` derived from the task file), commit. One sub-task = one commit. A batch of 3 parallel sub-tasks produces 3 commits. 4. After the full batch — synthesize learnings, check off the batch in the task file, run **Layer 5 quality gates** (lint / typecheck / tests on affected files) per [quality-gates.md](../hyperflow/quality-gates.md). If gates fix anything, those become small additional commits on top (never amend per-sub-task commits). If `chain-mode=manual`, pause and ask before starting the next batch. ### Step 3 — Final Integration Review Mandatory and **separate from batch reviews**. Dispatch a thinking-tier reviewer with the full set of changed files. Print `**Reviewer** — final integration review (L1–L<n>)` using the same level cap as the batch reviewers (per flow profile). Verdict required — `PASS` / `NEEDS_FIX` / `SECURITY_VIOLATION`. ### Step 4 — Wrap Up Agents — `Writer` (Sonnet) ⇒ **Reviewer** (Opus). 1. Dispatch `Writer — finalizing dispatch artifacts` to: - Delete the completed task file from `.hyperflow/tasks/`. - Append durable patterns/decisions to `.hyperflow/memory/` per [memory-system.md](../hyperflow/memory-system.md). - Commit the memory + task-file-deletion as a `chore(memory):` commit (this is a *separate* commit from the per-sub-task commits from Step 2 — keeping memory writes out of feature commits keeps the diff clean). 2. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — verifying wrap-up` to confirm: memory entries are non-duplicate, commit messages match the changes, no half-written artifacts remain in `.hyperflow/`, per-sub-task commit cadence was respected (one commit per approved sub-task). 3. Print the usage summary per [output-style.md](../hyperflow/output-style.md). ### Step 5 — End of Auto-Chain · Audit + Deploy gates Dispatch is the endpoint of the auto-chain. Two **separate** `AskUserQuestion` gates fire here (DOCTRINE rule 8 — structural gates always fire, never silently default): **Gate 1 — Run `/hyperflow:audit`?** ``` ? Run /hyperflow:audit on the cumulative diff? Yes (Recommended) — outside-eye L3 review, independent of per-batch reviewers No — skip; per-batch L1–L<n> reviews were enough ``` Recommended option scales with the triage's flow profile: - `fast` / `standard` profile → `No (Recommended)` — per-batch L1–L2 reviewers already covered it - `deep` / `scientific` profile → `Yes (Recommended)` — L3 outside review is worth it on cross-cutting changes - `creative` → `Yes (Recommended)` if the change touches user-visible surfaces On `Yes` → invoke `Skill` with `skill: audit` and `args: "level=3"` (or `level=5` for scientific). Wait for it to finish. Then proceed to Gate 2. **Gate 2 — Run `/hyperflow:deploy`?** ``` ? Run /hyperflow:deploy now? (lint + typecheck + build + tests + security sweep, then asks before push) Yes (Recommended) — green-light path: all dispatch gates passed, ready to ship No — keep the per-sub-task commits local; you'll push manually later ``` Recommended option toggles based on dispatch gate state: - All Step 4 gates were green AND no escalations occurred → `Yes (Recommended)` - Any gate fix required ≥2 retries, or an escalation triggered → `No (Recommended)` — let the user eyeball the diff first On `Yes` → invoke `Skill` with `skill: deploy`. Deploy has its own push-confirmation gate at its Step 6. On `No` to both gates → stop cleanly. Print one line: ``` Dispatch complete — <n> batches, <m> agents, <p> per-sub-task commits on branch <branch>. Next: invoke /hyperflow:audit or /hyperflow:deploy manually when ready. ``` The orchestrator does **NOT** auto-invoke audit or deploy. Both gates wait for an explicit user choice. Defaulting silently is a doctrine violation. ## Agent Label Style No icons, no brackets. Em-dash