--- name: interview-me description: Interactive interview to formalize a research idea into a structured specification with hypotheses and empirical strategy. disable-model-invocation: true argument-hint: "[brief topic or 'start fresh']" allowed-tools: ["Read", "Write"] --- ## Research Interview Conduct a structured interview through 6 phases to formalize a research idea. ### Interview Phases 1. **The Big Picture** -- What phenomenon or puzzle are you investigating? Why does it matter? 2. **Theoretical Motivation** -- What's your intuition for the mechanism? What does theory predict? 3. **Data and Setting** -- What data do you have? What specific context or time period? 4. **Identification** -- Any natural experiments or policy changes? What are the threats to causality? 5. **Expected Results** -- What do you predict? What are the implications for policy or theory? 6. **Contribution** -- How does this differ from existing work? What's the value-added? ### Protocol - Ask questions **one at a time** (no multi-question dumps) - Probe deeper based on answers -- follow up on weak spots - Be curious, not prescriptive - Know when to stop (after 5-8 meaningful exchanges) ### Output After the interview, produce a **Research Specification Document**: ```markdown # Research Specification: [Topic] ## Research Question [Clear, specific, answerable] ## Motivation [Why this matters -- policy relevance, theoretical gap, empirical puzzle] ## Hypothesis [Testable prediction with expected sign/magnitude] ## Empirical Strategy - **Method:** [DiD, IV, RDD, etc.] - **Treatment/Variation:** [What provides identification] - **Control group:** [Comparison group] - **Identifying assumption:** [What must hold] - **Robustness checks:** [Planned sensitivity analyses] ## Data [Sources, sample, key variables, time period] ## Expected Results [What you expect to find and why] ## Contribution [How this advances the literature] ## Open Questions [What remains uncertain] ``` Save to `quality_reports/research_spec_[sanitized_topic].md`.