[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 14247
Date: Thu Feb 3 18:23:05 GMT 2000
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: How Lullaby used to be. (Results on how it is now)


From: <kim@...>

On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Kimes, Dean W. wrote:
>
> I did another test last night, just to be sure how bad the nerfing of
> Lullaby really was, and to have a baseline to test against this patch to
see
> if anything changes. I had the following results vs my West Freeport test
> subject.

>These percentages are very close to what I got. But:

>You got close to double the number of total resists that I got
(10/415).

I got 31/563 = 5.5%
You got 10/415 = 2.5%
Not sure how you got so few, may be an aberration I was under the impression
that no song, spell, etc., could ever get below a 5% outright resist rate.

I did a small test with my charisma at 97 to see if that changed things.
Secondary resists were 38.9% with 200 pulses. I got bored at that point and
gave up disgusted.

Kit