separator. Bold for thinking-tier roles: ``` Implementer — creating auth middleware Searcher — finding related test files Writer — generating API documentation **Reviewer** — reviewing auth middleware output **Debugger** — investigating test failure in auth.test.ts ``` ## Iron Rules - Workers never review, never coordinate, never ask the user questions. - Every batch produces **one** thinking-tier batch reviewer dispatch. - Plus **one** thinking-tier final integration review at the end. - Plus **one** thinking-tier wrap-up reviewer at Step 4 (DOCTRINE rule 12). - Therefore — `thinking agents in usage summary >= batches + 2`. If less, a per-step reviewer was skipped. The task was done wrong. ## Doctrine Full rules in [DOCTRINE.md](../hyperflow/DOCTRINE.md). This skill is the execute phase invoked at the end of `/hyperflow:scope`.

--- name: dispatch description: Use when a task file exists in `.hyperflow/tasks/` and workers need dispatching — `/hyperflow:dispatch`, "run the plan", "execute the task", "build it". Dispatches parallel workers, runs thinking-tier batch reviews, finishes with a final integration review. Endpoint of the auto-chain (no auto-deploy — user opts in to push). --- # Dispatch Workhorse phase. Picks up a task file from `/hyperflow:scope` and runs it through the orchestrator pattern with parallel worker dispatch and thinking-tier reviews. This skill exercises **Layer 3 (Orchestrator)**, **Layer 5 (Quality Gates)**, **Layer 6 (Project Memory)**, **Layer 8 (Git Workflow)**, and **Layer 9 (Security)** from the doctrine. Multi-level review (L1–L5) is applied per the triage's flow profile. ## Per-Step Agent Map (DOCTRINE rule 12) Every substantive step dispatches at least one Agent. | Step | Worker tier | Thinking tier | Notes | |---|---|---|---| | 0 — Mode confirm | — | — | `AskUserQuestion` only (exempt) | | 1 — Load task | — | — | File read only (exempt) | | 2 — Per batch | Implementer / Searcher / Writer × N parallel (Sonnet) | **Reviewer** (Opus) per sub-task at L1–L | Both tiers · per sub-task | | 2b — Quality gates | Worker (Sonnet) runs lint/typecheck/tests | **Reviewer** (Opus) judges gate output | Both tiers | | 3 — Final integration | — | **Reviewer** (Opus) L1–L over full diff | Mandatory | | 4 — Wrap up | Writer (Sonnet) deletes task, appends memory, auto-commits | **Reviewer** (Opus) sanity-checks the commit + memory entries | Both tiers | | 5 — End of chain | — | — | Two `AskUserQuestion` gates: audit? deploy? (exempt — gates only) | Iron rule — `thinking agents ≥ batches + 1` (per-batch reviewer + final integration). With per-step thinking-tier reviewers in Step 4, the floor rises to `batches + 2`. ## Review Levels (scale by flow profile) Every batch reviewer and the final integration reviewer uses the level set below. Profile comes from `/hyperflow:spec` triage and is propagated via the `chain-mode` args. | Profile | Levels | Workers | Reviewers | |---|---|---|---| | `fast` | L1 | 1 | inline self-review only | | `standard` | L1–L2 | 1–2 | 1 per-batch reviewer | | `deep` | L1–L5 | 3+ | per-batch + final integration | | `research` | L1–L2 + synthesis | 3+ searchers | inline synthesis | | `creative` | L1–L3 + UX | 1–2 | 1 reviewer | | `scientific` | L1–L5 + TDD | 2–3 | per-batch + final | L1 syntax/format · L2 spec/naming/edges · L3 integration/security · L4 perf/scale · L5 a11y/UX. See [review-levels.md](../hyperflow/review-levels.md) for the full checklist. ## Approval Gates | Gate | When | Format | |---|---|---| | Chain mode | Step 0, only if invoked directly | `AskUserQuestion` — auto / manual | | Inter-batch (manual mode only) | After each batch's gates pass | `AskUserQuestion` — continue / stop | | Hard halt | Any `SECURITY_VIOLATION` from a reviewer | Stop