reviewing whether the match is sufficient to release the phone to Ivo.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7734X21 in the bus depot's lost-property register."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7734X21 in the bus depot's lost-property register.", "negative_left": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-8891Q45 in the bus depot's lost-property register.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-008", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-008-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location claimed by Ivo, who says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 that same day. The bag was sealed by a civic facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, per standard procedure for bus finds. Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7734X21 in the bus depot's lost-property register. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The custodian is now reviewing whether the match is sufficient to release the phone to Ivo."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching-scale and release policy verbatim, preserve the original question's entity/path/time bindings, use two complete factual sentences as evidence, and the counterfactual coherently alters only the found phone's serial to create a conflicting identifier without contradicting other facts or leaking the answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location claimed by Ivo, who says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 that same day. The bag was sealed by a civic facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, per standard procedure for bus finds. Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7734X21 in the bus depot's lost-property register. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The custodian is now reviewing whether the match is sufficient to release the phone to Ivo.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7734X21 in the bus depot's lost-property register."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7734X21 in the bus depot's lost-property register.", "negative_left": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-8891Q45 in the bus depot's lost-property register.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-008", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-008-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location claimed by Ivo, who says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 that same day. The bag was sealed by a civic facility receptionist and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, per standard procedure for bus finds. Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-8891Q45 in the bus depot's lost-property register. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734X21. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence. The custodian is now reviewing whether the match is sufficient to release the phone to Ivo."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the full matching scale and release policy verbatim, preserve the same entities/date/location bindings, use two factual (non-instructional) evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently swaps only the receipt serial without contradicting other facts or leaking the answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item was bagged and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location recorded for the found phone. The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-KX. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-KX."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-9021-QP.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-KX."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-010", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-010-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item was bagged and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location recorded for the found phone. The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-KX. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep the full matching scale and release policy verbatim, preserve the same entities/date/location bindings, use two factual (non-instructional) evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently swaps only the receipt serial without contradicting other facts or leaking the answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item was bagged and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location recorded for the found phone. The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-KX. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-KX."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-9021-QP.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-KX."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-010", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-010-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item was bagged and transferred unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot. Claimant Ivo says he lost a black Solis A5 on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location recorded for the found phone. The phone found by Mara has a recorded serial identifier of SN-7734-KX. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-9021-QP. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the matching scale and release policy verbatim, and the question is unchanged; base context shows matching identifiers (High match) while counterfactual changes only the receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier (Medium match), which is coherent since all other facts remain consistent; the two focus evidence spans are complete factual sentences stating the found and claimed serial numbers; no gold answer, rule table, or instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and logged it with the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. A receptionist at a civic facility had accepted the sealed bag and forwarded it unopened to the custodian. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-BK9. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-BK9."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-4412-XZ1.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-BK9."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-012", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-012-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and logged it with the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. A receptionist at a civic facility had accepted the sealed bag and forwarded it unopened to the custodian. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-BK9. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the matching scale and release policy verbatim, and the question is unchanged; base context shows matching identifiers (High match) while counterfactual changes only the receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier (Medium match), which is coherent since all other facts remain consistent; the two focus evidence spans are complete factual sentences stating the found and claimed serial numbers; no gold answer, rule table, or instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and logged it with the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. A receptionist at a civic facility had accepted the sealed bag and forwarded it unopened to the custodian. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-BK9. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-BK9."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-4412-XZ1.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-7734-BK9."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-012", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-012-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and logged it with the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. A receptionist at a civic facility had accepted the sealed bag and forwarded it unopened to the custodian. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-BK9. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as SN-4412-XZ1. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching-scale and release policy from the original state, unchanged by the question object; item type, date, and location bindings for bus 42/14 September/Solis A5 remain identical across base and counterfactual; the two evidence spans are complete factual sentences about serial identifiers rather than policy text; the counterfactual coherently changes only Ivo's receipt serial to create a conflicting-identifier scenario without contradicting other facts; and neither context contains a gold label, rule table, or instructional leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and sealed it for storage. A civic facility receptionist accepted the bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ. Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-7734-XQ. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-7734-XQ."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-8891-RT.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-7734-XQ."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-013", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-013-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and sealed it for storage. A civic facility receptionist accepted the bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ. Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-7734-XQ. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching-scale and release policy from the original state, unchanged by the question object; item type, date, and location bindings for bus 42/14 September/Solis A5 remain identical across base and counterfactual; the two evidence spans are complete factual sentences about serial identifiers rather than policy text; the counterfactual coherently changes only Ivo's receipt serial to create a conflicting-identifier scenario without contradicting other facts; and neither context contains a gold label, rule table, or instructional leakage.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and sealed it for storage. A civic facility receptionist accepted the bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ. Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-7734-XQ. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-7734-XQ."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-8891-RT.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-7734-XQ."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-013", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-013-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September and sealed it for storage. A civic facility receptionist accepted the bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type, date, and location of the found phone. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a serial identifier recorded as SN-7734-XQ. Ivo's purchase receipt for the lost phone lists the serial identifier as SN-8891-RT. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the matching-scale and release-requires-High policy verbatim from the original state alongside the unchanged question, and the dropped 'required storage location' detail is immaterial to the matching/release decision; the two focus sentences are plain factual identifier statements, not policy or instructions; the counterfactual coherently swaps the receipt's IMEI to a conflicting number without contradicting any other stated measurement; entity, location, date, and item-type bindings match the original question exactly; no gold label, rule table, or output instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type Ivo described for his lost phone. Mara logged the find at the same location, bus 42, and the same date, 14 September, as Ivo's claimed loss. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot. Claimant Ivo submitted a purchase receipt for his black Solis A5 phone. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678901. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678901."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678922.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678901."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-015", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-015-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type Ivo described for his lost phone. Mara logged the find at the same location, bus 42, and the same date, 14 September, as Ivo's claimed loss. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot. Claimant Ivo submitted a purchase receipt for his black Solis A5 phone. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678901. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts preserve the matching-scale and release-requires-High policy verbatim from the original state alongside the unchanged question, and the dropped 'required storage location' detail is immaterial to the matching/release decision; the two focus sentences are plain factual identifier statements, not policy or instructions; the counterfactual coherently swaps the receipt's IMEI to a conflicting number without contradicting any other stated measurement; entity, location, date, and item-type bindings match the original question exactly; no gold label, rule table, or output instruction is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type Ivo described for his lost phone. Mara logged the find at the same location, bus 42, and the same date, 14 September, as Ivo's claimed loss. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot. Claimant Ivo submitted a purchase receipt for his black Solis A5 phone. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678901. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678901."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901.", "negative_left": "The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678922.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678901."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-015", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-015-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September, matching the item type Ivo described for his lost phone. Mara logged the find at the same location, bus 42, and the same date, 14 September, as Ivo's claimed loss. The phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September has a recorded serial identifier of IMEI 359012345678901. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot. Claimant Ivo submitted a purchase receipt for his black Solis A5 phone. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the serial identifier of his lost phone as IMEI 359012345678922. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching/release policy verbatim, use the same entities/item/date/location as the original question, provide two factual (non-policy) evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently swaps only the receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier without duplicating or contradicting other facts or leaking the answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item type, date, and location Mara recorded match the item type, date, and location Ivo described. Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ.", "negative_left": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-8891-ZT.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-016", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-016-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item type, date, and location Mara recorded match the item type, date, and location Ivo described. Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": true}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the full matching/release policy verbatim, use the same entities/item/date/location as the original question, provide two factual (non-policy) evidence sentences, and the counterfactual coherently swaps only the receipt serial to create a conflicting identifier without duplicating or contradicting other facts or leaking the answer.