[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 12789
Date: Sat Jan 8 00:55:56 GMT 2000
Author: John Tatsukawa
Subject: RE: A new /who command (OT)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Sibbald [mailto:ksibbald@...]
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 4:49 PM
> To: eqbards@onelist.com
> Subject: RE: [eqbards] A new /who command (OT)
>
>
> For doing a guildwho I believe the correct syntax is
> /who all "<part or all
> of guildname>" so for you to get it to work with " Order of
> the Sacred Nut"
> it would be /who all " order of the sacred nut" maybe?
>
> As for zone name who'ing, you would still be stumped by
> anyone who was in
> RP mode or is anon since the zone info wouldn't show up in the list.

No big deal. We don't need exact numbers. Short of everyone in the zone
being anonymous, it will give you some feel for how crowded a particular
zone was.

Or they could just use the function that they currently use for the "/who"
command instead of the "/who all" which shows all of the people in the zone.
(If this is a separate function) This would show the people listed as "anon"
as well.

Thanks, by the way to you all for the quotes trick. I tried it before, but I
must not have been using the correct string to find.

---Windleaf