--- name: jim-workflow description: Use when starting or unblocking a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript and you need to pick the right jim-* sub-skill for the current stage, from first idea through the response letter. It routes to the specialist skills; it does not do their work. --- # JIM Workflow Router (jim-workflow) ## Overview Router skill for manuscripts aimed at the *Journal of International Marketing* (JIM) — the American Marketing Association's specialist top journal for **international marketing**, published quarterly by **SAGE** (ISSN 1069-031X print / 1547-7215 online; founded 1993 by S. Tamer Cavusgil). Editor-in-Chief: **Ayşegül Özsomer** (Koç University), in office since 2024 — re-check the masthead on ama.org before relying on it (checked 2026-07-16). Submission runs through **ScholarOne** (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ama_jim), review is **double-anonymized**, the abstract cap is **200 words**, and the whole manuscript — title through print appendices — must fit **50 formatted pages**. What makes JIM unlike its AMA siblings (JM, JMR, JPP&M) is a single gate every paper must clear: the **international dimension has to be the theoretical engine**, not the setting. Crossing a border must change the theory — through cultural, institutional, or economic variation across countries — and the empirics must earn cross-national comparison, usually via multi-country data with **measurement invariance** evidence. A solid domestic study relabeled "…in emerging markets" is the house desk-reject. ## When to trigger - A user asks "where do I start?" or "what's next?" on a JIM-bound project - A draft is stuck and nobody can name the binding constraint - The team is debating JIM vs. JIBS, International Marketing Review, or Journal of Marketing - A decision letter from JIM has arrived and revision work needs sequencing - Someone proposes adding a second country "for the reviewers" — a routing question in disguise ## Routing table | Symptom | Route to | |---------|----------| | Unclear whether the question is genuinely international | `jim-topic-selection` | | Culture/institutions invoked but not theorized; mechanism vague | `jim-theory-development` | | Cannot state what the paper adds to the international marketing conversation | `jim-literature-positioning` | | Country sampling, translation, invariance plan, or design unsettled | `jim-methods` | | MGCFA, multilevel models, or multi-country panels need running/reporting | `jim-data-analysis` | | Contribution reads as "we replicated X abroad" | `jim-contribution-framing` | | Exhibits sprawl past the 50-page cap or hide the cross-national result | `jim-tables-figures` | | Prose is fine English but not JIM's voice; abstract over 200 words | `jim-writing-style` | | Ready to build the ScholarOne package | `jim-submission` | | Waiting on / anticipating the editorial process | `jim-review-process` | | Revising against a JIM decision letter | `jim-rebuttal` | ## Default order 1. `jim-topic-selection` — verify the border-crossing is doing theoretical work 2. `jim-theory-development` — theorize the cross-national mechanism a priori 3. `jim-literature-positioning` — stake the claim in the international marketing canon 4. `jim-methods` — design the multi-country study: sampling, translation, invariance plan 5. `jim-data-analysis` — invariance tests, multilevel/SEM estimation, country effects 6. `jim-contribution-framing` — the theory payoff plus the cross-border managerial payoff 7. `jim-tables-figures` — invariance table, country descriptives, model figure, page budget 8. `jim-writing-style` — 200-word abstract and intro written last 9. `jim-submission` — ScholarOne two-file preflight 10. `jim-review-process` — calibrate expectations while under review 11. `jim-rebuttal` — after the decision letter Loop back freely: a failed scalar-invariance test at step 5 often forces a return to step 4 (or even step 2, if only partial invariance survives and the theory leaned on mean comparisons). ## Entry point by archetype | Archetype | First hard question | Enter at | |-----------|--------------------|----------| | Multi-country consumer survey | will the scales pass invariance across these countries? | `jim-methods` | | Cross-cultural experiment | is culture manipulated/measured, or just implied by location? | `jim-theory-development` | | Export / entry-mode secondary data | does the panel identify anything beyond correlations? | `jim-methods` | | Global branding / GCC study | globalness theorized or asserted? | `jim-theory-development` | | Meta-analysis of international effects | country-level moderators coded a priori? | `jim-literature-positioning` | | Short Insight paper (<4,000 words) | is one sharp finding enough to stand alone? | `jim-contribution-framing` | ## Minimal decision snippet ``` if decision_letter: -> jim-rebuttal elif submitting_this_week: -> jim-submission elif exhibits_or_page_budget: -> jim-tables-figures elif estimation_or_invariance: -> jim-data-analysis elif design_or_sampling: -> jim-methods elif contribution_fuzzy: -> jim-contribution-framing / jim-literature-positioning elif mechanism_untheorized: -> jim-theory-development else: -> jim-topic-selection ``` ## Anti-patterns - Sending a single-country paper to JIM because the sample "happens to be foreign" — the classic desk reject - Treating culture as a post-hoc explanation for a surprise result instead of a hypothesized construct - Polishing prose or exhibits while the invariance evidence is still unsettled - Confusing JIM with JIBS (general international business) or IMR — the boundary is a positioning task, not a coin flip - Citing the editor, portal, or page limits from memory instead of re-checking ama.org / the SAGE author page ## Output format ```text 【Target】Journal of International Marketing (JIM) 【Archetype】multi-country survey / cross-cultural experiment / export panel / global branding / meta / Insight 【International engine】what the border-crossing does for the theory (one line) 【Bottleneck】topic / theory / positioning / design / analysis / framing / exhibits / style / submission / revision 【Next skill】 【Fact status】volatile facts (editor, limits, portal) verified 2026-07-16 or flagged re-check ```