[<a href='12113.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='12111.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='12113.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='12110.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 12112 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Dec 21 19:50:58 GMT 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Ryan Honeyman <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Grrrrrrrr! <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-557875119"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; Well we definatly wouldn&#39;t want to increase the cap to a level above bards,<br/>
&gt; as to do so would devalue the ranger. The bard cap, to be honest, is set too<br/>
&gt; high, but we&#39;ll just live with that. <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>  I&#39;ll be honest with you all.  When I say, stone spider on track, or<br/>
  nox on track, the druids are reporting the same exact thing at the<br/>
  same exact time.  That&#39;s 20 vs. 100.  I wouldn&#39;t mind our tracking<br/>
  cap lower whatsoever, to 75 or even 60.  They could then raise <br/>
  druids to 40.  This is such a non-issue, tracking ranges are <br/>
  not affected greatly by slight skill differences.  A ranger can,<br/>
  however, track Djarn from the bat cave, where I cannot.  So that&#39;s<br/>
  the difference between 100 and 200.  Otherwise, I can see everything<br/>
  else the ranger can.<br/>
<br/>
  Harmonic.</div>