--- name: debugging-dags description: Comprehensive DAG failure diagnosis and root-cause analysis with structured investigation and prevention recommendations. Use when deep failure investigation is needed, a DAG fails to import/parse or 'airflow dags list' errors on a file; a task or run is failing and must be diagnosed and fixed; requests like 'why did X fail', 'my dag keeps failing — find and fix it', or fixing a broken DAG so it loads cleanly. For simple 'why did it fail / show logs', the airflow skill handles it directly. --- # DAG Diagnosis You are a data engineer debugging a failed Airflow DAG. Follow this systematic approach to identify the root cause and provide actionable remediation. ## Running the CLI These commands assume `af` is on PATH. Run via `astro otto` to get it automatically, or install standalone with `uv tool install astro-airflow-mcp`. --- ## Step 1: Identify the Failure If a specific DAG was mentioned: - Run `af runs diagnose ` (if run_id is provided) - If no run_id specified, run `af dags stats` to find recent failures If no DAG was specified: - Run `af health` to find recent failures across all DAGs - Check for import errors with `af dags errors` - Show DAGs with recent failures - Ask which DAG to investigate further ## Step 2: Get the Error Details Once you have identified a failed task: 1. **Get task logs** using `af tasks logs ` 2. **Look for the actual exception** - scroll past the Airflow boilerplate to find the real error 3. **Categorize the failure type**: - **Data issue**: Missing data, schema change, null values, constraint violation - **Code issue**: Bug, syntax error, import failure, type error - **Infrastructure issue**: Connection timeout, resource exhaustion, permission denied - **Dependency issue**: Upstream failure, external API down, rate limiting ## Step 3: Check Context Gather additional context to understand WHY this happened: 1. **Recent changes**: Was there a code deploy? Check git history if available 2. **Package version changes**: Was a package upgraded — in the image, in a venv-style operator, or at the index? See [Package version changes](#package-version-changes) below. 3. **Data volume**: Did data volume spike? Run a quick count on source tables 4. **Upstream health**: Did upstream tasks succeed but produce unexpected data? 5. **Historical pattern**: Is this a recurring failure? Check if same task failed before 6. **Timing**: Did this fail at an unusual time? (resource contention, maintenance windows) Use `af runs get ` to compare the failed run against recent successful runs. ### Package version changes A common cause of failures with no git activity is dependency drift — the user's code didn't change, but a package they depend on did. Check in this order: 1. **Worker image diff** (preferred when available). Every Astro deploy = new image tag, so the registry has a "before" and "after". Diff `pip freeze` between current and previous image — that's ground truth for what changed: ``` docker run --rm pip freeze > /tmp/now.txt docker run --rm pip freeze > /tmp/prev.txt diff /tmp/prev.txt /tmp/now.txt ``` Also compare `docker run --rm python --version` between the two — a Python minor-version bump (3.11 → 3.12, or even a patch) can break wheel compatibility even when `pip freeze` looks identical. `af config providers` lists currently installed provider versions, useful for cross-checking against modules named in the traceback. 2. **Venv-style operators bypass the worker image.** `@task.virtualenv`, `PythonVirtualenvOperator`, `ExternalPythonOperator`, and `KubernetesPodOperator` build their environment per task run, so an image diff won't catch failures inside them. If the failed task is one of these, read its `requirements` / `image` / `python_version` / `python` args directly: - Unbounded specifier (e.g. `pandas>=2.0.0` with no upper bound, or no specifier at all) → a new upstream release is the prime suspect. - `image="foo:latest"` or no tag → the image moved underneath you. - `python_version="3.11"` (on `@task.virtualenv` / `PythonVirtualenvOperator`) or a `python` path (on `ExternalPythonOperator`) resolving to a different interpreter than it used to — a Python minor-version change can break wheel compatibility for unchanged `requirements`. Same vector applies to the worker image itself if the base Python changed there. Fix is to pin: `pandas>=2.0.0,<3.0.0`, a lockfile, a specific image SHA, or a fully-qualified Python version (`python_version="3.11.7"` instead of `"3.11"`). 3. **Index lookup** when image diff isn't conclusive (no image history, or a venv-style operator). Identify the configured index first — it may not be PyPI: - Env vars: `UV_INDEX_URL`, `PIP_INDEX_URL`, `PIP_EXTRA_INDEX_URL` - `pyproject.toml` → `[[tool.uv.index]]` - `~/.pip/pip.conf`, `/etc/pip.conf` - `Dockerfile` `--index-url` flags Then query for releases of the suspect package since the first failure started. PyPI: ``` curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi//json | jq '.releases | to_entries | map({version: .key, uploaded: .value[0].upload_time}) | sort_by(.uploaded) | reverse | .[:5]' ``` Private indexes usually expose the same `/pypi//json` shape; fall back to the Simple API (`/simple//`) or ask the user if neither works. A release timestamp landing between the last green run and the first red run, for a package named in the traceback, is the answer. ### On Astro If you're running on Astro, these additional tools can help with diagnosis: - **Deployment activity log**: Check the Astro UI for recent deploys — a failed deploy or recent code change is often the cause of sudden failures - **Astro alerts**: Configure alerts in the Astro UI for proactive failure monitoring (DAG failure, task duration, SLA miss) - **Observability**: Use the Astro [observability dashboard](https://www.astronomer.io/docs/astro/airflow-alerts) to track DAG health trends and spot recurring issues ### On OSS Airflow - **Airflow UI**: Use the DAGs page, Graph view, and task logs to inspect recent runs and failures ## Step 4: Provide Actionable Output Structure your diagnosis as: ### Root Cause What actually broke? Be specific - not "the task failed" but "the task failed because column X was null in 15% of rows when the code expected 0%". ### Impact Assessment - What data is affected? Which tables didn't get updated? - What downstream processes are blocked? - Is this blocking production dashboards or reports? ### Immediate Fix Specific steps to resolve RIGHT NOW: 1. If it's a data issue: SQL to fix or skip bad records 2. If it's a code issue: The exact code change needed 3. If it's infra: Who to contact or what to restart ### Prevention How to prevent this from happening again: - Add data quality checks? - Add better error handling? - Add alerting for edge cases? - Update documentation? - Pin dependencies (constraints file, lockfile, or upper-bound specifiers on venv/external/pod operators) to avoid silent upstream drift? ### Quick Commands Provide ready-to-use commands: - To clear and rerun the entire DAG run: `af runs clear ` - To clear and rerun specific failed tasks: `af tasks clear -D` - To delete a stuck or unwanted run: `af runs delete `