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"A1": "supported", "A2": "supported", "A3": "supported", "A4": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"A4": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"A4": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"A4": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"A4": "supported"}, "right": {"A4": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states one factual matching relationship. The focus atom is the factual serial-identifier match. The policy evidence correctly preserves the matching scale and release threshold originating in the original state. The base and counter assignments are jointly realizable as otherwise identical scenarios differing only in whether the serial identifiers match. Both rules are sufficient for their targets under the explicit policy.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies all stated requirements for High confidence, which requires release.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "Matching descriptive facts combined with a refuted exact-identifier match establishes the stated Medium category rather than High; because release requires High confidence, non-release follows.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "A1", "statement": "The item type of the phone found by Mara on bus 42 on 14 September matches the item type claimed by Ivo for the phone he lost."}, {"id": "A2", "statement": "The date on which Mara found the phone matches the date on which Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A3", "statement": "The location where Mara found the phone matches the location where Ivo claims he lost his phone."}, {"id": "A4", "statement": "The exact serial identifier recorded for the phone found by Mara matches the exact serial identifier listed on Ivo's purchase receipt."}], "base_state_json": "\"Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item type, date, and location Mara recorded match the item type, date, and location Ivo described. Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "A4", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ."}, {"path": [], "text": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}], "rules": [{"justification": "Matching item type, date, location, and exact identifier satisfies every stated requirement for a High-confidence match; the policy requires release at High confidence.", "target": "true", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "supported"}]}, {"justification": "Matching descriptive facts with a conflicting exact identifier is Medium rather than High under the stated scale, and release requires High confidence.", "target": "false", "when": [{"atom_id": "A1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "A4", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ.", "negative_left": "Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ.", "negative_right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-8891-ZT.", "right": "Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-171-016", "id": "fast-43-diverse-171-016-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"false": "No — the evidence does not produce a High-confidence match, so the item should not be released.", "true": "Yes — the evidence produces a High-confidence match, so the item should be released."}, "instructions": "Should the lost-property custodian release the phone to Ivo? Apply the stated matching scale and release policy using only the explicit evidence.", "type": "noul"}}, "state": "Transit operator Mara found a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. A civic facility receptionist accepted the sealed bag and transferred it unopened to the lost-property custodian at the transit depot, the required storage location for bus finds. Claimant Ivo reports losing a black Solis A5 phone on bus 42 on 14 September. The item type, date, and location Mara recorded match the item type, date, and location Ivo described. Mara logged the found phone's serial identifier as SN-7743-XQ. Ivo's purchase receipt lists the phone's serial identifier as SN-8891-ZT. Policy rates matches: High requires matching item type, date/location, and exact identifier; Medium has matching descriptive facts but a conflicting identifier; Low has only one matching fact; No Match has none. Release requires High confidence."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-171", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "686683461f96a88d16f705bfba3152ade3eba1050514978108530a847ebb1498", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": false}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy (latest verified update governs) and add a consistent lining-code detail comparison without altering question bindings or leaking rubric outcomes; the counterfactual coherently changes only the reported code value to create a mismatch, and the two evidence spans are complete factual sentences, not policy text.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \\\"LM.\\\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist initially added \\\"possible red band\\\" from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials; its orange inventory band was applied after recovery, and the inspection also recorded the item's lining code. This May 13 update is the verified, most recent custody entry available for the claim. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison, which relates the lining code Lena Mora reported to the lining code recorded in the May 13 update. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature. Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-4471. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-4471."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-9902.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-4471."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-001", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-001-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \"LM.\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist initially added \"possible red band\" from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials; its orange inventory band was applied after recovery, and the inspection also recorded the item's lining code. This May 13 update is the verified, most recent custody entry available for the claim. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison, which relates the lining code Lena Mora reported to the lining code recorded in the May 13 update. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature. Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-4471. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy (latest verified update governs) and add a consistent lining-code detail comparison without altering question bindings or leaking rubric outcomes; the counterfactual coherently changes only the reported code value to create a mismatch, and the two evidence spans are complete factual sentences, not policy text.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \\\"LM.\\\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist initially added \\\"possible red band\\\" from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials; its orange inventory band was applied after recovery, and the inspection also recorded the item's lining code. This May 13 update is the verified, most recent custody entry available for the claim. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison, which relates the lining code Lena Mora reported to the lining code recorded in the May 13 update. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature. Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-4471. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-4471."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-9902.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-4471."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-001", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-001-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \"LM.\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist initially added \"possible red band\" from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials; its orange inventory band was applied after recovery, and the inspection also recorded the item's lining code. This May 13 update is the verified, most recent custody entry available for the claim. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison, which relates the lining code Lena Mora reported to the lining code recorded in the May 13 update. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature. Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as LC-4471. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as LC-9902. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing 'latest verified update' policy and the original claimant, bus, date, and item bindings; the two evidence sentences are plain factual statements, not policy or rubric language; the counterfactual coherently alters only the stored lining code to create a mismatch without contradicting other unchanged facts; and neither context contains a rubric score, answer code, or explicit output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked 'LM'. The transit operator's log matched a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist had earlier added a note of 'possible red band' from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record, which is the latest verified custody entry: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, with an orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 update is treated as authoritative over all earlier entries. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general umbrella type), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the item's lining code, which was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, making it a distinctive nonpublic feature. Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'BLK-7Q2R'.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'BLK-7Q2R'."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'GRY-4M9X'.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'BLK-7Q2R'."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-005", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-005-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked 'LM'. The transit operator's log matched a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist had earlier added a note of 'possible red band' from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record, which is the latest verified custody entry: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, with an orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 update is treated as authoritative over all earlier entries. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general umbrella type), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the item's lining code, which was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, making it a distinctive nonpublic feature. Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'BLK-7Q2R'."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the governing 'latest verified update' policy and the original claimant, bus, date, and item bindings; the two evidence sentences are plain factual statements, not policy or rubric language; the counterfactual coherently alters only the stored lining code to create a mismatch without contradicting other unchanged facts; and neither context contains a rubric score, answer code, or explicit output instruction.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked 'LM'. The transit operator's log matched a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist had earlier added a note of 'possible red band' from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record, which is the latest verified custody entry: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, with an orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 update is treated as authoritative over all earlier entries. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general umbrella type), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the item's lining code, which was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, making it a distinctive nonpublic feature. Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'BLK-7Q2R'.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'BLK-7Q2R'."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'GRY-4M9X'.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'BLK-7Q2R'."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-005", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-005-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked 'LM'. The transit operator's log matched a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist had earlier added a note of 'possible red band' from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record, which is the latest verified custody entry: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, with an orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 update is treated as authoritative over all earlier entries. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general umbrella type), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the item's lining code, which was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, making it a distinctive nonpublic feature. Lena Mora reported the lining code of the item she claims as 'BLK-7Q2R'. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as 'GRY-4M9X'."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same claimant, bus, dates and rely on the unchanged question's policy language, only altering the lining-code observation, which is a permissible factual change; the two evidence sentences are plain factual statements with no embedded rules or labels.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, Lena Mora reported leaving an umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, citing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked 'LM.' The transit operator's original log noted only a dark umbrella found on that bus and date, later supplemented by a receptionist's unverified note of a 'possible red band.' On May 13, the lost-property custodian conducted a physical inspection and issued an updated custody record, which is confirmed as the verified and most recent entry available for the stored item. Comparing Lena Mora's claim against this May 13 record yields four total claimant-to-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general umbrella description), all of which agree. The fourth comparison concerns an identifying detail: the lining code. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204. This lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora prior to her report, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-317.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-006", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-006-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, Lena Mora reported leaving an umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, citing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked 'LM.' The transit operator's original log noted only a dark umbrella found on that bus and date, later supplemented by a receptionist's unverified note of a 'possible red band.' On May 13, the lost-property custodian conducted a physical inspection and issued an updated custody record, which is confirmed as the verified and most recent entry available for the stored item. Comparing Lena Mora's claim against this May 13 record yields four total claimant-to-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general umbrella description), all of which agree. The fourth comparison concerns an identifying detail: the lining code. