sOME ELSE BROUGHT THIS UP LOOK UP THE DEFINITIN OF INVURNABILITY, AND I
DONT REMEMBER ANYONE EVER SAYING IT KEEEPS YOU FROM GETTIGN HIT IT KEEPS YOU
FRONM TAKING DAMAGE AND SINCE STUN DEALS NO DAMAGE IT ALL MAKES SINCE:)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mikaela <mikaela1@...>
To: EQ-Clerics@onelist.com <EQ-Clerics@onelist.com>
Date: Sunday, September 05, 1999 12:54 PM
Subject: [EQ-Clerics] Stun Issue & Interview with Geoffrey Zatkin

>From: "Mikaela" <mikaela1@...>
>
>Sorry, can't agree with you on the stun issue either. Doesn't make ANY
>sense to me, much less total as it does to you. If you have been given the
>ability by the gods to put a "divine" shield around yourself and make
>yourself invulnerable from being hit, then you shouldn't be able to be
>stunned because the critter MUST hit you to stun you. Quite simply, you
>can't get stunned if you can't get hit. Now, if they would've said Divine
>Aura is strictly a spell to prevent you from taking any DAMAGE from a hit
>but not to prevent you from BEING hit, then that is different.
>
> But in my opinion, if we have the ability to cloak ourselves from damage,
>it should include ALL damage, including stuns. Because stun to me IS a

form

>of damage even though it does not reduce your hps. It renders you

incapable

>of moving, which to me, is STILL a type of damage. Just like the blinding
>light spell.....its effects, aka damage, aren't reflected in loss of hps

but

>it DOES damage to you by rendering you incapable of seeing.
>
>Mik
>
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> Free Games & Cash Prizes!
>Gamesville - The World's Biggest & Best Game Show Site!
> http://www.onelist.com/ad/gamesville0
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>