--- name: devpsych-workflow description: Use when starting or navigating any Developmental Psychology (APA) manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing a manuscript length tier or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and by the developmental design (cross-sectional, longitudinal/cohort, micro-genetic, experiment with minors); it dispatches, it does not draft content. --- # Developmental Psychology Workflow Router (devpsych-workflow) The orchestrator for a Developmental Psychology submission. This APA journal publishes empirical work on **development across the life span**, and its defining demand is a credible claim about **developmental change** — age effects, within-person change, or trajectories — reported under **APA 7th + JARS**, with **masked review** and **Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP)** expectations. The router makes sure the developmental claim, the design, and the open-science package are all handled, then dispatches. ## When to trigger - Starting a new Developmental Psychology paper and unsure where to begin - Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next - Choosing a length tier (brief report vs. larger report vs. multi-study/longitudinal report) - Returning with a decision letter (route to `devpsych-rebuttal`) ## First question: what kind of developmental claim and design? | Situation | Design | Route note | |-----------|--------|-----------| | Age differences at one time point | **Cross-sectional** | name the age/cohort confound early (`devpsych-study-design`) | | Within-person change over time | **Longitudinal / cohort** | attrition + measurement invariance are load-bearing | | Process of change in close-up | **Micro-genetic** | dense sampling; justify granularity | | Causal manipulation with minors | **Experiment** | ethics/assent + age-appropriate task validity | | Re-using a large panel (e.g., NICHD, ECLS) | **Secondary analysis** | declare provenance, derived measures, version | ## Routing map (stage → skill) ```text Idea / fit + age scope? → devpsych-topic-selection Developmental theory + hypotheses? → devpsych-theory-and-hypotheses Where does it sit in the field? → devpsych-literature-positioning Design / power / invariance / age? → devpsych-study-design Growth-curve / multilevel / SEM? → devpsych-data-analysis Trajectory exhibits (APA)? → devpsych-tables-figures APA 7th + Public Significance? → devpsych-writing-style Data/materials + preregistration? → devpsych-open-science-and-transparency How will it be judged (masked)? → devpsych-review-process Ready to submit (Editorial Mgr)? → devpsych-submission Got an R&R / decision? → devpsych-rebuttal ``` ## Default order `topic-selection → theory-and-hypotheses → literature-positioning → study-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → open-science-and-transparency → review-process → submission → rebuttal` If the design is **prospective and confirmatory**, pull `study-design` and `open-science-and-transparency` forward so a preregistration and a sample-size justification exist *before* data collection. ## Worked micro-example — routing a live project (illustrative) A team has a three-wave accelerated longitudinal study of self-regulation (ages 4, 6, 8; some attrition), fitting growth curves, and a reviewer-anticipated worry about measurement invariance. The router walks them: ``` Claim: within-person growth in effortful control, age 4→8. Design: longitudinal/cohort (accelerated) → invariance + attrition are central. Entry: not idea-stage; they are at design hardening + analysis. Route: study-design (invariance test plan; attrition/FIML; age-vs-cohort) → data-analysis (latent growth / multilevel; time coding) → tables-figures (spaghetti + mean-trajectory plot, CIs) → writing-style (APA 7th; Public Significance Statement) → open-science-and-transparency (data/scripts; prereg if confirmatory) → submission (masked preflight) ; on R&R → rebuttal. Flag: test longitudinal measurement invariance BEFORE interpreting change. ``` ## Stage-triage table (symptom → skill) | What the author says | Stage | Route to | |----------------------|-------|----------| | "Is age difference enough, or do I need change?" | fit | `devpsych-topic-selection` | | "Reviewer: is your construct the same at every age?" | design/analysis | `devpsych-study-design` + `devpsych-data-analysis` | | "Cross-sectional age effect — but is it cohort?" | design | `devpsych-study-design` | | "Where does the Public Significance Statement go?" | writing | `devpsych-writing-style` | | "Do I need to share data and preregister?" | transparency | `devpsych-open-science-and-transparency` | | "I have an R&R" | revision | `devpsych-rebuttal` | ## Routing pitfalls specific to this venue - Sending an age-comparison straight to `devpsych-data-analysis` without first separating **age from cohort** and confirming **measurement invariance** — the change claim collapses if the construct shifts. - Deferring `devpsych-open-science-and-transparency`; under TOP, deposits and a preregistration are far cheaper to build before data than to retrofit at acceptance. ## Anti-patterns - Treating a cross-sectional age difference as developmental change without addressing cohort confounds - Interpreting trajectories before establishing longitudinal measurement invariance - Forgetting the Public Significance Statement (an APA requirement on the abstract page) - Ignoring masked-review anonymization in the manuscript or in shared links ## Output format ``` 【Stage】idea / theory / positioning / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut 【Design】cross-sectional / longitudinal-cohort / micro-genetic / experiment / secondary 【Route to】devpsych- 【Why】one line 【Then】the next skill after that ``` ## Supplementary resources - [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — longitudinal/SEM tooling, power, preregistration, developmental data archives - [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official Developmental Psychology URLs behind every fact in this pack