[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 362
Date: Tue Aug 17 11:44:53 BST 1999
Author: Martin Pikas
Subject: Re: Combinations for that fishing pole = irrelevant math stuff


> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:59:49 GMT
> From: "Xillitil of Povar" <xillitil@...>
>Subject: Re: Combinations for that fishing pole = irrelevant math stuff
>
>
>yeh, there is probably no practical use for the numbers, but it's been a
>while since my brain got any exercise...and being realistic is no fun :)
>
>realized that i forgot order is not important again...
>current guess is 13^8/8!...~20231
>or 13^4/4!=~1120 for 4 slots used...
>
>hmmm...that seems to be not quite right either...dunno...gonna have to go
>find some old textbooks or something...
>
>
>Xillitil/Povar

I think the way you came up with that formula is good. (It must be, because
it was what I came up with at first, lol)
Problem is it is wrong.

Suppose we have 13 types of items in 100 slots.

That gives us 13^100/100! which is less than 1. (Can't be right.)

The other problem I had with it is that it does not produce an integer
number. What is 0.3 combinations?


I wish this was even worth 2 cp...