[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 15330
Date: Wed Feb 23 19:45:29 GMT 2000
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: New Lullaby theory


I'll try but it'll be tough if our cleric isn't around. I can't hang in all
that long with something close to my level if its beating on me. May take a
few days I'm pretty tied up till the weekend.

Kit

-----Original Message-----
From: kim@... [mailto:kim@...]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 11:49 AM
To: 'eqbards@onelist.com'
Subject: RE: [eqbards] New Lullaby theory


From: <kim@...>

Kitsai (and other lower level bards),

Could you please test Lullaby against some mobs closer to your
level? The guy claiming it worked great for him in Runnyeye
posted a logfile with a sample size of 456 (good enough for
me). He got a 10% primary resist rate, and a 28% secondary
resist rate.

This would support the theory that there's a sign error in the
secondary resist check - r goes up as R goes down. But since
r+R = approx constant, the song still seems as ineffective to
you. Please do the test and send me the logfile. Even if
your overall resist rate is the same as mine, the difference
in r and R may be enough to prove a sign error.

--
John H. Kim
kim@...


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shabang!com is the place to get your FREE eStore, Absolutely FREE
Forever. If you have any desires to sell your products or services
online, or you want to expand your customer base for FREE, Come check
out Shabang!com FREE eStores!
http://click.egroups.com/1/1299/5/_/_/_/951331767/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.