I at first thought DT's where pretty stupid too, but if you read my
previous post, i think they where put in for a good reason, and all in all,
it even makes sense. Armed with this knowledge, we cleared the pof and only
had to camp out twice from DT's... where as before we where basically
getting the dt's 75% of the time.
At 09:47 AM 12/16/1999 -0800, you wrote:
>From: jhenders@...
>
>On Wed, Dec 15/99, Ryan Honeyman <honeyman@...> wrote:
>> From: Ryan Honeyman <honeyman@...>
>>
>> > what is a DT? remember, no such thing as a stupid question =)
>>
>> This is a DT:
>>
>> Cazic Thule says 'SHADA!'
>>
>> LOADING, PLEASE WAIT...
>>
>> Death Touch, Instant Death, =)
>>
>
>It's too bad sit ins are a bit overdone now. Does anyone else think
>random death touches are probably one of the cheeziest cop out design
>decisions ever made? It reminds me of something a 12 year old playing DM
>in D&D for the first time would come up with, not something you'd expect
>from a professional game designer. That and relying on obvious
>programming flaws like zone in delay and through wall and ceiling agro
>for their difficulty are probably the things that annoy me most about
>this game.
>
>--
> Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
> GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
> b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*
>
>>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
>with the subject submissions.