--- name: jel-classification-system description: Use when assigning JEL classification codes to a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey and relating the survey to the JEL code taxonomy that the journal itself maintains. Explains and applies the codes correctly; it does not write prose (jel-writing-style) or run the submission preflight (jel-submission). --- # JEL Classification System (jel-classification-system) ## When to trigger - The survey is drafted and you must assign JEL classification codes for submission - You are unsure how many codes, at what level, or in what order to list them - You want the survey's *scope* to map cleanly onto the JEL taxonomy a reader uses to find it - You are reasoning about which JEL category the field you are surveying actually sits in ## What the JEL classification system is (and why JEL owns it) The **JEL classification system** is the American Economic Association's subject taxonomy for economics, *maintained by the Journal of Economic Literature itself* and used across EconLit and most economics journals. A survey for JEL therefore has a dual relationship with the codes: it must be **indexed** by them like any paper, and — because JEL is the system's steward — a well-scoped survey often *corresponds to* one or a small set of categories that define its field. **Structure (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准):** - **Three levels.** A single **letter** (20 top categories), a **two-digit** subcategory (e.g. `J2`), and a **three-character** detailed code (e.g. `J24`). - Assign **detailed three-character codes** for a submission; the letter/two-digit levels locate the field. **The 20 top-level categories:** | | | | | |---|---|---|---| | A General Economics & Teaching | B History of Thought / Methodology / Heterodox | C Mathematical & Quantitative Methods | D Microeconomics | | E Macroeconomics & Monetary | F International Economics | G Financial Economics | H Public Economics | | I Health, Education & Welfare | J Labor & Demographic Economics | K Law & Economics | L Industrial Organization | | M Business Admin / Marketing / Accounting / Personnel | N Economic History | O Development, Innovation, Growth | P Political Economy & Comparative Systems | | Q Agricultural, Resource & Environmental | R Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, Transport | Y Miscellaneous | Z Other Special Topics | ## Assigning codes to a survey 1. **Find the field's home category** first (the letter), then the subcategory, then detailed codes — top-down, so you do not miss the natural primary code. 2. **Lead with the field's primary detailed code**, then add codes for the *methods* and *adjacent fields* the survey substantively covers (a survey is broader than a paper, so a handful of codes is normal). 3. **Mirror the organizing framework.** The codes should look like the survey's cells: if a section covers an econometric method the field relies on, include the relevant `C` code; if it spans into public economics, include the `H` code. 4. **Cross-check against the EconLit code list** for the exact current label and three-character code — labels and codes are revised; do not assign from memory (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). 5. **Confirm count/format limits** for the manuscript in the AEA JEL style guide via `jel-submission` (JEL codes are commonly listed with keywords on the title page). > Because JEL *maintains* the classification system, a survey is in an unusual position: it can illuminate where a field sits in the taxonomy, and occasionally a maturing field's survey is part of the case that a code's scope should be reconsidered. You are not assigning codes from outside the system — you are working inside the AEA's own subject map, so get the codes exactly right. ## Checklist - [ ] Primary detailed (three-character) code identified top-down (letter → two-digit → detailed) - [ ] Method codes (e.g. `C`) and adjacent-field codes added where the survey substantively covers them - [ ] Code set mirrors the organizing framework's cells (not a random scatter) - [ ] Each code verified against the current EconLit JEL code list (label + three-character form) - [ ] Primary code listed first; codes ordered by centrality to the survey - [ ] Count/format limits confirmed in the AEA JEL style guide (via `jel-submission`) - [ ] Not over-coding: only categories the survey genuinely covers ## Anti-patterns - Assigning only a single broad letter-level code to a wide-ranging survey (under-indexing) - Scattering a dozen codes for fields the survey barely touches (over-indexing) - Inventing or mis-remembering three-character codes instead of checking the live EconLit list - Codes that contradict the organizing framework (the survey's own map of its scope) - Treating the codes as an afterthought rather than a true description of the field's place in economics ## Output format ``` 【Field home】 → → 【Code set】 【Framework mirror】codes match the survey's cells? Y/N 【Verification】each code checked on current EconLit list? Y/N 【Format】count/placement confirmed in AEA JEL style guide? Y/N 【Next step】→ jel-editor-strategy / jel-submission (codes go on the title page with keywords) ```