the chain, surface the finding | | **Audit prompt** | Step 5, after wrap-up | `AskUserQuestion` — run `/hyperflow:audit`? (yes/no, recommended toggles with flow profile) | | **Deploy prompt** | Step 5, after audit gate | `AskUserQuestion` — run `/hyperflow:deploy`? (yes/no, recommended toggles with gate state) | ## Inputs - **Task file** — positional arg (slug or path). Default — most-recently-modified file in `.hyperflow/tasks/`. - **`chain-mode=`** — passed in by `/hyperflow:scope`. Controls whether to pause for confirmation after the final integration review. If absent, assume `auto`. - **`--from-batch `** — resume from a specific batch (skip prior batches). - **`--final-only`** — skip batch dispatch, run only the final integration review. ## Flow ### Step 0 — Choose mode (only if invoked directly · STRUCTURAL GATE) This is a **structural gate** per DOCTRINE rule 8. When dispatch is invoked directly (no `chain-mode` arg from `scope`), it MUST fire. "No clarifying questions" / "auto-pilot" / any autonomy directive does NOT skip it. Defaulting silently is a doctrine violation. If a `chain-mode` arg was passed, skip this step — the chain-starter already asked. Otherwise, ask via `AskUserQuestion`. Per DOCTRINE rule 8, the recommended option goes first with `(Recommended)`: ``` How should I handle progress through the batches? Auto (Recommended) — run all batches + final review and stop. Print next-step suggestions. Manual — pause between batches and ask before continuing. ``` Wait for the user's answer. Do not proceed without it. If `AskUserQuestion` cannot be presented, print an error and stop — never silently default. ### Step 1 — Load the task Read `.hyperflow/tasks/.md`. If absent, stop and suggest `/hyperflow:scope` first. ### Step 2 — For each batch 1. Print the batch header: `Batch — `. 2. Dispatch all sub-tasks in the batch in a **single message** with parallel `Agent` calls (one per sub-task). Use the [worker-prompt.md](../hyperflow/worker-prompt.md) template. Inject `Project Context` (from `.hyperflow/profile.md`, `architecture.md`, `conventions.md`) plus accumulated `Learnings from prior batches`. 3. As each worker returns: - Print `Implementer — completed ` (or relevant role). - Immediately dispatch a thinking-tier reviewer per [reviewer-prompt.md](../hyperflow/reviewer-prompt.md). Print `**Reviewer** — reviewing (L1–L)` where `n` is set by the flow-profile table above. - If verdict is `NEEDS_FIX` — re-dispatch worker with the fix list. Repeat until `PASS` (max 3 retries before escalating to a thinking-tier worker). - If verdict is `SECURITY_VIOLATION` — **halt the chain** immediately and surface the finding to the user (no auto-continue). - On `PASS` — **commit this sub-task immediately** per [git-workflow.md](../hyperflow/git-workflow.md) rule 2 (per-sub-task commit cadence). Stage only the files this sub-task touched, write a conventional commit (`feat(): ` derived from the task file), commit. One sub-task = one commit. A batch of 3 parallel sub-tasks produces 3 commits. 4. After the full batch — synthesize learnings, check off the batch in the task file, run **Layer 5 quality gates** (lint / typecheck / tests on affected files) per [quality-gates.md](../hyperflow/quality-gates.md). If gates fix anything, those become small additional commits on top (never amend per-sub-task commits). If `chain-mode=manual`, pause and ask before starting the next batch. ### Step 3 — Final Integration Review Mandatory and **separate from batch reviews**. Dispatch a thinking-tier reviewer with the full set of changed files. Print `**Reviewer** — final integration review (L1–L<n>)` using the same level cap as the batch reviewers (per flow profile). Verdict required — `PASS` / `NEEDS_FIX` / `SECURITY_VIOLATION`. ### Step 4 — Wrap Up Agents — `Writer` (Sonnet) ⇒ **Reviewer** (Opus). 