Hail Maev! I TOTALLY agree about the belt ... on the issue of the spear I
woulnt have minded that either.. My peircing(as well as all applicable wep
skills) are maxxed I normally duel wield 2 obsidian shards believe it or
not( no flaming me for it they proc on AVERAGE 5 times PER MOB I have
unbuffed dex of almost 160) now its true the one rogue that was there would
probably have put it to better use BUT I would probably have used it if I
had got it.
so we did random with those who could use it..
THEN came the belt and I forgot who the casters name was but he yelled since
it was an all all that EVERYONE randoms for it.. now THAT is crossing the
line.. I would LOVE LOVE LOVED to have that belt..i WOULD use it and I WANT
a haste sash as I do not have one yet..
I do agree bard are very deserving of a roll in the belt.. a caster on the
other hand....... I dont think should
Tuldar 40th bard
Tarew Marr
-----Original Message-----
From: M Sanford (Maev) <
pr0teus@...>
To:
eqbards@onelist.com <
eqbards@onelist.com>
Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Vox Dead on Tarew Marr
>From: "M Sanford (Maev)" <pr0teus@...>
>
>One issue that was raised on this Vox raid really popped a vein in my
>forehead.
>It was when it came around to randoming off the Runed Bolster Belt.
>This is an ac 5, +10 str, +10 dex, +10 sta belt with haste effect. The
>question was raised if bards were worthy of this item, given their melee
>abilities etc. The way I look at it is the way Verant designed us.. if I
>had my choice between that belt and any instrument in the game
>(Maestro's lute for example), I'd glady choose the belt. Surely the item
>would be best in the hands of a monk, warrior, rogue, or ranger. But is
>a bard deserving of an item like that? What do you all think?
>
>Maev Lorekeeper
>Tarew Marr
>
>>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.
>