[<a href='14841.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='14839.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='14873.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='14838.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 14840 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Fri Feb 11 18:10:17 GMT 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Ryan Honeyman <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Scully it&#39;s me <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-171298798"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; that would be my guildmate Nagrim, a level 50 warrior.  every time?  <br/>
&gt; maybe not, but 1 in a million or &quot;never&quot; is quite incorrect to be sure.<br/>
&gt; i told you to believe.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>  Mulder,<br/>
<br/>
  My point being, we&#39;re investigating a case here.<br/>
<br/>
  I am dedicated to objectivity and common sense, while still <br/>
  staying open to extreme possibilities.<br/>
<br/>
  Clearly, if a one weapon makes the difference in the ability <br/>
  to tackle a hill giant by oneself, you would question whether<br/>
  that class itself is balanced in relation to the npc.  Most <br/>
  warriors are not wielding Monsoon, Sword of the Swiftwind.<br/>
<br/>
  If Bladestorm or Monsoon are the turning point in the battle,<br/>
  then I&#39;m not sure it becomes the class&#39; skill which is winning,<br/>
  rather an extremely rare highpowered weapon which is winning.<br/>
<br/>
  If I had Bardstorm, Sword of the Asskicking I could probably <br/>
  solo a hill giant too. ;-)<br/>
<br/>
  Scully~</div>