[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 13776
Date: Wed Jan 26 19:17:28 GMT 2000
Author: Perhaps a Princess...
Subject: RE: Singing Strategy
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kimes, Dean W. [mailto:Dean_Kimes@...]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 11:06 AM
>To: 'eqbards@onelist.com'
>Subject: [eqbards] Singing Strategy
>
>
>From: "Kimes, Dean W." <Dean_Kimes@...>
>
>Another point on the idea of backing off or waiting to nuke in the case of
>casters. Because they have limited mana, if a caster nukes in the first
>half of a fight or the second half of the fight it doesn't matter they do
>the same damage and are just as effective damage-wise either way. They
>would be wasting mana if they nuked constantly anyhow. If a bard doesn't
>sing for half the fight its a huge hit to their effectiveness, since there
>is no wasting of mana to deal with. Would anyone seriously ever suggest a
>ranger only dual-wield for part of a fight? Or that a warrior not use his
>extra attacks for part of a fight? Of course not. The main reason to have
>nukers wait is because they have limited mana anyhow and they will avoid
>getting hurt and still do just as much damage by waiting. Bards
>do not have
>this luxury.
>
> Kitasi
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
>Free shipping through 1/31/2000 at Visualize.com
>where you'll find limited edition prints & photographs
>for your home, office, collection or gift-giving needs.
><a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/VisualizeJanuary ">Click Here</a>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to
>lol@... with the subject submissions.
>
>