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204. This lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora prior to her report, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same claimant, bus, dates and rely on the unchanged question's policy language, only altering the lining-code observation, which is a permissible factual change; the two evidence sentences are plain factual statements with no embedded rules or labels.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, Lena Mora reported leaving an umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, citing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked 'LM.' The transit operator's original log noted only a dark umbrella found on that bus and date, later supplemented by a receptionist's unverified note of a 'possible red band.' On May 13, the lost-property custodian conducted a physical inspection and issued an updated custody record, which is confirmed as the verified and most recent entry available for the stored item. Comparing Lena Mora's claim against this May 13 record yields four total claimant-to-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general umbrella description), all of which agree. The fourth comparison concerns an identifying detail: the lining code. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204. This lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora prior to her report, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-317.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-006", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-006-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, Lena Mora reported leaving an umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, citing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked 'LM.' The transit operator's original log noted only a dark umbrella found on that bus and date, later supplemented by a receptionist's unverified note of a 'possible red band.' On May 13, the lost-property custodian conducted a physical inspection and issued an updated custody record, which is confirmed as the verified and most recent entry available for the stored item. Comparing Lena Mora's claim against this May 13 record yields four total claimant-to-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general umbrella description), all of which agree. The fourth comparison concerns an identifying detail: the lining code. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-204. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LX-317. This lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora prior to her report, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same policy, entities, dates and comparison structure; only the single lining-code sentence differs, creating a coherent conflict without duplicate contradictory measurements; evidence spans are complete factual sentences with no labels, codes or instructions embedded.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \\\"LM.\\\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date, and a receptionist later added an unverified note about a possible red band from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and verified the record: a navy folding umbrella with a straight plastic handle, no initials, and an orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 inspection is the latest verified custody entry available for deciding Lena Mora's claim. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (route, date, and general description), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the item's lining code. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249. The lining code was never disclosed to her beforehand, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-3381.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-007", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-007-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \"LM.\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date, and a receptionist later added an unverified note about a possible red band from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and verified the record: a navy folding umbrella with a straight plastic handle, no initials, and an orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 inspection is the latest verified custody entry available for deciding Lena Mora's claim. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (route, date, and general description), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the item's lining code. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249. The lining code was never disclosed to her beforehand, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same policy, entities, dates and comparison structure; only the single lining-code sentence differs, creating a coherent conflict without duplicate contradictory measurements; evidence spans are complete factual sentences with no labels, codes or instructions embedded.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \\\"LM.\\\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date, and a receptionist later added an unverified note about a possible red band from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and verified the record: a navy folding umbrella with a straight plastic handle, no initials, and an orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 inspection is the latest verified custody entry available for deciding Lena Mora's claim. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (route, date, and general description), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the item's lining code. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249. The lining code was never disclosed to her beforehand, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-3381.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-007", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-007-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \"LM.\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date, and a receptionist later added an unverified note about a possible red band from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and verified the record: a navy folding umbrella with a straight plastic handle, no initials, and an orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 inspection is the latest verified custody entry available for deciding Lena Mora's claim. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (route, date, and general description), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the item's lining code. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-2249. The lining code was never disclosed to her beforehand, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-3381. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the 'latest verified update governs' policy and the unchanged question rubric, only the counterfactual's single lining-code sentence differs (LX-2247 vs LX-3390), which is a coherent single-fact change without contradicting other stated comparisons, and neither context reveals a score, rule table, or rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: Lena Mora filed a claim on May 12 for an umbrella lost on bus 41 on May 10. The transit operator's original log and a receptionist's phone note supplied preliminary circumstance details, all of which align with Mora's account. On May 13, the lost-property custodian conducted a verified physical inspection of the stored item, producing an update that supersedes all earlier entries per policy. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains four claimant-to-item comparisons total: three concern circumstances (date, location, and item type), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the lining code. This lining code was never disclosed to Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-2247.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-2247."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-3390.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-2247."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-008", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-008-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Case note: Lena Mora filed a claim on May 12 for an umbrella lost on bus 41 on May 10. The transit operator's original log and a receptionist's phone note supplied preliminary circumstance details, all of which align with Mora's account. On May 13, the lost-property custodian conducted a verified physical inspection of the stored item, producing an update that supersedes all earlier entries per policy. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains four claimant-to-item comparisons total: three concern circumstances (date, location, and item type), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the lining code. This lining code was never disclosed to Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-2247."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the 'latest verified update governs' policy and the unchanged question rubric, only the counterfactual's single lining-code sentence differs (LX-2247 vs LX-3390), which is a coherent single-fact change without contradicting other stated comparisons, and neither context reveals a score, rule table, or rationale.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case note: Lena Mora filed a claim on May 12 for an umbrella lost on bus 41 on May 10. The transit operator's original log and a receptionist's phone note supplied preliminary circumstance details, all of which align with Mora's account. On May 13, the lost-property custodian conducted a verified physical inspection of the stored item, producing an update that supersedes all earlier entries per policy. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains four claimant-to-item comparisons total: three concern circumstances (date, location, and item type), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the lining code. This lining code was never disclosed to Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-2247.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-2247."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-3390.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-2247."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-008", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-008-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Case note: Lena Mora filed a claim on May 12 for an umbrella lost on bus 41 on May 10. The transit operator's original log and a receptionist's phone note supplied preliminary circumstance details, all of which align with Mora's account. On May 13, the lost-property custodian conducted a verified physical inspection of the stored item, producing an update that supersedes all earlier entries per policy. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains four claimant-to-item comparisons total: three concern circumstances (date, location, and item type), all of which agree, and one concerns an identifying detail — the lining code. This lining code was never disclosed to Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Lena Mora reported the lining code for the stored item as pattern code LX-2247. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern code LX-3390."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original circumstantial details, the 'latest verified update' policy, and the same claimant/item/time bindings, while adding a lining-code comparison consistent with the question's identifying-detail criteria; the counterfactual coherently alters only the stored item's lining code value (LN-4471→LN-5820) without duplicating or contradicting other facts, and neither context states or hints at the intended score.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case Note – Lost Property Claim (Lena Mora)\\n\\nOn May 12, Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \\u201cLM.\\u201d The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A receptionist later added a note about a possible red band from a phone inquiry.\\n\\nOn May 13, the lost-property custodian personally inspected the stored item and issued a verified update, superseding all earlier entries: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 entry is the latest verified custody record available for the decision.\\n\\nThe complete decision record contains four claimant-to-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general appearance), all of which agree. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison, concerning the lining code, which was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it and is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471.\\n\\nPolicy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-5820.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-009", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-009-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Case Note – Lost Property Claim (Lena Mora)\n\nOn May 12, Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked “LM.” The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A receptionist later added a note about a possible red band from a phone inquiry.\n\nOn May 13, the lost-property custodian personally inspected the stored item and issued a verified update, superseding all earlier entries: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 entry is the latest verified custody record available for the decision.\n\nThe complete decision record contains four claimant-to-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general appearance), all of which agree. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison, concerning the lining code, which was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it and is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471.\n\nPolicy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original circumstantial details, the 'latest verified update' policy, and the same claimant/item/time bindings, while adding a lining-code comparison consistent with the question's identifying-detail criteria; the counterfactual coherently alters only the stored item's lining code value (LN-4471→LN-5820) without duplicating or contradicting other facts, and neither context states or hints at the intended score.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Case Note – Lost Property Claim (Lena Mora)\\n\\nOn May 12, Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \\u201cLM.\\u201d The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A receptionist later added a note about a possible red band from a phone inquiry.\\n\\nOn May 13, the lost-property custodian personally inspected the stored item and issued a verified update, superseding all earlier entries: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 entry is the latest verified custody record available for the decision.\\n\\nThe complete decision record contains four claimant-to-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general appearance), all of which agree. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison, concerning the lining code, which was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it and is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471.\\n\\nPolicy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-5820.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-009", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-009-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Case Note – Lost Property Claim (Lena Mora)\n\nOn May 12, Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked “LM.” The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A receptionist later added a note about a possible red band from a phone inquiry.