[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1271
Date: Sun Sep 12 15:08:13 BST 1999
Author: Ralph
Subject: RE: Yield Policy
> From: "Mikaela" <mikaela1@...>think
>
> I'll tell you what my whole opinion is on this camping/yield issue. I
> theis able
> first group there stays there, regardless of their level. And noone
> to throwwas
> another group out if that group was there first.
>
> I have wanted a nightshade wreath and gem sceptre for ages. So today,
> myself and 5 other level 50s went to camp MM castle. Everything there
> green to us, but myself and a level 50 shaman friend wanted wreathsand
> sceptres, which we didn't have. Under Brad's rule, if a group ofyield
> level 35+ comes, and they can get exp for that area, then we have to
> and give up a spot we have been at for hours. Tell me where thefairness in
> THATI was
> rule is.
>
> Since there are very few places I can get exp anymore and have maxxed
> out level 50, I am going around and getting items I don't have because
> focusing on exp and helping others level as well. I plan to do thePaw of
> Opallo quest next. Mitty is green to me, as is Gynok Moltar. ShouldI have
> to leave camping them just because lower levels come to camp for thesame
> items Idoesn't
> want? I think that is totally unfair. Just because I am level 50
> mean I"m notexp
> entitled to get items I don't have just because the mobs don't give me
> anymore.leave, the
>
> Again, my opinion is....first there stays there. Then when they
> next group in line gets the camp spot. I don't think levels shouldhave
> anything to do with who gets the camp spot. I don't think high levelslower
> should force lower levels away from a camp spot, and I don't think
> levels should be able to force higher levels away if they were therefirst.
> To do it any other way discriminates against one group over another(higher
> vs. lower).been
>
> And I'll tell you this....if a GM tells me to leave a camp spot I have
> atthen
> for hours for an item I don't have that I want just because some lower
> levels arrived and want my spot, then I won't be playing EQ for very
> much longer.
>
> The only fair way IMO is first there stays there, regardless of level,
> whomever was next gets it next, and so on and so on. Get in line andtake a
> number. No one group of players should be favored over another.item
>
> To do it Brad's way, would mean that any player that didn't get an
> while he/she wasthat item
> able to get exp from that particular mob could basically never get
> cause they could beis
> thrown out of the camp spot everytime lower levels came along. This
> totally not fair.form)
>
> Mik (who abhors discrimination or favoritism in any way, shape or
>heard of
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Erik Maynus <jmaynus@...>
> To: EQ-Clerics@onelist.com <EQ-Clerics@onelist.com>
> Date: Saturday, September 11, 1999 11:41 PM
> Subject: [EQ-Clerics] Yield Policy
>
> >From: "John Erik Maynus" <jmaynus@...>
> >
> >What does everyone think of this Yield Policy? In case you never
> >it, it Brads new way of getting rid of high lvl characters campinglower
> lvlcamping a
> >spawn points.
> >This is what he said but it
> >
> >"If a higher level player who would get no exp for the kill is
> >spawn, and a group of players that would get exp (meaning they shouldbe
> >there) wants to fight there, the higher level player must yield. Thelower
> >level group has the right of way.like the
> >
> >As for the other disciplinary information in that post, it sounds
> >same policy that's always been in place: if you are warned severaltimes
> andI'm not
> >continue to break the rules, you will be banned."
> >
> >Do you all think this will work or just tick off a lot of players?
> >sure if I'm for it or not, but also remember if your a camper doingthis
> andreally
> >you're warned a few times you'll be banned from the game. I don't
> >camp, I do in a few spots but not a lot but only in places that giveme
> exp.announced.
> >He said it wouldn't be actively enforced till it was officially
> >Some ppl are wanting us to be able to vote yes or no on it but as ofnow
> >Brad isn't letting us vote----------------------------
> >
> >**************************
> >Azor
> >Lvl 18 Human Cleric of the Rathe
> >**************************
> >
> >
> >
> >--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
> >-
> >Announcing the ONElist Hawaiian Sweepstakes!
> >Enter to win a trip for two to Hawaii! Click here:
> ><a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/hawaii3 ">Click Here</a>
> >
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Show your ONElist SPIRIT!
> <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/tshirt2 ">Click Here</a>
> With a new ONElist SHIRT available through our website.
>
>