[<a href='12517.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='12515.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='12518.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='12512.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 12516 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Jan  5 19:41:11 GMT 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> kim@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Lambent breastplate quest peculiarity <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-348669837">On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Rokenn Swiftsong wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt; It is a bug of a sort. Here is what happens: Lets say a quest requires 3 <br/>
&gt; items (X, Y, & Z).  Player 1 gives the NPC items X, Y, and a third item that <br/>
&gt; is incorrect. Swears up & down at his bad fortune and stomps off.  Player 2 <br/>
&gt; comes up and gives the NPC item Z and gets the goods, and since she also <br/>
&gt; gave the NPC items X & Y gets the &quot;you have something else for me?&quot; message.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Hmm, does this mean my cleric friend (who picked up a gypsy<br/>
lute when I wasn&#39;t there) could give the lute to the NPC, and<br/>
I could give the NPC the carapace and ruby lambent, and I<br/>
would get the breastplate?<br/>
<br/>
Do I really want to try this experiment considering it took me<br/>
3 days to get that damn carapace?  Anyone know of a similar,<br/>
easier quest we could test this theory on first?<br/>
<br/>
--<br/>
John H. Kim<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:kim@...">kim@...</a></div>