\n\nOn May 13, the lost-property custodian personally inspected the stored item and issued a verified update, superseding all earlier entries: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, orange inventory band applied after recovery. This May 13 entry is the latest verified custody record available for the decision.\n\nThe complete decision record contains four claimant-to-item comparisons: three concern circumstances (bus number, date, and general appearance), all of which agree. The fourth is the sole identifying-detail comparison, concerning the lining code, which was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it and is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the item. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-4471. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LN-5820.\n\nPolicy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the 'latest verified update' policy and Lena Mora/May 12/bus 41/May 10 bindings unchanged from the original question; the counterfactual only swaps the lining-code value (LC-7729 vs LC-4413), a coherent single-fact change; the two evidence spans are plain factual claim statements, not policy text; and neither context states a score, rule mapping, or rationale beyond natural rubric terminology already permitted.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Property claim review for Lena Mora, filed May 12 regarding an umbrella left on bus 41 on May 10. The transit operator's original log and a receptionist's later phone-based addition are both superseded by the May 13 physical-inspection update, which is confirmed as the verified custody record and postdates every other entry for this item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons once the May 13 update is applied: three circumstance comparisons (recovery date, recovery location, and item type), all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. That sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code Lena Mora reported to the lining code recorded in the May 13 update. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is treated as a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-4413.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-010", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-010-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Property claim review for Lena Mora, filed May 12 regarding an umbrella left on bus 41 on May 10. The transit operator's original log and a receptionist's later phone-based addition are both superseded by the May 13 physical-inspection update, which is confirmed as the verified custody record and postdates every other entry for this item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons once the May 13 update is applied: three circumstance comparisons (recovery date, recovery location, and item type), all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. That sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code Lena Mora reported to the lining code recorded in the May 13 update. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is treated as a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the 'latest verified update' policy and Lena Mora/May 12/bus 41/May 10 bindings unchanged from the original question; the counterfactual only swaps the lining-code value (LC-7729 vs LC-4413), a coherent single-fact change; the two evidence spans are plain factual claim statements, not policy text; and neither context states a score, rule mapping, or rationale beyond natural rubric terminology already permitted.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"Property claim review for Lena Mora, filed May 12 regarding an umbrella left on bus 41 on May 10. The transit operator's original log and a receptionist's later phone-based addition are both superseded by the May 13 physical-inspection update, which is confirmed as the verified custody record and postdates every other entry for this item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons once the May 13 update is applied: three circumstance comparisons (recovery date, recovery location, and item type), all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. That sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code Lena Mora reported to the lining code recorded in the May 13 update. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is treated as a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-4413.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-010", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-010-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Property claim review for Lena Mora, filed May 12 regarding an umbrella left on bus 41 on May 10. The transit operator's original log and a receptionist's later phone-based addition are both superseded by the May 13 physical-inspection update, which is confirmed as the verified custody record and postdates every other entry for this item. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release. The complete decision record contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons once the May 13 update is applied: three circumstance comparisons (recovery date, recovery location, and item type), all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. That sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code Lena Mora reported to the lining code recorded in the May 13 update. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is treated as a distinctive identifying detail. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-7729. The May 13 physical-inspection update recorded the stored item's lining code as fabric-lining pattern LC-4413."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy language on verified updates superseding earlier entries and the unchanged questions object carries the rubric; the two focus sentences are complete factual statements, not policy text; the counterfactual coherently alters only the inspection's lining code to LC-9081-D without duplicating or contradicting other measurements; no answer, rule table, or rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \\\"LM.\\\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist initially added \\\"possible red band\\\" from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, orange inventory band applied after recovery, with a lining code newly recorded. This May 13 inspection is treated as the verified update that postdates and supersedes every earlier custody entry for the item. The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the stored item. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-9081-D.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-011", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-011-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \"LM.\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist initially added \"possible red band\" from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, orange inventory band applied after recovery, with a lining code newly recorded. This May 13 inspection is treated as the verified update that postdates and supersedes every earlier custody entry for the item. The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the stored item. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 2}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "public_services", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the original policy language on verified updates superseding earlier entries and the unchanged questions object carries the rubric; the two focus sentences are complete factual statements, not policy text; the counterfactual coherently alters only the inspection's lining code to LC-9081-D without duplicating or contradicting other measurements; no answer, rule table, or rationale is embedded in either context.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "supported", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "counterfactual": {"circumstance_comparison_count": "supported", "circumstances_agree": "supported", "detail_comparison_count": "supported", "lining_code_distinctive": "supported", "lining_code_is_compared": "supported", "lining_code_match": "refuted", "lining_code_nonpublic": "supported", "may13_update_latest": "supported", "may13_update_verified": "supported", "total_comparison_count": "supported"}, "remove_left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"lining_code_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"lining_code_match": "supported"}, "right": {"lining_code_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual status, count, comparison, or attribute; the focus atom is the factual equality of two lining codes rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on that equality and are jointly realizable: the reported code can either match or not match while remaining compared, distinctive, and previously undisclosed. Policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive latest-verified-update rule originating in the original state; the remaining rubric and release requirements are already retained in the questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree, while the complete record's sole identifying-detail comparison is a conflict involving a distinctive detail. The exact counts exclude an additional agreeing identifier or another comparison. This is sufficient for score 1 rather than scores 2 or 3, and the agreeing circumstances prevent score 0.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "All circumstance comparisons agree and the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive, nonpublic, and matching. The exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and establish that there are not multiple unique identifiers, satisfying score 2 while excluding score 3.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "may13_update_verified", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update for the stored item is a verified custody update."}, {"id": "may13_update_latest", "statement": "The May 13 physical-inspection update postdates every other custody entry available for the stored item when Lena Mora's release claim is decided."}, {"id": "total_comparison_count", "statement": "The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons after the May 13 update is applied."}, {"id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly three of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record are circumstance comparisons."}, {"id": "circumstances_agree", "statement": "Every circumstance comparison in the complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim agrees."}, {"id": "detail_comparison_count", "statement": "Exactly one of the four claimant-to-stored-item comparisons in the complete decision record is an identifying-detail comparison."}, {"id": "lining_code_is_compared", "statement": "The sole identifying-detail comparison relates the lining code reported by Lena Mora to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}, {"id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "statement": "The stored item's lining code was not disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported a lining code."}, {"id": "lining_code_distinctive", "statement": "The stored item's lining code is a distinctive identifying detail."}, {"id": "lining_code_match", "statement": "The lining code reported by Lena Mora is identical to the lining code recorded for the stored item in the May 13 physical-inspection update."}], "base_state_json": "\"On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \\\"LM.\\\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist initially added \\\"possible red band\\\" from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, orange inventory band applied after recovery, with a lining code newly recorded. This May 13 inspection is treated as the verified update that postdates and supersedes every earlier custody entry for the item. The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the stored item. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "lining_code_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B."}, {"path": [], "text": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}], "rules": [{"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances agree, but the complete record's sole identifying detail is distinctive and conflicts. The exact total and category counts exclude another matching identifier or unexamined comparison that could support a stronger outcome, so this is a weak possible match and release is denied pending stronger evidence.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "After applying the latest verified custody update, all three circumstances and the sole identifying detail agree. That detail is distinctive and nonpublic, and the exact comparison counts exclude any material conflict and exclude the multiple unique identifiers required for score 3. This is a strong probable match, releasable only after standard identity documentation.", "target": "2", "when": [{"atom_id": "may13_update_verified", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "may13_update_latest", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "total_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstance_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "circumstances_agree", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "detail_comparison_count", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_is_compared", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_nonpublic", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_distinctive", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "lining_code_match", "state": "supported"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B.", "negative_left": "Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B.", "negative_right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-9081-D.", "right": "The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-174-011", "id": "fast-43-diverse-174-011-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — No plausible match: the item type, recovery date or location, and identifying details are incompatible; deny release.", "1 — Weak possible match: only broad circumstances or common features agree, while one or more distinctive details conflict or are absent; deny release pending stronger evidence.", "2 — Strong probable match: circumstances and at least one nonpublic distinctive detail agree, with no material conflict; release only after standard identity documentation.", "3 — Confirmed match: circumstances and multiple unique identifiers, such as a serial number plus distinctive contents or markings, agree with the verified custody record; release after standard identity documentation."], "instructions": "Rate the claimant-to-item match confidence under the rubric below. Apply later verified custody updates over earlier preliminary entries, and determine whether the item may be released.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "On May 12, property claimant Lena Mora reported leaving a black umbrella on bus 41 on May 10, describing a wooden crook handle and red tape marked \"LM.\" The transit operator had logged a dark umbrella found on that bus and date. A civic facility receptionist initially added \"possible red band\" from a phone inquiry. On May 13, the lost-property custodian physically inspected the stored item and updated the record: navy folding umbrella, straight plastic handle, no initials, orange inventory band applied after recovery, with a lining code newly recorded. This May 13 inspection is treated as the verified update that postdates and supersedes every earlier custody entry for the item. The complete decision record for Lena Mora's claim contains exactly four claimant-to-item comparisons: three circumstance comparisons, all of which agree, and one identifying-detail comparison. The lining code was never disclosed to Lena Mora before she reported it, and it is considered a distinctive identifying feature of the stored item. Lena Mora reported the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-7742-B. The May 13 physical-inspection update records the stored item's lining code as pattern LC-9081-D. Policy requires using the latest verified update when deciding release."