--- name: jmcb-workflow description: Use when deciding which jmcb-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills. --- # JMCB Workflow Router (jmcb-workflow) ## Overview This is the router. It names **which jmcb-* skill to use at the current stage** of a manuscript aimed at the *Journal of Money, Credit and Banking* (JMCB) — the monetary-economics, banking, and macro-finance outlet **owned by the Ohio State University Department of Economics and published by Wiley-Blackwell** (founded 1969). JMCB rewards **policy-relevant** work that bridges theory and evidence on monetary transmission, bank balance sheets, credit frictions, and central-bank policy — whether the engine is a monetary/banking model (DSGE, search-and-matching banks) or empirics (SVAR, local projections, high-frequency monetary surprises, micro-banking panels). Operational tells you are at JMCB and not a sibling: submission runs through **Editorial Express** (not Wiley's ScholarOne or Editorial Manager); there is a **submission fee** (US$150 subscriber / US$200 non-subscriber, refunded minus US$50 if desk-rejected; waived for resubmissions — 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准); the journal **strongly recommends ≤40 pages** including references, tables, and figures but **excluding the online appendix**; and it carries the historical **JMCB Data Archive** legacy (the Dewald–Thursby–Anderson 1986 replication study and the 2006 "Got Replicability?" follow-up were both about this journal). Editors as of 2026 include Sanjay Chugh and Pok-sang Lam (OSU), Robert DeYoung (Kansas), and Kenneth D. West (待核实；以官网为准). ## When to trigger - The user asks "what should I do next?" on a JMCB-targeted paper - A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed (fit, identification, evidence, exhibits, submission) - Work is ping-ponging between the model/empirics, framing, exhibits, and the response letter - A JMCB decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode - The team is weighing JMCB against the Journal of Monetary Economics, AEJ:Macro, Review of Economic Dynamics, or the Journal of Banking & Finance ## Routing table | Current symptom | Next skill | |-----------------|------------| | Scope/audience fit uncertain; might be a JME or JBF paper instead | `jmcb-topic-selection` | | Contribution vs. the monetary/banking frontier is fuzzy or undersold | `jmcb-literature-positioning` | | Macro identification (SVAR/narrative/HF surprises) or micro-banking causal design is shaky | `jmcb-identification` | | Bank/central-bank data construction, measurement, or sample is fragile | `jmcb-empirical-design` | | Results may be specification-, sample-, or inference-sensitive | `jmcb-robustness` | | Exhibits are dense; IRFs/coefficient plots do not answer the question | `jmcb-tables-figures` | | Online appendix is too thin, too sprawling, or carries main claims | `jmcb-internet-appendix` | | Intro/abstract bury the policy message; prose misses the JMCB voice | `jmcb-writing-style` | | Close to submission; need the 40-page + Editorial Express preflight | `jmcb-submission` | | Likely objections (and which editor desk) should be anticipated | `jmcb-referee-strategy` | | A decision letter or referee report needs a response plan | `jmcb-rebuttal` | ## Default order 1. `jmcb-topic-selection` — lock the monetary/banking/macro-finance question and policy stakes 2. `jmcb-literature-positioning` — stake the contribution vs. JME, AEJ:Macro, RED, JBF 3. `jmcb-identification` — macro identification or micro-banking causal design 4. `jmcb-empirical-design` — bank/central-bank data, measurement, sample construction 5. `jmcb-robustness` — specification, sample, and inference fragility 6. `jmcb-tables-figures` — IRFs, coefficient plots, balance-sheet tables that read cleanly 7. `jmcb-internet-appendix` — offload supporting material; keep the 40-page core self-contained 8. `jmcb-writing-style` — make the policy idea land (abstract + intro last) 9. `jmcb-submission` — Editorial Express preflight, fee, page limit, data exemption 10. `jmcb-referee-strategy` — anticipate objections before submitting 11. `jmcb-rebuttal` — after the R&R > `jmcb-writing-style` is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before identification and the evidence hierarchy settle. `jmcb-referee-strategy` is most useful *before* submission (to harden the paper) and again when a report lands. ## Anti-patterns - Treating JMCB as interchangeable with the **Journal of Monetary Economics** (more theory/field-macro depth) or **AEJ:Macro** (general-interest macro) — JMCB prizes the policy bridge and institutional detail - Routing a pure corporate-finance or asset-pricing paper here when it belongs at **JBF** or a finance field journal - Letting `jmcb-tables-figures` polish IRFs while the SVAR identification is still moving - Deferring the data/code question to acceptance — the journal's replication heritage means referees ask early - Polishing prose before the contribution and evidence hierarchy are stable ## Routing by paper archetype JMCB spans four engines, and the binding constraint differs by engine. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link. | Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at | |-----------|-------------------------|----------| | Quantitative monetary/banking model (DSGE, banking-friction) | what disciplines the parameters; policy-relevant counterfactual | `jmcb-identification` → `jmcb-empirical-design` | | Macro identification (SVAR / narrative / HF monetary surprises) | shock identification + IRF inference | `jmcb-identification` | | Micro-banking causal design (bank/loan-level panel) | clustering, weak-IV, staggered-policy bias | `jmcb-identification` → `jmcb-empirical-design` | | Measurement / policy-evaluation (central-bank, regulation) | data construction + robustness to sample/window | `jmcb-empirical-design` → `jmcb-robustness` | ## Worked routing example (illustrative) A user says: "My local-projection estimates of how a monetary-policy shock hits small-bank lending look fine, but a referee says the shock is contaminated by the Fed's information effect and the bank panel SEs are understated." Those are two distinct JMCB pushbacks — *shock identification* (informationally robust high-frequency surprises, à la the information-effect critique) and *inference* (clustering at the bank and time level). Route to `jmcb-identification` first to clean the shock, then `jmcb-robustness` for two-way clustering and a Driscoll–Kraay alternative; only once the lending elasticity is stable (say it settles at −1.8%, illustrative) return to `jmcb-tables-figures` and `jmcb-rebuttal`. ## Where the pack overlaps and how to sequence Three pairs of skills frequently get conflated; keep them distinct. `jmcb-identification` owns the *causal/structural argument* (is the shock clean, is it supply not demand), while `jmcb-empirical-design` owns the *data the argument runs on* (construction, measurement, sample) — fix identification logic first, then harden the data, then stress both in `jmcb-robustness`. `jmcb-referee-strategy` is *anticipatory* (war-game objections before submission), while `jmcb-rebuttal` is *reactive* (respond to a report that arrived). `jmcb-tables-figures` and `jmcb-internet-appendix` both touch exhibits, but the first is about making the core exhibits legible and the second about what to offload — run them together near the end, after the evidence is final. ## Minimal decision snippet ``` if decision_letter_arrived: -> jmcb-rebuttal elif anticipating_objections: -> jmcb-referee-strategy elif ready_to_submit: -> jmcb-submission elif appendix_thin_or_overloaded: -> jmcb-internet-appendix elif exhibits_unclear: -> jmcb-tables-figures elif results_fragile: -> jmcb-robustness elif data_or_measurement_weak: -> jmcb-empirical-design elif identification_shaky: -> jmcb-identification elif contribution_fuzzy: -> jmcb-literature-positioning else: -> jmcb-topic-selection ```