--- name: icml-workflow description: Use when planning or sequencing an ICML manuscript workflow end to end - from topic selection and drafting through OpenReview submission, double-blind review, author response, camera-ready, PMLR publication, public original-submission release, and rerouting decisions. Use when you need the next ICML skill, the official page to reopen, or the blocking gap for the current stage. --- # ICML Workflow Use this as the router for the ICML depth pack. It chooses the next skill and keeps policy, evidence, artifact, and public-record risks visible. ICML is a conference, not a journal: it has no standing editor-in-chief and no article-processing charge. The rotating leadership is the per-edition General Chair and Program Chairs (2026 General Chair: Tong Zhang; Program Chairs: Dudik, Jaggi, Agarwal, Li, verified 2026-06-22), and the cost model is registration fees, not APCs — PMLR proceedings are open-access with no author fee. Conference organizers rotate yearly, so re-check the current CFP and committees page rather than carrying a name forward. ## Stage map 1. Fit and track: `icml-topic-selection`. 2. Drafting: `icml-writing-style`, `icml-related-work`, `icml-experiments`. 3. Artifact and supplement: `icml-artifact-evaluation`, `icml-reproducibility`, `icml-supplementary`. 4. Pre-submission audit: `icml-submission`. 5. Review diagnosis: `icml-review-process`. 6. Rebuttal and discussion: `icml-author-response`. 7. Accepted-paper work: `icml-camera-ready`. ## Working principles - Start with the current ICML official pages, not last year's memory. - Maintain a table mapping claims to main-paper evidence, appendix evidence, code/data, and limitations. - Keep anonymous review artifacts and public release artifacts as separate states. - Treat reciprocal reviewing, reviewer LLM policy, impact statements, lay summaries, and public original-submission release as first-class workflow items. - Decide early whether a paper is really an ICML main-track paper or better suited to a position paper, workshop, NeurIPS, ICLR, AISTATS, TMLR, JMLR, or a domain venue. ## Deadline cadence (verify against the current CFP) ICML runs an abstract deadline before the full-paper deadline, and the 2026 cycle freezes the author list at the abstract stage. Treat the cadence as: abstract and author list locked, then full PDF and supplement, then reviews, then the response window, then one discussion round, then decisions, then camera-ready and the PMLR-bound proceedings. Never hard-code the exact dates here; reopen the current year's CFP because they move annually. ## Stage-to-risk router | Stage | Dominant ICML risk | First skill to open | | --- | --- | --- | | Fit | Wrong track (main vs Position Papers) | `icml-topic-selection` | | Drafting | Claim outruns evidence in 8 pages | `icml-writing-style`, `icml-experiments` | | Pre-submission | Anonymity or page-limit desk reject | `icml-submission` | | Response | One-round rebuttal misallocated | `icml-author-response` | | Accepted | Public-record exposure on OpenReview | `icml-camera-ready` | ## Worked routing pass A team has an adaptive-optimizer paper with a convergence proof and ImageNet-scale benchmarks. The router sends them first to topic selection (confirm main-track, not Position Papers), then to experiments and writing-style for the tuned-baseline and compute-disclosure gaps, then to submission for the OpenReview and format-checker audit. Each handoff records the official page to reopen so the plan never relies on last year's remembered rules. After decisions, an accepted paper flows to camera-ready with its public-record state in mind, while a rejected one loops back to topic selection or reroute, carrying the reviewer-quotable issue into the next venue choice. ## Output format ```text [Current stage] fit / drafting / pre-submission / review / response / camera-ready / reroute [Next skill] [Official source to open] [Blocking gap] [Next action] ```