[<a href='1612.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='1610.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='1613.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='1572.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 1611 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Dec 16 20:46:35 GMT 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Cory Burns <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Skill Cap <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1206931716">As far as it goes the person that is 27 with skill of 65 that shows that<br/>
the math of (level-15) *5 is wrong, and if there still is a  cap which I<br/>
hope there isn&#39;t then, the only one that is stated other then the one<br/>
metioned was diabloklr and it was (level *5) - 13 which is the only opther<br/>
one metioned. I think it may be it but I also disagre with the formuala . I<br/>
can think of no other formuala in the game that uses this, and the math does<br/>
seem consistant but we will see. But I agree with Diabloklr on one thing it<br/>
is at least not (level-15) *5. Hey guys this is a thread on Tinkering lets<br/>
figure out what this is and see what we can come up with this. Thanks :)<br/>
<br/>
Fanrick Mage to Brell<br/>
<br/>
-----Original Message-----<br/>
From: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:Diablokilr@...">Diablokilr@...</a> [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:Diablokilr@...">Diablokilr@...</a>]<br/>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 2:25 PM<br/>
To: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:EQ_Tinkering@onelist.com">EQ_Tinkering@onelist.com</a><br/>
Subject: Re: SV: [EQ_Tinkering] Re: Skill Cap<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
From: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:Diablokilr@...">Diablokilr@...</a><br/>
<br/>
The funny thing about this response was that it was meant for the other guy<br/>
who says my formula is incorrect.... according to my formula he had yet to<br/>
reach the limit of his skill so kiss off Thank you.</div>