[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 11915
Date: Thu Dec 16 15:26:17 GMT 1999
Author: Ryan Honeyman
Subject: Re: Song Taunting.


> of this would be people that would 'hitch a ride' on a passing bard and the
> casters that would have their mediation interrupted by a passing bard :)

Yup. I remember those days. Bards would always run around the place
and as a cleric in beta it really pissed me off <g> I couldn't ever
meditate. hehe, one song pulse, and poof I stand up. I too will agree
with the assessment made which states:

bard sings song.
song has a fixed radius.
locate all objects within the radius of bard and contact them.
if song is party based, and this object is in party, affect.
if song is nonparty based, and this object is not in party, affect.

what did verant forget?

well, since bards in beta affected everyone, thus making them
unbalanced, verant couldnt radically change the bard song code
so they put in this object sensor stuff in. all objects get
the signal from the bard, whether the song affects them directly
is based on the party status. pretty easy patch to implement,
and it solved the problem. (kinda)

what it didn't do is prevent NPCs from receiving a signal and
interpreting it as assisting another player. if you are a druid
who happens to kite a NPC through my pulsing heal/mana/selos,
I am instantly added to the hate list and will receive faction
hits.

It is my belief that this stems the bard hate and faction mishaps
we often see. This only affects party based songs. If verant
would take the time to code in signals only sent to players in
the group, I believe this would eliminate a lot of headaches we
often receive through no fault of our own. Damn, verant fix
something the right way? I'm dreaming again, sorry.

Harmonic.