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-174", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "c8ba9af77fc41475b5c037bc8d2272f513c0da33ccb9d94af358cccfaaaf0f89", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "public_services-04", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same policy, entities, and evidence structure; the counterfactual coherently swaps the archive record type without contradicting other facts or revealing the score.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the focus atom concerns the evidence type of E-17 rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on whether E-17 is an interview transcript and are jointly realizable: in the counterfactual it can be some nonqualifying item. The policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive routing, advancement, accepted-evidence, and paraphrase rules originating in the original state. The readiness criteria and instructions remain automatically available through the unchanged questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and one submitted item that is an interview transcript, hence a qualifying attachment. That excludes level 0, while the missing source contacts exclude levels 2–4, making level 1 sufficient.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and exactly one candidate-evidence item that is neither a transcript, recording, nor linked public record. Thus there is no qualifying supporting material, which is sufficient for level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Pitch P is a reported pitch."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Pitch P is a neighborhood culture story."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Pitch P is routed to the City Life desk."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Pitch P contains zero named source contacts."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The submission manifest for pitch P contains exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type interview transcript."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type recording."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type linked public record."}], "base_state_json": "\"Submitting writer Lena Ortiz pitches 'The Rooftop Gardeners of Cedar Square,' a 1,200-word reported feature about apartment residents growing food overnight after late shifts. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material. The intake editor confirms the pitch is a reported feature about neighborhood culture and logs it to the City Life desk. Lena's submission form names zero source contacts and lists only one candidate-evidence item, item E-17, referenced by an internal tracking number. Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204. Checking the archive log for that intake record, the clerk finds: Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as an interview transcript. The managing editor now must assign the pitch a readiness score based on these findings.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204."}, {"path": [], "text": "Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as an interview transcript."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk."}, {"path": [], "text": "To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The correct desk is identified and the sole submitted evidence item is an interview transcript, so at least one qualifying attachment is supplied. Because the pitch has zero named source contacts, both required source contacts are still missing and the pitch must be held for major additions.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The desk is identifiable, but the pitch has zero named source contacts and its sole candidate-evidence item is neither an interview transcript, a recording, nor a linked public record. It therefore has no qualifying supporting material and cannot advance.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204.", "negative_left": "Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204.", "negative_right": "Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as a background photo.", "right": "Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as an interview transcript."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-215-039", "id": "fast-43-diverse-215-039-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Decline at intake: the desk can be identified, but the pitch has no qualifying supporting material and therefore cannot advance.", "1 — Hold for major additions: at least one identifiable source or qualifying attachment is supplied, but both required source contacts or an acceptable evidence type are still missing.", "2 — Conditionally advance: two named source contacts and one qualifying evidence type are present, but the reporting plan or article angle needs substantial clarification.", "3 — Advance to section review: all required support is present, the desk is appropriate, and only minor editorial questions remain.", "4 — Priority advance: all requirements are present, the desk fit is strong, and the pitch includes unusually complete, immediately usable reporting and a polished angle."], "instructions": "Route the pitch under the stated policy, verify its supporting material, decide whether it advances, and select the single readiness level that applies. Treat the writer’s paraphrase according to the explicit evidence rule.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Submitting writer Lena Ortiz pitches 'The Rooftop Gardeners of Cedar Square,' a 1,200-word reported feature about apartment residents growing food overnight after late shifts. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material. The intake editor confirms the pitch is a reported feature about neighborhood culture and logs it to the City Life desk. Lena's submission form names zero source contacts and lists only one candidate-evidence item, item E-17, referenced by an internal tracking number. Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204. Checking the archive log for that intake record, the clerk finds: Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as an interview transcript. The managing editor now must assign the pitch a readiness score based on these findings."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-215", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "532d99fb15debec3012555c7b5e1afe9f95ef6908cd4c88d9fccdb633bbef86c", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 1}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "media", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the same policy, entities, and evidence structure; the counterfactual coherently swaps the archive record type without contradicting other facts or revealing the score.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "supported", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a1": "supported", "a2": "supported", "a3": "supported", "a4": "supported", "a5": "supported", "a6": "refuted", "a7": "refuted", "a8": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a6": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a6": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a6": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a6": "supported"}, "right": {"a6": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom states a single factual relationship; the focus atom concerns the evidence type of E-17 rather than a policy conclusion. The base and counter assignments differ only on whether E-17 is an interview transcript and are jointly realizable: in the counterfactual it can be some nonqualifying item. The policy evidence correctly preserves the substantive routing, advancement, accepted-evidence, and paraphrase rules originating in the original state. The readiness criteria and instructions remain automatically available through the unchanged questions object.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and one submitted item that is an interview transcript, hence a qualifying attachment. That excludes level 0, while the missing source contacts exclude levels 2–4, making level 1 sufficient.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The conditions establish an identifiable/correct desk, zero named source contacts, and exactly one candidate-evidence item that is neither a transcript, recording, nor linked public record. Thus there is no qualifying supporting material, which is sufficient for level 0.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a1", "statement": "Pitch P is a reported pitch."}, {"id": "a2", "statement": "Pitch P is a neighborhood culture story."}, {"id": "a3", "statement": "Pitch P is routed to the City Life desk."}, {"id": "a4", "statement": "Pitch P contains zero named source contacts."}, {"id": "a5", "statement": "The submission manifest for pitch P contains exactly one candidate-evidence item, E-17."}, {"id": "a6", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type interview transcript."}, {"id": "a7", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type recording."}, {"id": "a8", "statement": "Within pitch P's submission, candidate-evidence item E-17 has evidence type linked public record."}], "base_state_json": "\"Submitting writer Lena Ortiz pitches 'The Rooftop Gardeners of Cedar Square,' a 1,200-word reported feature about apartment residents growing food overnight after late shifts. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material. The intake editor confirms the pitch is a reported feature about neighborhood culture and logs it to the City Life desk. Lena's submission form names zero source contacts and lists only one candidate-evidence item, item E-17, referenced by an internal tracking number. Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204. Checking the archive log for that intake record, the clerk finds: Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as an interview transcript. The managing editor now must assign the pitch a readiness score based on these findings.\"", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a6", "focus_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204."}, {"path": [], "text": "Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as an interview transcript."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": [], "text": "Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk."}, {"path": [], "text": "To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The correct desk is identified and the sole submitted evidence item is an interview transcript, so at least one qualifying attachment is supplied. Because the pitch has zero named source contacts, both required source contacts are still missing and the pitch must be held for major additions.", "target": "1", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The desk is identifiable, but the pitch has zero named source contacts and its sole candidate-evidence item is neither an interview transcript, a recording, nor a linked public record. It therefore has no qualifying supporting material and cannot advance.", "target": "0", "when": [{"atom_id": "a1", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a2", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a3", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a4", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a5", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a6", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a7", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a8", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204.", "negative_left": "Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204.", "negative_right": "Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as a background photo.", "right": "Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as an interview transcript."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-215-039", "id": "fast-43-diverse-215-039-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": ["0 — Decline at intake: the desk can be identified, but the pitch has no qualifying supporting material and therefore cannot advance.", "1 — Hold for major additions: at least one identifiable source or qualifying attachment is supplied, but both required source contacts or an acceptable evidence type are still missing.", "2 — Conditionally advance: two named source contacts and one qualifying evidence type are present, but the reporting plan or article angle needs substantial clarification.", "3 — Advance to section review: all required support is present, the desk is appropriate, and only minor editorial questions remain.", "4 — Priority advance: all requirements are present, the desk fit is strong, and the pitch includes unusually complete, immediately usable reporting and a polished angle."], "instructions": "Route the pitch under the stated policy, verify its supporting material, decide whether it advances, and select the single readiness level that applies. Treat the writer’s paraphrase according to the explicit evidence rule.", "type": "score"}}, "state": "Submitting writer Lena Ortiz pitches 'The Rooftop Gardeners of Cedar Square,' a 1,200-word reported feature about apartment residents growing food overnight after late shifts. Magazine policy routes neighborhood culture stories to the City Life desk. To advance, a reported pitch must include at least two named source contacts plus either interview transcripts, recordings, or linked public records; paraphrased recollections alone are not supporting material. The intake editor confirms the pitch is a reported feature about neighborhood culture and logs it to the City Life desk. Lena's submission form names zero source contacts and lists only one candidate-evidence item, item E-17, referenced by an internal tracking number. Pitch P's submission manifest lists candidate-evidence item E-17 as intake record IR-204. Checking the archive log for that intake record, the clerk finds: Intake record IR-204 is logged in the archive as a background photo. The managing editor now must assign the pitch a readiness score based on these findings."}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-215", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "532d99fb15debec3012555c7b5e1afe9f95ef6908cd4c88d9fccdb633bbef86c", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": 0}, "source_family": "media-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain all mandatory thresholds (price ≤520k, delivery ≤10 weeks, capacity ≥50/week, current ISO 9001) and the same entity/case PR-418 without adding exceptions; the counterfactual only changes the commercial_schedule price to $505,000, creating a plausible price discrepancy with the cover sheet while all other facts remain unchanged, which is coherent rather than a nonsensical duplicate; focus evidence consists of two complete factual sentences about price records with no policy text; neither context contains rule tables, proposition IDs, or explicit answer/route hints.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "supported"}, "right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The focus is the factual equality of two price records. The base and counter assignments are realizable: two prices can be equal and within the limit in the base, or unequal while both remain within the limit in the counter, with all other atom states unchanged. Policy evidence correctly preserves the requested scope and mandatory thresholds originating in the original state; routing instructions and criteria are already retained in the questions object and need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction confirms the complete requested scope, every stated mandatory threshold, and a current attached ISO 9001 certificate. It also excludes explicit technical deviations, stated exceptions, and other commercial terms, while confirming consistent acceptable prices. Therefore approval_ready is entailed.