--- name: jue-robustness description: Use when a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript's headline spatial estimate must be shown to survive specification, spatial-scale, sorting, spillover, and inference choices before submission or in an R&R. Builds the spatially-aware robustness suite a JUE referee expects; it does not establish the identification (jue-identification) or format the maps (jue-tables-figures). --- # Spatial Robustness Suite (jue-robustness) ## When to trigger - The main spatial estimate is in hand and must be shown not to be an artifact of one specification - A referee asks "is this robust to the spatial scale / the buffer / the geography you chose?" - The result depends on a bandwidth, a ring radius, a fixed-effects geography, or a clustering choice - You need to rule out that **spatial sorting** or **MAUP** (modifiable areal unit problem) drives the result - The estimate could move under a spatial-spillover or boundary-definition change ## The JUE robustness bar JUE referees probe whether the spatial estimate is **stable across the spatial choices the researcher made** — the scale of the units, the boundaries, the buffer/ring radii, the fixed-effects geography — and whether inference accounts for spatial dependence. Robustness here is not a wall of regressions; it is a **targeted set of checks, each tied to a spatial threat**, reported so the reader sees the point estimate barely moves. | Spatial threat to the result | The check that answers it | |------------------------------|---------------------------| | Modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) | re-estimate at multiple spatial scales (tract / block-group / zip); show the estimate is scale-stable | | Boundary/buffer arbitrariness | vary ring radii and donut widths; show insensitivity to the cut | | Spatial sorting / selection | balance on pre-period composition; control for or model sorting; placebo on pre-trends | | Spillovers / SUTVA | estimate the spillover ring; show controls outside the spillover zone give the same answer | | Spatial autocorrelation in inference | Conley SEs across distance cutoffs; spatial cluster vs naive | | Geographic confounders | add finer geographic fixed effects (commuting zone, grid cell) and show stability | | Omitted local trends | region-specific linear trends; pre-trend leads flat | | Specification search | a specification curve over scale × FE × bandwidth; declare the primary spec | ## Robustness craft 1. **Lock the primary spatial specification first** — the scale, FE geography, and bandwidth you prefer — then perturb around it. Do not present five co-equal spatial specs. 2. **One spatial threat → one check.** Each robustness exhibit reads "here is the worry (MAUP / spillover / sorting / spatial SEs), here is the evidence it is not the story." 3. **Show stability of the point estimate**, not just that significance survives — across scales, radii, and FE geographies the coefficient should barely move. 4. **Stress-test inference for spatial dependence.** Report Conley SEs at several distance cutoffs; wrong (non-spatial) SEs are the most common JUE robustness failure. 5. **Report honestly where it weakens.** A check that shifts the estimate is information — bound the implication rather than hiding the specification. ## Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP) Run the battery, don't just enumerate it. Full map: [`execution-with-mcp`](../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/execution-with-mcp.md). JUE is urban/spatial economics — sorting and spatial dependence; identification + Conley/spatial-robust inference. - **Many outcomes / specifications:** `romano_wolf` (step-down FWER) or `benjamini_hochberg`. - **OVB sensitivity:** `oster_delta` / `sensemakr`. - **Inference:** `wild_cluster_bootstrap` (few clusters), `twoway_cluster` / `conley`. - **Re-fit off one handle:** `audit_result(result_id)` lists missing checks + the exact `suggest_function` for each. - **Exhibits:** `etable` / `did_summary_to_latex` from the handle — no retyped numbers. Decisive checks in the body, exhaustive battery in the appendix. [JF execution walkthrough](../../../Journal-of-Finance-Skills/resources/worked-examples/02-execution-walkthrough.md). ## Checklist - [ ] Primary spatial spec declared (scale, FE geography, bandwidth) before perturbations - [ ] MAUP addressed: estimate stable across at least two spatial scales - [ ] Boundary/ring choices varied; result insensitive to radius and donut width - [ ] Sorting/selection check (pre-period balance / placebo pre-trends) - [ ] Spillover ring estimated; controls outside the spillover zone give the same answer - [ ] Conley/spatial-cluster SEs reported across distance cutoffs, vs naive - [ ] Finer geographic FE / local trends show the point estimate barely moves - [ ] A spatial placebo (fake boundary / pre-period / unaffected outcome) is shown to be null - [ ] For a QSM, counterfactual sensitivity to the least-identified elasticity is reported - [ ] Any check that moves the estimate is reported and bounded honestly ## Anti-patterns - A 20-column robustness table with no map from check to *spatial* threat (kitchen-sink robustness) - Reporting one spatial scale only, leaving MAUP unaddressed - Naive standard errors on geographically clustered data, then claiming robustness - Hand-picking the ring radius or bandwidth that maximizes significance - Reporting that significance survives while the point estimate wanders across scales - Hiding the FE geography or boundary definition that breaks the result ## Referee pushback mapped to the robustness fix - *"This is an artifact of your spatial scale."* → Re-estimate at tract / block-group / commuting-zone; show the coefficient is scale-stable (MAUP not driving it). - *"Your boundary/ring radius is arbitrary."* → Vary radii and donut widths; show insensitivity across the grid of cuts. - *"Did you cluster for spatial dependence?"* → Conley SEs at several distance cutoffs (and a spatial-cluster alternative), contrasted with naive SEs. - *"This is specification search."* → Declare the primary spatial spec; show a specification curve over scale × FE × bandwidth in which the point estimate barely moves. ## Robustness for a structural / QSM paper When the JUE paper is a quantitative spatial model, robustness shifts from specification perturbations to **parameter sensitivity and counterfactual stability**. Report how the headline counterfactual moves as the least-identified elasticities (migration, commuting, agglomeration) are varied across plausible ranges from the literature; show that the qualitative conclusion and the order of magnitude survive. A counterfactual that is fragile to one elasticity is a finding to bound and disclose, not to bury — the same honesty norm as reduced-form stability. ## Worked vignette (illustrative) A density-wage elasticity is 0.045 (Conley s.e. 0.012). The spatial robustness suite: (i) re-estimated at tract, block-group, and commuting-zone scale, the elasticity stays in [0.041, 0.049] — MAUP is not driving it; (ii) Conley SEs at 50/100/200 km cutoffs keep the CI away from zero; (iii) adding commuting-zone fixed effects moves it to 0.043; (iv) a placebo on pre-period wage growth is flat, arguing against sorting on trends; (v) the spillover specification shows neighboring-area contamination is small. The point estimate barely moves — the JUE target. ## Spatial placebo and falsification Beyond perturbing the main spec, the most persuasive JUE robustness evidence is a placebo that *should* show nothing and does. Useful spatial placebos: assign the treatment to a pre-period and show no effect (rules out pre-trends/sorting on trends); apply the design to an outcome that the mechanism should not move (rules out a generic local shock); shift the boundary or corridor to a fake location and show the discontinuity vanishes. A clean placebo is often worth more to a referee than another robustness column, because it tests the design rather than re-running it — and a placebo that unexpectedly *does* fire is critical information to report, not suppress. ## Output format ```text 【Primary spatial spec】scale / FE geography / bandwidth — estimate: ___ (Conley s.e. ___) 【MAUP】scales tested: ___ ; range: [___, ___] 【Boundary/ring】radii/donut varied? result stable? [Y/N] 【Sorting check】pre-period balance / placebo pre-trend: ___ 【Spillover】ring estimated; controls-outside-zone consistent? [Y/N] 【Spatial inference】Conley cutoffs: ___ ; vs naive: ___ 【Estimate stability】range across checks: [___, ___]; checks that move it: ___ 【Next skill】jue-tables-figures ```