--- name: amanthro-writing-style description: Use when drafting or polishing an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it reads across all four fields, follows AA house style (Chicago author-date; free-format submission accepted), fits the section word caps (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words; abstract 200 words), and uses inclusive, care-ful language. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content. --- # Writing Style (amanthro-writing-style) An AA paper must be readable by an anthropologist outside its subfield, written with the craft AA prizes (strong ethnographic prose, a clear argument, reflexive voice), formatted to **Chicago author-date**, and disciplined to the section's word cap. AA also asks for **inclusive language** and **citational practices that lift marginalized voices** — style here is partly an ethical commitment. ## When to trigger - Drafting the introduction, framing the contribution, or final polish - Over the word cap and needing to cut without losing the argument or the ethnography - Writing the **200-word abstract** - Aligning citations/format to AA house style before submission ## Reach all four fields 1. **Front-load the contribution.** By the end of the introduction the reader knows the question, the argument, the evidence, and why it matters to anthropology broadly — don't make a generalist dig. 2. **Minimize subfield jargon** or define it on first use; an archaeologist should follow a linguistic paper. Spell out acronyms; gloss technical terms. 3. **Argument-first, but keep the craft.** AA values vivid ethnographic writing and a reflexive voice; lead with claims and let well-chosen scenes and evidence carry them. Avoid both dry report prose and description with no argument. 4. **Write with care.** Use **inclusive language**; represent interlocutors and communities with dignity (avoid deficit framing); consider **citational politics** in who you cite and foreground. ## Format to AA house style - **Citations:** **Chicago Manual of Style author-date**; AA accepts **free-format** submissions (you need not perfectly style-conform at first submission), but keep one consistent style and include **DOIs** where available. Manage with Zotero/BibTeX. - **Abstract:** **200 words**. - **Anonymize:** AA review is **anonymous** — no author names/affiliations in the manuscript or file name; supply a separate title page; neutralize obvious self-references and strip file metadata. - **Land acknowledgment / positionality:** include where appropriate to the work and community. ## Fit the word cap (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words incl. figures, tables, references, notes; abstract 200) - Tighten throat-clearing and literature dumps; engage the conversation, not every paper (see `amanthro-literature-positioning`). - Choose the scenes and exhibits that argue; cut redundant description. - Notes count toward the limit — keep them lean. - If the piece is short and engaged, target the right section (Essay 2,000–3,000; Commentary ≤ 1,500; Review Essay ≤ 5,000) rather than padding toward a Research Article. ## Anti-patterns - A subfield-insider intro that never states four-field significance - Burying the contribution under pages of description before the argument appears - An abstract over 200 words or one that hides the finding - Deficit or othering language toward communities; a "view from nowhere" with no positionality - A bibliography that foregrounds only metropolitan theorists - Padding an Essay/Commentary toward Research-Article length ## Output format ``` 【Contribution stated by end of intro?】[Y/N] 【Reads across the four fields?】jargon defined / acronyms spelled? [Y/N] 【Abstract】word count (≤ 200) 【Word count】Research Article ≤ 8,000 (incl. figures/tables/refs/notes)? 【Chicago author-date + anonymized + DOIs】[Y/N] 【Care-ful language + citational politics】[Y/N] 【Next】amanthro-transparency-and-data ``` ## Supplementary resources - [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — word/abstract caps, Chicago author-date, anonymity, inclusive-language guidance - [`../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md`](../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md) — before→after AA-style introduction