1. Dispatch `Writer — finalizing dispatch artifacts` to: - Delete the completed task file from `.hyperflow/tasks/`. - Append durable patterns/decisions to `.hyperflow/memory/` per [memory-system.md](../hyperflow/memory-system.md). - Commit the memory + task-file-deletion as a `chore(memory):` commit (this is a *separate* commit from the per-sub-task commits from Step 2 — keeping memory writes out of feature commits keeps the diff clean). 2. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — verifying wrap-up` to confirm: memory entries are non-duplicate, commit messages match the changes, no half-written artifacts remain in `.hyperflow/`, per-sub-task commit cadence was respected (one commit per approved sub-task). 3. Print the usage summary per [output-style.md](../hyperflow/output-style.md). ### Step 5 — End of Auto-Chain · Audit + Deploy gates Dispatch is the endpoint of the auto-chain. Two **separate** `AskUserQuestion` gates fire here (DOCTRINE rule 8 — structural gates always fire, never silently default): **Gate 1 — Run `/hyperflow:audit`?** ``` ? Run /hyperflow:audit on the cumulative diff? Yes (Recommended) — outside-eye L3 review, independent of per-batch reviewers No — skip; per-batch L1–L<n> reviews were enough ``` Recommended option scales with the triage's flow profile: - `fast` / `standard` profile → `No (Recommended)` — per-batch L1–L2 reviewers already covered it - `deep` / `scientific` profile → `Yes (Recommended)` — L3 outside review is worth it on cross-cutting changes - `creative` → `Yes (Recommended)` if the change touches user-visible surfaces On `Yes` → invoke `Skill` with `skill: audit` and `args: "level=3"` (or `level=5` for scientific). Wait for it to finish. Then proceed to Gate 2. **Gate 2 — Run `/hyperflow:deploy`?** ``` ? Run /hyperflow:deploy now? (lint + typecheck + build + tests + security sweep, then asks before push) Yes (Recommended) — green-light path: all dispatch gates passed, ready to ship No — keep the per-sub-task commits local; you'll push manually later ``` Recommended option toggles based on dispatch gate state: - All Step 4 gates were green AND no escalations occurred → `Yes (Recommended)` - Any gate fix required ≥2 retries, or an escalation triggered → `No (Recommended)` — let the user eyeball the diff first On `Yes` → invoke `Skill` with `skill: deploy`. Deploy has its own push-confirmation gate at its Step 6. On `No` to both gates → stop cleanly. Print one line: ``` Dispatch complete — <n> batches, <m> agents, <p> per-sub-task commits on branch <branch>. Next: invoke /hyperflow:audit or /hyperflow:deploy manually when ready. ``` The orchestrator does **NOT** auto-invoke audit or deploy. Both gates wait for an explicit user choice. Defaulting silently is a doctrine violation. ## Agent Label Style No icons, no brackets. Em-dash separator. Bold for thinking-tier roles: ``` Implementer — creating auth middleware Searcher — finding related test files Writer — generating API documentation **Reviewer** — reviewing auth middleware output **Debugger** — investigating test failure in auth.test.ts ``` ## Iron Rules - Workers never review, never coordinate, never ask the user questions. - Every batch produces **one** thinking-tier batch reviewer dispatch. - Plus **one** thinking-tier final integration review at the end. - Plus **one** thinking-tier wrap-up reviewer at Step 4 (DOCTRINE rule 12). - Therefore — `thinking agents in usage summary >= batches + 2`. If less, a per-step reviewer was skipped. The task was done wrong. ## Doctrine Full rules in [DOCTRINE.md](../hyperflow/DOCTRINE.md). This skill is the execute phase invoked at the end of `/hyperflow:scope`.