[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 2268
Date: Thu Aug 31 20:36:34 BST 2000
Author: Garett
Subject: Re: [EQ_Tinkering] Sigh... Abashi responds...


Aaaahhhhh, lawyerspeak.

----- Original Message -----
From: <gibkeeg@...>
To: <EQ_Tinkering@egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: [EQ_Tinkering] Sigh... Abashi responds...


>
> This is Abashi, he leaves a way out for everything he says or he will not
> say it. So yes, he will use the excuse "after doesn't mean next".
>
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Kimes, Dean W. wrote:
>
> >
> > Whoa, now you are using semantics as an excuse? If I'm a cashier and I
tell
> > you I'll help you after I help this other gentleman, do you really
expect I
> > might not get to you for several weeks? I think not. The general
> > understanding when someone says something will be done after something
else
> > is that there is a sequence involved. 2 comes after 1. No one believes
> > that means 2 comes sometime after 1, but not necessarily next.
> >
> > Leagnomo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe D [mailto:joed@...]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 11:08 AM
> > To: EQ_Tinkering@egroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [EQ_Tinkering] Sigh... Abashi responds...
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:50:45PM -0700, Gazamel Prime wrote:
> > > I started up a thread on the Gameplay boards, and
> > > Abashi actually answered it. He is now saying that
> > > Tinkering was never promised to us after poison, a
> > > 100% contradiction of what Aradune stated earlier this
> > > year.
> >
> > To be fair, he never did say what you attributed to him.
> >
> > You said that he said the tinkering would be done NEXT after poisoning.
> >
> > This is incorrect.
> >
> > All he said was that it would be done after poisoning, not IMMEDIATELY
after
> > poisoning.
> >
> > Be patient. They'll get to it.
> >
> > Pasketti of Povar
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>