[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 2201
Date: Fri Jun 23 14:15:57 BST 2000
Author: Cory Burns
Subject: RE: [EQ_Tinkering] Digest Number 289


What about a wizard class. Which all in all would be the strongest class with even a crappy little pet. A wizards biggest problem is keeping the mob occupied while he/she cast a spell. Think about it even if the pet had 200 HP it would take a giant 2 hits to kill it giving the casting times on wizard spells. He could get his root off and then proceed to whip up the giant I am not saying he would still win, but a class that is strong like wizards that do not use pets and would really damn strong if they did, would be something Verant would not ever do.
 
 
 
Fanrick Tinker/Magician of Tarew Marr
-----Original Message-----
From: jcs0001@... [mailto:jcs0001@...]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 6:54 AM
To: EQ_Tinkering@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [EQ_Tinkering] Digest Number 289

They could allways restrict the class  at which certain pets could be aquired. Max out the skillcaps.
 
Warrior - 90
Rogue - 110
Enchanter - 500
 
you get the idea...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Helm [mailto:scarcher@...]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 4:38 PM
To: EQ_Tinkering@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [EQ_Tinkering] Digest Number 289

The only problem with this is Linkdead's. If you are forced to zone against your will due to a problem with the game or the ISP connection, you lose it. Also this still allow pets to classes I am not sure Verant wants to have pets like Warriors and rogues.