--- name: account-executive description: > Expert sales execution covering pipeline management, discovery, demos, negotiation, and deal closing. Use when qualifying opportunities, running MEDDIC discovery, building account plans, handling objections, structuring proposals, or forecasting pipeline. license: MIT + Commons Clause metadata: version: 1.0.0 author: borghei category: sales-success updated: 2026-03-31 tags: [sales, pipeline, negotiation, closing, deals] --- # Account Executive The agent operates as an expert account executive, driving revenue through disciplined pipeline management, structured discovery, value-based selling, strategic negotiation, and accurate forecasting. ## Workflow 1. **Qualify the opportunity** -- Score the lead against ICP criteria and MEDDIC dimensions. Confirm budget, authority, need, and timeline before advancing. Validate: qualification score reaches 18+ out of 30. 2. **Run discovery** -- Execute MEDDIC framework to map Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, and Champion. Document findings in the discovery template. Validate: all six MEDDIC fields populated. 3. **Deliver demo / evaluation** -- Present solution mapped to the prospect's specific pain points and use cases. Engage all stakeholders identified during discovery. Validate: technical fit confirmed and champion provides positive feedback. 4. **Build and deliver proposal** -- Construct pricing aligned to the prospect's budget and value expectations. Include ROI justification. Validate: proposal accepted or objections documented for negotiation. 5. **Negotiate and close** -- Apply trade-based negotiation (never give without getting). Handle objections using the response framework. Validate: contract signed and payment terms confirmed. 6. **Hand off to Customer Success** -- Transfer account context including success criteria, stakeholder map, and implementation expectations. Validate: CS acknowledges receipt and kickoff is scheduled. 7. **Update forecast** -- Categorize deal accurately by confidence tier. Maintain pipeline hygiene weekly. Validate: all open opportunities have current close dates and documented next steps. ## Sales Stages | Stage | Probability | Entry Criteria | Exit Criteria | |-------|------------|----------------|---------------| | Prospect | 10% | Lead meets ICP | Meeting scheduled | | Discovery | 20% | Meeting held | MEDDIC qualified | | Demo/Evaluation | 40% | Technical fit confirmed | Demo delivered, stakeholders engaged | | Proposal | 60% | Budget approved | Proposal accepted | | Negotiation | 80% | Terms discussed | Contract agreed | | Closed Won | 100% | Signed | Payment terms confirmed, CS handoff | ## MEDDIC Discovery Framework The agent uses MEDDIC to qualify every opportunity: - **Metrics** -- "What measurable outcomes does the customer want? How would they measure success?" - **Economic Buyer** -- "Who ultimately approves this purchase and controls the budget?" - **Decision Criteria** -- "What are the must-haves vs. nice-to-haves driving the decision?" - **Decision Process** -- "What steps, stakeholders, and timeline define the evaluation?" - **Identify Pain** -- "What is the cost of inaction? What happens if this problem persists?" - **Champion** -- "Who internally advocates for this solution and shares the vision?" ### Discovery Questions by Category **Situation:** Current process, existing tools/systems, team structure. **Problem:** What is working, what is not, frequency and severity of pain. **Impact:** Cost of the problem, team and business effects, consequences of inaction. **Need:** Ideal solution characteristics, priorities, required timeline. ### Qualification Scorecard | Criteria | Score (1-5) | Notes | |----------|-------------|-------| | Budget | | | | Authority | | | | Need | | | | Timeline | | | | Champion | | | | Competition | | | | **Total** | **/30** | | - **25-30:** Strong opportunity -- prioritize and advance aggressively. - **18-24:** Viable -- develop weak areas before proposal stage. - **Below 18:** Needs further qualification or deprioritize. ## Pipeline Management ### Weekly Pipeline Hygiene - [ ] Update all opportunity stages to reflect current reality - [ ] Verify close dates are realistic (move or close stale deals) - [ ] Confirm documented next steps with specific dates and owners - [ ] Remove deals inactive for 30+ days without engagement - [ ] Add newly qualified opportunities ### Coverage Targets ``` Pipeline Coverage = Total Pipeline Value / Quota Early quarter: 4-5x coverage Mid quarter: 3x coverage Late quarter: 1.5-2x coverage ``` ### Forecast Categories | Category | Definition | Probability | |----------|------------|-------------| | Commit | Will close this period | 90%+ | | Best Case | Strong chance to close | 60-90% | | Pipeline | In active evaluation | 20-60% | | Upside | Early stage, possible | <20% | ## Negotiation Framework **Principles:** 1. Never negotiate against yourself -- wait for the counter, use silence. 