--- name: advmat-writing-style description: Use when polishing the prose of an Advanced Materials manuscript for Wiley house style, concision, precise materials nomenclature and units, and readability across materials subfields. Polishes language; does not restructure the advance or manage the length budget. --- # Advanced Materials Writing Style (advmat-writing-style) ## When to trigger - Prose is wordy, hedged, or dense with un-glossed jargon - Materials nomenclature, chemical formulae, or units are inconsistent - A reader from a neighboring materials subfield would stumble on the opening - The draft narrates the experiment chronologically instead of arguing the advance - You are in late polish, after the science, characterization, and figures are stable ## Wiley / Adv. Mater. house-style essentials - **Concision serves impact.** Adv. Mater. prizes a crisp, high-signal narrative; every sentence should advance the structure → property → function argument. - **Argue, don't log.** Write "the doping raises carrier density, which lifts conductivity to X" — not "first we synthesized, then we measured, then we observed." - **Nomenclature discipline.** Define every abbreviation and material acronym on first use; keep chemical formulae, phase labels, and sample names identical across text, figures, and SI. - **Units and numbers.** SI units throughout, consistent significant figures, a space between number and unit, and every headline metric with its uncertainty and measurement conditions. - **British or American English** consistently (Wiley accepts either) — do not mix within a manuscript. - **References** follow the current Wiley Advanced Materials style; cite the prior art that establishes novelty and the work a reader needs to trust the characterization. ## Concision moves | Wordy pattern | Tightened | |---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------| | "It is worth noting that the material exhibits" | "The material exhibits" | | "In order to investigate" | "To probe" | | "We have successfully synthesized" | "We synthesized" (drop "successfully") | | "Due to the fact that" | "Because" | | "novel and unprecedented" (stacked novelty claims) | one calibrated claim, tied to the design rule | | Restating every figure value in prose | interpret the figure; don't transcribe it | | A background paragraph before the result | one-sentence context, then the advance | Adv. Mater. abstracts and openings are notorious for hype-word inflation ("novel," "unprecedented," "significantly," "remarkable"). Delete the adjective and let the number and the mechanism carry the claim. ## Readability across subfields Adv. Mater. is read across materials chemistry, physics, energy, electronics, and biomaterials — a battery reviewer may assess a photovoltaics paper. So: - Open with materials context a non-specialist grasps before introducing subfield notation. - Gloss a specialized concept in one clause rather than assuming it. - Put the physical/chemical interpretation next to every key metric. - Prefer the spelled-out concept over acronym soup where space allows. ## Worked micro-rewrite (Adv. Mater. register) **Before (log-style, hype-stacked, un-benchmarked):** > "In this work, a novel and unprecedented material was successfully synthesized via a facile method. It was found that the sample exhibits remarkably enhanced performance, which is significantly higher than previous works and may have great potential for future applications." **After (advance-first, calibrated, benchmarked):** > "We report a layered oxide whose expanded interlayer spacing accommodates reversible multivalent intercalation. The resulting cathode delivers 220 mAh g⁻¹ at 1C with 92% capacity retention over 500 cycles — outperforming the best reported oxides of this family (Table 1) — because the spacing suppresses lattice strain during cycling." What changed: "novel/unprecedented/facile/remarkable/significant" all deleted; the metric arrives with conditions and a benchmark; the mechanism ("spacing suppresses strain") replaces vague "great potential." ## Precision discipline - State claims at the strength the evidence supports — no over- or under-claiming. - "Significantly" means statistically significant, not "a lot." - Quote uncertainty and conditions with every headline number. - Present tense for established facts; past tense for what you did. ## Checklist - [ ] Every sentence advances the structure → property → function argument - [ ] All abbreviations, formulae, and sample names defined and consistent across text/figures/SI - [ ] Hype words ("novel," "unprecedented," "remarkable") removed or earned - [ ] Opening readable by an out-of-subfield materials scientist - [ ] Interpretation accompanies every key metric; conditions and uncertainty stated - [ ] SI units, consistent significant figures, number–unit spacing - [ ] One English variant used consistently - [ ] References follow current Wiley Advanced Materials style ## Anti-patterns - Hype-word inflation instead of a benchmarked, mechanistic claim - Undefined acronyms or drifting sample names between text, figures, and SI - Chronological lab-log narration instead of an argument - Prose that transcribes figure values instead of interpreting them - Subfield jargon in the opening that excludes the broad readership - Mixed British/American spelling within one manuscript ## Output format ``` 【Concision / de-hype pass】done? yes / list 【Nomenclature】abbreviations, formulae, sample names consistent? yes / fix 【Broad readability】opening accessible out-of-subfield? yes / fix 【Interpretation + conditions on every metric】yes / fix 【Claim calibration】matched to evidence? yes / fix 【Next】advmat-length-management (fit format) or advmat-cover-letter ``` > Reference and typesetting conventions are set by Wiley and evolve — verify current Advanced Materials style on the official author page.