[<a href='11520.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='11518.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='11522.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='11518.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 11519 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Dec  8 17:47:43 GMT 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@xxxxx.xxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: /auc Looking to buy a clue <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1385100231">On Wed, Dec 08/99, James Schuldes &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jgs@...">jgs@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; From: James Schuldes &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jgs@...">jgs@...</a>&gt;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; The words: &quot;I will take a look at this&quot; are missing.  I don&#39;t get the<br/>
&gt; feeling that GZ recognizes it as a bug. My read is that he is brushing it<br/>
&gt; off as &#39;anecdotal evidence&#39; and one player&#39;s opinion rather than accepting<br/>
&gt; the possibility of a bug or unintentional change. <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Well this isn&#39;t surprising in light of the recent information we&#39;ve<br/>
found out from the Shaman&#39;s alchemy. Verant is willing to ignore 100&#39;s<br/>
of bug reports and feedback regarding alchemy being broken rather than<br/>
go take a look at their (later) admitted badly designed test procedure.<br/>
<br/>
As we know bards get no testing at all, what hope do we have of getting<br/>
this fixed or even looked at.<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>