--- name: ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing description: Use when targeting IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing or deciding whether a signal-processing methods manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the algorithm-plus-analysis bar, the baseline-and-guarantee expectation, the regular-paper-vs-correspondence framing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. --- # IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing) ## Journal positioning IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing is the archival venue for the theory and methods of signal processing: estimation, detection, sampling and reconstruction, filtering, spectral analysis, and array, graph, and statistical signal processing, together with the optimization machinery that underpins them. The defining expectation is a **new signal-processing method with analysis** — an algorithm whose behavior is characterized (consistency, convergence, performance bounds, identifiability) or that demonstrably outperforms correct, current baselines under a clear model. A generic machine-learning paper, or an application study that merely runs an existing pipeline on new data, is a poor fit. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing author information and submission system. ## When to trigger - The author names this journal for an estimation, detection, sampling, or array/graph signal-processing manuscript and wants a fit/framing check. - A method must be re-framed from "our algorithm gives good results" into a result with a signal model, analysis, and the right baselines. - The author is choosing between this Transactions and an applications-oriented SP venue, a machine-learning venue, or `ieee-transactions-on-communications`. - The author needs the SP-theoretic framing bar and desk-reject heuristics specific to signal-processing methods. ## Scope & topic fit - Statistical signal processing: parameter estimation, detection and hypothesis testing, Cramér–Rao-type bounds, Bayesian and robust estimation. - Sampling, reconstruction, and sparse/compressive methods; sampling theory beyond Nyquist; dictionary and subspace methods with recovery guarantees. - Array and sensor-array processing: beamforming, direction-of-arrival, source localization, distributed and networked sensing. - Graph signal processing and signal processing over networks: spectral methods, filtering, and sampling on graphs. - Optimization for signal processing: convex/nonconvex methods, ADMM and proximal algorithms, with convergence or optimality analysis tied to an SP problem. ## Method & evidence bar - The contribution is a **method with analysis**: an estimator/detector/algorithm whose properties (bias/variance, consistency, convergence rate, identifiability, recovery conditions) are characterized, or a clearly superior empirical result. - Baselines must be the correct, current competitors under the same signal model and conditions; beating a strawman or an outdated method is not evidence. - When the claim is empirical, experiments must use realistic models, report variance across trials, and isolate the source of improvement; when the claim is theoretical, proofs must be complete. - The signal/observation model and assumptions must be explicit; performance claims must hold under those assumptions, with sensitivity to model mismatch discussed. - Position precisely against prior SP results: tighter bound, weaker assumptions, lower complexity, or a genuinely new processing principle. ## Structure & house style - IEEE format; the journal publishes full **Regular Papers** and shorter **Correspondence** items — match the article type to the contribution and re-check current definitions on the live guide. - The signal model and problem statement come early and precisely; the proposed method and its analysis are the core, with derivations in-text or in appendices. - The introduction motivates the SP gap, not an application novelty; relate the method to classical SP theory. - Figures are analytical and comparative: MSE-vs-SNR curves, ROC curves, convergence plots, and benchmark comparisons under matched conditions. ## Official-submission checklist - Before giving submission-ready advice, read `../../resources/source-basis.md` and `../../resources/official-source-map.md`; start from the IEEE Author Center anchors, then cite the current Signal Processing page you checked. - Search the live site for "IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing information for authors" and follow the current submission-system version. - Re-check article types (Regular Paper vs. Correspondence), length/overlength policy, and the IEEE template. - Confirm reproducibility expectations: code/data availability and reproducible-research practices for any empirical claims. - Re-check ORCID, competing-interests, funding, author-contribution, and AI-use disclosure requirements, and IEEE open-access options. - If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win. ## Pre-submission self-check - [ ] The contribution is an SP method with analysis or a clearly superior result under a stated signal model — not a generic ML pipeline on new data. - [ ] Baselines are the correct, current competitors under matched conditions. - [ ] Theoretical claims have complete proofs; empirical claims report variance and isolate the improvement's source. - [ ] The signal/observation model and assumptions are explicit, with model-mismatch sensitivity discussed. - [ ] Novelty is pinned to a specific SP-theoretic gain (tighter bound / weaker assumptions / lower complexity / new principle). - [ ] Article type and length fit current limits. ## Common desk-reject triggers - A generic machine-learning or deep-learning method with no signal-processing theory or model-based framing. - Application-only study running an existing SP pipeline on a new dataset with no methodological contribution. - Empirical gains over weak or outdated baselines, or with no reported variance across trials. - Algorithm proposed with no analysis and no guarantee, where the analysis was the expected contribution. - Scope mismatch: a communications-system or control paper using SP vocabulary without an SP-theoretic result. ## Re-routing decision - Communication-system design/performance is the core → `ieee-transactions-on-communications`. - Wireless PHY/MAC and resource allocation → `ieee-transactions-on-wireless-communications`. - Information-theoretic limits rather than estimators/detectors → `ieee-transactions-on-information-theory`. - Control/estimation as a dynamical-systems theorem → `ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control` / `automatica`. - Broad tutorial synthesis of an SP area → `proceedings-of-the-ieee`. ## Output format ```text [Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason) [Target] IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing [Topic tags] <2–3 closest SP subtopics> [Method + analysis] [Baselines] [Top risk] [Article type] Regular Paper / Correspondence [Official items to re-check]
[Re-route suggestion] ```