[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 11247
Date: Mon Dec 6 10:50:35 GMT 1999
Author: Randy Keith
Subject: Re: Bard Handicap of Sorts
> From: "Daniel P. Sniderman" <fuzzbone@...>You need my characters name?
>
> I agree with Weiland 100 percent. I was pretty taken aback by Randy Keith's
> note (he don't post his Character name). Nothing in my or Weiland's note
> deserved the dressing-down in Keith's note. People forget that there are
> real people that sit behind these screens.
>
>Another gig Thursday - late one - so I can't get on after. I had a =
> I never said I had any problems with "taking responsibility to get my corpse
> back" I never came CLOSE to implying the "GM's are worthless". I never
> complained about GM's not "running to help me". The tone of the note was
> completely uncalled for - and this seems to be happening more and more on
> this list.
>Hey look. There is the whole meaning of my post. Look at it again. Was it a flame?
> Most importantly - while not bard related - I think I posted information
> that is useful to other bards. Especially the part about how I was able to
> zone into Sol B to get out of that tricky spot. What are Guides supposed to
> do but Guide? They can't fix bugs. There is more use for them than simply
> helping people who are victims of bugs. I would hope there is more customer
> service in this product that I am paying for. The guides didn't even know
> that you could get into that area and not get out the way you came. (The
> first guide at least. I /petitioned simply to ask what to do - I never knew
> anyone who died that way and wanted to simply know how to get it out. He
> said - get someone with levitate and drag your corpse out...)
>You forget that even if I am high enough to fight Dragon's now. I once had to go through the low levels
> I NEVER asked a Guide (never got a true GM) to do anything but give me
> advice. Well eventually they said "Find someone with group gate". Well I'm
> level 29 in a dungeon designed for my level. Group Gate comes at that same
> level I do believe. Randy Keith is high enough level to go after a dragon -
> so I'm guessing he's mid 40's or higher. At that level you take it for
> granted that you know a lot of people who can group gate. I know two.
> Exactly two - no more. Trying to schedule to be online at the same time as
> then can be very difficult. It was looking very possible that I WOULDN'T
> have been able to schedule that in the week before my corpse decayed. I
> would have lost all my equipment I accumulated in 29 levels. Asking a
> stranger to risk dying themselves on a such a corpse retrieval just "isn't
> gonna happen". I feel sorry for the people that DON'T know anyone who can
> do that.
>Let me tell you something about inconsistancies. They added an "Anti-Kiting" patch a while ago that
> People have been (IMHO rightfully) complaining that there seems to be
> inconsistencies in the way bards are being treated in the game. "We have to
> fix exploits with levitate - so lets make the spell not renewable while
> running" OOPS - we forget to think about what that means for the bard song.
> Oh you can't target your corpse in lava? Let me fetch it for you. - but if
> you can - you are on your note.
>I see a flame here. Sorry, but it is plain as day.
> In closing - the nature of a forum based on written communication can be
> difficult - because it's very easy to be lazy and read the first few
> paragraphs and not bother to try get the tone of the writer. It's easy to
> decide the guy is full of sh*t and show the world how much more intelligent
> than they you are with a quick flame. You can point out how much harder you
> had it when you had your body under a dragon and the wimpy 29th-level only
> had lava to contend with. He had no business even posting it to the
> EQ-BARDS list! He needs to be put in his place!
>I did not flame. My post was not angry. It was not even specifically sent after you. Why should I let this
> I'm sick of seeing people write flames. I often see things I strongly
> disagree with - but usually just let it go (however this time I can't let it
> pass).
>
> Slyde of Xegony
> chal Hobson <given@...>
> To: <eqbards@onelist.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 1999 7:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [eqbards] Bard Handicap of Sorts
>
> > From: "Michal Hobson" <given@...>
> >
> <snip>
> flaws. What I have grown incredibly tired of however is the recurring
> > flames on this list. Perhaps before you post your retort, you should
> > attempt to read between the lines on a post. Instead of downing every
> post
> > that you disagree with, take a position, state it and move on.
> >
> > We're all glad to have the info that comes through this list from the
> likes
> > of John, Shada, Harmonic and many others. I look forward to reading this
> > list. If people who don't have the experience that you do post something
> > that is inaccurate, correct it, don't laugh at it in public.
> >
>
> > Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@... with the subject submissions.