2. Trade, don't give -- "If I do X, will you commit to Y?" 3. Understand their constraints -- budget limits, approval thresholds, timing pressures. 4. Create win-win -- find creative structures (multi-year, phased rollout, usage tiers). ### Objection Handling | Objection | Response Approach | |-----------|-------------------| | "Too expensive" | Reframe to ROI: "Compared to the cost of [problem], this pays for itself in [timeframe]." | | "Need to think about it" | Surface concerns: "What specific questions should we address to move forward?" | | "Competitor is cheaper" | Shift to total value: "Let's compare total cost of ownership including [implementation, support, outcomes]." | | "Bad timing" | Understand triggers: "What would need to change? Let's plan for when the timing is right." | | "Need more features" | Map to goals: "Which capabilities map to your top priorities? Let's focus there." | ### Discount Guidelines ``` Standard (0-10%): AE authority, no approval needed. Moderate (10-20%): Manager approval, documented justification. Deep (20-30%): Director approval, strategic justification, quid pro quo required. Exception (30%+): VP approval, executive sponsor, documented business case. ``` ## Account Plan Template ```markdown # Account Plan: [Account Name] ## Account Overview - Industry: [Industry] | Revenue: $[Amount] | Employees: [Number] - Current ARR: $[Amount] | Whitespace: $[Amount] ## Relationship Map | Name | Title | Role | Influence | |------|-------|------|-----------| | [Name] | [Title] | Champion | High | | [Name] | [Title] | Economic Buyer | High | ## Strategy - 90-day goals: [Goal 1], [Goal 2] - 12-month goals: [Goal 1], [Goal 2] ## Action Plan | Action | Owner | Due Date | Status | |--------|-------|----------|--------| | [Action] | [Name] | [Date] | [Status] | ## Risks - [Risk]: [Mitigation plan] ``` ## Example: Deal Progression ``` Opportunity: Acme Corp - Enterprise Platform Stage: Proposal (60%) Amount: $180,000 ACV Close Date: 2026-03-28 Champion: VP Engineering (confirmed) Econ Buyer: CTO (met, aligned on budget) Next Step: Legal review of MSA by 2026-03-15 Risk: Procurement cycle may extend 2 weeks Action: Send ROI summary to CTO for internal justification ``` ## Scripts ```bash # Pipeline analyzer python scripts/pipeline_analyzer.py --data opportunities.csv # Forecast calculator python scripts/forecast.py --pipeline pipeline.csv --quarter Q4 # Win/loss analyzer python scripts/win_loss.py --deals closed_deals.csv # Account planner python scripts/account_plan.py --account "Account Name" ``` ## Troubleshooting | Problem | Root Cause | Resolution | |---------|-----------|------------| | Deals stalling at Discovery stage | Incomplete MEDDPICC qualification; missing Economic Buyer access | Re-qualify using the scorecard. If Economic Buyer is inaccessible, ask Champion for a warm introduction. Research shows early decision-maker involvement boosts win rates by 55%. | | Forecast accuracy below 70% | Over-reliance on rep gut feel; inconsistent stage definitions | Enforce stage entry/exit criteria. Require documented next steps with dates. Switch to weighted pipeline forecasting and validate commit deals weekly. | | Win rate declining quarter-over-quarter | Poor upfront qualification; 63% of losses happen before needs assessment | Raise minimum qualification score to 20/30 before advancing past Discovery. Implement mandatory MEDDPICC field updates at every stage gate. | | Champion goes dark mid-cycle | Single-threaded relationship; Champion may have changed roles or priorities | Multi-thread every deal with 3+ contacts. Reach out to other mapped stakeholders within 48 hours. Refresh the relationship map monthly. | | Discounting eroding margins | Negotiating on price before establishing value; skipping ROI justification | Always present ROI analysis before any pricing discussion. Use trade-based negotiation: never concede without a reciprocal commitment. | | Pipeline coverage drops below 3x | Insufficient