[<a href='13352.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13350.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13355.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='13348.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 13351 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Jan 20 19:41:12 GMT 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas) <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: Are we Hybrids? <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-536915692">i think he is using a bind argument in order to really say we could use just<br/>
1 more defensive skill, such as parry.  i agree that we should get parry and<br/>
have it capped around the same as our dodge (125?).  it would just put us<br/>
one very small notch towards a melee class, which i do think we are far more<br/>
than a cleric or shaman.  i&#39;ve always thought we should not get bind, and<br/>
all the reasons for and against have already been gone over a million times.<br/>
<br/>
Shada Bladestorm, L50 Wood Elf Bard<br/>
Tyria Sarkin, L37 High Elf Wizard<br/>
&lt;Afterlife&gt; Mithaniel Marr Server<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; You seriously downplay the value of bind... why do yo want it?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; I&#39;m a singer not a fighter. </span></blockquote></div>