> we are poor cuz not only do we pay for armors, we pay for spells. and the
> reagents to use them. So therefore we are poor saps ;) (Bloodstones for
> instance for Rylatan are a mere 7gp - 1pp depending on faction/charm :)

If you want to save some money go to Lavastorm and auction to buy
them. When people sell them they only get 2-3 gold and yo could offer 4 and
save some money. Almost everything lavastorm drops gems, and the most common
is bloodstone.

Richard

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rose [mailto:rliu@...]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 2:31 PM
> To: EQ-Clerics@onelist.com
> Subject: RE: [EQ-Clerics] Trade skills (was: Smithing (was: Dress Up
> Wear) )
>
>
> From: "Rose" <rliu@...>
>
> > A question:
> > Despite clerics traditionally being a poor class, I suspect that many
> > clerics do one or more trade skills... Anyone? My favourite is baking
> > because you can cook on the move.
> >
> > Elbeno
> >
>
> I have a question of my own, why is the cleric traditionally a poor class
> (fund wise)? Is it due to the fact that we med so much that we forget to
> loot? I have been hunting with the same group of ppl since lvl 15 and we
> are all pretty fair about loot. However, the other day we took in a dwarf
> paladin, and my gosh, he was a greedy little bastard. Looted everything in
> sight. However, when hunting with my group, I usually get a good
> split...it's the monk who I feel sorry for...he can never carry anything so
> he doesnt loot...but he is the richest one amongst us...=/
>
> Anyway, I was thinking of starting pottery or maybe brewing. Brewing would
> guarantee me an in on any party and pottery, will, just seems unusual enough
> to do. Too bad we can't have alchemy or that would have been my first
> choice.
>
> -Imogen
>
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> ONElist: your connection to online communities.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

[text/html is unsupported, treating like TEXT/PLAIN]

> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2448.0">
> <TITLE>RE: [EQ-Clerics] Trade skills (was: Smithing (was: Dress Up Wear) )</TITLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY>
>
> we are poor cuz not only do we pay for armors, we pay for spells. and the reagents to use them. So therefore we are poor saps ;) (Bloodstones for instance for Rylatan are a mere 7gp - 1pp depending on faction/charm :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rose [<A HREF="mailto:rliu@...">mailto:rliu@...</A>]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 2:31 PM
> To: EQ-Clerics@onelist.com
> Subject: RE: [EQ-Clerics] Trade skills (was: Smithing (was: Dress Up
> Wear) )
> 
> 
>
> From: "Rose" <rliu@...>
> 
>
> > A question:
> > Despite clerics traditionally being a poor class, I suspect that many
> > clerics do one or more trade skills... Anyone? My favourite is baking
> > because you can cook on the move.
> >
> > Elbeno
> >
> 
>
> I have a question of my own, why is the cleric traditionally a poor class
> (fund wise)? Is it due to the fact that we med so much that we forget to
> loot? I have been hunting with the same group of ppl since lvl 15 and we
> are all pretty fair about loot. However, the other day we took in a dwarf
> paladin, and my gosh, he was a greedy little bastard. Looted everything in
> sight. However, when hunting with my group, I usually get a good
> split...it's the monk who I feel sorry for...he can never carry anything so
> he doesnt loot...but he is the richest one amongst us...=/
> 
>
> Anyway, I was thinking of starting pottery or maybe brewing. Brewing would
> guarantee me an in on any party and pottery, will, just seems unusual enough
> to do. Too bad we can't have alchemy or that would have been my first
> choice.
> 
>
> -Imogen
> 
> 
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
> 
>
> ONElist: your connection to online communities.
> 
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>
> </BODY>
> </HTML>