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The two submitted price records are established as unequal even though each is within the ceiling. This is contradictory price information, for which the explicit policy requires supplier clarification. The remaining conditions confirm scope and mandatory compliance and exclude competing technical, exception, and other-commercial-term triggers.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_price_record_match", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet is equal to the total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes exactly 200 hygienic pumps."}, {"id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes matching seals for every included hygienic pump."}, {"id": "a_commissioning_included", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes on-site commissioning."}, {"id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted delivery commitment for PR-418 is within 10 weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted production capacity for PR-418 is at least 50 pumps per week."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certificate is attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "statement": "The ISO 9001 certificate attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418 is current on the bid submission date."}, {"id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "statement": "Northstar Flow explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_stated_exception", "statement": "Northstar Flow states an exception to the requested scope or mandatory requirements in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_other_commercial_term", "statement": "Northstar Flow states a commercial term other than the total price in its submitted bid for PR-418."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"Procurement note for Northstar Flow's PR-418 quotation review. A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.\", \"scope\": \"Submitted scope includes 200 hygienic pumps with matching seals for each pump, plus on-site commissioning.\", \"schedule_capacity\": \"Delivery commitment is 8 weeks and production capacity is 65 pumps per week.\", \"certification\": \"A current ISO 9001 certificate, valid through next year, is attached to the bid.\", \"exceptions\": \"No exceptions to scope or mandatory requirements are stated, no technical substitutions or deviations are proposed, and no commercial terms other than total price are listed.\", \"price_records\": {\"cover_sheet\": \"Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.\", \"commercial_schedule\": \"Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.\"}}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_price_record_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["price_records", "cover_sheet"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418."}, {"path": ["price_records", "commercial_schedule"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The complete requested scope and every mandatory requirement are confirmed compliant, the two submitted price records agree, and no technical deviation, exception, or additional commercial term creates another routing condition.", "target": "approval_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The complete scope and non-price requirements are compliant and both recorded totals are within the mandatory ceiling, but the quotation cover sheet and signed commercial schedule contradict each other about the bid price, requiring supplier clarification.", "target": "supplier_clarification", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.", "negative_left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.", "negative_right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $505,000 for PR-418.", "right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-272-004", "id": "fast-43-diverse-272-004-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"approval_ready": "Route to the purchasing approver because the complete scope and all mandatory requirements are confirmed compliant.", "commercial_review": "Route for commercial review because the bid is complete but has an unacceptable price or other stated commercial term.", "reject_bid": "Reject because the evidence establishes a mandatory noncompliance that cannot be resolved through clarification.", "supplier_clarification": "Return to the supplier account representative because scope or exception information needed for a compliance judgment is missing or contradictory.", "technical_review": "Route to the technical specification owner because the supplier explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one route. Approve only when every mandatory requirement and the complete requested scope are confirmed. Use commercial review for a complete bid with unacceptable price or commercial terms; technical review for an explicit technical substitution or deviation; supplier clarification for missing or contradictory scope, exception, price, or schedule information; reject only for a clear mandatory noncompliance that clarification cannot resolve.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"certification": "A current ISO 9001 certificate, valid through next year, is attached to the bid.", "context": "Procurement note for Northstar Flow's PR-418 quotation review. A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.", "exceptions": "No exceptions to scope or mandatory requirements are stated, no technical substitutions or deviations are proposed, and no commercial terms other than total price are listed.", "price_records": {"commercial_schedule": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.", "cover_sheet": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418."}, "schedule_capacity": "Delivery commitment is 8 weeks and production capacity is 65 pumps per week.", "scope": "Submitted scope includes 200 hygienic pumps with matching seals for each pump, plus on-site commissioning."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-272", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "59208055b0c8d29732908ea8242ed7319782327cf77c5b5f1344432180983312", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "approval_ready"}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain all mandatory thresholds (price ≤520k, delivery ≤10 weeks, capacity ≥50/week, current ISO 9001) and the same entity/case PR-418 without adding exceptions; the counterfactual only changes the commercial_schedule price to $505,000, creating a plausible price discrepancy with the cover sheet while all other facts remain unchanged, which is coherent rather than a nonsensical duplicate; focus evidence consists of two complete factual sentences about price records with no policy text; neither context contains rule tables, proposition IDs, or explicit answer/route hints.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "supported"}, "right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The focus is the factual equality of two price records. The base and counter assignments are realizable: two prices can be equal and within the limit in the base, or unequal while both remain within the limit in the counter, with all other atom states unchanged. Policy evidence correctly preserves the requested scope and mandatory thresholds originating in the original state; routing instructions and criteria are already retained in the questions object and need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction confirms the complete requested scope, every stated mandatory threshold, and a current attached ISO 9001 certificate. It also excludes explicit technical deviations, stated exceptions, and other commercial terms, while confirming consistent acceptable prices. Therefore approval_ready is entailed.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The two submitted price records are established as unequal even though each is within the ceiling. This is contradictory price information, for which the explicit policy requires supplier clarification. The remaining conditions confirm scope and mandatory compliance and exclude competing technical, exception, and other-commercial-term triggers.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_price_record_match", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet is equal to the total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes exactly 200 hygienic pumps."}, {"id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes matching seals for every included hygienic pump."}, {"id": "a_commissioning_included", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes on-site commissioning."}, {"id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted delivery commitment for PR-418 is within 10 weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted production capacity for PR-418 is at least 50 pumps per week."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certificate is attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "statement": "The ISO 9001 certificate attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418 is current on the bid submission date."}, {"id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "statement": "Northstar Flow explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_stated_exception", "statement": "Northstar Flow states an exception to the requested scope or mandatory requirements in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_other_commercial_term", "statement": "Northstar Flow states a commercial term other than the total price in its submitted bid for PR-418."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\": \"Procurement note for Northstar Flow's PR-418 quotation review. A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.\", \"scope\": \"Submitted scope includes 200 hygienic pumps with matching seals for each pump, plus on-site commissioning.\", \"schedule_capacity\": \"Delivery commitment is 8 weeks and production capacity is 65 pumps per week.\", \"certification\": \"A current ISO 9001 certificate, valid through next year, is attached to the bid.\", \"exceptions\": \"No exceptions to scope or mandatory requirements are stated, no technical substitutions or deviations are proposed, and no commercial terms other than total price are listed.\", \"price_records\": {\"cover_sheet\": \"Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.\", \"commercial_schedule\": \"Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.\"}}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_price_record_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["price_records", "cover_sheet"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418."}, {"path": ["price_records", "commercial_schedule"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The complete requested scope and every mandatory requirement are confirmed compliant, the two submitted price records agree, and no technical deviation, exception, or additional commercial term creates another routing condition.", "target": "approval_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The complete scope and non-price requirements are compliant and both recorded totals are within the mandatory ceiling, but the quotation cover sheet and signed commercial schedule contradict each other about the bid price, requiring supplier clarification.", "target": "supplier_clarification", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.", "negative_left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418.", "negative_right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $505,000 for PR-418.", "right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-272-004", "id": "fast-43-diverse-272-004-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"approval_ready": "Route to the purchasing approver because the complete scope and all mandatory requirements are confirmed compliant.", "commercial_review": "Route for commercial review because the bid is complete but has an unacceptable price or other stated commercial term.", "reject_bid": "Reject because the evidence establishes a mandatory noncompliance that cannot be resolved through clarification.", "supplier_clarification": "Return to the supplier account representative because scope or exception information needed for a compliance judgment is missing or contradictory.", "technical_review": "Route to the technical specification owner because the supplier explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one route. Approve only when every mandatory requirement and the complete requested scope are confirmed. Use commercial review for a complete bid with unacceptable price or commercial terms; technical review for an explicit technical substitution or deviation; supplier clarification for missing or contradictory scope, exception, price, or schedule information; reject only for a clear mandatory noncompliance that clarification cannot resolve.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"certification": "A current ISO 9001 certificate, valid through next year, is attached to the bid.", "context": "Procurement note for Northstar Flow's PR-418 quotation review. A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.", "exceptions": "No exceptions to scope or mandatory requirements are stated, no technical substitutions or deviations are proposed, and no commercial terms other than total price are listed.", "price_records": {"commercial_schedule": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule lists a total price of $505,000 for PR-418.", "cover_sheet": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet lists a total price of $498,000 for PR-418."}, "schedule_capacity": "Delivery commitment is 8 weeks and production capacity is 65 pumps per week.", "scope": "Submitted scope includes 200 hygienic pumps with matching seals for each pump, plus on-site commissioning."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-272", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "59208055b0c8d29732908ea8242ed7319782327cf77c5b5f1344432180983312", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "supplier_clarification"}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the unchanged question/rubric and PR-418 entity/time bindings, the two evidence spans are plain factual statements about the total price with no policy or instruction text, and the counterfactual's altered second price ($505,300 vs $498,750) creates a plausible, non-leaking contradictory-price scenario consistent with the rest of the unchanged evidence rather than an incoherent duplicate measurement.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "supported"}, "right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The focus is the factual equality of two price records. The base and counter assignments are realizable: two prices can be equal and within the limit in the base, or unequal while both remain within the limit in the counter, with all other atom states unchanged. Policy evidence correctly preserves the requested scope and mandatory thresholds originating in the original state; routing instructions and criteria are already retained in the questions object and need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction confirms the complete requested scope, every stated mandatory threshold, and a current attached ISO 9001 certificate. It also excludes explicit technical deviations, stated exceptions, and other commercial terms, while confirming consistent acceptable prices. Therefore approval_ready is entailed.