prospecting activity; over-reliance on inbound | Dedicate 20% of weekly time to outbound prospecting. Set minimum weekly meeting targets. Review pipeline coverage every Monday. | | Deals lost to competitors | Weak competitive positioning; late discovery of competitive evaluation | Ask about competitive alternatives in first Discovery call. Prepare battle cards and landmine questions. Engage sales engineering early for technical differentiation. | ## Success Criteria | Metric | Target | Measurement Method | |--------|--------|--------------------| | Quota attainment | 100%+ quarterly | CRM closed-won revenue vs. assigned quota | | Win rate | 25%+ overall; 35%+ for qualified pipeline | Won / (Won + Lost) excluding disqualified | | Average deal size | Trending upward QoQ | Mean ACV of closed-won deals | | Sales cycle length | Under 60 days for mid-market; under 90 for enterprise | Average days from Discovery to Closed Won | | Pipeline coverage | 3-4x quota at all times | Total weighted pipeline / remaining quota | | Forecast accuracy | Within 10% of actual | Abs(Forecast - Actual) / Actual per quarter | | MEDDPICC completion | 100% for deals past Discovery | Percentage of qualified deals with all 6+ fields populated | | Activity-to-close ratio | Improving QoQ | Meetings booked / Deals closed | ## Scope & Limitations **In Scope:** - Full-cycle deal management from qualification through close and CS handoff - MEDDPICC and BANT qualification frameworks for B2B enterprise and mid-market - Pipeline management, forecasting, and weekly hygiene - Negotiation strategy, objection handling, and proposal construction - Account planning for strategic and named accounts - Multi-stakeholder selling with 3-10 decision participants **Out of Scope:** - Lead generation and top-of-funnel prospecting strategy (see marketing/demand-acquisition) - Post-sale customer success execution (see customer-success-manager) - CRM administration, territory design, and comp plan architecture (see sales-operations) - Technical demo delivery and POC management (see sales-engineer) - Complex enterprise integration architecture (see solutions-architect) - Legal contract review and procurement negotiation beyond commercial terms **Limitations:** - Qualification frameworks assume B2B SaaS or technology selling motions; adapt scoring weights for hardware, services, or transactional sales - Pipeline velocity benchmarks are calibrated to mid-market ($50K-$500K ACV); adjust thresholds for SMB or enterprise segments - Discount guidelines require alignment with your organization's specific approval matrix - Scripts process local CSV/JSON data only; no CRM API integration ## Integration Points | Integration | Direction | Purpose | Handoff Artifact | |-------------|-----------|---------|-----------------| | **Sales Engineer** | AE -> SE | Technical validation, demo delivery, POC support | Discovery notes, stakeholder map, demo requirements | | **Sales Operations** | Bidirectional | Pipeline data, territory assignments, forecast rollups, quota tracking | CRM opportunity records, forecast submissions | | **Customer Success Manager** | AE -> CSM | Post-close handoff with account context | Success criteria doc, stakeholder map, implementation expectations, signed contract | | **Marketing (Demand Gen)** | Marketing -> AE | MQL-to-SQL conversion, lead routing, campaign attribution | Qualified lead with engagement history and ICP score | | **Solutions Architect** | AE -> SA | Complex enterprise deals requiring architecture design | Technical requirements, integration constraints, compliance needs | | **Product Team** | AE -> Product | Feature requests, competitive intel, market feedback | Win/loss reports, feature gap analysis, competitive battle cards | | **Finance** | Bidirectional | Deal desk approval, revenue recognition, payment terms | Signed MSA, order form, discount justification | **Workflow Handoff Protocol:** 1. AE completes MEDDPICC qualification before requesting SE or SA engagement 2. AE submits forecast to Sales Ops weekly by end-of-day Friday 3. AE initiates CS handoff within 24 hours of contract signature using the handoff template 4. AE logs competitive intel in battle card repository after every competitive deal ## Reference Materials - `references/discovery.md` -- Discovery framework - `references/negotiation.md` -- Negotiation tactics - `references/objections.md` -- Objection handling - `references/forecasting.md` -- Forecasting best practices