[<a href='13183.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13181.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13184.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='13181.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 13182 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Mon Jan 17 23:08:46 GMT 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Mike.Langlois@siriuscom.com <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Are we Hybrids? <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-665385432">I agree completely.  If you mean hybrid in the generic sense.  I mean Hybrid as<br/>
a proper noun, being a specific thing in EQ terms.<br/>
<br/>
That is, a fighter/caster mix.  In EQ,  Hybrid means part Warrior Class and part<br/>
Druid/Cleric/Necro.<br/>
<br/>
In that sense, I say we aren&#39;t.  We have the caster, just not the fighter.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
I promise not to beat this one again either :)<br/>
<br/>
Golias, Sol Ro<br/>
----------------------<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
From: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:Valharick@...">Valharick@...</a><br/>
<br/>
IMO bards are the ultimate hybrid (not saying we are the best) just that we<br/>
are a mixture of each class. We can do a bit of everything that any class can<br/>
do.<br/>
<br/>
Ren</div>