[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 12950
Date: Wed Jan 12 00:09:37 GMT 2000
Author: John Tatsukawa
Subject: RE: GZ Answers.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: kim@... [mailto:kim@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 4:00 PM
> To: 'eqbards@onelist.com'
> Subject: RE: [eqbards] GZ Answers.
>
>
> From: <kim@...>
>
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, John Tatsukawa wrote:
> >
> > I think out of all the classes that really are screwed up,
> Rogues would get
> > my vote. I haven't had one in a group I've been in for a
> real long time now.
>
> You can do a /who all bard count, /who all rogue count, etc.
> to get numbers for all the non-anonymous players on the
> server. The bard, rogue, and shadowknight have consistently
> yielded the lowest numbers on the two servers I play on.

Actually, on my server, Bertoxxulous, there's a pretty decent number of
bards. I would guess we are around the median for the groups. I forgot about
shadowknights. I haven't grouped with a shadowknight since about May. :-)

I did read a post from either Brad or GZ talking about Rogues and that
they've upped their combat abilities so that they do and sometimes exceed
monk damage (if backstabbing of course) and that they can wear better armor.
Sorry I don't have the quote handy.

---Windleaf