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The two submitted price records are established as unequal even though each is within the ceiling. This is contradictory price information, for which the explicit policy requires supplier clarification. The remaining conditions confirm scope and mandatory compliance and exclude competing technical, exception, and other-commercial-term triggers.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_price_record_match", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet is equal to the total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes exactly 200 hygienic pumps."}, {"id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes matching seals for every included hygienic pump."}, {"id": "a_commissioning_included", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes on-site commissioning."}, {"id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted delivery commitment for PR-418 is within 10 weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted production capacity for PR-418 is at least 50 pumps per week."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certificate is attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "statement": "The ISO 9001 certificate attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418 is current on the bid submission date."}, {"id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "statement": "Northstar Flow explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_stated_exception", "statement": "Northstar Flow states an exception to the requested scope or mandatory requirements in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_other_commercial_term", "statement": "Northstar Flow states a commercial term other than the total price in its submitted bid for PR-418."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.\",\"evidence\":[\"Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.\",\"Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.\",\"Both figures are within the $520,000 ceiling.\",\"Scope includes 200 pumps, matching seals for each, and on-site commissioning.\",\"Delivery is committed at 9 weeks; capacity is stated at 55 pumps per week.\",\"A current, dated ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the bid.\",\"No technical substitution, deviation, or exception is mentioned anywhere in the submission.\",\"No commercial term other than total price is stated.\"],\"request\":\"Select the required next route using the stated triage rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_price_record_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The complete requested scope and every mandatory requirement are confirmed compliant, the two submitted price records agree, and no technical deviation, exception, or additional commercial term creates another routing condition.", "target": "approval_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The complete scope and non-price requirements are compliant and both recorded totals are within the mandatory ceiling, but the quotation cover sheet and signed commercial schedule contradict each other about the bid price, requiring supplier clarification.", "target": "supplier_clarification", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.", "negative_left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.", "negative_right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $505,300.", "right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-272-009", "id": "fast-43-diverse-272-009-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"approval_ready": "Route to the purchasing approver because the complete scope and all mandatory requirements are confirmed compliant.", "commercial_review": "Route for commercial review because the bid is complete but has an unacceptable price or other stated commercial term.", "reject_bid": "Reject because the evidence establishes a mandatory noncompliance that cannot be resolved through clarification.", "supplier_clarification": "Return to the supplier account representative because scope or exception information needed for a compliance judgment is missing or contradictory.", "technical_review": "Route to the technical specification owner because the supplier explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one route. Approve only when every mandatory requirement and the complete requested scope are confirmed. Use commercial review for a complete bid with unacceptable price or commercial terms; technical review for an explicit technical substitution or deviation; supplier clarification for missing or contradictory scope, exception, price, or schedule information; reject only for a clear mandatory noncompliance that clarification cannot resolve.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.", "evidence": ["Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.", "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.", "Both figures are within the $520,000 ceiling.", "Scope includes 200 pumps, matching seals for each, and on-site commissioning.", "Delivery is committed at 9 weeks; capacity is stated at 55 pumps per week.", "A current, dated ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the bid.", "No technical substitution, deviation, or exception is mentioned anywhere in the submission.", "No commercial term other than total price is stated."], "request": "Select the required next route using the stated triage rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-272", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "59208055b0c8d29732908ea8242ed7319782327cf77c5b5f1344432180983312", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "approval_ready"}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts retain the unchanged question/rubric and PR-418 entity/time bindings, the two evidence spans are plain factual statements about the total price with no policy or instruction text, and the counterfactual's altered second price ($505,300 vs $498,750) creates a plausible, non-leaking contradictory-price scenario consistent with the rest of the unchanged evidence rather than an incoherent duplicate measurement.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "supported"}, "right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The focus is the factual equality of two price records. The base and counter assignments are realizable: two prices can be equal and within the limit in the base, or unequal while both remain within the limit in the counter, with all other atom states unchanged. Policy evidence correctly preserves the requested scope and mandatory thresholds originating in the original state; routing instructions and criteria are already retained in the questions object and need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction confirms the complete requested scope, every stated mandatory threshold, and a current attached ISO 9001 certificate. It also excludes explicit technical deviations, stated exceptions, and other commercial terms, while confirming consistent acceptable prices. Therefore approval_ready is entailed.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The two submitted price records are established as unequal even though each is within the ceiling. This is contradictory price information, for which the explicit policy requires supplier clarification. The remaining conditions confirm scope and mandatory compliance and exclude competing technical, exception, and other-commercial-term triggers.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_price_record_match", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet is equal to the total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes exactly 200 hygienic pumps."}, {"id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes matching seals for every included hygienic pump."}, {"id": "a_commissioning_included", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes on-site commissioning."}, {"id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted delivery commitment for PR-418 is within 10 weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted production capacity for PR-418 is at least 50 pumps per week."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certificate is attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "statement": "The ISO 9001 certificate attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418 is current on the bid submission date."}, {"id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "statement": "Northstar Flow explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_stated_exception", "statement": "Northstar Flow states an exception to the requested scope or mandatory requirements in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_other_commercial_term", "statement": "Northstar Flow states a commercial term other than the total price in its submitted bid for PR-418."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.\",\"evidence\":[\"Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.\",\"Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.\",\"Both figures are within the $520,000 ceiling.\",\"Scope includes 200 pumps, matching seals for each, and on-site commissioning.\",\"Delivery is committed at 9 weeks; capacity is stated at 55 pumps per week.\",\"A current, dated ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the bid.\",\"No technical substitution, deviation, or exception is mentioned anywhere in the submission.\",\"No commercial term other than total price is stated.\"],\"request\":\"Select the required next route using the stated triage rubric.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_price_record_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["evidence", "0"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750."}, {"path": ["evidence", "1"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The complete requested scope and every mandatory requirement are confirmed compliant, the two submitted price records agree, and no technical deviation, exception, or additional commercial term creates another routing condition.", "target": "approval_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The complete scope and non-price requirements are compliant and both recorded totals are within the mandatory ceiling, but the quotation cover sheet and signed commercial schedule contradict each other about the bid price, requiring supplier clarification.", "target": "supplier_clarification", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.", "negative_left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.", "negative_right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $505,300.", "right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-272-009", "id": "fast-43-diverse-272-009-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"approval_ready": "Route to the purchasing approver because the complete scope and all mandatory requirements are confirmed compliant.", "commercial_review": "Route for commercial review because the bid is complete but has an unacceptable price or other stated commercial term.", "reject_bid": "Reject because the evidence establishes a mandatory noncompliance that cannot be resolved through clarification.", "supplier_clarification": "Return to the supplier account representative because scope or exception information needed for a compliance judgment is missing or contradictory.", "technical_review": "Route to the technical specification owner because the supplier explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one route. Approve only when every mandatory requirement and the complete requested scope are confirmed. Use commercial review for a complete bid with unacceptable price or commercial terms; technical review for an explicit technical substitution or deviation; supplier clarification for missing or contradictory scope, exception, price, or schedule information; reject only for a clear mandatory noncompliance that clarification cannot resolve.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.", "evidence": ["Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 states a total price of $498,750.", "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 states a total price of $505,300.", "Both figures are within the $520,000 ceiling.", "Scope includes 200 pumps, matching seals for each, and on-site commissioning.", "Delivery is committed at 9 weeks; capacity is stated at 55 pumps per week.", "A current, dated ISO 9001 certificate is attached to the bid.", "No technical substitution, deviation, or exception is mentioned anywhere in the submission.", "No commercial term other than total price is stated."], "request": "Select the required next route using the stated triage rubric."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-272", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "59208055b0c8d29732908ea8242ed7319782327cf77c5b5f1344432180983312", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "supplier_clarification"}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep all four mandatory requirements (price, delivery, capacity, ISO 9001) intact and the unchanged question supplies the routing rubric, so governing policy is preserved; PR-418/Northstar Flow bindings are unchanged; the two focus_evidence spans are complete factual statements about differing price documents rather than policy text; the counterfactual's differing signed-schedule price ($505,300 vs $498,750) is a plausible discrepancy between two distinct documents, not a duplicate contradiction, fitting the stated reconciliation scenario; neither context states a route, rule table, or answer hint.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "supported"}, "right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The focus is the factual equality of two price records. The base and counter assignments are realizable: two prices can be equal and within the limit in the base, or unequal while both remain within the limit in the counter, with all other atom states unchanged. Policy evidence correctly preserves the requested scope and mandatory thresholds originating in the original state; routing instructions and criteria are already retained in the questions object and need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction confirms the complete requested scope, every stated mandatory threshold, and a current attached ISO 9001 certificate. It also excludes explicit technical deviations, stated exceptions, and other commercial terms, while confirming consistent acceptable prices. Therefore approval_ready is entailed.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The two submitted price records are established as unequal even though each is within the ceiling. This is contradictory price information, for which the explicit policy requires supplier clarification. The remaining conditions confirm scope and mandatory compliance and exclude competing technical, exception, and other-commercial-term triggers.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_price_record_match", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet is equal to the total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes exactly 200 hygienic pumps."}, {"id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes matching seals for every included hygienic pump."}, {"id": "a_commissioning_included", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes on-site commissioning."}, {"id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted delivery commitment for PR-418 is within 10 weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted production capacity for PR-418 is at least 50 pumps per week."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certificate is attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "statement": "The ISO 9001 certificate attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418 is current on the bid submission date."