[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 15277
Date: Wed Feb 23 13:47:32 GMT 2000
Author: Stephen E. McCloskey
Subject: Re: New Lullaby theory


I'll try to take a look tonight if I get time. I have a 23 bard and I was
in Crushbone helping the low levels the other day. I was trying to put
centurions and Legionaries to sleep. I didn't have a lot of problems with
the cents, but the legos were near impossible for me. I finally gave up on
sleeping them at the zone line.

Bard taunt lowered? ...my ass
-Steve


At 05:15 PM 2/22/00 -0500, you wrote:
>From: kim@...
>
>This theory came up on the concert hall board. A bard there
>claimed to have used Lullaby with great success in Runnyeye.
>
>Anyways, my new theory is that somewhere in the resist check
>when GZ should've used the mob's level, he accidently used the
>bard's level. So if you (the bard) are relatively low level,
>the song works reasonably well against even con mobs. But if
>you are high level, the minimum resist rate is that of a high
>level mob.
>
>It has a lot of holes, but it warrants checking out. So if
>you are L15-25 or so, could you try logging some of your
>Lullaby episodes? If I remember, Kitasi is about the right
>level for Runnyeye, no? :) You can pull out the data
>yourself, or email the logfile to me and I'll do it.
>
>--
>John H. Kim
>kim@...
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 0.0%
>Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/911/5/_/_/_/951257760/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
>with the subject submissions.