[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 14178
Date: Wed Feb 2 16:31:35 GMT 2000
Author: John Tatsukawa
Subject: RE: Anti-EQ (was mistmore)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Papa Legba [mailto:legba@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 6:10 AM
> To: eqbards@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [eqbards] Anti-EQ (was mistmore)
>
>
> From: Papa Legba <legba@...>
> > Ugh! I'm one of those people who find this stuff to be
> annoying. I mean, if
> > you're doing it on /say or /group that's fine, but IMO
> (nothing humble about
> > it) it is obnoxious to broadcast this stuff and revel in
> the complaints.
> >
> > But in your favor, at least you're doing it on ooc where I
> can turn this
> > off. :-P I really hate when people do this stuff on shout, which is
> > necessary for train updates. *Windleaf ducks the pie thrown by Papa*
>
> No pie coming, I agree with you (essentially). Spamming
> shouts annoy me
> as they are supposed to be in chracter and should be used for
> important
> stuff (like trains). It seems the point would be to do whatever you
> want with (within reason). Perhaps singing "Come sail away" is a bit
> too far, but I dont see it as any difference than talking about Super
> Bowl or your plans tonight. Then again perhaps the reason I
> had such an
> awful day was all the bad karma generated when I was singing...

Lol! Well you get better far Karma from that than when I do a Riverdance.
:-)

> Unfortunatly I am pretty ppor right now (20P maybe), however my druid
> friend said he has a new whip for me (from Paw). Any one know if its
> any good? I think he's just trying to bribe me into playing some
> more...

Yea, this is why around level 18 I started a magician and played him for a
while as I did a lot of soloing. It was a painful time for me as a bard.
Things really picked up for me about level 23 when I started soloing the
gargs. And a pack full of gargoyle eyes makes one pretty happy.

> > > Well until Diablo II makes it to the shelves, "See you around"
> >
> > I've been waiting for this for a few years and will be
> shocked when Blizzard
> > finally does release this. It's gotten to the point where I'm pretty
> > non-chalant about it. I was real excited for this to be
> released early last
> > year. Let's see if they do indeed release it as expected.
>
> I'll cut Blizzard some slack. They have been REALLY good about making
> their release dates in the past. And they're games are always released
> in a nearly final version (as opposed to most companies, who release
> games that I shudder to call Beta). One big blown release date (they
> are going to be min of 9 months late on this one) is very
> forgivable if
> the game is fairly clean when released. I have no idea what they were
> thinking when they made that original release date, I always
> follow the
> progress of games I am eager to play and I (knowing nothing other than
> public info) could see they weren't going to come close to making it.

Well I've waited through at least 3 re-adjusted release dates that I can
recall for Diablo II, essentially 2 missed Christmas's and have kind of
soured on the game due to this. Also, EQ has definitely affected my desire
to play this, but my friends will probably buy Diablo II, so I'll end up
joining them.

Diablo had it's share of bugs as well and tons of anti-hacking patches that
I'm sure was the cause of delays for Diablo II. Diablo II initially looked
like it was going to be just an enhanced Diablo with some new places to hunt
and a new character, but has since evolved into a newer game.

Oh well. If it's fun to play, I'm sure I'll be there.

--Windeaf