[<a href='13085.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13083.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13094.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='13079.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 13084 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Jan 13 20:47:21 GMT 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@xxxxx.xxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Bards vs Enchanters Part 2 with a little Lullaby thrown in (long) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-565735757">On Thu, Jan 13/00, <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:kim@...">kim@...</a> wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; I&#39;m curious though why you thought the enchanter wouldn&#39;t be<br/>
&gt; able to AE mes.  Most enchanters I know just cast AE mes again<br/>
&gt; before the mobs wake up from the previous one.  If something<br/>
&gt; starts attacking the enchanter, taunt/charm it off him and go<br/>
&gt; back to work.  <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Most good enchanters use one of the color flux stun spells in<br/>
combination with area mez so I find you rarely have to get involved with<br/>
trying to distract a mob off them if the mez fails. They just stun and<br/>
re-mez. Stun doesn&#39;t seem to wake up the other mobs already mez&#39;d.<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>