}, {"id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "statement": "Northstar Flow explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_stated_exception", "statement": "Northstar Flow states an exception to the requested scope or mandatory requirements in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_other_commercial_term", "statement": "Northstar Flow states a commercial term other than the total price in its submitted bid for PR-418."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.\",\"findings\":[\"Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.\",\"Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.\",\"Delivery is committed at 9 weeks.\",\"Production capacity is confirmed at 60 pumps per week.\",\"A current ISO 9001 certificate is attached and dated within the bid submission period.\",\"Scope confirms 200 hygienic pumps with matching seals for each pump and includes on-site commissioning.\",\"No technical substitution or deviation is proposed.\",\"No exception to scope or mandatory requirements is stated.\",\"No commercial term other than total price is mentioned.\"],\"note\":\"Specialist is verifying whether the two price records reconcile before determining next steps.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_price_record_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["findings", "0"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750."}, {"path": ["findings", "1"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The complete requested scope and every mandatory requirement are confirmed compliant, the two submitted price records agree, and no technical deviation, exception, or additional commercial term creates another routing condition.", "target": "approval_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The complete scope and non-price requirements are compliant and both recorded totals are within the mandatory ceiling, but the quotation cover sheet and signed commercial schedule contradict each other about the bid price, requiring supplier clarification.", "target": "supplier_clarification", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.", "negative_left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.", "negative_right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $505,300.", "right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-272-025", "id": "fast-43-diverse-272-025-base", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"approval_ready": "Route to the purchasing approver because the complete scope and all mandatory requirements are confirmed compliant.", "commercial_review": "Route for commercial review because the bid is complete but has an unacceptable price or other stated commercial term.", "reject_bid": "Reject because the evidence establishes a mandatory noncompliance that cannot be resolved through clarification.", "supplier_clarification": "Return to the supplier account representative because scope or exception information needed for a compliance judgment is missing or contradictory.", "technical_review": "Route to the technical specification owner because the supplier explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one route. Approve only when every mandatory requirement and the complete requested scope are confirmed. Use commercial review for a complete bid with unacceptable price or commercial terms; technical review for an explicit technical substitution or deviation; supplier clarification for missing or contradictory scope, exception, price, or schedule information; reject only for a clear mandatory noncompliance that clarification cannot resolve.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.", "findings": ["Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.", "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.", "Delivery is committed at 9 weeks.", "Production capacity is confirmed at 60 pumps per week.", "A current ISO 9001 certificate is attached and dated within the bid submission period.", "Scope confirms 200 hygienic pumps with matching seals for each pump and includes on-site commissioning.", "No technical substitution or deviation is proposed.", "No exception to scope or mandatory requirements is stated.", "No commercial term other than total price is mentioned."], "note": "Specialist is verifying whether the two price records reconcile before determining next steps."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-272", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "59208055b0c8d29732908ea8242ed7319782327cf77c5b5f1344432180983312", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "approval_ready"}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "base"}
{"domain": "supply_chain", "evidence_certificate": {"context_audit": {"counterfactual_is_coherent": true, "evidence_is_two_factual_sentences": true, "explanation": "Both contexts keep all four mandatory requirements (price, delivery, capacity, ISO 9001) intact and the unchanged question supplies the routing rubric, so governing policy is preserved; PR-418/Northstar Flow bindings are unchanged; the two focus_evidence spans are complete factual statements about differing price documents rather than policy text; the counterfactual's differing signed-schedule price ($505,300 vs $498,750) is a plausible discrepancy between two distinct documents, not a duplicate contradiction, fitting the stated reconciliation scenario; neither context states a route, rule table, or answer hint.", "no_answer_leakage": true, "policy_preserved": true, "question_bindings_preserved": true}, "fact_states": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "full_context_fact_states": {"base": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "supported", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "counterfactual": {"a_capacity_meets_minimum": "supported", "a_commissioning_included": "supported", "a_cover_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_delivery_within_limit": "supported", "a_explicit_technical_deviation": "refuted", "a_iso_certificate_attached": "supported", "a_iso_certificate_current": "supported", "a_matching_seals_complete": "supported", "a_other_commercial_term": "refuted", "a_price_record_match": "refuted", "a_pump_quantity_complete": "supported", "a_schedule_price_within_limit": "supported", "a_stated_exception": "refuted"}, "remove_left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "remove_right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "necessity_checks_passed": true, "pair_fact_states": {"left": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "negative_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "refuted"}, "negative_sentence": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}, "positive_pair": {"a_price_record_match": "supported"}, "right": {"a_price_record_match": "unknown"}}, "pipeline_version": "evidence-curation-v3", "rule_audit": {"assignments_are_realizable": true, "atoms_are_atomic": true, "explanation": "Each atom expresses a single factual relationship rather than a policy conclusion. The focus is the factual equality of two price records. The base and counter assignments are realizable: two prices can be equal and within the limit in the base, or unequal while both remain within the limit in the counter, with all other atom states unchanged. Policy evidence correctly preserves the requested scope and mandatory thresholds originating in the original state; routing instructions and criteria are already retained in the questions object and need not be duplicated.", "focus_is_factual": true, "policy_complete": true, "rule_checks": [{"reason": "The conjunction confirms the complete requested scope, every stated mandatory threshold, and a current attached ISO 9001 certificate. It also excludes explicit technical deviations, stated exceptions, and other commercial terms, while confirming consistent acceptable prices. Therefore approval_ready is entailed.", "rule_index": 0, "sound": true}, {"reason": "The two submitted price records are established as unequal even though each is within the ceiling. This is contradictory price information, for which the explicit policy requires supplier clarification. The remaining conditions confirm scope and mandatory compliance and exclude competing technical, exception, and other-commercial-term triggers.", "rule_index": 1, "sound": true}]}, "spec": {"atoms": [{"id": "a_price_record_match", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet is equal to the total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "statement": "The total price on Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 is at or below $520,000."}, {"id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes exactly 200 hygienic pumps."}, {"id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes matching seals for every included hygienic pump."}, {"id": "a_commissioning_included", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted scope for PR-418 includes on-site commissioning."}, {"id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted delivery commitment for PR-418 is within 10 weeks."}, {"id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "statement": "Northstar Flow’s submitted production capacity for PR-418 is at least 50 pumps per week."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "statement": "An ISO 9001 certificate is attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "statement": "The ISO 9001 certificate attached to Northstar Flow’s submitted bid for PR-418 is current on the bid submission date."}, {"id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "statement": "Northstar Flow explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_stated_exception", "statement": "Northstar Flow states an exception to the requested scope or mandatory requirements in its submitted bid for PR-418."}, {"id": "a_other_commercial_term", "statement": "Northstar Flow states a commercial term other than the total price in its submitted bid for PR-418."}], "base_state_json": "{\"context\":\"A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.\",\"findings\":[\"Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.\",\"Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.\",\"Delivery is committed at 9 weeks.\",\"Production capacity is confirmed at 60 pumps per week.\",\"A current ISO 9001 certificate is attached and dated within the bid submission period.\",\"Scope confirms 200 hygienic pumps with matching seals for each pump and includes on-site commissioning.\",\"No technical substitution or deviation is proposed.\",\"No exception to scope or mandatory requirements is stated.\",\"No commercial term other than total price is mentioned.\"],\"note\":\"Specialist is verifying whether the two price records reconcile before determining next steps.\"}", "base_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "counter_states": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}], "focus_atom": "a_price_record_match", "focus_evidence": [{"path": ["findings", "0"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750."}, {"path": ["findings", "1"], "text": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750."}], "policy_evidence": [{"path": ["context"], "text": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate."}], "rules": [{"justification": "The complete requested scope and every mandatory requirement are confirmed compliant, the two submitted price records agree, and no technical deviation, exception, or additional commercial term creates another routing condition.", "target": "approval_ready", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}, {"justification": "The complete scope and non-price requirements are compliant and both recorded totals are within the mandatory ceiling, but the quotation cover sheet and signed commercial schedule contradict each other about the bid price, requiring supplier clarification.", "target": "supplier_clarification", "when": [{"atom_id": "a_price_record_match", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_cover_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_schedule_price_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_pump_quantity_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_matching_seals_complete", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_commissioning_included", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_delivery_within_limit", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_capacity_meets_minimum", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_attached", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_iso_certificate_current", "state": "supported"}, {"atom_id": "a_explicit_technical_deviation", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_stated_exception", "state": "refuted"}, {"atom_id": "a_other_commercial_term", "state": "refuted"}]}]}, "verified_pair": {"left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.", "negative_left": "Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.", "negative_right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $505,300.", "right": "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750."}, "verifier_independent_model": false}, "family": "fast-43-diverse-272-025", "id": "fast-43-diverse-272-025-counterfactual", "input": {"questions": {"decision": {"criteria": {"approval_ready": "Route to the purchasing approver because the complete scope and all mandatory requirements are confirmed compliant.", "commercial_review": "Route for commercial review because the bid is complete but has an unacceptable price or other stated commercial term.", "reject_bid": "Reject because the evidence establishes a mandatory noncompliance that cannot be resolved through clarification.", "supplier_clarification": "Return to the supplier account representative because scope or exception information needed for a compliance judgment is missing or contradictory.", "technical_review": "Route to the technical specification owner because the supplier explicitly proposes a technical substitution or deviation."}, "instructions": "Choose exactly one route. Approve only when every mandatory requirement and the complete requested scope are confirmed. Use commercial review for a complete bid with unacceptable price or commercial terms; technical review for an explicit technical substitution or deviation; supplier clarification for missing or contradictory scope, exception, price, or schedule information; reject only for a clear mandatory noncompliance that clarification cannot resolve.", "type": "choice"}}, "state": {"context": "A procurement specialist is triaging Northstar Flow’s quotation for PR-418: 200 hygienic pumps, matching seals, and on-site commissioning. Mandatory requirements are a total price at or below $520,000, delivery within 10 weeks, capacity of at least 50 pumps per week, and a current ISO 9001 certificate.", "findings": ["Northstar Flow’s quotation cover sheet for PR-418 lists a total price of $498,750.", "Northstar Flow’s signed commercial schedule for PR-418 lists a total price of $505,300.", "Delivery is committed at 9 weeks.", "Production capacity is confirmed at 60 pumps per week.", "A current ISO 9001 certificate is attached and dated within the bid submission period.", "Scope confirms 200 hygienic pumps with matching seals for each pump and includes on-site commissioning.", "No technical substitution or deviation is proposed.", "No exception to scope or mandatory requirements is stated.", "No commercial term other than total price is mentioned."], "note": "Specialist is verifying whether the two price records reconcile before determining next steps."}}, "method": "c2d", "provenance": {"source_id": "diverse-272", "source_is_synthetic": true, "source_sha256": "59208055b0c8d29732908ea8242ed7319782327cf77c5b5f1344432180983312", "source_split": "train"}, "quality_status": "evidence_model_checked", "reference": {"human_reviewed": false, "source": "audited_rule_over_verified_facts", "target": "supplier_clarification"}, "source_family": "supply_chain-01", "split": "validation", "variant": "counterfactual"}